Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] Reactor 22067 + Hubitat / InfluxDB feed storing wrong value then stopping on specific attributes
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Issue with MSR UI becoming unresponsive
S
I'm having an issue with MSR's UI being very unresponsive. It started happening a couple days ago and I didn't make any changes that would have caused this except adding some meross lan devices in HA. When I go into an entity action and use the search functionality, it usually will start filtering and then get to a place after a few letters are entered where it will take 30 seconds or more (sometimes minutes) for the UI to show what I am typing. During this time MSR ui is completely unresponsive. I've tried multiple browsers and multiple computers. HA and MSR are both deployed in docker. I have run HTOP on the host and when the problem happens there are no CPU/Memory spikes at all. From a functionality standpoint MSR is working perfectly. This seems to be an UI issue only. Do i need to ditch Docker and run MSR on a Proxmox VM? I have both stand alone Docker and Proxmox environments. I dont mind doing that I just want to be able to use the UI again... Installation method Home Assistant Container Core 2025.7.3 Frontend 20250702.3 nothing crazy in the logs except some openweather map stuff that doesn't make any sense as it is working fine in MSR Any help would be greatly appreciated Reactor latest-25328-b2ed1365 app 25328 configuration from /var/reactor/config NODE_PATH /opt/reactor:/opt/reactor/node_modules [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.843Z <app:null> Reactor build latest-25328-b2ed1365 starting on v24.11.1 /usr/local/bin/node [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.844Z <app:null> Process ID 1 user/group 0/0; docker; platform linux/x64 #161-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 22 14:25:40 UTC 2025; locale (undefined) [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.844Z <app:null> Basedir /opt/reactor; data in /var/reactor/storage [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.844Z <app:null> NODE_PATH=/opt/reactor:/opt/reactor/node_modules [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.865Z <app:null> Resolved timezone=America/New_York, environment TZ=America/New_York; offset minutes from UTC=-300 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.867Z <default:null> Module i18n v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.867Z <app:null> Configured locale (undefined); selected locale(s) en-US.UTF-8 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.879Z <app:null> Loaded locale en-US for en-US [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.879Z <app:null> Local date/time using configured timezone and locale formatting is "11/30/2025, 3:01:53 PM" [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.889Z <Structure:null> Module Structure v25326 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.890Z <Capabilities:null> Module Capabilities v24312 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.904Z <Plugin:null> Module Plugin v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.923Z <Timer:null> Module Timer v25279 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.924Z <TimerBroker:null> Module TimerBroker v25314 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.927Z <Entity:null> Module Entity v25251 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.929Z <Controller:null> Module Controller v25253 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.930Z <AlertManager:null> Module AlertManager v25318 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.937Z <default:null> Module Ruleset v25283 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.937Z <default:null> Module Rulesets v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.942Z <GlobalExpression:null> Module GlobalExpression v25258 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.953Z <Predicate:null> Module Predicate v25328 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.956Z <Rule:null> Module Rule v25323 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.958Z <GlobalReaction:null> Module GlobalReaction v25292 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.959Z <Engine:null> Module Engine v25325 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.964Z <httpapi:null> Module httpapi v25328 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.972Z <wsapi:null> Module wsapi v25328 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.994Z <TaskQueue:null> Module TaskQueue 24138 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.994Z <VeraController:null> Module VeraController v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:54.179Z <HassController:null> Module HassController v25325 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:13.797Z <OWMWeatherController:null> Module OWMWeatherController v25268 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:13.800Z <SystemController:null> Module SystemController v25323 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:13.807Z <MQTTController:null> Module MQTTController v22092 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:20.630Z <OWMWeatherController:CRIT> FetchError: request to https://api.openweathermap.org/data/2.5/weather?lat=xxxxxxxxxx&lon=-xxxxxxxxx&appid=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&units=standard&_r=1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxfailed, reason: [-] FetchError: request to https://api.openweathermap.org/data/2.5/weather?lat=xxxxxxxxxxx&lon=-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&appid=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&units=standard&_r=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxfailed, reason: at ClientRequest.<anonymous> (/opt/reactor/node_modules/node-fetch/lib/index.js:1501:11) at ClientRequest.emit (node:events:508:28) at ClientRequest.emit (node:domain:489:12) at emitErrorEvent (node:_http_client:108:11) at TLSSocket.socketErrorListener (node:_http_client:575:5) at TLSSocket.emit (node:events:508:28) at TLSSocket.emit (node:domain:489:12) at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8) at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3) at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:89:21
Multi-System Reactor
Date/time condition
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] Reactor 22067 + Hubitat / InfluxDB feed storing wrong value then stopping on specific attributes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
6 Posts 2 Posters 776 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alan_F
    wrote on last edited by Alan_F
    #1

    Reactor latest-22067 on Raspberry Pi, Influx DB 1.8, both in Docker. Controlling two separate Hubitat C7s.

