Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Using Google Forms to Store Data from MSR
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Using Google Forms to Store Data from MSR

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
2 Posts 1 Posters 672 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LibraSunL Offline
    LibraSunL Offline
    LibraSun
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Inspired by a YouTube video entitled "Post HTML Form Data to Google Spreadsheet", I wanted to create a brief tutorial on how to send data directly from Multi-System Reactor (MSR) to your own spreadsheet.

    This method is very straightforward, not too challenging to set up, involves no programming skill, and avoids installing a purpose-built database like MongoDB or subscribing to paid services like IFTTT or Apilio (both of which offer "Variables" stored in the cloud.)

    Furthermore, this setup leverages the inherent power of Google Sheets' formulas, email notifications, graphing and other features, enabling you to produce presentation-ready charts and reports summarizing your home automation processes.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • LibraSunL Offline
      LibraSunL Offline
      LibraSun
      wrote on last edited by LibraSun
      #2

      STEP 1: Create the Form

      • Visit drive.google.com and click NEW > Form
      • Give your Form a title and populate it with one or more "Questions" of type "Short Answer".
      • I will refer to the question titles as Field A, FIeld B, etc. for brevity, but you can modify them to suit your purposes.
      • Click SETTINGS and choose "Save Responses to > New Spreadsheet" (it will be automatically created in Drive)
      • Optional: Turn on email notifications for each SUBMIT

      STEP 2: Generate the GET URL

      • Click Preview ('eye' icon) to open completed live Form
      • Copy-and-paste (into a text editor, like Notepad) the Form URL (ends with /viewform)
      • Press F12 (in Chrome) and click Network pane
      • Fill out Form with sample data and click SUBMIT
      • Click formResponse in left column of Network pane
      • With Headers highlighted, scroll down to FORM DATA
      • Copy (into text editor) each field name of the form entry.1234567 in order
      • Replace the /viewform in Form URL with /formResponse
        NOTE: This will serve as your GET base URL in Step 3.

      STEP 3: Prepare a Rule in MSR

      • Create or Edit a Rule in MSR
      • Add new blank Expressions of the form fieldA, fieldB, etc., one for each question appearing on your Form.
      • Add the Expression getURL and paste in the modified URL from Step 2, surrounded by double quotes.
      • Add the Expression getData and type the following formula: "?entry.1234567=" + fieldA + "&entry.7654321=" + fieldB (continuing as needed for all X fields)

      STEP 4: Send your data

      • Add to Set Reaction as many [Set Variable] actions as needed to store future values in fieldA, fieldB, etc. (and/or pre-populate some Expressions with numbers or text now).
      • Add an [HTTP Request] action in Set Reaction.
      • Populate its "Request URL" field with ${{ getURL + getData }}
      • SAVE and EXIT
      • When triggered, the Rule will invisibly post the current field values to a new row of the assigned spreadsheet, using the Google Form.

      STEP 5: Review your data

      • To view the stored values, simply open the receiving Spreadsheet and examine its FormResponses tab.
      • Columns will be named Timestamp, Field A, Field B, etc.
      • The timestamps in column A reflect when MSR posted data.
      • You can easily use this data to generate graphs, add columns to calculate complex formulae, export as a .CSV file, etc.

      Enjoy! I may one day (in the distant future) post a follow-up tutorial on extracting values from Google Sheets for use in MSR. For now, I hope this serves as a fun, makeshift and FREE database for storing your important data directly from MSR.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      Recent Topics

      • Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
        N
        noelab
        0
        8
        78

      • DynamicGroupController and attributes
        toggledbitsT
        toggledbits
        1
        9
        253

      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
        toggledbitsT
        toggledbits
        5
        149
        135.7k

      • Unofficial thread for compatibility
        tunnusT
        tunnus
        2
        2
        715

      • Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
        toggledbitsT
        toggledbits
        0
        2
        65

      • Bail out of failed reaction?
        T
        tamorgen
        0
        3
        110

      • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
        T
        tamorgen
        0
        7
        335

      • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
        CrilleC
        Crille
        0
        5
        243

      • Upgrade Issues
        T
        tbully
        0
        9
        358

      • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
        toggledbitsT
        toggledbits
        0
        10
        474

      • [SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
        G
        gwp1
        0
        5
        235

      • openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
        A
        a-lurker
        0
        2
        253
      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Unsolved