Use case:
When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled.
To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work.
Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch.
In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR.
Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR.
If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR.
Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
@toggledbits, not sure if this is a feature request or I'm using the search tool wrong. You have a "Search for rule" in the Rules Set tab in MSR. It works nicely to find a rule and bring up said rule, but can it/could it be used for as a "where used?" global search? For instance, I have a fairly large set of rules, divided up into 10 different rulesets. There's easily a hundred individual rules, and many of the rules have Rule State triggers, which of course refer to other rules. Amongst my troubleshooting today, I came across what may have been a duplicate or troubleshooting attempt, but I can't tell if it's actually used as a Rule State in another rule without opening each rule that I suspect it may be a part of.
Thanks.
I'm running MSR build 25139 on Docker, using MQTT controller 24293, and everything working as expected. But if I try to upgrade to MQTTController build 25139, I'm getting the following errors on MSR UI:
An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.god
Last 11:20:37
An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.green
Last 11:20:37
An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.red
Last 11:20:37
An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto run" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.pump
Last 11:20:37
An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa watchdog" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.status
Last 11:20:37
My MQTT configuration (local_mqtt_devices.yaml) for the related entity is:
layzspa_message:
type: ValueSensor
capabilities: ["temperature_sensor", "value_sensor", "power_sensor"]
primary_attribute: power_sensor.value
events:
"layzspa/message":
"power_sensor.value":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.PWR )'
expr: "float(payload.PWR)"
"value_sensor.air":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AIR )'
expr: "float(payload.AIR)"
"value_sensor.pump":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.FLT )'
expr: "float(payload.FLT)"
"value_sensor.god":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GOD )'
expr: "float(payload.GOD)"
"value_sensor.lock":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.LCK )'
expr: "float(payload.LCK)"
"value_sensor.unit":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.UNT )'
expr: "float(payload.UNT)"
"value_sensor.error":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.ERR )'
expr: "float(payload.ERR)"
"temperature_sensor.green":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GRN )'
expr: "float(payload.GRN)"
"temperature_sensor.red":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.RED )'
expr: "float(payload.RED)"
"temperature_sensor.target":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TGT )'
expr: "float(payload.TGT)"
"temperature_sensor.value":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TMP )'
expr: "float(payload.TMP)"
"temperature_sensor.virtual":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.VTM )'
expr: "round(float(payload.VTM), 1)"
"temperature_sensor.ambient":
json_payload: true
if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AMB )'
expr: "float(payload.AMB)"
"layzspa/Status":
"value_sensor.status":
if_expr: '! isnull( payload )'
expr: "payload"
"layzspa/button":
"value_sensor.button":
if_expr: '! isnull( payload )'
expr: "payload"
and in reactor.yaml I have:
"layzspa_states":
name: "Lay-Z-Spa States"
friendly_name: 'Lay-Z-Spa States'
include: layzspa_message
I realize my MQTT configuration might be a bit unorthodox, but could there still be something unintentional in the latest MQTTController build? If needed, I can provide detailed logs.
Since today is my birthday - and I still pretend to be unconventional - I'm giving away a present to this wonderful community and I'm releasing my first OpenSprinkler controller for MSR. It was real fun to code it - and while it's still WIP, it seems to work OK for me. It's polling-based at the moment, but I'll add support for updates via MQTT very soon (it's already partially coded).
Get it at (install is similar to MQTTController and such):
https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-opensprinkler
Feel free to try it. It's beta software, but it's stable. I'll update it weekly until all the tasks from my todo list are empty.
Since I've learnt a lot from this controller, I'll explore new controllers soon.
Good day all,
I'm in the process of trying to shut down my 10 year old Linux home server that served many purposes, but primarily it's what I used for my NAS/Plex Media server. I migrated the NAS aspect of the server in November of last year to a true NAS solution (Ubiquti UNAS Pro), which is rack mount and much more efficient than my old tower, which it's only side benefit was heating my home office during the winter. Unfortunately it also means heating my home office during the summer, which were about to be in full swing.
I have two things running on this 10 year old server at this point. MSR and pi-hole. I'm running Plex Media Server on Fedora Workstation in Podman on mini PC, which is much more energy efficient than my old tower. My next step is to migrate MSR. I know there are images of MSR out there, and creating it is well documented. I'm going to be using Podman instead of Docker for various reasons, but they work very similar. What I don't know, is what I need to do to migrate my existing Bare Metal installation over to a container.
Has anyone done this? Any advice?
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions;
Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating;
Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later;
Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase;
Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions;
Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases);
Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Hi guys,
Just wondering how you guys organize your rule sets and rules. I wish I had an extra layer to have some more granularity, but my feature request was not popular.
Maybe there are better ways to organize my rule sets.
I use the rule sets now primarily for rooms. So a rule set per room. But maybe grouping by functionality works better. Any examples/ suggestions would be appreciated.
I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file
x_mqtt_device:
set_speed:
arguments:
speed:
type: str
topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
payload:
type: json
expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }'
While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?
Up and running
Multi-System Reactor
9
Posts
3
Posters
506
Views
3
Watching
-
Ummm, ok this is embarrassing....
I'm actually stuck on creating the simplest rule set / reaction. I can't see anything in the manual that indicates my stupidity, and it's surely not a bug so here goes.
Bare metal install on Debian 10
Simple 'AND' test rule which I can see setting and resetting as the conditions change.I have tried putting a reaction in that rule set to turn on a light. So literally
Entity action > Table Lamp > power_switch.onIf I press the 'Try this action' button from within the reaction, the light goes on.
If I press the 'Run Now' button from the Global reactions list:1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:20:45.257Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Test motion lights<SET> (rule-l3n662g0:S) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:20:45.257Z <Engine:INFO> Test motion lights<SET> all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:20:59.510Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:192.168.70.64 [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:21:13.051Z <wsapi:INFO> client "192.168.70.64#4" closed, code=1001, reason= [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:21:15.726Z <Rule:INFO> Test motion lights (Rule#rule-l3n662g0) RESET! [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:25:03.556Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: [FetchError]FetchError: network timeout at: http://192.168.70.249:3480/data_request?id=status&DataVersion=938493960&Timeout=15&MinimumDe lay=50&output_format=json&_r=1653582285543 [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:26:17.531Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:26:17.536Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Simple Test Reaction (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:26:17.537Z <Engine:INFO> Simple Test Reaction all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:26:45.444Z <VeraController:null> VeraController#vera enqueued task for Entity#vera>device_20200 action power_switch.on: task [Object]{ "newTargetValue": "1", "DeviceNum": 20200, "id": "action", "serviceId": "urn :upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchPower1", "action": "SetTarget" } [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:26:49.094Z <VeraController:null> VeraController#vera enqueued task for Entity#vera>device_20200 action power_switch.on: task [Object]{ "newTargetValue": "1", "DeviceNum": 20200, "id": "action", "serviceId": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchPower1", "action": "SetTarget" } [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:26:59.543Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:26:59.543Z <Engine:NOTICE> Reaction re-l3n7rrij (Simple Test Reaction) is disabled; run aborted. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:27:03.286Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:27:03.287Z <Engine:NOTICE> Reaction re-l3n7rrij (Simple Test Reaction) is disabled; run aborted. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:27:20.861Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:27:20.861Z <Engine:NOTICE> Reaction re-l3n7rrij (Simple Test Reaction) is disabled; run aborted. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:27:23.575Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:27:23.576Z <Engine:NOTICE> Reaction re-l3n7rrij (Simple Test Reaction) is disabled; run aborted. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:27:47.538Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:27:47.542Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Simple Test Reaction (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:27:47.543Z <Engine:INFO> Simple Test Reaction all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:28:14.393Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:28:14.397Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Simple Test Reaction (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:28:14.397Z <Engine:INFO> Simple Test Reaction all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:28:24.225Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:28:24.228Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Simple Test Reaction (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:28:24.229Z <Engine:INFO> Simple Test Reaction all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:28:35.395Z <VeraController:null> VeraController#vera enqueued task for Entity#vera>device_20200 action power_switch.on: task [Object]{ "newTargetValue": "1", "DeviceNum": 20200, "id": "action", "serviceId": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchPower1", "action": "SetTarget" } [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:29:12.974Z <VeraController:null> VeraController#vera enqueued task for Entity#vera>device_20160 action power_switch.on: task [Object]{ "newTargetValue": "1", "DeviceNum": 20160, "id": "action", "serviceId": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchPower1", "action": "SetTarget" } [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:29:25.885Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:29:25.889Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Simple Test Reaction (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:29:25.889Z <Engine:INFO> Simple Test Reaction all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:29:50.139Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:29:50.143Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Simple Test Reaction (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:29:50.143Z <Engine:INFO> Simple Test Reaction all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:33:05.815Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:33:05.825Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Simple Test Reaction (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:33:05.826Z <Engine:INFO> Simple Test Reaction all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:35:15.688Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:35:15.692Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Simple Test Reaction (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:35:15.692Z <Engine:INFO> Simple Test Reaction all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:37:17.185Z <VeraController:null> VeraController#vera enqueued task for Entity#vera>device_20160 action power_switch.on: task [Object]{ "newTargetValue": "1", "DeviceNum": 20160, "id": "action", "serviceId": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchPower1", "action": "SetTarget" } [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:37:44.912Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Simple Test Reaction" (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:37:44.916Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Simple Test Reaction (re-l3n7rrij) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:37:44.917Z <Engine:INFO> Simple Test Reaction all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:38:39.696Z <Rule:INFO> Test motion lights (Rule#rule-l3n662g0) SET! [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:38:39.703Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Test motion lights<SET>" (rule-l3n662g0:S) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:38:39.717Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Test motion lights<SET> (rule-l3n662g0:S) [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:38:39.717Z <Engine:INFO> Test motion lights<SET> all actions completed. [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:39:10.418Z <Rule:INFO> Test motion lights (Rule#rule-l3n662g0) RESET! [1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:41:56.241Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: [FetchError]FetchError: network timeout at: http://192.168.70.249:3480/data_request?id=status&DataVersion=938494294&Timeout=15&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1653583298238But the light never comes on
Similarly although the test Rule set is supposed to trigger 'Simple Test Reaction', the light never turns on.
The reaction is enabled. The rule set is enabled.
Time zone is BST (trying to conform to the log requests in the manual!)
I'm sorry! It's going to be something really dumb but I've spent about an hour so far
C
-
@gwp1 said in Up and running:
Screenshot of the ruleset?
Of course, but given the Reaction doesn't do anything...
It's crazy simple. Obviously the rule won't trigger under these circumstances as the motion sensor is not tripped, but even when it does....no reaction
Cheers
C
-
Well, first, you're on an ancient build. I would start by getting on
latest.After that, the log messages are telling you it can't talk to the Vera. Do you see those?
[1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:25:03.556Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: [FetchError]FetchError: network timeout at: http://192.168.70.249:3480/data_request?id=status&DataVersion=938493960&Timeout=15&MinimumDe lay=50&output_format=json&_r=1653582285543Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.
-
Well, first, you're on an ancient build. I would start by getting on
latest.After that, the log messages are telling you it can't talk to the Vera. Do you see those?
[1.0.2-21350]2022-05-26T16:25:03.556Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: [FetchError]FetchError: network timeout at: http://192.168.70.249:3480/data_request?id=status&DataVersion=938493960&Timeout=15&MinimumDe lay=50&output_format=json&_r=1653582285543@toggledbits Ahh, OK. I didn't check the version. I'll upgrade.
Yes I did see it can't talk to Vera but given that I can run the action directly I figured that was looking at something else it was trying to do.....
Clearly all the entities are in place, and updating in real time, as is the rule set so my takeaway was that it can talk to Vera (at least for these functions.
Cheers
C
-
OK, updated and working.
Told you it would be something stupid, although it was only 2 months old
Thanks, as ever
C
@catmanv2 said in Up and running:
although it was only 2 months old
If you mean the release, the stamp 21350 means December 16, 2021, so that's more than five months ago. Things change fast around here!
Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.
-
@catmanv2 said in Up and running:
although it was only 2 months old
If you mean the release, the stamp 21350 means December 16, 2021, so that's more than five months ago. Things change fast around here!
@toggledbits said in Up and running:
@catmanv2 said in Up and running:
although it was only 2 months old
If you mean the release, the stamp 21350 means December 16, 2021, so that's more than five months ago. Things change fast around here!
Ahh I was looking at the date stamp on the download. Thanks, as ever
C
