Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Vera device extended attributes ?
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor

Vera device extended attributes ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
38 Posts 3 Posters 5.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    @cw-kid said in Vera device extended attributes ?:

    How are Vera extended attributes meant to work in Triggers ?

    Like any other attribute, although the one you chose to highlight there (mapped_by) is for my debugging and probably useful to nobody else.

    Because Vera has so many state variables for some devices, it's not reasonable to map and copy them all right out of the gate. It would be overwhelming to most new users. If there's something you need to get to, you just need to let me know. It's really a big part of the purpose of this phase: discovering both what devices, and what data in those devices, are the most-used.

    When I fill out the per-user device configuration, you'll be able yourself to pull data that isn't published by default, enable or disable an action a specific device can perform, or even create your own mapping entirely for a device that doesn't yet have one. Future stuff.

    I'll get the comm failure variable mapped for you today.

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cw-kidC Offline
      cw-kidC Offline
      cw-kid
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      OK thanks that sounds great.

      I have two problem motion sensors in Vera and it says "Can't Detect Device" in the UI7 GUI, for no obvious reason as the motion sensors still function fine.

      In PLEG I currently just monitor for their CommFailure = 1 and set it back to 0.

      Its a fudge fix for Vera being crap at handling these motion sensors, seems a later firmware update at some point in time made this happen, as it never happened in the past and those sensors never use to say "Can't Detect Device".

      rafale77R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cw-kidC cw-kid

        OK thanks that sounds great.

        I have two problem motion sensors in Vera and it says "Can't Detect Device" in the UI7 GUI, for no obvious reason as the motion sensors still function fine.

        In PLEG I currently just monitor for their CommFailure = 1 and set it back to 0.

        Its a fudge fix for Vera being crap at handling these motion sensors, seems a later firmware update at some point in time made this happen, as it never happened in the past and those sensors never use to say "Can't Detect Device".

        rafale77R Offline
        rafale77R Offline
        rafale77
        wrote on last edited by rafale77
        #4

        @cw-kid said in Vera device extended attributes ?:

        Its a fudge fix for Vera being crap at handling these motion sensors, seems a later firmware update at some point in time made this happen, as it never happened in the past and those sensors never use to say "Can't Detect Device".

        The vera will flag battery operated devices it fails to receive a wakeup signal for a time >2x the wakeup interval. It is a common behavior in controllers and I don't think it is new. You should see complains about this from the beginning of vera. I thought I had suggested to vera dev to change this behavior to run this flag so as not to only consider the wakeup packets but all packets as the "last alive" time to eliminate exclusive dependency on the wakeup process. I guess I was ignored. If I remember correctly made the same suggestion to z-wave.me and it got quickly implemented.

        The vera has the tendency to miss a lot of zwave traffic due to its very bizarre "maintenance" scheme whereby it sends request to every battery devices to do a network heal whenever they wakeup (wakeup NNU) which basically disables the device and the network nodes around it while it is polling them for about a minute. And the nightly heal which essentially does the same for all devices no matter how they are powered, freezing the entire network for 30min (depending on how large your network is) at least and causing luup engine hangs and crashes as the unfinished tasks accumulate. All very unique "features" of the vera. There was another thing about the battery operated devices which I had requested for the longest time to eliminate but it escapes me at the moment.

        Combine this with a weak antenna and a noisy RF environment and you get a lot of "Can't detect device"

        cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • rafale77R rafale77

          @cw-kid said in Vera device extended attributes ?:

          Its a fudge fix for Vera being crap at handling these motion sensors, seems a later firmware update at some point in time made this happen, as it never happened in the past and those sensors never use to say "Can't Detect Device".

          The vera will flag battery operated devices it fails to receive a wakeup signal for a time >2x the wakeup interval. It is a common behavior in controllers and I don't think it is new. You should see complains about this from the beginning of vera. I thought I had suggested to vera dev to change this behavior to run this flag so as not to only consider the wakeup packets but all packets as the "last alive" time to eliminate exclusive dependency on the wakeup process. I guess I was ignored. If I remember correctly made the same suggestion to z-wave.me and it got quickly implemented.

          The vera has the tendency to miss a lot of zwave traffic due to its very bizarre "maintenance" scheme whereby it sends request to every battery devices to do a network heal whenever they wakeup (wakeup NNU) which basically disables the device and the network nodes around it while it is polling them for about a minute. And the nightly heal which essentially does the same for all devices no matter how they are powered, freezing the entire network for 30min (depending on how large your network is) at least and causing luup engine hangs and crashes as the unfinished tasks accumulate. All very unique "features" of the vera. There was another thing about the battery operated devices which I had requested for the longest time to eliminate but it escapes me at the moment.

          Combine this with a weak antenna and a noisy RF environment and you get a lot of "Can't detect device"

          cw-kidC Offline
          cw-kidC Offline
          cw-kid
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          @rafale77 Yes I'm sure they could of improved many things.

          I only get "Can't detect device" on mainly two motion sensor devices and its always the same two.

          I have other motion sensor devices that don't seem to have this issue or certain not all the time like these two do.

          I have polling set to 0 for all battery operated devices and their wakeup interval is 86400 / 24 hrs.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • rafale77R Offline
            rafale77R Offline
            rafale77
            wrote on last edited by rafale77
            #6

            Try also update the LastWakeupTime to be the same as LastTrip and reset the sensor failure with the setFailure command in luup code for that device or maybe even waking them up manually. I think these devices may not be waking up at all or may just happen to be waking up when your zwave network is doing something else like a heal or an nnu so it is missing them every time.

            cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • rafale77R rafale77

              Try also update the LastWakeupTime to be the same as LastTrip and reset the sensor failure with the setFailure command in luup code for that device or maybe even waking them up manually. I think these devices may not be waking up at all or may just happen to be waking up when your zwave network is doing something else like a heal or an nnu so it is missing them every time.

              cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kid
              wrote on last edited by cw-kid
              #7

              @rafale77 Looking at one of the motion sensors that has "Can't detect device" on it now, its lastwakeup time is: 1606495613 or Friday, 27 November 2020 16:46:53

              Its an Everspring SP816-1 outdoor one. Looking in its user manual it does say its maximum wakeup interval is 1 day, so I should be OK with 86400 seconds I have it set as.

              Wonder why its not waking up? It's still detecting motion events perfectly fine. Might have to take it down and check the batteries and wake it up manually.

              5caa267c-6322-4ba3-8067-ea80c5035de8-image.png

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kid
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                The other problem motion sensor is a Neo Cool Cam NAS-PD02Z. I can't even see a "LastWakeup" variable / value on that device at all, it has no field for it in the GUI showing.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • rafale77R Offline
                  rafale77R Offline
                  rafale77
                  wrote on last edited by rafale77
                  #9

                  Yep that's the problem. The vera tags its battery operated devices as "can't detect" using this variable. For your information:
                  WakeupInterval is a parameter of the vera. It is the interval the vera is going to measure to as it expects the device to update.
                  ConfiguredWakeupInterval is a parameter stored in the device. It is the number the vera got the last time the device was configured and told the vera that's the setting it has.
                  LastWakeup is the date the last time the vera saw the device to have woken up.

                  The logic in the vera is as I said before, "if os.time() - LastWakeup > WakeupInterval*2 then set Device fail =1".... 😉
                  Now more funny... The device wakes up to its lifeline associated group. (group 1). It is possible that your device was not completely configured and that the association was not setup correctly. The best way to know is to wake the device up to see if you see the variable. If not then try reconfiguring.
                  More fun... some devices won't accept any other nodeID than "1" in this association group so if your vera's zwave has a different ID... well it will never report to the vera that it has woken up.

                  cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • rafale77R rafale77

                    Yep that's the problem. The vera tags its battery operated devices as "can't detect" using this variable. For your information:
                    WakeupInterval is a parameter of the vera. It is the interval the vera is going to measure to as it expects the device to update.
                    ConfiguredWakeupInterval is a parameter stored in the device. It is the number the vera got the last time the device was configured and told the vera that's the setting it has.
                    LastWakeup is the date the last time the vera saw the device to have woken up.

                    The logic in the vera is as I said before, "if os.time() - LastWakeup > WakeupInterval*2 then set Device fail =1".... 😉
                    Now more funny... The device wakes up to its lifeline associated group. (group 1). It is possible that your device was not completely configured and that the association was not setup correctly. The best way to know is to wake the device up to see if you see the variable. If not then try reconfiguring.
                    More fun... some devices won't accept any other nodeID than "1" in this association group so if your vera's zwave has a different ID... well it will never report to the vera that it has woken up.

                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @rafale77 said in Vera device extended attributes ?:

                    WakeupInterval is a parameter of the vera. It is the interval the vera is going to measure to as it expects the device to update.
                    ConfiguredWakeupInterval is a parameter stored in the device

                    ConfiguredWakeupInterval on both of these motion sensor is
                    86400 I can see this value on each device.

                    The WakeupInterval on both of these motion sensor is
                    86400 I can see this value on each device.

                    I've just woken up the Neo Cool Cam one that had the missing LastWakeUp value and its still missing. I then polled it OK but still no LastWakeUp field showing up. Might have to try and reconfigure it.

                    As for the Everspring one outside, Vera says it hasn't woken up since November LOL. I'll have to take it down and have a look also.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • rafale77R Offline
                      rafale77R Offline
                      rafale77
                      wrote on last edited by rafale77
                      #11

                      Idea popping in my head to make this behave more like z-way... have a scene to update the LastWakeup variable every time the Tripped variable changes... That would be a quick patch to overcome the stupidity of the firmware.

                      cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • rafale77R rafale77

                        Idea popping in my head to make this behave more like z-way... have a scene to update the LastWakeup variable every time the Tripped variable changes... That would be a quick patch to overcome the stupidity of the firmware.

                        cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kid
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        @rafale77 Sounds like a good idea.

                        If I could have a MSR rule do this? even better.

                        rafale77R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cw-kidC cw-kid

                          @rafale77 Sounds like a good idea.

                          If I could have a MSR rule do this? even better.

                          rafale77R Offline
                          rafale77R Offline
                          rafale77
                          wrote on last edited by rafale77
                          #13

                          @cw-kid

                          It's possible to do it on the MSR but this is the version on the vera:

                          1. Create a scene with trigger being your sensor's tripped event (tripped or untripped)
                          2. Add the following lua code as the scene lua:
                          local dev = --the device id of the sensor--
                          local t = os.time()
                          luup.variable_set("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZWaveDevice1", "LastWakeup", t, dev)
                          if luup.variable_get("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1", "CommFailure", dev)=="1" then
                            luup.set_failure(false,dev)
                          end
                          

                          Done...

                          You could possibly even implement this to all sensors by making it a function and set a variable watch on all the tripped values in the startup lua... After this, you would also have to run

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • cw-kidC Offline
                            cw-kidC Offline
                            cw-kid
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            Great thank you. I will give it a try.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cw-kidC Offline
                              cw-kidC Offline
                              cw-kid
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Just tried the code in the Vera test window against the outdoor Everspring motion sensor. It works. Its updated its lastwakeup value to just now and gotten rid of the "Can'r detect device" red banner also.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cw-kidC Offline
                                cw-kidC Offline
                                cw-kid
                                wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                                #16

                                I ran the code against the other Neo Cool Cam motion sensor with the missing LastWakeUp field and now that field is present and up to date with that time stamp.

                                I've setup two functions in the Vera startup for each motion sensor to run this LUA code and two MSR rules to trigger upon their motion being tripped etc.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kid
                                  wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                                  #17

                                  But the "Can't Detect Device" error comes back again shortly after the motion sensor has been untripped for a while.

                                  5592b768-9242-480f-a18a-be843dcf51f1-image.png

                                  Damn you Vera firmware haha.

                                  As soon as its tripped it goes away, with what we have setup

                                  c23296a1-50eb-4aa1-8ab5-822da12bb0d7-image.png

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • rafale77R Offline
                                    rafale77R Offline
                                    rafale77
                                    wrote on last edited by rafale77
                                    #18

                                    Note that if you don't trip these sensors regularly, you will still see a problem eventually so it is best to fix the wakeup. If they get tripped regularly then you don't need to worry too much about it.

                                    On your last edit: Please ensure to use the code I updated. I made a mistake the first time around using the wrong service ID.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cw-kidC Offline
                                      cw-kidC Offline
                                      cw-kid
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      This is what I have in the functions:

                                      -- Porch Motion Sensor Fix LastWakeUp and Can't Detect Device Errors
                                      function PorchMotionSensorFix() 
                                         luup.log('VeraScenes.PorchMotionSensorFix')
                                         local dev = 304
                                         local t = os.time()
                                         luup.variable_set("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZWaveDevice1", "LastWakeup", t, dev)
                                         if luup.variable_get("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1", "CommFailure", dev)=="1" then
                                         luup.set_failure(false,dev)
                                         end
                                      end
                                      
                                      -- Lounge Motion Sensor Fix LastWakeUp and Can't Detect Device Errors
                                      function LoungeMotionSensorFix()
                                         luup.log('VeraScenes.LoungeMotionSensorFix')
                                         local dev = 331
                                         local t = os.time()
                                         luup.variable_set("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZWaveDevice1", "LastWakeup", t, dev)
                                         if luup.variable_get("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1", "CommFailure", dev)=="1" then
                                         luup.set_failure(false,dev)
                                         end
                                      end
                                      
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • rafale77R Offline
                                        rafale77R Offline
                                        rafale77
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        Yup it should work. I don't see why it would flag them as failed again... The firmware checks every 10min so you have to wait 10min to be sure it doesn't come back.

                                        cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • rafale77R rafale77

                                          Yup it should work. I don't see why it would flag them as failed again... The firmware checks every 10min so you have to wait 10min to be sure it doesn't come back.

                                          cw-kidC Offline
                                          cw-kidC Offline
                                          cw-kid
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @rafale77 I'll take a closer watch over it and see, it may have been 10 minutes.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Error: Command timeout
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            6
                                            93

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            131
                                            74.5k

                                          • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            5
                                            179

                                          • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            6
                                            210

                                          • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            1
                                            1
                                            72

                                          • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                                            M
                                            mgvra
                                            1
                                            3
                                            168

                                          • Script action and custom timers
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            183

                                          • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            12
                                            485

                                          • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            1
                                            2
                                            146

                                          • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            6
                                            220

                                          • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            17
                                            618

                                          • Shelly Wall Display XL
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            2
                                            9
                                            905
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved