Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Change instruction in Dome DMS01 device
Self test
CatmanV2C
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something? Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Change instruction in Dome DMS01 device

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
8 Posts 2 Posters 1.0k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wmarcolinW Offline
    wmarcolinW Offline
    wmarcolin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi,

    I do not know the community can help but here is the request 😁.

    I have a Dome DMS01 device to have sound alerts. To operate it has an APP installed, Dome Chime that calls one of 10 types of sounds by a panel.

    9ae09d5f-f41c-4515-bd2f-81c2cb72b646-image.png

    d5dff783-16f1-4ed5-888d-11c0ff5d204d-image.png

    To use it with Reactor, I had to create a scene for each sound, which Reactor calls and triggers the sound/chime. I would like to check if there is a way to make this call directly from MSR, without going through this ugly scene path.

    I already changed the configuration variable, but it only changes what is stored in the Vera, it doesn't change the data in the device, so it doesn't change the bell.

    024a8634-c43f-461e-9a86-d5c1df56c8b2-image.png

    When using the reconfiguration instruction (x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1. Reconfigure), it shows an error message and does not make the change.

    d58bb0e3-eaea-4600-86d3-d3a93bbde385-image.png

    Manual info: http://manuals-backend.z-wave.info/make.php?lang=en&sku=DMS01&cert=ZC10-17015372

    In short, I want to do in the MSR the same thing that this APP does.

    If anyone can help, I appreciate.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      OK. So first, you're not telling us how your Vera scene works, so I can't be more detailed in the reply here, but...

      Changing VariablesSet does nothing on the device immediately.

      The usual way to change configuration parameters on the fly (on both Vera and in MSR) is to use a direct ZWave send data with the necessary byte string for setting configuration parameters. This goes immediately to the device, as opposed to modifying the state variable (directly or via the UI) which won't do anything until the device is next configured.

      In MSR, use the zwave_network.send_data action on Vera device #1, which is on the ZWave network parent device for all ZWave devices on Vera (search your MSR entities for the entity with ID device_1). You need to know the ZWave node number (not device number) of the Dome Chime, and the a configuration parameter format (again, no info about how you did it in your scene, so I can't be more detailed here). The general form of the data to be sent for setting a configuration variable is: x70 4 n s b... where the x70 is the Zwave configuration command class, 4 is the set command, n is the parameter number (0-255), s is the number of bytes in the value (1, 2 or 4), and b... is one, two or four byte values separated by a space (just like the rest of it). So, for example, to set parameter 5 to the single byte value 10, you would send x70 4 5 1 10.

      84a438bd-25c2-4d1b-8dae-30da9f883ae1-image.png

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        OK. So first, you're not telling us how your Vera scene works, so I can't be more detailed in the reply here, but...

        Changing VariablesSet does nothing on the device immediately.

        The usual way to change configuration parameters on the fly (on both Vera and in MSR) is to use a direct ZWave send data with the necessary byte string for setting configuration parameters. This goes immediately to the device, as opposed to modifying the state variable (directly or via the UI) which won't do anything until the device is next configured.

        In MSR, use the zwave_network.send_data action on Vera device #1, which is on the ZWave network parent device for all ZWave devices on Vera (search your MSR entities for the entity with ID device_1). You need to know the ZWave node number (not device number) of the Dome Chime, and the a configuration parameter format (again, no info about how you did it in your scene, so I can't be more detailed here). The general form of the data to be sent for setting a configuration variable is: x70 4 n s b... where the x70 is the Zwave configuration command class, 4 is the set command, n is the parameter number (0-255), s is the number of bytes in the value (1, 2 or 4), and b... is one, two or four byte values separated by a space (just like the rest of it). So, for example, to set parameter 5 to the single byte value 10, you would send x70 4 5 1 10.

        84a438bd-25c2-4d1b-8dae-30da9f883ae1-image.png

        wmarcolinW Offline
        wmarcolinW Offline
        wmarcolin
        wrote on last edited by wmarcolin
        #3

        @toggledbits Hola Patrick
        The scene is a pretty simple thing, I call the APP and tell it from 1 to 10 which sound I want to run.

        5347d860-4f05-453b-bd63-2f4be2cddb93-image.png

        fa59bbfa-dfa4-4a78-b294-32470e5d47e5-image.png

        Now I think my error is in one detail of your instruction "You need to know the ZWave node number (not device number) of the Dome Chime". I am using the device number, your student master doesn't know where to find the node number 😞

        9d08bb23-5e1f-4224-a29d-0daaa9b1b2af-image.png

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          The ZWave node number can be found in MSR on the Entities screen, just go to the device, click the device name to open its details, and look for zwave_device.node_id

          You may need a little delay between setting the config parameter and turning the device on, too. Commands to devices are asynchronous, so MSR isn't waiting for the command to finish on the Vera. It just sends it and moves on.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            The ZWave node number can be found in MSR on the Entities screen, just go to the device, click the device name to open its details, and look for zwave_device.node_id

            You may need a little delay between setting the config parameter and turning the device on, too. Commands to devices are asynchronous, so MSR isn't waiting for the command to finish on the Vera. It just sends it and moves on.

            wmarcolinW Offline
            wmarcolinW Offline
            wmarcolin
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits

            Well, the NodeID I know as AltID, so I used the correct number.

            0bcf2aea-d0fa-40c5-ab32-1b0a72a73b9f-image.png

            But no effect, I can't change parameter 5.

            So I decided to go back and use our good Reactor, and look at the error screen that is popping up.

            a795cc11-05d0-4726-9330-aae9aaa96c98-image.png

            According to this more technical manual we are sending the correct parameters: https://cache-m2.smarthome.com/manuals/12026-manual.pdf

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
              #6

              In your first post, you had a screen shot with a configuration error for the device. That may prevent it being configured and cause the 400 error you are seeing. You need to square the device away first using the "Device Options" in the Vera UI. Once you can get it configured without errors, then try your tests again.

              Wait... no you're using the wrong device for the Send Data. You MUST use ZWave Network device #1. Remember my instructions... find the entity with ID device_1. On Vera Reactor, you must do the same, using the device "ZWave (#1)".

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                In your first post, you had a screen shot with a configuration error for the device. That may prevent it being configured and cause the 400 error you are seeing. You need to square the device away first using the "Device Options" in the Vera UI. Once you can get it configured without errors, then try your tests again.

                Wait... no you're using the wrong device for the Send Data. You MUST use ZWave Network device #1. Remember my instructions... find the entity with ID device_1. On Vera Reactor, you must do the same, using the device "ZWave (#1)".

                wmarcolinW Offline
                wmarcolinW Offline
                wmarcolin
                wrote on last edited by wmarcolin
                #7

                @toggledbits YOU ARE A GENIUS!

                Direct command is not to the device, it is to ZWave#1

                845ff716-4f72-4da2-8d49-2714e88c0e30-image.png

                Another case closed for Super Patrick!!! Now fun for me, after 3 years I get rid of the ugly way of using the scenes to mediate the configuration of the bells.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  No special powers, no cape. Just trying to make good of all the hours spent figuring things out... I can't get that time back, but I can share what it taught me.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  Recent Topics

                  • HA and AI
                    PablaP
                    Pabla
                    0
                    2
                    62

                  • Self test
                    CatmanV2C
                    CatmanV2
                    0
                    3
                    51

                  • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                    CatmanV2C
                    CatmanV2
                    0
                    6
                    125

                  • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    0
                    2
                    100

                  • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                    S
                    SweetGenius
                    1
                    1
                    73

                  • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    3
                    1
                    67

                  • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                    G
                    gwp1
                    0
                    1
                    79

                  • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                    CrilleC
                    Crille
                    0
                    4
                    168

                  • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                    therealdbT
                    therealdb
                    0
                    3
                    152

                  • Possible feature request 2?
                    CatmanV2C
                    CatmanV2
                    0
                    3
                    133

                  • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    5
                    133
                    82.7k

                  • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                    CatmanV2C
                    CatmanV2
                    1
                    9
                    431
                  Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                  Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Unsolved