Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] Group in Reset Reaction is being ignored
Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] Group in Reset Reaction is being ignored

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
7 Posts 2 Posters 1.1k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 3 Offline
    3 Offline
    3rdStng
    wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
    #1

    They say plagiarism is the best form of flattery, right? Or something like that. Thanks go to @gwp1 for the great title of this subject. I'm trying to get into using the new (to me) group option within the Set and Reset Reactions. I have the Set action working beautifully, however my reset reaction is not. What I am after, which maybe this isn't even possible, is one rule for the motion sensed in my garage. Upon motion, and it night time, turn on the lights. And upon no motion, and no motion for 10 minutes, turn off the lights.

    MSR Docker on unRAID: latest-22293
    Hubitat 2.3.3.137
    HaaS 2022.10.4

    Trigger:
    If motion is detected by either sensor

    Set Reaction:
    Only turn the lights on between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise.

    Reset Reaction: (I've tried a few variations, each with conditional options set.)
    Tried: Both Motion sensors, in an AND group or individually as an AND, are False and sustained false for 10 minutes.
    Tried: Rule State (this rule itself) is False and sustained false for 10 minutes.

    Basically the additional condition I am putting into the Reset Reaction group is being ignored and as soon as either motion sensors is false from it's normal reset time, the lights turn off. I would like to have a 10 minute delay before the lights go off. In case I'm moving around and re-trigger a sensor. Are additional conditions allowed within the Reset Group option? Or am I way off and should just break this into two rules? One for on and one for off?

    EDIT: Forgot to include my reasoning for not putting the Delay reset for 600 within the Trigger. I want the garage lights to come on again, if they are off, after the motion sensors native timeout has reset. For example, if I go in the garage, the lights automatically turn on. When I leave the garage, I will turn them off. But if I return within 2 minutes, and less than 10 minutes, turn the lights back on again for me.

    5cd34edf-11b0-4929-9841-2f635c761881-image.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      Yeah, that's not how you do that. The Reset reaction runs as soon as your triggers go false. What you really need to do is keep your triggers from going false too early. Your motion sensors have a reset period that is shorter than your ten minute wish (that is, they signal no motion on their own timing, which appears to be shorter than 10 minutes, not at all unusual), so you need to stretch out that time.

      Since you already have your triggers in an OR group, this will be easy. Just open the condition options for your OR group, and in the "Follow" section for "delay reset", add a 600 second delay. This is a resettable delay that will restart every time motion is detected, so if motion is detected during the 10 minute delay, the delay will restart anew, keeping the lights on until there is truly no motion detected for 10 minutes.

      Your Reset reaction can then just turn the lights off; it needs nothing else (no groups or constraints — remove those).

      Edit: to be specific about the reason your Reset reaction doesn't work as you've shown it, as I said, when both motion sensors no longer signal motion, that OR trigger group goes false, and the Reset reaction runs. Since you have a group with constraints, the first thing that happens is that Reactor checks to see if the constraints have been met, and in Reactor's view, your constraint is "Garage - on" (rule) has been false for 10 minutes; there's no way it can be at that moment, and Reactor isn't going to stop there and wait for that to be true; that's not how constraints work. The constraint test is instantaneous, and Reactor only runs the group actions if the constraint conditions are true in that instant. Reactor sees they are not, so skips the power off actions and the Reset reaction is then done working. Reactor will not run it again when the constraint is satisfied, because again, that's not how constraints work.

      Edit 2: Also, please don't reuse/plagiarize another existing thread's title. That's really confusing for people searching later, or even reading now. A better and more specific title (for both of those posts) would be appreciated. Post titles should be more descriptive of the problem. Refer to the posting guidelines for examples.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      3 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        Yeah, that's not how you do that. The Reset reaction runs as soon as your triggers go false. What you really need to do is keep your triggers from going false too early. Your motion sensors have a reset period that is shorter than your ten minute wish (that is, they signal no motion on their own timing, which appears to be shorter than 10 minutes, not at all unusual), so you need to stretch out that time.

        Since you already have your triggers in an OR group, this will be easy. Just open the condition options for your OR group, and in the "Follow" section for "delay reset", add a 600 second delay. This is a resettable delay that will restart every time motion is detected, so if motion is detected during the 10 minute delay, the delay will restart anew, keeping the lights on until there is truly no motion detected for 10 minutes.

        Your Reset reaction can then just turn the lights off; it needs nothing else (no groups or constraints — remove those).

        Edit: to be specific about the reason your Reset reaction doesn't work as you've shown it, as I said, when both motion sensors no longer signal motion, that OR trigger group goes false, and the Reset reaction runs. Since you have a group with constraints, the first thing that happens is that Reactor checks to see if the constraints have been met, and in Reactor's view, your constraint is "Garage - on" (rule) has been false for 10 minutes; there's no way it can be at that moment, and Reactor isn't going to stop there and wait for that to be true; that's not how constraints work. The constraint test is instantaneous, and Reactor only runs the group actions if the constraint conditions are true in that instant. Reactor sees they are not, so skips the power off actions and the Reset reaction is then done working. Reactor will not run it again when the constraint is satisfied, because again, that's not how constraints work.

        Edit 2: Also, please don't reuse/plagiarize another existing thread's title. That's really confusing for people searching later, or even reading now. A better and more specific title (for both of those posts) would be appreciated. Post titles should be more descriptive of the problem. Refer to the posting guidelines for examples.

        3 Offline
        3 Offline
        3rdStng
        wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
        #3

        Thank you for the very detailed explanation. I haven't really dove into constraints before and clearly I need to so I understand them better.

        @toggledbits said in Group in Reset Reaction is being ignored:

        open the condition options for your OR group, and in the "Follow" section for "delay reset", add a 600 second delay. This is a resettable delay that will restart every time motion is detected, so if motion is detected during the 10 minute delay, the delay will restart anew

        This is exactly how I have all my Motion rules defined. And they work as expected. But in this particular rule, I want the Set reaction to trigger again if it detected motion by either sensor after their timeout and before the 10 minute reset delay within MSR.

        Use case: I enter the garage, the lights turn on. I leave the garage and manually turn the lights off. (Assuming there is a 10 minute delay reset defined) I return to the garage 2 minutes later, the sensors detect movement, I would like the lights to turn back on.

        With the 10 minute reset delay defined, MSR will see the rule still as true at that 2 minute mark and not fire the Set reaction again, correct?

        @toggledbits said in Group in Reset Reaction is being ignored:

        please don't reuse/plagiarize another existing thread's title

        I will fix this.

        EDIT: If the solution for this is to have two rules, I am perfectly fine with that. I just happened to see that Groups were an option within the reactions now and was determining if there is a way to consolidate rules. But if I need an ON and and OFF rule, I'm good with that.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          OK. Then I think two rules will probably be the easiest way.

          Your "On" rule is simple then... either sensor senses motion (OR group with two conditions as before), turn on the light in the Set reaction. No constraints, delays, etc., and no reset reaction, in this rule.

          Your "Off" rule is an AND group with two conditions: the light is on (Entity Attribute condition) AND the "On" rule has been false for 10 minutes (sustained for delay on a Rule State condition looking at the "On" rule with the is FALSE operator). Set reaction turns the light off.

          Any time motion is sensed, the "On" rule will turn on the light (harmless if it's already on). If the light is on and the "On" rule hasn't seen anything for 10 minutes, the "Off" rule triggers and turns off the light. If you turn off the light manually, and then go back in the room a moment later, the "On" rule will turn the light back on.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          3 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            OK. Then I think two rules will probably be the easiest way.

            Your "On" rule is simple then... either sensor senses motion (OR group with two conditions as before), turn on the light in the Set reaction. No constraints, delays, etc., and no reset reaction, in this rule.

            Your "Off" rule is an AND group with two conditions: the light is on (Entity Attribute condition) AND the "On" rule has been false for 10 minutes (sustained for delay on a Rule State condition looking at the "On" rule with the is FALSE operator). Set reaction turns the light off.

            Any time motion is sensed, the "On" rule will turn on the light (harmless if it's already on). If the light is on and the "On" rule hasn't seen anything for 10 minutes, the "Off" rule triggers and turns off the light. If you turn off the light manually, and then go back in the room a moment later, the "On" rule will turn the light back on.

            3 Offline
            3 Offline
            3rdStng
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits I like your off rule. It is a different approach than what I have. The end result of both is the same though.

            My off rule has the sensors in an AND group (when the sensor is true) with a delay reset of 10 minutes. There is no Set reaction. Only a reset reaction to turn the light off.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Not sure you want an AND group with that construction... it requires both sensors to detect motion for the group to be true at the same time. That may be right a lot of the time, but I'll bet it's not some of the time...

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              3 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                Not sure you want an AND group with that construction... it requires both sensors to detect motion for the group to be true at the same time. That may be right a lot of the time, but I'll bet it's not some of the time...

                3 Offline
                3 Offline
                3rdStng
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @toggledbits You are correct. I had an extra motion sensor and was planning on putting it on the opposite side. While I was testing, with three sensors in the AND group, it dawned on me that all three would have to have triggered and gone false for this to work. This won't happen if you only enter the garage a few feet and never to the other side. I ended up creating my rules exactly how your example was and it's working great. Thanks for the insight and example.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                Recent Topics

                • Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                  CrilleC
                  Crille
                  0
                  1
                  22

                • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                  G
                  gwp1
                  0
                  6
                  65

                • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  5
                  129
                  73.6k

                • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  1
                  1
                  45

                • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                  M
                  mgvra
                  1
                  3
                  114

                • Script action and custom timers
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  4
                  134

                • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  0
                  12
                  357

                • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                  akbooerA
                  akbooer
                  1
                  2
                  108

                • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                  CrilleC
                  Crille
                  0
                  6
                  146

                • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  17
                  438

                • Shelly Wall Display XL
                  akbooerA
                  akbooer
                  2
                  9
                  784

                • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  26
                  789
                Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Unsolved