Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Rule for devices battery level ?
Set Reaction > Script Action
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Errors after updating to MQTTController build 25139
tunnusT
I'm running MSR build 25139 on Docker, using MQTT controller 24293, and everything working as expected. But if I try to upgrade to MQTTController build 25139, I'm getting the following errors on MSR UI: An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.god Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.green Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.red Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto run" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.pump Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa watchdog" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.status Last 11:20:37 My MQTT configuration (local_mqtt_devices.yaml) for the related entity is: layzspa_message: type: ValueSensor capabilities: ["temperature_sensor", "value_sensor", "power_sensor"] primary_attribute: power_sensor.value events: "layzspa/message": "power_sensor.value": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.PWR )' expr: "float(payload.PWR)" "value_sensor.air": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AIR )' expr: "float(payload.AIR)" "value_sensor.pump": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.FLT )' expr: "float(payload.FLT)" "value_sensor.god": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GOD )' expr: "float(payload.GOD)" "value_sensor.lock": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.LCK )' expr: "float(payload.LCK)" "value_sensor.unit": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.UNT )' expr: "float(payload.UNT)" "value_sensor.error": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.ERR )' expr: "float(payload.ERR)" "temperature_sensor.green": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GRN )' expr: "float(payload.GRN)" "temperature_sensor.red": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.RED )' expr: "float(payload.RED)" "temperature_sensor.target": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TGT )' expr: "float(payload.TGT)" "temperature_sensor.value": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TMP )' expr: "float(payload.TMP)" "temperature_sensor.virtual": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.VTM )' expr: "round(float(payload.VTM), 1)" "temperature_sensor.ambient": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AMB )' expr: "float(payload.AMB)" "layzspa/Status": "value_sensor.status": if_expr: '! isnull( payload )' expr: "payload" "layzspa/button": "value_sensor.button": if_expr: '! isnull( payload )' expr: "payload" and in reactor.yaml I have: "layzspa_states": name: "Lay-Z-Spa States" friendly_name: 'Lay-Z-Spa States' include: layzspa_message I realize my MQTT configuration might be a bit unorthodox, but could there still be something unintentional in the latest MQTTController build? If needed, I can provide detailed logs.
Multi-System Reactor
🎉 My very first MSR controller: OpenSprinkler
therealdbT
Since today is my birthday - and I still pretend to be unconventional - I'm giving away a present to this wonderful community and I'm releasing my first OpenSprinkler controller for MSR. It was real fun to code it - and while it's still WIP, it seems to work OK for me. It's polling-based at the moment, but I'll add support for updates via MQTT very soon (it's already partially coded). Get it at (install is similar to MQTTController and such): https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-opensprinkler Feel free to try it. It's beta software, but it's stable. I'll update it weekly until all the tasks from my todo list are empty. Since I've learnt a lot from this controller, I'll explore new controllers soon.
Multi-System Reactor
Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
T
Good day all, I'm in the process of trying to shut down my 10 year old Linux home server that served many purposes, but primarily it's what I used for my NAS/Plex Media server. I migrated the NAS aspect of the server in November of last year to a true NAS solution (Ubiquti UNAS Pro), which is rack mount and much more efficient than my old tower, which it's only side benefit was heating my home office during the winter. Unfortunately it also means heating my home office during the summer, which were about to be in full swing. I have two things running on this 10 year old server at this point. MSR and pi-hole. I'm running Plex Media Server on Fedora Workstation in Podman on mini PC, which is much more energy efficient than my old tower. My next step is to migrate MSR. I know there are images of MSR out there, and creating it is well documented. I'm going to be using Podman instead of Docker for various reasons, but they work very similar. What I don't know, is what I need to do to migrate my existing Bare Metal installation over to a container. Has anyone done this? Any advice?
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Organizing/ structuring rule sets and rules
R
Hi guys, Just wondering how you guys organize your rule sets and rules. I wish I had an extra layer to have some more granularity, but my feature request was not popular. Maybe there are better ways to organize my rule sets. I use the rule sets now primarily for rooms. So a rule set per room. But maybe grouping by functionality works better. Any examples/ suggestions would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Moving MSR from a QNAP container to RP 5 - some issues
Tom_DT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Widget deletion does not work and landing page (status) is empy
M
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Need help reducing false positive notifications
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deleting widgets
tunnusT
Hopefully a trivial question, but how do you delete widgets in a status page? Using build 22266
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT configuration question
tunnusT
I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file x_mqtt_device: set_speed: arguments: speed: type: str topic: "command/%friendly_name%" payload: type: json expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }' While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?
Multi-System Reactor
System Configuration Check - time is offset
F
Hi! I get this message when I'm on the status tab: System Configuration Check The time on this system and on the Reactor host are significantly different. This may be due to incorrect system configuration on either or both. Please check the configuration of both systems. The host reports 2025-04-01T15:29:29.252Z; browser reports 2025-04-01T15:29:40.528Z; difference 11.276 seconds. I have MSR installed as a docker on my Home Assistant Blue / Hardkernel ODROID-N2/N2+. MSR version is latest-25082-3c348de6. HA versions are: Core 2025.3.4 Supervisor 2025.03.4 Operating System 15.1 I have restarted HA as well as MSR multiple times. This message didn´t show two weeks ago. Don´t know if it have anything to do with the latest MSR version. Do anyone know what I can try? Thanks in advance! Let's Be Careful Out There (Hill Street reference...) /Fanan
Multi-System Reactor
Programmatically capture HTTP Request action status code or error
therealdbT
I have a very strange situation, where if InfluxDB restarts, other containers may fail when restarting at the same time (under not easy to understand circumstances), and InfluxDB remains unreachable (and these containers crashes). I need to reboot these containers in an exact order, after rebooting InfluxDB. While I understand what's going on, I need a way to reliable determine that InfluxDB is not reachable and these containers are not reachable, in order to identify this situation and manually check what's going on - and, maybe, in the future, automatically restart them if needed. So, I was looking at HTTP Request action, but I need to capture the HTTP response code, instead of the response (becase if ping is OK, InfluxDB will reply with a 204), and, potentially, a way to programmatically detect that it's failing to get the response. While I could write a custom HTTP controller for this or a custom HTTP virtual device, I was wondering if this is somewhat on you roadmap @toggledbits Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
ZwaveJSUI - RGBWW BULB - Warm/Cold White interfered with RGB settings - Bulb doesn't change color if in WarmWhite state.
N
Hi , I'm on -Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25067-62e21a2d -Docker on Synology NAS -ZWaveJSUI 9.31.0.6c80945 Problem with ZwaveJSUI: When I try to change color to a bulb RGBWW, it doesn't change to the RGB color and the bulb remains warm or cold white. I tryed with Zipato RGBW Bulb V2 RGBWE2, Hank Bulb HKZW-RGB01, Aentec 6 A-ZWA002, so seems that it happens with all RGBWW bulb with reactor/zwavejsui. I'm using from reator the entity action: "rgb_color.set" and "rgb_color.set_rgb". After I send the reactor command, It changes in zwavejsui the rgb settings but doesn't put the white channel to "0", so the prevalent channel remains warm/cold White and the bulb doesn't change into the rgb color. This is the status of the bulb in zwavejsui after "rgb_color.set" (235,33,33,) and the bulb is still warmWhite. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor={"warmWhite":204,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} The "cold white" and "warm white" settings interfer with the rgb color settings. Reactor can change bulb colors with rgb_color set — (value, ui8, 0x000000 to 0xffffff) or rgb_color set_rgb — (red, green, blue, all ui1, 0 to 255) but if warm or cold white are not to "0", zwavejsui doesn't change them and I can't find a way to change into rgb or from rgb back to warm white. So if I use from reactor: rgb_color set_rgb — (235,33,33) in zwavejsui I have x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: targetColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: targetColor 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: currentColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: currentColor In zwavejsui, the bulb changes rgb set but warm White remains to "204" and the bulb remais on warm White channel bacause is prevalent on rgb set. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_0=204 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_1=0 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_2=235 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_3=33 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_4=33 Is it possible to targetColor also for "warmWhite" and "coldWhite" and have something similar to this? x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"warmWhite":0,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} Thanks in advance.
Multi-System Reactor
Problem with simultaneous notifications.
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Problem after upgrading to 25067
R
MSR had been running fine, but I decided to follow the message to upgrade to 25067. Since the upgrade, I have received the message "Controller "<name>" (HubitatController hubitat2) could not be loaded at startup. Its ID is not unique." MSR throws the message on every restart. Has anyone else encountered this problem? I am running MSR on a Raspberry Pi4 connecting to two Hubitat units over an OpenVPN tunnel. One C8 and a C8 Pro. Both are up-to-date. It appears that despite the error message that MSR may be operating properly.
Multi-System Reactor
Global expressions not always evaluated
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression evaluation
V
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Rule for devices battery level ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
43 Posts 6 Posters 2.7k Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cw-kidC cw-kid

    I seem to have a problem with my trigger however

    905686d6-d0dc-4f28-ae27-37fb5b167683-image.png

    Its triggering the reaction when I don't want it to do so.

    I need to make the value of the expression "battery_low_names" null when no devices are below the battery level of 10% etc.

    I've tried adding in a ? in to the expression but it doesn't seem to be working

    join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id)?.name, ', ')
    

    EDIT:

    This seems to work instead adding "? id: null" to the end of the expression.

    join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id).name, ', ') ? id: null
    

    6f03c823-ba5f-4ea4-b794-313bdfe2f7b9-image.png

    EDIT 2:

    Maybe it doesn't work because now its not putting in the devices name in the expression value

    8ff5e855-5f1d-470f-8ca7-d4542728abf5-image.png

    EDIT 3:

    I then tried changing the trigger altogether to this, but it doesn't work and becomes true anyway.

    7ac8c487-52db-4907-b06c-99ccc293f6f7-image.png

    Likewise with this one:

    f9835abb-2cec-4b65-ab01-58acea857711-image.png

    Maybe there is a bug? All of these are going true and running the reaction when I expect them not to do that

    a3821660-9193-4725-845f-ea83766162a0-image.png

    IanI Offline
    IanI Offline
    Ian
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @cw-kid

    I'm using this.

    7a996464-1926-424b-800c-7358045bc946-image.png

    This goes true when battery_low_names is populated with the names of the devices with low battery levels.

    cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • IanI Ian

      @cw-kid

      I'm using this.

      7a996464-1926-424b-800c-7358045bc946-image.png

      This goes true when battery_low_names is populated with the names of the devices with low battery levels.

      cw-kidC Offline
      cw-kidC Offline
      cw-kid
      wrote on last edited by cw-kid
      #9

      @ian

      That works !

      Easy when you know how..

      The trigger is now going false when no devices are in the battery_low_names expression results.

      b398a767-2130-47b6-bca1-bdcd3346f965-image.png

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        @cw-kid One of my to-do list tasks for expressions is to be able to create a list of devices that match a test. Until that comes, you can just build your own array of battery-operated devices like this (lets call this battery_device_list) :

        35882eb5-310f-41b1-a95e-eaf52dbc0bb8-image.png

        Then, you can reduce that list to all of the devices that have battery < 10%:

        c108f634-1ad1-4156-9e47-777c98c9d69b-image.png

        That leaves you with an array of the entities that have low battery. Use another expression to convert that into a comma-separated list of entity names:

        30ca5615-71c3-431e-b83f-d0aeff6144e4-image.png

        Your rule just checks to see if that battery_low_names (a string now) expression is not empty, and runs whatever notifications you want to run if it is not. You can include the battery_low_names variable in the text of your email or other notification, too.

        1bfd5d0f-1313-4613-ac2b-5731ddf5c594-image.png

        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
        #10

        @toggledbits said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

        (a string now) expression is not empty,

        Details.

        Also these can be rule expressions, they do not need to be global.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cw-kidC Offline
          cw-kidC Offline
          cw-kid
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Thanks I've changed the expressions to local rule ones instead and its all still working.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kid
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

            Say I don't immediate go replace the battery on the device mentioned, can I have the rule run the alerts / notifications each day or week until I have done it and changed the batteries ?

            Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

            Thanks

            toggledbitsT IanI 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • cw-kidC cw-kid

              How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

              Say I don't immediate go replace the battery on the device mentioned, can I have the rule run the alerts / notifications each day or week until I have done it and changed the batteries ?

              Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

              Thanks

              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

              How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

              Wrap the condition in a group and put the group in "pulse" output mode with the timing you want.

              @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

              Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

              Yes, but I'm going to leave it as an exercise for the reader. Level of difficulty: moderate.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cw-kidC cw-kid

                How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                Say I don't immediate go replace the battery on the device mentioned, can I have the rule run the alerts / notifications each day or week until I have done it and changed the batteries ?

                Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                Thanks

                IanI Offline
                IanI Offline
                Ian
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                @cw-kid

                Try this.

                16c0d434-95ea-453d-b06e-e9a68663fbe5-image.png

                cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • IanI Ian

                  @cw-kid

                  Try this.

                  16c0d434-95ea-453d-b06e-e9a68663fbe5-image.png

                  cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kid
                  wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                  #15

                  @ian

                  Thanks Ian that works, my Telegram text message now has the number% at the end of the message now.

                  However this messes up the Google Home TTS announcement sent via node-red, if I have a "%" in the expression. So I had to change it to the word "percent" instead and now the TTS sounds correct when spoken.

                  join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id).name + " " + "at" + " " + int(getEntity(id).attributes.battery_power.level * 100) + " percent", ', ')
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                    How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                    Wrap the condition in a group and put the group in "pulse" output mode with the timing you want.

                    @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                    Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                    Yes, but I'm going to leave it as an exercise for the reader. Level of difficulty: moderate.

                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    @toggledbits said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                    Wrap the condition in a group and put the group in "pulse" output mode with the timing you want.

                    Like this?

                    146e1b92-875d-4a6e-8619-e555c355fbce-image.png

                    5eed7d9c-43ab-4a1e-8505-c0679f0ce401-image.png

                    Seems to be working and the alerts are repeating every 60 seconds now. I will just set this to 24hrs I think.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      @cw-kid One of my to-do list tasks for expressions is to be able to create a list of devices that match a test. Until that comes, you can just build your own array of battery-operated devices like this (lets call this battery_device_list) :

                      35882eb5-310f-41b1-a95e-eaf52dbc0bb8-image.png

                      Then, you can reduce that list to all of the devices that have battery < 10%:

                      c108f634-1ad1-4156-9e47-777c98c9d69b-image.png

                      That leaves you with an array of the entities that have low battery. Use another expression to convert that into a comma-separated list of entity names:

                      30ca5615-71c3-431e-b83f-d0aeff6144e4-image.png

                      Your rule just checks to see if that battery_low_names (a string now) expression is not empty, and runs whatever notifications you want to run if it is not. You can include the battery_low_names variable in the text of your email or other notification, too.

                      1bfd5d0f-1313-4613-ac2b-5731ddf5c594-image.png

                      CrilleC Offline
                      CrilleC Offline
                      Crille
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @toggledbits said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                      One of my to-do list tasks for expressions is to be able to create a list of devices that match a test.

                      This is very useful, is it released yet or still on the to-do list?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                        #18

                        Still on the to-do list, but I think I'm close to figuring out what I want it to do. These things get harder with time: the more people use them, the more etched in stone they become, so making a "first guess" and completely changing things later isn't really something I want to do a lot of. If I can get something good on the first try, that's the way...

                        Here's what I'm thinking...

                        First, the matchEntities() function would quickly narrow down the set, in a manner similar to the filters on the Entities page and the Entity Picker:

                            living_room_sensors = matchEntities( { controller: 'vera', capability: [ 'binary_sensor', 'value_sensor'' ], group: 'Living Room' } )
                        

                        This would return an array of entities. From here, you could use an each statement to further filter any deep refinements. This expression would take the above array of sensors in the Living Room and pick out those that are battery powered and have battery level under 50%:

                            low_battery_living_room = each e in living_room_sensors: e.attributes.battery_power?.level <= 0.5 ? e : null
                        

                        I'm liking this approach because the function could do the bulk reduction of potential hundreds of entities down to a manageable list, and then the final filtering of the list can be done with expressions for maximum flexibility.

                        Any thoughts about that?

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        CrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                          Still on the to-do list, but I think I'm close to figuring out what I want it to do. These things get harder with time: the more people use them, the more etched in stone they become, so making a "first guess" and completely changing things later isn't really something I want to do a lot of. If I can get something good on the first try, that's the way...

                          Here's what I'm thinking...

                          First, the matchEntities() function would quickly narrow down the set, in a manner similar to the filters on the Entities page and the Entity Picker:

                              living_room_sensors = matchEntities( { controller: 'vera', capability: [ 'binary_sensor', 'value_sensor'' ], group: 'Living Room' } )
                          

                          This would return an array of entities. From here, you could use an each statement to further filter any deep refinements. This expression would take the above array of sensors in the Living Room and pick out those that are battery powered and have battery level under 50%:

                              low_battery_living_room = each e in living_room_sensors: e.attributes.battery_power?.level <= 0.5 ? e : null
                          

                          I'm liking this approach because the function could do the bulk reduction of potential hundreds of entities down to a manageable list, and then the final filtering of the list can be done with expressions for maximum flexibility.

                          Any thoughts about that?

                          CrilleC Offline
                          CrilleC Offline
                          Crille
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          @toggledbits That would do it for me, is the matchEntities() function already available in Expressions? I get no error but no matter what I do the Expression always returns an empty array.
                          I'd expect this to contain at least something:

                          matchEntities( { controller: 'vera', capability: 'humidity_sensor' } )
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbits
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            No, it's not yet available.

                            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                            CrilleC tunnusT 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • CrilleC Offline
                              CrilleC Offline
                              Crille
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              Ah, that explains a lot 🙂 I like the idea, it seems very flexible.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                No, it's not yet available.

                                CrilleC Offline
                                CrilleC Offline
                                Crille
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                @toggledbits Thanks, the new matchEntities() is brilliant. Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • CrilleC Crille

                                  @toggledbits Thanks, the new matchEntities() is brilliant. Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbits
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @crille said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                                  Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                  Tell me about that...

                                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                  CrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                    @crille said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                                    Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                    Tell me about that...

                                    CrilleC Offline
                                    CrilleC Offline
                                    Crille
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @toggledbits Inspired by this topic I created a rule with similar expressions to monitor/notify x_ezlo_device.reachable for all my Ezlo devices. Instead of managing a static array, like the battery_device_list in this topic, the expression matchEntities( {capability: 'x_ezlo_device'} ) generates a list of devices that is dynamically updated if devices are added or removed from the controller.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                      No, it's not yet available.

                                      tunnusT Offline
                                      tunnusT Offline
                                      tunnus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @toggledbits I'm testing this new function, but somehow it does not show all the devices I'm expecting it to show. See examples below

                                      Screenshot 2021-09-30 at 17.34.23.png

                                      Array is empty, although it should contain one device:

                                      Screenshot 2021-09-30 at 17.41.02.png

                                      Strange, as device 216 definitely has capability "x_vera_device"

                                      Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbits
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        One of the issues I see in matchEntities() as it currently works is that it returns an array of entity objects with attribute values, but it does not update that array when any of the returned entities' attributes or other values changes. So it's certain, then, that the attributes will go stale in the result array.

                                        For the next build, I will change the definition of this function to return canonical entity IDs only, rather than entity objects, so you will have to use getEntity() in your each over the results, as you did with your test_array example, and this will ensure that you are always looking at the latest attributes. You can test this theory now by modifying your each for d_failure_list to use getEntity( id.canonical_id ).

                                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                        tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                          One of the issues I see in matchEntities() as it currently works is that it returns an array of entity objects with attribute values, but it does not update that array when any of the returned entities' attributes or other values changes. So it's certain, then, that the attributes will go stale in the result array.

                                          For the next build, I will change the definition of this function to return canonical entity IDs only, rather than entity objects, so you will have to use getEntity() in your each over the results, as you did with your test_array example, and this will ensure that you are always looking at the latest attributes. You can test this theory now by modifying your each for d_failure_list to use getEntity( id.canonical_id ).

                                          tunnusT Offline
                                          tunnusT Offline
                                          tunnus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @toggledbits did what you suggested, but situation didn't really change, array is still empty:

                                          Screenshot 2021-09-30 at 19.25.05.png

                                          Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                                          CrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Set Reaction > Script Action
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            6
                                            86

                                          • Wiring Samotech SM308-S into light fitting
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            0
                                            2
                                            44

                                          • Errors after updating to MQTTController build 25139
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            6
                                            75

                                          • 🎉 My very first MSR controller: OpenSprinkler
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            5
                                            13
                                            631

                                          • Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
                                            T
                                            tamorgen
                                            0
                                            5
                                            98

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            122
                                            37.3k

                                          • Z-Wave Future....
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            5
                                            180

                                          • Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            136

                                          • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
                                            wmarcolinW
                                            wmarcolin
                                            0
                                            7
                                            265

                                          • Disaster recovery and virtualisation
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            5
                                            705

                                          • Remote access of Zwave stick from Z-wave server
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            431
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved