-
Hey Patrick, had to switch over my HA VM from VirtualBox to VMware since VirtualBox stopped playing well. Anyways I updated the IP address to the new VM IP and deleted the Long Lived Access Token and created a new one just in case (copy pasted the new token into the config file). Tried rebooting both the HA machine and the MSR one too and MSR is still not connecting. The only thing I have not tried yet is creating another controller entry, but I am worried it may create all new entities for everything forcing me to redo all my logic. Here are some logs:
[latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:09.753Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:01.083Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:14.780Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:24.791Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.813Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.820Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.820Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out -
Deleted some entities from HA and added some new ones but MSR is still showing the old ones and not all of the new ones. I restarted MSR and it hasn't changed, is there anyway to manually discover new entities and delete the old ones? Most of the new entities have shown up but a few haven't, however none of the deleted entities were removed from MSR.
I checked the core.entity_registry in HA and none of the entities that are shown in MSR are there.
Edit: I see the delete option under the entities tab in MSR, is that the only way to delete them?
-
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed. -
Patrick,
I've just imported a large set of rules from Vera, and I had already played with creating rules in MSR that are mixed throughout the existing Vera rules. Is there any sort of way to "find/replace" in MSR, so I can find all matches to the old rules and replace them with the new ones? -
Patrick,
Yesterday I migrated a large luup Reactor group over from Vera to MSR, following the directions to importing it from Vera in the documentation. One of the odd things in the migration was the conditional rules for House Modes. Many of my rules had conditions such as "House Mode is any of Home, Night, or changes to Away.The way the import did it was changes from 1,3 to null. This importation did not seem to trigger rules correctly.
I was able to fix all the instances by creating multiple triggers in a group:
Entity Attribute: House Mode (vera>housemode) x_vera_housemode.mode contains home
OR Entity Attribute: House Mode (vera>housemode) x_vera_housemode.mode contains nightIs this what you are expecting in importation?
-
Good morning all,
This weekend I've been playing around with Home Assistant as a replacement (long term) for my aging Vera platform. I'm pretty amazed how much more capability it has. On the other hand, the sheer amount of variables it pulls in from devices is massive.In any case, I have added Google Calendar into Home Assistant for things like Federal Holidays and my daughter's school calendar. It connected to them without issue, which I had been having problems with in Vera an GCal3.
I connected MSR to Home Assistant, so I can start using some of the systems I've integrated into Home Assistant in MSR, and continue migrating my luup Reactor rules over to MSR. Now I'm trying to create a rule based on if today is a Federal Holiday or not. Reactor sees the calendar just fine, however, for whatever reason, it's not pulling data for today, but the next event, which in this case is Columbus day, three weeks away. The attribute that is pulling this is x_haas_attr.message.
I tested with my daughter's school calendar, and it did have an entry for today, and none of the other values seemed to be different, such as a "true" or something to tell me there is an entry.
a8478a6e-d8eb-4572-ac84-c94ff012a1ec-image.png
60632486-e80b-4f0f-aed9-dc67113689a4-image.png
ab04cd0f-f849-4e14-be7d-f4c00735da77-image.png
The only thing I've been able to come up with, is there is a start_time attribute, which shows the date as 2022-10-10 00:00:00
1cbe4526-7f63-4329-a088-b331f1d03376-image.png
The only thing I can think of is there might be a way to compare the current system date to that date, but I can't seem to figure that out in MSR.
Has anybody done this? Any suggestions?
-
I started kicking around the VEC last evening, was cut short, and dug in a bit more this morning.
My reactor.yaml:
d3df4d99-aa7f-4b8b-8fb9-5a6c615daad9-image.png
I verified the yaml is good at https://yamlchecker.com/
What I'm seeing in MSR:
0f89ce8e-7abe-4779-baca-43123e030cf4-image.png
87560ded-7dfa-4340-8585-8be58ff22852-image.png
I believe I have followed all steps (standard disclaimers apply).
Anyone else started to tinker with this newness and, if so, what were your results?
-
Having just embarrassed myself to @toggledbits by asserting that the latest release somehow had a bug when in reality it was surfacing underlying issues with my approach to building out my rulesets and automations I wanted to ask the collective for their feedback on how they've designed their rulesets.
For me, I built out a list of Global Reactions that I commonly use. For instance, for mode changes I typically change the mode entity and write that mode to a variable for some future use. When building out a ruleset I just pull in that Global Reaction vs manually recreating the entity list as my ruleset Reaction. Example, for lighting:
270bbe18-9680-491d-81d4-20308a9fe63c-image.png
Each of these contains the appropriate group of lights to turn on/off, etc.
I also have what I've dubbed my "Armed for..." rulesets. These are rulesets that can be referenced as true or false in other rulesets. Example, for my various lighting configurations in and out of the house I have these:
0d9f55d4-5d5d-42e2-a83c-8afa95df08fb-image.png
I think this is resulting in reactions stomping on other reactions creating race conditions that result in things looking like they're working when, in reality, they're one restart away from disaster.
So how are you all designing your superstructure, if you will, at a high level?
-
Maybe more of a cosmetic issue, but certain entities could be hidden from entity actions as you cannot set any meaningful action? See Vera as an example:
Screenshot 2022-09-16 at 15.11.29.png
vera>system is then obviously a different story and should be there
-
Hi @toggledbits,
I have a bridge consuming Vera's variable using the MQTTController in MSR, and I've noticed that after I've updated to the latest version (22257), some variables are not echoed. I've already tried to reboot MSR, with no luck.
These variables are under urn:smarthome-community:serverId:Vacuum
0fe837ed-3a29-4d5d-a06c-445981d44e13-image.png
A trace via MQTT explorer:
cf919028-4f7b-4761-b99a-c3943945704a-image.pngMy config has just exclude_capabilities: [] and it was working OK before the latest build. Even /query command doesn't seem to retrieve all the attributes. The values are retrieved correctly from the Vera controller, and I could use them in MSR, they're just not echoed to the bridge. Thanks!
-
Good morning all,
I"m working on converting my luup Reactor scenes over to MSR, so I can eventually introduce an Ezlo plus into the mix and not loose all the work I've done with Reactor. If nothing else, this should free up some resources on my aging Vera Plus, and maybe speed up some functions. Maybe that's just wishful thinking.In any case, I'm moving move my first Reactor set, which is a set of rules to control the blilnds/window coverings in my home. I have two types of blinds:
iBlinds retrofit motors (IB2.1-ZWx) version from late 2019.
Bali roman shades with factory installed Somfy CSZ1 Z-wave motors.I'm setting up reactions for both types of window coverings. One of the problems I always had in Vera was with iBlinds, I had to do it by luup commands:
luup.call_action("urn:upnp-org:serviceId:Dimming1","SetLoadLevelTarget",{ newLoadlevelTarget="50" },316)The reason for this, is that the open position was 100%, and the close position was 0%. In other words, the blinds were closed one way 100% an closed 100% the other way. I've been informed by iBlinds support that even in Ezlo, they still do it this way, which is different than most other Z-wave controller manufacturers. I'm not sure how the others do it, but some how "open" is right in the middle (50%).
So, in MSR, i can still set the Dimming1.SetLoadLevelTarget to 50, but I also noticed some other commands I haven't seen before in Reactor
3cdeeb89-5986-45bc-8a3b-79067050a22c-image.png
Is there some way in MSR to set that middle value to 50% so I can use cover.open? The command cover.close works as expected, so I'm wondering how I might use that cover.set.
Thanks for any advise.
-
I configured OWM Weather on MSR (latest-22257-dd9b9271), created an account with OWM, generated an API key, put the key in the yaml file, and I’ve waited over a day now. OWM Weather shows as up on the the Controller Status widget.
I’ve tried to create a trigger or constraint to use the data, and nothing is really showing up.
5B8611C1-33D0-4D3C-B507-7383CB81E25A.jpeg
I only have a free subscription with OWM, but I was expecting some data.
Is this expected behavior (i.e., still in development), or do I do more configuration other than the .yaml file?’
I still am able to pull Weather data through Dark Sky in my Vera plus controller, however, I know that will no longer work at some point.
-
Was just looking at the new metadata stuff in Entities for a lamp. I was on the dimming.level attritube and I then changed the dim level of the lamp several times and some how I got all these windows.
I then selected a different attribute color_temperature.value and that window was then shown over the top of all the others.
267e6d0d-7245-4816-ac93-ac83cfda509e-image.png
I don't know how to close these windows down ?
b09fd5f1-fffe-40c2-8ba6-8cffacd1e28b-image.png
Thanks
-
Hey Patrick, similar to R4V it would be nice if we could set the max amount of time a condition pulses. Currently in MSR you can only set it to pulse once or repeat continually until the condition goes false.
I currently have a rule that pings dead devices and occasionally the dead device needs a few pings for it to come back alive but I don't want it to keep pinging forever if the device is actually not functioning.
-
Hi
Anyone else been having issues with the MSR web UI not connecting after a period of time? Or is it just me?
If I reboot the Linux Debian box then MSR starts working again and I can open the web UI and it says connected.
However after sometime I then cannot later connect to the web GUI. It just says connecting all the time.
I also have Node-Red and HA Bridge running on the same box and I can connect to those two fine still.
Thanks
-
Is is possible for MSR to show newly detected ZwaveJS devices in the current alerts windows like Hubitat and HA? New devices show in the Entities but there is not an alert.
-
Hi Patrick,
For as long as I can remember, I have red x's instead of icons in MSR.05f25684-b338-4f69-8d0a-8a482a9fe1a2-image.png
I am running MSR in Docker and am on version 22252. If hosted in the cloud, they could be getting blocked by pihole.
Thanks,
Roger -
TLDR: I'm getting an alert saying I have to edit and re-save a rule containing a HTTP POST request in order to update it, but following the instructions in the alert doesn't seem to fix the issue.
I am receiving this message in the Current Alerts when sending a HTTP POST request.
The action at step 1 of "Send Notification Reaction" (re-I7yq7e15) needs to be edited to update it to the latest stored form. The action will continue, but should be updated as soon as possible, before this form is deprecated and no longer functions. Just make a trivial edit to the "headers" argument and then save the reaction to update it.
Details:
I am using a self-hosted notification system - Gotify. Many of my rules use a HTTP POST action to send a notification through this system. The message contains a JSON body with the title, body, and message priority. It is posted to a URL on my LAN where the Gotify server resides.
When I updated to latest-22252-65e94b36 I started to receive the above error. Since I had the http request in many rules I took the opportunity to simplify things by moving the http request to a Reaction in the Reactions section of MSR. I created two variables to pass the notification content to the Reaction and now send all notifications via the one Reaction. Each rule that needs to send a reaction sets the variable values and then runs the Reaction.
For example, this rule runs if the Kitchen Main leak sensor detects a leak. It sets the variable "g_gotify_token" to a value (this is used as part of the URL when making the HTTP request) and sets "g_gotify"body" to a JSON formatted string. In this case that string is
{ "title":"Water Alert", "message": "Kitchen Main Leak Sensor Tripped", "priority": 8 }Finally, the rule runs the Reaction "Send Notification Reaction"
79fd4034-c611-4173-b4e4-18cf5091b453-image.png
That reaction contains the http request. It uses the variables in the URL and request body fields. The request headers field is static and is set to "Content-Type: application/json"
d75d9305-a5ab-4401-9b75-ea72d08787fa-image.png
I get the same error when I directly call the HTTP request from a rule without using any variables. Either way, the notification goes through successfully. The only issue is the alert being raised in MSR.
I tried editing and re-saving the Reaction, and also tried creating an entirely new reaction. I get the same warning message either way.
footnote: Because I use the same process to send a notification whenever there is an alert raised in MSR, this also created a loop (that thankfully got throttled pretty quickly) where the system was making the http request to send a notification that this alert had been raised, and the action of sending that notification raised the alert again... etc...
Is this just a bug? Am I missing something about the request format that needs to be updated? I checked the manual and this forum for answers, but didn't find anything that looked relevant.
-
I use a number of multistring devices in my vera plus. My 'original' multistring devices work in Reactor i.e.:
9c5203dd-1993-4b5b-aeee-44377c1ee1c5-image.png
42b97524-9428-4222-a3fb-ce4e0009c00b-image.png
However, the new ones I have added do not show the device data sets / parameters (not sure what the correct term is?):
a54ddf29-ea32-47c9-906e-260a25dcb482-image.png
3efa1d0a-5466-4220-93d3-0a67da42a5d0-image.png
Is there something that I am doing wrong?
-
Hi
Is it possible to access the information that the MSR has about the last date and time that a device suffered a change? The information that appears in the Entities area?
dfd353df-15f9-44ef-bda3-8351363ea486-image.png
Use Case: I want to monitor all devices, and those that are not communicating/acting for more than 48 hours, take notice and action
Of course there are some that will not communicate by their nature, such as a water valve, so a list of exceptions would be created.
The principle is almost the same as Hubitat's WatchDog APP, but I want to have my own, and not be dependent on Hubitat's communication or action.
Thanks.
[Solved] Is there a cap or max number of devices a Global Reaction should not exceed?
-
Noticed in the last few nights that my Global Reaction to turn on a mere six lights in the evenings the same two devices no longer turn on. One is a dimming smart bulb, the other is a wall outlet.
This has been running flawlessly for months - just in the last few nights I've noticed these two devices being left behind and yes, it's always these two devices only.
"What changed?"
- No Hubitat firmware updates
- No new devices added to Hubitat
- list itemTwo MSR updates (the last two, I keep up with the latest)
- list itemHome Assistant releases (should have zero bearing, HA is nothing more than pretty dashboards)
- list itemAdded MQTT to MSR
I did do a z-wave "repair" last night and am waiting to see if this helps.
Is there any maximum or cap on number of devices that should be included in a Global Reaction?
*Marked as solved as the question asked was answered. The issue persists but the question was answered.
-
You don't say specifically, but when you say "dimming smart bulb", I'm thinking plugin, not ZWave. Can be more specific about the devices involved?
To answer the question asked, no, there's no limit.
-
It's a smartbulb, unfortunately Hubitat labels it as "Generic ZWave Smart Dimmer" which is misleading. This appears to be a GoControl Z-Wave Dimmable LED Light Bulb, LB60Z-1.
The second device is also misleadingly named in Hubitat as "Generic Z-Wave Relay". It is a GoControl WO15Z outlet.
-
Something I don't do on Hubitat that I have to do on Vera is pace actions... by default, VeraController will not send actions more frequently than every 25ms, and this pace seems to work (there have not been any complaints about missing actions that can't be attributed to other causes).
Maybe Hubitat needs it too... that would be a bummer. If adding delays to your reaction resolves the issue, that points in that direction.
-
These just happen to be the last two devices in the Global Reaction. I'll add a one second delay ahead of each of them and see what happens tonight.
-
So the one second delay was implemented and, upon the anointed time the previously two missing lights were on as expected.
-
OK, so I'll add some pacing to Hubitat as well. That's disappointing.
-
As this has worked flawlessly since MSR was released I'm inclined this is an unfortunate code change somewhere in one of the last releases of Hubitat - although, their last release was some weeks ago. Perhaps something in one of the last couple MSR releases "triggered" something they'd changed that had previously been dormant? Dunno. Thinking aloud.
-
None of the recent code changes to Hubitat would affect the performance of actions. The most notable of the changes was resolution of race condition during startup (when the Mode and HSM states are truly updated during startup), and not remotely close to the action implementation. All of the other changes are trivial, and again, not near the action implementation.
It would be easy to prove that the actions are being sent, if you want to run a more detailed test. The logging of actions on Hubitat is, and has been for some time, unconditional, so there will be (or not) evidence in the logs that the actions were sent to Hubitat. If you remove your recently-added delays and run like it was until it fails again, then peruse the logs, I'm pretty sure you'll find those actions were being attempted, at least. I strongly suspect they will be there. If not, there's a high chance we'll see another reason for why they are not.
This highlights, again, that reporting problems in the blind isn't useful. The logs are there for a reason. If something on the engine side isn't working as expected, it should be among the first places you look.
Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.
-
Removed the delays I'd added and... everything ran just fine for the second night in a row (one with, one sans, the delays.). lol
-
Of course. The performance of the Hubitat and the mesh are also an issue here. It's a complex system with many variables.
Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.
-
I believe I am having a similar problem to the one discussed above, the perception that MSR is much faster than Hubitat.
I explain.
The MSR instantly receives everything that happens in Hubitat, any change of a device when it happens in Hubitat, immediately the MSR recognizes and if there is an action to be taken, immediately evaluates the action and fires the commands.
Then comes the problem, when the MSR triggers the actions for Hubitat devices, it loses actions, does not execute everything, hour an action is completed in all steps, hour fails. If I order to active 5 bulbs in sequence, almost always fails some, not always the same, varies on factors that I do not dominate.
And it doesn't need to have many actions, I have situations of quick reaction action as just turn on a light also failing.
Ok has the factor of the terrible signal from Hubitat (if compared to Vera), a bad management of the mesh network, where I see that the neighbours are poorly mapped and the mesh network poorly built.
But the failure scenario also happens with devices connected direct/next to the Hub.
In summary, the perception I have is that MSR is much faster than Hubitat that misses actions.
Include delay to each action would be a chaos, ok it can be a workaround, but it can't be the final solution.
Is it possible to have something in the configuration that creates the delay when sending each command to Hubitat? Like something like 0.5 seconds between actions?
I don't know if this would solve it, maybe you guys with more experience can point some way forward as the nightmare I had with Vera now happens on Hubitat.
Thanks.
-
@wmarcolin said in [Solved] Is there a cap or max number of devices a Global Reaction should not exceed?:
Is it possible to have something in the configuration that creates the delay when sending each command to Hubitat? Like something like 0.5 seconds between actions?
As stated in this thread, He added pacing to Hubitat.
From the docs:
action_pace — sets the minimum delay between actions sent to the hub (i.e. when a Reaction includes many); sending large numbers of requests can overwhelm the hub, it has been found, so this attempts to slow the pace to avoid this issue. The value must be an integer greater than 0, and the units are milliseconds; the default is 25."the nightmare I had with Vera now happens on Hubitat" If the problem was present before then I doubt that this will solve it.
Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.
-
@sweetgenius per your history above, by adding this delay to all actions, did it solve the problem? What time frame are you using? Did you leave the default at 25 milliseconds, or did you add more?
-
@wmarcolin said in [Solved] Is there a cap or max number of devices a Global Reaction should not exceed?:
per your history above,
I do not have any history above, Its not my thread nor did I comment until I read your post. I just read the thread and release notes and pointed out that both mention pacing.
Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.
-
@sweetgenius ops, thanks!
-
@toggledbits hi master!
I am going into a state of despair with Hubitat, and thinking that I have made a bad switch from VeraPlus to Hubitat.
Well, as you always comment, look at the log, as I already commented my suspicion that the MSR sent all commands to Hubitat, and this one that failed was confirmed, as you mention in your message.
Routines below.
Looking at the log, I don't understand what sequence the MSR performed, but I see that all of the above actions were sent to Hubitat without fail.
[latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.319Z <Rule:NOTICE> Rule#rule-kx9oxcss configuration changed; reloading [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.321Z <Rule:NOTICE> Rule#rule-kx9oxcss stopping rule [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.324Z <Rule:NOTICE> Rule Rule#rule-kx9oxcss stopped [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.325Z <Rule:INFO> Rule#rule-kx9oxcss (nGarden) started [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.327Z <Rule:INFO> nGarden (Rule#rule-kx9oxcss) SET! [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.331Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "nGarden<SET>" (rule-kx9oxcss:S) [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.345Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction nGarden<SET> (rule-kx9oxcss:S) [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.346Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for power_switch.on on Entity#hubitat>298: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/298/on [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.348Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "nLight Garden ON" (re-kx65h5u7) [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.350Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "nLight Security ON" (re-kx67amal) [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.352Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "nLight Corredor Evening" (re-kx659j8a) [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.377Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nGarden<SET> (rule-kx9oxcss:S) from step 4 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.378Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for power_switch.on on Entity#hubitat>296: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/296/on [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.379Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction nLight Garden ON (re-kx65h5u7) [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.380Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for power_switch.on on Entity#hubitat>97: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/97/on [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.381Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction nLight Security ON (re-kx67amal) [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.382Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for power_switch.on on Entity#hubitat>197: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/197/on [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.383Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction nLight Corredor Evening (re-kx659j8a) [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.384Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for power_switch.on on Entity#hubitat>419: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/419/on [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.456Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nGarden<SET> (rule-kx9oxcss:S) from step 5 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.457Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for power_switch.on on Entity#hubitat>297: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/297/on [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.563Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nLight Garden ON (re-kx65h5u7) from step 1 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.564Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for power_switch.on on Entity#hubitat>162: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/162/on [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.673Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nLight Security ON (re-kx67amal) from step 1 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.674Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for power_switch.on on Entity#hubitat>229: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/229/on [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.782Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nLight Corredor Evening (re-kx659j8a) from step 1 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.784Z <Engine:NOTICE> nLight Corredor Evening delaying until 1639705619783<16/12/2021 20:46:59> [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.889Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nGarden<SET> (rule-kx9oxcss:S) from step 6 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.890Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for power_switch.on on Entity#hubitat>449: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/449/on [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.995Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nLight Garden ON (re-kx65h5u7) from step 2 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:57.996Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for power_switch.on on Entity#hubitat>385: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/385/on [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:58.106Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nLight Security ON (re-kx67amal) from step 2 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:58.106Z <Engine:INFO> nLight Security ON all actions completed. [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:58.214Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nGarden<SET> (rule-kx9oxcss:S) from step 7 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:58.215Z <Engine:INFO> nGarden<SET> all actions completed. [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:58.321Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nLight Garden ON (re-kx65h5u7) from step 3 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:58.322Z <Engine:INFO> nLight Garden ON all actions completed. [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:59.795Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nLight Corredor Evening (re-kx659j8a) from step 2 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:59.796Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for color_temperature.set on Entity#hubitat>419: http://192.168.33.22/apps/api/67/devices/419/setColorTemperature/2850 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:59.800Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction nLight Corredor Evening (re-kx659j8a) from step 3 [latest-21349]2021-12-17T01:46:59.800Z <Engine:INFO> nLight Corredor Evening all actions completed.I have checked each of the devices, all are in the log. I am even using the action_pace: 100 setting and I see that the interval was obeyed.
But out of 10 lights that should be on, as you can see on the Hubitat's panel only 2 were.
Sorry @toggledbits to ask, and I will understand if you don't answer because I see that the MSR is perfect.
Any recommendations for Hubitat? Reset the whole Z-wave radio and pair it again? Any APP that can check radio occupancy or Hubitat processing? Maybe you with your experience can give me some guidance, and again sorry, I know it is not MSR, but I'm almost back to the Vera with all its problems of drive and evolution.
-
@wmarcolin I don't have a Hubitat myself but have you looked at the logs on the hub per https://docs.hubitat.com/index.php?title=Logs for hints of what is happening when set reaction fires?
-
@wmarcolin Something you've not surfaced, wireless interference. How close is your Hubitat to your WiFi router (they should not be near each other as they will interfere due to the frequencies in use), how close are your z-wave hubs to each other, etc.
Are all devices the kind that are plugged into electricity? I've discovered with some battery-operated devices that they sleep a lot to conserve battery and that delays actions. My iblind controllers are a perfect example: sending a refresh first and then the command seems to make them much happier regarding responding to commands.
As @toggledbits noted in a response to me previously in the thread (and you've supported), the mesh plays a huge role, too.
I had a Veralite and then moved to a VeraSecure. I've done direct comparisons between my VeraSecure and Hubitat using MSR to trigger the rules and the Hubitat was much faster. That, amongst other reasons, is why my VeraSecure is now completely offline.
Hubitat C-7 2.3.3.122 Home Assistant 2022.9.6, MSR on RPi4 bare metal Model B 2GBs latest-22264-93bf3814
-
@wmarcolin said in [Solved] Is there a cap or max number of devices a Global Reaction should not exceed?:
Looking at the log, I don't understand what sequence the MSR performed, but I see that all of the above actions were sent to Hubitat
Hmmm. I can't answer for the Hubitat part, but I explain the order. The first three actions in nGarden<SET> are Run Reaction, so these enqueue those reactions with the executive -- they are not run in-line. That's why you see the three "Enqueueing" lines, followed by a resume of nGarden<Set> from step 4. We see the action output for device 298, which is step 3 (numbered from 0), before the enqueue messages because enqueueing itself is an asynchronous operation, so the executive quickly started the three Run Reaction enqueue requests, then ran the device 298 Entity Action. Running an entity action is asynchronous, so the executive had to wait for that operation to finish. Since it went into a wait state, the tasks for the three Run Reaction enqueues could run, so they did. When they were done and the 298 device action was finished sending, nGarden<SET> could then resume from step 4 (numbered from 0, so 5 as we look at it). That's device 296 so we see that on the next line. Again, device actions have to wait for the send, so execution paused of nGarden<Set> paused there, which allowed nLight Garden ON, the first of the three enqueued reactions, to start and send its first command to device 97. That blocked that reaction, so nLight Security ON was next in the queue and it started and sent its first device action to 197. That blocked that reaction, so nLight Corredor Evening started and ran its first action against 419. It blocked, of course, so everything paused about 70ms until nGarden<Set> became the first ready task, so it resumed at step 5 (from 0, or 6 as we count from 1). And so on, until all were sent.
I'm not sure what your pacing configuration was at this point, but overall it appears about right for the number of tasks sent. It's hard to tell without more debug on, and maybe I'll add some "standard" messages about device queueing while we're looking at this (since debug on a Controller instance can be very large and a bit like sipping from a firehouse).
One thing to note also is that each Entity Action blocks while sending -- the reaction waits for the hub to acknowledge the request. For that to happen, the request must be sent, and the hub has to give an HTTP 200 (OK) response to the request (if it gives an error, that would be logged, and there are no errors logged in this snippet). So at the least, the hub has acknowledged the request, but that doesn't mean it has completed the request, let alone that the request was successful in its overall execution (e.g. manipulating the device). That's a different and much bigger problem.
I'm not done looking at this. I want to study the timing more carefully as well. There's something about it that doesn't seem right to me. As I said, I'm going to add some more standard (non-debug) diagnostic output to this while we're looking at it, and roll a new release later today, for you to try and send me new logs.
Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.
