Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] Logic review: Arm for xmas season lighting
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] Logic review: Arm for xmas season lighting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
10 Posts 3 Posters 741 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1

    I brought this over from Reactor for Vera back in the day. It's worked flawlessly, arming the lights for the xmas season which the various lighting rulesets point to. First night is the Friday after Thanksgiving and the last night is 01/07 as it covers the Russian Orthodox holiday.

    This year, it stopped running at exactly midnight on 01/01.

    ed10a6bd-2904-496d-91d2-19684f353ccd-image.png

    Anything stand out in my logic that I've missed?

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HASS 2025.11.1
    w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G gwp1

      I brought this over from Reactor for Vera back in the day. It's worked flawlessly, arming the lights for the xmas season which the various lighting rulesets point to. First night is the Friday after Thanksgiving and the last night is 01/07 as it covers the Russian Orthodox holiday.

      This year, it stopped running at exactly midnight on 01/01.

      ed10a6bd-2904-496d-91d2-19684f353ccd-image.png

      Anything stand out in my logic that I've missed?

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Alan_F
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @gwp1

      I played around with the from/to specific dates and it looks like you have two choices...

      Option 1: break it into two rules connected with an OR... rule 1: "After Nov 1st any year" and rule 2: "before Jan 7th any year". Or

      Option 2: add specific years... "From Nov 1st 2021 to January 7th 2022" works as you want it to.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Given the fact that it stopped running at exactly 01/01 midnight makes me wonder if there's a difference between MSR and RFV that isn't handling the crossover between years. Random guess - as I noted, this worked flawlessly (mostly because @toggledbits helped me thru the logic in RFV as I was very new to it) and was simply imported into MSR from Vera.

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HASS 2025.11.1
        w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          It's a bug in MSR. One extra check missing from the implementation on MSR. MSR and RFV necessarily implement the date comparisons very differently (although the valid expectation is that there should be no difference in the result). I thought I had all the edges tested, but I guess I missed a case. I opened PR 0000287 for it. I'll have it fixed later today. Still working on a requested item that I want to get out as well.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          G 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            It's a bug in MSR. One extra check missing from the implementation on MSR. MSR and RFV necessarily implement the date comparisons very differently (although the valid expectation is that there should be no difference in the result). I thought I had all the edges tested, but I guess I missed a case. I opened PR 0000287 for it. I'll have it fixed later today. Still working on a requested item that I want to get out as well.

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits Thank you for leaving my sanity intact on this first day of the shiny new year lol

            You also forced a test of the "Arm For" logic for non-holiday lighting as there'd been no non-holiday window of time since I'd corrected/updated it. So... #win?

            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HASS 2025.11.1
            w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
            MQTTController: 25139
            ZWave Controller: 25139

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              It's a bug in MSR. One extra check missing from the implementation on MSR. MSR and RFV necessarily implement the date comparisons very differently (although the valid expectation is that there should be no difference in the result). I thought I had all the edges tested, but I guess I missed a case. I opened PR 0000287 for it. I'll have it fixed later today. Still working on a requested item that I want to get out as well.

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @toggledbits Loaded up - see what happens tonight!

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HASS 2025.11.1
              w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                #7

                Nothing will change at the rule level, because you have a latched condition that is no longer latched driving an AND group all the way to the top.

                The only way to change it would be to set the "test time" back to the fourth Thursday in November 2021 to get the latched condition latched again, and then remove the test time to resume normal operation. If you want to try that, here's how, but before you do, understand that I don't know what other automations you have and how they are set up, and what effect the test time may have on those other automations. Again, it's home automation, not nuclear launch codes, so I suspect the worst will be some lights coming on when you don't expect, etc.

                1. Find the engine section of your Reactor.yaml file. If you don't have one, add it with the same indent level as baseurl as shown below:

                   baseurl: http://something:8111
                   engine:
                     enabled: true
                  
                2. Indented two spaces from the engine: line (i.e. the same as enabled), add a line test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm" and where I have put +hhmm put your current timezone offset from GMT. Note also that I've shown 08:00:00 for the time, but you can use any time of day that you think will have the least side-effects with other rules.

                   engine:
                     enabled: true
                     test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm"
                  
                3. Restart Reactor. The latched condition should go true and the rule should SET. You've basically time-warped the system backwards.

                4. After that's done, remove or comment out (with a '#') the test_time line, and restart Reactor again.

                5. Observe that the rule refreshes and should remain SET, with the latched group true and that last date/time condition (11/1 to 1/7) also still true (green).

                Also remember that I don't know what other rules that you have that may depend on this rule, so if there are date/time or sunrise/sunset rules that work in concert with this rule, they may not trigger unless the test time happens to also meet those rules. Just focus your attention on this one rule.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  Nothing will change at the rule level, because you have a latched condition that is no longer latched driving an AND group all the way to the top.

                  The only way to change it would be to set the "test time" back to the fourth Thursday in November 2021 to get the latched condition latched again, and then remove the test time to resume normal operation. If you want to try that, here's how, but before you do, understand that I don't know what other automations you have and how they are set up, and what effect the test time may have on those other automations. Again, it's home automation, not nuclear launch codes, so I suspect the worst will be some lights coming on when you don't expect, etc.

                  1. Find the engine section of your Reactor.yaml file. If you don't have one, add it with the same indent level as baseurl as shown below:

                     baseurl: http://something:8111
                     engine:
                       enabled: true
                    
                  2. Indented two spaces from the engine: line (i.e. the same as enabled), add a line test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm" and where I have put +hhmm put your current timezone offset from GMT. Note also that I've shown 08:00:00 for the time, but you can use any time of day that you think will have the least side-effects with other rules.

                     engine:
                       enabled: true
                       test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm"
                    
                  3. Restart Reactor. The latched condition should go true and the rule should SET. You've basically time-warped the system backwards.

                  4. After that's done, remove or comment out (with a '#') the test_time line, and restart Reactor again.

                  5. Observe that the rule refreshes and should remain SET, with the latched group true and that last date/time condition (11/1 to 1/7) also still true (green).

                  Also remember that I don't know what other rules that you have that may depend on this rule, so if there are date/time or sunrise/sunset rules that work in concert with this rule, they may not trigger unless the test time happens to also meet those rules. Just focus your attention on this one rule.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @toggledbits Seems like it has worked...

                  770af663-e77d-467e-bd38-cc511041d779-image.png

                  I also had a yellow warning about the system being in "test_time, not reality". But the true test came when I commented out the test_time line in reactor.yaml and restarted MSR and all the holiday lights came on.

                  The Russian Orthodox will have their Christmas lol

                  Thanks very much for this tool/tip - definitely will keep this around. And thank you for the really prompt fix on the bug, sir. I joke about the lights but it really wouldn't have ended the world if my lights were done for the season.

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HASS 2025.11.1
                  w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Apologies for interfering with tradition and observance! 🙂 I'm glad the test trick worked out, and indeed, it can be very handy. I'll make a note to add that to the Troubleshooting section of the docs as well.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      Apologies for interfering with tradition and observance! 🙂 I'm glad the test trick worked out, and indeed, it can be very handy. I'll make a note to add that to the Troubleshooting section of the docs as well.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @toggledbits Just confirmation that this all did do what it was to do: I was still in my office and watched the xmas lights do their thing!

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HASS 2025.11.1
                      w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Recent Topics

                      • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                        CrilleC
                        Crille
                        0
                        3
                        10

                      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        5
                        129
                        73.2k

                      • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        1
                        1
                        34

                      • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                        M
                        mgvra
                        1
                        3
                        97

                      • Script action and custom timers
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        4
                        111

                      • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                        CatmanV2C
                        CatmanV2
                        0
                        12
                        302

                      • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                        akbooerA
                        akbooer
                        1
                        2
                        100

                      • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                        CrilleC
                        Crille
                        0
                        6
                        121

                      • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        17
                        368

                      • Shelly Wall Display XL
                        akbooerA
                        akbooer
                        2
                        9
                        742

                      • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        26
                        664

                      • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                        CrilleC
                        Crille
                        0
                        12
                        429
                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Unsolved