Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Using `format()` to build notification and other strings
Self test
CatmanV2C
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something? Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Using `format()` to build notification and other strings

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
14 Posts 3 Posters 1.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
    #1

    A few new functions have worked their way into Reactor's expression language over the last couple of months, and while they are documented in the change logs and documentation, it seems some of you are not aware of them, so I'm going to pick one out and highlight it, maybe do others later...

    A lot of you build strings in expressions by simple concatenation, and there's nothing wrong with that, but there's a new function in the expression language that can help you clean things up, in particular when handling numeric values.

    I've noticed many of you will round your results either on the calculation, or in some cases, in a separate variable. For example, say we have a pair of expressions that retrieves the indoor and outdoor temperature from a sensor and the weather service:

    indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
    outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
    

    The weather service, since it converts from degrees K in its reporting to degrees C, may have an irrational or repeating value (e.g. 8.233333333...). As a result, when you compute the difference, it, too, may have an irrational or repeating result, so you decide to round it to one decimal:

    tempDiff = round( outdoor - indoor, 1 )
    

    Then, perhaps you have a rule that if the differential is greater than 10 degrees, you send a notification, and the notification uses all three variables in the message string:

    ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + outdoor + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
    

    This is fine, except that the outdoor temperature isn't rounded, so you decide to fix that. There are at least three ways: add a round() to the outdoor variable expression, or create a third variable like outdoorRounded = round( outdoor, 1 ), or, use the round() function into the substitution expression

    ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + round( outdoor, 1 ) + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
    

    It's all getting very messy... Let's use format() instead of string concatenation, and not worry about rounding the difference, so we keep the maximum precision possible for any calcs or tests that use it. We go back to:

    indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
    outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
    tempDiff = outdoor - indoor
    

    Now our string substitution:

    ${{ format( "The outdoor temperature is {0:.1f}C and the indoor temperature is {1:.1f}C; the difference is {2:.1f}C", outdoor, indoor, tempDiff ) }}
    

    Here, format() is building the message string. Each {} (curly-brace) pair denotes the substitution of a parameter to follow. The number first inside the opening curly brace is the parameter number, starting from 0 as the first parameter. So parameter 0 in this example refers to the variable outdoor, and 1 is indoor, and 2 is tempDiff. Using the numbers, parameters can be inserted in any order.

    Each of these substitutions in the example includes an optional format specification. If no format specification is given (e.g. {0}), then the parameter is converted to a string with no special formatting, but since we can get numbers like 8.233333... it's desirable to use some formatting to make it pretty. The format is separated from the parameter number by the : (colon) in the substitution. The format we're using for all three parameters is .1f, which is <width>.<precision>f. Any number before the dot is a fixed field width, but since we want no extra spaces, we just don't specify a width (it's blank for our example), and the value will take as much space as it needs. The f at the end tells format() that the value is going to be formatted as a floating point number, and the .1 before the f tells the formatter to display a single decimal digit. So our 8.23333333 value would be displayed as 8.2, without using extra functions or variables, or dropping precision in a calculation. For clarity, 10.875 would be displayed/inserted as 10.9 in this example, because the formatter will round the displayed result to the specified number of decimal digits.

    Tip: for simple string insertions that require no special formatting, format() will let you skip the parameter numbers if the parameters are in the same order as the substitutions, and the default format is (generic) string (s), so format( "{} x {} = {}", "alpha", "beta", "gamma" ) produces the string alpha x beta = gamma.

    Docs for format are in the Reactor documentation under the heading Special Reactor Functions.

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    wmarcolinW 2 Replies Last reply
    4
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      A few new functions have worked their way into Reactor's expression language over the last couple of months, and while they are documented in the change logs and documentation, it seems some of you are not aware of them, so I'm going to pick one out and highlight it, maybe do others later...

      A lot of you build strings in expressions by simple concatenation, and there's nothing wrong with that, but there's a new function in the expression language that can help you clean things up, in particular when handling numeric values.

      I've noticed many of you will round your results either on the calculation, or in some cases, in a separate variable. For example, say we have a pair of expressions that retrieves the indoor and outdoor temperature from a sensor and the weather service:

      indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
      outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
      

      The weather service, since it converts from degrees K in its reporting to degrees C, may have an irrational or repeating value (e.g. 8.233333333...). As a result, when you compute the difference, it, too, may have an irrational or repeating result, so you decide to round it to one decimal:

      tempDiff = round( outdoor - indoor, 1 )
      

      Then, perhaps you have a rule that if the differential is greater than 10 degrees, you send a notification, and the notification uses all three variables in the message string:

      ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + outdoor + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
      

      This is fine, except that the outdoor temperature isn't rounded, so you decide to fix that. There are at least three ways: add a round() to the outdoor variable expression, or create a third variable like outdoorRounded = round( outdoor, 1 ), or, use the round() function into the substitution expression

      ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + round( outdoor, 1 ) + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
      

      It's all getting very messy... Let's use format() instead of string concatenation, and not worry about rounding the difference, so we keep the maximum precision possible for any calcs or tests that use it. We go back to:

      indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
      outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
      tempDiff = outdoor - indoor
      

      Now our string substitution:

      ${{ format( "The outdoor temperature is {0:.1f}C and the indoor temperature is {1:.1f}C; the difference is {2:.1f}C", outdoor, indoor, tempDiff ) }}
      

      Here, format() is building the message string. Each {} (curly-brace) pair denotes the substitution of a parameter to follow. The number first inside the opening curly brace is the parameter number, starting from 0 as the first parameter. So parameter 0 in this example refers to the variable outdoor, and 1 is indoor, and 2 is tempDiff. Using the numbers, parameters can be inserted in any order.

      Each of these substitutions in the example includes an optional format specification. If no format specification is given (e.g. {0}), then the parameter is converted to a string with no special formatting, but since we can get numbers like 8.233333... it's desirable to use some formatting to make it pretty. The format is separated from the parameter number by the : (colon) in the substitution. The format we're using for all three parameters is .1f, which is <width>.<precision>f. Any number before the dot is a fixed field width, but since we want no extra spaces, we just don't specify a width (it's blank for our example), and the value will take as much space as it needs. The f at the end tells format() that the value is going to be formatted as a floating point number, and the .1 before the f tells the formatter to display a single decimal digit. So our 8.23333333 value would be displayed as 8.2, without using extra functions or variables, or dropping precision in a calculation. For clarity, 10.875 would be displayed/inserted as 10.9 in this example, because the formatter will round the displayed result to the specified number of decimal digits.

      Tip: for simple string insertions that require no special formatting, format() will let you skip the parameter numbers if the parameters are in the same order as the substitutions, and the default format is (generic) string (s), so format( "{} x {} = {}", "alpha", "beta", "gamma" ) produces the string alpha x beta = gamma.

      Docs for format are in the Reactor documentation under the heading Special Reactor Functions.

      wmarcolinW Offline
      wmarcolinW Offline
      wmarcolin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @toggledbits

      d96567c8-5007-4b0b-8fa0-94d1f534f5d5-imagem.png

      Another lesson, and a show of function. Sure, will help a lot.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSun
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Love it! Two things just so you know I was paying attention:

        1. Numbers like 8.2333... are not "irrational" (as 'pi' would be), just plain rational-but-repeating.
        2. Yay for new functions like this; only reason I never commented or utilized is that my focus has been forced elsewhere lately.

        Definitely planning to revisit things like my dozen or so "Messaging" rules that insert expressions into boilerplate text, à la mail merge.
        THANKS for your ongoing dedication to making MSR the snizznel!!

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          A few new functions have worked their way into Reactor's expression language over the last couple of months, and while they are documented in the change logs and documentation, it seems some of you are not aware of them, so I'm going to pick one out and highlight it, maybe do others later...

          A lot of you build strings in expressions by simple concatenation, and there's nothing wrong with that, but there's a new function in the expression language that can help you clean things up, in particular when handling numeric values.

          I've noticed many of you will round your results either on the calculation, or in some cases, in a separate variable. For example, say we have a pair of expressions that retrieves the indoor and outdoor temperature from a sensor and the weather service:

          indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
          outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
          

          The weather service, since it converts from degrees K in its reporting to degrees C, may have an irrational or repeating value (e.g. 8.233333333...). As a result, when you compute the difference, it, too, may have an irrational or repeating result, so you decide to round it to one decimal:

          tempDiff = round( outdoor - indoor, 1 )
          

          Then, perhaps you have a rule that if the differential is greater than 10 degrees, you send a notification, and the notification uses all three variables in the message string:

          ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + outdoor + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
          

          This is fine, except that the outdoor temperature isn't rounded, so you decide to fix that. There are at least three ways: add a round() to the outdoor variable expression, or create a third variable like outdoorRounded = round( outdoor, 1 ), or, use the round() function into the substitution expression

          ${{ 'The outdoor temperature is ' + round( outdoor, 1 ) + 'C and the indoor temperature is ' + indoor + 'C; the difference is ' + tempDiff + 'C' }}
          

          It's all getting very messy... Let's use format() instead of string concatenation, and not worry about rounding the difference, so we keep the maximum precision possible for any calcs or tests that use it. We go back to:

          indoor = getEntity( 'hubitat>144' ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value' )
          outdoor = getEntity( 'weather>home' ).attributes.wx.temperature
          tempDiff = outdoor - indoor
          

          Now our string substitution:

          ${{ format( "The outdoor temperature is {0:.1f}C and the indoor temperature is {1:.1f}C; the difference is {2:.1f}C", outdoor, indoor, tempDiff ) }}
          

          Here, format() is building the message string. Each {} (curly-brace) pair denotes the substitution of a parameter to follow. The number first inside the opening curly brace is the parameter number, starting from 0 as the first parameter. So parameter 0 in this example refers to the variable outdoor, and 1 is indoor, and 2 is tempDiff. Using the numbers, parameters can be inserted in any order.

          Each of these substitutions in the example includes an optional format specification. If no format specification is given (e.g. {0}), then the parameter is converted to a string with no special formatting, but since we can get numbers like 8.233333... it's desirable to use some formatting to make it pretty. The format is separated from the parameter number by the : (colon) in the substitution. The format we're using for all three parameters is .1f, which is <width>.<precision>f. Any number before the dot is a fixed field width, but since we want no extra spaces, we just don't specify a width (it's blank for our example), and the value will take as much space as it needs. The f at the end tells format() that the value is going to be formatted as a floating point number, and the .1 before the f tells the formatter to display a single decimal digit. So our 8.23333333 value would be displayed as 8.2, without using extra functions or variables, or dropping precision in a calculation. For clarity, 10.875 would be displayed/inserted as 10.9 in this example, because the formatter will round the displayed result to the specified number of decimal digits.

          Tip: for simple string insertions that require no special formatting, format() will let you skip the parameter numbers if the parameters are in the same order as the substitutions, and the default format is (generic) string (s), so format( "{} x {} = {}", "alpha", "beta", "gamma" ) produces the string alpha x beta = gamma.

          Docs for format are in the Reactor documentation under the heading Special Reactor Functions.

          wmarcolinW Offline
          wmarcolinW Offline
          wmarcolin
          wrote on last edited by wmarcolin
          #4

          @toggledbits

          I have the following array > BatteryLow = ["Door Auxiliar Room 66%","Door Lock Kitchen 55%","Motion Closed 33%","Motion Kitchen 65%"]

          Using the format() function > ${{ format( "List of low battery: {}.", BatteryLow ) }}

          Generates the result in a notification > List of low battery: Door Auxiliar Room 66%,Door Lock Kitchen 55%,Motion Closed 33%,Motion Kitchen 65%.

          All separated by a comma ",".

          Examples (spaces shown as "⋅" for clarity only):

          Questions:

          1. how is it possible to format the separator to be for example comma space ",⋅"

          List of low battery: Door Auxiliar Room 66%,⋅Door Lock Kitchen 55%,⋅Motion Closed 33%,⋅Motion Kitchen 65%.

          1. Or if I want to change for example, space bar space "⋅/⋅"

          List of low battery: Door Auxiliar Room 66%⋅/⋅Door Lock Kitchen 55%⋅/⋅Motion Closed 33%⋅/⋅Motion Kitchen 65%.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            This has been mentioned and used in other threads on the more specific topic of creating and handling lists of failed or otherwise "in need of notification" devices...

            You are passing an array into format() directly, and asking it to format it as a string using default formatting. The default formatting isn't very interesting/pretty for arrays. But the join() function specifically converts an array to a string using a provided separator (another string).

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              This has been mentioned and used in other threads on the more specific topic of creating and handling lists of failed or otherwise "in need of notification" devices...

              You are passing an array into format() directly, and asking it to format it as a string using default formatting. The default formatting isn't very interesting/pretty for arrays. But the join() function specifically converts an array to a string using a provided separator (another string).

              wmarcolinW Offline
              wmarcolinW Offline
              wmarcolin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @toggledbits Ok got it, I was using joing() before, and it generated the third variable with the final text.

              As we discussed in the other threads when using sort() that already generates the final name, I'm adding the space (" " + e.name), so it solved the presentation.

              The format() function is very interesting, and worked great with array, eliminated one step and one variable.

              Thanks

              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • wmarcolinW wmarcolin

                @toggledbits Ok got it, I was using joing() before, and it generated the third variable with the final text.

                As we discussed in the other threads when using sort() that already generates the final name, I'm adding the space (" " + e.name), so it solved the presentation.

                The format() function is very interesting, and worked great with array, eliminated one step and one variable.

                Thanks

                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @wmarcolin said in Using &#x60;format()&#x60; to build notification and other strings:

                I was using joing() before, and it generated the third variable with the final text.

                Don't understand. Can you elaborate?

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  @wmarcolin said in Using &#x60;format()&#x60; to build notification and other strings:

                  I was using joing() before, and it generated the third variable with the final text.

                  Don't understand. Can you elaborate?

                  wmarcolinW Offline
                  wmarcolinW Offline
                  wmarcolin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @toggledbits as we said, we are good at creating problems, not explaining 😁 this is also valid when we are creative 😊

                  Ok, before I first created an array with the list of devices with problem (OldFaultOn) and then in a second step without sorting the names, I generated into a new variable the string with the names (OldFaultMSG), separated by comma and space.

                  1a243f0a-c53a-47be-af43-e0265228bda0-imagem.png

                  With the brilliant sort() function I am already directly generating the list of device names, sorted.

                  c915f16f-3a92-4772-969c-8e50b1583cff-imagem.png

                  This eliminated having to have other variable to store the information to be displayed. As commented before, when using format() ahead, the function displays the whole array separated only by a comma. To improve the display it would be good to have a comma and space before the next name. So I decided to put space in the sort (" " + e.name).

                  I previously set up the notification like this.

                  dbf20e2d-b40e-4b6e-a7b4-b817ea467ef8-imagem.png

                  48153bc1-15a5-4c4c-99a1-4012b9675c0f-imagem.png

                  And now using sort() and format().

                  5e5689fa-933e-4f5d-b1ef-72fac6331ee7-imagem.png

                  33c3e35a-9458-4e71-918d-85574be7138a-imagem.png

                  I believe we have many ways of doing things, I am looking to improve the use of functions.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #9

                    Since the result of sort() is an array, you can wrap the sort() with join(), no need for an extra variable.

                    FaultOn = join( sort( each id of FaultSensor: do e=getEntity(id), e?.attributes?.x_vera_device?.failed == true ? e.name : null done ), ", " )
                    

                    This would, of course, change the type of FaultOn to a string.

                    If you wanted to preserve the array for other uses, you could also apply the join() to the format() substitution on the array: ${{ format( "Failed devices: {}", join(FaultOn, ", ") ) }}

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    wmarcolinW 2 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      Since the result of sort() is an array, you can wrap the sort() with join(), no need for an extra variable.

                      FaultOn = join( sort( each id of FaultSensor: do e=getEntity(id), e?.attributes?.x_vera_device?.failed == true ? e.name : null done ), ", " )
                      

                      This would, of course, change the type of FaultOn to a string.

                      If you wanted to preserve the array for other uses, you could also apply the join() to the format() substitution on the array: ${{ format( "Failed devices: {}", join(FaultOn, ", ") ) }}

                      wmarcolinW Offline
                      wmarcolinW Offline
                      wmarcolin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @toggledbits nothing like talking to a Jedi master.

                      925c1ae8-b4e2-477a-a38e-a15905b8f0ae-imagem.png

                      I will go with the second option, to preserve the array, I think it may have a better future use.

                      Thanks!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        Since the result of sort() is an array, you can wrap the sort() with join(), no need for an extra variable.

                        FaultOn = join( sort( each id of FaultSensor: do e=getEntity(id), e?.attributes?.x_vera_device?.failed == true ? e.name : null done ), ", " )
                        

                        This would, of course, change the type of FaultOn to a string.

                        If you wanted to preserve the array for other uses, you could also apply the join() to the format() substitution on the array: ${{ format( "Failed devices: {}", join(FaultOn, ", ") ) }}

                        wmarcolinW Offline
                        wmarcolinW Offline
                        wmarcolin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @toggledbits

                        With the new DynamicGroupController option, is it now possible to override all this instruction to use format() directly?

                        bd400cc0-f1ce-4700-b7d3-577a4a8495ac-image.png f79b4c0d-3262-43d7-abf4-3544df1f008e-image.png

                        Or is it necessary to first transform the IDs that appear in the object carrying the name and format, and only then be able to send a text message?

                        Can you help Patrick, I am not really sure now how to go about this.

                        Thanks.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          I will leave this for you to think about, or perhaps some other users can chime in with some assistance. Try some things, observe, fail, and learn. 🙂

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            I will leave this for you to think about, or perhaps some other users can chime in with some assistance. Try some things, observe, fail, and learn. 🙂

                            wmarcolinW Offline
                            wmarcolinW Offline
                            wmarcolin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @toggledbits done 🙂

                            sort( each id in getEntity('groups>low_battery').attributes.sys_group.members: getEntity(id).name + " " + int(getEntity(id).attributes.battery_power.level *100) + "%")

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • LibraSunL Offline
                              LibraSunL Offline
                              LibraSun
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Looks good, though I swear you might be missing a closing parenthesis at the end?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              Recent Topics

                              • HA and AI
                                PablaP
                                Pabla
                                0
                                2
                                55

                              • Self test
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                0
                                3
                                50

                              • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                0
                                6
                                122

                              • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                2
                                99

                              • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                S
                                SweetGenius
                                1
                                1
                                72

                              • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                3
                                1
                                65

                              • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                G
                                gwp1
                                0
                                1
                                78

                              • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                CrilleC
                                Crille
                                0
                                4
                                167

                              • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                therealdbT
                                therealdb
                                0
                                3
                                151

                              • Possible feature request 2?
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                0
                                3
                                131

                              • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                5
                                133
                                82.5k

                              • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                1
                                9
                                428
                              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                              Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Unsolved