Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Using duration of a rule or trigger in an expression
Reverse proxy & API ACL
tunnusT
I'm trying to allow anonymous access from a local network to /api/v1/log, but the problem now with the reverse proxy configuration is that this access is open via proxy to the internet. At least I wasn't able to configure ACL so that only an access from a local network would be permitted. reactor.yaml: baseurl: "http://192.168.1.12:8111" proxy_baseurl: "https://external.com:30000" trusted_proxy: "192.168.1.12" Local traffic would originate from 192.168.1.0/24 network. Synology is acting as a reverse proxy and hosting MSR as a docker container (which has its own network and IP 172.18.0.5). MSR build is latest-26298-fbb75fb8 users.yaml: - url: "/api/v1/log" method: "GET" source_ip: 172.18.0.0/24 allow: true Using the above ACL works, but it enables access via proxy also. If I use source_ip: 192.168.1.0/24, then it doesn't work either locally or remotely. So I'm kinda lost what should I use as source_ip in this case?
Multi-System Reactor
Grouped devices
G
I've seen many of you using Dynamic Group Controller. I'm using it myself for monitoring device battery levels. I've read and re-read the Dynamic Group Controller docs and still cannot come to an answer for my question so let me paint my scenario: I've migrated from EchoSpeaks in Hubitat ('cause borked and seemingly unmaintained) to Alexa Devices in Home Assistant ('cause not borked in 2026.11.0) to be able to send TTS to my Echo devices. In EchoSpeaks I could create groups. Sweet. In Alexa Devices I don't seem to be able to do so. As such, my thought was "wait - isn't there a way in MSR?" Is this an effective scenario that Dynamic Group Controller can be used for?
Multi-System Reactor
MFA
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Login protections
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Inspect - a small read-only helper panel for MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Build 26284 stuck at Loading Reactor UI
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
MSR with reverse proxy
tunnusT
I'm trying to use MSR via reserve proxy in Synology DSM, but MSR page does not load https://<public ip>:30000/reactor/en-US/ At the same time logging page loads normally https://<public ip>:30000/api/v1/log I thought maybe authentication was messing it up, but there was no deny entries in the log, and also disabling authentication did not make any difference. For this use case VPN is not an option (that works, but as said not an option for this particular use case). Any ideas what could cause this? MSR build latest-26242-28d69aa8, Chrome browser
Multi-System Reactor
Missing attribute after upgrade
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Native fan capabilty
therealdbT
Nothing more to add. I see we have hvac_blower, but, anyway, maybe a native fan on the same assumptions of the fan from HASS could be reasonable. I have a couple of them. ie, this is from ESPHome via HASS. x_hass.domain="fan" x_hass.entity_id="fan.kitchen_seashell_hood_ventilation_fan" x_hass.floor_id=null x_hass.services=["fan","esphome"] x_hass.source="esphome" x_hass.state="off" x_hass_attr.friendly_name="Seashell Hood Ventilation Fan" x_hass_attr.percentage=50 x_hass_attr.percentage_step=25 x_hass_attr.preset_mode="" x_hass_attr.preset_modes=[] x_hass_attr.supported_features=49 Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Rule do not fire
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Using duration of a rule or trigger in an expression

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
5 Posts 3 Posters 1.2k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    d868
    wrote on last edited by d868
    #1

    Hi, I have a rule that I have been using in the Vera version of Reactor for a number of years and I am trying to recreate it in MSR and need some advice. The rule monitors the state of our garage door and sends a regular alert if the door has been open for a period of time. The alert contains a variable/expression that provides the duration in minutes the door has been open - eg the end notification looks like this: "The door has been open for X minutes"

    I have everything working OK in MSR except for constructing the expression to provide the duration the door has been open. In Reactor I was using the 'getstate' function in an expression to get the runtime of the rule and then converting that to minutes and passing it to the notify action.

    In MSR I can't work out how to get any info from a rule within an expression.

    The trigger is a simple pulse every X minutes so I was hoping it would be possible to just get the duration of either the rule or the time the door has been open. In the documentation there is a lot of info on getting details of entities, but I couldn't find anything on getting the status of the rules within MSR as it doesn't look like they show up as entities? I hope I didn't miss that part of the doco.

    I did a bit of searching but couldn't find any discussion on getting this type of info so I'm hoping someone will be able to point me in the right direction.

    I'm using build 22179 on Docker and the devices are currently in Vera but I am likely to move them to HASS at some point.

    wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D d868

      Hi, I have a rule that I have been using in the Vera version of Reactor for a number of years and I am trying to recreate it in MSR and need some advice. The rule monitors the state of our garage door and sends a regular alert if the door has been open for a period of time. The alert contains a variable/expression that provides the duration in minutes the door has been open - eg the end notification looks like this: "The door has been open for X minutes"

      I have everything working OK in MSR except for constructing the expression to provide the duration the door has been open. In Reactor I was using the 'getstate' function in an expression to get the runtime of the rule and then converting that to minutes and passing it to the notify action.

      In MSR I can't work out how to get any info from a rule within an expression.

      The trigger is a simple pulse every X minutes so I was hoping it would be possible to just get the duration of either the rule or the time the door has been open. In the documentation there is a lot of info on getting details of entities, but I couldn't find anything on getting the status of the rules within MSR as it doesn't look like they show up as entities? I hope I didn't miss that part of the doco.

      I did a bit of searching but couldn't find any discussion on getting this type of info so I'm hoping someone will be able to point me in the right direction.

      I'm using build 22179 on Docker and the devices are currently in Vera but I am likely to move them to HASS at some point.

      wmarcolinW Offline
      wmarcolinW Offline
      wmarcolin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @d868 said in Using duration of a rule or trigger in an expression:

      The door has been open for

      Well, if I understand the scenario correctly, I imagine that you must have some sensor that indicates when the door is opened, a contact sensor.

      I would put a rule that when this sensor is {true}, door open, I would save in a global variable:

      Set Variable varOPEN = ${{ [time(),0,0,0] }}

      Then when the alert is executed from time to time, update the variable with the:

      Set Variable varOPEN = ${{[varOPEN[0], floor((time()-varOPEN[0])/86400000), floor(((time()-varOPEN[0]) % 86400000)/3600000), floor(((time()-varOPEN[0]) % 3600000)/60000)] }}

      And you would get the message like this:

      ${{ format( "The door has been open for: {}d {}h {}m", varOPEN[1], varOPEN[2], varOPEN[3]) }}

      varOPEN would be an array, which in the first position has the date and time when the door was opened, then in the other positions I put days, hours and minutes.

      I hope I have helped.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Some good ideas here. Some thoughts... pardon my brevity, still on vacation with very poor Internet.

        1. Use a local variable in the rule, not global
        2. Store just time() directly there's no need for a complicated array and the complicated expressions needed to set and manage it.
        3. In the Set reaction for the rule, use a repeat group with a delay inside to send the alert.
        4. Make sure the Reset reaction contains at least one action (a comment is enough) to ensure that the Set reaction is stopped when the door is closed.
        5. Use strftime() to format the time saved in the local variable. Simple math subtracting the saved time from the current time will give you the duration of open.

        Back to my regular keyboard in a couple of days

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          Some good ideas here. Some thoughts... pardon my brevity, still on vacation with very poor Internet.

          1. Use a local variable in the rule, not global
          2. Store just time() directly there's no need for a complicated array and the complicated expressions needed to set and manage it.
          3. In the Set reaction for the rule, use a repeat group with a delay inside to send the alert.
          4. Make sure the Reset reaction contains at least one action (a comment is enough) to ensure that the Set reaction is stopped when the door is closed.
          5. Use strftime() to format the time saved in the local variable. Simple math subtracting the saved time from the current time will give you the duration of open.

          Back to my regular keyboard in a couple of days

          wmarcolinW Offline
          wmarcolinW Offline
          wmarcolin
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @toggledbits YOU ARE ON VACATION! Forget the community 🙂

          4ca1b208-ef0d-4919-8736-047fbb0b6dcb-image.png

          As always, great commentary.

          I copied something that I am already using, and I ended up using a verifiable global because I use the information in several rules, so by the global, I can share the values.

          Use an array because the rules I mention are triggered by intervals, like 20 days, or 12 hours. So I have a routine that every 33 minutes updates several variables that I have in the system, like their times, and then the action can happen by validating what is in the array.

          Now, if it is for single control, it is possible to make things simpler and more direct as you mention.

          Thanks.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Offline
            D Offline
            d868
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Thanks for the replies. I assumed that I would have to go about it a different way that what I was doing on the Vera with Reactor.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            Recent Topics

            • Reverse proxy & API ACL
              tunnusT
              tunnus
              0
              3
              26

            • Grouped devices
              G
              gwp1
              0
              1
              14

            • MFA
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              17
              316

            • Login protections
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              2
              108

            • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              5
              152
              151.0k

            • Reactor Inspect - a small read-only helper panel for MSR
              G
              gwp1
              2
              6
              359

            • Reactor Build 26284 stuck at Loading Reactor UI
              T
              tamorgen
              0
              16
              1.4k

            • MSR with reverse proxy
              tunnusT
              tunnus
              0
              12
              702

            • Missing attribute after upgrade
              3
              3rdStng
              0
              3
              410

            • Use of Google Gemini as an MSR and Hubitat configuration aid
              therealdbT
              therealdb
              0
              2
              235

            • [MSR] Native fan capabilty
              therealdbT
              therealdb
              1
              3
              241

            • [MSR] Rule do not fire
              therealdbT
              therealdb
              0
              4
              341
            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
            Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Unsolved