Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
wmarcolinW

wmarcolin

@wmarcolin
Is there a way to turn this section (image in post) off?
toggledbitsT
Topic thumbnail image
Comments & Feedback
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
CrilleC
Just throwing out a general hint to the people running Homebridge and MQTT. Homebridge MQTT-Thing hasn't been updated in almost 2 years and it falls behind on compatibility with the development of Homebridge. I was looking for a replacement and found Homebridge Easy MQTT and I think it's a good replacement for MQTT-Thing. I particularly find Easy MQTT Value tranformers easier to to understand and use compared to MQTT-Thing Apply function. It took a while to migrate everything but I'm pleased and can recommend.
Software
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
Shelly Wall Display XL
therealdbT
I don't know if you guys are into dashboards, but I am. For a second home I tried the Shelly Wall Display 2, and while not so big, it worked well over the summer. Since we're remodeling our house, I just swapped my old Fire Tablet (with its own problems) with two new Shelly Wall Display XL. I just removed the standard firmware, and I added mine (https://github.com/dbochicchio/ShellyElevate), forked from https://github.com/RapierXbox/ShellyElevate I just managed to support buttons (this thing has 4 of them) and it's all auto-discovered by Home Assistant and accessible via Reactor. I also have a new build in the works with support for buttons inside HA. I added a bonus Javascript interface sending events (screen/screensaver status, buttons, motion) to automatically drive the dashboard (all doing in HTML+Javascript and monitoring Reactor's variable). This specifical thing excluded, go get one of them, the device has a decent CPU for HA dashboards and blends wonderfully in the decor.
Hardware
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Do you Matter?
akbooerA
Is anyone using the Matter protocol to connect devices?
General Discussion
About
Posts
295
Topics
33
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
2

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    Hi @toggledbits

    Yes, the idea is to stop the reactor, but almost stop it! What I mean is that the Reactor can stop and start working again via an external switch, for example from HE.

    In other words, MSR would not execute actions, it would listen normally and update the status of devices normally, but it would not execute any Rule Sets or Reactions if this external switch were turned off. If you turn it on, everything goes back to working.

    The idea would be to have a dashboard that can turn this switch on or off. Of course, if it is not configured in reactor.yaml, this functionality would not exist.

    Thanks,
    Wilson

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @toggledbits

    Any sugestion boss?

    Thanks

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    Use case:

    When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled.

    To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work.

    Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch.

    In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR.

    Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR.

    If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR.

    Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Set Reaction > Script Action
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @toggledbits said in Set Reaction > Script Action:

    each id in getEntity("groups>dgc_PushableButton_N0").attributes.sys_group.members:
    performAction( id, "x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh", {} )

    EXCELLENT, IT WORKED!!! Thank you very much.

    I was already working on this script, based on the example at the beginning of this discussion, but I was using performOnEntity.

    each id in getEntity('groups>dgc_PushableButton_N0').attributes.sys_group.members: performOnEntity(id, 'x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh')
    

    Thank you very much for your help. Another lesson learned, and I am already putting more optimizations into practice.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Set Reaction > Script Action
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @toggledbits

    Sorry, I don't understand, it doesn't work the way it's written below.

    c78b3851-56c0-4d7e-873d-9935042d9555-image.png

    What information do I have to assign to grup_actions, or is it something else?

    Thanks
    Wilson

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Set Reaction > Script Action
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @therealdb

    This feature is really fantastic. I'm changing a lot of rules for it.

    Now you could help me with this one. I need to know if the button is stuck, i.e., if it hasn't returned to zero, and force a refresh.

    The selection rule is already correct, but now I can't understand how to define the Group Action to apply x_hubitatRefresh.refresh.

            "dgc_PushableButton_N0":
              name: DGC PushableButton Not 0
              select:
                - include_capability:
                  - x_hubitat_PushableButton
                - exclude_entity:
                  - "hubitatC8>2672"  # Alarm Sirene
                  - "hubitatC8>2100"  # Remote Adriane
                  - "hubitatC8>420"   # Remote Quad
              group_actions: x_hubitat_Refresh
              filter_expression: >
                entity.attributes.x_hubitat_PushableButton.pushed != 0 and
                entity.attributes.x_hubitat_PushableButton.pushed != null
    
    

    Could you help me with your experience?

    This is what I want to change.

    6bc1ff1f-4403-4906-b947-f11916b2ab16-image.png

    Only apply refresh, to the button selected by the DynamicGroup.

    Or in this case is Script that I need to create?

    Thanks.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Set Reaction > Script Action
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @toggledbits

    fe8bb433-b91b-4260-9864-7f3d6074778c-Untitled.jpg

    I don't know what other words to use to describe Reactor! If I had read the entire manual, I wouldn't have posted about Group Action. Now that I've read everything that DynamicGroupController can do, it's impressive.

    I was definitely one of the enthusiasts when this was implemented, and now with this option to take actions, it's wonderful. It's going to simplify a lot of rules for me.

    Thank you very much @t. Every day I'm surprised by the things that can be done in Reactor.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Set Reaction > Script Action
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @Crille

    Thank you for your comment, but I need this to be executed by an action already within the routines I program in Reactor.

    So using it within the configuration would not help me.

    The selection of devices is indeed within the Dynamic Group, which is perfect, but I was wondering if I could do something like a script, which would require a routine like the one I have today, where I send a list of devices to be turned on, even if they are already on, so I don't have to create a group to analyze the status of each one.

    I want to do something smarter.

    Anyway, thank you, and let's see if we have any other recommendations.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Set Reaction > Script Action
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    Hi

    Use case: possibility of using a script instead of setting up an action in this way.

    4bff09e1-539b-46c8-8c37-090b1b966284-image.png

    If I have a variable that contains the device IDs within the array, could I use a script to execute the powe_switch.on command for the devices in this list?

    b4dfc617-412a-42ff-ae7b-ae8f0d65c39e-image.png

    I tried to understand in the manual (https://reactor.toggledbits.com/docs/Script-Action/) how to use this script feature, but I was unsuccessful. Are there any examples here in the forum of how to use it so I can continue my development?

    Thanks.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @toggledbits

    While you're at it, could you add to Santa's list a request for a function that, when given two coordinates, returns the distance between them?

    I'll explain the use case: when Life360 worked on Hubitat, one of the variables was precisely the distance between the device and the point determined as the home. However, as I said, it hasn't worked for a long time.

    This was one of the reasons for installing Home Assistance, which works perfectly, but it doesn't have this information, so I had to do the calculation.

    I know, you're going to say what a horrible thing, what a mess, but it's working.

    I prepared a series of calculations, using the coordinates of my home as a reference, for my phone WIL and my wife's phone ADRI. The phone coordinates come from Life360.

    525b8ca4-86c2-424f-a3c6-6b11aba39730-image.png

    Next, I have the calculations.

    391c3a64-dbf9-4a7d-b01c-2a583a6bc83f-image.png

    So, I have the result.

    36c24be1-f4ec-426e-af61-485de33457de-image.png

    I used this formula Python.

    from math import radians, sin, cos, sqrt, atan2
    
    def haversine(lat1, lon1, lat2, lon2):
        R = 6371  # raio da Terra em km
    
        dlat = radians(lat2 - lat1)
        dlon = radians(lon2 - lon1)
    
        lat1 = radians(lat1)
        lat2 = radians(lat2)
    
        a = sin(dlat/2)**2 + cos(lat1) * cos(lat2) * sin(dlon/2)**2
        c = 2 * atan2(sqrt(a), sqrt(1 - a))
    
        return R * c  # distância em km
    
    

    Thanks.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    Hi @toggledbits

    As I mentioned, I don't think it's a performance issue. Looking at the memory and processing of the Reactor and HA VM, the consumption is insignificant. I have more than 370 devices between ZWave and ZigBee, the Reactor is connected to a Hubitat C8, Hubitat C7, Zemismart M1, Aqara, and now HA, and it doesn't even affect processing.

    My only desire was to remove elements from the Reactor in Entity that I don't care about. However, this is more a matter of usage habit than performance.

    And by the way, the implementation in the latest version of the link to go directly to the rule or devices is fantastic. You still need to tweak the Entity Widgets for the Entity list. I think that instead of calling by Entity Name, it is calling by Canonical ID, and this is not working. But the idea is fantastic.

    How is Santa's wish list coming along? You could have a post with this list just so we know what's coming down the road at some point.

    Thanks!

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    Hi @toggledbits

    I understand, I know that the system is very robust and supports thousands of interactions, I even imagine that because the two VMs of Reactor and HASS are on the same computer, the speed of communication is enormous.

    So, apart from the overload issue that not have, I'm thinking about the practicality of using it, by removing from the list of HASS entity devices that I'm not interested in viewing in Reactor.

    Looking at the manual, excuse my incompetence, I really couldn't identify how to configure not to load the Entity in Reactor, I made several attempts and I can't remove the devices. Below is my last attempt. If you can help me with the correct configuration.

    
      - id: hass
        enabled: true
        implementation: HassController
        name: Home Assistant System
        config:
          source: 'ws://192.xxx.xxx.xxx:8123'
          access_token: "eyJhbxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxc0N>
          #
          # ignore_cert - If true, suppresses certificate validation when using wss:// (Websocket
          #               with SSL/TLS) and thus allows a self-signed certificate to be used on
          #               the Hass system.
          #ignore_cert: false
          #
          # dump_all_states - This is for troubleshooting. Do not enable unless asked.
          #dump_all_states: false
          exclude_entities:
            - "hass>sensor_sun*"
    

    Thanks.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    Hi @toggledbits

    I'm new to HA, and I just finished integrating it with MSR. It was very easy to configure and interact between platforms.

    However, one thing that bothered me is that all HA Entities were sent to MSR, and in my opinion, this generates unnecessary integration overload. I searched the manual and here in the forum for a way to delete everything I don't want to come to MSR, such as all this information from Sun *.

    fbacfe91-6a1f-42c5-a2bf-8179f9bfdef1-image.png

    Is it possible to configure this, as we already do with Vera, for example? And if possible, would using a wildcard such as hass>sun* automatically exclude all other entities of this type?

    Thanks.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Throttled problem
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @toggledbits

    Looking for a solution, I implement this script.

    #!/bin/bash
    
    # Nome do UPS configurado em /etc/nut/ups.conf
    UPS_NAME="TrippLite"
    
    # Comando para verificar o status do UPS
    if upsc "$UPS_NAME@localhost" | grep -q "DATA-STALE"; then
        echo "$(date): DATA-STALE detectado. Reiniciando o serviço NUT." >> /var/log/monitor_nut.log
        systemctl restart nut-driver.service
        systemctl restart nut-server.service
        systemctl restart nut-monitor.service
    else
        echo "$(date): Serviço funcionando normalmente." >> /var/log/monitor_nut.log
    fi
    
    

    We'll see if it eases the problem, but here's the situation with the NUT.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Throttled problem
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @toggledbits

    I removed the crontab stop and restart process with a set time, and then restarted the MSR to follow the new logs, below.

    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T14:28:58.785Z <NUTController:null> Module NUTController v25026
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T14:28:59.438Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.16>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T14:28:59.444Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut connected to "192.168.50.8":3493
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T14:28:59.444Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut setting client username (Reactor) >
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T14:28:59.544Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut client not yet ready; waiting
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T14:28:59.544Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut client ready after authentication
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T14:29:00.631Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initial query succeeded with 1 ite>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T14:29:00.688Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initializing TrippLite
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:04:17.580Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:04:17.580Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:04:27.602Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:04:27.603Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:04:37.610Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:04:37.610Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:04:47.618Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:04:47.619Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:04:57.682Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:04:57.682Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:05:07.687Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:05:07.687Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:05:18.056Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:05:18.056Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:05:28.059Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:05:28.059Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:05:38.068Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T15:05:38.068Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    .
    . start the DAT-STALE
    .
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T16:59:13.198Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T16:59:23.199Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T16:59:23.200Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T16:59:33.202Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T16:59:33.203Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T16:59:43.213Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T16:59:43.214Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T16:59:53.227Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T16:59:53.227Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:03.330Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:03.330Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    .
    . nothing change than I restart the process (
    .
    #systemctl restart nut-driver.service
    #systemctl restart nut-server.service
    #systemctl restart nut-monitor.service
    .
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:13.332Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:13.332Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:23.336Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:23.336Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:33.362Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:33.363Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:43.414Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:43.414Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DRIVER-NOT-CONNECTED
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:44.544Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut connection closed; attempting re>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:44.596Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.16>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:44.597Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut connected to "192.168.50.8":3493
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:44.597Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut setting client username (Reactor) >
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:44.598Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut client ready after authentication
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:44.648Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initial query succeeded with 1 ite>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:54.705Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initial query succeeded with 1 ite>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:00:54.748Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initializing TrippLite
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:28:37.934Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:28:37.934Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:28:47.942Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:28:47.942Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:28:57.945Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:28:57.946Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:29:07.959Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut failed to get detail for TrippLite:>
    [latest-25016]2025-01-28T17:29:07.960Z <NUTController:CRIT> !DATA-STALE
    .
    . but after 8min DATA-STALE again
    .
    

    When it failed I consulted upsc directly and the answer I got was the one below.

    root@main:/home/wilson/reactor/logs# upsc TrippLite@192.168.50.8
    Init SSL without certificate database
    Error: Data stale
    root@main:/home/wilson/reactor/logs#
    

    Importantly, in MSR the NUT service does not crash, but it stops updating.

    654abd95-559a-41de-a535-c4ae65f81943-image.png

    See that the device goes into an uninformed/excluded status.

    ee8ca3f8-76e0-4020-8364-5644bc593555-image.png

    I don't think the problem lies with the MSR/NUTConttoler, it's a matter of the NUT itself managing the UPS. I've been in this situation for more than a year and I can't get out of the problem loop, so some time ago I adopted the stop and restart crontab to alleviate the problem.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Throttled problem
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    Hi @toggledbits !!

    I installed the new version, and at the same time created a log file specifically for NUTController, below is what I captured in the first 20 minutes, remembering that every 10 minutes I stop and restart the service to mitigate the problem.

    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:42:31.243Z <NUTController:null> Module NUTController v25026
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:42:31.840Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:42:31.848Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut connected to "192.168.50.8":3493
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:42:31.848Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut setting client username (Reactor) and password
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:42:31.887Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut client ready after authentication
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:42:31.960Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initial query succeeded with 1 items returned
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:42:32.007Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initializing TrippLite
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:01.750Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut connection closed; attempting reconnect...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:01.808Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:01.810Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:01.811Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (1 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:03.811Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:03.812Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:03.812Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (2 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:05.897Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:05.898Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:05.911Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (3 fails)
    .
    . repeat same fail 4....28
    .
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:58.732Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:58.733Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:50:58.734Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (29 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:51:00.740Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:51:00.741Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:51:00.742Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (30 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:51:02.762Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:51:02.764Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut connected to "192.168.50.8":3493
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:51:02.764Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut setting client username (Reactor) and password
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:51:02.764Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut client ready after authentication
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:51:02.826Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initial query succeeded with 1 items returned
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T18:51:02.875Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initializing TrippLite
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:01.389Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut connection closed; attempting reconnect...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:01.440Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:01.440Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:01.441Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (1 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:03.441Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:03.444Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:03.445Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (2 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:05.454Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:05.455Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:05.462Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (3 fails)
    .
    . repeat same fail 4....28
    .
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:58.245Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:58.246Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:00:58.246Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (29 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:01:00.246Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:01:00.248Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:01:00.248Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (30 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:01:02.250Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:01:02.250Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut connected to "192.168.50.8":3493
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:01:02.250Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut setting client username (Reactor) and password
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:01:02.251Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut client ready after authentication
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:01:02.310Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initial query succeeded with 1 items returned
    [latest-25016]2025-01-27T19:01:02.367Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut initializing TrippLite
    
    
    Multi-System Reactor

  • Throttled problem
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @toggledbits download and test now.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Throttled problem
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @toggledbits hi!

    This NUT UPS issue is something I've been unable to get to work perfectly for months, not to mention year. I even posted a message to you recently.

    I tried to use an old solution from the HE community instead of the MSR solution. The information it returns is much simpler, I had to add attributes to the drive, but the problem turns out to be the same, the NUT stops working, the communication between the UPS and the VM where the NUT is located is not stable. HE upsd drive result: Satale date.

    dev:1572025-01-24 08:21:16.586 PMinfo
    connected to upsd on 192.168.50.8:3493 - monitoring TrippLite every 30 seconds
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:21:01.183 PMinfo
    connected to upsd on 192.168.50.8:3493 - monitoring TrippLite every 30 seconds
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:20:31.149 PMerror
    telnet connect error: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused (Connection refused)
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:20:01.110 PMinfo
    disconnected from upsd
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:20:00.082 PMerror
    telnet status: send error: Broken pipe (Write failed)
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:11:15.553 PMinfo
    connected to upsd on 192.168.50.8:3493 - monitoring TrippLite every 30 seconds
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:45.514 PMerror
    telnet connect error: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused (Connection refused)
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:30.421 PMerror
    telnet connect error: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused (Connection refused)
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:00.277 PMinfo
    disconnected from upsd
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:00.252 PMerror
    telnet status: receive error: Stream is closed
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:00.228 PMwarn
    upsd: Stale data
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:00.216 PMwarn
    upsd: Stale data
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:00.203 PMwarn
    upsd: Stale data
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:00.122 PMwarn
    upsd: Stale data
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:00.111 PMwarn
    upsd: Stale data
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:00.098 PMwarn
    upsd: Stale data
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:10:00.069 PMwarn
    upsd: Stale data
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:09:30.112 PMwarn
    upsd: Stale data
    dev:1572025-01-24 08:09:30.101 PMwarn
    upsd: Stale data
    

    In other words, after switching from MSR to HE control, the problem continues, changing the error Throttled to ECONNREFUSED.

