Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. MQTT configuration question
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

MQTT configuration question

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Multi-System Reactor
11 Posts 2 Posters 1.6k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tunnusT Offline
    tunnusT Offline
    tunnus
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file

          x_mqtt_device:
            set_speed:
              arguments:
                speed: 
                  type: str
              topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
              payload:
                type: json
                expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }'
    

    While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?

    Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

    tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tunnusT tunnus

      I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file

            x_mqtt_device:
              set_speed:
                arguments:
                  speed: 
                    type: str
                topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                payload:
                  type: json
                  expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }'
      

      While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?

      tunnusT Offline
      tunnusT Offline
      tunnus
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Then another case, where I'm trying to pass a variable "cmd":

      requires: [cmd]
      ...      
          actions:
            power_switch:
              "on":
                topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                payload:
                  type: json
                  expr: '{ "cmd": true }'
      ...
      

      Expression here seems to be tricky, as "cmd" does not translate to its value (e.g. "econo"). What I'm after here is the following JSON:

      {
        "econo": true
      }
      

      I have tried multiple variations, e.g.:

       expr: "{ cmd: true }"
       expr: "{ 'cmd': true }"
       expr: '{ cmd: true }'
      

      But no luck. The closest I have gotten is with:

      expr: '"{" + cmd + ": true }"'
      

      So any help is appreciated!

      Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Your post doesn't have enough context. Under what section have you placed the x_mqtt_device structure, for example. You're giving us a bunch of bits and pieces that don't line up to anything, so it's impossible to tell if you even have the right structure, let alone if it's going to do anything like what you want to do. If that's a template, show the entire template, because it just looks like a fragment of one.

        You also haven't given us any real context for the device itself. What is it? What topics does it send or receive?

        From what is discernible, defining an action (set_speed) that isn't defined as part of the native definition of x_mqtt_device isn't really a good idea. What you need to do is use an existing system capability that is close to your device, or perhaps define your own extended capability, but redefining an existing extended capability will only create problems.

        As for the cmd part, you're getting close. What you are missing is the context object for cmd, which is config. So you should be using config.cmd to get to the value of the cmd configuration element. But that's not the whole story... you then need to use that value as a key in creating the object. We'd like the expression language to support { [config.cmd]: true } which is similar to JavaScript, but it doesn't (yet -- I'll look into that). But what you can do is this:

          payload:
            type: json
            expr: 'result={}, result[config.cmd]=true, result'
        

        What this expression does is define an empty object in result, then set the key stored in config.cmd to true, and then returns that amended object as the expression result.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          Your post doesn't have enough context. Under what section have you placed the x_mqtt_device structure, for example. You're giving us a bunch of bits and pieces that don't line up to anything, so it's impossible to tell if you even have the right structure, let alone if it's going to do anything like what you want to do. If that's a template, show the entire template, because it just looks like a fragment of one.

          You also haven't given us any real context for the device itself. What is it? What topics does it send or receive?

          From what is discernible, defining an action (set_speed) that isn't defined as part of the native definition of x_mqtt_device isn't really a good idea. What you need to do is use an existing system capability that is close to your device, or perhaps define your own extended capability, but redefining an existing extended capability will only create problems.

          As for the cmd part, you're getting close. What you are missing is the context object for cmd, which is config. So you should be using config.cmd to get to the value of the cmd configuration element. But that's not the whole story... you then need to use that value as a key in creating the object. We'd like the expression language to support { [config.cmd]: true } which is similar to JavaScript, but it doesn't (yet -- I'll look into that). But what you can do is this:

            payload:
              type: json
              expr: 'result={}, result[config.cmd]=true, result'
          

          What this expression does is define an empty object in result, then set the key stored in config.cmd to true, and then returns that amended object as the expression result.

          tunnusT Offline
          tunnusT Offline
          tunnus
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @toggledbits thanks, cmd part works fine! Other part in the same case is:

          ...
          requires: [cmd]
              events:
                "state/%friendly_name%":
                  "power_switch.state":
                    json_payload: true
                    if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.cmd )'
                    expr: "bool(payload.cmd) ? 'on' : 'off'"
          

          Again, here "cmd" should translate to "econo", but for this to work I guess something similar you showed could do, but not sure how to formulate that?

          Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #5

            I'm in teaching mode here. I've given you the tools you need. I'll give you a little bit more... where you have payload.cmd, it is literally looking for the key named cmd in the payload. You need it to look for the word that is in cmd as given by your device configuration. This is exactly the same as one small part of the modification I gave you.

            Go forth and experiment!

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              I'm in teaching mode here. I've given you the tools you need. I'll give you a little bit more... where you have payload.cmd, it is literally looking for the key named cmd in the payload. You need it to look for the word that is in cmd as given by your device configuration. This is exactly the same as one small part of the modification I gave you.

              Go forth and experiment!

              tunnusT Offline
              tunnusT Offline
              tunnus
              wrote on last edited by tunnus
              #6

              @toggledbits ok, got it (took a couple of iterations...) 😎

              Then to my original question, now with a little bit more context:

              daikin_command:
                  capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "value_sensor" ]
                  primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint    
                  events:
                      "hvac_heating_unit.setpoint":
                        json_payload: true
                        if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.target )'
                        expr: "float(payload.target)"
                      "hvac_heating_unit.units": "°C"
                      
                      "hvac_heating_unit.state":
                        json_payload: true
                        if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.mode )'
                        expr: "lower(payload.mode) == 'heat'"
                        
                      "value_sensor.fan":
                        json_payload: true
                        if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                        expr: "str(payload.fan)"
                        
                  actions:        
                    hvac_heating_unit:
                      set_setpoint:
                        topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                        payload:
                          type: json
                          expr: '{ "temp": min(28, max(16, float(parameters.setpoint))) }'
                          
                    x_mqtt_device:
                      set_speed:
                        arguments:
                          speed: 
                            type: str
                        topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                        payload:
                          type: json
                          expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }'
              

              So I want to control fan speed and I noticed there is "hvac_blower_unit" in standard capabilities:

              hvac_blower_unit:
                  ...
                  actions:
                    set_mode:
                      arguments:
                        mode:
                          type: string
                          values:
                            - 'off'
                            - auto
                            - continuous
                            - periodic
                            - low
                            - medium
                            - high
              

              But as this wasn't 1:1 capability mapping as compared to my AC unit, I didn't know how to extend/change that to suit my needs. MQTT topics relevant to this case are documented here. Kinda thought using x_mqtt_device was a good idea. Seems to work though.

              How can I define my own (extended) MQTT capability? Also, I'd like to utilize those fixed arguments, so something like:

              set_speed:
                        arguments:
                          speed:
                            type: str
                            values:
                              - A
                              - Q
                              - 1
                              - 2
                              - 3
                              - 4
                              - 5
              

              Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tunnusT tunnus

                @toggledbits ok, got it (took a couple of iterations...) 😎

                Then to my original question, now with a little bit more context:

                daikin_command:
                    capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "value_sensor" ]
                    primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint    
                    events:
                        "hvac_heating_unit.setpoint":
                          json_payload: true
                          if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.target )'
                          expr: "float(payload.target)"
                        "hvac_heating_unit.units": "°C"
                        
                        "hvac_heating_unit.state":
                          json_payload: true
                          if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.mode )'
                          expr: "lower(payload.mode) == 'heat'"
                          
                        "value_sensor.fan":
                          json_payload: true
                          if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                          expr: "str(payload.fan)"
                          
                    actions:        
                      hvac_heating_unit:
                        set_setpoint:
                          topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                          payload:
                            type: json
                            expr: '{ "temp": min(28, max(16, float(parameters.setpoint))) }'
                            
                      x_mqtt_device:
                        set_speed:
                          arguments:
                            speed: 
                              type: str
                          topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                          payload:
                            type: json
                            expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }'
                

                So I want to control fan speed and I noticed there is "hvac_blower_unit" in standard capabilities:

                hvac_blower_unit:
                    ...
                    actions:
                      set_mode:
                        arguments:
                          mode:
                            type: string
                            values:
                              - 'off'
                              - auto
                              - continuous
                              - periodic
                              - low
                              - medium
                              - high
                

                But as this wasn't 1:1 capability mapping as compared to my AC unit, I didn't know how to extend/change that to suit my needs. MQTT topics relevant to this case are documented here. Kinda thought using x_mqtt_device was a good idea. Seems to work though.

                How can I define my own (extended) MQTT capability? Also, I'd like to utilize those fixed arguments, so something like:

                set_speed:
                          arguments:
                            speed:
                              type: str
                              values:
                                - A
                                - Q
                                - 1
                                - 2
                                - 3
                                - 4
                                - 5
                
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                #7

                @tunnus Kudos! I'm guessing you discovered that something like payload[config.cmd] got you where you were going with that (I'm repeating it here for future readers, since you didn't show your final result).

                To your next question, first thing: I believe you said you are using local_mqtt_devices.yaml. You'll "modernize" a bit by moving your template to its own file (e.g. daikin.yaml) in config/mqtt_templates/. Within template files in that subdirectory, you can define both custom capabilities and the templates that use them. They are structured more like a package, so you can more easily share them as others here have done.

                In this case, though, you probably don't need to define your own capability. While the system-defined capabilities have values for attributes and action parameters, they are not set in stone. The defined values are a reasonable subset that a lot of devices may have in common, but there would be no way for me to know the entire range of values for every device that ever was or will be, so Reactor doesn't enforce them. They are mostly hints to the UI for reasonable values it can display for the user as a starting point. You can use your own values for hvac_blower_unit.set_mode without defining your own capability; it won't be a problem as long as your implementation (template) expects those values and handles them.

                You're on the right track replacing the value_sensor capability with hvac_blower_unit. Using your posted config as a guide, it may look something like below. Let's look at the attributes of the capability first:

                daikin_command:
                  # some config here, redacted in OP's post
                    capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "hvac_blower_unit" ]
                    primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint
                    events:
                      "some-topic-for-status-I-assume":  # topic was redacted in OP's post
                        # hvac_heating_unit stuff redacted for clarity/focus on hvac_blower_unit
                        "hvac_blower_unit.state":
                          json_payload: true
                          if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                          expr: 'payload?.fan !== "X"'  # whatever expression you need here.
                        "hvac_blower_unit.mode":
                          json_payload: true
                          if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                          expr: payload.fan
                          map:
                            A: auto
                            Q: quiet
                            1: low
                            2: low-medium
                            3: medium
                            4: medium-high
                            5: high
                

                What I can't tell from your posts is if there's a value for payload.fan that represents fan off. That would be used to drive the state boolean attribute. You may use an expression like expr: payload?.fan !== "X" Assuming X means off, state will be false when the fan is off, and true when it's running at any speed, which is the intent of the attribute. If the fan is always running or you just don't know (i.e. the device doesn't actually report it), you can forego the if_expr and expr and just supply value: true (or perhaps value: null, meaning "I don't know"), which supplies a fixed value for that attribute that never changes.

                For hvac_blower_unit.mode, you can see I've mapped the single-character values to strings. This isn't strictly necessary, but it's in keeping with the spirit of Reactor's design goals. Some of the values map to pre-defined values in the capability, and some don't, and that's just fine. It won't bother Reactor at all.

                Now on the action side, we need to add:

                    actions:
                      hvac_blower_unit:
                        set_mode:
                          topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                          payload:
                            type: json
                            expr: |
                              value = {},
                              value.fan =
                                ({
                                  "auto": "A",
                                  "quiet": "Q",
                                  "low": 1,
                                  "low-medium": 2,
                                  "medium": 3,
                                  "medium-high": 4,
                                  "high": 5
                                })[parameters.mode] ?? parameters.mode, value
                

                This defines the set_mode action for the capability, preparing it to send a JSON payload. It first sets up an empty object in the value local variable. It then sets the fan key in the object by mapping any words given in the mode parameter to the action back to their letter equivalent for the device. If the value of the mode parameter doesn't map, it's just passed through as given (so you can still use the one-letter values directly if you don't want to use the words). Finally, the object in value is returned as the expression result (that's the , value bit at the end).

                Digging in to that mapping a little more, we're creating a key-value pair object on the fly to use to look the value in parameters.mode. If it matches a key (i.e. left side of a colon), it changes it to the value (the right of the colon). If it matches nothing, the lookup results in null, which is handled by the ?? operator — when given null on its left, it returns the value of the expression on its right (i.e. if the map isn't matched, parameters.mode as given is the result). This is how you can use either the fancy strings or the one-letter values equally.

                Hint: for debugging, when you run an action, MQTTController logs the exact topic and full payload being published at INFO level by default.

                Finally, if you truly wanted to define your own capability, you could make your own Daikin+MQTT custom version of hvac_blower_unit by putting it in a capabilities section of your template file (this does not work in local_mqtt_devices.yaml, only in files in config/mqtt_templates/:

                capabilities:
                  x_mqtt_daikin_moredetail:  # moredetail may include device type, model number, interface type, etc.
                    attributes:
                      speed:
                        type: string
                        values:
                          - A
                          - Q
                          - 1
                          - 2
                          - 3
                          - 4
                          - 5
                    actions:
                      set_speed:
                        arguments:
                          speed:
                            type: string
                            values:
                              - A
                              - Q
                              - 1
                              - 2
                              - 3
                              - 4
                              - 5
                

                This section can just precede the templates: section in your file. You would then adjust the capability name, attribute name, and action and parameters names accordingly in the above example to match your custom definition.

                When you post snippets, please don't redact in a way that disrupts the structure. For example, you removed the topics from under events, and other data in your template. For future readers, that makes your post confusing and misleading, so other people that may find your post because they're having the same problem won't be able to follow it as easily. It would also be a courtesy to those other readers if you posted the final solution, for example the expression you finally came up with for the first problem solved.

                Link to: MQTTController Documentation

                Edit: fix missing expr in example for hvac_blower_unit.mode.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                tunnusT 2 Replies Last reply
                👍
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  @tunnus Kudos! I'm guessing you discovered that something like payload[config.cmd] got you where you were going with that (I'm repeating it here for future readers, since you didn't show your final result).

                  To your next question, first thing: I believe you said you are using local_mqtt_devices.yaml. You'll "modernize" a bit by moving your template to its own file (e.g. daikin.yaml) in config/mqtt_templates/. Within template files in that subdirectory, you can define both custom capabilities and the templates that use them. They are structured more like a package, so you can more easily share them as others here have done.

                  In this case, though, you probably don't need to define your own capability. While the system-defined capabilities have values for attributes and action parameters, they are not set in stone. The defined values are a reasonable subset that a lot of devices may have in common, but there would be no way for me to know the entire range of values for every device that ever was or will be, so Reactor doesn't enforce them. They are mostly hints to the UI for reasonable values it can display for the user as a starting point. You can use your own values for hvac_blower_unit.set_mode without defining your own capability; it won't be a problem as long as your implementation (template) expects those values and handles them.

                  You're on the right track replacing the value_sensor capability with hvac_blower_unit. Using your posted config as a guide, it may look something like below. Let's look at the attributes of the capability first:

                  daikin_command:
                    # some config here, redacted in OP's post
                      capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "hvac_blower_unit" ]
                      primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint
                      events:
                        "some-topic-for-status-I-assume":  # topic was redacted in OP's post
                          # hvac_heating_unit stuff redacted for clarity/focus on hvac_blower_unit
                          "hvac_blower_unit.state":
                            json_payload: true
                            if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                            expr: 'payload?.fan !== "X"'  # whatever expression you need here.
                          "hvac_blower_unit.mode":
                            json_payload: true
                            if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                            expr: payload.fan
                            map:
                              A: auto
                              Q: quiet
                              1: low
                              2: low-medium
                              3: medium
                              4: medium-high
                              5: high
                  

                  What I can't tell from your posts is if there's a value for payload.fan that represents fan off. That would be used to drive the state boolean attribute. You may use an expression like expr: payload?.fan !== "X" Assuming X means off, state will be false when the fan is off, and true when it's running at any speed, which is the intent of the attribute. If the fan is always running or you just don't know (i.e. the device doesn't actually report it), you can forego the if_expr and expr and just supply value: true (or perhaps value: null, meaning "I don't know"), which supplies a fixed value for that attribute that never changes.

                  For hvac_blower_unit.mode, you can see I've mapped the single-character values to strings. This isn't strictly necessary, but it's in keeping with the spirit of Reactor's design goals. Some of the values map to pre-defined values in the capability, and some don't, and that's just fine. It won't bother Reactor at all.

                  Now on the action side, we need to add:

                      actions:
                        hvac_blower_unit:
                          set_mode:
                            topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                            payload:
                              type: json
                              expr: |
                                value = {},
                                value.fan =
                                  ({
                                    "auto": "A",
                                    "quiet": "Q",
                                    "low": 1,
                                    "low-medium": 2,
                                    "medium": 3,
                                    "medium-high": 4,
                                    "high": 5
                                  })[parameters.mode] ?? parameters.mode, value
                  

                  This defines the set_mode action for the capability, preparing it to send a JSON payload. It first sets up an empty object in the value local variable. It then sets the fan key in the object by mapping any words given in the mode parameter to the action back to their letter equivalent for the device. If the value of the mode parameter doesn't map, it's just passed through as given (so you can still use the one-letter values directly if you don't want to use the words). Finally, the object in value is returned as the expression result (that's the , value bit at the end).

                  Digging in to that mapping a little more, we're creating a key-value pair object on the fly to use to look the value in parameters.mode. If it matches a key (i.e. left side of a colon), it changes it to the value (the right of the colon). If it matches nothing, the lookup results in null, which is handled by the ?? operator — when given null on its left, it returns the value of the expression on its right (i.e. if the map isn't matched, parameters.mode as given is the result). This is how you can use either the fancy strings or the one-letter values equally.

                  Hint: for debugging, when you run an action, MQTTController logs the exact topic and full payload being published at INFO level by default.

                  Finally, if you truly wanted to define your own capability, you could make your own Daikin+MQTT custom version of hvac_blower_unit by putting it in a capabilities section of your template file (this does not work in local_mqtt_devices.yaml, only in files in config/mqtt_templates/:

                  capabilities:
                    x_mqtt_daikin_moredetail:  # moredetail may include device type, model number, interface type, etc.
                      attributes:
                        speed:
                          type: string
                          values:
                            - A
                            - Q
                            - 1
                            - 2
                            - 3
                            - 4
                            - 5
                      actions:
                        set_speed:
                          arguments:
                            speed:
                              type: string
                              values:
                                - A
                                - Q
                                - 1
                                - 2
                                - 3
                                - 4
                                - 5
                  

                  This section can just precede the templates: section in your file. You would then adjust the capability name, attribute name, and action and parameters names accordingly in the above example to match your custom definition.

                  When you post snippets, please don't redact in a way that disrupts the structure. For example, you removed the topics from under events, and other data in your template. For future readers, that makes your post confusing and misleading, so other people that may find your post because they're having the same problem won't be able to follow it as easily. It would also be a courtesy to those other readers if you posted the final solution, for example the expression you finally came up with for the first problem solved.

                  Link to: MQTTController Documentation

                  Edit: fix missing expr in example for hvac_blower_unit.mode.

                  tunnusT Offline
                  tunnusT Offline
                  tunnus
                  wrote on last edited by tunnus
                  #8

                  @toggledbits thanks again! I did left some stuff out, as I thought they were not relevant for the questions at hand, as I was not trying to present how to configure a particular device, but trying to learn how to do something a bit more "advanced" (and that stuff would be visible to others as well).

                  Actually only thing I left out from my "daikin_command" template was power_switch:

                   daikin_command:
                      # also nothing here before capabilities
                      capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "power_switch", "value_sensor" ]
                      primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint    
                      events:
                        "state/%friendly_name%":
                          "power_switch.state":
                            json_payload: true
                            if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.power )'
                            expr: "payload.power ? 'on' : 'off'"
                  ...
                  

                  For clarity, here's that "payload.cmd" final solution (with some extra logic):

                  requires: [cmd]
                      events:
                        "state/%friendly_name%":
                          "power_switch.state":
                            json_payload: true
                            expr: 'config.cmd == "swingv" || config.cmd == "swingh" ? payload.swing : payload[config.cmd]'
                  

                  About "hvac_blower_unit.mode", I think you had forgotten "expr", so I added that, and also "map_default" in case something changes in the other end, and this would continue to work. Also those mapping values were the other way around (something that you could not know).

                        "hvac_blower_unit.mode":
                            json_payload: true
                            if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                            expr: "payload.fan"
                            map:
                              auto: "Auto"
                              night: "Indoor quiet"
                              low: 1
                              lowMedium: 2 
                              medium: 3
                              mediumHigh: 4
                              high: 5 
                            map_default: payload.fan
                  

                  Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                  toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tunnusT tunnus

                    @toggledbits thanks again! I did left some stuff out, as I thought they were not relevant for the questions at hand, as I was not trying to present how to configure a particular device, but trying to learn how to do something a bit more "advanced" (and that stuff would be visible to others as well).

                    Actually only thing I left out from my "daikin_command" template was power_switch:

                     daikin_command:
                        # also nothing here before capabilities
                        capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "power_switch", "value_sensor" ]
                        primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint    
                        events:
                          "state/%friendly_name%":
                            "power_switch.state":
                              json_payload: true
                              if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.power )'
                              expr: "payload.power ? 'on' : 'off'"
                    ...
                    

                    For clarity, here's that "payload.cmd" final solution (with some extra logic):

                    requires: [cmd]
                        events:
                          "state/%friendly_name%":
                            "power_switch.state":
                              json_payload: true
                              expr: 'config.cmd == "swingv" || config.cmd == "swingh" ? payload.swing : payload[config.cmd]'
                    

                    About "hvac_blower_unit.mode", I think you had forgotten "expr", so I added that, and also "map_default" in case something changes in the other end, and this would continue to work. Also those mapping values were the other way around (something that you could not know).

                          "hvac_blower_unit.mode":
                              json_payload: true
                              if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                              expr: "payload.fan"
                              map:
                                auto: "Auto"
                                night: "Indoor quiet"
                                low: 1
                                lowMedium: 2 
                                medium: 3
                                mediumHigh: 4
                                high: 5 
                              map_default: payload.fan
                    
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @tunnus said in MQTT configuration question:

                    About "hvac_blower_unit.mode", I think you had forgotten "expr", so I added that, and also "map_default" in case something changes in the other end, and this would continue to work.

                    Yes, you are correct on expr -- I missed it. I will amend my prior post.

                    map_unmatched is not necessary. The default for map is to leave the value unchanged. And actually, the map_default you provided will result in the default being the string "payload.fan", not the value of the expression payload.fan.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      @tunnus said in MQTT configuration question:

                      About "hvac_blower_unit.mode", I think you had forgotten "expr", so I added that, and also "map_default" in case something changes in the other end, and this would continue to work.

                      Yes, you are correct on expr -- I missed it. I will amend my prior post.

                      map_unmatched is not necessary. The default for map is to leave the value unchanged. And actually, the map_default you provided will result in the default being the string "payload.fan", not the value of the expression payload.fan.

                      tunnusT Offline
                      tunnusT Offline
                      tunnus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @toggledbits ok, good to know

                      Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        @tunnus Kudos! I'm guessing you discovered that something like payload[config.cmd] got you where you were going with that (I'm repeating it here for future readers, since you didn't show your final result).

                        To your next question, first thing: I believe you said you are using local_mqtt_devices.yaml. You'll "modernize" a bit by moving your template to its own file (e.g. daikin.yaml) in config/mqtt_templates/. Within template files in that subdirectory, you can define both custom capabilities and the templates that use them. They are structured more like a package, so you can more easily share them as others here have done.

                        In this case, though, you probably don't need to define your own capability. While the system-defined capabilities have values for attributes and action parameters, they are not set in stone. The defined values are a reasonable subset that a lot of devices may have in common, but there would be no way for me to know the entire range of values for every device that ever was or will be, so Reactor doesn't enforce them. They are mostly hints to the UI for reasonable values it can display for the user as a starting point. You can use your own values for hvac_blower_unit.set_mode without defining your own capability; it won't be a problem as long as your implementation (template) expects those values and handles them.

                        You're on the right track replacing the value_sensor capability with hvac_blower_unit. Using your posted config as a guide, it may look something like below. Let's look at the attributes of the capability first:

                        daikin_command:
                          # some config here, redacted in OP's post
                            capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "hvac_blower_unit" ]
                            primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint
                            events:
                              "some-topic-for-status-I-assume":  # topic was redacted in OP's post
                                # hvac_heating_unit stuff redacted for clarity/focus on hvac_blower_unit
                                "hvac_blower_unit.state":
                                  json_payload: true
                                  if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                                  expr: 'payload?.fan !== "X"'  # whatever expression you need here.
                                "hvac_blower_unit.mode":
                                  json_payload: true
                                  if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                                  expr: payload.fan
                                  map:
                                    A: auto
                                    Q: quiet
                                    1: low
                                    2: low-medium
                                    3: medium
                                    4: medium-high
                                    5: high
                        

                        What I can't tell from your posts is if there's a value for payload.fan that represents fan off. That would be used to drive the state boolean attribute. You may use an expression like expr: payload?.fan !== "X" Assuming X means off, state will be false when the fan is off, and true when it's running at any speed, which is the intent of the attribute. If the fan is always running or you just don't know (i.e. the device doesn't actually report it), you can forego the if_expr and expr and just supply value: true (or perhaps value: null, meaning "I don't know"), which supplies a fixed value for that attribute that never changes.

                        For hvac_blower_unit.mode, you can see I've mapped the single-character values to strings. This isn't strictly necessary, but it's in keeping with the spirit of Reactor's design goals. Some of the values map to pre-defined values in the capability, and some don't, and that's just fine. It won't bother Reactor at all.

                        Now on the action side, we need to add:

                            actions:
                              hvac_blower_unit:
                                set_mode:
                                  topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                                  payload:
                                    type: json
                                    expr: |
                                      value = {},
                                      value.fan =
                                        ({
                                          "auto": "A",
                                          "quiet": "Q",
                                          "low": 1,
                                          "low-medium": 2,
                                          "medium": 3,
                                          "medium-high": 4,
                                          "high": 5
                                        })[parameters.mode] ?? parameters.mode, value
                        

                        This defines the set_mode action for the capability, preparing it to send a JSON payload. It first sets up an empty object in the value local variable. It then sets the fan key in the object by mapping any words given in the mode parameter to the action back to their letter equivalent for the device. If the value of the mode parameter doesn't map, it's just passed through as given (so you can still use the one-letter values directly if you don't want to use the words). Finally, the object in value is returned as the expression result (that's the , value bit at the end).

                        Digging in to that mapping a little more, we're creating a key-value pair object on the fly to use to look the value in parameters.mode. If it matches a key (i.e. left side of a colon), it changes it to the value (the right of the colon). If it matches nothing, the lookup results in null, which is handled by the ?? operator — when given null on its left, it returns the value of the expression on its right (i.e. if the map isn't matched, parameters.mode as given is the result). This is how you can use either the fancy strings or the one-letter values equally.

                        Hint: for debugging, when you run an action, MQTTController logs the exact topic and full payload being published at INFO level by default.

                        Finally, if you truly wanted to define your own capability, you could make your own Daikin+MQTT custom version of hvac_blower_unit by putting it in a capabilities section of your template file (this does not work in local_mqtt_devices.yaml, only in files in config/mqtt_templates/:

                        capabilities:
                          x_mqtt_daikin_moredetail:  # moredetail may include device type, model number, interface type, etc.
                            attributes:
                              speed:
                                type: string
                                values:
                                  - A
                                  - Q
                                  - 1
                                  - 2
                                  - 3
                                  - 4
                                  - 5
                            actions:
                              set_speed:
                                arguments:
                                  speed:
                                    type: string
                                    values:
                                      - A
                                      - Q
                                      - 1
                                      - 2
                                      - 3
                                      - 4
                                      - 5
                        

                        This section can just precede the templates: section in your file. You would then adjust the capability name, attribute name, and action and parameters names accordingly in the above example to match your custom definition.

                        When you post snippets, please don't redact in a way that disrupts the structure. For example, you removed the topics from under events, and other data in your template. For future readers, that makes your post confusing and misleading, so other people that may find your post because they're having the same problem won't be able to follow it as easily. It would also be a courtesy to those other readers if you posted the final solution, for example the expression you finally came up with for the first problem solved.

                        Link to: MQTTController Documentation

                        Edit: fix missing expr in example for hvac_blower_unit.mode.

                        tunnusT Offline
                        tunnusT Offline
                        tunnus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Hint: for debugging, when you run an action, MQTTController logs the exact topic and full payload being published at INFO level by default.

                        I've used MQTTX, which I can highly recommend

                        Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • tunnusT tunnus marked this topic as a question on
                        • tunnusT tunnus has marked this topic as solved on
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Recent Topics

                        • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          2
                          38

                        • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                          S
                          SweetGenius
                          1
                          1
                          31

                        • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          2
                          1
                          28

                        • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          1
                          61

                        • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          4
                          81

                        • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                          therealdbT
                          therealdb
                          0
                          3
                          98

                        • Possible feature request 2?
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          3
                          76

                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          5
                          133
                          80.1k

                        • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          1
                          9
                          381

                        • Copying a global reaction
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          3
                          117

                        • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          9
                          450

                        • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          4
                          168
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Unsolved