Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Stumbling toward a working MSR...
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Stumbling toward a working MSR...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
13 Posts 2 Posters 1.8k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Tom_DT Offline
    Tom_DT Offline
    Tom_D
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I have some experience with Linux from about 30 years ago and my first thought was to install MSR in a QNAP TS-251+ Debian container. That did not go well as at every step it seemed I needed to add components to the OS to move forward one step. I got so frustrated I ordered a RPi which comes tomorrow. I have tried a few container Linux versions and gotten the furthest with CentOS.
    MSR is running but complains about the system time being different from the MSR time. MSR is at my correct local time but the container OS is not. All the searching says that datetimectl is the program to run but I get an error about file or folder being incorrect. As long as MSR is at the correct time is that enough?

    latest-25082-3c348de6

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Trying to decode... did you not just use the pre-built generic amd64 container? You probably should not be building an OS container and then trying to run Reactor within it.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Tom_DT Offline
        Tom_DT Offline
        Tom_D
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        There is an import button with the QNAP Container Station but it only imports from the NAS or the local computer and I could not figure out how to get the toggledbits/reactor:latest-generic-amd64 file to my local computer so I tried the Bare-Metal build on containers running various Linux versions.

        latest-25082-3c348de6

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          I'm not a QNAP user/owner but from what I was able to see in some searching, where you search for packages in Container Station (at Create Container), if you do a search for "Reactor" it should give you a list of QNAP-recommended results, which will be nothing of course because they nothing about MSR, but there should be a "Docker Hub" tab you can click, and it should be listed there as toggledbits/reactor.

          Ref: https://youtu.be/yblN8XabE1M?t=201 (watch from marked start to 3:57)

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #5

            After that, your next challenge is to get all the container settings right. For the container to work, it needs:

            1. Network operating mode
            2. Environment variables
            3. Volumes mounted

            Working from the Create Container dialog, leave Auto Start on and most of the other defaults; it doesn't appear like anything needs to be changed (we'll find out if that's right or not)... click Advanced Settings to get to the good stuff.

            In Advanced Settings, go to Network and select "Bridge" "Host".

            On the Environment tab, you will need to set TZ to your timezone, selecting from this list (try not to use the red ones). You may find some other environment variables already set up (e.g. REACTOR_HOME=/opt/reactor, REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX=/var/reactor) -- DO NOT change these (ever). The only one you should set/change is TZ.

            On the Shared Folder tab, you will need to map the container's /var/reactor directory to a subdirectory on the NAS (which you must create) to store MSR's configuration and data files. So the "Volume from host" is the directory you create, and the "Mount Point" must be exactly /var/reactor, and both read and write must be enabled.

            You should then be able to start the container. You should immediately observe that the directory you created for config and data is populated with some folders and files. You should then be able to access the UI by going to http://assigned-ip-address:8111/

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • Tom_DT Offline
              Tom_DT Offline
              Tom_D
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              It is a good thing containers don't cost anything.
              I tried TZ=-800 and TZ=America/Los_Angeles and neither worked so I checked the QNAP box time and it was off by a bit and not updating so I fixed that and the Reactor status error is gone.
              The network setting for the container is Host. NAT and Bridge did not work.
              The top file share line did not work but the second one did.
              All seems to be working now so I can start learning MSR.
              Thanks for the help.

              latest-25082-3c348de6

              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Tom_DT Tom_D

                It is a good thing containers don't cost anything.
                I tried TZ=-800 and TZ=America/Los_Angeles and neither worked so I checked the QNAP box time and it was off by a bit and not updating so I fixed that and the Reactor status error is gone.
                The network setting for the container is Host. NAT and Bridge did not work.
                The top file share line did not work but the second one did.
                All seems to be working now so I can start learning MSR.
                Thanks for the help.

                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                #7

                @tom_d said in Stumbling toward a working MSR...:

                The top file share line did not work but the second one did.

                Not sure what you mean here. I think you are seeing things that I cannot (no QNAP, just working from docs and YT vids).

                Can you screen shot and post all of your "Advanced Settings"? I'll use that info to update the docs.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                Tom_DT 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  @tom_d said in Stumbling toward a working MSR...:

                  The top file share line did not work but the second one did.

                  Not sure what you mean here. I think you are seeing things that I cannot (no QNAP, just working from docs and YT vids).

                  Can you screen shot and post all of your "Advanced Settings"? I'll use that info to update the docs.

                  Tom_DT Offline
                  Tom_DT Offline
                  Tom_D
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @toggledbits
                  2-Reactor  Pick the correct reactor.png 3-amd64  Get this version.png 4-noliability.png 1-Create Search for reactor.png 2-Reactor  Pick the correct reactor.png 3-amd64  Get this version.png 4-noliability.png Step1-Create shared folder.png

                  latest-25082-3c348de6

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @tom_d said in Stumbling toward a working MSR...:

                    The top file share line did not work but the second one did.

                    Not sure what you mean here. I think you are seeing things that I cannot (no QNAP, just working from docs and YT vids).

                    Can you screen shot and post all of your "Advanced Settings"? I'll use that info to update the docs.

                    Tom_DT Offline
                    Tom_DT Offline
                    Tom_D
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @toggledbits 5b-create  Select Advanced settings before hitting create.png 6-ENV Add TZ.png 7-Device No changes..png 5a-create  Select Advanced settings before hitting create.png 5b-create  Select Advanced settings before hitting create.png 6-ENV Add TZ.png 7-Device No changes..png 8-Share  Create shared folder before starting container creation.  See Step1.png

                    latest-25082-3c348de6

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      @tom_d said in Stumbling toward a working MSR...:

                      The top file share line did not work but the second one did.

                      Not sure what you mean here. I think you are seeing things that I cannot (no QNAP, just working from docs and YT vids).

                      Can you screen shot and post all of your "Advanced Settings"? I'll use that info to update the docs.

                      Tom_DT Offline
                      Tom_DT Offline
                      Tom_D
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @toggledbits OK. I think all the images are here. They are numbered with comments as part of the names. I can send you a zip file if that helps at all.
                      10-Summary - hit OK.png 11-Overview.png 9-Share  hit the create button.png 10-Summary - hit OK.png 11-Overview.png 12-container.png

                      latest-25082-3c348de6

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Tom_DT Offline
                        Tom_DT Offline
                        Tom_D
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Updating MSR in a QNAP container is a bit of a process. The container needs to be stopped and then the image deleted in GUI. Create a new container will all the same settings as the original and you should get the new image.

                        latest-25082-3c348de6

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                          #12

                          Yes, seems to be a limitation of the QNAP GUI. On Synology, for example, one can re-download the image, "clear" the existing container, and then restart it, and the container starts from the updated image. The QNAP limitation seems to be widely discussed (lots of search results), but little in terms of solutions other than what you are doing. There is one reference I found to the GUI creating a docker-compose file in a special location on the NAS, which would theoretically make it possible to do command line update using docker pull and some other (unknown) commands, but not having a QNAP NAS, it's not something I can dig into. A later part of the discussion suggested this compose file is no longer created/used, but again, I can't verify any of that.

                          Ref: https://github.com/qnap-dev/container-apps/issues/53

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Tom_DT Offline
                            Tom_DT Offline
                            Tom_D
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Once you have been through the process a few times it goes pretty fast. I'll get more practice as versions of MSR are released.

                            latest-25082-3c348de6

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            Recent Topics

                            • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              2
                              29

                            • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                              S
                              SweetGenius
                              1
                              1
                              24

                            • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              2
                              1
                              25

                            • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                              G
                              gwp1
                              0
                              1
                              55

                            • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                              CrilleC
                              Crille
                              0
                              4
                              73

                            • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                              therealdbT
                              therealdb
                              0
                              3
                              92

                            • Possible feature request 2?
                              CatmanV2C
                              CatmanV2
                              0
                              3
                              71

                            • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              5
                              133
                              80.0k

                            • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                              CatmanV2C
                              CatmanV2
                              1
                              9
                              379

                            • Copying a global reaction
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              3
                              114

                            • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                              CatmanV2C
                              CatmanV2
                              0
                              9
                              447

                            • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              4
                              165
                            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                            Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Unsolved