Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Device information in string or array
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Device information in string or array

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
18 Posts 4 Posters 2.3k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wmarcolinW Offline
    wmarcolinW Offline
    wmarcolin
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    One extra query, is it possible to put in an array a search that lists all the device names that meet a characteristic, for example category_num 4 and subcategory_num 1? An array that returns ["vera>device_1", "vera>device_2", "vera>device_3"].

    In other words, I would like to fill in my above example, the variable OpenDoorWindList more automatically, without having to manually prepare this list.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Yes, that's what I am referring to as planned but not yet implemented in my earlier reply.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • wmarcolinW Offline
        wmarcolinW Offline
        wmarcolin
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Ah, ok, thanks!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          HansW
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #11

          Well, I have been trying to use the above example to get a message reporting LAN connectivity failure of devices in my network.

          So I have set up an array with devices the Global expressions named DeviceTrackerList:

          ['hass>device_tracker_airport_time_capsule_van_hw','hass>device_tracker_airport_time_capsule_van_hw','hass>device_tracker_akita','hass>device_tracker_altherma_lan_adapter','hass>device_tracker_ap_bijkeuken' etc] 
          

          Then I run into problems defining the loop into a variable DeviceTrackerNotHome:

          each id in DeviceTrackerList:getEntity( id).state == not_home ? id: null
          

          Which returns the entire list. I have tried a few dozen of other options but either the entire list or an empty list is returned. Obviously my .state does not do the trick but what is the correct syntax to use here? (And where could I have found that myself?...)

          Then the next step is to use the names of the failing devices in a message.

          My last global variable is named DeviceTrackerMessage and holds

          join(each id in DeviceTrackerNotHome:getEntity(id).name, ', ')
          

          which returns a nice list of friendly names but I have no idea how to use that in my message.

          I expected { "message": {DeviceTrackerMessage} } to work but it did not and all other attempts to construct something failed as well.

          So I do hope someone can help here to point out to me what is probably obvious but difficult for a novice user to see. 🙂

          toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H HansW

            Well, I have been trying to use the above example to get a message reporting LAN connectivity failure of devices in my network.

            So I have set up an array with devices the Global expressions named DeviceTrackerList:

            ['hass>device_tracker_airport_time_capsule_van_hw','hass>device_tracker_airport_time_capsule_van_hw','hass>device_tracker_akita','hass>device_tracker_altherma_lan_adapter','hass>device_tracker_ap_bijkeuken' etc] 
            

            Then I run into problems defining the loop into a variable DeviceTrackerNotHome:

            each id in DeviceTrackerList:getEntity( id).state == not_home ? id: null
            

            Which returns the entire list. I have tried a few dozen of other options but either the entire list or an empty list is returned. Obviously my .state does not do the trick but what is the correct syntax to use here? (And where could I have found that myself?...)

            Then the next step is to use the names of the failing devices in a message.

            My last global variable is named DeviceTrackerMessage and holds

            join(each id in DeviceTrackerNotHome:getEntity(id).name, ', ')
            

            which returns a nice list of friendly names but I have no idea how to use that in my message.

            I expected { "message": {DeviceTrackerMessage} } to work but it did not and all other attempts to construct something failed as well.

            So I do hope someone can help here to point out to me what is probably obvious but difficult for a novice user to see. 🙂

            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #12

            @hansw said in Device information in string or array:

            each id in DeviceTrackerList:getEntity( id).state == not_home ? id: null

            The state part isn't right... everything from getEntity() to the question mark, in fact. Go to the Entities list, find one of the entities you have listed in DeviceTrackerList, and click on it to open its detail pane. You'll see the correct names of all the attributes listed there. Two things need to be fixed: (a) where you have getEntity( id ).state in the above example, you need to replace it with getEntity( id ).attributes.capabilityname.attributename (e.g. .attributes.x_hass.state or .attributes.x_hass_device_tracker.location_name); and (2) where you have not_home, there is probably no variable by that name, and I'm betting you actually meant to compare to a string here, so that needs to be surrounded in quotes: ... == "not_home"

            @hansw said in Device information in string or array:

            which returns a nice list of friendly names but I have no idea how to use that in my message.
            I expected { "message": {DeviceTrackerMessage} } to work

            The message would be something like:

            ${{ "Trackers not home: " + DeviceTrackerMessage }}
            

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              HansW
              wrote on last edited by HansW
              #13

              Thanks again for your help @toggledbits. I had been looking at the wrong place (in HASS) for the entities but your pointer was a great help also for other uses of reactor. The expressions are working like a charm now.

              Still having trouble getting the JSON correct using the Variable though. I am using the x_hass_system.call_service and whatever I try it fails.

              The string looks like:
              { "title": "The following devices fail: ", "message": XXXX } Where at the location of the XXXX I probably need a trick to insert the DeviceTrackerMessage with surrounding double quotes but I don't have a clue.

              I even tried building the JSON into a global variable but it looks like the escape characters do not work or maybe I overlook something obvious.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                #14

                Show me all of the variables involved, and your rule and it's reactions. We'll work from the point you've arrived at.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Offline
                  H Offline
                  HansW
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  Thanks @toggledbits , the variables I showed you in my earlier post and I corrected them zo they evaluate properly now into a string DeviceTrackerMessage which holds the friendly name of the devices offline, separated with comma's. As a string it does not have "" around it.

                  My rule has a lot of Entity Attribute checks of all devices checked on x_hass.state <> home and combined into an OR.

                  Then as a constraint I check the Variable Value DeviceTrackerMessage <> ""

                  And then the Set Reaction holds:

                  Entity Action hass>system x_hass_system.call_service with service: notify.my_device and the data: holding
                  { "title": "Some devices failed: ", "message": XXXXX }

                  Where on the position of XXXX I tried all I could think of.

                  I know the rule might not be perfect yet but just testing the Set Reaction should generate a message. When replacing the XXXX with "test" I get a message.

                  Also I tried adding a variable called JSONString and populating that using to JSON but I cannot get the result to look like a JSON string nor to work.

                  Hope this helps.....

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #16

                    The data field requires either a string that can be parsed as JSON data, or (works but not documented), you can pass an object from an expression. Both of these will require that you use a substitution to get the object or string into the field.

                    My suggestion is that you minimize the need to understand quoting, etc. by creating another variable to house the data object, and pass that variable in the Entity action. Two steps:

                    1. Create an expression (could be local or global) called notify_data defined as follows:

                       { "title": "Some devices failed", "message": DeviceTrackerMessage }
                      
                    2. To insert that into your Entity Action, set the data field to ${{ notify_data }}

                    That's what I would consider to be the "easy" way, which is a little longer than the most direct route, but easier (I think) to understand (and support/remember in future). The first step creates an object with two keys and sets their values: the title is a string, and the message is the value of DeviceTrackerMessage (no quotes around that name means it's a variable reference). The second step passes the object to the data field.

                    The other way would simply be to set the data field in your action to the JSON string directly in one step. There are several ways to do this, and one of them is to use a similar approach to what we've done above, and just have the stringify() function convert it to JSON for us (that's what it does). Set the data field in your Entity Action to:

                    ${{ stringify( { "title": "Some devices failed", "message": DeviceTrackerMessage } ) }}
                    

                    You should be able to see the similarity here. The interior object definition creates an object with two keys, title and message, and their particular values. That is passed to stringify(), which converts it to JSON, and that result string becomes the value of the field passed to Hass on the service call.

                    You can also do this without stringify(), but it's more complicated. We have to build the JSON string ourselves and insert the data from DeviceTrackerMessage into it using string concatenation, with careful use of different quotes for different purposes (the tricky part):

                    ${{ '{ "title": "Some devices failed", "message": "' + DeviceTrackerMessage + '" }' }}
                    

                    Notice that before and after + DeviceTrackerMessage + we have double quotes inside single quotes (hard to see, especially at the end). But this would also work, provided DeviceTrackerMessage does not contain any double quotes itself. Quoting can be hard to get right, especially for new players, so I generally try to find solutions that avoid it, which is why I put the other two solutions first on my list.

                    Edit: heh... actually, an even shorter version of my first alternative is to not use stringify() at all and just create and pass the object on the fly... set data field to this:

                    ${{ { "title": "Some devices failed", "message": DeviceTrackerMessage } }}
                    

                    That's about as direct as it gets -- you're creating and passing the data object in one step, there is no need to convert it to a JSON string because you can pass the object directly. For clarity, no additional variable needs to be created, either. I think I like this best.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H Offline
                      H Offline
                      HansW
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      Thanks a lot for your elaborate answer and explanation @toggledbits! I do appreciate this and it helps me further, also with other issues, to make better use of your wonderful tool! I was not aware of this ${{ }} construction and I have no idea from which language this syntax is but I guess it forces the bit in between to be evaluated.

                      Anyway, it solved the problem! Thanks a lot!!

                      toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • H HansW

                        Thanks a lot for your elaborate answer and explanation @toggledbits! I do appreciate this and it helps me further, also with other issues, to make better use of your wonderful tool! I was not aware of this ${{ }} construction and I have no idea from which language this syntax is but I guess it forces the bit in between to be evaluated.

                        Anyway, it solved the problem! Thanks a lot!!

                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                        #18

                        @hansw said in Device information in string or array:

                        I was not aware of this ${{ }} construction and I have no idea from which language this syntax is but I guess it forces the bit in between to be evaluated.

                        That is exactly what it does, and the value that results become the value of that field for the action. Similar syntax is used in many applications (it's not really a language feature as much as it is an application feature), among them Home Assistant. Reactor for Vera used plain { } but this was problematic because the more robust expression language of MSR uses those characters.

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Recent Topics

                        • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          2
                          43

                        • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                          S
                          SweetGenius
                          1
                          1
                          34

                        • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          2
                          1
                          29

                        • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          1
                          63

                        • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          4
                          89

                        • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                          therealdbT
                          therealdb
                          0
                          3
                          103

                        • Possible feature request 2?
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          3
                          78

                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          5
                          133
                          80.1k

                        • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          1
                          9
                          390

                        • Copying a global reaction
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          3
                          117

                        • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          9
                          452

                        • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          4
                          173
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Unsolved