Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC.
Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc.
Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box?
Thanks.
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration
This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something?
Cheers
C
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration:
users:
# This section defines your valid users.
admin: *******
groups:
# This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application
# and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to
# more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here.
admin_group:
users:
- admin
applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications
guests:
users: "*"
applications:
- dashboard
api_acls:
# This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API
- url: "/api"
group: admin_group
allow: true
log: true
# This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint
- url: "/api/v1/alive"
allow: true
session:
timeout: 7200 # (seconds)
rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true
# If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged.
log_acls: true
# If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged.
debug_acls: true
My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules.
I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds).
Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off?
With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches.
Thanks
Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7
VirtualEntityController v25356
Synology Docker
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future.
In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level.
Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way.
I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption.
A few other things to know:
If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc.
Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy).
The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON.
You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach).
The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case.
This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change.
This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks.
Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option?
No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices
Cheers
C
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions;
Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating;
Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later;
Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase;
Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions;
Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases);
Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Good evening all,
For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time.
Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed.
Thanks.
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations.
Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction?
Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for.
I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue.
TIA!
C
[ZwaveJS] Position and cover not working for Roller Shutter 1/2/3
-
Pull the latest build (new) and try it.
-
"It's not working" isn't actionable. You know what I need.
-
Ok, here we go.
In details:- OK: cover.close/open
- KO: cover.stop, position.*
Taken from zwawejs.log
[latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:54:29.867Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing cover.open on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:54:29.869Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs action cover.open set node 4 endpoint 0 value 38:targetValue:(undefined) = 99 [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:54:29.871Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting value [Object]{ "command": "node.set_value", "nodeId": 4, "valueId": { "endpoint": 0, "commandClass": 38, "property": "targetValue" }, "value": 99 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:54:33.806Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing cover.close on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:54:33.808Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs action cover.close set node 4 endpoint 0 value 38:targetValue:(undefined) = 0 [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:54:33.809Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting value [Object]{ "command": "node.set_value", "nodeId": 4, "valueId": { "endpoint": 0, "commandClass": 38, "property": "targetValue" }, "value": 0 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:54:36.322Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing cover.open on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:54:36.323Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs action cover.open set node 4 endpoint 0 value 38:targetValue:(undefined) = 99 [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:54:36.323Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting value [Object]{ "command": "node.set_value", "nodeId": 4, "valueId": { "endpoint": 0, "commandClass": 38, "property": "targetValue" }, "value": 99 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:55:02.507Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing position.increase on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ "amount": 0.1 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:55:04.523Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing position.increase on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ "amount": 0.1 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:55:10.073Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing position.relative on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ "amount": 0.5 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T14:55:13.023Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing position.set on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ "value": 0.3 } -
Class B doesn't have position, per Z-Wave specs. So that's the manufacturer providing the wrong device class data. Fibaro does a lot of this. Their firmware is trash. Also, this is a different device than previously reported (node 4 vs node 148), so you are moving the goal posts on me. So go back to 148 and tell me what's going on there, then we'll worry about 4 (different version of similar device).
Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.
-
Class B doesn't have position, per Z-Wave specs. So that's the manufacturer providing the wrong device class data. Fibaro does a lot of this. Their firmware is trash. Also, this is a different device than previously reported (node 4 vs node 148), so you are moving the goal posts on me. So go back to 148 and tell me what's going on there, then we'll worry about 4 (different version of similar device).
@toggledbits sorry. node 148 is working as expected. this is a RS3. node 4 is a RS2.
here's node 4:
cover.state=true energy_sensor.units="kWh" energy_sensor.value=6.58 position.value=null power_sensor.units="W" power_sensor.value=0 power_switch.state=true x_debug.dt={"0":769,"1":4097,"entity_class":"Cover","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=17;deviceClass.specific.key=6","capabilities":["cover","toggle","position"],"primary_attribute":"cover.state","manufacturerId":271,"productType":770,"productId":4096} x_zwave_values.Binary_Switch_currentValue=true x_zwave_values.Binary_Switch_targetValue=null x_zwave_values.Configuration_Delay_Time_After_S2=10 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Energy_Reports=10 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Forced_Roller_Shutter_Calibration=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Lamellas_Positioning_Mode=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Managing_Lamellas_in_Response_to_Alarm=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Motor_Operation_Detection=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Motor_Operation_Time=240 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Periodic_Power_or_Energy_Reports=3600 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Power_Reports=10 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Reports_Type=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Response_to_General_Alarm=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Response_to_Smoke_CO_CO2_Alarm=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Response_to_Temperature_Alarm=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Response_to_Water_Flood_Alarm=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Roller_Shutter_Operating_Modes=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Scenes_Associations_Activation=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Self_Measurement=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Switch_Type=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Turning_Time_Delay_Time=150 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Proprietary_fibaro_venetianBlindsPosition=99 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=271 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=4096 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=770 x_zwave_values.Meter_reset=null x_zwave_values.Meter_value_65537=6.58 x_zwave_values.Meter_value_66049=0 x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Sensor_Power=0 x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_Close=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_Open=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_currentValue=99 x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_duration=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_restorePrevious=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_targetValue=99 x_zwave_values.Protection_exclusiveControlNodeId=null x_zwave_values.Protection_local=0 x_zwave_values.Protection_rf=0 x_zwave_values.Protection_timeout=null x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["25.25"] x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=3 x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="3.52" zwave_device.capabilities=[37,38,49,50,112,114,117,134,145] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=false zwave_device.generic_class="Multilevel Switch" zwave_device.impl_sig="24233:1:24233:1" zwave_device.is_beaming=false zwave_device.is_listening=true zwave_device.is_routing=true zwave_device.is_secure=false zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[271,770,4096] zwave_device.max_data_rate=null zwave_device.node_id=4 zwave_device.specific_class="Motor Control Class B" zwave_device.status=4 zwave_device.status_text="alive" zwave_device.version_info=[null,"25.25"] -
Here's node 148 for reference:
cover.state=true energy_sensor.units="kWh" energy_sensor.value=0.41 position.value=0.92 power_sensor.units="W" power_sensor.value=0 x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Cover","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=17;deviceClass.specific.key=6","capabilities":["cover","toggle","position"],"primary_attribute":"cover.state","description":"Roller Shutter 3","model":"FGR223","default_name":"Roller Shutter 3","values":[{"match":{"endpoint":[1,2],"commandClass":38,"property":"currentValue"},"entity_class":"Cover","primary_attribute":"cover.state","capabilities":{"cover":{"attributes":{"state":{"expr":"value !== 0"}},"actions":{"open":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":99},"close":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":0},"stop":{"valueId":"+Up:","value":false}}},"position":{"attributes":{"value":{"expr":"round( value / 99, 2 )"}},"actions":{"set":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( parameters.value ?# 0 ), 0 ) ) )"}},"increase":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"decrease":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) - ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"relative":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}}}},"toggle":{"actions":{"toggle":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":{"expr":"entity.attributes.cover.state ? 0 : 99"}}}}}}],"manufacturerId":271,"productType":771,"productId":4096} x_zwave_values.Meter_reset=null x_zwave_values.Meter_value_65537=0.41 x_zwave_values.Meter_value_66049=0 x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_Down=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_Up=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_currentValue=91 x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_duration="unknown" x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_restorePrevious=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_targetValue=91 x_zwave_values.Notification_Power_Management_Over_current_status=0 x_zwave_values.Notification_System_Hardware_status=0 x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmLevel=null x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmType=null zwave_device.capabilities=[38,50,113] zwave_device.endpoint=1 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.impl_sig="24233:1:24233:1" zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=148 zwave_device.version_info=null -
OK. That's easy to fix, I think. Pull the updated
zwavejs_data.zipfile from the server and put in yourconfigdirectory, restart Reactor, and let's see if 4 behaves better (I just applied the exceptions for the 223 to the 222, adjusted for a single endpoint). -
Still not working. position.value is still null.
Logs:
[latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:14.892Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing position.relative on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ "amount": 0.5 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:20.349Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing position.relative on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ "amount": 0.5 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:29.900Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing cover.close on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:29.901Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs action cover.close set node 4 endpoint 0 value 38:targetValue:(undefined) = 0 [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:29.903Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting value [Object]{ "command": "node.set_value", "nodeId": 4, "valueId": { "endpoint": 0, "commandClass": 38, "property": "targetValue" }, "value": 0 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:32.172Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing cover.close on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:32.173Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs action cover.close set node 4 endpoint 0 value 38:targetValue:(undefined) = 0 [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:32.174Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting value [Object]{ "command": "node.set_value", "nodeId": 4, "valueId": { "endpoint": 0, "commandClass": 38, "property": "targetValue" }, "value": 0 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:34.602Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing cover.stop on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:36.567Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing cover.open on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:36.568Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs action cover.open set node 4 endpoint 0 value 38:targetValue:(undefined) = 99 [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:36.570Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting value [Object]{ "command": "node.set_value", "nodeId": 4, "valueId": { "endpoint": 0, "commandClass": 38, "property": "targetValue" }, "value": 99 } [latest-24212]2024-08-20T15:19:45.548Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing position.relative on Cover#zwavejs>4-0 with [Object]{ "amount": 0.5 } -
OK. You're talking about an attribute, but showing me actions in a log. On my system, the FGR222 is now showing position.value correctly for any value in range.
Here's what my log looks like (position.set to 0.45 on device 4, using your configuration):
[###BUILDVERSION###]2024-08-20T15:25:04.586Z <ZWaveJSController#zwstatic:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwstatic performing position.set on Cover#zwstatic>4-0 with [Object]{ "value": 0.45 } [###BUILDVERSION###]2024-08-20T15:25:04.587Z <ZWaveJSController#zwstatic:5:ZWaveJSController.js:2135> ZWaveJSController#zwstatic def [Object]{ "endpoint": 0, "commandClass": 38, "property": "currentValue", "propertyKey": --undef--, "impl": { "valueId": "+targetValue:#", "value": { "expr": "max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( parameters.value ?# 0 ), 0 ) ) )" } } } [###BUILDVERSION###]2024-08-20T15:25:04.591Z <ZWaveJSController#zwstatic:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwstatic action position.set set node 4 endpoint 0 value 38:targetValue:(null) = 45 [###BUILDVERSION###]2024-08-20T15:25:04.593Z <ZWaveJSController#zwstatic:5:ZWaveJSController.js:1760> ZWaveJSController#zwstatic _set_value(4,0,38,targetValue,(null),45) [###BUILDVERSION###]2024-08-20T15:25:04.594Z <ZWaveJSController#zwstatic:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwstatic setting value [Object]{ "command": "node.set_value", "nodeId": 4, "valueId": { "endpoint": 0, "commandClass": 38, "property": "targetValue" }, "value": 45 } [###BUILDVERSION###]2024-08-20T15:25:04.596Z <ZWaveJSController#zwstatic:5:ZWaveJSController.js:335> ZWaveJSController#zwstatic sending #1724167504595<8/20/2024, 11:25:04 AM>: [Object]{ "command": "node.set_value", "nodeId": 4, "valueId": { "endpoint": 0, "commandClass": 38, "property": "targetValue" }, "value": 45, "messageId": 1724167504595 }So both are working for me. I would try deleting the entity in MSR and restarting to recreate it. Then test again.
-
What is the
impl_sigattribute on device 4? -
Are you using position.set directly, or using the relative actions?
-
That's wonderful. I have a FGR222 (previous fw) that's working. Here's node 3:
cover.state=false energy_sensor.units="kWh" energy_sensor.value=0 position.value=0 power_sensor.units="W" power_sensor.value=0 power_switch.state=true x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Cover","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=17;deviceClass.specific.key=6","capabilities":["cover","toggle","position"],"primary_attribute":"cover.state","description":"Roller Shutter","model":"FGRM222","default_name":"Roller Shutter","values":[{"match":{"commandClass":38,"property":"currentValue"},"capabilities":{"cover":{"attributes":{"state":{"expr":"value !== 0"}},"actions":{"open":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":99},"close":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":0},"stop":{"valueId":"+Up:","value":false}}},"position":{"attributes":{"value":{"expr":"round( value / 99, 2 )"}},"actions":{"set":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( parameters.value ?# 0 ), 0 ) ) )"}},"increase":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"decrease":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) - ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"relative":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}}}},"toggle":{"actions":{"toggle":{"valueId":"+targetValue:#","value":{"expr":"entity.attributes.cover.state ? 0 : 99"}}}}}}],"manufacturerId":271,"productType":769,"productId":4097} x_zwave_values.Binary_Switch_currentValue=true x_zwave_values.Binary_Switch_targetValue=null x_zwave_values.Configuration_Delay_Time_After_S2=10 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Energy_Reports=10 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Forced_Roller_Shutter_Calibration=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Lamellas_Positioning_Mode=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Managing_Lamellas_in_Response_to_Alarm=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Motor_Operation_Detection=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Motor_Operation_Time=240 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Periodic_Power_or_Energy_Reports=3600 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Power_Reports=10 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Reports_Type=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Response_to_General_Alarm=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Response_to_Smoke_CO_CO2_Alarm=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Response_to_Temperature_Alarm=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Response_to_Water_Flood_Alarm=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Roller_Shutter_Operating_Modes=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Scenes_Associations_Activation=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Self_Measurement=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Switch_Type=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Turning_Time_Delay_Time=150 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Proprietary_fibaro_venetianBlindsPosition=99 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=271 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=4097 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=769 x_zwave_values.Meter_reset=null x_zwave_values.Meter_value_65537=0 x_zwave_values.Meter_value_66049=0 x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Sensor_Power=0 x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_Close=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_Open=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_currentValue=0 x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_duration=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_restorePrevious=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_targetValue=0 x_zwave_values.Protection_exclusiveControlNodeId=null x_zwave_values.Protection_local=0 x_zwave_values.Protection_rf=0 x_zwave_values.Protection_timeout=null x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["24.24"] x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=3 x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="3.52" zwave_device.capabilities=[37,38,49,50,112,114,117,134,145] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=false zwave_device.generic_class="Multilevel Switch" zwave_device.impl_sig="24233:1:24233:2" zwave_device.is_beaming=false zwave_device.is_listening=true zwave_device.is_routing=true zwave_device.is_secure=false zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[271,769,4097] zwave_device.max_data_rate=null zwave_device.node_id=3 zwave_device.specific_class="Motor Control Class B" zwave_device.status=4 zwave_device.status_text="alive" zwave_device.version_info=[null,"24.24"] -
OK. I think I see it. #4 has a different type and ID, and the alias has an error. Pull the new data ZIP and try again.
-
That did the trick. Two things.
position.valueis now incosistent, whereas dimming.level was ok before. I tried to set node 4 to .9, and it's now reporting .31. A refresh is updating the position (to .91), but nowpower_switch.state=null.power_sensor.valueis still 0. -
What are you comparing it to? For node 4, the last data you show have the Meter class value (meterType 1, property
value, propertyKey 66049) at 0, and the Multilevel Sensor withsensorType=4 (Power) also 0. What are you expecting the value to be? Again, can you show more context, too? Post all the attributes? These things are moving targets, so more data is better than less.