I've managed to use MSR UI on iOS devices to some degree*, so that although UI elements (e.g. rule sets) are not visible in portrait mode, you've seen them in landscape. Now with recents builds (24302) this does not work anymore, elements (rule sets, entities) are not anymore visible in landscape mode.
Does anyone have similar experiences? Using iOS 18 and Safari/Chrome browser.
( *Drag & drop of rule conditions have never worked on a mobile)
Hi @toggledbits,
I have lots of logs with this:
<Engine:ERR> Assignment to alarm ignored -- expression-driven global cannot be set by assignmentAny hints to where look at to avoid this? Thanks.
Hi @toggledbits
I'd like to update my controllers with these new features, but I'm struggling to find any guidance in the docs - and in general to understand the context.
Could you please elaborate more? Thanks.
I have the following ACL defined:
groups: admin: users: - admin applications: true api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: trueAnd I have authenticated to MSR as "admin" user. However, I'm getting "access denied" when trying to access http://*******:8111/api/v1/log
So what I'm missing, is my ACL incorrectly defined?
Using build 24302 on Docker.
Thanks to @toggledbits for adding a custom CSS. I've started doing a darker Reactor style.
Here's the file: https://gist.github.com/dbochicchio/825098ac13b7f8cac22012eae37ff7ce
A couple of things are still too bright and I'll eventually catch-up. Just place it under your /config directory, naming the file as customstyles.css. Hard refresh your browser.
Hi!
In Home Assistant I sometimes uses the TTS, either to my Sonos or Google speakers. With reactor in Vera I also use TTS.
But in MSR I can't select the TTS-service. It's simply not there. Am I missing something, or is this the case, so far?
Thanks!
/Fanan
Hi
I have just connected a bunch of EzloPi controllers to MSR to import some ESP based devices etc.
They all seemed to have worked and imported in to MSR apart from I have one missing device. It is a Digital Gas Sensor device.
This is how that device looks in the Ezlo API.
Devices Info:
_id: "10696001" deviceTypeId: "ezlopi" parentDeviceId: "10696000" category: "level_sensor" subcategory: "" gatewayId: "457a5069" batteryPowered: false name: "Gas Sensor Digital" type: "sensor" reachable: true persistent: true serviceNotification: false armed: false roomId: "" security: "no" ready: true status: "idle" parentRoom: true protectConfig: "default"Items Info:
_id: "20696001" deviceId: "10696001" hasGetter: true hasSetter: false name: "smoke_density" show: true valueType: "substance_amount" scale: "parts_per_million" value: 2.7472610473632812 valueFormatted: "2.75" status: "idle"There is also an Analog Gas sensor that one did import in to MSR OK.
68d63dab-b871-4f44-912b-cf6e0b9eb4c6-image.png
Devices Info:
_id: "10696000" deviceTypeId: "ezlopi" parentDeviceId: "10696000" category: "security_sensor" subcategory: "gas" gatewayId: "457a5069" batteryPowered: false name: "Gas Sensor Analog" type: "sensor" reachable: true persistent: true serviceNotification: false armed: false roomId: "" security: "no" ready: true status: "idle" parentRoom: true protectConfig: "default"Items Info:
_id: "20696000" deviceId: "10696000" hasGetter: true hasSetter: false name: "gas_alarm" show: true valueType: "token" enum: 0: "no_gas" 1: "combustible_gas_detected" 2: "toxic_gas_detected" 3: "unknown" valueFormatted: "no_gas" value: "no_gas" status: "idle"And this is how this MQ2 Gas Sensor looks like on their dashboard:
Digital
cb77dfa3-4af5-4d06-9635-89207a716a89-image.png
Analog
4fb4da1b-e946-4b89-876c-bcd9f5699b6c-image.png
They have an EzloPi website here you can create your own sensor projects using ESP boards, which is very interesting stuff!
And I just wrote on the Ezlo forum here, how to connect an EzloPi controller to MSR.
THANKS.
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.A couple of things for you @toggledbits, since you mentioned that this release has new features and some tweaks are expected.
Local expressions cannot be deleted. Pushing the X button has no effect for me.
When cloning an entity action, the result is strange (first is cloned one, second is the original action):
a92ea094-9e2c-4aaa-bf47-2d07a6ffdbd0-image.png
When changing the action on the cloned element, the params are added to the original one. See screenshot:
92ac3011-83c8-466b-bd23-47d483ad7a52-image.png
Dark theme has a couple of strange contrasts. One is visible in the previous screenshots (white text on yellow background). Another one is in groups (blue text on blue background):
9b3c4988-53ef-44e6-9672-30e744cacb75-image.png
Overall, I found blue, yellow, red and green (in buttons and forms) to be too bright.
On the bright side:
I love the new script action: thank you! The dark theme is a great start to avoid getting blinded at night I promise I'll try very soon the new features around actions. Thanks!@toggledbits
I just upgraded to version MSR 24293, bare metal running on Fedora. Upon restart, I am getting a error banner:
I followed the new directions about npm
npm i --no-save --no-package-lock --omit dev
Any idea what the issue is?
Seems like switching the UI to the newly added dark mode (thank you for this) does nothing. The UI stays in light mode and only a few buttons turn into dark mode (see screenshot)
Things I have tried:
Hard refresh
Different browser
Different computer
Restarting Reactor
Failed troubleshooting attempts:
No errors in Chrome console
No relevant errors in Reactor log (can still PM the full log file)
Reactor version: latest-24293-ea42a81d
Hardware: Odroid N2+
Linux version: Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
3df2806f-9146-485b-9ec1-d056e91cefe5-image.png Dark mode enabled
ff823023-c079-4684-b01f-d6ac6527d31a-image.png Light mode enabled
Good morning,
I have a service MQTT service that needs a restart occasionally. The add-on (Smartbed MQTT) is for the smart bed base for my bed. It has a "safety light" that I can control from HAAS & MSR as a light entity, and also moves the head of the bed to a preset at bedtime, and then lies it back flat in the morning The problem is, from time to time, the light becomes "unavailable" Restarting from the Add-ons tab in HAAS always fixes it, but I should be able to detect when it happens when "light.tempur_pedic_safety_lights" is not true or false, i.e., unavailable.
What I don't know how to do is how to restart that service. Does anybody have experience in restarting add-ons from MSR?
Running:
Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-24212-3ce15e25 ZWaveJSController [0.1.24232]HAAS:
RPi5-64 (8GB) Core 2024.7.3 Supervisor 2024.08.0 Operating System 13.0 Frontend 20240710.0Hi!
Is it possible to generate two additional log files, the first being the replica of what is displayed on screen by the Rule History widgets and the other with Recently Changed Entities?
And could I configure the generation of one file per day, and delete the older ones? For example, store the last 5 days?
And being more ambitious, does Windget have an icon to open these TXT files in the navigated?
Well, we're approaching Christmas, so here's my request to Santa Claus @toggledbits 🙂
Hi @toggledbits
I'm working on a controller to generate llm response from a prompt in reactor. I have http response coming thru an http request action at the moment, capturing the response inside a local variable. So, it's practically sync.
I want to create a controller, so I don't have to rely on a proxy (and have a simpler architecture), and duplicate absurd http actions, but AFAIK in the current implementation, actions are async only. But if I have multiple requests going on, I cannot be sure what it's really inside an attribute. I also thought that something like a correlation id when sending the request could be used to identity multiple responses, but I wanted to double check with you before starting with something too complicated. I also noticed that some actions in home assistant (ie forecast) are sync and I'm wondering if you have any plan or hint to address this situation. Thanks.
Thanks.
@togglebits I am curious as to why the tilt_sensor.state (primary) = NULL. I believe it should show true or false. I have to use binary_sensor.state instead in my rules.
Again, not sure if this is related to Reactor/ZwaveJSController implementation or the actual Z-Wave JS UI docker version. I have copied, below, the attributes of the tilt sensor in hopes it can help.
Thanks in advance.
Reactor version 23302
ZWaveJSController version 23254
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.3.0.724519f
zwave-js version 12.2.3
@toggledbits I have noticed after upgrading both Reactor and ZWaveJSController to version 24257 that two of my devices/entities, TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO and Zooz ZSE18, had their entity re-named in an unusual way and also appears to be duplicated.
Reactor version 24257
ZWaveJSController version 24257
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.18.1
zwave-js version 13.2.0
Vestibule Motion Sensor State attributes/partial screenshot of entities it created. All entities have the same attributes.
motion_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Home_Security_Motion_sensor_status=8 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=23 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Home Security","Home Security","Motion sensor status","Motion sensor status"] zwave_device.version_info=nullTilt Sensor Door State and Tilt Sensor Door State Simple attributes/partial screenshot of entities it created. All entities have similar attributes with exception of x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_State = 22 or 23.
tilt_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=22 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state","Door state"] zwave_device.version_info=null tilt_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=22 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state (simple)","Door state (simple)"] zwave_device.version_info=null tilt_sensor.state=false x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=23 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state","Door state"] zwave_device.version_info=null tilt_sensor.state=false x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=23 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state (simple)","Door state (simple)"] zwave_device.version_info=nullI'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only).
Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package:
Contrib MQTT templates for Reactor. Contribute to dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib development by creating an account on GitHub.
Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go.
I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them.
The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression.
Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests 🙂
[Solved] Group in Reset Reaction is being ignored
-
They say plagiarism is the best form of flattery, right? Or something like that. Thanks go to @gwp1 for the great title of this subject.I'm trying to get into using the new (to me) group option within the Set and Reset Reactions. I have the Set action working beautifully, however my reset reaction is not. What I am after, which maybe this isn't even possible, is one rule for the motion sensed in my garage. Upon motion, and it night time, turn on the lights. And upon no motion, and no motion for 10 minutes, turn off the lights.MSR Docker on unRAID: latest-22293
Hubitat 2.3.3.137
HaaS 2022.10.4Trigger:
If motion is detected by either sensorSet Reaction:
Only turn the lights on between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise.Reset Reaction: (I've tried a few variations, each with conditional options set.)
Tried: Both Motion sensors, in an AND group or individually as an AND, are False and sustained false for 10 minutes.
Tried: Rule State (this rule itself) is False and sustained false for 10 minutes.Basically the additional condition I am putting into the Reset Reaction group is being ignored and as soon as either motion sensors is false from it's normal reset time, the lights turn off. I would like to have a 10 minute delay before the lights go off. In case I'm moving around and re-trigger a sensor. Are additional conditions allowed within the Reset Group option? Or am I way off and should just break this into two rules? One for on and one for off?
EDIT: Forgot to include my reasoning for not putting the Delay reset for 600 within the Trigger. I want the garage lights to come on again, if they are off, after the motion sensors native timeout has reset. For example, if I go in the garage, the lights automatically turn on. When I leave the garage, I will turn them off. But if I return within 2 minutes, and less than 10 minutes, turn the lights back on again for me.
-
Yeah, that's not how you do that. The Reset reaction runs as soon as your triggers go false. What you really need to do is keep your triggers from going false too early. Your motion sensors have a reset period that is shorter than your ten minute wish (that is, they signal no motion on their own timing, which appears to be shorter than 10 minutes, not at all unusual), so you need to stretch out that time.
Since you already have your triggers in an OR group, this will be easy. Just open the condition options for your OR group, and in the "Follow" section for "delay reset", add a 600 second delay. This is a resettable delay that will restart every time motion is detected, so if motion is detected during the 10 minute delay, the delay will restart anew, keeping the lights on until there is truly no motion detected for 10 minutes.
Your Reset reaction can then just turn the lights off; it needs nothing else (no groups or constraints — remove those).
Edit: to be specific about the reason your Reset reaction doesn't work as you've shown it, as I said, when both motion sensors no longer signal motion, that OR trigger group goes false, and the Reset reaction runs. Since you have a group with constraints, the first thing that happens is that Reactor checks to see if the constraints have been met, and in Reactor's view, your constraint is "Garage - on" (rule) has been false for 10 minutes; there's no way it can be at that moment, and Reactor isn't going to stop there and wait for that to be true; that's not how constraints work. The constraint test is instantaneous, and Reactor only runs the group actions if the constraint conditions are true in that instant. Reactor sees they are not, so skips the power off actions and the Reset reaction is then done working. Reactor will not run it again when the constraint is satisfied, because again, that's not how constraints work.
Edit 2: Also, please don't reuse/plagiarize another existing thread's title. That's really confusing for people searching later, or even reading now. A better and more specific title (for both of those posts) would be appreciated. Post titles should be more descriptive of the problem. Refer to the posting guidelines for examples.
-
Thank you for the very detailed explanation. I haven't really dove into constraints before and clearly I need to so I understand them better.
@toggledbits said in Group in Reset Reaction is being ignored:
open the condition options for your OR group, and in the "Follow" section for "delay reset", add a 600 second delay. This is a resettable delay that will restart every time motion is detected, so if motion is detected during the 10 minute delay, the delay will restart anew
This is exactly how I have all my Motion rules defined. And they work as expected. But in this particular rule, I want the Set reaction to trigger again if it detected motion by either sensor after their timeout and before the 10 minute reset delay within MSR.
Use case: I enter the garage, the lights turn on. I leave the garage and manually turn the lights off. (Assuming there is a 10 minute delay reset defined) I return to the garage 2 minutes later, the sensors detect movement, I would like the lights to turn back on.
With the 10 minute reset delay defined, MSR will see the rule still as true at that 2 minute mark and not fire the Set reaction again, correct?
@toggledbits said in Group in Reset Reaction is being ignored:
please don't reuse/plagiarize another existing thread's title
I will fix this.
EDIT: If the solution for this is to have two rules, I am perfectly fine with that. I just happened to see that Groups were an option within the reactions now and was determining if there is a way to consolidate rules. But if I need an ON and and OFF rule, I'm good with that.
-
OK. Then I think two rules will probably be the easiest way.
Your "On" rule is simple then... either sensor senses motion (OR group with two conditions as before), turn on the light in the Set reaction. No constraints, delays, etc., and no reset reaction, in this rule.
Your "Off" rule is an AND group with two conditions: the light is on (Entity Attribute condition) AND the "On" rule has been false for 10 minutes (sustained for delay on a Rule State condition looking at the "On" rule with the is FALSE operator). Set reaction turns the light off.
Any time motion is sensed, the "On" rule will turn on the light (harmless if it's already on). If the light is on and the "On" rule hasn't seen anything for 10 minutes, the "Off" rule triggers and turns off the light. If you turn off the light manually, and then go back in the room a moment later, the "On" rule will turn the light back on.
-
@toggledbits I like your off rule. It is a different approach than what I have. The end result of both is the same though.
My off rule has the sensors in an AND group (when the sensor is true) with a delay reset of 10 minutes. There is no Set reaction. Only a reset reaction to turn the light off.
-
Not sure you want an AND group with that construction... it requires both sensors to detect motion for the group to be true at the same time. That may be right a lot of the time, but I'll bet it's not some of the time...
-
@toggledbits You are correct. I had an extra motion sensor and was planning on putting it on the opposite side. While I was testing, with three sensors in the AND group, it dawned on me that all three would have to have triggered and gone false for this to work. This won't happen if you only enter the garage a few feet and never to the other side. I ended up creating my rules exactly how your example was and it's working great. Thanks for the insight and example.
-