Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating
Errors after updating to MQTTController build 25139
tunnusT
I'm running MSR build 25139 on Docker, using MQTT controller 24293, and everything working as expected. But if I try to upgrade to MQTTController build 25139, I'm getting the following errors on MSR UI: An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.god Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.green Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.red Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto run" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.pump Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa watchdog" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.status Last 11:20:37 My MQTT configuration (local_mqtt_devices.yaml) for the related entity is: layzspa_message: type: ValueSensor capabilities: ["temperature_sensor", "value_sensor", "power_sensor"] primary_attribute: power_sensor.value events: "layzspa/message": "power_sensor.value": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.PWR )' expr: "float(payload.PWR)" "value_sensor.air": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AIR )' expr: "float(payload.AIR)" "value_sensor.pump": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.FLT )' expr: "float(payload.FLT)" "value_sensor.god": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GOD )' expr: "float(payload.GOD)" "value_sensor.lock": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.LCK )' expr: "float(payload.LCK)" "value_sensor.unit": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.UNT )' expr: "float(payload.UNT)" "value_sensor.error": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.ERR )' expr: "float(payload.ERR)" "temperature_sensor.green": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GRN )' expr: "float(payload.GRN)" "temperature_sensor.red": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.RED )' expr: "float(payload.RED)" "temperature_sensor.target": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TGT )' expr: "float(payload.TGT)" "temperature_sensor.value": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TMP )' expr: "float(payload.TMP)" "temperature_sensor.virtual": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.VTM )' expr: "round(float(payload.VTM), 1)" "temperature_sensor.ambient": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AMB )' expr: "float(payload.AMB)" "layzspa/Status": "value_sensor.status": if_expr: '! isnull( payload )' expr: "payload" "layzspa/button": "value_sensor.button": if_expr: '! isnull( payload )' expr: "payload" and in reactor.yaml I have: "layzspa_states": name: "Lay-Z-Spa States" friendly_name: 'Lay-Z-Spa States' include: layzspa_message I realize my MQTT configuration might be a bit unorthodox, but could there still be something unintentional in the latest MQTTController build? If needed, I can provide detailed logs.
Multi-System Reactor
🎉 My very first MSR controller: OpenSprinkler
therealdbT
Since today is my birthday - and I still pretend to be unconventional - I'm giving away a present to this wonderful community and I'm releasing my first OpenSprinkler controller for MSR. It was real fun to code it - and while it's still WIP, it seems to work OK for me. It's polling-based at the moment, but I'll add support for updates via MQTT very soon (it's already partially coded). Get it at (install is similar to MQTTController and such): https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-opensprinkler Feel free to try it. It's beta software, but it's stable. I'll update it weekly until all the tasks from my todo list are empty. Since I've learnt a lot from this controller, I'll explore new controllers soon.
Multi-System Reactor
Set Reaction > Script Action
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
T
Good day all, I'm in the process of trying to shut down my 10 year old Linux home server that served many purposes, but primarily it's what I used for my NAS/Plex Media server. I migrated the NAS aspect of the server in November of last year to a true NAS solution (Ubiquti UNAS Pro), which is rack mount and much more efficient than my old tower, which it's only side benefit was heating my home office during the winter. Unfortunately it also means heating my home office during the summer, which were about to be in full swing. I have two things running on this 10 year old server at this point. MSR and pi-hole. I'm running Plex Media Server on Fedora Workstation in Podman on mini PC, which is much more energy efficient than my old tower. My next step is to migrate MSR. I know there are images of MSR out there, and creating it is well documented. I'm going to be using Podman instead of Docker for various reasons, but they work very similar. What I don't know, is what I need to do to migrate my existing Bare Metal installation over to a container. Has anyone done this? Any advice?
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Organizing/ structuring rule sets and rules
R
Hi guys, Just wondering how you guys organize your rule sets and rules. I wish I had an extra layer to have some more granularity, but my feature request was not popular. Maybe there are better ways to organize my rule sets. I use the rule sets now primarily for rooms. So a rule set per room. But maybe grouping by functionality works better. Any examples/ suggestions would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Moving MSR from a QNAP container to RP 5 - some issues
Tom_DT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Widget deletion does not work and landing page (status) is empy
M
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Need help reducing false positive notifications
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deleting widgets
tunnusT
Hopefully a trivial question, but how do you delete widgets in a status page? Using build 22266
