Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Using `format()` to build notification and other strings
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Answered] OK to remove old json files?
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deprecation Announcement: 32-bit ARM *docker* images
toggledbitsT
If you are using the armv7l docker image, the OpenJS Foundation that publishes node is no longer producing 32-bit builds as of v24. That means the last supported LTS version of node for armv7l is v22, which will go End-of-Life in May 2027. Therefore, the Reactor armv7l image is now deprecated and will only be produced until node v22 goes EOL, and I will not publish armv7l images beyond that date. If you are running an RPi 3 or earlier with Reactor, you are on this image, and will need to upgrade hardware to a 64-bit model and use the arm64 image. If you need help getting it done, ask in this category.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] build 26150 - engine not starting
G
@toggledbits I pulled the image (well, Watchtower did) and within minutes the whole system went offline. The log looks like it ends with 26143. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mkahsmgf/26qq82mw-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lqyfljfi/22f8on0t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lsb61rw8/24oenqi2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/rule-lrh58he0:S-1c00gfib-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1c00dylr-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1nam9w5u-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miuh2qqi/22ls4lql-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1vj8sdfc-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1qanz01x-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/24lq19p6-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mk0o8iox/23oy468y-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miscg2h3/rule-miscg2h3:S-22gmbq1c-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrfjke/238p0old-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-m7ccsso5/re-m7ccsso5-1r0myjxa-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/19nl9wq2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3xk9t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3vv5m-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/re-ln7j2nqp-22mx9lzd-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/22mx87c8-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-licneppy/1mzwe7ht-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ml3194ih/25jqt1j4-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrg7kf/227hshak-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13ua1p95-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13uagam7-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x4cbv-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x2fyl-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-lscjrws1/238p5c22-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lbwr0jvq/1xkczf03-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <Structure:NOTICE> Structure Structure#1 stopped [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <app:NOTICE> Closing APIs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: disconnecting from "192.168.1.23#82" (1001 service closing) [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.548Z <httpapi:NOTICE> HTTP API closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: server closed [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <httpapi:INFO> HTTP server closed. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <app:NOTICE> Stopping timers... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Shutdown complete, process ID 1 [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Closing logs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <default:null> Closing log I can SSH to the VM. Alas, I do not have the previous image for 26143 as I'm a little too quick sometimes on housekeeping.
Multi-System Reactor
http request action & digest auth
tunnusT
I’m using the HTTP Request action in MSR and need to authenticate against an endpoint that uses HTTP Digest authentication. Now that endpoint was changed to use SHA-256 in digest auth, so I would like to know if MSR supports it, or is it limited to MD5-based digest auth?
Multi-System Reactor

Using `format()` to build notification and other strings

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
14 Posts 3 Posters 2.3k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
    #1

    A few new functions have worked their way into Reactor's expression language over the last couple of months, and while they are documented in the change logs and documentation, it seems some of you are not aware of them, so I'm going to pick one out and highlight it, maybe do others later...

    A lot of you build strings in expressions by simple concatenation, and there's nothing wrong with that, but there's a new function in the expression language that can help you clean things up, in particular when handling numeric values.

    I've noticed many of you will round your results either on the calculation, or in some cases, in a separate variable. For example, say we have a pair of expressions that retrieves the indoor and outdoor temperature from a sensor and the weather service:

    indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
    outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
    

    The weather service, since it converts from degrees K in its reporting to degrees C, may have an irrational or repeating value (e.g. 8.233333333...). As a result, when you compute the difference, it, too, may have an irrational or repeating result, so you decide to round it to one decimal:

    tempDiff = round( outdoor - indoor, 1 )
    

    Then, perhaps you have a rule that if the differential is greater than 10 degrees, you send a notification, and the notification uses all three variables in the message string:

    ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + outdoor + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
    

    This is fine, except that the outdoor temperature isn't rounded, so you decide to fix that. There are at least three ways: add a round() to the outdoor variable expression, or create a third variable like outdoorRounded = round( outdoor, 1 ), or, use the round() function into the substitution expression

    ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + round( outdoor, 1 ) + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
    

    It's all getting very messy... Let's use format() instead of string concatenation, and not worry about rounding the difference, so we keep the maximum precision possible for any calcs or tests that use it. We go back to:

    indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
    outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
    tempDiff = outdoor - indoor
    

    Now our string substitution:

    ${{ format( "The outdoor temperature is {0:.1f}C and the indoor temperature is {1:.1f}C; the difference is {2:.1f}C", outdoor, indoor, tempDiff ) }}
    

    Here, format() is building the message string. Each {} (curly-brace) pair denotes the substitution of a parameter to follow. The number first inside the opening curly brace is the parameter number, starting from 0 as the first parameter. So parameter 0 in this example refers to the variable outdoor, and 1 is indoor, and 2 is tempDiff. Using the numbers, parameters can be inserted in any order.

    Each of these substitutions in the example includes an optional format specification. If no format specification is given (e.g. {0}), then the parameter is converted to a string with no special formatting, but since we can get numbers like 8.233333... it's desirable to use some formatting to make it pretty. The format is separated from the parameter number by the : (colon) in the substitution. The format we're using for all three parameters is .1f, which is <width>.<precision>f. Any number before the dot is a fixed field width, but since we want no extra spaces, we just don't specify a width (it's blank for our example), and the value will take as much space as it needs. The f at the end tells format() that the value is going to be formatted as a floating point number, and the .1 before the f tells the formatter to display a single decimal digit. So our 8.23333333 value would be displayed as 8.2, without using extra functions or variables, or dropping precision in a calculation. For clarity, 10.875 would be displayed/inserted as 10.9 in this example, because the formatter will round the displayed result to the specified number of decimal digits.

    Tip: for simple string insertions that require no special formatting, format() will let you skip the parameter numbers if the parameters are in the same order as the substitutions, and the default format is (generic) string (s), so format( "{} x {} = {}", "alpha", "beta", "gamma" ) produces the string alpha x beta = gamma.

    Docs for format are in the Reactor documentation under the heading Special Reactor Functions.

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    wmarcolinW 2 Replies Last reply
    4
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      A few new functions have worked their way into Reactor's expression language over the last couple of months, and while they are documented in the change logs and documentation, it seems some of you are not aware of them, so I'm going to pick one out and highlight it, maybe do others later...

      A lot of you build strings in expressions by simple concatenation, and there's nothing wrong with that, but there's a new function in the expression language that can help you clean things up, in particular when handling numeric values.

      I've noticed many of you will round your results either on the calculation, or in some cases, in a separate variable. For example, say we have a pair of expressions that retrieves the indoor and outdoor temperature from a sensor and the weather service:

      indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
      outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
      

      The weather service, since it converts from degrees K in its reporting to degrees C, may have an irrational or repeating value (e.g. 8.233333333...). As a result, when you compute the difference, it, too, may have an irrational or repeating result, so you decide to round it to one decimal:

      tempDiff = round( outdoor - indoor, 1 )
      

      Then, perhaps you have a rule that if the differential is greater than 10 degrees, you send a notification, and the notification uses all three variables in the message string:

      ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + outdoor + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
      

      This is fine, except that the outdoor temperature isn't rounded, so you decide to fix that. There are at least three ways: add a round() to the outdoor variable expression, or create a third variable like outdoorRounded = round( outdoor, 1 ), or, use the round() function into the substitution expression

      ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + round( outdoor, 1 ) + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
      

      It's all getting very messy... Let's use format() instead of string concatenation, and not worry about rounding the difference, so we keep the maximum precision possible for any calcs or tests that use it. We go back to:

      indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
      outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
      tempDiff = outdoor - indoor
      

      Now our string substitution:

      ${{ format( "The outdoor temperature is {0:.1f}C and the indoor temperature is {1:.1f}C; the difference is {2:.1f}C", outdoor, indoor, tempDiff ) }}
      

      Here, format() is building the message string. Each {} (curly-brace) pair denotes the substitution of a parameter to follow. The number first inside the opening curly brace is the parameter number, starting from 0 as the first parameter. So parameter 0 in this example refers to the variable outdoor, and 1 is indoor, and 2 is tempDiff. Using the numbers, parameters can be inserted in any order.

      Each of these substitutions in the example includes an optional format specification. If no format specification is given (e.g. {0}), then the parameter is converted to a string with no special formatting, but since we can get numbers like 8.233333... it's desirable to use some formatting to make it pretty. The format is separated from the parameter number by the : (colon) in the substitution. The format we're using for all three parameters is .1f, which is <width>.<precision>f. Any number before the dot is a fixed field width, but since we want no extra spaces, we just don't specify a width (it's blank for our example), and the value will take as much space as it needs. The f at the end tells format() that the value is going to be formatted as a floating point number, and the .1 before the f tells the formatter to display a single decimal digit. So our 8.23333333 value would be displayed as 8.2, without using extra functions or variables, or dropping precision in a calculation. For clarity, 10.875 would be displayed/inserted as 10.9 in this example, because the formatter will round the displayed result to the specified number of decimal digits.

      Tip: for simple string insertions that require no special formatting, format() will let you skip the parameter numbers if the parameters are in the same order as the substitutions, and the default format is (generic) string (s), so format( "{} x {} = {}", "alpha", "beta", "gamma" ) produces the string alpha x beta = gamma.

      Docs for format are in the Reactor documentation under the heading Special Reactor Functions.

      wmarcolinW Offline
      wmarcolinW Offline
      wmarcolin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @toggledbits

      d96567c8-5007-4b0b-8fa0-94d1f534f5d5-imagem.png

      Another lesson, and a show of function. Sure, will help a lot.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSun
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Love it! Two things just so you know I was paying attention:

        1. Numbers like 8.2333... are not "irrational" (as 'pi' would be), just plain rational-but-repeating.
        2. Yay for new functions like this; only reason I never commented or utilized is that my focus has been forced elsewhere lately.

        Definitely planning to revisit things like my dozen or so "Messaging" rules that insert expressions into boilerplate text, à la mail merge.
        THANKS for your ongoing dedication to making MSR the snizznel!!

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          A few new functions have worked their way into Reactor's expression language over the last couple of months, and while they are documented in the change logs and documentation, it seems some of you are not aware of them, so I'm going to pick one out and highlight it, maybe do others later...

          A lot of you build strings in expressions by simple concatenation, and there's nothing wrong with that, but there's a new function in the expression language that can help you clean things up, in particular when handling numeric values.

          I've noticed many of you will round your results either on the calculation, or in some cases, in a separate variable. For example, say we have a pair of expressions that retrieves the indoor and outdoor temperature from a sensor and the weather service:

          indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
          outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
          

          The weather service, since it converts from degrees K in its reporting to degrees C, may have an irrational or repeating value (e.g. 8.233333333...). As a result, when you compute the difference, it, too, may have an irrational or repeating result, so you decide to round it to one decimal:

          tempDiff = round( outdoor - indoor, 1 )
          

          Then, perhaps you have a rule that if the differential is greater than 10 degrees, you send a notification, and the notification uses all three variables in the message string:

          ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + outdoor + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
          

          This is fine, except that the outdoor temperature isn't rounded, so you decide to fix that. There are at least three ways: add a round() to the outdoor variable expression, or create a third variable like outdoorRounded = round( outdoor, 1 ), or, use the round() function into the substitution expression

          ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + round( outdoor, 1 ) + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
          

          It's all getting very messy... Let's use format() instead of string concatenation, and not worry about rounding the difference, so we keep the maximum precision possible for any calcs or tests that use it. We go back to:

          indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
          outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
          tempDiff = outdoor - indoor
          

          Now our string substitution:

          ${{ format( "The outdoor temperature is {0:.1f}C and the indoor temperature is {1:.1f}C; the difference is {2:.1f}C", outdoor, indoor, tempDiff ) }}
          

          Here, format() is building the message string. Each {} (curly-brace) pair denotes the substitution of a parameter to follow. The number first inside the opening curly brace is the parameter number, starting from 0 as the first parameter. So parameter 0 in this example refers to the variable outdoor, and 1 is indoor, and 2 is tempDiff. Using the numbers, parameters can be inserted in any order.

          Each of these substitutions in the example includes an optional format specification. If no format specification is given (e.g. {0}), then the parameter is converted to a string with no special formatting, but since we can get numbers like 8.233333... it's desirable to use some formatting to make it pretty. The format is separated from the parameter number by the : (colon) in the substitution. The format we're using for all three parameters is .1f, which is <width>.<precision>f. Any number before the dot is a fixed field width, but since we want no extra spaces, we just don't specify a width (it's blank for our example), and the value will take as much space as it needs. The f at the end tells format() that the value is going to be formatted as a floating point number, and the .1 before the f tells the formatter to display a single decimal digit. So our 8.23333333 value would be displayed as 8.2, without using extra functions or variables, or dropping precision in a calculation. For clarity, 10.875 would be displayed/inserted as 10.9 in this example, because the formatter will round the displayed result to the specified number of decimal digits.

          Tip: for simple string insertions that require no special formatting, format() will let you skip the parameter numbers if the parameters are in the same order as the substitutions, and the default format is (generic) string (s), so format( "{} x {} = {}", "alpha", "beta", "gamma" ) produces the string alpha x beta = gamma.

          Docs for format are in the Reactor documentation under the heading Special Reactor Functions.

          wmarcolinW Offline
          wmarcolinW Offline
          wmarcolin
          wrote on last edited by wmarcolin
          #4

          @toggledbits

          I have the following array > BatteryLow = ["Door Auxiliar Room 66%","Door Lock Kitchen 55%","Motion Closed 33%","Motion Kitchen 65%"]

          Using the format() function > ${{ format( "List of low battery: {}.", BatteryLow ) }}

          Generates the result in a notification > List of low battery: Door Auxiliar Room 66%,Door Lock Kitchen 55%,Motion Closed 33%,Motion Kitchen 65%.

          All separated by a comma ",".

          Examples (spaces shown as "⋅" for clarity only):

          Questions:

          1. how is it possible to format the separator to be for example comma space ",⋅"

          List of low battery: Door Auxiliar Room 66%,⋅Door Lock Kitchen 55%,⋅Motion Closed 33%,⋅Motion Kitchen 65%.

          1. Or if I want to change for example, space bar space "⋅/⋅"

          List of low battery: Door Auxiliar Room 66%⋅/⋅Door Lock Kitchen 55%⋅/⋅Motion Closed 33%⋅/⋅Motion Kitchen 65%.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            This has been mentioned and used in other threads on the more specific topic of creating and handling lists of failed or otherwise "in need of notification" devices...

            You are passing an array into format() directly, and asking it to format it as a string using default formatting. The default formatting isn't very interesting/pretty for arrays. But the join() function specifically converts an array to a string using a provided separator (another string).

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              This has been mentioned and used in other threads on the more specific topic of creating and handling lists of failed or otherwise "in need of notification" devices...

              You are passing an array into format() directly, and asking it to format it as a string using default formatting. The default formatting isn't very interesting/pretty for arrays. But the join() function specifically converts an array to a string using a provided separator (another string).

              wmarcolinW Offline
              wmarcolinW Offline
              wmarcolin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @toggledbits Ok got it, I was using joing() before, and it generated the third variable with the final text.

              As we discussed in the other threads when using sort() that already generates the final name, I'm adding the space (" " + e.name), so it solved the presentation.

              The format() function is very interesting, and worked great with array, eliminated one step and one variable.

              Thanks

              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • wmarcolinW wmarcolin

                @toggledbits Ok got it, I was using joing() before, and it generated the third variable with the final text.

                As we discussed in the other threads when using sort() that already generates the final name, I'm adding the space (" " + e.name), so it solved the presentation.

                The format() function is very interesting, and worked great with array, eliminated one step and one variable.

                Thanks

                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @wmarcolin said in Using &#x60;format()&#x60; to build notification and other strings:

                I was using joing() before, and it generated the third variable with the final text.

                Don't understand. Can you elaborate?

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  @wmarcolin said in Using &#x60;format()&#x60; to build notification and other strings:

                  I was using joing() before, and it generated the third variable with the final text.

                  Don't understand. Can you elaborate?

                  wmarcolinW Offline
                  wmarcolinW Offline
                  wmarcolin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @toggledbits as we said, we are good at creating problems, not explaining 😁 this is also valid when we are creative 😊

                  Ok, before I first created an array with the list of devices with problem (OldFaultOn) and then in a second step without sorting the names, I generated into a new variable the string with the names (OldFaultMSG), separated by comma and space.

                  1a243f0a-c53a-47be-af43-e0265228bda0-imagem.png

                  With the brilliant sort() function I am already directly generating the list of device names, sorted.

                  c915f16f-3a92-4772-969c-8e50b1583cff-imagem.png

                  This eliminated having to have other variable to store the information to be displayed. As commented before, when using format() ahead, the function displays the whole array separated only by a comma. To improve the display it would be good to have a comma and space before the next name. So I decided to put space in the sort (" " + e.name).

                  I previously set up the notification like this.

                  dbf20e2d-b40e-4b6e-a7b4-b817ea467ef8-imagem.png

                  48153bc1-15a5-4c4c-99a1-4012b9675c0f-imagem.png

                  And now using sort() and format().

                  5e5689fa-933e-4f5d-b1ef-72fac6331ee7-imagem.png

                  33c3e35a-9458-4e71-918d-85574be7138a-imagem.png

                  I believe we have many ways of doing things, I am looking to improve the use of functions.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #9

                    Since the result of sort() is an array, you can wrap the sort() with join(), no need for an extra variable.

                    FaultOn = join( sort( each id of FaultSensor: do e=getEntity(id), e?.attributes?.x_vera_device?.failed == true ? e.name : null done ), ", " )
                    

                    This would, of course, change the type of FaultOn to a string.

                    If you wanted to preserve the array for other uses, you could also apply the join() to the format() substitution on the array: ${{ format( "Failed devices: {}", join(FaultOn, ", ") ) }}

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    wmarcolinW 2 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      Since the result of sort() is an array, you can wrap the sort() with join(), no need for an extra variable.

                      FaultOn = join( sort( each id of FaultSensor: do e=getEntity(id), e?.attributes?.x_vera_device?.failed == true ? e.name : null done ), ", " )
                      

                      This would, of course, change the type of FaultOn to a string.

                      If you wanted to preserve the array for other uses, you could also apply the join() to the format() substitution on the array: ${{ format( "Failed devices: {}", join(FaultOn, ", ") ) }}

                      wmarcolinW Offline
                      wmarcolinW Offline
                      wmarcolin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @toggledbits nothing like talking to a Jedi master.

                      925c1ae8-b4e2-477a-a38e-a15905b8f0ae-imagem.png

                      I will go with the second option, to preserve the array, I think it may have a better future use.

                      Thanks!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        Since the result of sort() is an array, you can wrap the sort() with join(), no need for an extra variable.

                        FaultOn = join( sort( each id of FaultSensor: do e=getEntity(id), e?.attributes?.x_vera_device?.failed == true ? e.name : null done ), ", " )
                        

                        This would, of course, change the type of FaultOn to a string.

                        If you wanted to preserve the array for other uses, you could also apply the join() to the format() substitution on the array: ${{ format( "Failed devices: {}", join(FaultOn, ", ") ) }}

                        wmarcolinW Offline
                        wmarcolinW Offline
                        wmarcolin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @toggledbits

                        With the new DynamicGroupController option, is it now possible to override all this instruction to use format() directly?

                        bd400cc0-f1ce-4700-b7d3-577a4a8495ac-image.png f79b4c0d-3262-43d7-abf4-3544df1f008e-image.png

                        Or is it necessary to first transform the IDs that appear in the object carrying the name and format, and only then be able to send a text message?

                        Can you help Patrick, I am not really sure now how to go about this.

                        Thanks.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          I will leave this for you to think about, or perhaps some other users can chime in with some assistance. Try some things, observe, fail, and learn. 🙂

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            I will leave this for you to think about, or perhaps some other users can chime in with some assistance. Try some things, observe, fail, and learn. 🙂

                            wmarcolinW Offline
                            wmarcolinW Offline
                            wmarcolin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @toggledbits done 🙂

                            sort( each id in getEntity('groups>low_battery').attributes.sys_group.members: getEntity(id).name + " " + int(getEntity(id).attributes.battery_power.level *100) + "%")

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • LibraSunL Offline
                              LibraSunL Offline
                              LibraSun
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Looks good, though I swear you might be missing a closing parenthesis at the end?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              Recent Topics

                              • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                                CrilleC
                                Crille
                                0
                                5
                                64

                              • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                5
                                148
                                129.0k

                              • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                                therealdbT
                                therealdb
                                1
                                5
                                87

                              • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                5
                                111

                              • Upgrade Issues
                                T
                                tbully
                                0
                                9
                                218

                              • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                10
                                230

                              • [SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
                                G
                                gwp1
                                0
                                5
                                117

                              • openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
                                A
                                a-lurker
                                0
                                2
                                169

                              • Logon screen timeout
                                G
                                gwp1
                                0
                                5
                                190

                              • [MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                9
                                354

                              • Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                4
                                210
                              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                              Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Unsolved