Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Setting up Pushover in MSR
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Setting up Pushover in MSR

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
8 Posts 3 Posters 1.7k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jsimmo
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi,

    I've been using Pushover in VeraAlerts, but now want to send my notifications from MSR.
    I see in the reactor config directory that the notification. yaml file includes Pushover, but is showing #TBD. Is this where I need to set up my Pushover user key etc. and if so what and how should the information be entered?

    Any help would be appreciated.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Look in /dist-config/notifications.yaml for the latest guide on configuring for Pushover

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        jsimmo
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thanks. Should have known to look there. Will give it a try.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          jsimmo
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Followed the guide and Pushover is now set up and working fine.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • LibraSunL Offline
            LibraSunL Offline
            LibraSun
            wrote on last edited by LibraSun
            #5

            I've got my Pushover config up and running (and dare I say, working great) in MSR, except for one minor "thing"...

            ...all my notifications keep coming to the default device (my cellphone) rather than the device explicitly declared in the "Device:" field of my Rule. I've double-checked the spelling (HP_mini, which matches the label assigned to my Web browser on pushover.net), verified that the Pushover client is open in Chrome and receiving messages -- particularly those I send from the Pushover web UI "as MSR", and that all keys are current and in the right places, etc.

            Like I say, the messages DO get sent. Only to the wrong endpoint. Is anyone else with multiple endpoints defined getting misdirected notices from MSR??

            • Libra "Edge Case" Sun

            P.S. I don't reckon these associated lines from Reactor.log shed any light on the URL sent (and MSR cannot capture Pushover's response, so far as I know):

            2021-04-22T22:11:10.717Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:750> Rule#rule-kntf80qj dependency notification entity-changed Entity#vera>device_110 from Entity#vera>device_110
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.718Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:756> Rule#rule-kntf80qj requesting eval; entity-changed Entity#vera>device_110
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.719Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:750> Rule#rule-kntf80qj dependency notification entity-changed Entity#vera>device_110 from Entity#vera>device_110
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.720Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:756> Rule#rule-kntf80qj requesting eval; entity-changed Entity#vera>device_110
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.721Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:951> Rule#rule-kntf80qj (rule-kntf80qj) evaluate() acquiring mutex
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.722Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:951> Rule#rule-kntf80qj (rule-kntf80qj) evaluate() acquiring mutex
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.723Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:955> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() mutex acquired, evaluating
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.724Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:959> Rule#rule-kntf80qj update rate is 3/min limit 60/min
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.725Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:881> Rule#rule-kntf80qj evaluateExpressions() with 0 expressions
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.725Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:971> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.726Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:973> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() constraints state true
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.727Z <Rule:null> Rule#rule-kntf80qj rule state now false, changed no
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.728Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:955> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() mutex acquired, evaluating
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.729Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:959> Rule#rule-kntf80qj update rate is 3/min limit 60/min
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.730Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:881> Rule#rule-kntf80qj evaluateExpressions() with 0 expressions
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.731Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:971> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.732Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:973> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() constraints state true
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.733Z <Rule:null> Rule#rule-kntf80qj rule state now false, changed no
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.850Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:750> Rule#rule-kntf80qj dependency notification entity-changed Entity#vera>device_110 from Entity#vera>device_110
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.851Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:756> Rule#rule-kntf80qj requesting eval; entity-changed Entity#vera>device_110
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.852Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:750> Rule#rule-kntf80qj dependency notification entity-changed Entity#vera>device_110 from Entity#vera>device_110
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.853Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:756> Rule#rule-kntf80qj requesting eval; entity-changed Entity#vera>device_110
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.854Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:951> Rule#rule-kntf80qj (rule-kntf80qj) evaluate() acquiring mutex
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.855Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:951> Rule#rule-kntf80qj (rule-kntf80qj) evaluate() acquiring mutex
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.856Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:955> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() mutex acquired, evaluating
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.856Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:959> Rule#rule-kntf80qj update rate is 4/min limit 60/min
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.857Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:881> Rule#rule-kntf80qj evaluateExpressions() with 0 expressions
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.859Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1579> cond cond7hpkrvd evaluation state false->true
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.860Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1579> cond trig evaluation state false->true
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.860Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:971> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() trigger state now true (was false)
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.861Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:973> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() constraints state true
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.862Z <Rule:INFO> Rule#rule-kntf80qj (rule-kntf80qj) triggered!
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.863Z <Rule:null> Rule#rule-kntf80qj rule state changed, was false now true
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.863Z <Rule:null> Rule#rule-kntf80qj rule state now true, changed true
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.865Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:955> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() mutex acquired, evaluating
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.866Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:959> Rule#rule-kntf80qj update rate is 4/min limit 60/min
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.867Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:881> Rule#rule-kntf80qj evaluateExpressions() with 0 expressions
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.868Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:971> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() trigger state now true (was false)
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.869Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:973> Rule#rule-kntf80qj._evaluate() constraints state true
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.869Z <Rule:INFO> Rule#rule-kntf80qj (rule-kntf80qj) triggered!
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.870Z <Rule:null> Rule#rule-kntf80qj rule state now true, changed no
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.872Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:999> Rule#rule-kntf80qj enqueueing reaction rule-kntf80qj:S
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.873Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "rule-kntf80qj<SET>" (rule-kntf80qj:S)
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.874Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:948> Engine#1 queueReaction() starting Promise for rule-kntf80qj:S rule rule-kntf80qj task 368
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.875Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1059> _process_reaction_queue() wake-up!
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.877Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1020> _process_reaction_queue() running task 368 { "tid": 368, "id": "rule-kntf80qj:S", "rule": "rule-kntf80qj", "__reaction": [RuleReaction#rule-kntf80qj:S], "next_step": 0, "status": 0, "ts": 1619129470873, "__resolve": --function--, "__reject": --function--, "__promise": [object Promise] }
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.878Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction rule-kntf80qj<SET> [RuleReaction#rule-kntf80qj:S]
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.879Z <Engine:5:NotifyPushover.js:208> NotifyPushover sending profile default notification request: Test
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.882Z <Engine:INFO> rule-kntf80qj<SET> all actions completed.
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.883Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1024> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status -1; task 368
            2021-04-22T22:11:10.885Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1059> _process_reaction_queue ending with 0 in queue; none delayed/ready; waiting
            2021-04-22T22:11:11.288Z <Engine:5:NotifyPushover.js:216> NotifyPushover successful endpoint exchange (message sent)
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.936Z <Rule:NOTICE> Rule#rule-kntf80qj configuration changed; reloading
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.937Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:715> Rule#rule-kntf80qj reloading with new data
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.937Z <Rule:NOTICE> Rule#rule-kntf80qj stopping rule
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.938Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:696> Rule#rule-kntf80qj acquiring semaphore
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.938Z <Rule:NOTICE> Rule#rule-kntf80qj configuration changed; reloading
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.939Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:715> Rule#rule-kntf80qj reloading with new data
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.940Z <Rule:NOTICE> Rule#rule-kntf80qj stopping rule
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.940Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:696> Rule#rule-kntf80qj acquiring semaphore
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.941Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:699> Rule#rule-kntf80qj semaphore acquired; releasing timer
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.942Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:699> Rule#rule-kntf80qj semaphore acquired; unsubscribing from condition dependencies
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.943Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:701> Rule#rule-kntf80qj saving states
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.944Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:705> Rule#rule-kntf80qj stopped
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.944Z <Rule:NOTICE> Rule Rule#rule-kntf80qj stopped
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.945Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:699> Rule#rule-kntf80qj semaphore acquired; releasing timer
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.945Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:699> Rule#rule-kntf80qj semaphore acquired; unsubscribing from condition dependencies
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.946Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:701> Rule#rule-kntf80qj saving states
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.948Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:705> Rule#rule-kntf80qj stopped
            2021-04-22T22:11:14.948Z <Rule:NOTICE> Rule Rule#rule-kntf80qj stopped
            
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • LibraSunL Offline
              LibraSunL Offline
              LibraSun
              wrote on last edited by
              #6
              This post is deleted!
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Confirmed bug on the device in the Pushover notification. Open a PR!

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • LibraSunL Offline
                  LibraSunL Offline
                  LibraSun
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Fixed! Pushover sends just fine now to any designated endpoint.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  Recent Topics

                  • Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
                    N
                    noelab
                    0
                    8
                    78

                  • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    1
                    9
                    253

                  • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    5
                    149
                    135.8k

                  • Unofficial thread for compatibility
                    tunnusT
                    tunnus
                    2
                    2
                    715

                  • Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    0
                    2
                    65

                  • Bail out of failed reaction?
                    T
                    tamorgen
                    0
                    3
                    110

                  • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                    T
                    tamorgen
                    0
                    7
                    335

                  • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                    CrilleC
                    Crille
                    0
                    5
                    243

                  • Upgrade Issues
                    T
                    tbully
                    0
                    9
                    358

                  • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    0
                    10
                    474

                  • [SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
                    G
                    gwp1
                    0
                    5
                    235

                  • openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
                    A
                    a-lurker
                    0
                    2
                    253
                  Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                  Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Unsolved