Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
Condition for trend
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Struggling to setup my first Tasmota device and MQTT
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Existing Rule stopped working HTTP command fetching IP address from website
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Set reaction triggering wrong z-wave device
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
cw-kidC
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC. Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc. Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box? Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Self test
CatmanV2C
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something? Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor

Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
22 Posts 4 Posters 5.3k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G gwp1

    @tamorgen reading thru this twice (and I may go back again and slow down even more) it sounds like there's no "link" between your rulesets. ie, the conditions for AWAY is being met even though the conditions for GUEST are, too.

    What does your AWAY ruleset look like?

    Here is my GUEST from AWAY ruleset (I don't have the luxury of surfacing the individual user code so I'm stuck being a bit more generic, ie "lock unlocked". As HOME requires my presence, this has been doing the trick.) My only issue: sometimes the lock is slow to report it's state so I've asked my authorized guests to enter their code, count to 10, the open the door. That let's Hubitat Safety Monitor to disarm.

    d06a8909-4d4f-4aab-a9d5-acde0a00b60e-image.png

    Here is my Change to AWAY for comparison sake.

    4f9fc608-61b8-4571-b649-a00aef491ac9-image.png 8c63571e-40b5-4fa4-b7d1-5d44759e44a0-image.png

    @toggledbits gave me very sound advise early on as I was prone to making my rulesets "do too much" in addition to waaaaaay overthinking/overcomplicating things.

    Instead of trying to make a ruleset that determines presence AND tries to set mode, just have it determine presence. Have one for your immediate family and one for your guests. Then use the TRUE FALSE state of them in your mode rules. (Saves you countless hours later, too, when you add/remove people from either presence ruleset.)

    T Offline
    T Offline
    tamorgen
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @gwp1 ,
    So, the conditions for Away, are essentially the reset of the "Phones Home" rule. If no phones are home, and the conditions for Guest haven't been set, then it's going the "Phones Home" rule becomes false and resets itself.

    The Guest mode is met (or supposed to be) when the user code from my home alarm is read for 2 specific user IDs, or I have manually set the mode to Guest from Home Assistant (it's a input select value, the last screen shot in my last post). Unfortunately, this only works properly if someone in the HA companion app users is home to put the mode into Guest.

    The Guest mode ends when a HA companion app user arrives back home.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G gwp1

      @tamorgen reading thru this twice (and I may go back again and slow down even more) it sounds like there's no "link" between your rulesets. ie, the conditions for AWAY is being met even though the conditions for GUEST are, too.

      What does your AWAY ruleset look like?

      Here is my GUEST from AWAY ruleset (I don't have the luxury of surfacing the individual user code so I'm stuck being a bit more generic, ie "lock unlocked". As HOME requires my presence, this has been doing the trick.) My only issue: sometimes the lock is slow to report it's state so I've asked my authorized guests to enter their code, count to 10, the open the door. That let's Hubitat Safety Monitor to disarm.

      d06a8909-4d4f-4aab-a9d5-acde0a00b60e-image.png

      Here is my Change to AWAY for comparison sake.

      4f9fc608-61b8-4571-b649-a00aef491ac9-image.png 8c63571e-40b5-4fa4-b7d1-5d44759e44a0-image.png

      @toggledbits gave me very sound advise early on as I was prone to making my rulesets "do too much" in addition to waaaaaay overthinking/overcomplicating things.

      Instead of trying to make a ruleset that determines presence AND tries to set mode, just have it determine presence. Have one for your immediate family and one for your guests. Then use the TRUE FALSE state of them in your mode rules. (Saves you countless hours later, too, when you add/remove people from either presence ruleset.)

      T Offline
      T Offline
      tamorgen
      wrote on last edited by
      #9
      This post is deleted!
      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T tamorgen

        This post is deleted!

        T Offline
        T Offline
        tamorgen
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

        @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

        @toggledbits gave me very sound advise early on as I was prone to making my rulesets "do too much" in addition to waaaaaay overthinking/overcomplicating things.

        Instead of trying to make a ruleset that determines presence AND tries to set mode, just have it determine presence. Have one for your immediate family and one for your guests. Then use the TRUE FALSE state of them in your mode rules. (Saves you countless hours later, too, when you add/remove people from either presence ruleset.)

        That is essentially what I'm doing. The "Phones Home" doesn't set the mode, except to reset it. I suppose I could make the reset a separate rule, but I'm not sure how that would solve my problem.

        And it's 100% possible I'm overthinking this, or I'm in so deep, that I'm not seeing the obvious. Many of these rules were built on the original Reactor in Vera, before converting to MSR. I had to work with the limitations of Vera at the time, and of course the plug-ins that stopped working quite regularly.

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T tamorgen

          said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

          @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

          @toggledbits gave me very sound advise early on as I was prone to making my rulesets "do too much" in addition to waaaaaay overthinking/overcomplicating things.

          Instead of trying to make a ruleset that determines presence AND tries to set mode, just have it determine presence. Have one for your immediate family and one for your guests. Then use the TRUE FALSE state of them in your mode rules. (Saves you countless hours later, too, when you add/remove people from either presence ruleset.)

          That is essentially what I'm doing. The "Phones Home" doesn't set the mode, except to reset it. I suppose I could make the reset a separate rule, but I'm not sure how that would solve my problem.

          And it's 100% possible I'm overthinking this, or I'm in so deep, that I'm not seeing the obvious. Many of these rules were built on the original Reactor in Vera, before converting to MSR. I had to work with the limitations of Vera at the time, and of course the plug-ins that stopped working quite regularly.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          @tamorgen You're falling into the same pitfalls I did. Notice my Mode SETs don't have resets. No need. The next appropriate rule SETs so there's no reason to reset. Any resets (like from GUEST back to AWAY or VACA) are done via their own SET rulesets.

          I don't want to reset... I want to move on to another Mode - even if that mode happens to be the last mode I was in. Make sense?

          One thing I have done: every time I change mode I write it to an expression called previous_mode. This let's me do things like "if the previous mode was AWAY, return to AWAY - but if the previous mode was VACA, return to VAC" -- again, these being sep SET rulesets and not RESETs.

          Every time I tried to make use of RESETs I got buried as I had too many "what ifs" in my Conditions.

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HAOS
          Core 2026.1.1
          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
          FW: v1.1
          SDK: v7.23.1

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            tamorgen
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

            @tamorgen You're falling into the same pitfalls I did. Notice my Mode SETs don't have resets. No need. The next appropriate rule SETs so there's no reason to reset. Any resets (like from GUEST back to AWAY or VACA) are done via their own SET rulesets.

            Okay, I think I've made progress thanks to your suggestion.

            I took the thought of creating a new rule for "Go to Away Mode", and removed the reset from "Phones Home".

            In the new "Go to Away Mode" rule, I added a condition that the mode needs to "Phones Home" rule needs to be sustained for 60 seconds.
            688c0605-c4f5-4903-8b70-e1571c6f29f1-image.png This at least makes it specific, as to what my rules do.

            Next I tried to toggle the house mode in Home Assistant, and well, it immediately changed to "Home", which is different than what I expected.

            So now, the "Go To Home Mode" rule is being tripped. I added a very short 15 second "must be sustained" condition for the "Phones Home" rule state in that rule, and now it lets me change the drop down to Guest Mode. Unfortunately, 15 seconds later, i changes to Home mode, then it changes to Away mode. I feel like this is progress, but I need to figure out why it's not staying in Guest mode

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Offline
              T Offline
              tamorgen
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              Okay, this actually seems to be working. I needed to disarm my home alarm first, then put it in Guest mode. It appears be holding now.

              Next test, is I need to disarm the system with one of the guest users to see if it stays disabled.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Offline
                T Offline
                tamorgen
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                Test appears to be successful. I was able to use one of the guest users PINs for the alarm panel, and the system went into and stayed in Guest mode. Thanks to @gwp1 for reminding me to keep it simple and get rid of the reset.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T tamorgen

                  @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                  @tamorgen You're falling into the same pitfalls I did. Notice my Mode SETs don't have resets. No need. The next appropriate rule SETs so there's no reason to reset. Any resets (like from GUEST back to AWAY or VACA) are done via their own SET rulesets.

                  Okay, I think I've made progress thanks to your suggestion.

                  I took the thought of creating a new rule for "Go to Away Mode", and removed the reset from "Phones Home".

                  In the new "Go to Away Mode" rule, I added a condition that the mode needs to "Phones Home" rule needs to be sustained for 60 seconds.
                  688c0605-c4f5-4903-8b70-e1571c6f29f1-image.png This at least makes it specific, as to what my rules do.

                  Next I tried to toggle the house mode in Home Assistant, and well, it immediately changed to "Home", which is different than what I expected.

                  So now, the "Go To Home Mode" rule is being tripped. I added a very short 15 second "must be sustained" condition for the "Phones Home" rule state in that rule, and now it lets me change the drop down to Guest Mode. Unfortunately, 15 seconds later, i changes to Home mode, then it changes to Away mode. I feel like this is progress, but I need to figure out why it's not staying in Guest mode

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  @tamorgen said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                  In the new "Go to Away Mode" rule, I added a condition that the mode needs to "Phones Home" rule needs to be sustained for 60 seconds.

                  Doesn't the result of that mean the system waits for someone to be home for 60 seconds before flipping mode to HOME?

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HAOS
                  Core 2026.1.1
                  w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                  FW: v1.1
                  SDK: v7.23.1

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T tamorgen

                    Test appears to be successful. I was able to use one of the guest users PINs for the alarm panel, and the system went into and stayed in Guest mode. Thanks to @gwp1 for reminding me to keep it simple and get rid of the reset.

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    gwp1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    @tamorgen said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                    Thanks to @gwp1 for reminding me to keep it simple

                    The thanks goes to @toggledbits who has long endured my questions on things only to have him say "wow... pare this down to smaller bits". Essentially, don't try to do things with "one big beautiful ruleset". 😁

                    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                    *HAOS
                    Core 2026.1.1
                    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                    FW: v1.1
                    SDK: v7.23.1

                    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                    MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                    MQTTController: 25139
                    ZWave Controller: 25139

                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G gwp1

                      @tamorgen said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                      In the new "Go to Away Mode" rule, I added a condition that the mode needs to "Phones Home" rule needs to be sustained for 60 seconds.

                      Doesn't the result of that mean the system waits for someone to be home for 60 seconds before flipping mode to HOME?

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      tamorgen
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @gwp1, no only away. The Home mode is only 15 seconds.

                      287d259d-cdc8-40e8-a723-e754ebfcb5f4-image.png

                      However, since the "Phones Home" rule is a geofence rule (based upon the HA companion app), it detects the phone being there before I'm actually in the house. The Home mode does not disarm the alarm system, that is still manually done at the keypad. The only delay would be lights automatically turning on, or blinds opening during the day.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • G gwp1

                        @tamorgen said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                        Thanks to @gwp1 for reminding me to keep it simple

                        The thanks goes to @toggledbits who has long endured my questions on things only to have him say "wow... pare this down to smaller bits". Essentially, don't try to do things with "one big beautiful ruleset". 😁

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        tamorgen
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                        Essentially, don't try to do things with "one big beautiful ruleset"

                        Seriously. It can't be done, but sometimes I swear I've paired it down into so many individual functions, I forget how it all works together. When I'm troubleshooting, I have to go back and look at the rules, and think "what was I trying to do here again?"

                        T toggledbitsT 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • T tamorgen

                          @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                          Essentially, don't try to do things with "one big beautiful ruleset"

                          Seriously. It can't be done, but sometimes I swear I've paired it down into so many individual functions, I forget how it all works together. When I'm troubleshooting, I have to go back and look at the rules, and think "what was I trying to do here again?"

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          tamorgen
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                          @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                          Essentially, don't try to do things with "one big beautiful ruleset"

                          Seriously. It can't be done in one, but sometimes I swear I've paired it down into so many individual functions, I forget how it all works together. When I'm troubleshooting, I have to go back and look at the rules, and think "what was I trying to do here again?"

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T tamorgen

                            @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                            Essentially, don't try to do things with "one big beautiful ruleset"

                            Seriously. It can't be done, but sometimes I swear I've paired it down into so many individual functions, I forget how it all works together. When I'm troubleshooting, I have to go back and look at the rules, and think "what was I trying to do here again?"

                            toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbits
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            @tamorgen said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

                            I have to go back and look at the rules, and think "what was I trying to do here again?"

                            I have the same problem, and I wrote the darned thing. Use the comments. They really help.

                            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • therealdbT Offline
                              therealdbT Offline
                              therealdb
                              wrote on last edited by therealdb
                              #21

                              Also, for me a virtual device instead of checking for rule states seems to be less prone to errors. So I have one for home status, guests, party etc and the rules are much easier to write.

                              --
                              On a mission to automate everything.

                              My MS Reactor contrib
                              My Luup Plug-ins

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • therealdbT therealdb

                                Also, for me a virtual device instead of checking for rule states seems to be less prone to errors. So I have one for home status, guests, party etc and the rules are much easier to write.

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                gwp1
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                @therealdb I use those as well. As you see in my AWAY rule there's a catch there using a virtual switch for my calendar integration. If a calendar entry has a specific keyword it turns the switch on. If the switch is on, AWAY knows not to fire.... VACA has it covered.

                                @toggledbits beat me to it: comments, comments, comments. I've lost too many years off my life trying to remember why this rule does what it does and how.

                                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                *HAOS
                                Core 2026.1.1
                                w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                                FW: v1.1
                                SDK: v7.23.1

                                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                                MQTTController: 25139
                                ZWave Controller: 25139

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                Recent Topics

                                • Condition for trend
                                  T
                                  tamorgen
                                  0
                                  7
                                  186

                                • Struggling to setup my first Tasmota device and MQTT
                                  cw-kidC
                                  cw-kid
                                  0
                                  23
                                  337

                                • Raspberry Pi 4 dual RAM variant introduced to mitigate RAM price increases
                                  A
                                  a-lurker
                                  0
                                  2
                                  172

                                • Existing Rule stopped working HTTP command fetching IP address from website
                                  toggledbitsT
                                  toggledbits
                                  0
                                  12
                                  349

                                • Set reaction triggering wrong z-wave device
                                  T
                                  tamorgen
                                  0
                                  19
                                  573

                                • Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
                                  CatmanV2C
                                  CatmanV2
                                  0
                                  12
                                  380

                                • RPi Alternative: Orange Pi 4 LTS (3GB RAM/16GB eMMC)
                                  toggledbitsT
                                  toggledbits
                                  0
                                  2
                                  1.9k

                                • RPi Alternative: Orange Pi Zero 2 (1GB)
                                  toggledbitsT
                                  toggledbits
                                  2
                                  3
                                  3.6k

                                • RPi Alternative: Libre Computer AML-S905X-CC "Le Potato" (2GB RAM)
                                  toggledbitsT
                                  toggledbits
                                  5
                                  6
                                  3.2k

                                • HA and AI
                                  therealdbT
                                  therealdb
                                  0
                                  4
                                  229

                                • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                                  CatmanV2C
                                  CatmanV2
                                  0
                                  26
                                  780

                                • This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
                                  toggledbitsT
                                  toggledbits
                                  0
                                  18
                                  553
                                Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Unsolved