I was unable to get MQTT to work correctly in openluup... I had to give up... It's a real shame ... as ZwaveJS is by far the best thing I've seen to manage zwave networks.
R
ronluna
@ronluna
Use case:
When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled.
To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work.
Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch.
In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR.
Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR.
If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR.
Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
@toggledbits, not sure if this is a feature request or I'm using the search tool wrong. You have a "Search for rule" in the Rules Set tab in MSR. It works nicely to find a rule and bring up said rule, but can it/could it be used for as a "where used?" global search? For instance, I have a fairly large set of rules, divided up into 10 different rulesets. There's easily a hundred individual rules, and many of the rules have Rule State triggers, which of course refer to other rules. Amongst my troubleshooting today, I came across what may have been a duplicate or troubleshooting attempt, but I can't tell if it's actually used as a Rule State in another rule without opening each rule that I suspect it may be a part of.
Thanks.
Hi Smart Home Community.
I have used a Sonos inline WiFi switch to make one of my light fittings smart, but it requires a hard reset for WiFi changes, plus it isn't zigbee compatible, which means I can't use the Hue app to control it with the rest of the lights.
To that end I bought a Samotech SM308-S as it is recommended as the better than the Sonos equivalent.
I am however not exactly sure how to wire it in.
The manual is available here
Can anyone help me by clarifying which ports I need to use, and whether I should be using the live or switched live line for live etc.
I will be keeping using standard switches for a while, although hope to upgrade to tap dials once I have all the fittings upgraded.
Thanks
I'm running MSR build 25139 on Docker, using MQTT controller 24293, and everything working as expected. But if I try to upgrade to MQTTController build 25139, I'm getting the following errors on MSR UI:
An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.god
Last 11:20:37
An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.green
Last 11:20:37
An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.red
Last 11:20:37
An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto run" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.pump
Last 11:20:37
An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa watchdog" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.status
Last 11:20:37
My MQTT configuration (local_mqtt_devices.yaml) for the related entity is:
layzspa_message:
type: ValueSensor
capabilities: ["temperature_sensor", "value_sensor", "power_sensor"]
primary_attribute: power_sensor.value
events:
"layzspa/message":
"power_sensor.value":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.PWR )'
expr: "float(payload.PWR)"
"value_sensor.air":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AIR )'
expr: "float(payload.AIR)"
"value_sensor.pump":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.FLT )'
expr: "float(payload.FLT)"
"value_sensor.god":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GOD )'
expr: "float(payload.GOD)"
"value_sensor.lock":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.LCK )'
expr: "float(payload.LCK)"
"value_sensor.unit":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.UNT )'
expr: "float(payload.UNT)"
"value_sensor.error":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.ERR )'
expr: "float(payload.ERR)"
"temperature_sensor.green":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GRN )'
expr: "float(payload.GRN)"
"temperature_sensor.red":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.RED )'
expr: "float(payload.RED)"
"temperature_sensor.target":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TGT )'
expr: "float(payload.TGT)"
"temperature_sensor.value":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TMP )'
expr: "float(payload.TMP)"
"temperature_sensor.virtual":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.VTM )'
expr: "round(float(payload.VTM), 1)"
"temperature_sensor.ambient":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AMB )'
expr: "float(payload.AMB)"
"layzspa/Status":
"value_sensor.status":
if_expr: '! isnull( payload )'
expr: "payload"
"layzspa/button":
"value_sensor.button":
if_expr: '! isnull( payload )'
expr: "payload"
and in reactor.yaml I have:
"layzspa_states":
name: "Lay-Z-Spa States"
friendly_name: 'Lay-Z-Spa States'
include: layzspa_message
I realize my MQTT configuration might be a bit unorthodox, but could there still be something unintentional in the latest MQTTController build? If needed, I can provide detailed logs.
Since today is my birthday - and I still pretend to be unconventional - I'm giving away a present to this wonderful community and I'm releasing my first OpenSprinkler controller for MSR. It was real fun to code it - and while it's still WIP, it seems to work OK for me. It's polling-based at the moment, but I'll add support for updates via MQTT very soon (it's already partially coded).
Get it at (install is similar to MQTTController and such):
https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-opensprinkler
Feel free to try it. It's beta software, but it's stable. I'll update it weekly until all the tasks from my todo list are empty.
Since I've learnt a lot from this controller, I'll explore new controllers soon.