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT configuration question
tunnusT
I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file x_mqtt_device: set_speed: arguments: speed: type: str topic: "command/%friendly_name%" payload: type: json expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }' While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?
Multi-System Reactor
System Configuration Check - time is offset
F
Hi! I get this message when I'm on the status tab: System Configuration Check The time on this system and on the Reactor host are significantly different. This may be due to incorrect system configuration on either or both. Please check the configuration of both systems. The host reports 2025-04-01T15:29:29.252Z; browser reports 2025-04-01T15:29:40.528Z; difference 11.276 seconds. I have MSR installed as a docker on my Home Assistant Blue / Hardkernel ODROID-N2/N2+. MSR version is latest-25082-3c348de6. HA versions are: Core 2025.3.4 Supervisor 2025.03.4 Operating System 15.1 I have restarted HA as well as MSR multiple times. This message didn´t show two weeks ago. Don´t know if it have anything to do with the latest MSR version. Do anyone know what I can try? Thanks in advance! Let's Be Careful Out There (Hill Street reference...) /Fanan
Multi-System Reactor
Programmatically capture HTTP Request action status code or error
therealdbT
I have a very strange situation, where if InfluxDB restarts, other containers may fail when restarting at the same time (under not easy to understand circumstances), and InfluxDB remains unreachable (and these containers crashes). I need to reboot these containers in an exact order, after rebooting InfluxDB. While I understand what's going on, I need a way to reliable determine that InfluxDB is not reachable and these containers are not reachable, in order to identify this situation and manually check what's going on - and, maybe, in the future, automatically restart them if needed. So, I was looking at HTTP Request action, but I need to capture the HTTP response code, instead of the response (becase if ping is OK, InfluxDB will reply with a 204), and, potentially, a way to programmatically detect that it's failing to get the response. While I could write a custom HTTP controller for this or a custom HTTP virtual device, I was wondering if this is somewhat on you roadmap @toggledbits Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
ZwaveJSUI - RGBWW BULB - Warm/Cold White interfered with RGB settings - Bulb doesn't change color if in WarmWhite state.
N
Hi , I'm on -Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25067-62e21a2d -Docker on Synology NAS -ZWaveJSUI 9.31.0.6c80945 Problem with ZwaveJSUI: When I try to change color to a bulb RGBWW, it doesn't change to the RGB color and the bulb remains warm or cold white. I tryed with Zipato RGBW Bulb V2 RGBWE2, Hank Bulb HKZW-RGB01, Aentec 6 A-ZWA002, so seems that it happens with all RGBWW bulb with reactor/zwavejsui. I'm using from reator the entity action: "rgb_color.set" and "rgb_color.set_rgb". After I send the reactor command, It changes in zwavejsui the rgb settings but doesn't put the white channel to "0", so the prevalent channel remains warm/cold White and the bulb doesn't change into the rgb color. This is the status of the bulb in zwavejsui after "rgb_color.set" (235,33,33,) and the bulb is still warmWhite. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor={"warmWhite":204,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} The "cold white" and "warm white" settings interfer with the rgb color settings. Reactor can change bulb colors with rgb_color set — (value, ui8, 0x000000 to 0xffffff) or rgb_color set_rgb — (red, green, blue, all ui1, 0 to 255) but if warm or cold white are not to "0", zwavejsui doesn't change them and I can't find a way to change into rgb or from rgb back to warm white. So if I use from reactor: rgb_color set_rgb — (235,33,33) in zwavejsui I have x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: targetColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: targetColor 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: currentColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: currentColor In zwavejsui, the bulb changes rgb set but warm White remains to "204" and the bulb remais on warm White channel bacause is prevalent on rgb set. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_0=204 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_1=0 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_2=235 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_3=33 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_4=33 Is it possible to targetColor also for "warmWhite" and "coldWhite" and have something similar to this? x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"warmWhite":0,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} Thanks in advance.
Multi-System Reactor
Problem with simultaneous notifications.
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Problem after upgrading to 25067
R
MSR had been running fine, but I decided to follow the message to upgrade to 25067. Since the upgrade, I have received the message "Controller "<name>" (HubitatController hubitat2) could not be loaded at startup. Its ID is not unique." MSR throws the message on every restart. Has anyone else encountered this problem? I am running MSR on a Raspberry Pi4 connecting to two Hubitat units over an OpenVPN tunnel. One C8 and a C8 Pro. Both are up-to-date. It appears that despite the error message that MSR may be operating properly.
Multi-System Reactor
Global expressions not always evaluated
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression evaluation
V
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
solved
44 Posts 3 Posters 3.7k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Also, did you restart Reactor after adding the node?

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      Also, did you restart Reactor after adding the node?

      G Offline
      G Offline
      gwp1
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      @toggledbits Answering in reverse order: yes on restart of MSR (multiple times). Also reloaded the HA ZWaveJS plugin as well as restarted HA as a whole.

      The the first ask:
      647.yaml

      manufacturer_id: 647
      manufacturer_name: "HAB Home Intelligence, LLC"
      version: 23093
      revision: 1
      format: 1
      

      and I do not have a ext/ZWaveJSController/zwave_devices.yaml but do have a ext/ZWaveJSController/zwavejs_devices.yaml and it shows

      version: 23052
      revision: 1
      format: 1
      

      Looking in my files I see the latest version was 23093 so I'm grabbing 23094 from your repo and installing now.

      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

      *HASS 2025.3.4
      w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
      MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
      MQTTController: 24257
      ZWave Controller: 25082

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Looks like your Hass devices aren't actually faring much better... nulls there too for some values, and that's a straight pass from Hass itself, not likely something MSR is doing (or not doing).

        Something off about this device. I'm going to PM you instructions to upload a data file from your system.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G gwp1

          @toggledbits Answering in reverse order: yes on restart of MSR (multiple times). Also reloaded the HA ZWaveJS plugin as well as restarted HA as a whole.

          The the first ask:
          647.yaml

          manufacturer_id: 647
          manufacturer_name: "HAB Home Intelligence, LLC"
          version: 23093
          revision: 1
          format: 1
          

          and I do not have a ext/ZWaveJSController/zwave_devices.yaml but do have a ext/ZWaveJSController/zwavejs_devices.yaml and it shows

          version: 23052
          revision: 1
          format: 1
          

          Looking in my files I see the latest version was 23093 so I'm grabbing 23094 from your repo and installing now.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          @toggledbits Ok, release deployed.

          ext/ZWaveJSController/zwavejs_devices.yaml now shows

          version: 23194
          revision: 1
          format: 1
          

          647.yaml still shows

          manufacturer_id: 647
          manufacturer_name: "HAB Home Intelligence, LLC"
          version: 23093
          revision: 1
          format: 1
          

          Node attributes:

          battery_power.since=1694192043559
          cover.state=null
          position.value=null
          x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Cover","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=17;deviceClass.specific.key=7","capabilities":["cover","toggle","position"],"primary_attribute":"cover.state","description":"Window Blind Controller","model":"iblinds V3","default_name":"Window Blind Controller","values":[{"valueId":"38:currentValue:","capabilities":{"cover":{"attributes":{"state":{"expr":"!(value == 0 || value >= 99)"}},"actions":{"open":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":50},"close":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":99},"stop":false}},"position":{"attributes":{"value":{"expr":"round( value / 99, 2 )"}},"actions":{"set":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( parameters.value ?# 0 ), 0 ) ) )"}},"increase":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"decrease":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) - ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"relative":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}}}},"toggle":{"actions":{"toggle":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":{"expr":"entity.attributes.cover.state ? 99 : 50"}}}}}}],"manufacturerId":647,"productType":4,"productId":113}
          x_zwave_values.Battery_isLow=false
          x_zwave_values.Battery_level=100
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_Close_Interval=15
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_Default_ON_Value=50
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_MC=1
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_Maximum_Tilt_Level=99
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_Minimum_Tilt_Level=0
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_Movement_Duration=0
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_Override_Response_to_ON_Command=null
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_Remote_Calibration=1
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_Reset_Button=0
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_Reverse_Direction=1
          x_zwave_values.Configuration_Send_Reports=0
          x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_3=0
          x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_4=0
          x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_5=0
          x_zwave_values.Indicator_identify=true
          x_zwave_values.Indicator_timeout=null
          x_zwave_values.Indicator_value=null
          x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=647
          x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=114
          x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=4
          x_zwave_values.Version_applicationBuildNumber=43707
          x_zwave_values.Version_applicationFrameworkAPIVersion="3.12.1"
          x_zwave_values.Version_applicationFrameworkBuildNumber=35
          x_zwave_values.Version_applicationVersion="3.12.1"
          x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["3.12"]
          x_zwave_values.Version_hardwareVersion=2
          x_zwave_values.Version_hostInterfaceBuildNumber=0
          x_zwave_values.Version_hostInterfaceVersion="unused"
          x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=3
          x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="7.12"
          x_zwave_values.Version_sdkVersion="7.12.2"
          x_zwave_values.Version_zWaveProtocolBuildNumber=35
          x_zwave_values.Version_zWaveProtocolVersion="7.12.2"
          x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_currentValue_23=0
          x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_duration_23={"value":0,"unit":"seconds"}
          x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_levelChangeDown_23=false
          x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_levelChangeUp_23=true
          x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_targetValue_23=0
          zwave_device.capabilities=[106,112,114,128,134,135]
          zwave_device.endpoint=0
          zwave_device.failed=false
          zwave_device.generic_class="Multilevel Switch"
          zwave_device.impl_sig="23194:1:23093:1"
          zwave_device.is_beaming=false
          zwave_device.is_listening=false
          zwave_device.is_routing=true
          zwave_device.is_secure=false
          zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[647,4,114]
          zwave_device.max_data_rate=null
          zwave_device.node_id=20
          zwave_device.specific_class="Motor Control Class C"
          zwave_device.status=4
          zwave_device.status_text="alive"
          zwave_device.version_info=[null,"3.12.1"]
          

          (Did a manual restart via Tools>Restart after the deploy as well.

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HASS 2025.3.4
          w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
          MQTTController: 24257
          ZWave Controller: 25082

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #9

            Yeah, this device is off. It's reporting Multilevel Switch for its generic class, and Motor Control Class C as the more specific, and usually this device class reports command class 38, Multilevel Switch. That's how your other iBlinds units that identify the same way (same 647 manufacturer ID, product type 4, product ID 114) work. But this particular unit does not appear to be advertising command class 38 Multilevel Switch, and is instead reporting command class 106 Window Covering, which is relatively new.

            Once you upload the data I PM'd you about, I'll be curious to see how the reporting firmware compares. But this new unit is definitely working differently from everything else you have, and it doesn't look like HA actually likes it any better -- I think that's why it's reporting the slats angle in HA as null; I bet it shows the same in their dashboard.

            I'll know more/confirm once I see you data. Probably won't get to that until Sunday or Monday at this point, though.

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              Yeah, this device is off. It's reporting Multilevel Switch for its generic class, and Motor Control Class C as the more specific, and usually this device class reports command class 38, Multilevel Switch. That's how your other iBlinds units that identify the same way (same 647 manufacturer ID, product type 4, product ID 114) work. But this particular unit does not appear to be advertising command class 38 Multilevel Switch, and is instead reporting command class 106 Window Covering, which is relatively new.

              Once you upload the data I PM'd you about, I'll be curious to see how the reporting firmware compares. But this new unit is definitely working differently from everything else you have, and it doesn't look like HA actually likes it any better -- I think that's why it's reporting the slats angle in HA as null; I bet it shows the same in their dashboard.

              I'll know more/confirm once I see you data. Probably won't get to that until Sunday or Monday at this point, though.

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              @toggledbits file has been uploaded. This blind is in a guest room that's not in use currently - no rush.

              Do you think excluding/including with HA/ZWjs would have any effect? Could something have gone sideways during pairing that a complete redo might clear?

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HASS 2025.3.4
              w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
              MQTTController: 24257
              ZWave Controller: 25082

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                ZWaveJSController version 23254 has been released. It should handle your oddball iBlinds unit. I'd love to know (not from you, from the manufacturer) what triggers the difference between reporting status in command class 38 versus command class 106 -- only this most recent unit of yours reports/controls via 106; all of the others use 38. And there's no difference in reported model or firmware version. No obvious configuration parameter that might trigger such a difference (e.g. some others, like some Aeotec devices, can change the reporting CC based on a config parameter). Just goes to show you that despite a fairly strict standard and specification, manufacturers can continue to make subtle choices that create headaches.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                G 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  ZWaveJSController version 23254 has been released. It should handle your oddball iBlinds unit. I'd love to know (not from you, from the manufacturer) what triggers the difference between reporting status in command class 38 versus command class 106 -- only this most recent unit of yours reports/controls via 106; all of the others use 38. And there's no difference in reported model or firmware version. No obvious configuration parameter that might trigger such a difference (e.g. some others, like some Aeotec devices, can change the reporting CC based on a config parameter). Just goes to show you that despite a fairly strict standard and specification, manufacturers can continue to make subtle choices that create headaches.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  @toggledbits this was deployed and tests as working. Really appreciate it - I bought two new units and have held off installing the second until it was determined not to be a firmware problem (broken vs them just randomly changing something).

                  Thank you!

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HASS 2025.3.4
                  w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
                  MQTTController: 24257
                  ZWave Controller: 25082

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    ZWaveJSController version 23254 has been released. It should handle your oddball iBlinds unit. I'd love to know (not from you, from the manufacturer) what triggers the difference between reporting status in command class 38 versus command class 106 -- only this most recent unit of yours reports/controls via 106; all of the others use 38. And there's no difference in reported model or firmware version. No obvious configuration parameter that might trigger such a difference (e.g. some others, like some Aeotec devices, can change the reporting CC based on a config parameter). Just goes to show you that despite a fairly strict standard and specification, manufacturers can continue to make subtle choices that create headaches.

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    gwp1
                    wrote on last edited by gwp1
                    #13

                    @toggledbits I contacted iblinds Support. This was their response:

                    *We've had similar reports. I believe it is related to a recent update with Home Assistant supporting the Z-Wave Window Covering Command Class now. So when you add your new devices they are seen with the new command class. I would imagine if you excluded and included one of the older motors they would now be Window Covering devices as opposed to multi-level switches.

                    We initially worked with the ZWaveJS developer when they added the Window Covering CC Support. But unfortunately, our HA in our lab is no longer working so we have been unable to test locally.

                    We have been waiting to get a replacement RPi so hopefully we can do some testing on our end soon.

                    I hope this helps.

                    Best Regards,
                    Eric B.
                    The iblinds Team*

                    Further, I just discovered if I do a reinterview on an existing blind via ZWaveJS in HA it switches to this new Window Covering mode.

                    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
                    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                    *HASS 2025.3.4
                    w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                    MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
                    MQTTController: 24257
                    ZWave Controller: 25082

                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G gwp1

                      @toggledbits I contacted iblinds Support. This was their response:

                      *We've had similar reports. I believe it is related to a recent update with Home Assistant supporting the Z-Wave Window Covering Command Class now. So when you add your new devices they are seen with the new command class. I would imagine if you excluded and included one of the older motors they would now be Window Covering devices as opposed to multi-level switches.

                      We initially worked with the ZWaveJS developer when they added the Window Covering CC Support. But unfortunately, our HA in our lab is no longer working so we have been unable to test locally.

                      We have been waiting to get a replacement RPi so hopefully we can do some testing on our end soon.

                      I hope this helps.

                      Best Regards,
                      Eric B.
                      The iblinds Team*

                      Further, I just discovered if I do a reinterview on an existing blind via ZWaveJS in HA it switches to this new Window Covering mode.

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      tamorgen
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      @gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                      Further, I just discovered if I do a reinterview on an existing blind via ZWaveJS in HA it switches to this new Window Covering mode.

                      For what it's worth, I have both v2 and v3.1 iBlinds in my home. Reinterviewing only changes the type from multilevel switches to window covering on v3.1 blinds. Version 2 blinds remain multilevel switches after reinterviewing.

                      The Window Covering class is supposedly better. The MLS class is designed for rolling blinds, so on/off will have the bllinds all the way open, or all the way off. With horizonal blinds, the 0/100 values are just 180 degree opposites of a closed blind. With Window Covering class, I believe there are values to tell the Z-Wave system what type of blind it is, and specify what is open versus closed. I dealt with iBlinds support maybe 4 or 5 months ago, and at the time, no Z-Wave system supported Window Covering. Zwave JS implemented the change shortly thereafter.

                      G 2 Replies Last reply
                      1
                      • T tamorgen

                        @gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                        Further, I just discovered if I do a reinterview on an existing blind via ZWaveJS in HA it switches to this new Window Covering mode.

                        For what it's worth, I have both v2 and v3.1 iBlinds in my home. Reinterviewing only changes the type from multilevel switches to window covering on v3.1 blinds. Version 2 blinds remain multilevel switches after reinterviewing.

                        The Window Covering class is supposedly better. The MLS class is designed for rolling blinds, so on/off will have the bllinds all the way open, or all the way off. With horizonal blinds, the 0/100 values are just 180 degree opposites of a closed blind. With Window Covering class, I believe there are values to tell the Z-Wave system what type of blind it is, and specify what is open versus closed. I dealt with iBlinds support maybe 4 or 5 months ago, and at the time, no Z-Wave system supported Window Covering. Zwave JS implemented the change shortly thereafter.

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        gwp1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        @tamorgen I'm poking at it now. It seems for the iblinds I can now use cover.close and the [0] NO (default) setting for direction vs having it set to [1] YES to make it tilt the way I want it to when closed.

                        I was using power_switch.off previously to close my v3.1's.

                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                        *HASS 2025.3.4
                        w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                        MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
                        MQTTController: 24257
                        ZWave Controller: 25082

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T tamorgen

                          @gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                          Further, I just discovered if I do a reinterview on an existing blind via ZWaveJS in HA it switches to this new Window Covering mode.

                          For what it's worth, I have both v2 and v3.1 iBlinds in my home. Reinterviewing only changes the type from multilevel switches to window covering on v3.1 blinds. Version 2 blinds remain multilevel switches after reinterviewing.

                          The Window Covering class is supposedly better. The MLS class is designed for rolling blinds, so on/off will have the bllinds all the way open, or all the way off. With horizonal blinds, the 0/100 values are just 180 degree opposites of a closed blind. With Window Covering class, I believe there are values to tell the Z-Wave system what type of blind it is, and specify what is open versus closed. I dealt with iBlinds support maybe 4 or 5 months ago, and at the time, no Z-Wave system supported Window Covering. Zwave JS implemented the change shortly thereafter.

                          G Offline
                          G Offline
                          gwp1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          UPDATE: after many lost hours last night/this morning (hello, 0230 ET, looking at you) I found cover.x and power_switch.x to be woefully unreliable after reinterviewing the blinds.

                          What has proven reliable is position.set for which I use 0 for closed, 50 for open and have the blinds (as they were previously) set to [1] YES for Reverse Direction.

                          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
                          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                          *HASS 2025.3.4
                          w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                          MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
                          MQTTController: 24257
                          ZWave Controller: 25082

                          toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Offline
                            T Offline
                            tamorgen
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            I've been using the ID hass>cover_blind_horizontal_slats_angle and x_hass_cover.open_cover_tilt or x_haas_cover.close_cover_tilt and it works flawlessly for open and close. If I want to set the position for partial close when the sun is glarring into the room, I use x_hass_cover.set_cover_tilt_position with the same ID, and set the tilt_position to whatever I want to reduce the glare.

                            My only problem now is that I use mushroom for my dashboard in Home Assistant, and the templates for covers hasn't caught up with the new Window Covering class. It makes adjusting the blinds more problematic from HA.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G gwp1

                              UPDATE: after many lost hours last night/this morning (hello, 0230 ET, looking at you) I found cover.x and power_switch.x to be woefully unreliable after reinterviewing the blinds.

                              What has proven reliable is position.set for which I use 0 for closed, 50 for open and have the blinds (as they were previously) set to [1] YES for Reverse Direction.

                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              @gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                              UPDATE: after many lost hours last night/this morning (hello, 0230 ET, looking at you) I found cover.x and power_switch.x to be woefully unreliable after reinterviewing the blinds.

                              Can you please be more descriptive here? I don't have these devices, so I can't test them, but that doesn't mean I'm not interested in getting them working reliably. But the description given isn't enough for me to do any troubleshooting at all.

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                @gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                                UPDATE: after many lost hours last night/this morning (hello, 0230 ET, looking at you) I found cover.x and power_switch.x to be woefully unreliable after reinterviewing the blinds.

                                Can you please be more descriptive here? I don't have these devices, so I can't test them, but that doesn't mean I'm not interested in getting them working reliably. But the description given isn't enough for me to do any troubleshooting at all.

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                gwp1
                                wrote on last edited by gwp1
                                #19

                                @toggledbits of course, no problem! I cannot seem to upload images into this response. I've uploaded to your Dropbox shared folder a pair of images.

                                Using the iblind I sent you logs and such for previously as the example, I have a blind called Beach Blind (two guest rooms, one is named Ocean, the other Beach). I use the commands from the ID Beach Blind from zwavejs. As @tamorgen notes, there is also a new one (with the changes HA made) from my HASS controller called Beach Blind Horizontal Slates Angle which has a few less commands including those mentioned starting with x_hass_*.

                                I use the ZwaveJSController commands.

                                cover.open
                                cover.close
                                power_switch.on
                                power_switch.off
                                position.set
                                zwave_device.refresh
                                zwave_device.set_config

                                These are the ones I most commonly use to open, close, and tilt the blinds. refresh is used to force HA to update dasheboards with any changes and set_config I use less often, weekly, to recalibrate the blinds as they do wander sometimes and "open" becomes "open-ish".

                                I'd been using power_switch.on to open and cover.close to close. The blinds have been happiest that way. With these new changes from HA, these commands have become hit/miss. In the HA ZWaveJS plugin the status would reflect 0/closed but the blind was clearly wide open.

                                Last night/this morning I opted to use position.set and it's been pretty solid from what I've seen throughout the day.
                                position.set = 0 nets me a closed blind, position.set = .5 nets me a wide open/"slates level with the ground" blind. I used position.set = .2 or .3 to tilt the sun away during specific dayparts based on sun azimuth.

                                I did not grab MSR logs during those tests - apologies, it was 0200 ET and I just wanted the blinds closed for the night. I have amassed 13 of these iblinds over the past couple years.

                                If you wish, I'll set some time tonight or tomorrow night and generate some MSR logs.

                                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
                                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                *HASS 2025.3.4
                                w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
                                MQTTController: 24257
                                ZWave Controller: 25082

                                T 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G gwp1

                                  @toggledbits of course, no problem! I cannot seem to upload images into this response. I've uploaded to your Dropbox shared folder a pair of images.

                                  Using the iblind I sent you logs and such for previously as the example, I have a blind called Beach Blind (two guest rooms, one is named Ocean, the other Beach). I use the commands from the ID Beach Blind from zwavejs. As @tamorgen notes, there is also a new one (with the changes HA made) from my HASS controller called Beach Blind Horizontal Slates Angle which has a few less commands including those mentioned starting with x_hass_*.

                                  I use the ZwaveJSController commands.

                                  cover.open
                                  cover.close
                                  power_switch.on
                                  power_switch.off
                                  position.set
                                  zwave_device.refresh
                                  zwave_device.set_config

                                  These are the ones I most commonly use to open, close, and tilt the blinds. refresh is used to force HA to update dasheboards with any changes and set_config I use less often, weekly, to recalibrate the blinds as they do wander sometimes and "open" becomes "open-ish".

                                  I'd been using power_switch.on to open and cover.close to close. The blinds have been happiest that way. With these new changes from HA, these commands have become hit/miss. In the HA ZWaveJS plugin the status would reflect 0/closed but the blind was clearly wide open.

                                  Last night/this morning I opted to use position.set and it's been pretty solid from what I've seen throughout the day.
                                  position.set = 0 nets me a closed blind, position.set = .5 nets me a wide open/"slates level with the ground" blind. I used position.set = .2 or .3 to tilt the sun away during specific dayparts based on sun azimuth.

                                  I did not grab MSR logs during those tests - apologies, it was 0200 ET and I just wanted the blinds closed for the night. I have amassed 13 of these iblinds over the past couple years.

                                  If you wish, I'll set some time tonight or tomorrow night and generate some MSR logs.

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  tamorgen
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  @gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                                  With these new changes from HA, these commands have become hit/miss.

                                  To be precise, it's not so much a change from HA, but from ZWaveJS. They're recognizing a new command class that the developers at iBlinds actually recommend.

                                  I don't believe the old power switch commands work with the new command class. When I go into a specific device in ZwaveJS, the switch type devices are greyed out.

                                  46ce7b67-822d-4800-ad9e-84e420f830a6-image.png

                                  if you go into the switch, it shows it as unavailable.

                                  b487cb9f-a396-460f-8190-1753e356ff73-image.png

                                  I would guess the power on/off cover.close / cover.open are remnants and probably need to be removed.

                                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T tamorgen

                                    @gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                                    With these new changes from HA, these commands have become hit/miss.

                                    To be precise, it's not so much a change from HA, but from ZWaveJS. They're recognizing a new command class that the developers at iBlinds actually recommend.

                                    I don't believe the old power switch commands work with the new command class. When I go into a specific device in ZwaveJS, the switch type devices are greyed out.

                                    46ce7b67-822d-4800-ad9e-84e420f830a6-image.png

                                    if you go into the switch, it shows it as unavailable.

                                    b487cb9f-a396-460f-8190-1753e356ff73-image.png

                                    I would guess the power on/off cover.close / cover.open are remnants and probably need to be removed.

                                    G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    gwp1
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    @tamorgen said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                                    I don't believe the old power switch commands work with the new command class. When I go into a specific device in ZwaveJS, the switch type devices are greyed out.

                                    I noticed this as well. I've also noticed that tapping into the dialogue you're showing (how did you copy/paste images, I keep getting a parsing server error...) nets a slider in HA that does nothing. It literally says UNKNOWN at the top where a percentage would be display of openness or closure.

                                    171bb72b-e73d-4b6b-8f17-df6dada2ea20-image.png

                                    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
                                    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                    *HASS 2025.3.4
                                    w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                                    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                    MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
                                    MQTTController: 24257
                                    ZWave Controller: 25082

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G gwp1

                                      @tamorgen said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                                      I don't believe the old power switch commands work with the new command class. When I go into a specific device in ZwaveJS, the switch type devices are greyed out.

                                      I noticed this as well. I've also noticed that tapping into the dialogue you're showing (how did you copy/paste images, I keep getting a parsing server error...) nets a slider in HA that does nothing. It literally says UNKNOWN at the top where a percentage would be display of openness or closure.

                                      171bb72b-e73d-4b6b-8f17-df6dada2ea20-image.png

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      tamorgen
                                      wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                                      #22

                                      @gwp1
                                      It seems to me that something may be missing from this command class integration. I know iBlinds was working with the ZWaveJS developers. I'm curious is this is what they expected.

                                      When I look at the entities in MSR, there are a lot of entries that have null or unknown. I'm not sure if this is coming from MSR expecting entries in a specific command class or if ZWaveJs is providing it to MSR that way.

                                      623091af-63d6-4a31-b68b-5bc8cbd5ff4b-image.png

                                      Of all the actions in that window, the cover.xxx don't seem to work for me. The only ones that seem to work are:

                                      x_hass_cover.close_cover_tilt
                                      x_hass_cover.open_cover_tilt
                                      x_hass_cover.set_cover_tilt_position

                                      Others may work, but these are the one's I know specifically work and from an automation perspective meet my needs.

                                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T tamorgen

                                        @gwp1
                                        It seems to me that something may be missing from this command class integration. I know iBlinds was working with the ZWaveJS developers. I'm curious is this is what they expected.

                                        When I look at the entities in MSR, there are a lot of entries that have null or unknown. I'm not sure if this is coming from MSR expecting entries in a specific command class or if ZWaveJs is providing it to MSR that way.

                                        623091af-63d6-4a31-b68b-5bc8cbd5ff4b-image.png

                                        Of all the actions in that window, the cover.xxx don't seem to work for me. The only ones that seem to work are:

                                        x_hass_cover.close_cover_tilt
                                        x_hass_cover.open_cover_tilt
                                        x_hass_cover.set_cover_tilt_position

                                        Others may work, but these are the one's I know specifically work and from an automation perspective meet my needs.

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        gwp1
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        @tamorgen Yep. The ZWaveJSController from @toggledbits was doing the same and that's what started this thread. He reviewed data from my system and updated his ZWaveJSController to work with those command classes.

                                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
                                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                        *HASS 2025.3.4
                                        w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                        MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
                                        MQTTController: 24257
                                        ZWave Controller: 25082

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          tamorgen
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          Okay, gotcha. I did verify that the cover.open using the zwavejscontroller entries does work on my system with the updated release. Curious that the cover.open command does not work using the equivalent haas entity.

                                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Errors after updating to MQTTController build 25139
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            46

                                          • 🎉 My very first MSR controller: OpenSprinkler
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            5
                                            13
                                            626

                                          • Set Reaction > Script Action
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            50

                                          • Wiring Samotech SM308-S into light fitting
                                            F
                                            Freemanator
                                            0
                                            1
                                            23

                                          • Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
                                            T
                                            tamorgen
                                            0
                                            5
                                            86

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            122
                                            37.3k

                                          • Z-Wave Future....
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            5
                                            165

                                          • Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            120

                                          • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
                                            wmarcolinW
                                            wmarcolin
                                            0
                                            7
                                            247

                                          • Disaster recovery and virtualisation
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            5
                                            691

                                          • Remote access of Zwave stick from Z-wave server
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            413
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved