The new built fixed the issue. Thanks for the fast response. Much appreciated.
S
Snowman
@Snowman
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC.
Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc.
Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box?
Thanks.
The last of four boards I'm trying in this batch is the Orange Pi 4 LTS. I purchased a 3GB RAM + 16GB eMMC model from Amazon for $83, making it the most costly of the four boards tried, but still well under my US$100 limit.
This board is powered by a Rockchip RK3399-T processor, ARM-compatible with dual Cortex-A72 cores and quad Cortex-A53 cores at 1.6Ghz (1.8Ghz for the 4GB model); compare this to the RPi 3B+ with four Cortex-A53 and the RPi 4B with four Cortex-A72, this board is a hybrid that I would expect to stand in the performance middle between the two RPi models. It's available in 3GB and 4GB DDR4 RAM configurations, with and without 16GB eMMC storage. It has a MicroSDHC slot, gigabit Ethernet, WiFi and BT, two USB 2.0 type A ports, one USB 3.0 type C port, a mini PCIe ribbon-cable connector (requires add-on board for standard connector), two each RPi-compatible camera and LCD ports, HDMI type A, and can be powered (5VDC/3A) via USB-C or DC type C (3.8mm OD/1.1mm ID) jack (center-positive), an odd and perhaps unwelcome departure from the more common type A (5.5mm/2.1mm). A serial port for console/debug can be connected by using a (not included) USB-TTL adapter (3.3V) via pin headers like the Orange Pi Zero 2. The included dual-band antenna connects via U.FL connector to the board, so it's easy substituting for another if you prefer. The manufacturer recommends use of a heat sink (which was included in the box). A metal cooling case is also offered by the manufacturer (a bundle with the metal case and a power supply is sold on Amazon for $90 as of this writing).
The Orange Pi 4 LTS is somewhat longer than the RPi 4B, and although the boards are the same width, the mounting hole placement is different both in length and (oddly) width. Between this and the differences in connector locations, neither board is a drop-in replacecment for the other and their respective cases are not interchangeable. The 26-pin header is a subset of the RPi 4B's 40-pin header, so some HATs for the RPi may work (although the mounting hole differences will make securing them "interesting"), and some HATs will surely not.
Models with eMMC storage have an OS installed and boot immediately with SSH daemon running and ready for login. Mine was running Debian Bullseye, which would probably be fine for most users. It had clearly been on there a while, because it needed a lot of updates, but it's a current distro, so you're running out of the box with something that will last.
A different OS can be installed by downloading an image (once again I chose Ubuntu Jammy) and writing it to a MicroSD card, then booting the system from the SD card. You can either leave the system in that state (running the OS from the SD card), or copy the OS from the SD card to the eMMC. The latter is done by a script; documentation for the process is best described in the downloadable PDF User Manual. This took about 10 minutes and went smoothly, and I was able to boot the system without the SD card after the process completed.
I have lingering questions around the value of the eMMC storage. It's definitely faster than using MicroSD or USB-based storage (I got 311MB/s average on a 4GB write, compared to MicroSD performance around 15MB/s), but it would take a long-term test of this product to determine if the on-board eMMC option has the stamina to take the write counts typical of Linux systems, and if its wear-leveling and error correction are sufficient to assure a long, error-free life. Given the high premium apparently being paid for including eMMC on the board, it should be fast and durable, but only time and experience (perhaps painful) would tell the latter. A careful configuration with other Flash-friendly filesystems could be used to reduce wear, but this is an advanced configuration/cookbook topic and beyond the scope of this writing. This question is also not unique to eMMC — MicroSD cards are also known to fail with high write cycles, so the use of a "high endurance" product is recommended for any and all systems using MicroSD as primary storage. The board has Mini PCIe capability, and that may be a storage alternative, but read on...
Also bear in mind that the eMMC storage is fixed-size forever; it cannot be expanded, and 16GB can run out pretty quickly these days. Users of MicroSD cards for primary storage can upgrade to bigger cards, but when users of eMMC primary storage outgrow it, the only choice is to add a MicroSD card or other "external" storage to the system, move part of the filesystem to it, and then manage both storage devices and deal with the limitations and risks of both.
As I mentioned with the Orange Pi Zero 2, if you are going to use this board as a home automation controller/gateway or similar role, it should (IMO) have a battery-backed real time clock (RTC), and Orange Pi offers an add-on module that connects directly to the 26-pin header on the board. An available expansion board provides a standard Mini PCIe interface and SIM card slot (hmm...), but it connects to the main board via a short ribbon cable, and its mounting holes have no complement on the main board, so it seems like it would be a fragile dangly thing that's a nuisance to deal with.
I want to like this board more, and it's very capable, but I'm concerned about value. The limited options for eMMC (16GB or none), the question mark of the eMMC's longevity vs cost, the strange DC power connector choice, the lack of 40-pin GPIO on a full-size (plus) board, the inconsistent hole placement, and the fragile Mini PCIe arrangement, are all "cons" that devalue this board in my view. The price point is clearly driven by the additional capabilities of the board (camera support, ports, six core CPU, extra RAM, on-board eMMC storage), but unfortunately, a great many of these features may not be useful for home automation, and therefore potentially a waste of money.
In terms of overall value, I still believe the Libre "Le Potato" seems a better choice to me, and the Orange Pi Zero 2 (very) a close second, but I'll admit I'm focused on a particular application and your needs may be better suited to what this board offers than mine.
Passmark Results:
OrangePi 4 LTS
Cortex-A72 (aarch64)
6 cores @ 1200 MHz | 2.9 GiB RAM
Number of Processes: 6 | Test Iterations: 1 | Test Duration: Medium
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Mark: 583
Integer Math 12037 Million Operations/s
Floating Point Math 2542 Million Operations/s
Prime Numbers 4.5 Million Primes/s
Sorting 3141 Thousand Strings/s
Encryption 153 MB/s
Compression 4049 KB/s
CPU Single Threaded 154 Million Operations/s
Physics 80.5 Frames/s
Extended Instructions (NEON) 244 Million Matrices/s
Memory Mark: 498
Database Operations 551 Thousand Operations/s
Memory Read Cached 2524 MB/s
Memory Read Uncached 2602 MB/s
Memory Write 3182 MB/s
Available RAM 1947 Megabytes
Memory Latency 119 Nanoseconds
Memory Threaded 6243 MB/s
---------------
eMMC storage write 311MB/s average for 4GB; MicroSD (Samsung 32GB class 10) storage write 15MB/s.
With Raspberry Pi boards continuing to be relatively scarce, I've been trying a few alternatives to see what may be usable and good. I had previously written about the Jetson Nano 2GB, which is great, but a little pricey, so I'm trying to find sub-US$100 boards that will run Reactor.
I've got four that I'm trying now, but one in particular goes right to work in the most predictable way and seems worth a mention immediately: the Libre Computer Board AML-S905X-CC 2GB (known as "Le Potato").
The form factor is very similar to that of the Raspberry Pi 3 B+, and has comparable CPU (ARM Cortex-A53, quad 64-bit cores at 1.5+GHz -- slightly higher clock speed). It's US$35 on Amazon and LoverPi in the (recommended) 2GB configuration, and easy to get.
Startup is like RPi: download one of the available OS images (Ubuntu, Raspbian, Debian, ARMbian, etc.) from their site and write the image to a MicroSD card, insert into slot, power up, and off you go. I tried the Ubuntu 22.04 image first and it comes right up. No problem getting nodejs 18.12.1 installed and running (with Reactor).
No WiFi on board, but I don't see that as a minus for use as a controller/hub (which should be hard-wired, IMO). The 40-pin GPIO connector is compatible with typical RPi HATs (PoE, breakouts, etc.).
There is an available eMMC (solid state storage) module to use instead of MicroSD, which I would recommend for long-term use. It runs US$25 for 32GB (64GB and 128GB available). The module is scarcely larger than the chip it carries, and has the smallest board-to-board connector I've ever seen.
Next up: ESPRESSObin 2GB (spoiler: it's... technical...)
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration
This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something?
Cheers
C
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration:
users:
# This section defines your valid users.
admin: *******
groups:
# This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application
# and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to
# more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here.
admin_group:
users:
- admin
applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications
guests:
users: "*"
applications:
- dashboard
api_acls:
# This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API
- url: "/api"
group: admin_group
allow: true
log: true
# This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint
- url: "/api/v1/alive"
allow: true
session:
timeout: 7200 # (seconds)
rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true
# If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged.
log_acls: true
# If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged.
debug_acls: true
My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules.
I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds).
Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off?
With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches.
Thanks
Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7
VirtualEntityController v25356
Synology Docker
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future.
In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level.
Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way.
I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption.
A few other things to know:
If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc.
Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy).
The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON.
You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach).
The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case.
This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change.
This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks.
Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option?
No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices
Cheers
C
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions;
Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating;
Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later;
Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase;
Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions;
Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases);
Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Just for the record, in case anyone is following, I'm really rather impressed.
I have installed one of these:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0B6P22YJC?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title&th=1
That's connected (physically) to the VM running on my Synology, with a 2m USB extension.
The same host also runs Openluup, Mosquito, HA Bridge.
Yesterday I installed Zigbee2mqtt. That was a bit of a PITA but mostly because of ports and permissions.
Once up and running, and the correct boxes ticked, immediately visible in Home Assistant via the MQTT integration, and thence into Reactor
I've only got two devices. I bought the cheapest sensor I could find, which is a door sensor. Dead easy to add to ZIgbee2mqtt and again, immediately visible in HA.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0FPQLWRW1?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title
The dongle is on the top floor of the house, and I wanted the sensor on the back door (just about as far apart as it's possible to get short of going into the garage) When I moved the sensor downstairs it dropped out pretty instantly (which wasn't a huge surprise) so quick bit of research found out that smart plugs will act as routers so...
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0FDQDPGBB?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title
Took me about 30 seconds to connect. Updated the name. Instantly visible in Reactor with the new name pushed over from Zigbee2mqtt.
And lo, the door sensor now has a signal of 140 and works as far as I can tell perfectly and instantly (unlike my z-wave one).
A few more of those will be purchased and used to replace the Tuya wifi cloud devices and the (continually failing) Z-wave plugs (yeah, they were TKB so....)
Commended to the house. Thanks for everyone that got me on the right lines.
C
If you’re like me and still running HABridge to control your devices locally via Alexa, you might need to tweak your endpoints to call Reactor via HTTP. Here’s the best way to do it, IMO:
Insert the Reactor Canonical ID (e.g., zwavejs>71-1) into the MapID field, but make sure it’s URL-encoded like this: zwavejs%3E71-1.
Then, configure these endpoints as needed:
On: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/power_switch.on
Off: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/power_switch.off
Dim:
For lights: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/dimming.set?level=${intensity.decimal_percent}
For roller shutters: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/position.set?value=${intensity.decimal_percent}
Color: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/rgb_color.set_rgb?red=${color.r}&green=${color.g}&blue=${color.b}
Just replace [ReactorIP] with your actual IP address. By using these placeholders, you can standardize your endpoints across all devices, making maintenance easier.
This setup works with any device mapped under MSR, regardless of the controller (ZWaveJS, Vera, HASS, OpenSprinkler, virtual, MQTT, DynamicEntities, etc.). If you need different calls, just go to the entities, get the action and parameters, and adjust accordingly. Enjoy super fast access to your devices via Alexa!
If you're migrating from Vera, the endpoints are (URL-encoded) in a file called device.db, in JSON format, under your config. You'd write a script to align the new endpoints to the new one, if you prefer to do it automatically. YMMV.
Posts
-
Cannot delete Global Expressions -
Cannot delete Global ExpressionsI am trying to delete a global expression (gLightDelay) but for some strange reason, it comes back despite clicking the Delete this expression and Save Changes buttons.
I have not created a global expression for some times and just noticed this while doing some clean-up.
I have upgraded Reactor to 25067 from 25060 and the behaviour is still there. I have restarted Reactor (as well as restarting its container) and cleared the browser's cache several times without success.
Here's what the log shows.
[latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:22.690Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" } [latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:26.254Z <GlobalExpression:NOTICE> Deleting global expression gLightDelay [latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:27.887Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" }Reactor latest-25067-62e21a2d
Docker on Synology NAS -
Button.Since Revisited@toggledbits In the MSR documentation, under Standard Capabilities, I noticed that the
button.since attribute was deprecated as of version 22256 and the metadata is the preferred way to access the last-modified time of an attribute.Am I reading this right? Should I stop using it in my rules?
Thanks
-
[SOLVED]Hass websocket falsely reporting ready on boot??@toggledbits I have a similar issue but I do not have a wait_all_controllers: true in my engine subsection.
I just add it I suppose ? Thanks
This is what I have under engine.
engine: # enabled - whether or not the rules engine runs. Change only when directed. enabled: true # # startup_wait - Time to wait for all controllers to come ready. Reactor often starts faster # than most hubs, so this pause allows Reactor to wait for a tunable time. The # Engine is not started until all controllers are ready or this timeout # expires. See https://smarthome.community/topic/700/start-up startup_wait: 600000 # milliseconds, default 60000 (one minute) # # allow_shell_action - The "Shell Command" reaction action comes with some security risks, so # by default it is disabled. To enable it, set this value true. # allow_shell_action: true # allow_shell_action_substitution: true # # shell_action_timeout - The "Shell Command" action will allow the running command to run for # up to this many milliseconds before it terminates it (to prevent run- # away processes). The default is 30000 (milliseconds, 30 seconds). #shell_action_timeout: 30000 # # monitored_entities - if you can't figure out what is changing an entity, # (not the data, but the physical device, like a light # that is being turned on or off at an unexpected time), # you can add it to this list and the logs will post # a message whenever an action is performed on the # device (no log level changes are needed, the message # is unconditional). # monitored_entities: # - vera>device_XXX -
Reactor-Editor / Reactor-ui-Status Errors@toggledbits Below, the error and a screenshot while creating a new Global Expression, named "test". Hoping this helps answer your questions.
As soon as I am done typing "test" and clicking in the field to add my formula, the error pops-up and will continue popping-up three times by the time it saved the changes. The error will also pop-up when I delete the expression and will pop-up a second time by the time it saved the changes.
It did not happen on the first use of the tab/function. It took a few tries before I could re-produce the error. It does resolve itself after a page refresh.
@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:543:91 makeExprMenu@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:537:28 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:92:64 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:68 each@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:3133 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:35 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:98:44 forEach@[native code] @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:95:54 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:106:44 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/Observable.js:78:28 signalModified@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/ee.js:146:21 signalModified@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:40:29 reindexExpressions@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:71:32 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:608:40 dispatch@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:40040
-
Reactor-Editor / Reactor-ui-Status Errors@toggledbits These errors are on the UI. Not from the logs. They are not preventing me from doing any work.
For example, I'll go to Expressions, click the Add Expression, and when I click the Save Changes button, that is when these errors pop-up.
Same goes with creating or updating a rule.
I'll post a screenshot next time I see one.
I'll try the Clear local storage suggestion and will let you know.
-
Reactor-Editor / Reactor-ui-Status Errors@toggledbits I understand that you do not perform testing on Mac computers but thought I'd share the following with you in case something can be done.
I started seeing these errors with version 24302. I thought that upgrading to 24343 would have fixed the issue but unfortunately not. I either have to close the browser or clear the cache for the errors to stop popping-up but they slowly come back.
I see these errors on the following browsers:
- Safari 16.6.1 on macOS Big Sur
- Safari 18.1.1 on MacOS Sonoma
- DuckDuckGo 1.118.0 on macOS Big Sur and Sonoma
- Firefox 133.0.3 on macOS Big Sur
- Chrome 131.0.6778 on macOS Big Sur
Here are the errors
Safari while creating/updating an expression
@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:543:91 makeExprMenu@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:537:28 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:92:64 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:68 each@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:3133 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:35 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:98:44 forEach@[native code] @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:95:54 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:106:44 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/Observable.js:78:28 signalModified@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/ee.js:146:21 signalModified@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:40:29 reindexExpressions@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:71:32 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:608:40 dispatch@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:40040DuckDuckGo while clicking on status
http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-status.js:789:44 asyncFunctionResume@[native code] saveGridLayout@[native code] dispatchEvent@[native code] _triggerEvent@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:1401:30 _triggerAddEvent@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:1383:31 makeWidget@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:968:30 addWidget@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:388:24 placeWidgetAdder@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-status.js:183:44Firefox while updating a rule
@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:543:91 makeExprMenu@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:537:28 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:92:64 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:68 each@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:3133 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:35 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:98:44 forEach@[native code] @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:95:54 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:106:44 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/Observable.js:78:28 notifySaved@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/ee.js:82:21 notifySaved@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:47:26 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-rules.js:1460:39 forEach@[native code] @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-rules.js:1459:58Chrome while creating/updating an expression
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'getEditor') at RuleEditor.makeExprMenu (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/rule-editor.js:1788:86) at Object.handler (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/rule-editor.js:2174:54) at http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:98:44 at Array.forEach (<anonymous>) at MessageBus._sendToBus (http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:95:54) at MessageBus.send (http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:106:44) at ExpressionEditor.publish (http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/Observable.js:78:28) at ExpressionEditor.signalModified (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/ee.js:146:14) at ExpressionEditor.signalModified (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:40:15) at ExpressionEditor.reindexExpressions (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:71:18) `` -
ZWaveJSController - Warning/Error Traceback - Registering action set volume for Aeotec Siren 6 (ZW164)@toggledbits Since I have upgraded ZWaveJSController to 24293 from 24257 I am seeing entries related to registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability 143 every time I restart Reactor.
The Siren seems to be doing what it is supposed to do. The volume levels are fine. Should I worry about it?
Reactor version 24302
ZWaveJSController version 24293
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.27.4
zwave-js version 14.3.4[latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.852Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 143 endpoint 0 (entity "143-0") [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.854Z <Entity:WARN> Entity#zwavejs>143-1 registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.855Z <Entity:CRIT> Error: Traceback [-] Error: Traceback at Entity.registerAction (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Entity.js:703:288) at ZWaveJSController._register_node (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1689:112) at ZWaveJSController._register_nodes (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1401:84) at ZWaveJSController._process_init_data (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:844:38) at /var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:774:39 at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.859Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 143 endpoint 1 (entity "143-1") [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.860Z <Entity:WARN> Entity#zwavejs>143-2 registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.861Z <Entity:CRIT> Error: Traceback [-] Error: Traceback at Entity.registerAction (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Entity.js:703:288) at ZWaveJSController._register_node (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1689:112) at ZWaveJSController._register_nodes (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1401:84) at ZWaveJSController._process_init_data (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:844:38) at /var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:774:39 at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.864Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 143 endpoint 2 (entity "143-2") [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.866Z <Entity:WARN> Entity#zwavejs>143-3 registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.866Z <Entity:CRIT> Error: Traceback [-] Error: Traceback at Entity.registerAction (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Entity.js:703:288) at ZWaveJSController._register_node (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1689:112) at ZWaveJSController._register_nodes (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1401:84) at ZWaveJSController._process_init_data (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:844:38) at /var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:774:39 at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.870Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 143 endpoint 3 (entity "143-3") [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.871Z <Entity:WARN> Entity#zwavejs>143-4 registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.872Z <Entity:CRIT> Error: Traceback [-] Error: Traceback at Entity.registerAction (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Entity.js:703:288) at ZWaveJSController._register_node (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1689:112) at ZWaveJSController._register_nodes (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1401:84) at ZWaveJSController._process_init_data (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:844:38) at /var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:774:39 at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.876Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 143 endpoint 4 (entity "143-4") [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.878Z <Entity:WARN> Entity#zwavejs>143-5 registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.878Z <Entity:CRIT> Error: Traceback [-] Error: Traceback at Entity.registerAction (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Entity.js:703:288) at ZWaveJSController._register_node (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1689:112) at ZWaveJSController._register_nodes (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1401:84) at ZWaveJSController._process_init_data (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:844:38) at /var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:774:39 at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.881Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 143 endpoint 5 (entity "143-5") [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.883Z <Entity:WARN> Entity#zwavejs>143-6 registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.884Z <Entity:CRIT> Error: Traceback [-] Error: Traceback at Entity.registerAction (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Entity.js:703:288) at ZWaveJSController._register_node (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1689:112) at ZWaveJSController._register_nodes (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1401:84) at ZWaveJSController._process_init_data (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:844:38) at /var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:774:39 at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.887Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 143 endpoint 6 (entity "143-6") [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.888Z <Entity:WARN> Entity#zwavejs>143-7 registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.889Z <Entity:CRIT> Error: Traceback [-] Error: Traceback at Entity.registerAction (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Entity.js:703:288) at ZWaveJSController._register_node (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1689:112) at ZWaveJSController._register_nodes (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1401:84) at ZWaveJSController._process_init_data (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:844:38) at /var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:774:39 at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.892Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 143 endpoint 7 (entity "143-7") [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.893Z <Entity:WARN> Entity#zwavejs>143-8 registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.894Z <Entity:CRIT> Error: Traceback [-] Error: Traceback at Entity.registerAction (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Entity.js:703:288) at ZWaveJSController._register_node (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1689:112) at ZWaveJSController._register_nodes (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:1401:84) at ZWaveJSController._process_init_data (/var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:844:38) at /var/reactor/ext/ZWaveJSController/ZWaveJSController.js:774:39 at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) [latest-24302]2024-11-22T02:10:32.896Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 143 endpoint 8 (entity "143-8") -
Unusual zwavejs entity naming convention@toggledbits It appears the ZIP file you provided me with to fix the TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO tilt_sensor.state issue also fixed this topic. I do not see the unusual entity names. Thanks
-
TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO tilt_sensor.state (primary) = NULL@toggledbits The ZIP file fixed the issue. The tilt_sensor.state working as expected. Thanks
door_sensor.state=true tamper.state=true tilt_sensor.state=true -
TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO tilt_sensor.state (primary) = NULL@toggledbits I now have the requested log file.
-
TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO tilt_sensor.state (primary) = NULLI did open and close the garage door after updating Reactor. More than once. I even removed the battery to see if it would make a difference.
I am looking at the Notification values under ZWaveJS UI ans can see that the Window/door state do toggle between TRUE/FALSE when the door opens and closes. Nothing unusual here.
Looking at Binary Sensor values, I am seing this though. Makes sense?
When the garage door Opens
When the garage door Closes
-
Unusual zwavejs entity naming convention@toggledbits I have noticed after upgrading both Reactor and ZWaveJSController to version 24257 that two of my devices/entities, TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO and Zooz ZSE18, had their entity re-named in an unusual way and also appears to be duplicated.
Reactor version 24257
ZWaveJSController version 24257
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.18.1
zwave-js version 13.2.0Vestibule Motion Sensor State attributes/partial screenshot of entities it created. All entities have the same attributes.
motion_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Home_Security_Motion_sensor_status=8 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=23 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Home Security","Home Security","Motion sensor status","Motion sensor status"] zwave_device.version_info=null
Tilt Sensor Door State and Tilt Sensor Door State Simple attributes/partial screenshot of entities it created. All entities have similar attributes with exception of x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_State = 22 or 23.
tilt_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=22 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state","Door state"] zwave_device.version_info=nulltilt_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=22 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state (simple)","Door state (simple)"] zwave_device.version_info=nulltilt_sensor.state=false x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=23 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state","Door state"] zwave_device.version_info=nulltilt_sensor.state=false x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=23 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state (simple)","Door state (simple)"] zwave_device.version_info=null
-
TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO tilt_sensor.state (primary) = NULL@toggledbits I appears the tilt_sensor.state = false is back again after I upgraded both Reactor and ZWaveJSController to version 24257. It was working fine with ZWaveJSController version 24242.
I can certainly stop using this entity and use the door_sensor.state instead.
I did check the latest changes for zwave-js 13.2.0 and did not see any thing that may have been introduced causing this.
I have copied, below, the attributes of the tilt sensor in hopes it can help.
Thanks in advance.
Reactor version 24257
ZWaveJSController version 24257
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.18.1
zwave-js version 13.2.0battery_maintenance.charging=0 battery_maintenance.rechargeable=0 battery_maintenance.replace=false battery_maintenance.state="normal" battery_power.level=1 battery_power.since=null door_sensor.state=true tamper.state=true tilt_sensor.state=false x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Binary Sensor","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=7","description":"Z-Wave Plus Tilt Sensor","default_name":"Tilt Sensor","model":"TILTZWAVE2.5-ECO","capabilities":["tilt_sensor"],"primary_attribute":"tilt_sensor.state","values":[{"valueId":"32:currentValue:","capabilities":{"tilt_sensor":{"attributes":{"state":{}}}}},{"match":{"endpoint":0,"commandClass":48,"metadata.ccSpecific.sensorType":255},"capabilities":{"tilt_sensor":{"attributes":{"state":{}}}}},{"match":{"endpoint":0,"commandClass":113,"metadata.ccSpecific.notificationType":6},"capabilities":{"tilt_sensor":{"attributes":{"state":{"expr":"value === 22"}}}}}],"manufacturerId":330,"productType":4,"productId":3} x_zwave_values.Battery_isLow=false x_zwave_values.Battery_level=100 x_zwave_values.Binary_Sensor_Any=false x_zwave_values.Binary_Sensor_Door_Window=true x_zwave_values.Configuration_Basic_Sets_for_Association_Group_2=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Send_Reports=0 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=330 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=3 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=4 x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=22 x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=22 x_zwave_values.Notification_Home_Security_Cover_status=3 x_zwave_values.Notification_Power_Management_Battery_maintenance_status=0 x_zwave_values.Notification_UNKNOWN_0x46=23 x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmLevel=0 x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmType=0 x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["10.1"] x_zwave_values.Version_hardwareVersion=2 x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=6 x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="4.5" x_zwave_values.Wake_Up_controllerNodeId=1 x_zwave_values.Wake_Up_wakeUpInterval=14400 zwave_device.capabilities=[48,112,113,114,128,132,134] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=false zwave_device.generic_class="Notification Sensor" zwave_device.impl_sig="24256:1:24192:1" zwave_device.is_beaming=true zwave_device.is_listening=false zwave_device.is_routing=true zwave_device.is_secure=false zwave_device.last_wakeup=1726513928400 zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[330,4,3] zwave_device.max_data_rate=100000 zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.specific_class="Notification Sensor" zwave_device.status=1 zwave_device.status_text="asleep" zwave_device.version_info=[4,"10.1"] zwave_device.wakeup_interval=14400 -
How to reference a local expression inside a Shell Command@toggledbits It never crossed my mind to use HTTP. I'll give it a try.
-
How to reference a local expression inside a Shell CommandReferencing an expression inside a reaction is in the form of ${{ expression }}. When referenced inside my shell command to set the watering delay duration for my Rachio sprinkler system, it just does not work.
If I enter "86400" instead of referencing the expression lWateringDelayDuration, it works. Either I am doing something wrong or referencing an expression inside a shell command is not supported.
Reactor version: 24212
Local Expression
lWateringDelayDuration =WDD = getEntity( "hass>input_number_h_watering_delay_duration" ).attributes.value_sensor.value, if WDD == 0 then 0 elif WDD == 1 then 86400 elif WDD == 2 then 172800 elif WDD == 3 then 259200 elif WDD == 4 then 345600 endifSetting Reaction using Shell command
curl -X PUT -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer xxxxxxxxxx -d '{ "id" : "xxxxxxxxxx", "duration" : ${{ lWateringDelayDuration}} }' https://api.rach.io/1/public/device/rain_delayThanks in advance
-
TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO tilt_sensor.state (primary) = NULL@toggledbits That fixed it. Thank you sir.
battery_maintenance.charging=null
battery_maintenance.rechargeable=false
battery_maintenance.replace=false
battery_maintenance.state="normal"
battery_power.level=1
battery_power.since=1720778246637
door_sensor.state=true
power_source.source=null
tamper.state=true
tilt_sensor.state=true -
TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO tilt_sensor.state (primary) = NULL@toggledbits I just noticed that the
tilt_sensor.state = falsenow and no longer can be used in my rule. I have to usedoor_sensor.stateinstead.I cannot tell when the issue started and not sure if this is related to Reactor/ZwaveJSController implementation or the actual Z-Wave JS UI docker version. I have copied, below, the attributes of the tilt sensor in hopes it can help.
Thanks in advance.
Reactor version 24190
ZWaveJSController version 23326
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.14.5
zwave-js version 12.12.3battery_maintenance.charging=null
battery_maintenance.rechargeable=false
battery_maintenance.replace=false
battery_maintenance.state=null
battery_power.level=1
battery_power.since=1720636775292
door_sensor.state=true
power_source.source=null
tamper.state=true
tilt_sensor.state=false
x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Binary Sensor","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=7","description":"Z-Wave Plus Tilt Sensor","default_name":"Tilt Sensor","model":"TILTZWAVE2.5-ECO","capabilities":["tilt_sensor"],"primary_attribute":"tilt_sensor.state","values":[{"valueId":"32:currentValue:","capabilities":{"tilt_sensor":{"attributes":{"state":{}}}}},{"match":{"endpoint":0,"commandClass":48,"metadata.ccSpecific.sensorType":255},"capabilities":{"tilt_sensor":{"attributes":{"state":{}}}}}],"manufacturerId":330,"productType":4,"productId":3}
x_zwave_values.Battery_isLow=false
x_zwave_values.Battery_level=100
x_zwave_values.Binary_Sensor_Any=false
x_zwave_values.Binary_Sensor_Door_Window=true
x_zwave_values.Configuration_Basic_Sets_for_Association_Group_2=0
x_zwave_values.Configuration_Send_Reports=0
x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=330
x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=3
x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=4
x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=22
x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=22
x_zwave_values.Notification_Home_Security_Cover_status=3
x_zwave_values.Notification_Power_Management_Battery_maintenance_status=0
x_zwave_values.Notification_UNKNOWN_0x46=23
x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmLevel=0
x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmType=0
x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["10.1"]
x_zwave_values.Version_hardwareVersion=2
x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=6
x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="4.5"
x_zwave_values.Wake_Up_controllerNodeId=1
x_zwave_values.Wake_Up_wakeUpInterval=14400
zwave_device.capabilities=[48,112,113,114,128,132,134]
zwave_device.endpoint=0
zwave_device.failed=false
zwave_device.generic_class="Notification Sensor"
zwave_device.impl_sig="23326:1:23318:2"
zwave_device.is_beaming=false
zwave_device.is_listening=false
zwave_device.is_routing=true
zwave_device.is_secure=false
zwave_device.last_wakeup=1720636775220
zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[330,4,3]
zwave_device.max_data_rate=null
zwave_device.node_id=24
zwave_device.specific_class="Notification Sensor"
zwave_device.status=1
zwave_device.status_text="asleep"
zwave_device.version_info=[null,"10.1"]
zwave_device.wakeup_interval=14400 -
Smart plugs showing battery maintenance capability@toggledbits Got it. Will show all attributes next time. Thanks
-
Smart plugs showing battery maintenance capability@toggledbits Any reasons that might escape me why there are battery_maintenance attributes for the Zooz (ZEN04), Aeotec (ZWA023) and Dome (DMOF1) smart plugs (and probably other smart plugs)?
Again, not sure if this is related to Reactor/ZwaveJSController implementation or the actual Z-Wave JS UI docker version. I have copied, below, the attributes in question in hopes it can help.
Thanks in advance.
Reactor: 23344
ZWaveJSController: 9.6.0.ec8995c
zwave-js: 12.4.1
home id: 3589098709
home hex: 0xd5ed4cd5PS I could copy all attributes but there are too many to be listed in this thread.
Attributes
battery_maintenance.charging=null battery_maintenance.rechargeable=false battery_maintenance.replace=false battery_maintenance.state=null