Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Issue with MSR UI becoming unresponsive
S
I'm having an issue with MSR's UI being very unresponsive. It started happening a couple days ago and I didn't make any changes that would have caused this except adding some meross lan devices in HA. When I go into an entity action and use the search functionality, it usually will start filtering and then get to a place after a few letters are entered where it will take 30 seconds or more (sometimes minutes) for the UI to show what I am typing. During this time MSR ui is completely unresponsive. I've tried multiple browsers and multiple computers. HA and MSR are both deployed in docker. I have run HTOP on the host and when the problem happens there are no CPU/Memory spikes at all. From a functionality standpoint MSR is working perfectly. This seems to be an UI issue only. Do i need to ditch Docker and run MSR on a Proxmox VM? I have both stand alone Docker and Proxmox environments. I dont mind doing that I just want to be able to use the UI again... Installation method Home Assistant Container Core 2025.7.3 Frontend 20250702.3 nothing crazy in the logs except some openweather map stuff that doesn't make any sense as it is working fine in MSR Any help would be greatly appreciated Reactor latest-25328-b2ed1365 app 25328 configuration from /var/reactor/config NODE_PATH /opt/reactor:/opt/reactor/node_modules [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.843Z <app:null> Reactor build latest-25328-b2ed1365 starting on v24.11.1 /usr/local/bin/node [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.844Z <app:null> Process ID 1 user/group 0/0; docker; platform linux/x64 #161-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 22 14:25:40 UTC 2025; locale (undefined) [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.844Z <app:null> Basedir /opt/reactor; data in /var/reactor/storage [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.844Z <app:null> NODE_PATH=/opt/reactor:/opt/reactor/node_modules [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.865Z <app:null> Resolved timezone=America/New_York, environment TZ=America/New_York; offset minutes from UTC=-300 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.867Z <default:null> Module i18n v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.867Z <app:null> Configured locale (undefined); selected locale(s) en-US.UTF-8 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.879Z <app:null> Loaded locale en-US for en-US [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.879Z <app:null> Local date/time using configured timezone and locale formatting is "11/30/2025, 3:01:53 PM" [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.889Z <Structure:null> Module Structure v25326 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.890Z <Capabilities:null> Module Capabilities v24312 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.904Z <Plugin:null> Module Plugin v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.923Z <Timer:null> Module Timer v25279 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.924Z <TimerBroker:null> Module TimerBroker v25314 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.927Z <Entity:null> Module Entity v25251 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.929Z <Controller:null> Module Controller v25253 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.930Z <AlertManager:null> Module AlertManager v25318 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.937Z <default:null> Module Ruleset v25283 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.937Z <default:null> Module Rulesets v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.942Z <GlobalExpression:null> Module GlobalExpression v25258 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.953Z <Predicate:null> Module Predicate v25328 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.956Z <Rule:null> Module Rule v25323 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.958Z <GlobalReaction:null> Module GlobalReaction v25292 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.959Z <Engine:null> Module Engine v25325 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.964Z <httpapi:null> Module httpapi v25328 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.972Z <wsapi:null> Module wsapi v25328 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.994Z <TaskQueue:null> Module TaskQueue 24138 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.994Z <VeraController:null> Module VeraController v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:54.179Z <HassController:null> Module HassController v25325 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:13.797Z <OWMWeatherController:null> Module OWMWeatherController v25268 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:13.800Z <SystemController:null> Module SystemController v25323 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:13.807Z <MQTTController:null> Module MQTTController v22092 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:20.630Z <OWMWeatherController:CRIT> FetchError: request to https://api.openweathermap.org/data/2.5/weather?lat=xxxxxxxxxx&lon=-xxxxxxxxx&appid=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&units=standard&_r=1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxfailed, reason: [-] FetchError: request to https://api.openweathermap.org/data/2.5/weather?lat=xxxxxxxxxxx&lon=-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&appid=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&units=standard&_r=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxfailed, reason: at ClientRequest.<anonymous> (/opt/reactor/node_modules/node-fetch/lib/index.js:1501:11) at ClientRequest.emit (node:events:508:28) at ClientRequest.emit (node:domain:489:12) at emitErrorEvent (node:_http_client:108:11) at TLSSocket.socketErrorListener (node:_http_client:575:5) at TLSSocket.emit (node:events:508:28) at TLSSocket.emit (node:domain:489:12) at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8) at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3) at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:89:21
Multi-System Reactor
Date/time condition
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
30 Posts 4 Posters 5.6k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

    @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

    Okay, so like this?

    Almost. filter_expression should be indented at the same level as select (so two spaces back from what you've shown).

    Also, you have entity.attributes.binary_sensor = true in your filter expression. A couple of errors there. binary_sensor is a capability, so you need to specify the attribute in that capability you want to look at, which is state. That is, you want entity.attributes.binary_sensor.state. Then, you are using the assignment operation = rather than the equality comparison operator ==. And finally, you don't need to make an equality comparison to true or false, because state is already boolean true or false, so you're basically saying if true == true which is true already, or if false == true which is false already... you don't need the == operator or its operand here.

    The same caution above applies to your rule. Get out of the habit of using == with the word true in conditions when testing a boolean attribute, and instead use the is TRUE or is FALSE operators provided. The way you've done it, that operand is a string in the rule condition, so you're forcing an extra conversion and assumption of data type when you use == and true... the is TRUE and is FALSE operators (which take no operand) are more efficient. You even used them in your second condition, so just follow that model.

    T Offline
    T Offline
    tamorgen
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

    The same caution above applies to your rule. Get out of the habit of using == with the word true in conditions when testing a boolean attribute, and instead use the is TRUE or is FALSE operators provided. That operand is a string in the rule condition, so you're forcing an extra conversion and assumption of data type when you use == and true... the is TRUE and is FALSE operators (which take no operand) are more efficient. You even used them in your second condition, so just follow that model.

    Ha, good catch! I didn 't even notice I did that. I usually do try to use "is True", I just missed this one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

      Okay, so like this?

      Almost. filter_expression should be indented at the same level as select (so two spaces back from what you've shown).

      Also, you have entity.attributes.binary_sensor = true in your filter expression. A couple of errors there. binary_sensor is a capability, so you need to specify the attribute in that capability you want to look at, which is state. That is, you want entity.attributes.binary_sensor.state. Then, you are using the assignment operation = rather than the equality comparison operator ==. And finally, you don't need to make an equality comparison to true or false, because state is already boolean true or false, so you're basically saying if true == true which is true already, or if false == true which is false already... you don't need the == operator or its operand here.

      The same caution above applies to your rule. Get out of the habit of using == with the word true in conditions when testing a boolean attribute, and instead use the is TRUE or is FALSE operators provided. The way you've done it, that operand is a string in the rule condition, so you're forcing an extra conversion and assumption of data type when you use == and true... the is TRUE and is FALSE operators (which take no operand) are more efficient. You even used them in your second condition, so just follow that model.

      T Offline
      T Offline
      tamorgen
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

      Also, you have entity.attributes.binary_sensor = true in your filter expression. A couple of errors there. binary_sensor is a capability, so you need to specify the attribute in that capability you want to look at, which is state. That is, you want entity.attributes.binary_sensor.state. Then, you are using the assignment operation = rather than the equality comparison operator ==. And finally, you don't need to make an equality comparison to true or false, because state is already boolean true or false, so you're basically saying if true == true which is true already, or if false == true which is false already... you don't need the == operator or its operand here.

      So like this:

                "window_sensors":
                  select:
                    - include_entity:
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_office_windows'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_basement_window'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_family_room_double_window'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_family_room_fireplace_left'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_family_room_fireplace_right'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_garage_window_back_lower'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_garage_window_back_upper'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_garage_window_front_lower'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_garage_window_front_upper'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_guest_room_windows'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_mama_cave_windows'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_master_bathroom_window'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_master_bedroom_windows'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_mia_s_room_windows'
                      - 'haas>binary_sensor_mud_room_window'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_morning_room_left'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_morning_room_left_middle'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_morning_room_middle'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_morning_room_right_middle'
                      - 'hass>binary_sensor_morning_room_right'
                  filter_expression: >
                    entity.attributes.binary_sensor.state
      
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        Seems OK

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          Seems OK

          T Offline
          T Offline
          tamorgen
          wrote on last edited by tamorgen
          #15

          @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

          Seems OK

          It's still not tripping in MSR when I open a window.

          This is what is being shown when all the windows are closed. I'm not really paying atention to the comparssion value, jsut the current value it's displaying. That value isn't changing.

          589719a4-62af-420a-aefe-83ceb44a5801-image.png

          I tried it with sys_group.members as well.

          87f1c786-11f3-475c-9e3e-99adf122f89e-image.png

          None of the comparisons seem to make any difference. Current value: array:0) "" remains the same in any state of the windows.

          T 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Go to your Entities list, and find the window_sensors group entity, look at its attributes while you open and close a listed sensor. If it's not changing, then you either have an error in your DGC configuration, or the device(s) aren't responding as expected.

            Remember also your basic troubleshooting steps: any time something doesn't work the way you expect it to, go look in the log files for messages. DGC configures groups at startup, so look at the messages logged for DynamicGroupController during startup.

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              Go to your Entities list, and find the window_sensors group entity, look at its attributes while you open and close a listed sensor. If it's not changing, then you either have an error in your DGC configuration, or the device(s) aren't responding as expected.

              Remember also your basic troubleshooting steps: any time something doesn't work the way you expect it to, go look in the log files for messages. DGC configures groups at startup, so look at the messages logged for DynamicGroupController during startup.

              T Offline
              T Offline
              tamorgen
              wrote on last edited by tamorgen
              #17

              @toggledbits
              I was just going around the hosue and testing different windows.

              Some of the windows seem to work. When I use sys_group.empty (primary), the value when all the windows are closed is True: The windows that are working, the boolean changes to false and the Local Expression value (window_names) changes to that window. I'm going to have to pinpoint which windows aren't working correctly. It could be an issue in the HA configuration.yaml for the DSC/Envisalink entries. That's for me to figure out.

              The only other issue is the message. It's not sending the value of the string. I'm receiving $ Opened!

              message: ${{ window_names }} Opened!
              

              Edit: The one I had been testing with, right next to my office desk, does change in the entities tab.

              Office Windows
              hass>binary_sensor_office_windows
              true
              1:38:38 PM

              Edit 2: I copied and pasted from the Entities tab the Office Windows Canoncial ID into the reactor.yaml config. Even though they looked identical, once I restarted reactor, that window is now responding properly. I suspect I may have hidden characters in the ones that aren't functioning.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T tamorgen

                @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                Seems OK

                It's still not tripping in MSR when I open a window.

                This is what is being shown when all the windows are closed. I'm not really paying atention to the comparssion value, jsut the current value it's displaying. That value isn't changing.

                589719a4-62af-420a-aefe-83ceb44a5801-image.png

                I tried it with sys_group.members as well.

                87f1c786-11f3-475c-9e3e-99adf122f89e-image.png

                None of the comparisons seem to make any difference. Current value: array:0) "" remains the same in any state of the windows.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                tamorgen
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                Seems OK

                It's still not tripping in MSR when I open a window.

                This is what is being shown when all the windows are closed. I'm not really paying atention to the comparssion value, jsut the current value it's displaying. That value isn't changing.

                589719a4-62af-420a-aefe-83ceb44a5801-image.png

                I tried it with sys_group.members as well.

                87f1c786-11f3-475c-9e3e-99adf122f89e-image.png

                None of the comparisons seem to make any difference. Current value: array:0) "" remains the same in any state of the windows.

                I went back to all the windows in the reactor.yaml file and copied the values directly from the Entities tab. They are all now working.

                The only thing not working is the notification. Any ideas what the cause could be?

                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T tamorgen

                  @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                  @toggledbits said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                  Seems OK

                  It's still not tripping in MSR when I open a window.

                  This is what is being shown when all the windows are closed. I'm not really paying atention to the comparssion value, jsut the current value it's displaying. That value isn't changing.

                  589719a4-62af-420a-aefe-83ceb44a5801-image.png

                  I tried it with sys_group.members as well.

                  87f1c786-11f3-475c-9e3e-99adf122f89e-image.png

                  None of the comparisons seem to make any difference. Current value: array:0) "" remains the same in any state of the windows.

                  I went back to all the windows in the reactor.yaml file and copied the values directly from the Entities tab. They are all now working.

                  The only thing not working is the notification. Any ideas what the cause could be?

                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                  The only thing not working is the notification. Any ideas what the cause could be?

                  You have:

                  message: ${{ window_names }} Opened!
                  

                  That stands out because it's not valid YAML. Missing quotes.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @tamorgen said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                    The only thing not working is the notification. Any ideas what the cause could be?

                    You have:

                    message: ${{ window_names }} Opened!
                    

                    That stands out because it's not valid YAML. Missing quotes.

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    tamorgen
                    wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                    #20

                    @toggledbits, how should the quotes work for a MSR variable in yaml? I copied your example in the second post, but you aren’t calling a HA function. I’ve been playing around with it, but I’m not getting the variable in the system call.

                    I’m looking at this documentation for HA.

                    Home Assistant

                    Script Syntax

                    Script Syntax

                    Documentation for the Home Assistant Script Syntax.

                    They show an example

                    
                    data: 
                        message: "{{ blind_state_message }}"
                    
                    

                    So, in theory,

                        message: "{{ window_names }}" opened.
                    

                    should be valid. The difference here is that window_names is coming from the local expression.

                    However, MSR throws an error, telling me that I have invalid service data.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • CrilleC Offline
                      CrilleC Offline
                      Crille
                      wrote on last edited by Crille
                      #21

                      @tamorgen You need MSR to evaluate the whole data being sent

                      ${{ { “message”: window_names + “ opened!” } }}
                      
                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • CrilleC Crille

                        @tamorgen You need MSR to evaluate the whole data being sent

                        ${{ { “message”: window_names + “ opened!” } }}
                        
                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        tamorgen
                        wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                        #22

                        @Crille said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                        @tamorgen You need MSR to evaluate the whole data being sent

                        ${{ { “message”: window_names + “ opened!” } }}
                        

                        That's not working either. It actually disables the Play button at he end of Entity Action.

                        This is a system call on home assistant (call_service) to send a notification via the HA companion app. The message: text isn't part of the message to be sent, it's yaml code that is part of the data field.

                        For example, I have another reaction that sends a message to my phone when my washing machine has completed a cycle.

                        Screen Shot 2023-02-23 at 5.56.40 PM.png

                        The word message doesn't appear on my phone, just the data after it.

                        Here is my current rule:

                        Screen Shot 2023-02-23 at 5.59.30 PM.png

                        In the Local Expressions, you can see Last value: (string) "Office Windows", so that value should be returned for window_names in the system call.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • PablaP Offline
                          PablaP Offline
                          Pabla
                          wrote on last edited by Pabla
                          #23

                          Try without the spaces so it looks like this message: ${{window_names}} Open. MSR supports both JSON and Yaml, but you just gotta make sure theres no errors. Usually online validators help with this

                          T 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • CrilleC Offline
                            CrilleC Offline
                            Crille
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            Try my example by hitting the general play button for Reaction.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • PablaP Pabla

                              Try without the spaces so it looks like this message: ${{window_names}} Open. MSR supports both JSON and Yaml, but you just gotta make sure theres no errors. Usually online validators help with this

                              T Offline
                              T Offline
                              tamorgen
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              @Pabla said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                              Try without the spaces so it looks like this message: ${{window_names}} Open. MSR supports both JSON and Yaml, but you just gotta make sure theres no errors. Usually online validators help with this

                              Doesn't work. MSR throws this error.

                              Screen Shot 2023-02-23 at 6.10.33 PM.png

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • PablaP Offline
                                PablaP Offline
                                Pabla
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                I don't think you have it written correctly here's an example of how I have it used in one of my own notifications
                                image.png

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • PablaP Pabla

                                  Try without the spaces so it looks like this message: ${{window_names}} Open. MSR supports both JSON and Yaml, but you just gotta make sure theres no errors. Usually online validators help with this

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  tamorgen
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @Pabla said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                                  Try without the spaces so it looks like this message: ${{window_names}} Open. MSR supports both JSON and Yaml, but you just gotta make sure theres no errors. Usually online validators help with this

                                  That triggers the notification, but the value isn't returned.

                                  IMG_B67DDA55F775-1.jpeg

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • PablaP Offline
                                    PablaP Offline
                                    Pabla
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    Don't use the play button next to the action, use the play button right under set reaction

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • PablaP Pabla

                                      Don't use the play button next to the action, use the play button right under set reaction

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      tamorgen
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @Pabla said in Is it possible to use a single reaction for multiple entities as variables?:

                                      Don't use the play button next to the action, use the play button right under set reaction

                                      Well that makes a difference! This has been driving me nuts all afternoon. Thanks for cluing me in!

                                      IMG_F4FBD5E781DD-1.jpeg

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbits
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        It should look like this:

                                        message: "${{window_names}} Open"
                                        

                                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        Recent Topics

                                        • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                                          CatmanV2C
                                          CatmanV2
                                          0
                                          9
                                          362

                                        • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          0
                                          4
                                          113

                                        • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                          therealdbT
                                          therealdb
                                          1
                                          8
                                          268

                                        • Difficulty defining repeating annual period
                                          G
                                          gwp1
                                          0
                                          5
                                          68

                                        • Need help with sequence
                                          therealdbT
                                          therealdb
                                          0
                                          3
                                          41

                                        • Possible feature request?
                                          therealdbT
                                          therealdb
                                          0
                                          5
                                          151

                                        • Copying a global reaction
                                          tunnusT
                                          tunnus
                                          0
                                          1
                                          41

                                        • Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
                                          CatmanV2C
                                          CatmanV2
                                          0
                                          11
                                          321

                                        • Time series documentation
                                          tunnusT
                                          tunnus
                                          0
                                          11
                                          379

                                        • MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
                                          CatmanV2C
                                          CatmanV2
                                          0
                                          3
                                          148

                                        • Reset a delay
                                          CatmanV2C
                                          CatmanV2
                                          0
                                          8
                                          211
                                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • Unsolved