    I am storing data for CPU load and free memory from the Hub Information device on the Hubitat Hub in the Influx database so that I can graph them.

    I noticed that for the last two days I was not getting the free memory on my graph. (I don't currently graph the CPU data.) When I restarted Reactor I got two data points and then nothing for a while.

    I looked at the Hubitat Hub Information device and could see the numbers changing there. I also watched the entities screen in Reactor and could see it flash green when it updated. Both the Hubitat device and the Reactor entities matched and were updating.

    However the Influx database stopped getting new data. What I see in Grafana matches what I see when I directly query the database in a terminal window, so it is not an issue with Grafana.

    The Hub Temperature data is updating in the database every time it changes. It is not one of the extra attributes that I added. It is logged as a regular temperature_sensor.

    This is the relevant portion of reactor.yaml:

          select_capabilities:   
            light_sensor: true   
            x_hubitat_Thermostat:
              attributes:
                - coolingSetpoint
                - heatingSetpoint
                - thermostatFanMode
                - thermostatMode
                - thermostatOperatingState
                - thermostatSetpoint
                - temperature
            x_hubitat_extra_attributes:
              attributes:
                - cpu5Min
                - cpuPct
                - freeMemory
            wx:
              attributes:
                - temperature
                - humidity
                - cloud_cover
    

    This chart from Grafana illustrates what is happening. The data points circled in red are the pairs of points from two restarts of Reactor. The yellow line and green line represent the two separate Hubitat hubs that I'm connected to. The blue line is the CPU temperature from one of the hubs.

    ac19c0aa-d9f5-4b82-9f8d-05d6ea2acc9e-image.png

    Here is the same graph from a little later to show the CPU temp is continuing to update, but the free memory is not:

    4014600c-8501-4e58-b13c-987b5a6e9502-image.png

    Again, the free memory is changing in the entities screen every time it changes in the hub, but the data isn't being saved to InfluxDB after the first two data points.

    Looking at the most recent documentation, I saw the format for the attributes was different, using a trailing ":true" intead of a leading "-", so I tried switching my reactor.yaml to match. The section now reads:

        x_hubitat_extra_attributes:
          attributes:
            cpu5Min: true
            cpuPct: true
            freeMemory: true
    

    I restarted Reactor and got the same result.

    Final observation... the second data point in each pair is incorrect...

    After the last restart I pulled the data from the database.

    time                controller    cpu5Min cpuPct entity            freeMemory name
    ----                ----------    ------- ------ ------            ---------- ----
    1646918194198000000 hubitat_11705 0.07    1.75   hubitat_11705>130 526192     Hub information
    1646918045910000000 hubitat       0.23    5.75   hubitat>483       324088     Hub information
    1646918032985000000 hubitat_11705 0.07    1.75   hubitat_11705>130 526192     Hub information
    

    The first and third lines are relevant here. They are both for the 'hubitat_11705' hub. They show the free memory as 526192 on both lines.

    But when the second data point was saved to the database the reactor entity showed:

    x_hubitat_extra_attributes.freeMemory="525728"
    

    and the Hubitat device shows:

    60812ba1-6200-4e3e-8ee5-2ebb0346d487-image.png

    So the second data point should have been saved in the database as '525728' but instead it saved the previous value of 526192.

    Looking back at the annotated Grafana graph I can see the same thing happened with the earlier pairs of points... the second point was the same value as the first, and then there was no more data logged until the next Reactor restart.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Online
      toggledbitsT Online
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Checking the logs would be useful here (again: not seeing what you expect? Look at the logs.). Also you haven't shown your queries in Grafana. If you've got mean() or other aggregates in the query, or anything in group by, the presentation is not a representation of the raw feed. Remove all aggregates and groups to make sure you are looking at the raw data. Can be very confusing otherwise. On the road, won't be much responding to this more until I return around 3/20.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        Checking the logs would be useful here (again: not seeing what you expect? Look at the logs.). Also you haven't shown your queries in Grafana. If you've got mean() or other aggregates in the query, or anything in group by, the presentation is not a representation of the raw feed. Remove all aggregates and groups to make sure you are looking at the raw data. Can be very confusing otherwise. On the road, won't be much responding to this more until I return around 3/20.

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Alan_F
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits I wasn't expecting a reply until you got back from vacation and handled other higher priority things, but I'll try to add the additional information now:

        What I'm expecting is that each time the data on the Hubitat Hub Information device changes, that the values for that I added in my reactor.yaml file (cpu5Min, cpuPct, freeMemory) will be written to the influx database. This is what it was doing up until two days ago, and I think the change in behavior matches up to when I upgraded to 22067.

        The Grafana queries are not using aggregates, nor was the direct query I ran from Influx via the command line, but I should have posted the query I used to pull the data. Here is data I just pulled directly from Influx using a command prompt, filtering on only one hub to make it simpler:

        > select * from x_hubitat_extra_attributes where entity = 'hubitat>483' order by time desc limit 6
        name: x_hubitat_extra_attributes
        time                controller cpu5Min cpuPct entity      freeMemory name
        ----                ---------- ------- ------ ------      ---------- ----
        1646918045910000000 hubitat    0.23    5.75   hubitat>483 324088     Hub information
        1646918032714000000 hubitat    0.23    5.75   hubitat>483 324088     Hub information
        1646916245576000000 hubitat            3      hubitat>483 325848     Hub information
        1646916119494000000 hubitat            3      hubitat>483 325848     Hub information
        1646914445106000000 hubitat    0.11    2.75   hubitat>483 325904     Hub information
        1646914238104000000 hubitat    0.11    2.75   hubitat>483 325904     Hub information
        

        Starting from the bottom of the list with the oldest two records, they are about 4 minutes apart but show the exact same numbers.

        The next two records again are about 4 minutes apart and show the same numbers.

        The top two records are about 1 minute apart and show the same numbers.

        Between each pair of logged values I restarted Reactor. On the last set - the top two in this list - I was watching the Reactor Entities screen and saw that the Hub Information entity updated at the time the last data point was stored, but the values were NOT 0.23, 5.75, and 324088.

        I can upload logs when you get back. I looked at the times in the log when this data was stored and I don't see anything related to Influx. I do see the updates coming from the Hub Information device.

        I was able to find the logs corresponding to the two records in the middle (showing 325848 as the freeMemory)

        The timestamp on the older one converts to: Thursday, March 10, 2022 12:41:59.494 PM

        In the logs I find the value for the freeMemory a few minutes earlier at 12:39:05Z. I think the time discrepancy is because I restarted Reactor between when the value was logged and when it got written to the database. When Reactor started up, it wrote the most recent value to Influx.

        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:39:05.568Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:641> HubitatController#hubitat received DEVICE event [Object]{ "source": "DEVICE", "name": "freeMemory", "displayName": "Hub information", "value": "325848", "type": "null", "unit": "KB", "deviceId": 483, "hubId": 0, "installedAppId": 0, "descriptionText": "null" }
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:39:05.569Z <HubitatController#hubitat:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat fast update Entity#hubitat>483 event freeMemory="325848"
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:39:05.569Z <HubitatController#hubitat:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat fast update Entity#hubitat>483 event freeMemory="325848"
        
        
        

        The next record from the database with the same values has a timestamp that converts to Thursday, March 10, 2022 12:44:05.576 PM

        That matches up in the logs with this:

        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:44:05.632Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:641> HubitatController#hubitat received DEVICE event [Object]{ "source": "DEVICE", "name": "freeMemory", "displayName": "Hub information", "value": "325884", "type": "null", "unit": "KB", "deviceId": 483, "hubId": 0, "installedAppId": 0, "descriptionText": "null" }
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:44:05.633Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:643> HubitatController#hubitat ws DEVICE event device 483 freeMemory="325884"
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:44:05.633Z <HubitatController#hubitat:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat fast update Entity#hubitat>483 event freeMemory="325884"
        

        So at 12:44:05 I'm expecting the freeMemory written to the database to be 325884, but the database query returned 325848, the previous value from a few minutes earlier in the logs.

        The next instance of the hub freeMemory in the logs is at 12:49:05Z

        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:49:05.763Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:641> HubitatController#hubitat received DEVICE event [Object]{ "source": "DEVICE", "name": "freeMemory", "displayName": "Hub information", "value": "325664", "type": "null", "unit": "KB", "deviceId": 483, "hubId": 0, "installedAppId": 0, "descriptionText": "null" }
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:49:05.764Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:643> HubitatController#hubitat ws DEVICE event device 483 freeMemory="325664"
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:49:05.765Z <HubitatController#hubitat:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat fast update Entity#hubitat>483 event freeMemory="325664"
        

        There is no corresponding record in the Influx database. I would expect an entry with freeMemory of 325664.

        There are additional logs showing the Hubitat Hub Information device updating values every few minutes, but nothing was added to the database until after 1:13:52Z when I restarted Reactor. Then I got the two entries showing a freeMemory of 324088, but as with the middle two record in the query results, the second one of the pair is wrong. The last (top of the list) data in the database shows freeMemory of 324088 and its timestamp converts to Thursday, March 10, 2022 1:14:05.910 PM

        The log shows:

        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T13:14:05.943Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:641> HubitatController#hubitat received DEVICE event [Object]{ "source": "DEVICE", "name": "freeMemory", "displayName": "Hub information", "value": "323712", "type": "null", "unit": "KB", "deviceId": 483, "hubId": 0, "installedAppId": 0, "descriptionText": "null" }
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T13:14:05.945Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:643> HubitatController#hubitat ws DEVICE event device 483 freeMemory="323712"
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T13:14:05.945Z <HubitatController#hubitat:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat fast update Entity#hubitat>483 event freeMemory="323712"
        

        I would have expected the database entry at 13:14:05Z to show 323712 as the freeMemory value.

        I haven't restarted Reactor since then, and as I type this several hours later, no new data for these attributes has made it into the database.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Online
          toggledbitsT Online
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          I'm not quite out the door yet; I was just leaving ample room for packing, and whatever support my older son needed for a final exam he was taking today.

          So I see two things contributing here:

          1. There is an opportunity for a value change that occurs during a loss of connection to the hub and a reconnect to be missed; that is, if Reactor stays running, but the hub is rebooted, Reactor may miss a value that changes (and free memory would almost certainly change there). This would be due to the new fast update behavior, so a new issue. That will take a code fix, which I can safely and quickly make in the next hour or so.

          2. The event websocket is sending all values for updated (Hubitat) attributes as strings. That's disappointing. That will make InfluxDB choke, because the values given by Maker API, which are the first values inserted into the database, will be numbers, thereby cementing the type for that field in InfluxDB. Thereafter, the attempt to insert a string will fail because the data types don't match. This is a chronic InfluxDB problem, and I actually made some code changes to the integration about a month ago to help get around that problem when it comes up. So, you will need to modify your InfluxDB plugin config to look more like this:

                  x_hubitat_extra_attributes:
                    attributes:
                      cpu5Min:
                        type: number
                      cpuPct:
                        type: number
                      freeMemory:
                        type: number
                      uptime:
                        type: number
          

          This will make the plugin coerce (if it can) each value to its "proper" type before handing it off to InfluxDB. You can do this now, and it should have an immediate effect on your updates. The code change mentioned above (item 1) handles a rarer circumstance that you could also see, but is probably not the major contributor to what is going on for you today. Try this change out, and see if it helps. I expect it will. If so, you may want to consider adding this to other attributes being exported to InfluxDB.

          I can do more in HubitatController to make sure the types are properly converted when they come in from the event websocket, but that's a bigger change that I'm reticent to make right now. The code change to fix the restart update is small, so I'm more confident in making that change today, but I'll leave the rest for later. The type configuration should work around that issue pretty effectively until I get back.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Alan_F
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Just realized I was only looking in the Hubitat.log file, which we turned on while trying to troubleshoot something else, and not in the reactor.log file... Ugh... need more coffee before trying to troubleshoot. Apologies for making this more difficult by missing that. In the reactor.log files I found the Influx errors saying that the database field was type 'float' and the data from the hub was 'string'. If I had posted that at the top of this thread, it would be a much shorter read.

            After changing the attributes as you showed above I'm now getting correct data into the database and I'm not seeing errors in reactor.log.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Online
              toggledbitsT Online
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              What you posted was great, and I was able to see the string data in the events, so clue attained, and that's a win. We'll fix it right when I get back.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              Recent Topics

              • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                CatmanV2C
                CatmanV2
                0
                9
                362

              • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                toggledbitsT
                toggledbits
                0
                4
                114

              • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                therealdbT
                therealdb
                1
                8
                268

              • Difficulty defining repeating annual period
                G
                gwp1
                0
                5
                68

              • Need help with sequence
                therealdbT
                therealdb
                0
                3
                41

              • Possible feature request?
                therealdbT
                therealdb
                0
                5
                151

              • Copying a global reaction
                tunnusT
                tunnus
                0
                1
                41

              • Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
                CatmanV2C
                CatmanV2
                0
                11
                321

              • Time series documentation
                tunnusT
                tunnus
                0
                11
                379

              • MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
                CatmanV2C
                CatmanV2
                0
                3
                148

              • Reset a delay
                CatmanV2C
                CatmanV2
                0
                8
                211
              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
              Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Unsolved