Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. MSR setup for http request (today's date)
Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

MSR setup for http request (today's date)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
15 Posts 2 Posters 1.9k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

    The HTTP Request action can store the response into a variable (global or rule/local) that you can then use to access the data in other expressions. If the server declares that the response is JSON data, it will automatically be parsed to an object. From there, using your example, you can access the data in the object as usual. For example, in your example data, if we stored that in a variable called "lastquery",. you could access the "unit_rate" data in the response with lastquery.unit_rate.

    T Offline
    T Offline
    Talisker
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @toggledbits I am not sure if the returned result is JSON? I can obviously paste the response into a JSON formatter but I guess that is not the same thing? The result is unfortunately not just the 'latest' (today's rate), but a whole history of days which means I'd have to pick out the values under each day or today '2022-07-25'

    https://octopus.energy/api/v1/tracker/G-1R-SILVER-2017-1-M/daily/past/90/1/?format=json

    Vera plus user. MSR user on Raspberry PI 4. Running MSR version 23049 in Docker

    toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Talisker

      @toggledbits I am not sure if the returned result is JSON? I can obviously paste the response into a JSON formatter but I guess that is not the same thing? The result is unfortunately not just the 'latest' (today's rate), but a whole history of days which means I'd have to pick out the values under each day or today '2022-07-25'

      https://octopus.energy/api/v1/tracker/G-1R-SILVER-2017-1-M/daily/past/90/1/?format=json

      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #4

      @talisker That's JSON. It's doable, but not trivial for the new players.

      I would first set up a Rule to query the server each day at a particular time. That rule would use an HTTP Request action to store the response into a global variable (let's call it energy_data). You need to create the global variable first, just leave the expression blank.

      Then make another global expression to fetch and hold the rate for today from the response by using the first statement to go through energy_data.periods until it finds the entry with date matching today's date... it would look something like this

      first entry in energy_data.periods with entry.date == strftime( "%F" ): entry.unit_rate
      

      (assuming unit_rate is the correct key/field in the entry; if not, just use the correct key name).

      You can then create whatever other rule you need based on the rate fetched.

      I tested this; works fine. Here's the rule that does the fetch every day at midnight:

      f3f53e15-8289-4b02-a399-82f6738640a5-image.png

      And here is what the expressions look like:

      31e9b926-ba4c-4812-a6cd-f4720ba723eb-image.png

      You will also need to set http_request_action_maxresponse in the engine section of your reactor.yaml file to a value large enough to contain the result. I just set it to 256 (units are kilobytes). It appears that the structure of the URL may offer some control over the number of entries returned, so you might consider using that to reduce the overhead.

      Edit: sure enough, if you change the "90" in the URL to a smaller number, it returns that many days of info, so use something like 7 and you'll reduce the query overhead considerably. You really only need today's anyway, right? (so maybe even 1 or 2 would work?)

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        @talisker That's JSON. It's doable, but not trivial for the new players.

        I would first set up a Rule to query the server each day at a particular time. That rule would use an HTTP Request action to store the response into a global variable (let's call it energy_data). You need to create the global variable first, just leave the expression blank.

        Then make another global expression to fetch and hold the rate for today from the response by using the first statement to go through energy_data.periods until it finds the entry with date matching today's date... it would look something like this

        first entry in energy_data.periods with entry.date == strftime( "%F" ): entry.unit_rate
        

        (assuming unit_rate is the correct key/field in the entry; if not, just use the correct key name).

        You can then create whatever other rule you need based on the rate fetched.

        I tested this; works fine. Here's the rule that does the fetch every day at midnight:

        f3f53e15-8289-4b02-a399-82f6738640a5-image.png

        And here is what the expressions look like:

        31e9b926-ba4c-4812-a6cd-f4720ba723eb-image.png

        You will also need to set http_request_action_maxresponse in the engine section of your reactor.yaml file to a value large enough to contain the result. I just set it to 256 (units are kilobytes). It appears that the structure of the URL may offer some control over the number of entries returned, so you might consider using that to reduce the overhead.

        Edit: sure enough, if you change the "90" in the URL to a smaller number, it returns that many days of info, so use something like 7 and you'll reduce the query overhead considerably. You really only need today's anyway, right? (so maybe even 1 or 2 would work?)

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Talisker
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        @toggledbits thank you once again! Very clear instructions. I am now up an running and have opened up new opportunites to extend my automation.

        Vera plus user. MSR user on Raspberry PI 4. Running MSR version 23049 in Docker

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • tunnusT tunnus referenced this topic on
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          Talisker
          wrote on last edited by Talisker
          #6

          I have made an http request and get the following JSON response which I have stored in a global variable gas_consumption (like the example above). See below.

          I have then tried to the following expression to extract the consumption value:

          0818a20e-2700-4a4c-a9be-47a64f452051-image.png

          Clearly the returned data "results" is not published for today (strftime( "%F) i.e. 4/9/2022.

          How do I extract the gas consumption for a particular date?
          How do I extract yesterday's gas consumption (in the case of the response below 3/9/2022)?

          ===group

          {
          	"count": 482,
          	"next": "https://api.octopus.energy/v1/gas-meter-points/xxxxxxxxxxx/meters/xxxxxxxxxxx/consumption/?format=json&group_by=day&page=2&page_size=10",
          	"previous": null,
          	"results": [{
          		"consumption": 0.0,
          		"interval_start": "2022-09-03T00:00:00+01:00",
          		"interval_end": "2022-09-03T01:00:00+01:00"
          	}, {
          		"consumption": 1.077,
          		"interval_start": "2022-09-02T00:00:00+01:00",
          		"interval_end": "2022-09-03T00:00:00+01:00"
          	}, {
          		"consumption": 0.669,
          		"interval_start": "2022-09-01T00:00:00+01:00",
          		"interval_end": "2022-09-02T00:00:00+01:00"
          	}, {
          		"consumption": 0.761,
          		"interval_start": "2022-08-31T00:00:00+01:00",
          		"interval_end": "2022-09-01T00:00:00+01:00"
          	}, {
          		"consumption": 0.614,
          		"interval_start": "2022-08-30T01:00:00+01:00",
          		"interval_end": "2022-08-31T00:00:00+01:00"
          	}, {
          		"consumption": 0.0,
          		"interval_start": "2022-08-29T00:00:00+01:00",
          		"interval_end": "2022-08-29T01:00:00+01:00"
          	}, {
          		"consumption": 0.569,
          		"interval_start": "2022-08-28T00:00:00+01:00",
          		"interval_end": "2022-08-29T00:00:00+01:00"
          	}, {
          		"consumption": 0.0,
          		"interval_start": "2022-08-27T00:00:00+01:00",
          		"interval_end": "2022-08-28T00:00:00+01:00"
          	}, {
          		"consumption": 0.455,
          		"interval_start": "2022-08-26T00:00:00+01:00",
          		"interval_end": "2022-08-27T00:00:00+01:00"
          	}, {
          		"consumption": 0.681,
          		"interval_start": "2022-08-25T00:00:00+01:00",
          		"interval_end": "2022-08-26T00:00:00+01:00"
          	}]
          }
          
          ===

          Vera plus user. MSR user on Raspberry PI 4. Running MSR version 23049 in Docker

          T 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #7

            You are on the right track. The problem with what you are doing is:

            1. Your are comparing entry.date in the loop, but date is not a field in those structures. I believe you mean to use interval_start. Also, gas_consumption used to get the result is not the correct name/key either.
            2. If you were to create a separate test variable using strftime("%F") as the entirety of its expression, I think you will quickly see the problem with the value being generated vs what you are trying to compare it to. I've done that below. See the problem? I'll leave it to you for the moment to come up with a fix.

            8985d2ac-5dbc-4088-9f27-f2799bf12a90-image.png

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Talisker

              I have made an http request and get the following JSON response which I have stored in a global variable gas_consumption (like the example above). See below.

              I have then tried to the following expression to extract the consumption value:

              0818a20e-2700-4a4c-a9be-47a64f452051-image.png

              Clearly the returned data "results" is not published for today (strftime( "%F) i.e. 4/9/2022.

              How do I extract the gas consumption for a particular date?
              How do I extract yesterday's gas consumption (in the case of the response below 3/9/2022)?

              ===group

              {
              	"count": 482,
              	"next": "https://api.octopus.energy/v1/gas-meter-points/xxxxxxxxxxx/meters/xxxxxxxxxxx/consumption/?format=json&group_by=day&page=2&page_size=10",
              	"previous": null,
              	"results": [{
              		"consumption": 0.0,
              		"interval_start": "2022-09-03T00:00:00+01:00",
              		"interval_end": "2022-09-03T01:00:00+01:00"
              	}, {
              		"consumption": 1.077,
              		"interval_start": "2022-09-02T00:00:00+01:00",
              		"interval_end": "2022-09-03T00:00:00+01:00"
              	}, {
              		"consumption": 0.669,
              		"interval_start": "2022-09-01T00:00:00+01:00",
              		"interval_end": "2022-09-02T00:00:00+01:00"
              	}, {
              		"consumption": 0.761,
              		"interval_start": "2022-08-31T00:00:00+01:00",
              		"interval_end": "2022-09-01T00:00:00+01:00"
              	}, {
              		"consumption": 0.614,
              		"interval_start": "2022-08-30T01:00:00+01:00",
              		"interval_end": "2022-08-31T00:00:00+01:00"
              	}, {
              		"consumption": 0.0,
              		"interval_start": "2022-08-29T00:00:00+01:00",
              		"interval_end": "2022-08-29T01:00:00+01:00"
              	}, {
              		"consumption": 0.569,
              		"interval_start": "2022-08-28T00:00:00+01:00",
              		"interval_end": "2022-08-29T00:00:00+01:00"
              	}, {
              		"consumption": 0.0,
              		"interval_start": "2022-08-27T00:00:00+01:00",
              		"interval_end": "2022-08-28T00:00:00+01:00"
              	}, {
              		"consumption": 0.455,
              		"interval_start": "2022-08-26T00:00:00+01:00",
              		"interval_end": "2022-08-27T00:00:00+01:00"
              	}, {
              		"consumption": 0.681,
              		"interval_start": "2022-08-25T00:00:00+01:00",
              		"interval_end": "2022-08-26T00:00:00+01:00"
              	}]
              }
              
              ===
              T Offline
              T Offline
              Talisker
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Background to the question
              I've been experimenting a little and I need help. If I use the following expression:

              03c304e5-fbfb-4895-9147-7ef0ea1d6592-image.png

              I get the correct response (i.e. today's day number '16'th).

              I can use this in a HTTP requst to download some tarrif information via an API from my energy supplier - i.e. today's gas unit rate tariff

              What I'd like to do

              I would like to download tomorrow's gas unit rate tariff. To do this I need to set up and expression with today's date + 1 day (in the case of my example expression above that would be '17' (today being the 16th).

              Question: How do I take today's date and add 1 day - so that I can make the HTTP request for tomorrow's information?

              Any guidance or suggestions would be appreciated.

              Vera plus user. MSR user on Raspberry PI 4. Running MSR version 23049 in Docker

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Read the docs for Expressions (the Date/Time handling section in particular) and familiarize yourself with the tools available. I'll give you a couple of pointers:

                The time() function can take arguments in several forms to build any reasonable date. The dateparts() function will return any timestamp or the current time/date as its components (hour, minute, year, month, day, etc., and better than using strftime() for the purpose).

                Special hint: if you tell time() to make a timestamp for July 32, 2022, it will give you a timestamp for August 1, 2022 without complaint.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                T 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  Read the docs for Expressions (the Date/Time handling section in particular) and familiarize yourself with the tools available. I'll give you a couple of pointers:

                  The time() function can take arguments in several forms to build any reasonable date. The dateparts() function will return any timestamp or the current time/date as its components (hour, minute, year, month, day, etc., and better than using strftime() for the purpose).

                  Special hint: if you tell time() to make a timestamp for July 32, 2022, it will give you a timestamp for August 1, 2022 without complaint.

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  Talisker
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  @toggledbits Thanks for the prompts, following which I made some progress:
                  6f968ae5-b0b6-4d54-9b46-6441c90cf73e-image.png

                  I have Test51 which contains tomorrow's date, but I am struggling to get the time in a sting representation. I am trying to represent the day in Test53 expression but I have a syntax error.

                  I would appreciate some more guidance.

                  Vera plus user. MSR user on Raspberry PI 4. Running MSR version 23049 in Docker

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #11

                    THAT is the proper use of strftime(). The time is the (optional) second argument (i.e. you don't write Test53.strftime(...), you write strftime( "%F %T", Test53)). Again, read the docs. strftime() is a Reactor-specific function, documented lower down on the page.

                    Edit: specific correction for clarity.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      THAT is the proper use of strftime(). The time is the (optional) second argument (i.e. you don't write Test53.strftime(...), you write strftime( "%F %T", Test53)). Again, read the docs. strftime() is a Reactor-specific function, documented lower down on the page.

                      Edit: specific correction for clarity.

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Talisker
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @toggledbits Thanks for your pointers. Partial success:
                      6df6b31f-039d-4fd6-9c8d-15784218cbe4-image.png

                      However, the expressions do not update! I use Tomorrow_Date in a Rule (HTTP Request):

                      https://api.octopus.energy/v1/products/SILVER-22-04-25/gas-tariffs/G-1R-SILVER-22-04-25-M/standard-unit-rates/?page_size=10&period_from=https://api.octohttps://api.octopus.energy/v1/products/SILVER-22-04-25/gas-tariffs/G-1R-SILVER-22-04-25-M/standard-unit-rates/?page_size=10&period_from=**${{Tomorrow_Date}}**&order_by=period

                      Is there a way to force an update on selected expressions, say at a set time every day?

                      Vera plus user. MSR user on Raspberry PI 4. Running MSR version 23049 in Docker

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Can you show your rule?

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                          Can you show your rule?

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          Talisker
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          @toggledbits 2aae465d-b404-43f1-babe-0f12435a73eb-image.png

                          No Reset Reaction or Local Expressions are set.

                          The request URL is:
                          https://api.octopus.energy/v1/products/SILVER-22-04-25/gas-tariffs/G-1R-SILVER-22-04-25-M/standard-unit-rates/?page_size=10&period_from=https://api.octohttps://api.octopus.energy/v1/products/SILVER-22-04-25/gas-tariffs/G-1R-SILVER-22-04-25-M/standard-unit-rates/?page_size=10&period_from=${{Tomorrow_Date}}&order_by=period

                          Vera plus user. MSR user on Raspberry PI 4. Running MSR version 23049 in Docker

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbits
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            OK. Move your global expressions into your rule so they are rule-based expressions. They will update each time the Interval triggers.

                            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            Recent Topics

                            • Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                              CrilleC
                              Crille
                              0
                              1
                              22

                            • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                              G
                              gwp1
                              0
                              6
                              65

                            • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              5
                              129
                              73.6k

                            • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              1
                              1
                              45

                            • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                              M
                              mgvra
                              1
                              3
                              112

                            • Script action and custom timers
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              4
                              132

                            • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                              CatmanV2C
                              CatmanV2
                              0
                              12
                              354

                            • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                              akbooerA
                              akbooer
                              1
                              2
                              108

                            • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                              CrilleC
                              Crille
                              0
                              6
                              145

                            • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              17
                              432

                            • Shelly Wall Display XL
                              akbooerA
                              akbooer
                              2
                              9
                              782

                            • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              26
                              784
                            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                            Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Unsolved