Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
S

sidmsmith

@sidmsmith
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
A
Love openLuup - it just keeps working perfectly. I started looking at trying to add a gen4 Shelly device to the Shelly plugin via L_ShellyBridge.lua. The plugin is a little uncooked (no rudeness intended), so a bit of a rabbit hole for me. All of a sudden no console pages available in either Firefox or Chrome. AltUI works perfectly and all the log files indicate no errors. openLuup still running everything works as it should - just no console pages. I possibly screwed something up but any recently changes files show no problems. The original/ backup of L_ShellyBridge.lua was reinstated but still no console. Bit stumped on this one. Not sure how to debug. Any ideas?
Plugins
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Ezlo Paid Subscription for Vera Cloud Services
toggledbitsT
It appears that Ezlo is going to new levels of paid subscription for cloud services supporting Vera hubs. I have to congratulate them. It will soon be 8 years since Ezlo acquired Vera, and despite their purported financial and "intellectual" capital, they have to date not produced a viable full replacement for Vera. Now they are going to charge extra for services for a platform that they stopped updating years ago. If you know anyone who hasn't yet fully moved on from Captain Ahab's White Whale Chase, please remind them that my Decouple project is still up on Github to decouple a Vera Plus/Secure/Edge from Vera/Ezlo's cloud services. Veras have been said to misbehave when they can't reach the mother ship. I have also written my first new Vera plugin in... six years? more?... the AlertPushover project will send Vera hub alerts to Pushover, so you can still get messages generated by your Vera hub without paying for Ezlo's cloud service. It's crude but functional (i.e. better than nothing/worth every penny paid). These two projects won't replace the functionality of their cloud service and app for those who need those things. But any that don't, this may help bridge the gap. Hopefully these stragglers who have waited so long and been disappointed so often will get the idea that it's time to move on.
General Discussion
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Answered] OK to remove old json files?
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
About
Posts
6
Topics
3
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Expression Evaluation - Last Seen Date/Time
    S sidmsmith

    I think I solved this with a completely different approach. Instead of using variables based on Last Seen, I am just checking the current state of the sensor and used the Restriction that the sensor must be FALSE (ie door closed) for 120 seconds. Not sure why I did not try this the first time.

    Screenshot 2024-09-03 181724.png

    Since my Reaction is now working, I should probably close this out as Solved. However, I am still interested in how to use a variable as described in the original post in case I need to use a similar approach in the future. Hopefully someone can provide some guidance (thanks realdb!) on how to use the variables. If I don't hear back within a few days, I will go ahead and update this as Solved.

    General Discussion

  • Expression Evaluation - Last Seen Date/Time
    S sidmsmith

    @therealdb Thanks for your feedback!

    I have not used a metadata statement like this before so have a follow up. I think I have the proper data elements. But is this statement supposed to be part of the Expression definition or the Reaction Trigger? The screenshot below shows what I tried creating the expression.

    Screenshot 2024-09-03 161415.png

    Sorry for the lack of understanding on my part! Is the goal to have the variable itself be true/false? Or is the goal to have the variable still provide a numeric result that is used in the reaction? I may just need a little more direction.

    Thanks again!

    General Discussion

  • Expression Evaluation - Last Seen Date/Time
    S sidmsmith

    I am trying to run a reaction that turns on lights if a sensor has not been tripped for 2 minutes. Basically, when a garage door is open, turn on inside lights if nothing has been sensed for 2 minutes. My question has to do with the expression/variable for "Last Seen". The variable never gets updated over time since the last seen event never changes.

    Screenshot 2024-09-02 191632.png

    In the screenshot above, the reaction checks for any garage door as well as the variable called "GarageLastEntry". The expression for this variable is displayed below:

    Screenshot 2024-09-02 191651.png

    The problem that I am experiencing is that the variable never changes over time. I understand that this is because the "last seen" variable does not change over time when there is no activity. In this screenshot, the value shows 0.029... This can also be seen as the current value in the original reaction screenshot above. After 10 minutes, this value should be 10. However, when a garage door is opened, the variable does not get updated and thus the rule does not become true since .029 is less than 2.

    When I go to the variable and click on the > icon, the variable then gets updated as expected as seen below:
    Screenshot 2024-09-02 191711.png

    So the ultimate question is, how do I use a rule that can use a variable such as "last seen"? Do I need to create another variable or reaction that multiplies this by 1 every minute? From what I read in the manual, a variable is evaluated every time it is included in a reaction. But this is not what I am seeing.

    I also want to ask another question related to this variable. It seems like Reactor continuously deletes this variable and I have to keep recreating it? I have never experienced this with MSR so wanted to ask if this is a common problem or if my definition is causing this.

    Any info is appreciated!!!

    General Discussion

  • MSR Not Actioning
    S sidmsmith

    I updated to the latest build and this solved all of my issues. Thanks for the suggestions! I will try to stay up to date on the latest stable builds from here on.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • MSR Not Actioning
    S sidmsmith

    I am running MSR on a small windows machine. Earlier this week, the machine restarted and Reactor restarted as well. I am now experiencing an issue in which Reactor doesn't seem to be making any updates or calling any scenes. Reactor is communicating with Vera and all entities seem to be accurate (ie lights on or off) and manually clicking on Actions seems to work just fine. The Status page also seems accurate and displays rules automatically being SET and RESET. But when the Reaction changes from SET to RESET or vice versa, none of the actions are actually invoked.

    For example, I manually ran a SET action at 11:29 and my lights turned on. At 11:30, the Status Dashboard shows the rule updating to RESET, but the lights did not turn off.

    I have included a screenshot of the rule history below as well as the log for these times as well.

    Any ideas on what can be going on? I have tried restarting the Windows machine as well as Reactor multiple times to see if this fixes this behavior but have not had any success. Any information is appreciated.

    78f9f75f-d24c-4ff4-a23a-fda0c98cbcbc-image.png

    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:39.161Z VeraController:null VeraController#vera enqueued task for Entity#vera>scene_3 action script.run: task [Object]{ "SceneNum": "3", "DeviceNum": 0, "id": "action", "serviceId": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HomeAutomationGateway1", "action": "RunScene" }
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:39.587Z VeraController:INFO VeraController#vera 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.763Z Rule:NOTICE Evening Lights Rule (Rule#rule-la4gnzmt) configuration changed; reloading
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.766Z Rule:NOTICE Evening Lights Rule (Rule#rule-la4gnzmt) stopping
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.772Z Rule:NOTICE Evening Lights Rule (Rule#rule-la4gnzmt) stopped
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.773Z Rule:NOTICE Rule#rule-la4gnzmt (Evening Lights Rule) starting
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.777Z Rule:INFO Evening Lights Rule (Rule#rule-la4gnzmt) starting evaluation; because startup
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.779Z Rule:INFO Evening Lights Rule (Rule#rule-la4gnzmt) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET!
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.802Z Rule:INFO Evening Lights Rule (Rule#rule-la4gnzmt) evaluation complete
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.809Z Rule:INFO Evening Lights Rule (Rule#rule-la4gnzmt) started
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.811Z Engine:INFO Enqueueing "Evening Lights Rule<SET>" (rule-la4gnzmt:S)
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.840Z Engine:NOTICE Starting reaction Evening Lights Rule<SET> (rule-la4gnzmt:S)
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:29:45.842Z Engine:INFO Evening Lights Rule<SET> all actions completed.
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:30:00.008Z Rule:INFO Evening Lights Rule (Rule#rule-la4gnzmt) starting evaluation; because timer-trigger Timer#rule-la4gnzmt
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:30:00.024Z Rule:INFO Evening Lights Rule (Rule#rule-la4gnzmt) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET!
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:30:00.055Z Rule:INFO Evening Lights Rule (Rule#rule-la4gnzmt) evaluation complete
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:30:00.062Z Engine:INFO Enqueueing "Evening Lights Rule<RESET>" (rule-la4gnzmt:R)
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:30:00.079Z Engine:NOTICE Starting reaction Evening Lights Rule<RESET> (rule-la4gnzmt:R)
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:30:00.080Z Engine:INFO Evening Lights Rule<RESET> all actions completed.
    [stable-22274]2023-04-14T03:30:01.099Z VeraController:INFO VeraController#vera 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged

    Multi-System Reactor

  • HTTP Request Max Response Limit
    S sidmsmith

    MSR has a parameter called "http_request_action_maxresponse" that can be updated within the properties. There is a good section describing this in the manual. However, the installation config file doesn't include the parameter out of the box. I was able to add the parameter (see below) and eventually got it to work after searching for a while.

    Suggestions:

    1. Include the parameter in the initial config file (or)
    2. Update the manual to state that the parameter should be added to the file

    Additional suggestion:
    I understand that it is potentially unsafe to have a large limit overall. However, some API calls unfortunately return large sizes which aren't necessarily problematic. The additional suggestion is to include a configurable max size within each HTTP Reaction in the UI. If it isn't populated then MSR could default to the config file like it does today. This way, we could have a reasonable default limit while allowing larger limit for certain HTTP calls.

      engine:
        #
        # enabled - Whether or not the rules engine runs. Change only when directed.
        enabled: true
        http_request_action_maxresponse: 10000
    
    Multi-System Reactor
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved