Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Catch-all lights rule
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Help with scene controller cycling logic
therealdbT
I’ve added a couple of Shelly Wave i4 as scene controllers and I’m planning to add more, since I can just use standard buttons instead of battery-powered scene controllers, which also looks better aesthetically. That said, I’m struggling to figure out how to write a simple rule that cycles between states every time I press a button. Example: Light 1 ON → OFF, then Light 2 ON → OFF. The part I can’t get right is handling the case where Light 1 or Light 2 might already be ON independently of the rule. Maybe it’s just too much sun and relaxation clouding my brain, but any hint would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
wmarcolinW
Use case: When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled. To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work. Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch. In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR. Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR. If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR. Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
Multi-System Reactor
Expose MSR entities
CatmanV2C
Probably a really dumb question. Currently I am using the owntracks_sensor for tracking phones being in region in MSR and it works great. Digging around with Home Assistant and toying with some dashboards, is there any way of exposing that sensor to HA trivially? I could set MSR to trip a virtual switch in OpenLuup which can then be exposed to HA (with all my other Vera devices) but that feels a bit in-elegant if I can do it directly. Any thoughts? Apologies if the ask is not clear/ TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Comment in Globa Expressions
Tom_DT
I have several Global Expressions that are set by a rule so the definition area is blank. I'd like to add a comment in this area that explains what is setting the value. Commenting in this area breaks the remote setting. Any way to document what is setting the GE?
Multi-System Reactor

Catch-all lights rule

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
7 Posts 2 Posters 807 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1

    Background: this is a Windows MSR install I've done for our local pool/amenity center just to run some fans and lights (not my daily driver at home). Install went perfectly fine.

    Scenario: I want the lights to go on when it's dark enough (even if during a storm, not just after sunset) so I'm using solarRadiation from my weather station to drive that Trigger. Easy stuff.

    Issue: sometimes, someone goes in the office and just starts flipping switches and the result can be lights turned on in the daytime or off at night. I'm trying to create a "catch-all" wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF.

    I have the following Reaction built:

    b30eab5b-5a14-4a3a-8c9a-47e3e7e53dc3-image.png

    I also have this Reaction for opposite, ie the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on:

    5c6946b1-297c-4eb1-9618-74820979df29-image.png

    Here are my two rules:

    288cba86-f941-4157-86d9-d8e7487905f7-image.png *NOTE that in my manual testing, ie I turn on the light switch at the incorrect time, when the solarRadiation level changes the Lights ON rule flags and shows as SET. On the next change of solarRadiation it goes back to reset again.

    My expectation is that Lights OFF rule should see the lights are on, the solarRadiation is above the set limit, and turn them off. Instead, every other run, the ON rule moves to SET and then reset again on the following run.

    Logs appear angry:

    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.696Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<RESET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.712Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<RESET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.713Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<RESET> all actions completed.
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.565Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#3" closed, code=1001, reason=
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.753Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.754Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.790Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.839Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#6" authorized
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:43.353Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:43.353Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.146Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#6" closed, code=1001, reason=
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.308Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.309Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.346Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.390Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#7" authorized
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:49.412Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:49.413Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.734Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#7" closed, code=1001, reason=
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.891Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.892Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.925Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.965Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#8" authorized
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:54.383Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:54.384Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:01.590Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.646Z <Rule:INFO> Lights OFF (rule-m6e33ja3 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.656Z <Rule:INFO> Lights ON (rule-m6e4ajh7 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.663Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights OFF<SET>" (rule-m6e33ja3:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.665Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<SET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.668Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights OFF<SET> (rule-m6e33ja3:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.669Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<SET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.669Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<SET> all actions completed.
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.675Z <Rule:INFO> Lights OFF (rule-m6e33ja3 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.680Z <Engine:NOTICE> ReactionHistory: no entry for
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.683Z <Engine:NOTICE> [Engine]Engine#1 entry 256 reaction rule-m6e33ja3:S-1q2f1j0p: [Error] terminated [parent terminating]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.683Z <Engine:CRIT> Error: terminated [parent terminating]
    Error: terminated
        at Engine._process_reaction_queue (C:\Users\Jalan\msr\reactor\server\lib\Engine.js:1644:47)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.699Z <Engine:NOTICE> [Engine]Engine#1 entry 254 reaction rule-m6e33ja3:S: [Error] terminated [preempted by rule state change]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.699Z <Engine:CRIT> Error: terminated [preempted by rule state change]
    Error: terminated
        at Engine._process_reaction_queue (C:\Users\Jalan\msr\reactor\server\lib\Engine.js:1644:47)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.700Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights OFF<RESET>" (rule-m6e33ja3:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.704Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights OFF<RESET> (rule-m6e33ja3:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.705Z <Engine:INFO> Lights OFF<RESET> all actions completed.
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.822Z <Rule:INFO> Lights ON (rule-m6e4ajh7 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.831Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<RESET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.847Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<RESET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.847Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<RESET> all actions completed.
    

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HASS 2025.11.1
    w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      You're not showing your RESET reactions for either rule.

      Edit: by the way, neither rule is looking at the lights, so when you say things like "the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on" and "wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF", you're not showing anything that literally does that. It would only happen by accident if/when solarRadiation changes, because that's the only thing you are looking at.

      Logs aren't angry at all. One message is missing a piece of data, but other than that, this looks as expected. Are you forgetting that the changes operator with no terminal values is just a pulse? So the rule(s) would be expected to set and reset very quickly, which it appears they are doing. It also appears that at least the "Lights OFF" rule has something in the reset reaction, so when the rule resets, the running set reaction will be stopped before it finishes (or maybe even before it starts), and the reset will be run. That's documented behavior. If you don't want your set reaction to be pre-empted, your reset reaction has to be completely empty, not even a comment.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      G 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        You're not showing your RESET reactions for either rule.

        Edit: by the way, neither rule is looking at the lights, so when you say things like "the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on" and "wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF", you're not showing anything that literally does that. It would only happen by accident if/when solarRadiation changes, because that's the only thing you are looking at.

        Logs aren't angry at all. One message is missing a piece of data, but other than that, this looks as expected. Are you forgetting that the changes operator with no terminal values is just a pulse? So the rule(s) would be expected to set and reset very quickly, which it appears they are doing. It also appears that at least the "Lights OFF" rule has something in the reset reaction, so when the rule resets, the running set reaction will be stopped before it finishes (or maybe even before it starts), and the reset will be run. That's documented behavior. If you don't want your set reaction to be pre-empted, your reset reaction has to be completely empty, not even a comment.

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits Interesting. Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HASS 2025.11.1
        w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          You're not showing your RESET reactions for either rule.

          Edit: by the way, neither rule is looking at the lights, so when you say things like "the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on" and "wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF", you're not showing anything that literally does that. It would only happen by accident if/when solarRadiation changes, because that's the only thing you are looking at.

          Logs aren't angry at all. One message is missing a piece of data, but other than that, this looks as expected. Are you forgetting that the changes operator with no terminal values is just a pulse? So the rule(s) would be expected to set and reset very quickly, which it appears they are doing. It also appears that at least the "Lights OFF" rule has something in the reset reaction, so when the rule resets, the running set reaction will be stopped before it finishes (or maybe even before it starts), and the reset will be run. That's documented behavior. If you don't want your set reaction to be pre-empted, your reset reaction has to be completely empty, not even a comment.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @toggledbits I did, however, deconstruct and reconstruct the Catch-All rule last night.

          16c862f3-89a9-46ee-8f36-0f80c068996d-image.png

          99108e45-e9f2-4abc-989f-0868a9a37545-image.png 95e6c0ee-65d0-4f37-9c14-bf0955cc32f3-image.png

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HASS 2025.11.1
          w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G gwp1

            @toggledbits I did, however, deconstruct and reconstruct the Catch-All rule last night.

            16c862f3-89a9-46ee-8f36-0f80c068996d-image.png

            99108e45-e9f2-4abc-989f-0868a9a37545-image.png 95e6c0ee-65d0-4f37-9c14-bf0955cc32f3-image.png

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            And then I tried a different approach...

            c5337edc-4416-4b76-957a-358f249d7efa-image.png 3fb6d0a8-5865-414a-a866-111ce6992831-image.png

            This may be another case of me making things more complicated than they need to be...

            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HASS 2025.11.1
            w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
            MQTTController: 25139
            ZWave Controller: 25139

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G gwp1

              @toggledbits Interesting. Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

              Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

              I'm pretty sure there was more context to that advice. Go find it. Let's have a look.

              @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

              This may be another case of me making things more complicated than they need to be...

              Yeah, not what I would chose.

              Why not something like this:

              1. Make a rule that detects if any of the controlled lights is on (i.e. an OR group when there are multiple devices). I'll call it "Any Light On"
              2. Your "Lights ON" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                • solarRadiation < 14
                • Rule "Any Light On" is FALSE
              3. Your "Lights OFF" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                • solarRadiation >= 14
                • Rule "Any Light On" is TRUE

              The SET reactions for each should be obvious (run your ON or OFF reaction). The RESET reactions should be (completely) empty.

              The "sustained for 300 seconds" will provide 5 minutes of hysteresis:

              • Once it gets dark enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with no lights on, it will turn the lights on;
              • Once it gets light enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with lights on, it will turn them off;
              • If it's dark and the lights are turned off, they will turn back on in 5 minutes. If you want that faster, reduce the sustain period on "Lights ON"
              • If it's light and the lights are turned on, they will stay on for 5 minutes, then get turned off. Adjust "Lights OFF" sustain to suit.

              This is pretty much exactly how my kitchen undercabinet strips are controlled (motion sensing and house mode are also part of it, but not applicable here).

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

                Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

                I'm pretty sure there was more context to that advice. Go find it. Let's have a look.

                @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

                This may be another case of me making things more complicated than they need to be...

                Yeah, not what I would chose.

                Why not something like this:

                1. Make a rule that detects if any of the controlled lights is on (i.e. an OR group when there are multiple devices). I'll call it "Any Light On"
                2. Your "Lights ON" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                  • solarRadiation < 14
                  • Rule "Any Light On" is FALSE
                3. Your "Lights OFF" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                  • solarRadiation >= 14
                  • Rule "Any Light On" is TRUE

                The SET reactions for each should be obvious (run your ON or OFF reaction). The RESET reactions should be (completely) empty.

                The "sustained for 300 seconds" will provide 5 minutes of hysteresis:

                • Once it gets dark enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with no lights on, it will turn the lights on;
                • Once it gets light enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with lights on, it will turn them off;
                • If it's dark and the lights are turned off, they will turn back on in 5 minutes. If you want that faster, reduce the sustain period on "Lights ON"
                • If it's light and the lights are turned on, they will stay on for 5 minutes, then get turned off. Adjust "Lights OFF" sustain to suit.

                This is pretty much exactly how my kitchen undercabinet strips are controlled (motion sensing and house mode are also part of it, but not applicable here).

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gwp1
                wrote on last edited by gwp1
                #7

                @toggledbits sorry for the delay, day job has a rude habit of interfering in fun.

                This solution worked perfectly for this need. It's actually quite similar to how I control the outdoor garden fountain, HVAC, and some other things. As usual, I tried to over-complicate things.

                EDIT: in fact, I find I am using this EXACT method for my outdoor LIFX lights. sigh

                I am still looking for that context. Will provide when I locate it.

                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                *HASS 2025.11.1
                w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                MQTTController: 25139
                ZWave Controller: 25139

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                Recent Topics

                • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                  akbooerA
                  akbooer
                  1
                  2
                  27

                • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                  CrilleC
                  Crille
                  0
                  6
                  39

                • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  0
                  9
                  86

                • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  17
                  171

                • Shelly Wall Display XL
                  akbooerA
                  akbooer
                  2
                  9
                  632

                • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  26
                  261

                • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                  CrilleC
                  Crille
                  0
                  12
                  298

                • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  5
                  126
                  72.0k

                • No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  2
                  66

                • Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  2
                  96

                • Do you Matter?
                  akbooerA
                  akbooer
                  0
                  5
                  380

                • [Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  95
                  9.5k
                Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Unsolved