Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Catch-all lights rule
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Catch-all lights rule

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
7 Posts 2 Posters 1.0k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1

    Background: this is a Windows MSR install I've done for our local pool/amenity center just to run some fans and lights (not my daily driver at home). Install went perfectly fine.

    Scenario: I want the lights to go on when it's dark enough (even if during a storm, not just after sunset) so I'm using solarRadiation from my weather station to drive that Trigger. Easy stuff.

    Issue: sometimes, someone goes in the office and just starts flipping switches and the result can be lights turned on in the daytime or off at night. I'm trying to create a "catch-all" wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF.

    I have the following Reaction built:

    b30eab5b-5a14-4a3a-8c9a-47e3e7e53dc3-image.png

    I also have this Reaction for opposite, ie the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on:

    5c6946b1-297c-4eb1-9618-74820979df29-image.png

    Here are my two rules:

    288cba86-f941-4157-86d9-d8e7487905f7-image.png *NOTE that in my manual testing, ie I turn on the light switch at the incorrect time, when the solarRadiation level changes the Lights ON rule flags and shows as SET. On the next change of solarRadiation it goes back to reset again.

    My expectation is that Lights OFF rule should see the lights are on, the solarRadiation is above the set limit, and turn them off. Instead, every other run, the ON rule moves to SET and then reset again on the following run.

    Logs appear angry:

    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.696Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<RESET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.712Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<RESET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.713Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<RESET> all actions completed.
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.565Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#3" closed, code=1001, reason=
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.753Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.754Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.790Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.839Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#6" authorized
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:43.353Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:43.353Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.146Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#6" closed, code=1001, reason=
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.308Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.309Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.346Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.390Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#7" authorized
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:49.412Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:49.413Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.734Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#7" closed, code=1001, reason=
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.891Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.892Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.925Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.965Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#8" authorized
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:54.383Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:54.384Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:01.590Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.646Z <Rule:INFO> Lights OFF (rule-m6e33ja3 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.656Z <Rule:INFO> Lights ON (rule-m6e4ajh7 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.663Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights OFF<SET>" (rule-m6e33ja3:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.665Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<SET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.668Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights OFF<SET> (rule-m6e33ja3:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.669Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<SET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.669Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<SET> all actions completed.
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.675Z <Rule:INFO> Lights OFF (rule-m6e33ja3 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.680Z <Engine:NOTICE> ReactionHistory: no entry for
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.683Z <Engine:NOTICE> [Engine]Engine#1 entry 256 reaction rule-m6e33ja3:S-1q2f1j0p: [Error] terminated [parent terminating]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.683Z <Engine:CRIT> Error: terminated [parent terminating]
    Error: terminated
        at Engine._process_reaction_queue (C:\Users\Jalan\msr\reactor\server\lib\Engine.js:1644:47)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.699Z <Engine:NOTICE> [Engine]Engine#1 entry 254 reaction rule-m6e33ja3:S: [Error] terminated [preempted by rule state change]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.699Z <Engine:CRIT> Error: terminated [preempted by rule state change]
    Error: terminated
        at Engine._process_reaction_queue (C:\Users\Jalan\msr\reactor\server\lib\Engine.js:1644:47)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.700Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights OFF<RESET>" (rule-m6e33ja3:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.704Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights OFF<RESET> (rule-m6e33ja3:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.705Z <Engine:INFO> Lights OFF<RESET> all actions completed.
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.822Z <Rule:INFO> Lights ON (rule-m6e4ajh7 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.831Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<RESET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.847Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<RESET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.847Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<RESET> all actions completed.
    

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HAOS
    Core 2026.1.1
    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
    FW: v1.1
    SDK: v7.23.1

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      You're not showing your RESET reactions for either rule.

      Edit: by the way, neither rule is looking at the lights, so when you say things like "the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on" and "wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF", you're not showing anything that literally does that. It would only happen by accident if/when solarRadiation changes, because that's the only thing you are looking at.

      Logs aren't angry at all. One message is missing a piece of data, but other than that, this looks as expected. Are you forgetting that the changes operator with no terminal values is just a pulse? So the rule(s) would be expected to set and reset very quickly, which it appears they are doing. It also appears that at least the "Lights OFF" rule has something in the reset reaction, so when the rule resets, the running set reaction will be stopped before it finishes (or maybe even before it starts), and the reset will be run. That's documented behavior. If you don't want your set reaction to be pre-empted, your reset reaction has to be completely empty, not even a comment.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      G 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        You're not showing your RESET reactions for either rule.

        Edit: by the way, neither rule is looking at the lights, so when you say things like "the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on" and "wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF", you're not showing anything that literally does that. It would only happen by accident if/when solarRadiation changes, because that's the only thing you are looking at.

        Logs aren't angry at all. One message is missing a piece of data, but other than that, this looks as expected. Are you forgetting that the changes operator with no terminal values is just a pulse? So the rule(s) would be expected to set and reset very quickly, which it appears they are doing. It also appears that at least the "Lights OFF" rule has something in the reset reaction, so when the rule resets, the running set reaction will be stopped before it finishes (or maybe even before it starts), and the reset will be run. That's documented behavior. If you don't want your set reaction to be pre-empted, your reset reaction has to be completely empty, not even a comment.

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits Interesting. Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HAOS
        Core 2026.1.1
        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
        FW: v1.1
        SDK: v7.23.1

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          You're not showing your RESET reactions for either rule.

          Edit: by the way, neither rule is looking at the lights, so when you say things like "the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on" and "wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF", you're not showing anything that literally does that. It would only happen by accident if/when solarRadiation changes, because that's the only thing you are looking at.

          Logs aren't angry at all. One message is missing a piece of data, but other than that, this looks as expected. Are you forgetting that the changes operator with no terminal values is just a pulse? So the rule(s) would be expected to set and reset very quickly, which it appears they are doing. It also appears that at least the "Lights OFF" rule has something in the reset reaction, so when the rule resets, the running set reaction will be stopped before it finishes (or maybe even before it starts), and the reset will be run. That's documented behavior. If you don't want your set reaction to be pre-empted, your reset reaction has to be completely empty, not even a comment.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @toggledbits I did, however, deconstruct and reconstruct the Catch-All rule last night.

          16c862f3-89a9-46ee-8f36-0f80c068996d-image.png

          99108e45-e9f2-4abc-989f-0868a9a37545-image.png 95e6c0ee-65d0-4f37-9c14-bf0955cc32f3-image.png

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HAOS
          Core 2026.1.1
          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
          FW: v1.1
          SDK: v7.23.1

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G gwp1

            @toggledbits I did, however, deconstruct and reconstruct the Catch-All rule last night.

            16c862f3-89a9-46ee-8f36-0f80c068996d-image.png

            99108e45-e9f2-4abc-989f-0868a9a37545-image.png 95e6c0ee-65d0-4f37-9c14-bf0955cc32f3-image.png

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            And then I tried a different approach...

            c5337edc-4416-4b76-957a-358f249d7efa-image.png 3fb6d0a8-5865-414a-a866-111ce6992831-image.png

            This may be another case of me making things more complicated than they need to be...

            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HAOS
            Core 2026.1.1
            w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
            FW: v1.1
            SDK: v7.23.1

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
            MQTTController: 25139
            ZWave Controller: 25139

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G gwp1

              @toggledbits Interesting. Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

              Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

              I'm pretty sure there was more context to that advice. Go find it. Let's have a look.

              @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

              This may be another case of me making things more complicated than they need to be...

              Yeah, not what I would chose.

              Why not something like this:

              1. Make a rule that detects if any of the controlled lights is on (i.e. an OR group when there are multiple devices). I'll call it "Any Light On"
              2. Your "Lights ON" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                • solarRadiation < 14
                • Rule "Any Light On" is FALSE
              3. Your "Lights OFF" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                • solarRadiation >= 14
                • Rule "Any Light On" is TRUE

              The SET reactions for each should be obvious (run your ON or OFF reaction). The RESET reactions should be (completely) empty.

              The "sustained for 300 seconds" will provide 5 minutes of hysteresis:

              • Once it gets dark enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with no lights on, it will turn the lights on;
              • Once it gets light enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with lights on, it will turn them off;
              • If it's dark and the lights are turned off, they will turn back on in 5 minutes. If you want that faster, reduce the sustain period on "Lights ON"
              • If it's light and the lights are turned on, they will stay on for 5 minutes, then get turned off. Adjust "Lights OFF" sustain to suit.

              This is pretty much exactly how my kitchen undercabinet strips are controlled (motion sensing and house mode are also part of it, but not applicable here).

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

                Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

                I'm pretty sure there was more context to that advice. Go find it. Let's have a look.

                @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

                This may be another case of me making things more complicated than they need to be...

                Yeah, not what I would chose.

                Why not something like this:

                1. Make a rule that detects if any of the controlled lights is on (i.e. an OR group when there are multiple devices). I'll call it "Any Light On"
                2. Your "Lights ON" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                  • solarRadiation < 14
                  • Rule "Any Light On" is FALSE
                3. Your "Lights OFF" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                  • solarRadiation >= 14
                  • Rule "Any Light On" is TRUE

                The SET reactions for each should be obvious (run your ON or OFF reaction). The RESET reactions should be (completely) empty.

                The "sustained for 300 seconds" will provide 5 minutes of hysteresis:

                • Once it gets dark enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with no lights on, it will turn the lights on;
                • Once it gets light enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with lights on, it will turn them off;
                • If it's dark and the lights are turned off, they will turn back on in 5 minutes. If you want that faster, reduce the sustain period on "Lights ON"
                • If it's light and the lights are turned on, they will stay on for 5 minutes, then get turned off. Adjust "Lights OFF" sustain to suit.

                This is pretty much exactly how my kitchen undercabinet strips are controlled (motion sensing and house mode are also part of it, but not applicable here).

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gwp1
                wrote on last edited by gwp1
                #7

                @toggledbits sorry for the delay, day job has a rude habit of interfering in fun.

                This solution worked perfectly for this need. It's actually quite similar to how I control the outdoor garden fountain, HVAC, and some other things. As usual, I tried to over-complicate things.

                EDIT: in fact, I find I am using this EXACT method for my outdoor LIFX lights. sigh

                I am still looking for that context. Will provide when I locate it.

                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                *HAOS
                Core 2026.1.1
                w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                FW: v1.1
                SDK: v7.23.1

                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                MQTTController: 25139
                ZWave Controller: 25139

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                Recent Topics

                • HA and AI
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  0
                  1
                  41

                • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  0
                  6
                  120

                • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  2
                  99

                • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                  S
                  SweetGenius
                  1
                  1
                  71

                • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  3
                  1
                  63

                • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                  G
                  gwp1
                  0
                  1
                  78

                • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                  CrilleC
                  Crille
                  0
                  4
                  162

                • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                  therealdbT
                  therealdb
                  0
                  3
                  150

                • Possible feature request 2?
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  0
                  3
                  130

                • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  5
                  133
                  82.4k

                • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  1
                  9
                  428

                • Copying a global reaction
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  3
                  148
                Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Unsolved