I may have posted this in the wrong section. MSR running on Bare metal Debian bullseye. Both Openluup and MSR are on the same device (an Intel NUC) at IP 192.168.70.249. Any suggestions as to where I go to resolve?
TIA
Happy new year, everyone! Hope all are well!
Looking for some pointers troubleshooting a slightly puzzling to me issue. When digging around on a different issue I noticed this happening regularly in the MSR logs:
[latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:50:07.630Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Garden lights on when the doors are open<SET> (rule-lb2h69nb:S) [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:50:07.630Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera perform action power_switch.on on Switch#vera>device_20060 with [Object]{ } [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:50:07.630Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera perform action power_switch.set on Switch#vera>device_20060 with [Object]{ "state": true } [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:50:07.670Z <VeraController:NOTICE> VeraController#vera action power_switch.set([Object]{ "state": true }) on Switch#vera>device_20060 succeeded [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:50:07.671Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Garden lights on when the doors are open<SET> (rule-lb2h69nb:S) from step 1 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:50:07.672Z <Engine:NOTICE> Garden lights on when the doors are open<SET> delaying until 1736538787672<10/01/2025, 19:53:07> [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:50:19.595Z <Rule:INFO> Garden lights on when the doors are open (rule-lb2h69nb in Outside Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET! [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:52:16.506Z <Rule:INFO> Garden lights on when the doors are open (rule-lb2h69nb in Outside Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET! [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:52:16.515Z <Engine:INFO> [Engine]Engine#1 not enqueueing rule-lb2h69nb:S: already in queue with status 2 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:52:20.823Z <Rule:INFO> Garden lights on when the doors are open (rule-lb2h69nb in Outside Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET! [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:53:07.676Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Garden lights on when the doors are open<SET> (rule-lb2h69nb:S) from step 2 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:53:07.677Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera perform action power_switch.off on Switch#vera>device_20060 with [Object]{ } [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:53:07.678Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera perform action power_switch.set on Switch#vera>device_20060 with [Object]{ "state": false } [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:53:07.719Z <VeraController:NOTICE> VeraController#vera action power_switch.set([Object]{ "state": false }) on Switch#vera>device_20060 succeeded [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:53:07.720Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Garden lights on when the doors are open<SET> (rule-lb2h69nb:S) from step 3 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:53:07.721Z <Engine:INFO> Garden lights on when the doors are open<SET> all actions completed. [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:04.468Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: [FetchError] network timeout at: http://192.168.70.249:3480/data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912953&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538886459 [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.646Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20050: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20050) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.646Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.646Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20050 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.656Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20570: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20570) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.656Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.656Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20570 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.678Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20610: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20610) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.679Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.679Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20610 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.744Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20631: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20631) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.744Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.744Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20631 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.889Z <VeraController:NOTICE> VeraController#vera reload detected! [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.910Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20050: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20050) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.910Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.910Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20050 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.935Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20570: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20570) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.936Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.936Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20570 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.937Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20610: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20610) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.937Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.937Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20610 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.939Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20631: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20631) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.939Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.939Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20631 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.968Z <Controller:INFO> VeraController#vera 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.037Z <VeraController:NOTICE> VeraController#vera reload detected!That repeats until something like this:
[latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.049Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20050: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20050) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.049Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.049Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20050 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.053Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20570: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20570) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.053Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.053Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20570 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.062Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20610: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20610) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.062Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.062Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20610 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.112Z <VeraController:WARN> VeraController#vera failed to apply attribute scene_activation.scene_id to Entity#vera>device_20631: [TypeError] Can't set NaN on attribute scene_activation.scene_id (vera>device_20631) [-] [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.112Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:10.113Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20631 [latest-24366]2025-01-10T20:00:05.003Z <Engine:INFO> [Engine]Engine#1 master timer tick, local time "10/01/2025 20:00:05" (TZ offset 0 mins from UTC) [latest-24366]2025-01-10T20:13:51.872Z <Rule:INFO> No motion in Cinema (rule-m4ocglke in Cinema Environment) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET! [latest-24366]2025-01-10T20:13:51.882Z <Rule:INFO> Cinema Heater On (rule-m4ocf1di in Cinema Environment) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET! [latest-24366]2025-01-10T20:13:51.888Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Cinema Heater On<SET>" (rule-m4ocf1di:S)And the errors / reloads just stop.
From Openluup:
2025-01-10 19:49:56.379 luup_log:63: BroadLink_Mk2 debug: RM3 Mini - IR 1: urn:schemas-micasaverde-com:device:IrTransmitter:1 2025-01-10 19:50:00.085 luup_log:0: 14Mb, 1.7%cpu, 36.1days 2025-01-10 19:50:07.591 luup.variable_set:: 20160.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:EnergyMetering1.KWH was: 18.6793008 now: 18.6805008 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:07.591 luup.variable_set:: 20160.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:EnergyMetering1.KWHReading was: 1736538000 now: 1736538600 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:07.591 luup.variable_set:: 20160.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:EnergyMetering1.Watts was: 7.4 now: 7.3 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:07.591 luup.variable_set:: 20170.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:EnergyMetering1.KWH was: 32.2417984 now: 32.2470016 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:07.591 luup.variable_set:: 20170.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:EnergyMetering1.KWHReading was: 1736538000 now: 1736538600 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:07.591 luup.variable_set:: 20330.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:EnergyMetering1.KWHReading was: 1736538000 now: 1736538600 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:07.592 luup.variable_set:: 20770.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.Tripped was: 0 now: 1 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:07.592 luup.variable_set:: 20770.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.LastTrip was: 1736534850 now: 1736538607 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:07.593 openLuup.server:: request completed (3392 bytes, 1 chunks, 12875 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c3299a9cf8 2025-01-10 19:50:07.618 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c3299a9cf8 2025-01-10 19:50:07.624 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c329d0a5b8 2025-01-10 19:50:07.624 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912906&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538607623 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c329d0a5b8 2025-01-10 19:50:07.632 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c3292ed678 2025-01-10 19:50:07.633 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?newTargetValue=1&DeviceNum=20060&id=action&serviceId=urn%3Aupnp-org%3AserviceId%3ASwitchPower1&action=SetTarget&output_format=json&_r=1736538607631 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c3 292ed678 2025-01-10 19:50:07.633 luup.call_action:: 20060.urn:upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchPower1.SetTarget 2025-01-10 19:50:07.633 luup.call_action:: action will be handled by parent: 37 2025-01-10 19:50:07.633 luup.variable_set:: 20060.urn:upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchPower1.Target was: 0 now: 1 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:07.669 openLuup.server:: request completed (35 bytes, 1 chunks, 35 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c3292ed678 2025-01-10 19:50:07.673 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c3292ed678 2025-01-10 19:50:07.776 openLuup.server:: request completed (821 bytes, 1 chunks, 151 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c329d0a5b8 2025-01-10 19:50:07.784 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c329d0a5b8 2025-01-10 19:50:07.795 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c3287bc8f8 2025-01-10 19:50:07.796 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912907&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538607794 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c3287bc8f8 2025-01-10 19:50:08.644 luup.variable_set:: 20060.urn:upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchPower1.Status was: 0 now: 1 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:08.950 openLuup.server:: request completed (821 bytes, 1 chunks, 1154 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c3287bc8f8 2025-01-10 19:50:08.958 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c3287bc8f8 2025-01-10 19:50:08.969 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c3297e95a8 2025-01-10 19:50:08.970 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912908&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538608969 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c3297e95a8 2025-01-10 19:50:19.181 luup.variable_set:: 20770.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.Tripped was: 1 now: 0 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:19.585 openLuup.server:: request completed (832 bytes, 1 chunks, 10615 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c3297e95a8 2025-01-10 19:50:19.602 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c3297e95a8 2025-01-10 19:50:19.605 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c328d298a8 2025-01-10 19:50:19.605 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912909&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538619604 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c328d298a8 2025-01-10 19:50:34.950 openLuup.server:: request completed (593 bytes, 1 chunks, 15344 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c328d298a8 2025-01-10 19:50:34.953 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c328d298a8 2025-01-10 19:50:34.965 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c328c48a58 2025-01-10 19:50:34.966 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912909&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538634964 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c328c48a58 2025-01-10 19:50:34.989 luup.variable_set:: 25019.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.Tripped was: 0 now: 1 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:34.990 luup.variable_set:: 25019.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.LastTrip was: 1736534437 now: 1736538634 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:35.094 openLuup.server:: request completed (975 bytes, 1 chunks, 127 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c328c48a58 2025-01-10 19:50:35.101 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c328c48a58 2025-01-10 19:50:35.113 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c32985e298 2025-01-10 19:50:35.113 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912911&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538635111 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c32985e298 2025-01-10 19:50:40.255 luup.variable_set:: 25021.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:LightSensor1.CurrentLevel was: 0 now: 30 #hooks:1 2025-01-10 19:50:40.256 scheduler.watch_callback:: 25021.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:LightSensor1.CurrentLevel called [20]DataWatcherCallback() function: 0x55c3288a8d20 2025-01-10 19:50:40.460 openLuup.server:: request completed (835 bytes, 1 chunks, 5346 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c32985e298 2025-01-10 19:50:40.472 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c32985e298 2025-01-10 19:50:40.478 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c329b28238 2025-01-10 19:50:40.479 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912912&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538640478 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c329b28238 2025-01-10 19:50:44.471 luup.variable_set:: 25007.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.Tripped was: 0 now: 1 #hooks:1 2025-01-10 19:50:44.472 luup.variable_set:: 25007.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.LastTrip was: 1736538400 now: 1736538644 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:50:44.472 scheduler.watch_callback:: 25007.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.Tripped called [20]DataWatcherCallback() function: 0x55c3288a8d20 2025-01-10 19:50:44.775 openLuup.server:: request completed (975 bytes, 1 chunks, 4296 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c329b28238 2025-01-10 19:50:44.775 openLuup.server:: request completed (975 bytes, 1 chunks, 4296 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c329b28238 2025-01-10 19:50:44.782 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c329b28238 2025-01-10 19:50:44.793 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c328f1e968 2025-01-10 19:50:44.793 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912914&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538644791 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c328f1e968 2025-01-10 19:51:00.122 openLuup.server:: request completed (593 bytes, 1 chunks, 15328 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c328f1e968 2025-01-10 19:51:00.125 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c328f1e968 2025-01-10 19:51:00.136 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c32995b318 2025-01-10 19:51:00.136 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912914&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538660134 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c32995b318 2025-01-10 19:51:15.481 openLuup.server:: request completed (593 bytes, 1 chunks, 15344 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c32995b318 2025-01-10 19:51:15.484 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c32995b318 2025-01-10 19:51:15.495 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c32998b068 2025-01-10 19:51:15.497 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912914&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538675493 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c32998b068 2025-01-10 19:51:30.869 openLuup.server:: request completed (593 bytes, 1 chunks, 15371 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c32998b068 2025-01-10 19:51:30.872 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c32998b068 2025-01-10 19:51:30.884 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c32905bda8 2025-01-10 19:51:30.885 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912914&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538690882 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c32905bda8 2025-01-10 19:51:32.886 luup.variable_set:: 20380.urn:upnp-org:serviceId:TemperatureSensor1.CurrentTemperature was: 21 now: 22 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:51:33.090 openLuup.server:: request completed (841 bytes, 1 chunks, 2205 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c32905bda8 2025-01-10 19:51:33.100 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c32905bda8 2025-01-10 19:51:33.112 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c328de0d58 2025-01-10 19:51:33.112 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912915&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538693111 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c328de0d58 2025-01-10 19:51:36.064 luup.variable_set:: 25007.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.Tripped was: 1 now: 0 #hooks:1 2025-01-10 19:51:36.065 scheduler.watch_callback:: 25007.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.Tripped called [20]DataWatcherCallback() function: 0x55c3288a8d20 2025-01-10 19:51:36.369 openLuup.server:: request completed (832 bytes, 1 chunks, 3256 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c328de0d58 2025-01-10 19:51:36.377 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c328de0d58 2025-01-10 19:51:36.387 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c329054188 2025-01-10 19:51:36.388 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912916&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538696386 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c329054188 2025-01-10 19:51:37.134 luup.variable_set:: 20380.urn:upnp-org:serviceId:TemperatureSensor1.CurrentTemperature was: 22 now: 21 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:51:37.540 openLuup.server:: request completed (841 bytes, 1 chunks, 1152 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c329054188 2025-01-10 19:51:37.553 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c329054188 2025-01-10 19:51:37.566 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c328d97568 2025-01-10 19:51:37.566 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912917&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538697564 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c328d97568 2025-01-10 19:51:41.367 luup.variable_set:: 20380.urn:upnp-org:serviceId:TemperatureSensor1.CurrentTemperature was: 21 now: 22 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:51:41.874 openLuup.server:: request completed (841 bytes, 1 chunks, 4307 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c328d97568 2025-01-10 19:51:41.884 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c328d97568 2025-01-10 19:51:41.895 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c329385678 2025-01-10 19:51:41.896 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912918&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538701894 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c329385678 2025-01-10 19:51:57.168 openLuup.server:: request completed (593 bytes, 1 chunks, 15272 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c329385678 2025-01-10 19:51:57.171 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c329385678 2025-01-10 19:51:57.183 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c329b092b8 2025-01-10 19:51:57.184 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912918&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538717182 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c329b092b8 2025-01-10 19:52:00.124 luup_log:0: 14Mb, 1.6%cpu, 36.1days 2025-01-10 19:52:00.476 openLuup.server:: request completed (1841 bytes, 1 chunks, 3292 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c329b092b8 2025-01-10 19:52:00.483 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c329b092b8 2025-01-10 19:52:00.495 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c3297be088 2025-01-10 19:52:00.495 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912929&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538720494 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c3297be088 2025-01-10 19:52:09.867 luup.variable_set:: 25021.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:LightSensor1.CurrentLevel was: 30 now: 0 #hooks:1 2025-01-10 19:52:09.868 scheduler.watch_callback:: 25021.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:LightSensor1.CurrentLevel called [20]DataWatcherCallback() function: 0x55c3288a8d20 2025-01-10 19:52:10.071 openLuup.server:: request completed (834 bytes, 1 chunks, 9575 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c3297be088 2025-01-10 19:52:10.079 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c3297be088 2025-01-10 19:52:10.088 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c329c16a08 2025-01-10 19:52:10.089 openLuup.server:: GET /data_request?id=status&Timeout=15&DataVersion=416912930&MinimumDelay=50&output_format=json&_r=1736538730087 HTTP/1.1 tcp{client}: 0x55c329c16a08 2025-01-10 19:52:16.194 luup.variable_set:: 20770.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.Tripped was: 0 now: 1 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:52:16.195 luup.variable_set:: 20770.urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SecuritySensor1.LastTrip was: 1736538607 now: 1736538736 #hooks:0 2025-01-10 19:52:16.498 openLuup.server:: request completed (976 bytes, 1 chunks, 6409 ms) tcp{client}: 0x55c329c16a08 2025-01-10 19:52:16.515 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection closed openLuup.server.receive closed tcp{client}: 0x55c329c16a08 2025-01-10 19:52:16.516 openLuup.io.server:: HTTP:3480 connection from 192.168.70.249 tcp{client}: 0x55c328dbad18Nothing I can see indicating that Openluup is reloading?
.249 IP address is the internal IP of the NUC that hosts both Openluup and MSR.
Any thoughts as to how I can troubleshoot this? It's not a big deal, but would like to get to the bottom of it.
I should add that all the devices listed in entries like this:
[latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.744Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera class scene_controller meta [Object]{ "source": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:SceneController1/sl_SceneActivated", "expr": "int(value)" } orig final NaN [latest-24366]2025-01-10T19:55:09.744Z <VeraController:CRIT> *Entity#vera>device_20631Are the tamper switches on Fibaro FGMS001 multifunction detectors, of which I have 4, and they correspond exactly to the devices listed.
TIA
C
And then MSR...
My first issue: I'm logged into the msr CT as reactor (I used the suggested username just to keep things simple as this is new space for me and I was high off my success of migrating HA over).
When I run
docker pull toggledbits/reactor:latest-amd64... it assigns the \reactor\ subdirectory where installed root ownership. I am absolutely logged in with the correct non-root user.
1c58aead-85ca-4b2c-8f48-c3d1f57d7fe3-image.png
Second issue: I copied over the following folders:
67e7e4a5-cee8-4de1-90c7-1df35f1070b9-image.png
When MSR loads, all of my Global Expressions are missing.
Third issue:
All controllers connect wonderfully (Hubitat, etc)... except HA.
After changing ownership of the logs to reactor again I can see this when MSR calls HA:
Yes, I created a fresh new long-lived access token for the MSR containerized install and updated the reactor.yaml config file correctly.
Honestly, all-in-all, for my total lack of expertise here I'm very pleased that I only have these three issues. But they are def blockers atm.
My RPi bare metal install of MSR hooked right up to the new HA and is humming along just fine (I used hostnames were possible and shuffled some IPs in other places so I wouldn't run into things later that were mapped incorrectly that I'd forgotten about.)
Proxmox 8.3.2 MSR lives in an Ubuntu 24.04 Proxmox container MSR is latest docker versionWhat else can I provide to those smarter than me here?
Hi
I was looking at an old rule and I wanted to edit it, to add another Constraint, however I cannot seem to do it.
On this screen shot you can see an existing entry in the Constraints and on its pull down menu the "Changes" option is available.
09735de3-8e92-4e12-bfa2-5191f48924a7-image.png
However on the new line I just added I have no changes option in its pull down menu.
d85c4067-880e-4281-a12b-dac4d316a4da-image.png
Here is the original now locked post about this topic.
https://smarthome.community/topic/395/contact-sensor-opened-1-minute-ago-how?_=1736354690742
If you look on the old screen shots on that post, I was using the "changes" operator. Like this:
a1262e01-d3fd-4723-872f-872f1f6d9899-image.png
However today when I edited this rule the operators are showing as == and not as changes on all the entries in the Constraints area.
Also the old entries now say -- and the value is blank. But on the new line I just added it says that is not valid, so not sure how the old lines are like that.
a458d52d-214d-4862-a2b7-d31009f89cde-image.png
So I am a bit confused what happened.
Thanks
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.@toggledbits I understand that you do not perform testing on Mac computers but thought I'd share the following with you in case something can be done.
I started seeing these errors with version 24302. I thought that upgrading to 24343 would have fixed the issue but unfortunately not. I either have to close the browser or clear the cache for the errors to stop popping-up but they slowly come back.
I see these errors on the following browsers:
Safari 16.6.1 on macOS Big Sur Safari 18.1.1 on MacOS Sonoma DuckDuckGo 1.118.0 on macOS Big Sur and Sonoma Firefox 133.0.3 on macOS Big Sur Chrome 131.0.6778 on macOS Big SurHere are the errors
Safari while creating/updating an expression
@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:543:91 makeExprMenu@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:537:28 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:92:64 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:68 each@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:3133 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:35 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:98:44 forEach@[native code] @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:95:54 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:106:44 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/Observable.js:78:28 signalModified@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/ee.js:146:21 signalModified@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:40:29 reindexExpressions@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:71:32 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:608:40 dispatch@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:40040DuckDuckGo while clicking on status
http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-status.js:789:44 asyncFunctionResume@[native code] saveGridLayout@[native code] dispatchEvent@[native code] _triggerEvent@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:1401:30 _triggerAddEvent@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:1383:31 makeWidget@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:968:30 addWidget@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:388:24 placeWidgetAdder@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-status.js:183:44Firefox while updating a rule
@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:543:91 makeExprMenu@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:537:28 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:92:64 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:68 each@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:3133 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:35 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:98:44 forEach@[native code] @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:95:54 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:106:44 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/Observable.js:78:28 notifySaved@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/ee.js:82:21 notifySaved@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:47:26 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-rules.js:1460:39 forEach@[native code] @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-rules.js:1459:58Chrome while creating/updating an expression
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'getEditor') at RuleEditor.makeExprMenu (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/rule-editor.js:1788:86) at Object.handler (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/rule-editor.js:2174:54) at http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:98:44 at Array.forEach (<anonymous>) at MessageBus._sendToBus (http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:95:54) at MessageBus.send (http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:106:44) at ExpressionEditor.publish (http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/Observable.js:78:28) at ExpressionEditor.signalModified (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/ee.js:146:14) at ExpressionEditor.signalModified (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:40:15) at ExpressionEditor.reindexExpressions (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:71:18) ``Not sure that it is the same issue but just got this on built 24302 when running a reaction for testing purpose. Despite the error message, the reaction ran properly.
Error: Command timeout (195 start_reaction)
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.2.163:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:552:136)
1a3422eb-d760-4609-a740-a40d04a6bab2-Screenshot 2024-12-29 231851.png
Thanks to @toggledbits for adding a custom CSS. I've started doing a darker Reactor style.
Here's the file: https://gist.github.com/dbochicchio/825098ac13b7f8cac22012eae37ff7ce
A couple of things are still too bright and I'll eventually catch-up. Just place it under your /config directory, naming the file as customstyles.css. Hard refresh your browser.
Hi
Having to rebuild my Linux Debian box as the SSD failed. And I have forgotten exactly what I did the first time to get it all setup.
I have Debian 12 up and running on the new SSD, I only have console no Desktop GUI.
I am trying to do the bare metal install for MSR. However I am not sure if I am meant to install nodejs whlist logged in as the root user or as the none root user with my name ?
I used putty and connected via SSH and logged in as root and I installed nodejs but I think this was wrong as when logged in as my user name and I do a node -v command it says node is not installed or doesn't show any version number anyway.
But when logged in as root and I do a node -v command it does show me its installed and displays the version number. maybe its a path issue for my username and he can't see node is installed?
So now I am thinking I should of installed node whilst logged in as my user name and not as the root user.
This is how I installed nodejs as whilst logged in as root
ac7bf6c3-23ad-46fc-8ada-44af6704e63e-image.png
Thanks in advance.
As the title says, here's my OpenAI Controller for Reactor:
OpenAI Controller per Reactor. Contribute to dbochicchio/reactor-openai development by creating an account on GitHub.
It supports both OpenAI and Azure OpenAI endpoints. You'll need keys/endpoints, according to each service.
The controller supports multiple models, and each one could be mapped as an entity.
It's quite easy to use, and responses can be stored in variables, for easy access. Or sent to another action (Text To Speech, another endpoint, etc).
9013ae50-fd68-42a2-87c3-97479132e465-image.png
80a88eec-7c89-464a-8196-690b4b72d044-image.png
Have fun with LLM into your scenes!
In Home Assistant I have an integration that if I add entities to it, I will get the following error in MSR as certain entity values I'm using in expressions are null for a moment. This is more or less cosmetic issue and happens very rarely as I rarely modify that integration on the hass side.
Screenshot 2024-11-28 at 22.20.41.png
And the expression is
Screenshot 2024-11-28 at 22.38.19.png
Could I "wrap" hass-entity shown above somewhat differently to prevent this error from happening? Using build 24302.
Hello
I am trying to set up Multi System Reactor to automate routines across multiple smart home devices & platforms (e.g., Home Assistant, SmartThings, and Hubitat). While I have successfully linked the systems; I am facing issues with:
-Delays in triggering actions on secondary devices.
-Inconsistent execution of complex logic conditions.
-Synchronization of states between devices when one system updates.
Is there a recommended way to optimize performance & confirm seamless state sharing across systems?
I have checked https://smarthome.community/category/22/multi-system-reactor-msbi guide for reference but still need advice.
Any tips on debugging or log analysis to pinpoint where the issue arises would also be appreciated.
Thank you !
I've managed to use MSR UI on iOS devices to some degree*, so that although UI elements (e.g. rule sets) are not visible in portrait mode, you've seen them in landscape. Now with recents builds (24302) this does not work anymore, elements (rule sets, entities) are not anymore visible in landscape mode.
Does anyone have similar experiences? Using iOS 18 and Safari/Chrome browser.
( *Drag & drop of rule conditions have never worked on a mobile)
@toggledbits Since I have upgraded ZWaveJSController to 24293 from 24257 I am seeing entries related to registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability 143 every time I restart Reactor.
The Siren seems to be doing what it is supposed to do. The volume levels are fine. Should I worry about it?
Reactor version 24302
ZWaveJSController version 24293
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.27.4
zwave-js version 14.3.4
I have the following ACL defined:
groups: admin: users: - admin applications: true api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: trueAnd I have authenticated to MSR as "admin" user. However, I'm getting "access denied" when trying to access http://*******:8111/api/v1/log
So what I'm missing, is my ACL incorrectly defined?
Using build 24302 on Docker.
Hi
I have just connected a bunch of EzloPi controllers to MSR to import some ESP based devices etc.
They all seemed to have worked and imported in to MSR apart from I have one missing device. It is a Digital Gas Sensor device.
This is how that device looks in the Ezlo API.
Devices Info:
_id: "10696001" deviceTypeId: "ezlopi" parentDeviceId: "10696000" category: "level_sensor" subcategory: "" gatewayId: "457a5069" batteryPowered: false name: "Gas Sensor Digital" type: "sensor" reachable: true persistent: true serviceNotification: false armed: false roomId: "" security: "no" ready: true status: "idle" parentRoom: true protectConfig: "default"Items Info:
_id: "20696001" deviceId: "10696001" hasGetter: true hasSetter: false name: "smoke_density" show: true valueType: "substance_amount" scale: "parts_per_million" value: 2.7472610473632812 valueFormatted: "2.75" status: "idle"There is also an Analog Gas sensor that one did import in to MSR OK.
68d63dab-b871-4f44-912b-cf6e0b9eb4c6-image.png
Devices Info:
_id: "10696000" deviceTypeId: "ezlopi" parentDeviceId: "10696000" category: "security_sensor" subcategory: "gas" gatewayId: "457a5069" batteryPowered: false name: "Gas Sensor Analog" type: "sensor" reachable: true persistent: true serviceNotification: false armed: false roomId: "" security: "no" ready: true status: "idle" parentRoom: true protectConfig: "default"Items Info:
_id: "20696000" deviceId: "10696000" hasGetter: true hasSetter: false name: "gas_alarm" show: true valueType: "token" enum: 0: "no_gas" 1: "combustible_gas_detected" 2: "toxic_gas_detected" 3: "unknown" valueFormatted: "no_gas" value: "no_gas" status: "idle"And this is how this MQ2 Gas Sensor looks like on their dashboard:
Digital
cb77dfa3-4af5-4d06-9635-89207a716a89-image.png
Analog
4fb4da1b-e946-4b89-876c-bcd9f5699b6c-image.png
They have an EzloPi website here you can create your own sensor projects using ESP boards, which is very interesting stuff!
And I just wrote on the Ezlo forum here, how to connect an EzloPi controller to MSR.
THANKS.
Change in Plans (Don't Panic)
-
Everyone, I've had a change in thinking.
As many of you know, I had decided to not build an MSR interface for eZLO's new controllers, for multiple reasons, not the least of which was that I had chosen not to use an eZLO hub in my future HA. I am currently straddling three hubs: Vera, Home Assistant, and Hubitat. I am actually very much enjoying the flexibility this has provided. But these three hubs are enough for the moment, and when the venerable Vera Plus on which my house has operated since 2017 dies, I will likely just move the rest of my ZWave devices to the other hubs and reduce by one.
Another reason for my previous decision was the risk of fluidity/instability in the eZLO APIs. Since this is first generation work, and even now as they approach the three-year mark on development and are still in "beta" with much functionality still incomplete or missing altogether (plugin UI framework?... anyone? anyone?), it stands to reason that, like all projects in this phase in particular, choices are made that need to be revisited. To be fair, Hass and Hubitat are not immune from this either, even as much more mature products with greater market penetration. In any case, I've demurred because of the high perceived risk of change and breakage, and didn't want to put myself (again) on the critical path of my own user base waiting for me to catch up. I accept now, however, that events like this are just part and parcel of the environment in which I've chosen to work. As I said, if it's not eZLO changing something, it's going to be Hass, or something else. I haven't had a breaking change hit from the Hubitat side yet, but it's probably just a matter of time. Just as I seek to improve my work, they must seek to improve theirs.
The upshot is that I've decided to write an eZLO interface, and I've been working on that for a few days and now have a working prototype running. It works with the few devices I have available for it, and there's a lot that's assumed and untested about all the others. Think back to March, when MSR was first released -- the process of going through and stabilizing these interfaces under all the different external conditions, with devices in your environments that I don't, and sometimes cannot, have -- it takes time. Drilling out all of the details of device behaviors and data, and how each hub handles them differently, takes time. But it's going to be a reality. Aside from this, reading the other forums makes me realize just how much this is needed, if only because there appears as yet to be no articulated concrete plan (e.g. words beyond a promise with no date) to support easy migration from a Vera to an eZLO. MSR touts itself as a tool to assist such migrations between hubs. An eZLO interface must exist.
To set expectations: you'll see the first version of this interface in a build in the next couple of weeks. It will be an add-in. Like MSR itself, I will be limiting the initial audience, and those of you that participate in the early use and testing will be asked to provide lots of diagnostics and feedback (so please don't ask/participate if you're not willing and able to put in the time). It's brand new, unfinished work; there will be lots of bugs, and lots of holes, and it's going to take a lot to get them all squashed and filled, respectively.
Based on what I've learned so far from this project, I also want to forewarn you that it may include access to my cloud infrastructure for automatic logging (to make our mutual efforts to examine problems easier and faster), at least during the early stages. At the moment, MSR has no hard Internet-access dependencies, so this is a change for this interface work.
Also, I probably will ultimately be charging a modest monthly or annual subscription for the eZLO interface, which is a change from policy and practice to date. The amount of effort the project has demanded and can demand in future makes it necessary that I consider a business model. I know that gives some pause, but it should also give you confidence that I am thinking of a long-term future. But, those of you who, as of this writing, hold active accounts on the MSR bug tracker and have participated so valuably in the testing and improvement of MSR, are grand-fathered in to a perpetual (personal/non-commercial use) license to MSR and this interface (no fees, at least for what parts are produced by my hand; I cannot control what others may choose to do if/when third party development takes root). I am considering extending that benefit to everyone who has donated to my projects from the start to date; that is, including those who supported Reactor for Vera, without which MSR would never had been born.
I can probably predict from these forums and others who the active eZLO users are going to be, but if you want to work with me on it, please let me know by reply here. I will be relying on you heavily, because I am not going to be a big consumer of the hub, so a lot of the work will require data collected from you and your hub and investigative work on that evidence, rather than first-hand experience and witnessed events in my own environment. But I'm confident it will work, as much gets done this way already, and investing in more and deeper troubleshooting tools is always a good investment.
Thanks to all of you who have supported this project. Onward...
-
Looking forward to seeing the Ezlo version of MSR, I don't use the Ezlo hubs so I won't be able to contribute but with the addition of MSR it may make switching from my Vera Plus to an Ezlo controller a total possibility. I am sure MSR will become a staple for the platform just like how Reactor was in the Vera controllers. Good luck Patrick!!!
-
MSR has enabled me to explore Hubitat and I have been impressed with many features. Zigbee works much better and I have added devices that integrate well into my home control most of which is on VeraPlus. I am slowly moving to the VeraPlus just hosting the devices with most of the control through MR.
I pay for Altui and was thinking the other day I would not be opposed to a subscription plan for MSR as it is more valuable to me than Altui.
I was thinking about playing with Home Assistant but could pick up an ezlo plus controller if you are looking for guinea pigs. I could certainly give you the view of someone who just knows enough to be dangerous.
Thanks for all your work helping folks realize their home automation dreams. -
@Pabla To be clear, MSR will not run on the eZLO hub, just as it does not run on Hubitat or Vera. MSR will always run on independent hardware (Hass can be an exception because you are in control of the host hardware). So if you're running MSR on Synology, RPI, or your favorite Linux or Windows host, it will interface with eZLO in exactly the same way that it does with Vera, Hass, and Hubitat.
-
@toggledbits Ah yes that's what I mean't
-
I have an Ezlo Plus and an Ezlo Atom. On the Elzo Plus I have lots of devices on there, however most of them are emulated virtual devices mirrored from the "real" devices on my production Vera Plus, this was done using Rene's 3rd party Vera to Ezlo bridge plugin.
I do also have some real Z-Wave devices paired directly to the Ezlo Plus hub.
I would be happy to help test this new MSR interface and I am very happy to see you have decided to make it. This is a massive boost for Ezlo themselves in my opinion as they currently have no native logic rules engine of their own.
The "rule sets" in the beta Ezlo web GUI are basic and pretty much Vera scenes you would find in the Vera mobile app and only have a little improvement thus far, for example we now have basic AND / OR however in these scenes, which we never had on the Vera firmware hubs.
PM me if you want direct access to my Ezlo Plus controller happy for you to poke around and have a look at it.
-
@toggledbits I bought 2 test controllers a while back, and I would be more than happy to help any way I can.
Do you have any idea what use case/device interaction scope would look like to give you the data you need?
I am pretty flexible over here...
-
@toggledbits I’m so thankful for the time and effort you put into MSR so the least I can do is give something back. I’d love to participate with my Ezlo Plus running about 20 zigbee devices in production, the logic is already in MSR so switching to a new interface would be easy for testing.
-
Thanks to all who have replied/volunteered. Variety of devices is key, so anything and everything is helpful. As you may have seen in these forums, even several months into fairly stable integrations for the other hubs, devices keep popping up with little exceptions or gaps in completion. More data is better is less. All of the interfaces drop files in the
logs
folder at the moment that I can use for fairly good diagnostics and forensics, so that theme will continue and get some embellishments for eZLO.I expect the first wave of testing will just be "look and see"... do the devices come in as correct MSR entities, do they have their correct attributes, and are they correctly identified and, where appropriate, assigned sensible system capabilities (in addition to extension capabilities of the
x_ezlo_etc
variety). Startup configuration is also always a first-level challenge, and in this case, we'll have two different options: secured access (login through eZLO's cloud to get a local access token), and unsecured access (secured access can be disabled on the hub, eliminating the need for cloud login/token requests to get local access to the hub). Login + attributes will enable all of the rule/condition capabilities automatically. The second wave will follow immediately (as in with the next breath) to see that actions work and to what extent they need extension or repair, and that completes reactions. Things converged pretty quickly with the other three interfaces, so I'm hopeful this can be highly functional in short order. -
I have a VeraPlus (daily driver), another VeraPlus (used/spare), an eZLO Atom 2.0 (unused), Vera Edge running the LInux f/w (unused), an eZLO Plus (beta testing / unused) and an old Vera 1 (connected / idle) divided among two different residences.
@toggledbits , surely others have made a similar offer by now, so I presume you are "set" for want of controllers -- but IF you require any of these for use in-house, just ask and I'll happily ship/donate.
Likewise, IF you need me to test some particular thing out from my side (Synology NAS > Docker > MSR > hub(s)), also just ask. Who knows, it might be the first/last thing I ever do with eZLO hardware, which otherwise is going in the trash at some point.
Glad you made this decision; I was concerned that you might inadvertently wind up with spare time on your hands. Oh, and THANK YOU for so thoughtfully grandfathering those who've toiled in the trenches alongside you lo these many weeks and months. For that you will not be sorry.
- Libra
-
@librasun I actually have a pretty big fist full of controllers myself. It's not really controllers I'm wanting for, it's devices and environments. The more hands this touches that aren't mine, the more things break, and the better things get for it. Hold on to them!
@librasun said in Change in Plans (Don't Panic):
Who knows, it might be the first/last thing I ever do with eZLO hardware, which otherwise is going in the trash at some point.
I absolutely doubt most users of the Atom or PlugHub would be a user of MSR (except in some fringe cases, like for an out-building). But those eZLO Plus's (in full or prototype/skeletal form) could be useful. They seem to have a similar architecture to the Raspberry Pi 4. Maybe once I get the ZWaveJS interface fleshed out (that's also been in the works), I can just publish an MSR replacement firmware for the Plus hardware. You know, for science.
-
@toggledbits said in Change in Plans (Don't Panic):
can just publish an MSR replacement firmware for the Plus hardware. You know, for science
So would it also act as a Z-Wave radio?
Or would you still need another second hub like Vera or the Ezlo or Hubitat etc, to act as the Z-Wave controller?
-
ZWaveJS would just talk to the on-board ZWave chip (via a serial/USB interface). Vera works the same way. So, yes, it would function as the ZWave radio in addition to being the rules engine.
-
So an all in one controller then!
Might have to get my hands on another Ezlo Plus hub, so I can test both setups, native Ezlo or MSR with Z-Wave JS.
-
@toggledbits said in Change in Plans (Don't Panic):
So, yes, it would function as the ZWave radio in addition to being the rules engine.
Looking forward to this, so I could add openluup to the mix and call it a day
-
I have as many before me, a Ezlo Plus laying around, and collecting dust. I've been waiting for a good reason to use it. When I got the Ezlo Plus, and I heard of the new Z-wave standard with better range I went really hopeful. Combined with MSR it looked like a winning concept. But the lack of stabilty, a working UI, and non-beta made me loose interest. If I can contribute in any way, I'd be honoured.
-
While I think a complete replacement firmware would be a fun exercise (and very possibly useful), we already have shown with openLuup and MSR that a Vera on its own is pretty stable in a reduced role as a ZWave radio and little else. So far my testing with the eZLO hub is yielding similar results, with the added benefit that it's demonstrably more stable when ZWave devices become unreachable (the Achilles Heel of current Vera firmware). I suspect we'll find that MSR running on a Pi, NAS, or other host against an eZLO hub still on its native firmware gives almost all of the benefits, without the need to replace the firmware on the hub itself. It will be fun to try it both ways, but I suspect that the simplest solution is going to be the best. And it will be here in a few days, where figuring out the firmware replacement will likely take a good bit more effort (and so is not really a goal, currently, just more of an experiment for a future weekend).
-
Hi,
I have already commented on the other forum that my VeraPlus was saved from an incinerator or the tires of my car a few times, thanks to Reactor, and gained new life with MSR, so Patrick you know that you have in my person a collaborator (with limitations of technical knowledge), but a person who likes to explore and especially give suggestions that help users.
But, in my humble opinion, I will not make the mistake of buying an eZLO, I am seriously considering investing now in a Hubitat because I am tired of my VeraPlus being incompatible with any ZegBee or other devices with S2. The eZLO developers should follow the same line of not listening to the 3PP, the independent developers, and go back to repeating Vera's mistakes in my opinion.
This way I recognize your huge effort for the HA community, I am sure you have done a lot but in this new eZLO endeavor I will not be able to help, count me full on MSR for VeraPlus and Hubitat.