Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Catch-all lights rule
[MSR] Native fan capabilty
therealdbT
Nothing more to add. I see we have hvac_blower, but, anyway, maybe a native fan on the same assumptions of the fan from HASS could be reasonable. I have a couple of them. ie, this is from ESPHome via HASS. x_hass.domain="fan" x_hass.entity_id="fan.kitchen_seashell_hood_ventilation_fan" x_hass.floor_id=null x_hass.services=["fan","esphome"] x_hass.source="esphome" x_hass.state="off" x_hass_attr.friendly_name="Seashell Hood Ventilation Fan" x_hass_attr.percentage=50 x_hass_attr.percentage_step=25 x_hass_attr.preset_mode="" x_hass_attr.preset_modes=[] x_hass_attr.supported_features=49 Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Rule do not fire
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Catch-all lights rule

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
7 Posts 2 Posters 2.2k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1

    Background: this is a Windows MSR install I've done for our local pool/amenity center just to run some fans and lights (not my daily driver at home). Install went perfectly fine.

    Scenario: I want the lights to go on when it's dark enough (even if during a storm, not just after sunset) so I'm using solarRadiation from my weather station to drive that Trigger. Easy stuff.

    Issue: sometimes, someone goes in the office and just starts flipping switches and the result can be lights turned on in the daytime or off at night. I'm trying to create a "catch-all" wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF.

    I have the following Reaction built:

    b30eab5b-5a14-4a3a-8c9a-47e3e7e53dc3-image.png

    I also have this Reaction for opposite, ie the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on:

    5c6946b1-297c-4eb1-9618-74820979df29-image.png

    Here are my two rules:

    288cba86-f941-4157-86d9-d8e7487905f7-image.png *NOTE that in my manual testing, ie I turn on the light switch at the incorrect time, when the solarRadiation level changes the Lights ON rule flags and shows as SET. On the next change of solarRadiation it goes back to reset again.

    My expectation is that Lights OFF rule should see the lights are on, the solarRadiation is above the set limit, and turn them off. Instead, every other run, the ON rule moves to SET and then reset again on the following run.

    Logs appear angry:

    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.696Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<RESET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.712Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<RESET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.713Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<RESET> all actions completed.
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.565Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#3" closed, code=1001, reason=
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.753Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.754Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.790Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.839Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#6" authorized
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:43.353Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:43.353Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.146Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#6" closed, code=1001, reason=
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.308Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.309Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.346Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.390Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#7" authorized
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:49.412Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:49.413Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.734Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#7" closed, code=1001, reason=
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.891Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.892Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.925Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.965Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#8" authorized
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:54.383Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:54.384Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:01.590Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" }
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.646Z <Rule:INFO> Lights OFF (rule-m6e33ja3 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.656Z <Rule:INFO> Lights ON (rule-m6e4ajh7 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.663Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights OFF<SET>" (rule-m6e33ja3:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.665Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<SET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.668Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights OFF<SET> (rule-m6e33ja3:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.669Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<SET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:S)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.669Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<SET> all actions completed.
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.675Z <Rule:INFO> Lights OFF (rule-m6e33ja3 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.680Z <Engine:NOTICE> ReactionHistory: no entry for
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.683Z <Engine:NOTICE> [Engine]Engine#1 entry 256 reaction rule-m6e33ja3:S-1q2f1j0p: [Error] terminated [parent terminating]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.683Z <Engine:CRIT> Error: terminated [parent terminating]
    Error: terminated
        at Engine._process_reaction_queue (C:\Users\Jalan\msr\reactor\server\lib\Engine.js:1644:47)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.699Z <Engine:NOTICE> [Engine]Engine#1 entry 254 reaction rule-m6e33ja3:S: [Error] terminated [preempted by rule state change]
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.699Z <Engine:CRIT> Error: terminated [preempted by rule state change]
    Error: terminated
        at Engine._process_reaction_queue (C:\Users\Jalan\msr\reactor\server\lib\Engine.js:1644:47)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.700Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights OFF<RESET>" (rule-m6e33ja3:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.704Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights OFF<RESET> (rule-m6e33ja3:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.705Z <Engine:INFO> Lights OFF<RESET> all actions completed.
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.822Z <Rule:INFO> Lights ON (rule-m6e4ajh7 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET!
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.831Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<RESET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.847Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<RESET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:R)
    [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.847Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<RESET> all actions completed.
    

    *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HAOS
    Core 2026.7.4
    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
    FW: v1.1
    SDK: v7.23.1

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Online
      toggledbitsT Online
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      You're not showing your RESET reactions for either rule.

      Edit: by the way, neither rule is looking at the lights, so when you say things like "the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on" and "wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF", you're not showing anything that literally does that. It would only happen by accident if/when solarRadiation changes, because that's the only thing you are looking at.

      Logs aren't angry at all. One message is missing a piece of data, but other than that, this looks as expected. Are you forgetting that the changes operator with no terminal values is just a pulse? So the rule(s) would be expected to set and reset very quickly, which it appears they are doing. It also appears that at least the "Lights OFF" rule has something in the reset reaction, so when the rule resets, the running set reaction will be stopped before it finishes (or maybe even before it starts), and the reset will be run. That's documented behavior. If you don't want your set reaction to be pre-empted, your reset reaction has to be completely empty, not even a comment.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      G 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        You're not showing your RESET reactions for either rule.

        Edit: by the way, neither rule is looking at the lights, so when you say things like "the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on" and "wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF", you're not showing anything that literally does that. It would only happen by accident if/when solarRadiation changes, because that's the only thing you are looking at.

        Logs aren't angry at all. One message is missing a piece of data, but other than that, this looks as expected. Are you forgetting that the changes operator with no terminal values is just a pulse? So the rule(s) would be expected to set and reset very quickly, which it appears they are doing. It also appears that at least the "Lights OFF" rule has something in the reset reaction, so when the rule resets, the running set reaction will be stopped before it finishes (or maybe even before it starts), and the reset will be run. That's documented behavior. If you don't want your set reaction to be pre-empted, your reset reaction has to be completely empty, not even a comment.

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits Interesting. Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

        *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HAOS
        Core 2026.7.4
        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
        FW: v1.1
        SDK: v7.23.1

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          You're not showing your RESET reactions for either rule.

          Edit: by the way, neither rule is looking at the lights, so when you say things like "the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on" and "wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF", you're not showing anything that literally does that. It would only happen by accident if/when solarRadiation changes, because that's the only thing you are looking at.

          Logs aren't angry at all. One message is missing a piece of data, but other than that, this looks as expected. Are you forgetting that the changes operator with no terminal values is just a pulse? So the rule(s) would be expected to set and reset very quickly, which it appears they are doing. It also appears that at least the "Lights OFF" rule has something in the reset reaction, so when the rule resets, the running set reaction will be stopped before it finishes (or maybe even before it starts), and the reset will be run. That's documented behavior. If you don't want your set reaction to be pre-empted, your reset reaction has to be completely empty, not even a comment.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @toggledbits I did, however, deconstruct and reconstruct the Catch-All rule last night.

          16c862f3-89a9-46ee-8f36-0f80c068996d-image.png

          99108e45-e9f2-4abc-989f-0868a9a37545-image.png 95e6c0ee-65d0-4f37-9c14-bf0955cc32f3-image.png

          *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HAOS
          Core 2026.7.4
          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
          FW: v1.1
          SDK: v7.23.1

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G gwp1

            @toggledbits I did, however, deconstruct and reconstruct the Catch-All rule last night.

            16c862f3-89a9-46ee-8f36-0f80c068996d-image.png

            99108e45-e9f2-4abc-989f-0868a9a37545-image.png 95e6c0ee-65d0-4f37-9c14-bf0955cc32f3-image.png

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            And then I tried a different approach...

            c5337edc-4416-4b76-957a-358f249d7efa-image.png 3fb6d0a8-5865-414a-a866-111ce6992831-image.png

            This may be another case of me making things more complicated than they need to be...

            *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HAOS
            Core 2026.7.4
            w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
            FW: v1.1
            SDK: v7.23.1

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
            MQTTController: 25139
            ZWave Controller: 25139

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G gwp1

              @toggledbits Interesting. Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

              toggledbitsT Online
              toggledbitsT Online
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

              Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

              I'm pretty sure there was more context to that advice. Go find it. Let's have a look.

              @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

              This may be another case of me making things more complicated than they need to be...

              Yeah, not what I would chose.

              Why not something like this:

              1. Make a rule that detects if any of the controlled lights is on (i.e. an OR group when there are multiple devices). I'll call it "Any Light On"
              2. Your "Lights ON" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                • solarRadiation < 14
                • Rule "Any Light On" is FALSE
              3. Your "Lights OFF" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                • solarRadiation >= 14
                • Rule "Any Light On" is TRUE

              The SET reactions for each should be obvious (run your ON or OFF reaction). The RESET reactions should be (completely) empty.

              The "sustained for 300 seconds" will provide 5 minutes of hysteresis:

              • Once it gets dark enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with no lights on, it will turn the lights on;
              • Once it gets light enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with lights on, it will turn them off;
              • If it's dark and the lights are turned off, they will turn back on in 5 minutes. If you want that faster, reduce the sustain period on "Lights ON"
              • If it's light and the lights are turned on, they will stay on for 5 minutes, then get turned off. Adjust "Lights OFF" sustain to suit.

              This is pretty much exactly how my kitchen undercabinet strips are controlled (motion sensing and house mode are also part of it, but not applicable here).

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

                Once upon a time you told me to add even a random comment as a placeholder for reset reaction if I had no actually reset action. That's what is in each of these.

                I'm pretty sure there was more context to that advice. Go find it. Let's have a look.

                @gwp1 said in Catch-all lights rule:

                This may be another case of me making things more complicated than they need to be...

                Yeah, not what I would chose.

                Why not something like this:

                1. Make a rule that detects if any of the controlled lights is on (i.e. an OR group when there are multiple devices). I'll call it "Any Light On"
                2. Your "Lights ON" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                  • solarRadiation < 14
                  • Rule "Any Light On" is FALSE
                3. Your "Lights OFF" rule is (AND group, with sustained for 300 seconds option):
                  • solarRadiation >= 14
                  • Rule "Any Light On" is TRUE

                The SET reactions for each should be obvious (run your ON or OFF reaction). The RESET reactions should be (completely) empty.

                The "sustained for 300 seconds" will provide 5 minutes of hysteresis:

                • Once it gets dark enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with no lights on, it will turn the lights on;
                • Once it gets light enough and has been that way for 5 minutes with lights on, it will turn them off;
                • If it's dark and the lights are turned off, they will turn back on in 5 minutes. If you want that faster, reduce the sustain period on "Lights ON"
                • If it's light and the lights are turned on, they will stay on for 5 minutes, then get turned off. Adjust "Lights OFF" sustain to suit.

                This is pretty much exactly how my kitchen undercabinet strips are controlled (motion sensing and house mode are also part of it, but not applicable here).

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gwp1
                wrote on last edited by gwp1
                #7

                @toggledbits sorry for the delay, day job has a rude habit of interfering in fun.

                This solution worked perfectly for this need. It's actually quite similar to how I control the outdoor garden fountain, HVAC, and some other things. As usual, I tried to over-complicate things.

                EDIT: in fact, I find I am using this EXACT method for my outdoor LIFX lights. sigh

                I am still looking for that context. Will provide when I locate it.

                *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                *HAOS
                Core 2026.7.4
                w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                FW: v1.1
                SDK: v7.23.1

                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
                MQTTController: 25139
                ZWave Controller: 25139

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                Recent Topics

                • [MSR] Native fan capabilty
                  therealdbT
                  therealdb
                  1
                  1
                  23

                • [MSR] Rule do not fire
                  therealdbT
                  therealdb
                  0
                  4
                  78

                • Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
                  N
                  noelab
                  0
                  8
                  166

                • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  1
                  9
                  293

                • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  5
                  149
                  137.9k

                • Unofficial thread for compatibility
                  tunnusT
                  tunnus
                  2
                  2
                  733

                • Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  2
                  87

                • Bail out of failed reaction?
                  T
                  tamorgen
                  0
                  3
                  136

                • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                  T
                  tamorgen
                  0
                  7
                  366

                • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                  CrilleC
                  Crille
                  0
                  5
                  260

                • Upgrade Issues
                  T
                  tbully
                  0
                  9
                  395

                • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  10
                  507
                Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Unsolved