    Making a new test, returning to the MSR's NUTControl configuration below, with the same parameters as the HE drive.

      - id: nut
        enabled: true
        implementation: NUTController
        name: NUT UPS Controller
        config:
          server: 192.168.50.8  # modify the IP address as needed
          port: 3493            # optional, default shown
          username: "Reactor"   # optional, no user auth if not set
          password: "Mac1967"   # optional, must be specified if username is used
    
    

    The error.log log on MSR is:

    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:03.776Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:05.800Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:07.807Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:07.815Z <Controller:ERR> Controller NUTController#nut is off-line!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:09.907Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:11.924Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:13.927Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:15.939Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:18.124Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:20.128Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:22.150Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:24.172Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:26.182Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    
    

    IMPORTANT, even with this error log, the NUT control in the MSR does not stop working, it persists until it manages to communicate and collect the data, but this error scenario overloads the MSR.

    Perhaps the time solution indicated by @tunnus could help.

    In addition, parts of the ro reactor.log:

    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:46.777Z <Structure:INFO> Structure#1 loading controller interface nut (NUTController)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:46.779Z <NUTController:null> Module NUTController v24303
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:46.779Z <Controller:INFO> Loaded NUTController version "0.1.24303"; Patrick Rigney/Kedron Holdings LLC <patrick@toggledbits.com> https://reactor.toggledbits.com/docs/NUTC>
    [
    .
    .
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:46.847Z <Structure:INFO> Starting controller NUTController#nut
    .
    .
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:47.394Z <Engine:INFO> [Engine]Engine#1 master timer tick, local time "1/24/2025 9:06:47 PM" (TZ offset -300 mins from UTC)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:47.395Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:47.397Z <HubitatController:NOTICE> HubitatController#hubitatC7 performing initial connection and inventory
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:47.398Z <HubitatController:NOTICE> HubitatController#hubitatC8 performing initial connection and inventory
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:47.405Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut connected
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:47.455Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut setting client username (Reactor) and password
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:47.460Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:192.168.50.9
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:47.511Z <Controller:NOTICE> Controller NUTController#nut is now online.
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:47.511Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut client ready
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:06:47.516Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:192.168.50.133
    .
    .
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:03.774Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:03.776Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:03.776Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (1 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:03.777Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut connection closed
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:03.777Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (1 fails)
    .
    .
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:05.799Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:05.800Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:05.801Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (2 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:05.801Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut connection closed
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:05.802Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (2 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:07.803Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut starting NUT client with "192.168.50.8":3493; waiting for ready...
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:07.807Z <NUTController:ERR> NUTController#nut unable to establish communication with "192.168.50.8":3493: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.50.8:3493 [-]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:07.815Z <Controller:ERR> Controller NUTController#nut is off-line!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:07.816Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (3 fails)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:07.829Z <NUTController:NOTICE> NUTController#nut connection closed
    [latest-25016]2025-01-25T02:10:07.830Z <NUTController:INFO> NUTController#nut recycling/reconnecting in 2000ms (3 fails)
    

    IN SUMMARY:

    • the connection parameters IP, login and password are correct, in the log you can see that it connects.
    • NUTControl works until it starts a sequence of failures.
    • In order to re-establish the service, I put a stop and start process in the crontab every 10 minutes, the problem is that it can remain idle all this time and fail.
    • I've tried changing all the synchronization and reading times in the NUT parameters, I've even increased them to 90 seconds for data collection(ie. POLLFREQALERT 30 // HOSTSYNC 30), and it doesn't change the scenario, at a certain point there's saturation and the UPS stops responding.2

    So I think the idea of making the MSR have a different collection time, longer than other devices, can at least reduce the error log, but it doesn't solve the problem.

    Thanks.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Throttled problem
    wmarcolinW wmarcolin

    @tunnus hi!
    I like what I've read, I think it could be a solution, but it's still not very clear how to configure it, since I want to save various attributes of the device.
    I'll try it out and post the result here for you, but it could be a way forward.
    Thank you.

    Multi-System Reactor
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved