Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Sunrise/Sunset data
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor

Sunrise/Sunset data

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
12 Posts 4 Posters 1.4k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S SweetGenius

    I would like to be able to get the current sunrise or sunset times in human readable format from MSR so I can pass the values to Hubitat. I can set a variable on the Hubitat virtual omni sensor but I need some ideas of how to get the data. Is there a variable, expression or how do I convert
    suninfo.sunrise=1629978877000. Is there a better way? Thanks

    3 Offline
    3 Offline
    3rdStng
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Hubitat is already aware of the sunrise and sunset time. This is determined by your Location settings. I'm not entirely sure how to pull it out, if you are looking to display it on a dashboard. If you go into System Events, you will see the Sunrise and Sunset times.2021-08-26_223226.jpg

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 3 3rdStng

      Hubitat is already aware of the sunrise and sunset time. This is determined by your Location settings. I'm not entirely sure how to pull it out, if you are looking to display it on a dashboard. If you go into System Events, you will see the Sunrise and Sunset times.2021-08-26_223226.jpg

      S Offline
      S Offline
      SweetGenius
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      @3rdstng Yes, Since I have moved my logic off of Hubitat to MSR, I wanted to have the actual source of my triggers displayed on the Hubitat dashboard as I still use that. The time might be slightly different between the two systems. Thanks

      Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSun
        wrote on last edited by LibraSun
        #4

        Try establishing a Global Expression containing this definition:
        getEntity( "weather>default" ).attributes.wx

        The resulting object should include the data you seek.

        EDIT: Except, oops, it does not. Sorry, false start.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • LibraSunL Offline
          LibraSunL Offline
          LibraSun
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          I know that Sunset and Sunrise times are included with GET calls to:
          http://api.openweathermap.org/data/2.5/weather

          All you need is an API key and your ZIP code (or other identifier) in the calling URL.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Away
            toggledbitsT Away
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #6

            getEntity( "reactor_system>sun" ).attributes.suninfo.sunset (or .sunrise or .civil_dawn or ...) is the attribute you're looking for.

            I still haven't hooked up a strftime() function in the expressions. Let me take care of that today and I'll post a new build at the end of the day.

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • toggledbitsT Away
              toggledbitsT Away
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              strftime() is now part of new build 21239. docs

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                strftime() is now part of new build 21239. docs

                S Offline
                S Offline
                SweetGenius
                wrote on last edited by SweetGenius
                #8

                The function strftime() works good. So now I have to say that I don't have a clue what I am doing with expressions. I created a global expression and it returns the correct value.
                Screen Shot 2021-08-28 at 9.20.52 PM.png

                I need some help on how to get this to Hubitat. I can pass data using a Virtual Omni Sensor in Hubitat and manually entering data in the x_hubitat_extra_commands.setVariable. I thought I could use the perfromAction but I am confused on how the expressions are supposed to work. It looks like it just assigns to a variable so I don't know how to do a performAction.

                Screen Shot 2021-08-28 at 9.31.33 PM.png

                Can someone give me some gentle advice so I can learn this?

                Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.

                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S SweetGenius

                  The function strftime() works good. So now I have to say that I don't have a clue what I am doing with expressions. I created a global expression and it returns the correct value.
                  Screen Shot 2021-08-28 at 9.20.52 PM.png

                  I need some help on how to get this to Hubitat. I can pass data using a Virtual Omni Sensor in Hubitat and manually entering data in the x_hubitat_extra_commands.setVariable. I thought I could use the perfromAction but I am confused on how the expressions are supposed to work. It looks like it just assigns to a variable so I don't know how to do a performAction.

                  Screen Shot 2021-08-28 at 9.31.33 PM.png

                  Can someone give me some gentle advice so I can learn this?

                  toggledbitsT Away
                  toggledbitsT Away
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                  #9

                  @sweetgenius @sweetgenius Well, first, you're going to do either of the above actions, not both. And I would recommend against the performAction() expression, because it will execute every time the rule is evaluated, not just when the rule is set, which is guaranteed to be more frequent than that, and maybe annoyingly/incorrectly so.

                  The arguments for the freeform/native Hubitat action are Hubitat dependent/device implementation dependent, and I have no idea what they are... you need to look at the definition of the Omni sensor device, and specifically that action. But since most Hubitat actions only take one value, you might try leaving argument2 blank and using this for argument1: ${{ sunsetE }}

                  This will do a substitution with the value of sunsetE. Substitutions are mentioned in the documentation. Look at the reactor.log file to see what is sent and returned.

                  Since global variables are only updated when used, your sunsetE variable is not going to update automatically every day. This rule you are setting up needs to set daily after midnight at some point. This will both update sunsetE and cause it to be sent to the device.

                  Also, you can avoid the need for ltrim() in your expression by using %-l format for the hour. The - modifier removes padding.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @sweetgenius @sweetgenius Well, first, you're going to do either of the above actions, not both. And I would recommend against the performAction() expression, because it will execute every time the rule is evaluated, not just when the rule is set, which is guaranteed to be more frequent than that, and maybe annoyingly/incorrectly so.

                    The arguments for the freeform/native Hubitat action are Hubitat dependent/device implementation dependent, and I have no idea what they are... you need to look at the definition of the Omni sensor device, and specifically that action. But since most Hubitat actions only take one value, you might try leaving argument2 blank and using this for argument1: ${{ sunsetE }}

                    This will do a substitution with the value of sunsetE. Substitutions are mentioned in the documentation. Look at the reactor.log file to see what is sent and returned.

                    Since global variables are only updated when used, your sunsetE variable is not going to update automatically every day. This rule you are setting up needs to set daily after midnight at some point. This will both update sunsetE and cause it to be sent to the device.

                    Also, you can avoid the need for ltrim() in your expression by using %-l format for the hour. The - modifier removes padding.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    SweetGenius
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @toggledbits Yes, I was showing both to try to explain what I wanted to do and also the substitution did work in the argument1 box of the Omni sensor. The finished rule would be set to run after midnight.
                    Update, I went away from the Omni sensor and created hub variables on the Hubitat hub and made them visible to MSR. I am setting these variables with local expressions in the rule. Not sure if this is the best or most efficient way but it does work. Any other suggestions are welcomed but thank you for the help.
                    Here are the expressions.

                    Screen Shot 2021-08-29 at 4.56.46 PM.png

                    Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT Away
                      toggledbitsT Away
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Not recommended, as I said before, so use performAction in this way. The Entity Action action in the SET Reaction of your rule is the better choice.

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        Not recommended, as I said before, so use performAction in this way. The Entity Action action in the SET Reaction of your rule is the better choice.

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        SweetGenius
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        @toggledbits Whoops, I totally misread what you posted. I have corrected per you recommendations. Thanks

                        Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Recent Topics

                        • Error: Command timeout
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          2
                          9

                        • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          5
                          113

                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          5
                          130
                          74.0k

                        • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          6
                          133

                        • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          1
                          1
                          65

                        • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                          M
                          mgvra
                          1
                          3
                          150

                        • Script action and custom timers
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          4
                          158

                        • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          12
                          446

                        • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                          akbooerA
                          akbooer
                          1
                          2
                          128

                        • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          6
                          181

                        • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          17
                          535

                        • Shelly Wall Display XL
                          akbooerA
                          akbooer
                          2
                          9
                          845
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Unsolved