Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor

Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
30 Posts 4 Posters 5.2k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

    @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

    Okay, so like this?

    Almost. filter_expression should be indented at the same level as select (so two spaces back from what you've shown).

    Also, you have entity.attributes.binary_sensor = true in your filter expression. A couple of errors there. binary_sensor is a capability, so you need to specify the attribute in that capability you want to look at, which is state. That is, you want entity.attributes.binary_sensor.state. Then, you are using the assignment operation = rather than the equality comparison operator ==. And finally, you don't need to make an equality comparison to true or false, because state is already boolean true or false, so you're basically saying if true == true which is true already, or if false == true which is false already... you don't need the == operator or its operand here.

    The same caution above applies to your rule. Get out of the habit of using == with the word true in conditions when testing a boolean attribute, and instead use the is TRUE or is FALSE operators provided. The way you've done it, that operand is a string in the rule condition, so you're forcing an extra conversion and assumption of data type when you use == and true... the is TRUE and is FALSE operators (which take no operand) are more efficient. You even used them in your second condition, so just follow that model.

    T Offline
    T Offline
    tamorgen
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

    The same caution above applies to your rule. Get out of the habit of using == with the word true in conditions when testing a boolean attribute, and instead use the is TRUE or is FALSE operators provided. That operand is a string in the rule condition, so you're forcing an extra conversion and assumption of data type when you use == and true... the is TRUE and is FALSE operators (which take no operand) are more efficient. You even used them in your second condition, so just follow that model.

    Ha, good catch! I didn 't even notice I did that. I usually do try to use "is True", I just missed this one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

      Okay, so like this?

      Almost. filter_expression should be indented at the same level as select (so two spaces back from what you've shown).

      Also, you have entity.attributes.binary_sensor = true in your filter expression. A couple of errors there. binary_sensor is a capability, so you need to specify the attribute in that capability you want to look at, which is state. That is, you want entity.attributes.binary_sensor.state. Then, you are using the assignment operation = rather than the equality comparison operator ==. And finally, you don't need to make an equality comparison to true or false, because state is already boolean true or false, so you're basically saying if true == true which is true already, or if false == true which is false already... you don't need the == operator or its operand here.

      The same caution above applies to your rule. Get out of the habit of using == with the word true in conditions when testing a boolean attribute, and instead use the is TRUE or is FALSE operators provided. The way you've done it, that operand is a string in the rule condition, so you're forcing an extra conversion and assumption of data type when you use == and true... the is TRUE and is FALSE operators (which take no operand) are more efficient. You even used them in your second condition, so just follow that model.

      T Offline
      T Offline
      tamorgen
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

      Also, you have entity.attributes.binary_sensor = true in your filter expression. A couple of errors there. binary_sensor is a capability, so you need to specify the attribute in that capability you want to look at, which is state. That is, you want entity.attributes.binary_sensor.state. Then, you are using the assignment operation = rather than the equality comparison operator ==. And finally, you don't need to make an equality comparison to true or false, because state is already boolean true or false, so you're basically saying if true == true which is true already, or if false == true which is false already... you don't need the == operator or its operand here.

      So like this:

                "window_sensors":
                  select:
                    - include_entity:
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_office_windows'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_basement_window'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_family_room_double_window'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_family_room_fireplace_left'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_family_room_fireplace_right'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_garage_window_back_lower'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_garage_window_back_upper'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_garage_window_front_lower'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_garage_window_front_upper'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_guest_room_windows'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_mama_cave_windows'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_master_bathroom_window'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_master_bedroom_windows'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_mia_s_room_windows'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_mud_room_window'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_morning_room_left'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_morning_room_left_middle'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_morning_room_middle'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_morning_room_right_middle'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_morning_room_right'
                  filter_expression: >
                    entity.attributes.binary_sensor.state
      
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        Seems OK

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          Seems OK

          T Offline
          T Offline
          tamorgen
          wrote on last edited by tamorgen
          #15

          @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

          Seems OK

          It's still not tripping in MSR when I open a window.

          This is what is being shown when all the windows are closed. I'm not really paying atention to the comparssion value, jsut the current value it's displaying. That value isn't changing.

          589719a4-62af-420a-aefe-83ceb44a5801-image.png

          I tried it with sys_group.members as well.

          87f1c786-11f3-475c-9e3e-99adf122f89e-image.png

          None of the comparisons seem to make any difference. Current value: array:0) "" remains the same in any state of the windows.

          T 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Go to your Entities list, and find the window_sensors group entity, look at its attributes while you open and close a listed sensor. If it's not changing, then you either have an error in your DGC configuration, or the device(s) aren't responding as expected.

            Remember also your basic troubleshooting steps: any time something doesn't work the way you expect it to, go look in the log files for messages. DGC configures groups at startup, so look at the messages logged for DynamicGroupController during startup.

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              Go to your Entities list, and find the window_sensors group entity, look at its attributes while you open and close a listed sensor. If it's not changing, then you either have an error in your DGC configuration, or the device(s) aren't responding as expected.

              Remember also your basic troubleshooting steps: any time something doesn't work the way you expect it to, go look in the log files for messages. DGC configures groups at startup, so look at the messages logged for DynamicGroupController during startup.

              T Offline
              T Offline
              tamorgen
              wrote on last edited by tamorgen
              #17

              @toggledbits
              I was just going around the hosue and testing different windows.

              Some of the windows seem to work. When I use sys_group.empty (primary), the value when all the windows are closed is True: The windows that are working, the boolean changes to false and the Local Expression value (window_names) changes to that window. I'm going to have to pinpoint which windows aren't working correctly. It could be an issue in the HA configuration.yaml for the DSC/Envisalink entries. That's for me to figure out.

              The only other issue is the message. It's not sending the value of the string. I'm receiving $ Opened!

              message: ${{ window_names }} Opened!
              

              Edit: The one I had been testing with, right next to my office desk, does change in the entities tab.

              Office Windows
              hass>binary_sensor_office_windows
              true
              1:38:38 PM

              Edit 2: I copied and pasted from the Entities tab the Office Windows Canoncial ID into the reactor.yaml config. Even though they looked identical, once I restarted reactor, that window is now responding properly. I suspect I may have hidden characters in the ones that aren't functioning.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T tamorgen

                @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                Seems OK

                It's still not tripping in MSR when I open a window.

                This is what is being shown when all the windows are closed. I'm not really paying atention to the comparssion value, jsut the current value it's displaying. That value isn't changing.

                589719a4-62af-420a-aefe-83ceb44a5801-image.png

                I tried it with sys_group.members as well.

                87f1c786-11f3-475c-9e3e-99adf122f89e-image.png

                None of the comparisons seem to make any difference. Current value: array:0) "" remains the same in any state of the windows.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                tamorgen
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                Seems OK

                It's still not tripping in MSR when I open a window.

                This is what is being shown when all the windows are closed. I'm not really paying atention to the comparssion value, jsut the current value it's displaying. That value isn't changing.

                589719a4-62af-420a-aefe-83ceb44a5801-image.png

                I tried it with sys_group.members as well.

                87f1c786-11f3-475c-9e3e-99adf122f89e-image.png

                None of the comparisons seem to make any difference. Current value: array:0) "" remains the same in any state of the windows.

                I went back to all the windows in the reactor.yaml file and copied the values directly from the Entities tab. They are all now working.

                The only thing not working is the notification. Any ideas what the cause could be?

                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T tamorgen

                  @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                  @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                  Seems OK

                  It's still not tripping in MSR when I open a window.

                  This is what is being shown when all the windows are closed. I'm not really paying atention to the comparssion value, jsut the current value it's displaying. That value isn't changing.

                  589719a4-62af-420a-aefe-83ceb44a5801-image.png

                  I tried it with sys_group.members as well.

                  87f1c786-11f3-475c-9e3e-99adf122f89e-image.png

                  None of the comparisons seem to make any difference. Current value: array:0) "" remains the same in any state of the windows.

                  I went back to all the windows in the reactor.yaml file and copied the values directly from the Entities tab. They are all now working.

                  The only thing not working is the notification. Any ideas what the cause could be?

                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                  The only thing not working is the notification. Any ideas what the cause could be?

                  You have:

                  message: ${{ window_names }} Opened!
                  

                  That stands out because it's not valid YAML. Missing quotes.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                    The only thing not working is the notification. Any ideas what the cause could be?

                    You have:

                    message: ${{ window_names }} Opened!
                    

                    That stands out because it's not valid YAML. Missing quotes.

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    tamorgen
                    wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                    #20

                    @toggledbits, how should the quotes work for a MSR variable in yaml? I copied your example in the second post, but you aren’t calling a HA function. I’ve been playing around with it, but I’m not getting the variable in the system call.

                    I’m looking at this documentation for HA.

                    Home Assistant

                    Script Syntax

                    Script Syntax

                    Documentation for the Home Assistant Script Syntax.

                    They show an example

                    
                    data: 
                        message: "{{ blind_state_message }}"
                    
                    

                    So, in theory,

                        message: "{{ window_names }}" opened.
                    

                    should be valid. The difference here is that window_names is coming from the local expression.

                    However, MSR throws an error, telling me that I have invalid service data.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • CrilleC Offline
                      CrilleC Offline
                      Crille
                      wrote on last edited by Crille
                      #21

                      @tamorgen You need MSR to evaluate the whole data being sent

                      ${{ { “message”: window_names + “ opened!” } }}
                      
                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • CrilleC Crille

                        @tamorgen You need MSR to evaluate the whole data being sent

                        ${{ { “message”: window_names + “ opened!” } }}
                        
                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        tamorgen
                        wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                        #22

                        @Crille said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                        @tamorgen You need MSR to evaluate the whole data being sent

                        ${{ { “message”: window_names + “ opened!” } }}
                        

                        That's not working either. It actually disables the Play button at he end of Entity Action.

                        This is a system call on home assistant (call_service) to send a notification via the HA companion app. The message: text isn't part of the message to be sent, it's yaml code that is part of the data field.

                        For example, I have another reaction that sends a message to my phone when my washing machine has completed a cycle.

                        Screen Shot 2023-02-23 at 5.56.40 PM.png

                        The word message doesn't appear on my phone, just the data after it.

                        Here is my current rule:

                        Screen Shot 2023-02-23 at 5.59.30 PM.png

                        In the Local Expressions, you can see Last value: (string) "Office Windows", so that value should be returned for window_names in the system call.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • PablaP Offline
                          PablaP Offline
                          Pabla
                          wrote on last edited by Pabla
                          #23

                          Try without the spaces so it looks like this message: ${{window_names}} Open. MSR supports both JSON and Yaml, but you just gotta make sure theres no errors. Usually online validators help with this

                          T 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • CrilleC Offline
                            CrilleC Offline
                            Crille
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            Try my example by hitting the general play button for Reaction.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • PablaP Pabla

                              Try without the spaces so it looks like this message: ${{window_names}} Open. MSR supports both JSON and Yaml, but you just gotta make sure theres no errors. Usually online validators help with this

                              T Offline
                              T Offline
                              tamorgen
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              @Pabla said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                              Try without the spaces so it looks like this message: ${{window_names}} Open. MSR supports both JSON and Yaml, but you just gotta make sure theres no errors. Usually online validators help with this

                              Doesn't work. MSR throws this error.

                              Screen Shot 2023-02-23 at 6.10.33 PM.png

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • PablaP Offline
                                PablaP Offline
                                Pabla
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                I don't think you have it written correctly here's an example of how I have it used in one of my own notifications
                                image.png

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • PablaP Pabla

                                  Try without the spaces so it looks like this message: ${{window_names}} Open. MSR supports both JSON and Yaml, but you just gotta make sure theres no errors. Usually online validators help with this

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  tamorgen
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @Pabla said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                                  Try without the spaces so it looks like this message: ${{window_names}} Open. MSR supports both JSON and Yaml, but you just gotta make sure theres no errors. Usually online validators help with this

                                  That triggers the notification, but the value isn't returned.

                                  IMG_B67DDA55F775-1.jpeg

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • PablaP Offline
                                    PablaP Offline
                                    Pabla
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    Don't use the play button next to the action, use the play button right under set reaction

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • PablaP Pabla

                                      Don't use the play button next to the action, use the play button right under set reaction

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      tamorgen
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @Pabla said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                                      Don't use the play button next to the action, use the play button right under set reaction

                                      Well that makes a difference! This has been driving me nuts all afternoon. Thanks for cluing me in!

                                      IMG_F4FBD5E781DD-1.jpeg

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbits
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        It should look like this:

                                        message: "${{window_names}} Open"
                                        

                                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        Recent Topics

                                        • Error: Command timeout
                                          G
                                          gwp1
                                          0
                                          6
                                          106

                                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          5
                                          131
                                          74.6k

                                        • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                                          CrilleC
                                          Crille
                                          0
                                          5
                                          185

                                        • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                                          G
                                          gwp1
                                          0
                                          6
                                          218

                                        • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          1
                                          1
                                          74

                                        • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                                          M
                                          mgvra
                                          1
                                          3
                                          170

                                        • Script action and custom timers
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          0
                                          4
                                          186

                                        • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                                          CatmanV2C
                                          CatmanV2
                                          0
                                          12
                                          494

                                        • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                                          akbooerA
                                          akbooer
                                          1
                                          2
                                          147

                                        • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                                          CrilleC
                                          Crille
                                          0
                                          6
                                          223

                                        • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          0
                                          17
                                          632

                                        • Shelly Wall Display XL
                                          akbooerA
                                          akbooer
                                          2
                                          9
                                          918
                                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • Unsolved