I need a handful of victims volunteers to help test previews of the next build of Reactor. A long-standing request was for "a simple login mechanism," but in practice, adding user authentication and competent access control turned out to be a pretty big project with a lot of big changes on both server and client sides. It's a bit more than I'm comfortable testing myself and springing out to everyone at once, so I'd like to work with a small group to put it through "sea trials."
Major changes/features include:
User authentication with hashed password storage; User group configuration with application restriction (admin, dashboard, API); Detailed control over API access, with user- and token-based authentication/authorization; Improvements to the HTTPS service; Improvements to UI coordination with the core for Rules and Reactions.If this sounds like something you'd like to help with, drop me a reply here in this thread or privately.
I have a case where I'm trying to send a MQTT message similar to the example below:
Topic: pool/set { "command": 4, "value": 1, "time": 0, "interval": 0 }But I need to set "value" so that it is an integer between 20-30. I thought I could use "dimming" capability here, but there's probably a better way. @therealdb ?
(Using userauth-24120-7745fb8d build in Docker)
There's a filtering capability for entities in reactor.yaml, but I have a case where I don't want to filter an entity altogether, but would like to "throttle" it, as this sensor updates every 1-2 seconds (and therefore unnecessarily takes database space).
Sensor data comes through home assistant, and seems that there's no way to control update interval at that end.
So I'm asking if plugin configuration could support limiting/throttling updates for certain entities?
Good morning,
Hopefully this is a simple request. I believe the title should be self explanatory, but just in case, I'll elaborate.
On the status tab, we all get alerts if a device state has changed (i.e., been removed). This is great, but when I go into the entities tab, I have to either type the name (or a portion thereof) of the device that has been removed, or I need to scroll all the way through my list of devices. This is infrequent, however, yesterday I replaced a failed device in my HAAS environment. It was a Z-Wave switch that is added using the Smart Scan QR code, which normally makes it pretty easy. However, some devices don't get fully added the first time around, so it'll add multiple entries into HAAS until it get's the S2 authentication correct and the device fully included. It did this to me yesterday, and I had to delete the incomplete device from my installation. MSR still saw the entities of that failed/incomplete switch entity, and I was left with 8 alerts and entities that I needed to removed.
It's not a huge problem, but this example was just one switch. If I were to add replace multiple devices at once, this could be a bit more annoying to remove. It would be helpful to be able to filter by removed entities, so I can find them all quickly and delete them. Continuing that train of thought, it would also be useful to have check boxes next to those lines, and perhaps do a select all type of thing so they could be deleted in one mouse click.
@toggledbits I have finally finished up the SSL using Let's Encrypt and am getting this from my local browser:
f3d0ac22-272e-46c1-b7e3-57b08bdd1555-image.png
21c04fe1-1760-4ce6-a4de-2285d3349940-image.png
3a7022db-5add-40a1-b9a2-0c0b97fa211b-image.png
I know you said in the docs that using a self-signed could lead to this but this is LE.
Hi @toggledbits,
I don't know if I'm the only one, so I'm reporting here first instead of opening a bug.
Basically, with the latest 2-3 updates of Reactor and MQTTController, after a restart previous statuses are lost (for both Virtual and MQTT entities), until they're restored.
It's particularly annoying for Virtual Entities, because I have to set them all over again (I've coded some defaults at startup if the values are empty, but sometimes these are not the correct values before the update).
Not easy to reproduce, and logs are gone, but the first time I tought it was me hallucinating, the second one didn't bother too much, after the third I realized it's something not coming from me.
the behavior could be seen in this screenshot:
1c007fc2-4dbc-4476-8dca-e5aa111e4642-image.png
Any hint is appreciated.
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only).
Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package:
Contrib MQTT templates for Reactor. Contribute to dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib development by creating an account on GitHub.
Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go.
I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them.
The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression.
Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests 🙂
Good morning,
So Home Assistant decided to change the default weather home format that I've been using for the past year and a half. I had two Global Expressions set up to pull the high and low temp forecast for the day. Now it's pulling null values.
094c9205-cc9e-4fcc-ac4f-1bf54acea299-image.png
In the dev tools, it now uses a new service (Weather. get forecasts), plural, where the old Weather.get forecast is depreciated and now longer functions.
8c7a1fcc-dd3f-4268-a0b7-29d542f86adc-image.png
It shows a templow field, and a temperature field, which I presume is the forecast high.
When I head back over to MSR, I'm having a hard time finding those values in the Entities tab.
c5ea1048-a72e-4647-9c50-9d0c5fd20767-image.png
wx.asoftime=null wx.ceiling=null wx.ceiling_unit=null wx.cloud_cover=null wx.condition_code=null wx.description="partlycloudy" wx.feels_like=null wx.humidity=57 wx.humidity_unit="%" wx.icon=null wx.location=null wx.precipitation_1hr=null wx.precipitation_24hr=null wx.precipitation_other=null wx.precipitation_type=null wx.precipitation_unit="in" wx.pressure=30 wx.pressure_unit="inHg" wx.temperature=55 wx.temperature_unit="°F" wx.visibility=null wx.visibility_unit="mi" wx.wind_compass=210.3 wx.wind_conditions=null wx.wind_direction="SSW" wx.wind_gust=null wx.wind_speed=6.28 wx.wind_speed_unit="mph" x_hass.domain="weather" x_hass.entity_id="weather.forecast_home" x_hass.services=["weather"] x_hass.state="partlycloudy" x_hass_attr.attribution="Weather forecast from met.no, delivered by the Norwegian Meteorological Institute." x_hass_attr.cloud_coverage=85.9 x_hass_attr.dew_point=40 x_hass_attr.friendly_name="New Windsor Weather" x_hass_attr.humidity=57 x_hass_attr.precipitation_unit="in" x_hass_attr.pressure=30 x_hass_attr.pressure_unit="inHg" x_hass_attr.supported_features=3 x_hass_attr.temperature=55 x_hass_attr.temperature_unit="°F" x_hass_attr.visibility_unit="mi" x_hass_attr.wind_bearing=210.3 x_hass_attr.wind_speed=6.28 x_hass_attr.wind_speed_unit="mph"There is a x_hass_attr.temperature, but that appears to be the current temperature, not the high that I found on the dev tools screenshot.
Any ideas?
Running:
Core
2024.4.3
Supervisor
2024.04.0
Operating System
12.2
Frontend
20240404.2
MSR: latest-24057-e9add9f5
Hey Patrick, I recently have been noticing that MSR has been acting up ie. it's been needing restarts and has been slow. I began trouble shooting by looking at the logs and have noticed the following errors for a lot of entities. I thought maybe a simple reboot of RPi was needed and I kept seeing the same errors in the system logs. I am oddly enough not seeing these same errors in the MSR logs. Where things started getting weird is whenever I rebooted MSR it wouldn't come back online .I would have to restart the RPi then it would come back online. I just restarted MSR again to capture logs and it restarted fine, so I guess its good for now? I think this is more or so a corrupted SD card issue rather a MSR issue but well being troubleshooting from here. The SD card is about 1-2 years old.
Apologies if this post is everywhere, I cannot consistently recreate any oddities that are happening, that's what is leading me to believe my SD is going bad.
PS: If anyone knows how to diagnose a corrupt SD card please chime in.
MSR latest-24057-e9add9f5
Home Assistant 2024.4.3
Raspberry Pi 3b+
This system has been running flawlessly year after year for the time changes twice a year literally since MSR came out so I was caught off-guard when this happened this morning.
Time in MSR browser is EST, time on RPi is local time (DST).
76ed5313-b9b9-46d4-b0f9-462c40e99750-image.png
195e61c5-58a7-4453-b96a-18cebae75550-image.png
I've rebooted the RPi I've restarted MSR after double-checking the time on the RPi. Used a completely different browser to eliminate any caching concerns. Double-checked MSR reactor.yamla5f23151-d691-4343-8499-8e77a55528e5-image.png
What am I missing here @toggledbits ?
Hi,
For the standard capabilities MSR sends both a value record and a units record to InfluxDB. The latter I would like not to send as they are not really any use for me and it will reduce the number of records send to my InfluxDB.
Is there a quick way to do this with a filter_entities line like: *>units?
Or do I have to update all capabilities to read like this:
power_sensor:
attributes:
value: true
Cheers Rene
I'm trying to replicate this
wallbox_set_number.PNG
into a MQTT entity where I could set a number with a min and max value.
I can't find a standard capability that fits or any documentation on local MQTT capabilities and the only post on the forum mentioning local MQTT capabilities is this post, is it even possible in current release?
My trial and error work in local_mqtt_capabilities.yaml isn't much to show as it's just a copy of mqtt_capabilities.yaml with changed names and then I got stuck.
Any guidance, examples, documentation, future feature request or denial would be much appreciated, thanks!
Reactor 24057-e9add9f5 bare metal
MQTTController 24050
Hi guys,
I've recently bought a new Govee outdoor permanent lights set, and I love it. WAF is pretty high, and the product is good quality. I hope to never run lights in the front of the house.
This new addition has found me searching for something to control these lights, locally. Govee has officials remote and LAN APIs and Home Assistant has it supported, but some undocumented stuff that's integrated into an Homebridge plugin that seems very promising. Without this plugin, my playlist is orchestrated via the cloud and that makes zero sense.
In the past I got some inspiration from plugins running on other platforms and Homebridge seems one of the most active. I could map its devices via HomeKit-local on HA, but I've decommissioned Homebridge years ago when we settled to Alexa (and I want to stay simple), so I had an idea: why get inspiration and rewrite things, when you could write an Homebridge adapter that could load any Homebridge plugin and run them natively under Reactor (MSR)?
I'm not sure if that's viable or made any sense, so I'm posting here to get feedback, encouragement and your thoughts. Anyone could be potentially interested in such a thing?
Hi- looking for a hint in where to start. My goal is to set a PIN code in a zwave kwikset lock triggered in a rule.
The device isn’t exposing methods to help. The x-hass.call-service looks promising, but what would the service name be?
Plan b would be send the zwave controller a config command- I don’t see any way to explicitly send a command through JS Zwave in my environment.
Running reactor bare metal. JS Zwave is running as an add on inside HASS OS.
Any tips are appreciated.
Hey crew, I'm trying to use MSR to control the RGB values of a Z-Wave bulb in Home Assistant.
Problem I'm running into - I would like to use 'rgb_color.set' to control this, but it doesn't work, instead it always passes the values '255,255,255' to HA no matter what values I enter within MSR.
More notes and examples below - I'm wondering if this is a formatting issue that I'm missing? Thanks for any help!
NOTES FROM TROUBLESHOOTING:
'rgb_color.set_rgb' works successfully, which seems strange. You'd think they would both be affected I've tried a couple different formats, like adding quotes, adding/removing spaces between the RGB values, nothing has fixed it.EXAMPLES:
When I use 'rgb_color.set_rgb', the values successfully carry over to Home Assistant:
f0f4befc-a642-428e-8923-e5f856ca7e2b-image.png
0af0a4f8-50b9-4100-b1e8-52a0de4cbcbb-image.png
But when I use 'rgb_color.set', the values DO NOT successfully carry over to Home Assistant:
9e2d7004-8085-4b70-bb3e-45614b7260a0-image.png 0d630228-c74b-4db8-89bd-2572a08608a3-image.png
DETAILS:
Bulb is LZW42 by Inovelli MSR version: stable-23242-5ee8e1d4HA DETAILS
Core 2024.2.5 Supervisor 2024.02.1 Operating System 12.0Hi,
I’m running MSR in a docker container on my Synology Nas. The container is automatically updated using watchtower weekly.
It was working. Now, after the update, Reactor webpage is able to load, and all indications on the webpage suggests that it is working fine. However, the updated statuses from Home Assistant and Vera are not being detected.
The container logs show the following error
Reactor stable-23344-5aad7754 app 23344 configuration from /var/reactor/config NODE_PATH /opt/reactor:/opt/reactor/node_modules [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:49.516Z <app:null> Reactor build stable-23344-5aad7754 starting on v16.15.1 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:49.517Z <app:null> Process ID 1 user/group 0/0; docker; platform linux/x64 #69057 SMP Fri Jan 12 17:02:28 CST 2024; locale (undefined) [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:49.517Z <app:null> Basedir /opt/reactor; data in /var/reactor/storage [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:49.517Z <app:null> NODE_PATH=/opt/reactor:/opt/reactor/node_modules [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:49.696Z <Structure:null> Module Structure v23172 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:49.698Z <Capabilities:null> Module Capabilities v23331 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:49.780Z <Plugin:null> Module Plugin v22300 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:49.790Z <TimerBroker:null> Module TimerBroker v22283 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:49.794Z <Entity:null> Module Entity v22353 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:49.866Z <Controller:null> Module Controller v23069 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.030Z <default:null> Module Ruleset v22293 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.031Z <default:null> Module Rulesets v22146 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.066Z <GlobalExpression:null> Module GlobalExpression v23211 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.581Z <Predicate:null> Module Predicate v23093 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.595Z <AlertManager:null> Module AlertManager v22283 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.600Z <Rule:null> Module Rule v23107 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.614Z <GlobalReaction:null> Module GlobalReaction v22324 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.617Z <Engine:null> Module Engine v23339 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.635Z <httpapi:null> Module httpapi v23058 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.680Z <wsapi:null> Module wsapi v23172 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.789Z <TaskQueue:null> Module TaskQueue 21351 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.790Z <VeraController:null> Module VeraController v23109 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:50.971Z <HassController:null> Module HassController v23344 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:51.716Z <DynamicGroupController:null> Module DynamicGroupController v22313 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:52.253Z <SystemController:null> Module SystemController v23331 i18n: missing en-US language string: The version of nodejs you are using ({0}) is now end-of-life, and so is deprecated for use with Reactor. Please upgrade nodejs to {2}.{3} or higher as soon as possible; the current LTS version is recommended. Releases of Reactor produced after {1} will not run under this version of nodejs at all. [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:52.256Z <Controller:CRIT> SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input [-] SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input at JSON.parse (<anonymous>) at /opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:464:51 at Array.forEach (<anonymous>) at SystemController._restoreEntities (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:458:36) at new Controller (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:45:42) at new SystemController (/opt/reactor/server/lib/SystemController.js:29:9) at /opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:101:37 Trace: The version of nodejs you are using ({0}) is now end-of-life, and so is deprecated for use with Reactor. Please upgrade nodejs to {2}.{3} or higher as soon as possible; the current LTS version is recommended. Releases of Reactor produced after {1} will not run under this version of nodejs at all. at _T (/opt/reactor/server/lib/i18n.js:468:37) at AlertManager.addAlert (/opt/reactor/server/lib/AlertManager.js:126:25) at /opt/reactor/app.js:381:140 [stable-23344]2024-02-28T21:57:59.313Z <app:CRIT> SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input [-] SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input at JSON.parse (<anonymous>) at IndividualFileStrategy.getDataObject (/opt/reactor/server/lib/IndividualFileStrategy.js:114:54) at DelayWriteCacheStrategy.getDataObject (/opt/reactor/server/lib/DelayWriteCacheStrategy.js:87:50) at Container.getDataObject (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Container.js:69:67) at Function.getInstance (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Data.js:37:179) at Rule.getRuleStates (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Rule.js:507:100) at Rule.getConditionState (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Rule.js:538:47) at new Rule (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Rule.js:378:47) at Function.getInstance (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Rule.js:387:36) at /opt/reactor/server/lib/Engine.js:263:53 i18n: missing en-US language string: HomeAssistant on {0:q} may be an unsupported version. The reported version ({1}) has not been certified/tested with this version of Reactor and may cause errors. You must either modify your HomeAssistant install, or see if an update to Reactor has been made available. Trace: HomeAssistant on {0:q} may be an unsupported version. The reported version ({1}) has not been certified/tested with this version of Reactor and may cause errors. You must either modify your HomeAssistant install, or see if an update to Reactor has been made available. at _T (/opt/reactor/server/lib/i18n.js:468:37) at AlertManager.addAlert (/opt/reactor/server/lib/AlertManager.js:126:25) at HassController.sendWarning (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:197:36) at /opt/reactor/server/lib/HassController.js:1117:370 at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)I’ve tried using “latest-amd64” and it does not work either. The logs show similar json input error.
Reactor latest-24057-e9add9f5 app 24052 configuration from /var/reactor/config NODE_PATH /opt/reactor:/opt/reactor/node_modules [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.466Z <app:null> Reactor build latest-24057-e9add9f5 starting on v20.10.0 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.522Z <app:null> Process ID 1 user/group 0/0; docker; platform linux/x64 #69057 SMP Fri Jan 12 17:02:28 CST 2024; locale (undefined) [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.522Z <app:null> Basedir /opt/reactor; data in /var/reactor/storage [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.522Z <app:null> NODE_PATH=/opt/reactor:/opt/reactor/node_modules [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.667Z <Structure:null> Module Structure v23172 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.673Z <Capabilities:null> Module Capabilities v23331 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.780Z <Plugin:null> Module Plugin v22300 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.787Z <TimerBroker:null> Module TimerBroker v22283 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.791Z <Entity:null> Module Entity v22353 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.796Z <Controller:null> Module Controller v23069 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.811Z <default:null> Module Ruleset v22293 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.811Z <default:null> Module Rulesets v22146 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.821Z <GlobalExpression:null> Module GlobalExpression v23211 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.890Z <Predicate:null> Module Predicate v23093 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:30.958Z <AlertManager:null> Module AlertManager v22283 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.027Z <Rule:null> Module Rule v24057 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.033Z <GlobalReaction:null> Module GlobalReaction v22324 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.036Z <Engine:null> Module Engine v24023 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.042Z <httpapi:null> Module httpapi v24057 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.216Z <wsapi:null> Module wsapi v24057 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.296Z <TaskQueue:null> Module TaskQueue 21351 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.297Z <VeraController:null> Module VeraController v24050 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.365Z <HassController:null> Module HassController v24048 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.659Z <DynamicGroupController:null> Module DynamicGroupController v22313 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.668Z <SystemController:null> Module SystemController v23331 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:31.673Z <Controller:CRIT> SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input [-] SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input at JSON.parse (<anonymous>) at /opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:464:51 at Array.forEach (<anonymous>) at SystemController._restoreEntities (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:458:36) at new Controller (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:45:43) at new SystemController (/opt/reactor/server/lib/SystemController.js:237:9) at /opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:101:37 [latest-24057]2024-02-28T22:27:38.845Z <app:CRIT> SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input [-] SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input at JSON.parse (<anonymous>) at IndividualFileStrategy.getDataObject (/opt/reactor/server/lib/IndividualFileStrategy.js:51:45) at DelayWriteCacheStrategy.getDataObject (/opt/reactor/server/lib/DelayWriteCacheStrategy.js:89:49) at Container.getDataObject (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Container.js:69:65) at Data.getInstance (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Data.js:45:179) at Rule.getRuleStates (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Rule.js:515:101) at Rule.getConditionState (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Rule.js:546:47) at new Rule (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Rule.js:371:47) at Rule.getInstance (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Rule.js:380:36) at /opt/reactor/server/lib/Engine.js:828:53 i18n: missing en-US language string: HomeAssistant on {0:q} may be an unsupported version. The reported version ({1}) has not been certified/tested with this version of Reactor and may cause errors. You must either modify your HomeAssistant install, or see if an update to Reactor has been made available. Trace: HomeAssistant on {0:q} may be an unsupported version. The reported version ({1}) has not been certified/tested with this version of Reactor and may cause errors. You must either modify your HomeAssistant install, or see if an update to Reactor has been made available. at _T (/opt/reactor/server/lib/i18n.js:614:37) at AlertManager.addAlert (/opt/reactor/server/lib/AlertManager.js:128:25) at HassController.sendWarning (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:197:36) at /opt/reactor/server/lib/HassController.js:1133:374 at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)How do I fix this?
Noticed right away last night at closing time that the open/close had become inverted with the update to v23326.
It wasn't an awful bit of lift to change all Reactions to reflect the change but it was jarring initially when everything flipped.
Are there release notes on that version, @toggledbits ?
[Solved] Is there a cap or max number of devices a Global Reaction should not exceed?
-
@wmarcolin said in [Solved] Is there a cap or max number of devices a Global Reaction should not exceed?:
Just tell me what I should do that I will be promptly attending.
You are always helpful, and that's appreciated. For the moment, just run it as it comes. Let's see what happens. Start with a 25 for
action_pace
, and if you continue to have issues, move it up to 50. If 50 isn't enough, then I'll ask for logs. Let me know how it goes. -
OK, changed action_pace to 25 (it was 100), and upgraded to build 21351.
-
@toggledbits in this last upgrade process, I got these zombie processes. How is it possible to kill them? Thanks.
-
Stop Reactor. Then grab the
reactor.log
file and upload it to me. I'm going to DM you a link.After you've uploaded the log file, remove the
storage/states/reaction_queue.json
file and restart Reactor. -
@toggledbits done boss!!
-
I think that in another track you have also received this message, which is occurring exactly when running the above event of turning on several lights.
-
@wmarcolin Very good. That means the more aggressive checks are working. It appears that Hubitat's event socket is a good bit more fragile than its Hass equal. I will add an option to the next release to silence this warning (although the reconnect will still be logged in the log file). You should also be able to see the effect of the reconnects on the system entity's
x_hubitat_sys.reconnects
counter.For comparison, I don't get these errors unless I force them. The one restart shown below was because I upgraded the hub to 2.3.0.120.
-
TL;DR: Hubitat needs more aggressive WebSocket connection health tests and recovery, and that's been added as of 21351. When recovery is needed (which should be very rare), device states may be delayed up to 120 seconds. Don't use WiFi for your Reactor host or hub in production. If your Reactor host and hub aren't on the same network segment (LAN), you may see more reconnects. If you see reconnects when your Reactor host and hub are on the same network segment, you likely have a network quality issue.
I want to explain how I understand the problem reported, and how the fix (which is more of a workaround) works.
The events websocket is one of two channels used by HubitatController to get data from the hub. When HubitatController connects to the hub, it begins with a query to MakerAPI to fetch the bulk data for all devices -- "give me everything". Thereafter, the events socket provides (only) updates (changes). Being a WebSocket connection, it has a standard-required implementation of ping-pong that both serves to keep the connection alive and test the health of the connection. In Reactor, I use a standard library to provide the WebSocket implementation, and this library is in wide use, so while it's almost certainly not bug free (nothing is), it has sufficient exposure to be considered trustworthy. I imagine Hubitat does the same thing, but since it's a closed system, I don't know for sure; they may use something common, or they may have rolled their own, or they may have chosen some black sheep from among many choices for whatever reason. In any case, neither Hubitat nor Reactor implement the WebSocket protocol itself, we just use our respective WebSocket libraries to open and manage the connections and send/receive data.
Apparently there is a failure mode for the connection, and we don't know if it's on the Hubitat (Java) side or in the nodejs package, where the events can stop coming, but apparently the ping-pong mechanism continues to work for the connection, otherwise it would be torn down/flagged as closed/error by the libraries on both ends. There's no easy way to tell if Hubitat has stopped sending messages or the nodejs library has stopped receiving or passing them, and since the libraries/packages on both ends are black boxes as far as I'm concerned, I don't really care, I just want it to work better. So...
HubitatController versions prior to 21351 relied solely on the WebSocket's native ping-pong mechanism to describe connection health, as Reactor does for Hass and even its own UI-to-Engine connection (lending credence to the theory that the nodejs library is not the cause). But for Hubitat it appears the WebSocket ping-pong alone is not enough, so 21351 has introduced some additional tests at the application layer. If any of these fails, the connections are closed and re-opened. When reopened, a full device/state inventory is done again as usual, so the current state of all devices is reestablished. Any missed device updates during the "dead time" would be corrected by this inventory.
By the way, one of the things that exacerbates the problem with the Hubitat events WebSocket is that it's a one-way connection at its application later: Hubitat only transmits. There is no message I can send over the WebSocket for which I could expect a speedy reply as proof of health. I have to find other things to do through MakerAPI in an attempt to force Hubitat to send me data over the WebSocket, and this takes more time as well. If there was two-way communication, it would be a lot easier and faster to know if the connection was healthy.
So the question that remains, then, is what is that timing? By default, HubitatController will start its aggressive recovery at 60 seconds of channel silence. If the channel then remains silent for an additional 60 seconds, the close/re-open recovery occurs. So even if the connection fails, the maximum time to recovery and correct state of all devices will be just over 120 seconds. So even in worst-case conditions, entity states should not lag more than that. Given that these stalls are the exception rather than the rule for most users, these pauses should be rare.
There is one tuning parameter that may be useful to set on VPN connections or any other "distanced" connection (i.e. any connection where the Reactor host and the hub are not on the same network segment, and in particular may traverse connection-managing software or hardware like proxies, stateful packet inspection and intrusion detection systems, load balancers, etc.). That is
websocket_ping_interval
, which will be added to the next build. This will set the interval, in milliseconds, between pings (default 60000). This should be sufficiently narrow to prevent some VPNs from aborting the socket in some cases (see the WebSocket missive at the end), but if not, smaller values can be tried, at the expense of additional network traffic and a slight touch on CPU. If the reconnects don't improve significantly, a different VPN option should be chosen.And this brings me to two recommendations:
- You should not use a WiFi connection for either the Reactor host or hub in production use. These are fine for testing and experimentation, but are an inappropriate choice in production for both reliability and performance reasons.
- If you use a VPN between the Reactor host and the hub, "subscription VPNs" are probably best avoided, as these will be the most aggressive in connection management and cause the most disconnects and failures. That's because they are tuned for surfing web traffic and checking email, basically, where the connections are open-query-response-close — connections don't stay open very long, typically. There are optimizations of HTTP where connections are kept open after a response to allow for a follow-up query (e.g. request an embedded image after requesting a document), but these are generally much shorter than the expected infinite open of a WebSocket connection (more on this at the bottom). Point-to-point VPNs that you set up and manage yourself are likely to provide better stability and performance (e.g. PPTP, SSH tunnels, etc.).
I will also add this: in my network, I do not get Hubitat WebSocket stalls and reconnects. I have had to force them through various devious means to test the behavior I've just implemented. I owned a commercial data center in the San Francisco Bay Area, with a managed network offered to clients with 100% uptime service level agreements. I built and maintained that network. My home network is a reflection of that — good quality equipment, meticulous cabling, sensible architecture (scaled down appropriately for the lesser scope and demands), and active data collection and monitoring. My network runs clean, and when there are problems, I know it (and where). If your Reactor host and Hubitat hub are on the same network segment, hardwired and not WiFi, and you are getting reconnects, I think you should audit your network quality. Something isn't happy. It only takes one bad cable, or one bad connector on one end of one cable, to cause a lot of problems.
---
For anyone interested, one reason why WebSockets can be troublesome in network environments where connection management may be done between the endpoints is that a WebSocket typically begins its life as an HTTP request. The client makes an HTTP request to the server with specific headers that ask that the connection to be "converted" (they call it "upgraded") from HTTP to WebSocket. If the server agrees, the connection becomes persistent and a new session layer is introduced. But because the connection starts as HTTP, any interstitial proxy or device that is managing the connection as it passes through may mistake it for a plain HTTP (web page) request, and when the connection doesn't tear itself down after a short period the proxy/device thinks is reasonable for HTTP requests, it forces the issue and sends a disconnect to both ends. This is necessary because tracking open connections consumes memory and CPU on these devices, and in a commercial ISP environment this could mean tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of open connections at a single interface/gateway. So to keep from being overwhelmed, these devices may just time out those connections (on a predictable schedule/timeout, or just due to load), but because it's not really an HTTP connection at that point (it's been upgraded to a WebSocket), the proxy/device is breaking a connection that both the server and client expect to be persistent, and that can then cause all kinds of problems, the most benign of which is forcing the two endpoints to reconnect frequently and waste a lot of time and bandwidth doing it. On a LAN, you typically don't have these problems, because the two endpoints have no stateful management between them (network switches, if present between, just pass traffic, not manage connections), so barring network problems, there's no reason for them to be disconnected until either asks to close.
-
@toggledbits master!
Another lesson in knowledge, and dedication to understanding and solving problems.
Well, I spent two days reading your post before trying to answer anything.
First starting from the end, in my case my network is all Giga, CAT7 cables with industrial connectors. All the cabling of the house came with cables ready to not run the risk of redoing connectors. Then I even hired a company to certify the network, which also uses management switches that I can validate the network. So ping inside my house between any equipment is < 1ms.
From the technical side what I see is that the connection between MSR and Hubitat is fragile, and it becomes even more so when MSR is much faster in its actions without Hubitat responses.
What you would be doing for a future version is strengthening the validation of this communication, in particular, to return the status of given orders. That is, if you tell the MSR to turn on a light, make sure that the return state says that the light is on.
I was in doubt, in case of saying that it was not turned on, would there be a reset? Could this be a summary?
-
Ping (and traceroute) are not network quality tools. They are path tools. To measure link quality, since you said you had managed switches, you'd need to look at the error counts on each port. That may be worth a squiz.
As @Alan_F has observed, you can get restarts from a quiet channel that is just naturally quiet. If you don't have a lot of devices, and things aren't changing often, it's very likely to see a quiet channel. HubitatController probes by picking a device and making it refresh, which usually causes some event activity on the WebSocket channel. But it's possible that the device it picks (randomly) may not do much when refreshed. You can set
probe_device
to the device ID (number) of a device that consistently causes events when asked to refresh to mitigate that random effect. That may take some experimentation, using the Hubitat UI to ask devices to refresh, and watching for green highlights in the Reactor Entities list. When you find a device that consistent "lights" when you refresh it on Hubitat, you've probably got a reliable probe device.I have noted in my own network that certain devices (that shall be unnamed) are sufficiently chatty that I'm at no risk of a quiet channel. Let's just say anything that monitors energy is a good canary in the mine.
-
The ping tests were to validate the connection, speed, below is the screen of the switch that the MSR and Hubitat are on, no errors. I have a weekly reset programmed, so this information is from last Friday until now.
Ok, so what I should set now is a device connection probe, something like the APP Device Watchdog. I'm going this way.
Anyway, I think I mentioned before, I ended up moving Hubitat far away from my wifi router on Saturday, and since last night after deactivating the devices again one by one, I started rebuilding my mesh. I already see good results with the move away, several devices that previously had trouble responding, now seem to work better. Hopefully, by Wednesday I will have finished the rebuild, and will be able to check how the network behavior and ping-pong between MSR and Hubitat is now with the latest version of MSR.
Thanks.
-
Very good. In my limited experience with this new heuristic, Z-Wave devices seem to be the most predictable for probes among the basic devices. In the current build, whatever you choose must support the
Refresh
(Hubitat native) capability (akax_hubitat_Refresh
in Reactor). In the next build, the config valueprobe_action
will be available to let you use a different action, if you need to, andprobe_parameters
(an object) containing any key/value parameter pairs that the command may need (optional).I've also found that the "Hub Information" app (or more correctly, the device that this app manages) makes a good probe target. It has some useful data, and also very reliably updates fields when commanded to do so, even at a high frequency, so the next build will have specific support for this app/device if it finds it among the hub's inventory.
-
@toggledbits hi!
I have been operating for two days with version 23360, and the chaos described in the messages above is no longer happening. The recurrent failures of leaving an action without executing as a whole are no longer oberved.
Thanks for all your efforts!
A question, in version 21353 we started seeing the message below, which you made possible after deactivating the alert.
Is it possible to make some kind of query, or trigger some action when this message happens? I would like for example to send a Telegram to notify me.
Thanks.
-
Yes, there are at least two ways to do that now. Any thoughts on where you might look?
Edit: Same question as this thread: https://smarthome.community/topic/832/identifying-when-msr-cannot-connect-to-home-assistant
And this thread is wandering, so maybe let's leave it alone.
-
-
Hi, I asked @toggledbits to reopen this very long thread, to give a testimony of a situation that I believe can help others.
I apologize for the long message, let's recapitulate the history.
The discussion was based on possible device limits on MSR actions, which Patrick explained there would not be, but the situation described was very similar to the scenario I posted in my message, of numerous failures on actions sent from MSR to Hubitat (December 16, 12:28am). That MSR was much faster than Hubitat could process.
I posted an example where I had to execute a series of Reactions that would turn on lights, and also turn on outlets, it always failed, I demonstrated that the MSR would activate everything, but Hubitat would not execute.
Then came the topic and orientation that my Hubitat should not be next to my WiFi router that could be interfering with the Hubitat signal, I even sent a picture on December 17 and provided the change %(#ff8000)[(TIP 1)].
Well obviously, as the change of position was big, I had to redo 3 times the entire mesh network, adding and removing devices. I followed the instruction of many masters, do the network from the center, i.e., from Hubitat to the outside, including first devices that use electric power because they are repeaters, and then those with exclusive battery power %(#ff8000)[(TIP 2)].
Well, our friend Patrick releases version 21351 and then 23360 where he adds much more aggressive management in the communication MSR x Hubitat, it improved a lot. But unfortunately, I kept having problems.
Then I asked for help again to go forward and see what to do to improve, we entered in the theme that several posts from the Hubitat community mentioned devices that use the S0 security, that this creates problems in the mesh network by high traffic of unnecessary information, new action remove and include again the devices that had S0 %(#ff8000)[(TIP 3)], another action that helped the network. What was not possible, we reactivated the Vera hub and put these devices back in, removing them from the Hubitat network.
We were evolving, but the situation persisted, actions that triggered many actions to Hubitat could still have failures, and the worst actions using Hubitat's own dashboard were also not being executed.
Well, I returned to the discussion of when I changed the Vera to Hubitat, which highlighted several points of change, but one very bothered me, the Hubitat Z-Wave signal, much weaker than the vera (https://smarthome.community/topic/776/switching-from-vera-to-hubitat/9?_=1644189698709).
Well 4 days ago (2/2), moved by the courage I opened my Hubitat and followed the post (https://community.hubitat.com/t/external-antenna/81396/28) %(#ff8000)[(TIP 4)], and installed an external antenna for z-wave, here I show that I bought and installed (https://community.hubitat.com/t/elevation-c7-possible-faulty-z-wave-radio/52977/91). In this post the discussion started with the theme S0 and S2, and went into the antenna theme.
MY TESTIMONY OF WHAT HAPPENED
A revolution, my Hubitat got a new life, it is another equipment:
- Before I had 15 direct devices in the hub, today after 4 days there are already 36 of 64, and I see that every day is increasing as the network is being restructured. There was the absurdity of equipment in the same environment as the HE, but behind a column, using two other devices to reach the HE that was less than 4 meters away, now communicates directly;
- There was almost no equipment that communicated at 100kbps, most were between 9.6 and 40, now most are already 100, and a small number, 5/64 are at 9.6 kbps;
- Remember the thing where I had to turn on several lights and power outlets all together? it didn't fail anymore, as the devices speak better and faster like the HE, I don't see this failure anymore;
- I also talked about actions commanded by the Dashboard that the device did not respond to, it is not happening anymore either.
In summary, in my case that 3/4 of the devices are not repeaters, they use batteries, my z-wave mesh network had a lack of repeaters, and this generated a generalized degradation. Now, with this better signal, if not eliminated the problem, I reduced it to almost zero.
Now pay attention, the operation of putting up the external antenna seems simple, but it is not. The antenna connector that is soldered to the board is very small and difficult to handle. So if you go this way, look for a cell phone repair shop, they will surely have the best technique for this change.
Thank you, and sorry again for the long message.
@gwp1 maybe this can help if you still have a problem. Your tip to move the HE away from the Wifi was also precious, thank you.
@SweetGenius your comment that there might be an overwhelming in the hub was correct, the action_pace action was a help, but the signal improvement I describe was the solution when I have a more fast response of the devices, reducing the overwhelm. Thanks.
@toggledbits our last messages, before I wanted to incinerate Hubitat, also helped a lot on the way. Thank you for all your dedication.
-