Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Possible mismatch between binary_sensor in HA and MSR
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Answered] OK to remove old json files?
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deprecation Announcement: 32-bit ARM *docker* images
toggledbitsT
If you are using the armv7l docker image, the OpenJS Foundation that publishes node is no longer producing 32-bit builds as of v24. That means the last supported LTS version of node for armv7l is v22, which will go End-of-Life in May 2027. Therefore, the Reactor armv7l image is now deprecated and will only be produced until node v22 goes EOL, and I will not publish armv7l images beyond that date. If you are running an RPi 3 or earlier with Reactor, you are on this image, and will need to upgrade hardware to a 64-bit model and use the arm64 image. If you need help getting it done, ask in this category.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] build 26150 - engine not starting
G
@toggledbits I pulled the image (well, Watchtower did) and within minutes the whole system went offline. The log looks like it ends with 26143. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mkahsmgf/26qq82mw-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lqyfljfi/22f8on0t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lsb61rw8/24oenqi2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/rule-lrh58he0:S-1c00gfib-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1c00dylr-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1nam9w5u-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miuh2qqi/22ls4lql-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1vj8sdfc-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1qanz01x-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/24lq19p6-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mk0o8iox/23oy468y-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miscg2h3/rule-miscg2h3:S-22gmbq1c-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrfjke/238p0old-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-m7ccsso5/re-m7ccsso5-1r0myjxa-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/19nl9wq2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3xk9t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3vv5m-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/re-ln7j2nqp-22mx9lzd-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/22mx87c8-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-licneppy/1mzwe7ht-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ml3194ih/25jqt1j4-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrg7kf/227hshak-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13ua1p95-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13uagam7-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x4cbv-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x2fyl-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-lscjrws1/238p5c22-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lbwr0jvq/1xkczf03-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <Structure:NOTICE> Structure Structure#1 stopped [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <app:NOTICE> Closing APIs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: disconnecting from "192.168.1.23#82" (1001 service closing) [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.548Z <httpapi:NOTICE> HTTP API closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: server closed [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <httpapi:INFO> HTTP server closed. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <app:NOTICE> Stopping timers... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Shutdown complete, process ID 1 [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Closing logs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <default:null> Closing log I can SSH to the VM. Alas, I do not have the previous image for 26143 as I'm a little too quick sometimes on housekeeping.
Multi-System Reactor
http request action & digest auth
tunnusT
I’m using the HTTP Request action in MSR and need to authenticate against an endpoint that uses HTTP Digest authentication. Now that endpoint was changed to use SHA-256 in digest auth, so I would like to know if MSR supports it, or is it limited to MD5-based digest auth?
Multi-System Reactor

Possible mismatch between binary_sensor in HA and MSR

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
25 Posts 3 Posters 2.1k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CatmanV2C Offline
    CatmanV2C Offline
    CatmanV2
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    I don't believe so, It's been used in several places in HA without issue across restarts. I will see if I can double check that however, as it may simply not have been noticed if it's coming up 'off' and immediately tripping to the correct state.

    C

    The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CatmanV2C Offline
      CatmanV2C Offline
      CatmanV2
      wrote on last edited by CatmanV2
      #15

      OK I've just done some digging: When HA restarts, all three sensors

      sensor.rachel_primary_region
      

      Go 'unknown'

      Someone Home (fairly logically) goes 'Off'

      The period of 'Unknown' is about 5-10 seconds before the correct status is realised.

      Here's the data from the last restart

      binary_sensor.someone_home	unknown	2026-05-19T12:06:55.461Z
      binary_sensor.someone_home	off	2026-05-19T12:07:04.582Z
      binary_sensor.someone_home	on	2026-05-19T12:07:11.505Z
      
      

      TIA

      C

      The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • therealdbT Offline
        therealdbT Offline
        therealdb
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        It may. I have similar behavior with other Template sensors being 0/null/off at boot.

        As a defensive measure, I always make the condition to be sustained for at least 10 secs and/or avoid them being evaluated when ha has been restarted for the last 20 secs.

        I rarely use ha templates, so my experience is anecdotal.

        --
        On a mission to automate everything.

        My MS Reactor contrib
        My Luup Plug-ins

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • CatmanV2C Offline
          CatmanV2C Offline
          CatmanV2
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          Thanks, helpful input!

          C

          The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • therealdbT Offline
            therealdbT Offline
            therealdb
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            I think you may just filter for unknown and return null. Tell that to my friend Claude 🤣

            --
            On a mission to automate everything.

            My MS Reactor contrib
            My Luup Plug-ins

            CatmanV2C 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • therealdbT therealdb

              I think you may just filter for unknown and return null. Tell that to my friend Claude 🤣

              CatmanV2C Offline
              CatmanV2C Offline
              CatmanV2
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              @therealdb that would rather force (in this case) all the heating off (or on), wouldn't it?

              I like the idea of a 30 second delay though.

              C

              The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • therealdbT Offline
                therealdbT Offline
                therealdb
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                I don’t know if setting to null it’s better for reactor. @toggledbits here is the best source of truth.

                --
                On a mission to automate everything.

                My MS Reactor contrib
                My Luup Plug-ins

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • CatmanV2C Offline
                  CatmanV2C Offline
                  CatmanV2
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  Of course. I'm not sure what I'd do without him!

                  C

                  The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #22

                    OK. I can't prevent HA from starting up in an undefined state, and the effect that can have on the rules, but @therealdb is spot-on with an approach to dealing with that, since the corrected state usually comes pretty quickly after. Sometimes, you just have to debounce those switches a little.

                    Beyond that, there is definitely an opportunity for a race condition and I think I have a good general fix for that. The logs support that cause as well. Testing my updates now. Will likely do a build with the update tomorrow.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • CatmanV2C Offline
                      CatmanV2C Offline
                      CatmanV2
                      wrote on last edited by CatmanV2
                      #23

                      Fabulous!

                      I've actually just put reset delays in the two rules that are triggered. The 'set' is heating on so it's the reset that's a PITA. That should cover it.

                      C

                      The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                        #24

                        This is just a follow-up to link this conversation to the announcement for the build that addresses it, and expands generally on transient startup/outage states in HA integrations

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • CatmanV2C Offline
                          CatmanV2C Offline
                          CatmanV2
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          Thanks, installed and working.

                          Although after the first restart there were some virtual switches in HA that were not being accurately reflected in MSR, but I restarted MSR again, and everything looks fine.

                          Thanks again for your help. Next time I'll upload the logs to start with!

                          C

                          The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          Recent Topics

                          • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                            T
                            tamorgen
                            0
                            7
                            128

                          • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                            CrilleC
                            Crille
                            0
                            5
                            81

                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            5
                            148
                            129.4k

                          • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                            therealdbT
                            therealdb
                            1
                            5
                            96

                          • Upgrade Issues
                            T
                            tbully
                            0
                            9
                            223

                          • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            10
                            244

                          • [SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
                            G
                            gwp1
                            0
                            5
                            124

                          • openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
                            A
                            a-lurker
                            0
                            2
                            171

                          • Logon screen timeout
                            G
                            gwp1
                            0
                            5
                            190

                          • [MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            9
                            358

                          • Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            4
                            214
                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Unsolved