Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Entities - where used and what triggered it
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Help with scene controller cycling logic
therealdbT
I’ve added a couple of Shelly Wave i4 as scene controllers and I’m planning to add more, since I can just use standard buttons instead of battery-powered scene controllers, which also looks better aesthetically. That said, I’m struggling to figure out how to write a simple rule that cycles between states every time I press a button. Example: Light 1 ON → OFF, then Light 2 ON → OFF. The part I can’t get right is handling the case where Light 1 or Light 2 might already be ON independently of the rule. Maybe it’s just too much sun and relaxation clouding my brain, but any hint would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
wmarcolinW
Use case: When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled. To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work. Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch. In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR. Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR. If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR. Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
Multi-System Reactor

Entities - where used and what triggered it

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
5 Posts 3 Posters 675 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • PerHP Offline
    PerHP Offline
    PerH
    wrote on last edited by PerH
    #1

    Haven't payed attention to the development for a while (and it seems to be progressing fast), is there a way to see where an entity is used, and what action used it recently?

    If not, it would be nice to have when things happen when they shouldn't, wether its because of bugs or bad logic. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      At the moment, if you turn the logging level for the "Rule" class (see more below) to 5 or higher (but 5 is enough), rules will log dependency notifications (entities or other data changing that cause them to re-evaluate). Looks like this (scroll to see the first line, in particular):

      2021-03-29T12:04:39.753Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:448> Rule#rule-grpy8wi802 requesting eval; entity-changed Entity#house>device_376
      2021-03-29T12:04:39.753Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:768> Rule#rule-grpy8wi802 (Dehumidifier Off) evaluate() acquiring mutex
      2021-03-29T12:04:39.753Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:774> Rule#rule-grpy8wi802._evaluate() mutex acquired, evaluating
      2021-03-29T12:04:39.753Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:782> Rule#rule-grpy8wi802 update rate is 3/min limit 60/min
      2021-03-29T12:04:39.753Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:627> Rule#rule-grpy8wi802 evaluateExpressions() with 0 expressions
      2021-03-29T12:04:39.753Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:810> Rule#rule-grpy8wi802._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
      

      In all likelihood, the logging of a changing entity starting a rule evaluation is going to get promoted to "info" level (4) and be a visible message in a default configuration (without changing log levels). But, as I'm working in the background on status tab info and trouble alerts, I'm experimenting with a more comprehensive way of reporting this on the UI. But this is what it is for now.

      For reactions, at the moment all actions against entities are logged unconditionally. That looks like this (notice the Engine:null entry and the line from VeraController that follows):

      2021-03-30T12:01:18.245Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Pump Run Conditions<RESET>" (rule-grpjx0sdf8:R)
      2021-03-30T12:01:18.245Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Pump Run Conditions<RESET> [RuleReaction#rule-grpjx0sdf8:R]
      2021-03-30T12:01:18.245Z <Engine:null> _resume_reaction() entity house>device_373 (Recirc Pump Switch) perform power_switch.off({  }
      )
      2021-03-30T12:01:18.246Z <VeraController:null> VeraController#house enqueue task for Entity#house>device_373 action power_switch.off
      : task { "newTargetValue": "0", "DeviceNum": 373, "id": "action", "serviceId": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchPower1", "action": "Set
      Target" }
      2021-03-30T12:01:18.426Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction Pump Run Conditions<RESET> from step 1
      2021-03-30T12:01:18.426Z <Engine:INFO> Pump Run Conditions<RESET> all actions completed.
      

      This does not require a change in the logging level for the Engine class (that runs reactions) right now. In future, it will also get a level 5 requirement, but, there already exists a monitored_entities in which you can place an array of (canonical) entity IDs for which the system will log all actions performed regardless of source (so by rule reaction, global reaction, or user action from the UI).

      reactor:
        baseurl: ... your other top-level configuration stuff
        engine:    # this line indented two spaces
          monitored_entities:
            - hass>light_test_dimmer_73
            - vera>device_10
            - hubitat>1
            - vera>device_254
      

      Changing Log Levels

      Logging is controlled by configuration in logging.yaml. Every object in the system can be logged either through its parent class or by individual object, so you can set a logging level for all rules, or for just one particular rule you are interested in. The structure of the file should be clear from the example in dist-config/logging.yaml.

      1. Rule #1: do not under any circumstances change the "default" logging level at the top of logging.yaml.
      2. Class- or object-based logging level can be changed by either modifying the level below the listed class or object, if it's already in the file. If it's not, add a class by indenting the class name with two space and following with a colon, and then on the following line add level: indented four spaces and your level (see example below). To add a specific object, such as a single rule, use the ID found in the UI status display and add it. And example of each is shown below:
        Rule:                     # this line is indented TWO spaces
          level: 5               # this line is indented FOUR spaces
        Rule#rule-kvjw8634:
          level: 6
      

      You can later return the log level to the default (4) or remove the entry entirely. If you set log levels high, remember to set them back down after troubleshooting or you'll be logging a lot of unnecessary data.

      More info on Logging here: https://reactor.toggledbits.com/docs/Logging/

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • PerHP Offline
        PerHP Offline
        PerH
        wrote on last edited by PerH
        #3

        Ok, that will work. Thanks.

        Would be good to have a "quick look" somewhere in the UI though, specifically where reactor performs an action, not for all evaluations or change notifications.
        The usual scenario is that some light is turned off when it shouldn't, and i need to know what turned it off. (may not have been reactor at all)
        I.e a list of the 5 latest actions done on the entity at the bottom of the entity status list? with date/time and rule/reaction name?

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Yup, coming. For now, check the logs.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 3 Offline
            3 Offline
            3rdStng
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I could use this "Where Used" feature as well. I have 3 Global Expressions that I don't think I have using, but want to make sure before I nuke them. I did not change my logging levels, but did search through all the reactor.log files and do not see anything. Is there a different way to see if they are in use, other than killing them and seeing what breaks?

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
            • T tbully referenced this topic on
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            Recent Topics

            • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
              M
              mgvra
              1
              3
              48

            • Script action and custom timers
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              4
              74

            • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
              CatmanV2C
              CatmanV2
              0
              12
              217

            • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
              CatmanV2C
              CatmanV2
              5
              128
              72.8k

            • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
              akbooerA
              akbooer
              1
              2
              76

            • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
              CrilleC
              Crille
              0
              6
              83

            • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              17
              291

            • Shelly Wall Display XL
              akbooerA
              akbooer
              2
              9
              683

            • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              26
              495

            • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
              CrilleC
              Crille
              0
              12
              364

            • No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              2
              86

            • Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              2
              122
            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
            Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Unsolved