Good day all,
I'm in the process of trying to shut down my 10 year old Linux home server that served many purposes, but primarily it's what I used for my NAS/Plex Media server. I migrated the NAS aspect of the server in November of last year to a true NAS solution (Ubiquti UNAS Pro), which is rack mount and much more efficient than my old tower, which it's only side benefit was heating my home office during the winter. Unfortunately it also means heating my home office during the summer, which were about to be in full swing.
I have two things running on this 10 year old server at this point. MSR and pi-hole. I'm running Plex Media Server on Fedora Workstation in Podman on mini PC, which is much more energy efficient than my old tower. My next step is to migrate MSR. I know there are images of MSR out there, and creating it is well documented. I'm going to be using Podman instead of Docker for various reasons, but they work very similar. What I don't know, is what I need to do to migrate my existing Bare Metal installation over to a container.
Has anyone done this? Any advice?
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions;
Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating;
Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later;
Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase;
Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions;
Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases);
Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Following on from my last thread, some progress has been made over the weekend.
With 18G of spanky RAM in my Synology DS224+. I've jumped into the murky world of virtualisation and already eliminated the need for two Raspberry Pi's from my system.
Home Assistant: In theory they provide an OVA file which is supported by the Synology. I couldn't get it to work, however, so grabbed a copy of the .img file they supply, renamed it .iso and imported it as a VM. Restored from my full back up and that all seems fantastic.
Minidnla Music server: Trivial. Grabbed a Debian .iso for Bookworm and copied that onto the NAS. Created a new machine which mirrored the specs of the Raspberry Pi, booted from the ISO then did an expert install. Once that was all stable with a basic core of stuff and networking, I've made a copy of that as a good base system. Then fired up minidnla on it, mounted my media and that's also woking. Not bad for a short weekend's work.
Still not sure about the main NUC though. I'm thinking of buying a new USB stick so I can mess around getting it working on the Synology before I do anything drastic.
Once that hurdle is sorted I'm torn between:
Using a brand new install of Bookworm, re-installing Z-way server, OpenLuup, AltUI, MSR and HA bridge, then restoring across or
Making an ISO of the current system, importing that and upgrading in place (which will be pretty risk free since I can snapshot everything before I make any changes.)
Decisions, decisions.
C
Hi guys,
Just wondering how you guys organize your rule sets and rules. I wish I had an extra layer to have some more granularity, but my feature request was not popular.
Maybe there are better ways to organize my rule sets.
I use the rule sets now primarily for rooms. So a rule set per room. But maybe grouping by functionality works better. Any examples/ suggestions would be appreciated.
Posts
-
ZWaveJS and MQTT -
openLuup: MQTT serverIf there is something I can do to help, please let me know.
-
openLuup: MQTT serverI had to disable the MQTT Handler from the startup as it was crashing the entire engine.
-
openLuup: MQTT server@akbooer with DEBUG enabled the logs show:
2022-03-20 15:54:54.501 openLuup.mqtt:: CONNECT tcp{client}: 0x55ae0e8b8318 2022-03-20 15:54:54.501 openLuup.mqtt:: ClientId: ZWAVE_GATEWAY-Zwavejs2Mqtt 2022-03-20 15:54:54.501 openLuup.mqtt:: WillTopic: zwave/_CLIENTS/ZWAVE_GATEWAY-Zwavejs2Mqtt/status 2022-03-20 15:54:54.501 openLuup.mqtt:: WillMessage: {"value":false} 2022-03-20 15:54:54.502 openLuup.mqtt:: UserName: ******** 2022-03-20 15:54:54.502 openLuup.mqtt:: Password: ******** 2022-03-20 15:54:54.502 openLuup.io.server:: MQTT:1829 connection closed tcp{client}: 0x55ae0a5f7e78 2022-03-20 15:54:54.502 openLuup.mqtt:: RECEIVE ERROR: closed tcp{client}: 0x55ae0a5f7e78 2022-03-20 15:54:54.519 openLuup.server:: request completed (16415 bytes, 2 chunks, 1068 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55ae0c39f788 2022-03-20 15:54:54.587 openLuup.server:: error 'closed' sending 6 bytes to tcp{client}: 0x55ae0dfce198 2022-03-20 15:54:54.587 openLuup.server:: ...only 0 bytes sent 2022-03-20 15:54:54.587 openLuup.server:: error 'closed' sending 94946 bytes to tcp{client}: 0x55ae0dfce198 2022-03-20 15:54:54.587 openLuup.server:: ...only 0 bytes sent 2022-03-20 15:54:54.587 openLuup.server:: error 'closed' sending 2 bytes to tcp{client}: 0x55ae0dfce198Seems like is related to what @toggledbits has shared a couple weeks ago. clues?
-
openLuup: MQTT serverI'm currently having a problem where the only way to get openluup to start processing messages from subscribed topics is by restarting the ZWaveJS service. When the ZWaveJS MQTT service is restarted the ZWaveJS Clients send the subscribe messages to openluup and only then is when messages start to get processed.
Testing with the following inserted in the startup:
local json = require "openLuup.json" function MyMQTThandler (topic, message) local info = json.decode (message) local currentLevel = info.value luup.variable_set ("urn:upnp-org:serviceId:Dimming1", "LoadLevelStatus", currentLevel, 68) luup.log("Processed") end luup.register_handler ("MyMQTThandler", "mqtt:zwave/Hallway_2/DImmer_1/38/0/currentValue")I Couldn't find anything on ZWaveJS nor in openluup that might explain this behavior and my short mqtt knowledge is not helpful either.
Any ideas?
-
openLuup: MQTT serverBased out L_ShellyBridge.lua I've created initial L_ZWaveBridge.lua made changes in virtualfilesystem.lua to create D_ZWaveBridge.xml, D_ZWaveBridge.json and subcribed to zwave topic. which is how the MQTT messages are sent from ZWaveJS2MQTT by default.
my startup lua looks like:
luup.attr_set ("openLuup.MQTT.Username", "*********") luup.attr_set ("openLuup.MQTT.Password", "*********") luup.attr_set ("openLuup.MQTT.Port", 1811) luup.attr_set ("openLuup.MQTT.PublishVariableUpdates", true) luup.attr_set ("openLuup.MQTT.DEBUG", true)With my short mqtt understanding ZWaveJS is connecting and authenticating just fine to openluup although I've been unable to properly modify L_ZWaveBridge.lua to capture and parse the messages that ZWaveJS is sending.
-
openLuup: MQTT serverWould be awesome to get ZWaveJS2Mqtt added to openluup. As much as ZWay has proven to be faster and much more reliable than Vera... ZWaveJS has a bright future...
-
io module async ?Maybe adding sockproxyd natively into openluup and modifying io.lua to optionally use sockproxyd could be a real winner to finally solve the limitations/problems in the I/O module.
-
io module async ?There is a little issue I'm currently facing with openluup and plugins that relies on io module.
If openluup is watching a variable that belongs to a devices that relies on io module and there is an action attached that also relies on io module, when that watcher gets triggered, the action in question will get processed in openluup (it will show in the logs) but the parent device won't process it.
I have a feeling that this could be due to io packets crossing between each others somehow modifying the final message received by the parent device. it's feels like the io communication is happening in the same room for all plugins and sometimes they get crossed. Wondering if anyone has experienced something of that sort and if there is a way to prevent it?
-
Apple Homepod mini@akbooer That's right... and just like that... apple is taking over then entire home automation industry.... too bad there is no Home app for Android. Well Front end and first layer voice control related...
-
Apple Homepod mini@akbooer get the latest copy directly from github at https://github.com/damianxd/homebridge-vera as npm is not current/synced with the github repo. In other words, install the plugin through the homebridge plugin section and then replace all the files located at "/usr/lib/node_modules/homebridge-vera/" with the latest on github.
-
BroadLink Mark II plugin@a-lurker the second broadlink device in the network is indeed Mini split A/C that uses AC Freedom app. Both device are well within the wifi range and working fine when using their native apps so I doubt the timeout message has something to do with the strength of the connection. What I've noticed in the past when I've seen a timeout like this is due to the socket expecting a special carrier return <CR> or something in that sort, simply not understanding what was sent back to it.
I'm not familiar with the RM communication protocol... Although I'm all ears to see what else We could try to get this off the ground.
2021-04-03 14:20:18.155 openLuup.scheduler:: [82] BroadLink-Mk2 device startup 2021-04-03 14:20:18.155 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Initialising plugin: BroadLink_Mk2 2021-04-03 14:20:18.155 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Using: Lua 5.1 2021-04-03 14:20:18.155 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: 0.57a --> PluginVersion 2021-04-03 14:20:18.155 luup.variable_set:: 82.urn:a-lurker-com:serviceId:BroadLink_Mk2_1.PluginVersion was: 0.57 now: 0.57a #hooks:0 2021-04-03 14:20:18.156 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Using: dkjson 2021-04-03 14:20:18.157 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Broadcasting discovery message 2021-04-03 14:20:18.157 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: 10.1.11.22 2021-04-03 14:20:19.157 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Number of BroadLink devices found is 1 2021-04-03 14:20:19.158 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Header to be sent follows (ex checksum): 5A A5 AA 55 5A A5 AA 55 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Z..UZ..U........ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 9B 64 65 00 00 00 8D DE 18 B0 43 A0 .....de.......C. 00 00 00 00 FB C8 00 00 ........ 2021-04-03 14:20:19.158 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Payload to be sent follows (unencrypted): 00 00 00 00 A7 C5 DF 0A 91 33 F1 88 C9 82 A5 6D .........3.....m C8 BC F9 DF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 2021-04-03 14:20:19.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Sending: Authorisation: txMsg length = 136 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: RX of Authorisation msg response from 10.1.11.20 failed: timeout 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: This device is probably offline - mac address: a0:43:b0:18:de:8d 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: k = rf433 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: k = rf433 has no associated code at this time 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: k = ir 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: a0:43:b0:18:de:8d_ir 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: a0:43:b0:18:de:8d 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: RM4 Pro - IR 1 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: urn:schemas-micasaverde-com:device:IrTransmitter:1 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: D_BroadLink_Mk2_IrRf_1.xml 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: type = function, value = function: 0x19a62d0 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: k = rf315 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: k = rf315 has no associated code at this time 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: {"a0:43:b0:18:de:8d":{"blInternalId":"00000001","blKey":"a7c5df0a9133f188c982a56dc8bcf9df","blDeviceType":25755,"blIp":"10.1.11.20","blDesc":"RM4 Pro"}} --> BroadLinkDevices 2021-04-03 14:20:20.177 luup.chdev.append:: [a0:43:b0:18:de:8d_ir] RM4 Pro - IR 1 2021-04-03 14:20:20.178 luup.chdev.sync:: [82] BroadLink-Mk2, syncing children 2021-04-03 14:20:20.178 luup.set_failure:: status = false 2021-04-03 14:20:20.178 luup.variable_set:: 82.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1.CommFailure was: false now: false #hooks:0 2021-04-03 14:20:20.178 luup.variable_set:: 82.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1.CommFailureTime was: 1617440329 now: 1617474020 #hooks:0 2021-04-03 14:20:20.178 openLuup.scheduler:: [82] BroadLink-Mk2 device startup completed: status=true, msg=All OK, name=BroadLink_Mk2 -
BroadLink Mark II pluginI tested the latest changes to add support for the RM4 Pro and it created a "IR" Child although it did not list any of the devices that have been created inside the RM4 Pro itself (Probably because is an RF device and that child was not created?). Also the IP set in the plugin attributes is different than the IP This is what the logs are showing:
2021-04-02 08:53:44.604 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: The BroadLink device at IP address 10.1.11.126 and of type 0x4e2a is not known to this pluginI do have another Broadlink device in the network so I guess is trying to discover that one as well.
2021-04-02 08:53:44.557 openLuup.scheduler:: [3] Alternate App Store device startup completed: status=true, msg=OK, name=AltAppStore 2021-04-02 08:53:44.557 openLuup.scheduler:: [82] BroadLink-Mk2 device startup 2021-04-02 08:53:44.557 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Initialising plugin: BroadLink_Mk2 2021-04-02 08:53:44.557 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Using: Lua 5.1 2021-04-02 08:53:44.557 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: 0.57 --> PluginVersion 2021-04-02 08:53:44.558 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Using: dkjson 2021-04-02 08:53:44.559 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Broadcasting discovery message 2021-04-02 08:53:44.559 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: 10.1.11.22 2021-04-02 08:53:44.603 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: 10.1.11.126 2021-04-02 08:53:44.604 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Rx'ed a discovery response: rxMsg length = 128 5A A5 AA 55 5A A5 AA 55 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Z..UZ..U........ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ E5 D6 00 00 2A 4E 07 00 00 00 DD 8A EB A7 DF 24 ....*N.........$ 00 00 00 00 2A 4E 0A 01 0B 7E DD 8A EB A7 DF 24 ....*N...~.....$ E5 A5 A5 E5 85 8B E6 96 AF E7 A9 BA E8 B0 83 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 01 ................ 2021-04-02 08:53:44.604 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Looks like the Cloud bit is set - that's not good 2021-04-02 08:53:44.604 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Friendly name: e5a5a5e5858be696afe7a9bae8b083 2021-04-02 08:53:44.604 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: The BroadLink device at IP address 10.1.11.126 and of type 0x4e2a is not known to this plugin 2021-04-02 08:53:45.604 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Number of BroadLink devices found is 1 2021-04-02 08:53:45.604 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Header to be sent follows (ex checksum): 5A A5 AA 55 5A A5 AA 55 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Z..UZ..U........ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 9B 64 65 00 00 00 8D DE 18 B0 43 A0 .....de.......C. 00 00 00 00 FB C8 00 00 ........ 2021-04-02 08:53:45.605 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Payload to be sent follows (unencrypted): 00 00 00 00 A7 C5 DF 0A 91 33 F1 88 C9 82 A5 6D .........3.....m C8 BC F9 DF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 2021-04-02 08:53:45.618 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Sending: Authorisation: txMsg length = 136 2021-04-02 08:53:45.632 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Broadlink device: 649b replied with: 03e9 2021-04-02 08:53:45.632 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: Error: errorMsg = fff9 2021-04-02 08:53:45.632 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: This device is probably offline - mac address: a0:43:b0:18:de:8d 2021-04-02 08:53:45.632 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: k = ir 2021-04-02 08:53:45.632 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: a0:43:b0:18:de:8d_ir 2021-04-02 08:53:45.632 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: a0:43:b0:18:de:8d 2021-04-02 08:53:45.632 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: RM4 Pro - IR 1 2021-04-02 08:53:45.632 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: urn:schemas-micasaverde-com:device:IrTransmitter:1 2021-04-02 08:53:45.632 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: D_BroadLink_Mk2_IrRf_1.xml 2021-04-02 08:53:45.633 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: type = function, value = function: 0x1a03140 2021-04-02 08:53:45.633 luup_log:82: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: {"a0:43:b0:18:de:8d":{"blInternalId":"00000001","blKey":"a7c5df0a9133f188c982a56dc8bcf9df","blDeviceType":25755,"blIp":"10.1.11.20","blDesc":"RM4 Pro"}} --> BroadLinkDevices 2021-04-02 08:53:45.633 luup.chdev.append:: [a0:43:b0:18:de:8d_ir] RM4 Pro - IR 1 2021-04-02 08:53:45.633 luup.chdev.sync:: [82] BroadLink-Mk2, syncing children 2021-04-02 08:53:45.633 luup.set_failure:: status = false 2021-04-02 08:53:45.633 luup.variable_set:: 82.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1.CommFailure was: false now: false #hooks:0 2021-04-02 08:53:45.633 luup.variable_set:: 82.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1.CommFailureTime was: 1617316371 now: 1617368025 #hooks:0 2021-04-02 08:53:45.633 openLuup.scheduler:: [82] BroadLink-Mk2 device startup completed: status=true, msg=All OK, name=BroadLink_Mk2Any ideas how to get the RF portion working?
-
Generic support for vacuums@therealdb could use homebridge 2 openluup also...
-
Homebridge to Openluup -
Homebridge to Openluup -
Homebridge to Openluup@crille currently the plugin relies on an initial manual configuration and the current mechanism creates the children in a very dumb way. It is possible to build a more sophisticated interface although the plugin still in a "proof of concept state".
Yes, the devices are named DeviceType_UUID by default when they are created for the first time but after that I can rename them any way I want and the names remain persistent after engine reloads.
My understanding is that once a device is renamed on your setup it will get renamed back to the default deviceType_uuid after the engine reloads right? and that's what I can't replicate on my end.
-
Homebridge to Openluup@crille said in Homebridge to Openluup:
luup.chdev.append
I'm really puzzled by this... Your logs looks just fine... The devices should not get renamed back when luup.chdev.append runs . if the devices where getting re-created the engine should be getting reloaded right away... What openluup version are you running?
Wondering if @akbooer sees something weird in how the plugin is syncing the devices after the append runs that could be causing it... at line 601 of L_Homebridge2openllup1.lua as it is something I'm not experiencing on my end... and I'm not sure where else to look...
-
Homebridge to Openluup@crille I've been renaming renaming devices on my end without experiencing what you are describing. Are both Mitsubishi thermostat? Do you mind sharing an entire log output after an engine reload, additional 5 second log for the first device've value refresh and log output while rename a homebridge device from within openluup?
-
Homebridge to Openluup@crille said in Homebridge to Openluup:
THERMOSTAT_uuid
That's odd... It shouldn't do that...
is your deviceList Variable ending with a semicolon ";" after your uuid ?