Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Aeotec Water Sensor 7 Pro reporting in MSR
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Aeotec Water Sensor 7 Pro reporting in MSR

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
9 Posts 2 Posters 735 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    tamorgen
    wrote on last edited by tamorgen
    #1

    Good afternoon,
    Today I replaced an old water sensor that I used in Vera, but Home Assistant did not fully recognize. I had problems with in Vera, so replacing it in Home Assistant wasn’t a big deal. The one I replaced it with is an Aeotec Water Sensor 7 Pro. Home Assistant recognized it perfectly. It’s Zwave Plus, and shows up as secure. Not only does it sensor a water leak, it also senses humidity and air temperature, both of which show up in Home Assistant.

    My main concern of course is it’s ability to detect a water leak. I’m trying to get MSR to detect the binary sensor for water, and I’m getting “null” values for all of the fields in MSR.

    Can anybody advise what I need to do to get MSR to correctly identify the leak sensor?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Posting guidelines, please.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Offline
        T Offline
        tamorgen
        wrote on last edited by tamorgen
        #3

        Sorry, more details.

        I'm running MSR latest (22274) on Fedora 36 server.

        Home Assistant version 202.9.7.

        The Device ID is ZWA019 by Aeotec, with S2 Authenticated and Z-Wave Plus Version 2.

        Z-Wave JS shows 13 entities for the device. The current values are in bold.

        Air temperature 68.0 °F
        Humidity 55.0%
        Water Alarm - Water leak detected Dry
        Sensor state (Water)
        AlarmLevel
        AlarmType
        Home Security - Cover status
        Indicator value
        Node Identify - On/Off Cycle Count
        Node Identify - On/Off Period: Duration
        Node Identify - On/Off Period: On time
        Power Management - Battery maintenance status
        Water Alarm - Sensor status

        What I am looking for is of course the Water Alarm - Water leak detected. In MSR, it shows as follows:

        Entity Attribute
        Dishwasher Flood: Water Alarm - Water leak detected
        hass>binary_sensor_dishwasher_flood_water_alarm_water_leak_detected

        binary_sensor.state (primary)

        ==
        true
        Ignore case
        Current value: (null) null

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Can you post a screen shot of the entity attributes open in the Entities page?

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          T 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            Can you post a screen shot of the entity attributes open in the Entities page?

            T Offline
            T Offline
            tamorgen
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits

            Here you go:
            073B01F0-B48B-47DF-99A0-3EEABA1B50C9.jpeg

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I meant the entities page in Reactor. Find the entity using the search fields, then open the entity detail by clicking the arrow next to its name.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                I meant the entities page in Reactor. Find the entity using the search fields, then open the entity detail by clicking the arrow next to its name.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                tamorgen
                wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                #7

                @toggledbits said in Aeotec Water Sensor 7 Pro reporting in MSR:

                I meant the entities page in Reactor. Find the entity using the search fields, then open the entity detail by clicking the arrow next to its name.

                Well that would make more sense, wouldn’t it.

                The one that says node 26 (Dishwasher Flood Sensor) is still the old one, since it hasn’t fallen off of MSR’s import yet. The new one is just named Dishwasher Flood.

                It’s odd that they all are crossed out.

                90B18EA3-7917-4B5A-A8B8-CDC95ACB55D0.jpeg

                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T tamorgen

                  @toggledbits said in Aeotec Water Sensor 7 Pro reporting in MSR:

                  I meant the entities page in Reactor. Find the entity using the search fields, then open the entity detail by clicking the arrow next to its name.

                  Well that would make more sense, wouldn’t it.

                  The one that says node 26 (Dishwasher Flood Sensor) is still the old one, since it hasn’t fallen off of MSR’s import yet. The new one is just named Dishwasher Flood.

                  It’s odd that they all are crossed out.

                  90B18EA3-7917-4B5A-A8B8-CDC95ACB55D0.jpeg

                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                  #8

                  @tamorgen This is the Reactor behavior when the entities have been deleted. Have you removed/hidden the entities on the Hass side for some reason?

                  On Hass now, if you go to Settings > Devices & Services (Integrations) > Z-WaveJS > XX Entities, it will bring up a list of the entities that Hass knows about from ZWaveJS. The entities for your Dishwasher Flood detector should not have a slashed circle in their row on the right side. Notice in the image below that the first row has an entity that has been disabled/hidden (with slashed circle), but the second row is not hidden. That means Hass will publish the Dome Water Main Shutoff (second entity row) but not the sensor (first row shown):

                  1761a894-b236-4eaf-ac50-07cb67491bdf-image.png

                  What the Z-WaveJS UI (aka zwavejs2mqtt) shows is not relevant here, so don't even consider that in your thinking. Since Reactor is deriving the entities from Hass, all we care about is what Hass is doing. And it appears that Hass is not publishing these entities to Reactor, and we need to find out why.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @tamorgen This is the Reactor behavior when the entities have been deleted. Have you removed/hidden the entities on the Hass side for some reason?

                    On Hass now, if you go to Settings > Devices & Services (Integrations) > Z-WaveJS > XX Entities, it will bring up a list of the entities that Hass knows about from ZWaveJS. The entities for your Dishwasher Flood detector should not have a slashed circle in their row on the right side. Notice in the image below that the first row has an entity that has been disabled/hidden (with slashed circle), but the second row is not hidden. That means Hass will publish the Dome Water Main Shutoff (second entity row) but not the sensor (first row shown):

                    1761a894-b236-4eaf-ac50-07cb67491bdf-image.png

                    What the Z-WaveJS UI (aka zwavejs2mqtt) shows is not relevant here, so don't even consider that in your thinking. Since Reactor is deriving the entities from Hass, all we care about is what Hass is doing. And it appears that Hass is not publishing these entities to Reactor, and we need to find out why.

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    tamorgen
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @toggledbits

                    Mystery solved. I had issues initially adding it into Haas yesterday, because it initially didn’t connect via S2 security. I had to exclude it and include it again. It would appear that I had named it initially as Dishwasher Flood, but when I included it again, I left the default name. It would appear that the initial inclusion hasn’t fallen off of MSR yet. When I searched for Water Sensor in MSR, it shows up correctly.

                    So, operator error, not a problem with MSR or Haas. Thank’s for taking a look.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    Recent Topics

                    • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                      CrilleC
                      Crille
                      0
                      5
                      67

                    • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      5
                      130
                      73.8k

                    • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                      G
                      gwp1
                      0
                      6
                      90

                    • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      1
                      1
                      50

                    • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                      M
                      mgvra
                      1
                      3
                      131

                    • Script action and custom timers
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      4
                      148

                    • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                      CatmanV2C
                      CatmanV2
                      0
                      12
                      403

                    • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                      akbooerA
                      akbooer
                      1
                      2
                      119

                    • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                      CrilleC
                      Crille
                      0
                      6
                      166

                    • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      17
                      483

                    • Shelly Wall Display XL
                      akbooerA
                      akbooer
                      2
                      9
                      805

                    • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      26
                      896
                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                    Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Unsolved