Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Device log?
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Device log?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
2 Posts 2 Posters 34 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    @toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device?

    I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HASS 2025.11.1
    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
    FW: v1.1
    SDK: v7.23.1

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Online
      toggledbitsT Online
      toggledbits
      wrote last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      You list Hubitat and HASS as hubs, and the default logging for both of these hubs should tell you what you need to know. I've tried to keep these messages fairly consistent across the controllers, generally in this form:

      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:08.121Z <xxx:INFO> xxx#house perform power_switch.set on Switch#house>device_396 with { "state": false }
      

      Search using the canonical entity ID. There are several capabilities that can turn a light on, so searching by capability is harder. The idea is to find a perform ??? on ??? with ??? at the right time with the right entity ID.

      From there, start looking backwards for a message like either one of these:

      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:00.100Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Parking Area Light Off (re-lk5lrx5a)
      
          or 
      
      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:08.121Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Parking Area Light Off (re-lk5lrx5a) from step 3
      

      If this line is within just a couple of lines, maybe even directly before, the perform log entry you found above, then that's the name of the Reaction that manipulated the device. If that has :S or :R at the end of its ID and the tag <SET> or <RESET> appended to the Reaction name, the Reaction is part of a Rule with that ID and name, and that is the rule that is manipulating the entity — you're done!

      If the Reaction ID doesn't have the :S or :R suffix, then the Reaction is not rule-based (e.g. it's a global reaction), and you need to find what launched it.

      If the line you've found is of the form Resuming "<reaction name>" (reaction id)" from step n, then keep looking backwards. You may find more Resuming lines for other steps of the same reaction, but your goal now is to find the line that looks like Starting "<reaction name>" (reaction id).

      Once you are on the Starting "<reaction name>" (reaction id) line, you should not have to look very far to find an Enqueuing "<reaction name>" (reaction id) line.

      Once you are on the Enqueueing line, you should not have to look very far to find another Resuming or Starting reaction line. This line may have the :S and :R on the reaction ID that you are looking for to indicate the rule that launched the reaction. If it doesn't, then the reaction was launched by another reaction, and you just repeat the above process looking for what started this reaction. This path will eventually lead to the responsible rule.

      Live example from my host this morning. The perform action we found above is for an outdoor flood light that lights a parking pad at my house. It got turned off. By what, though? Well, we already established that is was by a reaction called Parking Area Light Off because we found a Resuming line for that reaction right before the perform line for the entity. Let's keep digging to find the responsible rule. Here's are some more relevant lines from my log:

      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:00.067Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Morning Lighting Off<SET>" (rule-knjifbn1:S)
      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:00.078Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Morning Lighting Off<SET> (rule-knjifbn1:S)
      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:00.078Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Outdoor All Off" (re-kl73syb6)
      .
      .
      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:00.088Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Outdoor All Off (re-kl73syb6)
      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:00.089Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Parking Area Light Off" (re-lk5lrx5a)
      .
      .
      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:00.100Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Parking Area Light Off (re-lk5lrx5a)
      .
      .
      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:00.118Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Parking Area Light Off (re-lk5lrx5a) from step 2
      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:00.119Z <Engine:NOTICE> Parking Area Light Off delaying until 1764074708119<11/25/2025, 7:45:08 AM>
      .
      .
      [...]2025-11-25T12:45:08.121Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Parking Area Light Off (re-lk5lrx5a) from step 3
      

      Working backwards from the last line, which is the Resuming line that we found earlier (step 3), we find a Resuming line for the previous step (2) of that same reaction at 12:45:00.118. Notice also that reaction had a delay in it that was logged immediately after, which accounts for the time gap between steps 2 and 3.

      Keep going backwards to 12:45:00.100 and we find the Starting line for that Parking Area Light Off reaction. And continuing to look backwards for that same reaction ID, we eventually find the Enqueueing line for it (12:45:00.089). Usually these two lines are pretty close together, but it's not usual to have other things logged between.

      Now just looking backward line by line (not searching for any ID here), we soon find a Starting reaction Outdoor All Off line (12:45:00.088) very close to our Enqueueing line, indicating that Outdoor All Off launched the Parking Area Light Off reaction.

      Now we just repeat this process with Outdoor All Off — find it enqueued at 12:45:00.078 by Morning Light Off<SET> also at 12:45:00.078. The <SET> on the name and :S on the ID means it's a rule reaction, so Morning Light Off is the rule that triggered and started the sequence of two other reactions that eventually turned off the light.

      So to recap:

      1. Find the perform line (search using entity ID) that occurs at about the right time.
      2. Look backwards a short distance and you will find either a Starting <reaction> or Resuming <reaction> line. If that's a rule's SET or RESET reaction, you've found the responsible rule. Otherwise, a global reaction manipulated the entity/device, so proceed to the next step.
      3. Find what launched the current reaction. Keep looking backward until you find the Enqueueing line for it. Then very shortly preceding it, you should find a Starting <reaction> or Resuming <reaction> line for a different reaction. That's what started the current reaction. If this new reaction is a rule's SET or RESET reaction, you've found the responsible rule. Otherwise, find what launched this new (global) reaction by repeating this step.

      NOTE: Almost all actions in Reactor are asynchronous, meaning the Engine launches them in a separate process and the Engine can move on to working on a different reaction if multiple are running concurrently. Some in particular can take a lot of time (like HTTP Request). Depending on how busy your system is in that moment, all of these lines can be separated by other lines for other things going on, and you have to be careful and patient sifting through them.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      Recent Topics

      • Is there a way to turn this section (image in post) off?
        toggledbitsT
        toggledbits
        0
        1
        2

      • Device log?
        toggledbitsT
        toggledbits
        0
        2
        34

      • Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
        tunnusT
        tunnus
        0
        3
        37

      • Error: Command timeout
        G
        gwp1
        0
        6
        124

      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
        toggledbitsT
        toggledbits
        5
        131
        74.8k

      • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
        CrilleC
        Crille
        0
        5
        208

      • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
        G
        gwp1
        0
        6
        230

      • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
        toggledbitsT
        toggledbits
        1
        1
        88

      • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
        M
        mgvra
        1
        3
        185

      • Script action and custom timers
        toggledbitsT
        toggledbits
        0
        4
        200

      • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
        CatmanV2C
        CatmanV2
        0
        12
        514

      • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
        akbooerA
        akbooer
        1
        2
        152
      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Unsolved