Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
S

SweetGenius

@SweetGenius
Home Assistant Connect ZWA-2 & ZBT-2
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Hardware
Date/time condition
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Is there a way to turn this section (image in post) off?
toggledbitsT
Topic thumbnail image
Comments & Feedback
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
CrilleC
Just throwing out a general hint to the people running Homebridge and MQTT. Homebridge MQTT-Thing hasn't been updated in almost 2 years and it falls behind on compatibility with the development of Homebridge. I was looking for a replacement and found Homebridge Easy MQTT and I think it's a good replacement for MQTT-Thing. I particularly find Easy MQTT Value tranformers easier to to understand and use compared to MQTT-Thing Apply function. It took a while to migrate everything but I'm pleased and can recommend.
Software
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
Shelly Wall Display XL
therealdbT
I don't know if you guys are into dashboards, but I am. For a second home I tried the Shelly Wall Display 2, and while not so big, it worked well over the summer. Since we're remodeling our house, I just swapped my old Fire Tablet (with its own problems) with two new Shelly Wall Display XL. I just removed the standard firmware, and I added mine (https://github.com/dbochicchio/ShellyElevate), forked from https://github.com/RapierXbox/ShellyElevate I just managed to support buttons (this thing has 4 of them) and it's all auto-discovered by Home Assistant and accessible via Reactor. I also have a new build in the works with support for buttons inside HA. I added a bonus Javascript interface sending events (screen/screensaver status, buttons, motion) to automatically drive the dashboard (all doing in HTML+Javascript and monitoring Reactor's variable). This specifical thing excluded, go get one of them, the device has a decent CPU for HA dashboards and blends wonderfully in the decor.
Hardware
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
About
Posts
90
Topics
21
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
1

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • [Solved] Runtime error when exiting global reaction that contains a group
    S SweetGenius

    Fixed in Reactor build 25067.
    Thank You!

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Runtime error when exiting global reaction that contains a group
    S SweetGenius

    No hurry sir, Just reporting.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Runtime error when exiting global reaction that contains a group
    S SweetGenius

    I am getting a Runtime error on different browsers when I click exit when editing an existing or creating a new global reaction containing a group. If the global reaction does not have a group I don't get an error. I see a similar post on the forum about a Runtime Error when creating reactions but started a new thread as that appears to be solved.

    The Runtime Error is different in the two browsers
    Safari v18.3

    @http://192.168.10.21:8111/reactor/en-US/lib/js/reaction-list.js:171:44
    
    You may report this error, but do not screen shot it. Copy-paste the complete text. Remember to include a description of the operation you were performing in as much detail as possible. Report using the Reactor Bug Tracker (in your left navigation) or at the SmartHome Community.
    

    Google Chrome 133.0.6943.142

    TypeError: self.editor.isModified is not a function
        at HTMLButtonElement.<anonymous> (http://192.168.10.21:8111/reactor/en-US/lib/js/reaction-list.js:171:34)
    
    You may report this error, but do not screen shot it. Copy-paste the complete text. Remember to include a description of the operation you were performing in as much detail as possible. Report using the Reactor Bug Tracker (in your left navigation) or at the SmartHome Community.
    

    Steps to reproduce:
    Click the pencil to edit a global reaction with a group.
    Click the Exit button.
    Runtime error appears.
    or
    Click Create Reaction
    Click Add Action
    Select Group
    Add Condition such as Entity Attribute.
    Add an Action.
    Click Save
    Click Exit
    Runtime error appears.

    I don’t know how long the error has been there as I haven’t edited the global reaction in a long time.

    Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25060-f32eaa46
    Docker
    Mac OS: 15.3.1
    Thanks

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Any interest in a Homebridge adapter for Reactor?
    S SweetGenius

    Yes, I would be interested.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Have reactor shut off a light with no motion unless I turned it on manually
    S SweetGenius

    @sethlampman I use multiple rules and a global expression to hold the current state of the light that I set when different events happen. When motion triggers the light I set the global expression to “auto”. When the light comes on with no motion then it must of been turned on manually so that rule sets the expression to “man” I then have rules to to shut the light off for when motion happend and another rule for when it was turned on manually with different delays. When the light is off I set the global expression to idle. Does this give you any ideas for your situation?
    Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 7.07.05 PM.png Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 7.07.31 PM.png Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 7.07.58 PM.png Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 7.08.21 PM.png Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 7.10.59 PM.png

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Home Assistant push notification for Reactor version update possible?
    S SweetGenius

    @tamorgen If I understand what you are asking correctly, Look under the reactor_system for reactor_system.update_available=true and use that as a rule trigger to send a notification.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Hubitat Hub Information Driver v3 and probe device
    S SweetGenius

    Installation of Reactor build 23049 and configuring a virtual switch as a probe device appears to be working well.
    FYI, The "Manual" link in the Reactor UI doesn't have the updated docs that are linked to in the Release notes thread. Hubitat Controller, Other Configuration, probe_device section. I have tried a hard reset in safari and Firefox browsers but the documentation is not the updated instructions. Thank You.
    Synology Docker
    latest-23049

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Hubitat Hub Information Driver v3 and probe device
    S SweetGenius

    With all due respect and I do mean that and without beating this to death, I am only seeing the attributes that update when MSR probes are the baseData attributes witch per the Hub information driver’s documentation are (attributes: firmwareVersionString, hardwareID, id, latitude, localIP, localSrvPortTCP, locationId, locationName, longitude, name, temperatureScale, timeZone, type, uptime, zigbeeChannel, zigbeeEui, zigbeeId, zigbeeStatus, zipCode). I can find these attributes updating in the logs every time. Some examples of attributes that are not updating are publicIP and hubUpdateVersion among others. I use those attributes in rules and they do not update. I can not find evidence of these being updated in the logs or driver unless you set the poll time for these to very fast interval as I tried to document in the previous post. I do believe the next scheduled poll time is accurate and the attributes associated with the polls will not update until that time. Probably the best thing to do is to revert to the v2 driver.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Hubitat Hub Information Driver v3 and probe device
    S SweetGenius

    It looks like when MSR probes the device, it then resets the next scheduled poll times to the time of the probe + whatever time you have set to poll in the device preferences. If you have small poll times then the polls might fire between MSR polls. Here is the filtered Hubitat log showing which polls run. lastPoll: baseData is when MSR does the probe. The first part of the log is with the poll:1 time is set at 9 minutes. If the time elapsed since a MSR probe > than 9 minutes then the poll:1 will run. It ran once at 06:45:15. I then changed the poll1 time from 9 mins to 3 mins at 8:00pm to test. You can see it ran more often but I don't know why the baseData slowed way down also.

    dev:4812023-02-13 08:39:50.352 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:37:48.478 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:34:48.349 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:31:48.207 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:28:48.062 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:25:48.076 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:23:46.117 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:20:45.974 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:17:45.811 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:14:45.676 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:11:45.509 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:08:45.408 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:05:45.460 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:03:43.698 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 08:00:43.644 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:56:18.977 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:54:17.207 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:50:52.589 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:44:17.322 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:39:17.057 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:36:18.474 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:34:16.720 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:26:27.444 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:24:16.188 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:21:27.225 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:14:58.542 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:09:15.465 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:04:15.275 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 07:01:16.758 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 06:59:14.981 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 06:54:14.847 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 06:45:15.886 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    dev:4812023-02-13 06:36:15.792 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 06:34:14.031 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 06:29:52.364 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 06:26:15.479 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 06:24:13.706 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
    dev:4812023-02-13 06:19:41.211 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
    

    I am not looking for an immediate fix or change, Just trying to communicate to you what I am seeing.

    Would it be an option to write your own virtual device driver for Hubitat so you could probe that device and return the data you want for the health check?

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Hubitat Hub Information Driver v3 and probe device
    S SweetGenius

    I am running the latest version of the driver: v3.0.14.
    It appears to me when MSR probes the device or if you press configure in the driver, all the new scheduled poll times increase causing them never to run. I have my poll times set as follows: poll1: 9 mins, poll2: 119 mins, poll3: 241 mins, poll4: 12 hours.
    Screen Shot 2023-02-12 at 2.31.24 PM.png Here is a screenshot showing the scheduled poll times to start:
    Screen Shot 2023-02-12 at 2.29.39 PM.png

    After MSR polls the scheduled poll times:
    Screen Shot 2023-02-12 at 2.40.38 PM.png

    Poll3 and poll2 are not running.
    Here is what I'm polling in the driver.
    Screen Shot 2023-02-12 at 3.13.54 PM.png

    I know this is not your driver but I'm encouraged if you are not seeing a problem. I must have something configured wrong. Would you mind checking your driver and see if your scheduled times increase also?

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Hubitat Hub Information Driver v3 and probe device
    S SweetGenius

    I have upgraded my Hubitat Hub Information Driver to v3 and after the latest MSR update latest-23028 MSR is working ok. The problem is when MSR probes the device it appears to affect the polling in the new Hub Information Device and its data does not update the data fields in Hubitat. If I remove the Hub Information Device from Maker API so MSR can't see it, The Hub information driver updates the data as expected in Hubitat. I added the device back into Maker API the same problem returns in Hubitat. I have tried to have MSR probe a different device by adding a different probe device and probe action in the reactor.yaml per the documentation but it appears then it still uses the Hub Information Device as the probe device instead of the one specified in the reactor.yaml. See Logs below. Is this the intended behavior to always use the Hub Information Driver if found and not use the device in the reactor.yaml file? Any recommendations on how to get MSR and the v3 of the driver to work correctly or can you see what I am doing wrong?

    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.471Z <Controller:NOTICE> Controller HassController#hass is now online.
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.471Z <Rule:INFO> Internet Check (rule-l44qss4f in Home) starting evaluation; because entity-changed System#reactor_system>system
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.471Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Version Available (rule-labweim2 in Notify) starting evaluation; because entity-changed System#reactor_system>system
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> Internet Check (rule-l44qss4f in Home) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> Internet Check (rule-l44qss4f in Home) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Version Available (rule-labweim2 in Notify) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Version Available (rule-labweim2 in Notify) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> Internet Check (rule-l44qss4f in Home) evaluation complete
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Version Available (rule-labweim2 in Notify) evaluation complete
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.673Z <HubitatController:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat Maker API responded with 91 devices
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.766Z <HubitatController:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat found 'Hub Information Driver v3' device #"481"; using for probe/health checks.
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.780Z <Controller:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.780Z <Rule:INFO> Roku Pause (rule-l3nlrzu9 in Home) starting evaluation; because entity-changed BinarySensor#hubitat>519
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.780Z <Rule:INFO> Stairs Light Low Light (rule-kulslls9 in Living Room) starting evaluation; because entity-changed BinarySensor#hubitat>519
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.780Z <Rule:INFO> Porch Motion Extended check (rule-l3kr45m8 in Porch) starting evaluation; because entity-changed BinarySensor#hubitat>519
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.780Z <Rule:INFO> Porch Light Manual On (rule-kmtxw155 in Porch) starting evaluation; because entity-changed BinarySensor#hubitat>519
    

    Snippet from the reactor.yaml:

     # action_pace: 100
          # warn_unresponsive: true
          # probe_device: hubitat>132 (not needed if Hub Information app installed)
          probe_device: hubitat>2
          # probe_action: x_hubitat_Configuration.configure (not needed if Hub Information app installed)
          probe_action: x_hubitat_Configuration.configure
          # probe_action: x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh
    

    Synology Docker latest-23028
    Hubitat v2.3.4.139
    Hub Information Driver v3

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Resolved] Determining if button is pushed
    S SweetGenius

    @3rdStng I do not have the same device but I had to overcome this with my minimotes. Have you tried to set the x_hubitat_pushableButton.push back to 0 after your intended reaction. I cannot post images either for some reason or I would post an image of my Rule.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Quality of Life Request: Update Button
    S SweetGenius

    I personally do not think the update process on Synology docker is that bad. A few more clicks than an easy button but not horrible. All my other docker containers are updated the same way. I like the docker image though. I am not familiar with the other platforms so I can’t comment on those update processes.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Extras Filename/versions do not match
    S SweetGenius

    In the download/extras folder, there appears to be new versions but after installing them the versions do not match file version.
    Installed MQTTController-22291 => Logs report version 22284
    Installed NUTTController-22291 => Logs report version 22283
    Installed ZwaveJSController-22291 => Logs report version 22283

    The CHANGELOG.MD file in the archives shows the log reported version not 22291.
    Is this intended ? Just wanted to make sure I have the latest versions.
    Thanks

    Synology Docker latest-22293

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Deleting widgets
    S SweetGenius

    @tunnus Drag the widget off to the left side and it will disappear.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Feature Request: Widget for Condition sustained time
    S SweetGenius

    I would like to ask if this is possible and if others would find this useful.
    I have multiple rules that check if lights are turned on manually and then have “Condition must be sustained for” xxxx amount of seconds then use the set reaction to turn off the light if it has not been shutoff. I like the UI when the rule is expanded that shows sustained time. (See Screenshot Below) Could a “Widget” have this information on the status screen that would show which rules conditions are waiting to come true with the sustained time? Similar to the Running Reactions widget.
    Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 7.44.09 PM.png Thanks
    latest-22274
    Synology Docker

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Mosquitto and Owntracks
    S SweetGenius

    @catmanv2 said in Mosquitto and Owntracks:

    Does the indenting really matter?

    Yes, indenting matters, like @therealdb said previously.
    Is port 8883 the correct port for your setup?

    Software

  • Mosquitto and Owntracks
    S SweetGenius

    @catmanv2 I am no expert but try this:
    Change user: to username: Also, I believe both username: and password: should be the same indenting as source.

    Software
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved