Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. MQTT configuration question
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Help with scene controller cycling logic
therealdbT
I’ve added a couple of Shelly Wave i4 as scene controllers and I’m planning to add more, since I can just use standard buttons instead of battery-powered scene controllers, which also looks better aesthetically. That said, I’m struggling to figure out how to write a simple rule that cycles between states every time I press a button. Example: Light 1 ON → OFF, then Light 2 ON → OFF. The part I can’t get right is handling the case where Light 1 or Light 2 might already be ON independently of the rule. Maybe it’s just too much sun and relaxation clouding my brain, but any hint would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
wmarcolinW
Use case: When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled. To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work. Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch. In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR. Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR. If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR. Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
Multi-System Reactor

MQTT configuration question

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Multi-System Reactor
11 Posts 2 Posters 1.3k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tunnusT Online
    tunnusT Online
    tunnus
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file

          x_mqtt_device:
            set_speed:
              arguments:
                speed: 
                  type: str
              topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
              payload:
                type: json
                expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }'
    

    While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?

    Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

    tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tunnusT tunnus

      I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file

            x_mqtt_device:
              set_speed:
                arguments:
                  speed: 
                    type: str
                topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                payload:
                  type: json
                  expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }'
      

      While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?

      tunnusT Online
      tunnusT Online
      tunnus
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Then another case, where I'm trying to pass a variable "cmd":

      requires: [cmd]
      ...      
          actions:
            power_switch:
              "on":
                topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                payload:
                  type: json
                  expr: '{ "cmd": true }'
      ...
      

      Expression here seems to be tricky, as "cmd" does not translate to its value (e.g. "econo"). What I'm after here is the following JSON:

      {
        "econo": true
      }
      

      I have tried multiple variations, e.g.:

       expr: "{ cmd: true }"
       expr: "{ 'cmd': true }"
       expr: '{ cmd: true }'
      

      But no luck. The closest I have gotten is with:

      expr: '"{" + cmd + ": true }"'
      

      So any help is appreciated!

      Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Your post doesn't have enough context. Under what section have you placed the x_mqtt_device structure, for example. You're giving us a bunch of bits and pieces that don't line up to anything, so it's impossible to tell if you even have the right structure, let alone if it's going to do anything like what you want to do. If that's a template, show the entire template, because it just looks like a fragment of one.

        You also haven't given us any real context for the device itself. What is it? What topics does it send or receive?

        From what is discernible, defining an action (set_speed) that isn't defined as part of the native definition of x_mqtt_device isn't really a good idea. What you need to do is use an existing system capability that is close to your device, or perhaps define your own extended capability, but redefining an existing extended capability will only create problems.

        As for the cmd part, you're getting close. What you are missing is the context object for cmd, which is config. So you should be using config.cmd to get to the value of the cmd configuration element. But that's not the whole story... you then need to use that value as a key in creating the object. We'd like the expression language to support { [config.cmd]: true } which is similar to JavaScript, but it doesn't (yet -- I'll look into that). But what you can do is this:

          payload:
            type: json
            expr: 'result={}, result[config.cmd]=true, result'
        

        What this expression does is define an empty object in result, then set the key stored in config.cmd to true, and then returns that amended object as the expression result.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          Your post doesn't have enough context. Under what section have you placed the x_mqtt_device structure, for example. You're giving us a bunch of bits and pieces that don't line up to anything, so it's impossible to tell if you even have the right structure, let alone if it's going to do anything like what you want to do. If that's a template, show the entire template, because it just looks like a fragment of one.

          You also haven't given us any real context for the device itself. What is it? What topics does it send or receive?

          From what is discernible, defining an action (set_speed) that isn't defined as part of the native definition of x_mqtt_device isn't really a good idea. What you need to do is use an existing system capability that is close to your device, or perhaps define your own extended capability, but redefining an existing extended capability will only create problems.

          As for the cmd part, you're getting close. What you are missing is the context object for cmd, which is config. So you should be using config.cmd to get to the value of the cmd configuration element. But that's not the whole story... you then need to use that value as a key in creating the object. We'd like the expression language to support { [config.cmd]: true } which is similar to JavaScript, but it doesn't (yet -- I'll look into that). But what you can do is this:

            payload:
              type: json
              expr: 'result={}, result[config.cmd]=true, result'
          

          What this expression does is define an empty object in result, then set the key stored in config.cmd to true, and then returns that amended object as the expression result.

          tunnusT Online
          tunnusT Online
          tunnus
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @toggledbits thanks, cmd part works fine! Other part in the same case is:

          ...
          requires: [cmd]
              events:
                "state/%friendly_name%":
                  "power_switch.state":
                    json_payload: true
                    if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.cmd )'
                    expr: "bool(payload.cmd) ? 'on' : 'off'"
          

          Again, here "cmd" should translate to "econo", but for this to work I guess something similar you showed could do, but not sure how to formulate that?

          Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #5

            I'm in teaching mode here. I've given you the tools you need. I'll give you a little bit more... where you have payload.cmd, it is literally looking for the key named cmd in the payload. You need it to look for the word that is in cmd as given by your device configuration. This is exactly the same as one small part of the modification I gave you.

            Go forth and experiment!

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              I'm in teaching mode here. I've given you the tools you need. I'll give you a little bit more... where you have payload.cmd, it is literally looking for the key named cmd in the payload. You need it to look for the word that is in cmd as given by your device configuration. This is exactly the same as one small part of the modification I gave you.

              Go forth and experiment!

              tunnusT Online
              tunnusT Online
              tunnus
              wrote on last edited by tunnus
              #6

              @toggledbits ok, got it (took a couple of iterations...) 😎

              Then to my original question, now with a little bit more context:

              daikin_command:
                  capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "value_sensor" ]
                  primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint    
                  events:
                      "hvac_heating_unit.setpoint":
                        json_payload: true
                        if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.target )'
                        expr: "float(payload.target)"
                      "hvac_heating_unit.units": "°C"
                      
                      "hvac_heating_unit.state":
                        json_payload: true
                        if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.mode )'
                        expr: "lower(payload.mode) == 'heat'"
                        
                      "value_sensor.fan":
                        json_payload: true
                        if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                        expr: "str(payload.fan)"
                        
                  actions:        
                    hvac_heating_unit:
                      set_setpoint:
                        topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                        payload:
                          type: json
                          expr: '{ "temp": min(28, max(16, float(parameters.setpoint))) }'
                          
                    x_mqtt_device:
                      set_speed:
                        arguments:
                          speed: 
                            type: str
                        topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                        payload:
                          type: json
                          expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }'
              

              So I want to control fan speed and I noticed there is "hvac_blower_unit" in standard capabilities:

              hvac_blower_unit:
                  ...
                  actions:
                    set_mode:
                      arguments:
                        mode:
                          type: string
                          values:
                            - 'off'
                            - auto
                            - continuous
                            - periodic
                            - low
                            - medium
                            - high
              

              But as this wasn't 1:1 capability mapping as compared to my AC unit, I didn't know how to extend/change that to suit my needs. MQTT topics relevant to this case are documented here. Kinda thought using x_mqtt_device was a good idea. Seems to work though.

              How can I define my own (extended) MQTT capability? Also, I'd like to utilize those fixed arguments, so something like:

              set_speed:
                        arguments:
                          speed:
                            type: str
                            values:
                              - A
                              - Q
                              - 1
                              - 2
                              - 3
                              - 4
                              - 5
              

              Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tunnusT tunnus

                @toggledbits ok, got it (took a couple of iterations...) 😎

                Then to my original question, now with a little bit more context:

                daikin_command:
                    capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "value_sensor" ]
                    primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint    
                    events:
                        "hvac_heating_unit.setpoint":
                          json_payload: true
                          if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.target )'
                          expr: "float(payload.target)"
                        "hvac_heating_unit.units": "°C"
                        
                        "hvac_heating_unit.state":
                          json_payload: true
                          if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.mode )'
                          expr: "lower(payload.mode) == 'heat'"
                          
                        "value_sensor.fan":
                          json_payload: true
                          if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                          expr: "str(payload.fan)"
                          
                    actions:        
                      hvac_heating_unit:
                        set_setpoint:
                          topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                          payload:
                            type: json
                            expr: '{ "temp": min(28, max(16, float(parameters.setpoint))) }'
                            
                      x_mqtt_device:
                        set_speed:
                          arguments:
                            speed: 
                              type: str
                          topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                          payload:
                            type: json
                            expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }'
                

                So I want to control fan speed and I noticed there is "hvac_blower_unit" in standard capabilities:

                hvac_blower_unit:
                    ...
                    actions:
                      set_mode:
                        arguments:
                          mode:
                            type: string
                            values:
                              - 'off'
                              - auto
                              - continuous
                              - periodic
                              - low
                              - medium
                              - high
                

                But as this wasn't 1:1 capability mapping as compared to my AC unit, I didn't know how to extend/change that to suit my needs. MQTT topics relevant to this case are documented here. Kinda thought using x_mqtt_device was a good idea. Seems to work though.

                How can I define my own (extended) MQTT capability? Also, I'd like to utilize those fixed arguments, so something like:

                set_speed:
                          arguments:
                            speed:
                              type: str
                              values:
                                - A
                                - Q
                                - 1
                                - 2
                                - 3
                                - 4
                                - 5
                
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                #7

                @tunnus Kudos! I'm guessing you discovered that something like payload[config.cmd] got you where you were going with that (I'm repeating it here for future readers, since you didn't show your final result).

                To your next question, first thing: I believe you said you are using local_mqtt_devices.yaml. You'll "modernize" a bit by moving your template to its own file (e.g. daikin.yaml) in config/mqtt_templates/. Within template files in that subdirectory, you can define both custom capabilities and the templates that use them. They are structured more like a package, so you can more easily share them as others here have done.

                In this case, though, you probably don't need to define your own capability. While the system-defined capabilities have values for attributes and action parameters, they are not set in stone. The defined values are a reasonable subset that a lot of devices may have in common, but there would be no way for me to know the entire range of values for every device that ever was or will be, so Reactor doesn't enforce them. They are mostly hints to the UI for reasonable values it can display for the user as a starting point. You can use your own values for hvac_blower_unit.set_mode without defining your own capability; it won't be a problem as long as your implementation (template) expects those values and handles them.

                You're on the right track replacing the value_sensor capability with hvac_blower_unit. Using your posted config as a guide, it may look something like below. Let's look at the attributes of the capability first:

                daikin_command:
                  # some config here, redacted in OP's post
                    capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "hvac_blower_unit" ]
                    primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint
                    events:
                      "some-topic-for-status-I-assume":  # topic was redacted in OP's post
                        # hvac_heating_unit stuff redacted for clarity/focus on hvac_blower_unit
                        "hvac_blower_unit.state":
                          json_payload: true
                          if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                          expr: 'payload?.fan !== "X"'  # whatever expression you need here.
                        "hvac_blower_unit.mode":
                          json_payload: true
                          if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                          expr: payload.fan
                          map:
                            A: auto
                            Q: quiet
                            1: low
                            2: low-medium
                            3: medium
                            4: medium-high
                            5: high
                

                What I can't tell from your posts is if there's a value for payload.fan that represents fan off. That would be used to drive the state boolean attribute. You may use an expression like expr: payload?.fan !== "X" Assuming X means off, state will be false when the fan is off, and true when it's running at any speed, which is the intent of the attribute. If the fan is always running or you just don't know (i.e. the device doesn't actually report it), you can forego the if_expr and expr and just supply value: true (or perhaps value: null, meaning "I don't know"), which supplies a fixed value for that attribute that never changes.

                For hvac_blower_unit.mode, you can see I've mapped the single-character values to strings. This isn't strictly necessary, but it's in keeping with the spirit of Reactor's design goals. Some of the values map to pre-defined values in the capability, and some don't, and that's just fine. It won't bother Reactor at all.

                Now on the action side, we need to add:

                    actions:
                      hvac_blower_unit:
                        set_mode:
                          topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                          payload:
                            type: json
                            expr: |
                              value = {},
                              value.fan =
                                ({
                                  "auto": "A",
                                  "quiet": "Q",
                                  "low": 1,
                                  "low-medium": 2,
                                  "medium": 3,
                                  "medium-high": 4,
                                  "high": 5
                                })[parameters.mode] ?? parameters.mode, value
                

                This defines the set_mode action for the capability, preparing it to send a JSON payload. It first sets up an empty object in the value local variable. It then sets the fan key in the object by mapping any words given in the mode parameter to the action back to their letter equivalent for the device. If the value of the mode parameter doesn't map, it's just passed through as given (so you can still use the one-letter values directly if you don't want to use the words). Finally, the object in value is returned as the expression result (that's the , value bit at the end).

                Digging in to that mapping a little more, we're creating a key-value pair object on the fly to use to look the value in parameters.mode. If it matches a key (i.e. left side of a colon), it changes it to the value (the right of the colon). If it matches nothing, the lookup results in null, which is handled by the ?? operator — when given null on its left, it returns the value of the expression on its right (i.e. if the map isn't matched, parameters.mode as given is the result). This is how you can use either the fancy strings or the one-letter values equally.

                Hint: for debugging, when you run an action, MQTTController logs the exact topic and full payload being published at INFO level by default.

                Finally, if you truly wanted to define your own capability, you could make your own Daikin+MQTT custom version of hvac_blower_unit by putting it in a capabilities section of your template file (this does not work in local_mqtt_devices.yaml, only in files in config/mqtt_templates/:

                capabilities:
                  x_mqtt_daikin_moredetail:  # moredetail may include device type, model number, interface type, etc.
                    attributes:
                      speed:
                        type: string
                        values:
                          - A
                          - Q
                          - 1
                          - 2
                          - 3
                          - 4
                          - 5
                    actions:
                      set_speed:
                        arguments:
                          speed:
                            type: string
                            values:
                              - A
                              - Q
                              - 1
                              - 2
                              - 3
                              - 4
                              - 5
                

                This section can just precede the templates: section in your file. You would then adjust the capability name, attribute name, and action and parameters names accordingly in the above example to match your custom definition.

                When you post snippets, please don't redact in a way that disrupts the structure. For example, you removed the topics from under events, and other data in your template. For future readers, that makes your post confusing and misleading, so other people that may find your post because they're having the same problem won't be able to follow it as easily. It would also be a courtesy to those other readers if you posted the final solution, for example the expression you finally came up with for the first problem solved.

                Link to: MQTTController Documentation

                Edit: fix missing expr in example for hvac_blower_unit.mode.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                tunnusT 2 Replies Last reply
                👍
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  @tunnus Kudos! I'm guessing you discovered that something like payload[config.cmd] got you where you were going with that (I'm repeating it here for future readers, since you didn't show your final result).

                  To your next question, first thing: I believe you said you are using local_mqtt_devices.yaml. You'll "modernize" a bit by moving your template to its own file (e.g. daikin.yaml) in config/mqtt_templates/. Within template files in that subdirectory, you can define both custom capabilities and the templates that use them. They are structured more like a package, so you can more easily share them as others here have done.

                  In this case, though, you probably don't need to define your own capability. While the system-defined capabilities have values for attributes and action parameters, they are not set in stone. The defined values are a reasonable subset that a lot of devices may have in common, but there would be no way for me to know the entire range of values for every device that ever was or will be, so Reactor doesn't enforce them. They are mostly hints to the UI for reasonable values it can display for the user as a starting point. You can use your own values for hvac_blower_unit.set_mode without defining your own capability; it won't be a problem as long as your implementation (template) expects those values and handles them.

                  You're on the right track replacing the value_sensor capability with hvac_blower_unit. Using your posted config as a guide, it may look something like below. Let's look at the attributes of the capability first:

                  daikin_command:
                    # some config here, redacted in OP's post
                      capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "hvac_blower_unit" ]
                      primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint
                      events:
                        "some-topic-for-status-I-assume":  # topic was redacted in OP's post
                          # hvac_heating_unit stuff redacted for clarity/focus on hvac_blower_unit
                          "hvac_blower_unit.state":
                            json_payload: true
                            if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                            expr: 'payload?.fan !== "X"'  # whatever expression you need here.
                          "hvac_blower_unit.mode":
                            json_payload: true
                            if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                            expr: payload.fan
                            map:
                              A: auto
                              Q: quiet
                              1: low
                              2: low-medium
                              3: medium
                              4: medium-high
                              5: high
                  

                  What I can't tell from your posts is if there's a value for payload.fan that represents fan off. That would be used to drive the state boolean attribute. You may use an expression like expr: payload?.fan !== "X" Assuming X means off, state will be false when the fan is off, and true when it's running at any speed, which is the intent of the attribute. If the fan is always running or you just don't know (i.e. the device doesn't actually report it), you can forego the if_expr and expr and just supply value: true (or perhaps value: null, meaning "I don't know"), which supplies a fixed value for that attribute that never changes.

                  For hvac_blower_unit.mode, you can see I've mapped the single-character values to strings. This isn't strictly necessary, but it's in keeping with the spirit of Reactor's design goals. Some of the values map to pre-defined values in the capability, and some don't, and that's just fine. It won't bother Reactor at all.

                  Now on the action side, we need to add:

                      actions:
                        hvac_blower_unit:
                          set_mode:
                            topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                            payload:
                              type: json
                              expr: |
                                value = {},
                                value.fan =
                                  ({
                                    "auto": "A",
                                    "quiet": "Q",
                                    "low": 1,
                                    "low-medium": 2,
                                    "medium": 3,
                                    "medium-high": 4,
                                    "high": 5
                                  })[parameters.mode] ?? parameters.mode, value
                  

                  This defines the set_mode action for the capability, preparing it to send a JSON payload. It first sets up an empty object in the value local variable. It then sets the fan key in the object by mapping any words given in the mode parameter to the action back to their letter equivalent for the device. If the value of the mode parameter doesn't map, it's just passed through as given (so you can still use the one-letter values directly if you don't want to use the words). Finally, the object in value is returned as the expression result (that's the , value bit at the end).

                  Digging in to that mapping a little more, we're creating a key-value pair object on the fly to use to look the value in parameters.mode. If it matches a key (i.e. left side of a colon), it changes it to the value (the right of the colon). If it matches nothing, the lookup results in null, which is handled by the ?? operator — when given null on its left, it returns the value of the expression on its right (i.e. if the map isn't matched, parameters.mode as given is the result). This is how you can use either the fancy strings or the one-letter values equally.

                  Hint: for debugging, when you run an action, MQTTController logs the exact topic and full payload being published at INFO level by default.

                  Finally, if you truly wanted to define your own capability, you could make your own Daikin+MQTT custom version of hvac_blower_unit by putting it in a capabilities section of your template file (this does not work in local_mqtt_devices.yaml, only in files in config/mqtt_templates/:

                  capabilities:
                    x_mqtt_daikin_moredetail:  # moredetail may include device type, model number, interface type, etc.
                      attributes:
                        speed:
                          type: string
                          values:
                            - A
                            - Q
                            - 1
                            - 2
                            - 3
                            - 4
                            - 5
                      actions:
                        set_speed:
                          arguments:
                            speed:
                              type: string
                              values:
                                - A
                                - Q
                                - 1
                                - 2
                                - 3
                                - 4
                                - 5
                  

                  This section can just precede the templates: section in your file. You would then adjust the capability name, attribute name, and action and parameters names accordingly in the above example to match your custom definition.

                  When you post snippets, please don't redact in a way that disrupts the structure. For example, you removed the topics from under events, and other data in your template. For future readers, that makes your post confusing and misleading, so other people that may find your post because they're having the same problem won't be able to follow it as easily. It would also be a courtesy to those other readers if you posted the final solution, for example the expression you finally came up with for the first problem solved.

                  Link to: MQTTController Documentation

                  Edit: fix missing expr in example for hvac_blower_unit.mode.

                  tunnusT Online
                  tunnusT Online
                  tunnus
                  wrote on last edited by tunnus
                  #8

                  @toggledbits thanks again! I did left some stuff out, as I thought they were not relevant for the questions at hand, as I was not trying to present how to configure a particular device, but trying to learn how to do something a bit more "advanced" (and that stuff would be visible to others as well).

                  Actually only thing I left out from my "daikin_command" template was power_switch:

                   daikin_command:
                      # also nothing here before capabilities
                      capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "power_switch", "value_sensor" ]
                      primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint    
                      events:
                        "state/%friendly_name%":
                          "power_switch.state":
                            json_payload: true
                            if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.power )'
                            expr: "payload.power ? 'on' : 'off'"
                  ...
                  

                  For clarity, here's that "payload.cmd" final solution (with some extra logic):

                  requires: [cmd]
                      events:
                        "state/%friendly_name%":
                          "power_switch.state":
                            json_payload: true
                            expr: 'config.cmd == "swingv" || config.cmd == "swingh" ? payload.swing : payload[config.cmd]'
                  

                  About "hvac_blower_unit.mode", I think you had forgotten "expr", so I added that, and also "map_default" in case something changes in the other end, and this would continue to work. Also those mapping values were the other way around (something that you could not know).

                        "hvac_blower_unit.mode":
                            json_payload: true
                            if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                            expr: "payload.fan"
                            map:
                              auto: "Auto"
                              night: "Indoor quiet"
                              low: 1
                              lowMedium: 2 
                              medium: 3
                              mediumHigh: 4
                              high: 5 
                            map_default: payload.fan
                  

                  Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                  toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tunnusT tunnus

                    @toggledbits thanks again! I did left some stuff out, as I thought they were not relevant for the questions at hand, as I was not trying to present how to configure a particular device, but trying to learn how to do something a bit more "advanced" (and that stuff would be visible to others as well).

                    Actually only thing I left out from my "daikin_command" template was power_switch:

                     daikin_command:
                        # also nothing here before capabilities
                        capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "power_switch", "value_sensor" ]
                        primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint    
                        events:
                          "state/%friendly_name%":
                            "power_switch.state":
                              json_payload: true
                              if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.power )'
                              expr: "payload.power ? 'on' : 'off'"
                    ...
                    

                    For clarity, here's that "payload.cmd" final solution (with some extra logic):

                    requires: [cmd]
                        events:
                          "state/%friendly_name%":
                            "power_switch.state":
                              json_payload: true
                              expr: 'config.cmd == "swingv" || config.cmd == "swingh" ? payload.swing : payload[config.cmd]'
                    

                    About "hvac_blower_unit.mode", I think you had forgotten "expr", so I added that, and also "map_default" in case something changes in the other end, and this would continue to work. Also those mapping values were the other way around (something that you could not know).

                          "hvac_blower_unit.mode":
                              json_payload: true
                              if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                              expr: "payload.fan"
                              map:
                                auto: "Auto"
                                night: "Indoor quiet"
                                low: 1
                                lowMedium: 2 
                                medium: 3
                                mediumHigh: 4
                                high: 5 
                              map_default: payload.fan
                    
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @tunnus said in MQTT configuration question:

                    About "hvac_blower_unit.mode", I think you had forgotten "expr", so I added that, and also "map_default" in case something changes in the other end, and this would continue to work.

                    Yes, you are correct on expr -- I missed it. I will amend my prior post.

                    map_unmatched is not necessary. The default for map is to leave the value unchanged. And actually, the map_default you provided will result in the default being the string "payload.fan", not the value of the expression payload.fan.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      @tunnus said in MQTT configuration question:

                      About "hvac_blower_unit.mode", I think you had forgotten "expr", so I added that, and also "map_default" in case something changes in the other end, and this would continue to work.

                      Yes, you are correct on expr -- I missed it. I will amend my prior post.

                      map_unmatched is not necessary. The default for map is to leave the value unchanged. And actually, the map_default you provided will result in the default being the string "payload.fan", not the value of the expression payload.fan.

                      tunnusT Online
                      tunnusT Online
                      tunnus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @toggledbits ok, good to know

                      Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        @tunnus Kudos! I'm guessing you discovered that something like payload[config.cmd] got you where you were going with that (I'm repeating it here for future readers, since you didn't show your final result).

                        To your next question, first thing: I believe you said you are using local_mqtt_devices.yaml. You'll "modernize" a bit by moving your template to its own file (e.g. daikin.yaml) in config/mqtt_templates/. Within template files in that subdirectory, you can define both custom capabilities and the templates that use them. They are structured more like a package, so you can more easily share them as others here have done.

                        In this case, though, you probably don't need to define your own capability. While the system-defined capabilities have values for attributes and action parameters, they are not set in stone. The defined values are a reasonable subset that a lot of devices may have in common, but there would be no way for me to know the entire range of values for every device that ever was or will be, so Reactor doesn't enforce them. They are mostly hints to the UI for reasonable values it can display for the user as a starting point. You can use your own values for hvac_blower_unit.set_mode without defining your own capability; it won't be a problem as long as your implementation (template) expects those values and handles them.

                        You're on the right track replacing the value_sensor capability with hvac_blower_unit. Using your posted config as a guide, it may look something like below. Let's look at the attributes of the capability first:

                        daikin_command:
                          # some config here, redacted in OP's post
                            capabilities: [ "hvac_heating_unit", "hvac_blower_unit" ]
                            primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint
                            events:
                              "some-topic-for-status-I-assume":  # topic was redacted in OP's post
                                # hvac_heating_unit stuff redacted for clarity/focus on hvac_blower_unit
                                "hvac_blower_unit.state":
                                  json_payload: true
                                  if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                                  expr: 'payload?.fan !== "X"'  # whatever expression you need here.
                                "hvac_blower_unit.mode":
                                  json_payload: true
                                  if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.fan )'
                                  expr: payload.fan
                                  map:
                                    A: auto
                                    Q: quiet
                                    1: low
                                    2: low-medium
                                    3: medium
                                    4: medium-high
                                    5: high
                        

                        What I can't tell from your posts is if there's a value for payload.fan that represents fan off. That would be used to drive the state boolean attribute. You may use an expression like expr: payload?.fan !== "X" Assuming X means off, state will be false when the fan is off, and true when it's running at any speed, which is the intent of the attribute. If the fan is always running or you just don't know (i.e. the device doesn't actually report it), you can forego the if_expr and expr and just supply value: true (or perhaps value: null, meaning "I don't know"), which supplies a fixed value for that attribute that never changes.

                        For hvac_blower_unit.mode, you can see I've mapped the single-character values to strings. This isn't strictly necessary, but it's in keeping with the spirit of Reactor's design goals. Some of the values map to pre-defined values in the capability, and some don't, and that's just fine. It won't bother Reactor at all.

                        Now on the action side, we need to add:

                            actions:
                              hvac_blower_unit:
                                set_mode:
                                  topic: "command/%friendly_name%"
                                  payload:
                                    type: json
                                    expr: |
                                      value = {},
                                      value.fan =
                                        ({
                                          "auto": "A",
                                          "quiet": "Q",
                                          "low": 1,
                                          "low-medium": 2,
                                          "medium": 3,
                                          "medium-high": 4,
                                          "high": 5
                                        })[parameters.mode] ?? parameters.mode, value
                        

                        This defines the set_mode action for the capability, preparing it to send a JSON payload. It first sets up an empty object in the value local variable. It then sets the fan key in the object by mapping any words given in the mode parameter to the action back to their letter equivalent for the device. If the value of the mode parameter doesn't map, it's just passed through as given (so you can still use the one-letter values directly if you don't want to use the words). Finally, the object in value is returned as the expression result (that's the , value bit at the end).

                        Digging in to that mapping a little more, we're creating a key-value pair object on the fly to use to look the value in parameters.mode. If it matches a key (i.e. left side of a colon), it changes it to the value (the right of the colon). If it matches nothing, the lookup results in null, which is handled by the ?? operator — when given null on its left, it returns the value of the expression on its right (i.e. if the map isn't matched, parameters.mode as given is the result). This is how you can use either the fancy strings or the one-letter values equally.

                        Hint: for debugging, when you run an action, MQTTController logs the exact topic and full payload being published at INFO level by default.

                        Finally, if you truly wanted to define your own capability, you could make your own Daikin+MQTT custom version of hvac_blower_unit by putting it in a capabilities section of your template file (this does not work in local_mqtt_devices.yaml, only in files in config/mqtt_templates/:

                        capabilities:
                          x_mqtt_daikin_moredetail:  # moredetail may include device type, model number, interface type, etc.
                            attributes:
                              speed:
                                type: string
                                values:
                                  - A
                                  - Q
                                  - 1
                                  - 2
                                  - 3
                                  - 4
                                  - 5
                            actions:
                              set_speed:
                                arguments:
                                  speed:
                                    type: string
                                    values:
                                      - A
                                      - Q
                                      - 1
                                      - 2
                                      - 3
                                      - 4
                                      - 5
                        

                        This section can just precede the templates: section in your file. You would then adjust the capability name, attribute name, and action and parameters names accordingly in the above example to match your custom definition.

                        When you post snippets, please don't redact in a way that disrupts the structure. For example, you removed the topics from under events, and other data in your template. For future readers, that makes your post confusing and misleading, so other people that may find your post because they're having the same problem won't be able to follow it as easily. It would also be a courtesy to those other readers if you posted the final solution, for example the expression you finally came up with for the first problem solved.

                        Link to: MQTTController Documentation

                        Edit: fix missing expr in example for hvac_blower_unit.mode.

                        tunnusT Online
                        tunnusT Online
                        tunnus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Hint: for debugging, when you run an action, MQTTController logs the exact topic and full payload being published at INFO level by default.

                        I've used MQTTX, which I can highly recommend

                        Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • tunnusT tunnus marked this topic as a question on
                        • tunnusT tunnus has marked this topic as solved on
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Recent Topics

                        • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                          M
                          mgvra
                          1
                          3
                          66

                        • Script action and custom timers
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          4
                          85

                        • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          12
                          241

                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          5
                          128
                          72.9k

                        • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                          akbooerA
                          akbooer
                          1
                          2
                          87

                        • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          6
                          90

                        • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          17
                          308

                        • Shelly Wall Display XL
                          akbooerA
                          akbooer
                          2
                          9
                          698

                        • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          26
                          534

                        • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          12
                          382

                        • No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          2
                          90

                        • Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          2
                          129
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Unsolved