Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
toggledbitsT

toggledbits

@toggledbits
[Solved] Rulesets with multiple groups in Set Reaction not working post-26116
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor build 26116: empty group reaction
therealdbT
I have a couple of rules that has group reactions with empty conditions. I notice, in particular on one that's called every 5 secs, that it was not working. I added an empty comment as condition and it started working again. I don't know if saving was enough to "reset" it, but I'm reporting anyway. No errors in the logs, but the MQTT message was not published, so I had an easy path to check the rule. I have others like these, but not easy to test. @toggledbits maybe some stuck status data? (I restarted a couple of times after the last update). Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Temperature control with TRVs
CatmanV2C
Morning lovely people. Having just had some new rads put in, I dumped the old TRVs for snacky enw Zigbee ones, which work great. Currently my gas boiler has a Horstman Z-wave relay bound to a remote thermostat so only comes on depending on when the thermostat puts out a call for heat Has anyone else got all their rads on TRVs and if so, how are you managing boiler control? I'm thinking about using a Reaction that effectively says 'If any TRV is 'on', turn the boiler on by raising the setpoint on the thermostat' and vice versa. Currently this isn't great as we have two rads (one in the kitchen (which has underfloor heating) and in the hall, (where the remote thermostat is) which don't have TRVs. If I set the thermostat to 25 (say) when a rad calls for heat, those two rooms get roasting no matter what else is going on. So my thoughts are: Add TRVs to these two rads and all will be well. Is this a sensible approach, or is there a better way of doing it? Thanks, as ever! C
General Discussion
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Next Release?
CatmanV2C
Morning. Do we have a roadmap for the next release, at all? I only ask as there's a breaking HA change and I have many packages now out of date. Cheers! C
Multi-System Reactor
Controller Z-Wave JS UI: "Location" attribute not visible in Reactor entities
N
Hi, I'm on Docker/NAs (latest-26011-c621bbc7) with Zwave js ui (last version). I have set the 'Location' for each device in the Z-Wave JS UI dashboard, I cannot find this information among the Entity Attributes in the Reactor. I tried and the result is an empty array []. It seems the 'Location' metadata from Z-Wave JS is not being mapped to a standard attribute in Reactor. Location is equale to Rooms for me. When comparing this to the Vera or Ezlo Controller, Reactor automatically creates Room Icons also in the Reactor Dashboard and places the various devices under those room categories. This is a very convenient way to keep the dashboard organized and quickly find lights to turn off with a click (especially when something isn't switched off as expected for me:) ). Is there a way to map the Z-Wave JS UI 'Location' attribute and a dashboard organization, just like it does with Vera/Ezlo? Thanks in advance for all the great tips you've shared
Multi-System Reactor
Do you Matter?
akbooerA
Is anyone using the Matter protocol to connect devices?
General Discussion
Variables not updating properly
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Changes operator does not always detect change
tunnusT
I've had similar problems before, but now this issue has resurfaced. Using build 26011 on Docker. As I copied one old rule as a "template" for a similar new rule, where I have multiple conditions using changes operator (from any to any, and with delay reset of 900), these conditions do not detect change in attributes. Even if I manually reset the rule, reset delay timers do not restart. If I do a new rule from scratch, and do not copy/import anything old, the same conditions work properly. Also, if I modify copied rule's conditions (put a random number to "from" & "to" fields), then save, and after that remove those modifications, rule begins to function normally. Just editing e.g. delay reset value does not do any good in this context. @toggledbits, I can DM logs & related rule files to you, if you just send me instructions.
Multi-System Reactor
Dynamic MQTT topics and parameters
M
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Condition for trend
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Struggling to setup my first Tasmota device and MQTT
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Raspberry Pi 4 dual RAM variant introduced to mitigate RAM price increases
toggledbitsT
Article here that may be of interest to some: https://www.cnx-software.com/2026/02/05/raspberry-pi-4-dual-ram-variant-introduced-to-mitigate-ram-price-increases-and-supply-challenges/
SBC
Existing Rule stopped working HTTP command fetching IP address from website
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Set reaction triggering wrong z-wave device
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
cw-kidC
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC. Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc. Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box? Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
RPi Alternative: Orange Pi 4 LTS (3GB RAM/16GB eMMC)
toggledbitsT
The last of four boards I'm trying in this batch is the Orange Pi 4 LTS. I purchased a 3GB RAM + 16GB eMMC model from Amazon for $83, making it the most costly of the four boards tried, but still well under my US$100 limit. This board is powered by a Rockchip RK3399-T processor, ARM-compatible with dual Cortex-A72 cores and quad Cortex-A53 cores at 1.6Ghz (1.8Ghz for the 4GB model); compare this to the RPi 3B+ with four Cortex-A53 and the RPi 4B with four Cortex-A72, this board is a hybrid that I would expect to stand in the performance middle between the two RPi models. It's available in 3GB and 4GB DDR4 RAM configurations, with and without 16GB eMMC storage. It has a MicroSDHC slot, gigabit Ethernet, WiFi and BT, two USB 2.0 type A ports, one USB 3.0 type C port, a mini PCIe ribbon-cable connector (requires add-on board for standard connector), two each RPi-compatible camera and LCD ports, HDMI type A, and can be powered (5VDC/3A) via USB-C or DC type C (3.8mm OD/1.1mm ID) jack (center-positive), an odd and perhaps unwelcome departure from the more common type A (5.5mm/2.1mm). A serial port for console/debug can be connected by using a (not included) USB-TTL adapter (3.3V) via pin headers like the Orange Pi Zero 2. The included dual-band antenna connects via U.FL connector to the board, so it's easy substituting for another if you prefer. The manufacturer recommends use of a heat sink (which was included in the box). A metal cooling case is also offered by the manufacturer (a bundle with the metal case and a power supply is sold on Amazon for $90 as of this writing). The Orange Pi 4 LTS is somewhat longer than the RPi 4B, and although the boards are the same width, the mounting hole placement is different both in length and (oddly) width. Between this and the differences in connector locations, neither board is a drop-in replacecment for the other and their respective cases are not interchangeable. The 26-pin header is a subset of the RPi 4B's 40-pin header, so some HATs for the RPi may work (although the mounting hole differences will make securing them "interesting"), and some HATs will surely not. Models with eMMC storage have an OS installed and boot immediately with SSH daemon running and ready for login. Mine was running Debian Bullseye, which would probably be fine for most users. It had clearly been on there a while, because it needed a lot of updates, but it's a current distro, so you're running out of the box with something that will last. A different OS can be installed by downloading an image (once again I chose Ubuntu Jammy) and writing it to a MicroSD card, then booting the system from the SD card. You can either leave the system in that state (running the OS from the SD card), or copy the OS from the SD card to the eMMC. The latter is done by a script; documentation for the process is best described in the downloadable PDF User Manual. This took about 10 minutes and went smoothly, and I was able to boot the system without the SD card after the process completed. I have lingering questions around the value of the eMMC storage. It's definitely faster than using MicroSD or USB-based storage (I got 311MB/s average on a 4GB write, compared to MicroSD performance around 15MB/s), but it would take a long-term test of this product to determine if the on-board eMMC option has the stamina to take the write counts typical of Linux systems, and if its wear-leveling and error correction are sufficient to assure a long, error-free life. Given the high premium apparently being paid for including eMMC on the board, it should be fast and durable, but only time and experience (perhaps painful) would tell the latter. A careful configuration with other Flash-friendly filesystems could be used to reduce wear, but this is an advanced configuration/cookbook topic and beyond the scope of this writing. This question is also not unique to eMMC — MicroSD cards are also known to fail with high write cycles, so the use of a "high endurance" product is recommended for any and all systems using MicroSD as primary storage. The board has Mini PCIe capability, and that may be a storage alternative, but read on... Also bear in mind that the eMMC storage is fixed-size forever; it cannot be expanded, and 16GB can run out pretty quickly these days. Users of MicroSD cards for primary storage can upgrade to bigger cards, but when users of eMMC primary storage outgrow it, the only choice is to add a MicroSD card or other "external" storage to the system, move part of the filesystem to it, and then manage both storage devices and deal with the limitations and risks of both. As I mentioned with the Orange Pi Zero 2, if you are going to use this board as a home automation controller/gateway or similar role, it should (IMO) have a battery-backed real time clock (RTC), and Orange Pi offers an add-on module that connects directly to the 26-pin header on the board. An available expansion board provides a standard Mini PCIe interface and SIM card slot (hmm...), but it connects to the main board via a short ribbon cable, and its mounting holes have no complement on the main board, so it seems like it would be a fragile dangly thing that's a nuisance to deal with. I want to like this board more, and it's very capable, but I'm concerned about value. The limited options for eMMC (16GB or none), the question mark of the eMMC's longevity vs cost, the strange DC power connector choice, the lack of 40-pin GPIO on a full-size (plus) board, the inconsistent hole placement, and the fragile Mini PCIe arrangement, are all "cons" that devalue this board in my view. The price point is clearly driven by the additional capabilities of the board (camera support, ports, six core CPU, extra RAM, on-board eMMC storage), but unfortunately, a great many of these features may not be useful for home automation, and therefore potentially a waste of money. In terms of overall value, I still believe the Libre "Le Potato" seems a better choice to me, and the Orange Pi Zero 2 (very) a close second, but I'll admit I'm focused on a particular application and your needs may be better suited to what this board offers than mine. Passmark Results: OrangePi 4 LTS Cortex-A72 (aarch64) 6 cores @ 1200 MHz | 2.9 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 6 | Test Iterations: 1 | Test Duration: Medium -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 583 Integer Math 12037 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 2542 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 4.5 Million Primes/s Sorting 3141 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 153 MB/s Compression 4049 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 154 Million Operations/s Physics 80.5 Frames/s Extended Instructions (NEON) 244 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 498 Database Operations 551 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 2524 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 2602 MB/s Memory Write 3182 MB/s Available RAM 1947 Megabytes Memory Latency 119 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 6243 MB/s --------------- eMMC storage write 311MB/s average for 4GB; MicroSD (Samsung 32GB class 10) storage write 15MB/s.
SBC
About
Posts
3.0k
Topics
47
Shares
0
Groups
1
Followers
18
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • [Solved] Rulesets with multiple groups in Set Reaction not working post-26116
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    That's great to hear! Sorry for the disruption! Onward!

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Rulesets with multiple groups in Set Reaction not working post-26116
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    @therealdb Yes!

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Rulesets with multiple groups in Set Reaction not working post-26116
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    @therealdb said in Rulesets with multiple groups in Set Reaction not working post-26116:

    PS: is it safe to delete the json files in the folder?

    Which folder?

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    Reactor build 26130

    • Reactions and Reactions UI: fix a long-standing issue where imported/cloned Group and While actions were not given unique IDs by the UI. Until 26116, this bug lurked in the shadows because IDs on actions in Reactions didn't matter at all, so the duplication went unnoticed and was actually harmless. But changes in 26116 to improve predicate response and display made these IDs important for Rule-based Reactions. IDs tend to change when Rule-based Reactions are edited, but long-standing objects that aren't often touched could be left with duplicate IDs embedded. In 26116, this duplication would cause inconsistent and incorrect evaluation of group/while predicates (because two different predicates sharing the same ID would share the same status/result). This build fixes the situation in two ways. First, existing Rules are fixed by deep-scanning when loaded (i.e. at startup), and any conditions or actions having duplicate IDs are given new, unique IDs. Second, fixes have been made to the Reaction Editor to prevent duplication of IDs when an action is cloned or a Reaction is imported. The former fix should ensure that your existing rules are corrected with no further intervention on your part. The latter fix addresses the original editing (copy and import) bugs that gave rise to the problem in the first place. Note that IDs are only required to be unique within the context of a Rule or Reaction; they do not need to be globally unique. If you are the type of person who likes to "deep dive" your storage data and you happen to find duplicate IDs in different Rules/Reactions, that's OK; it's only a problem if an ID is used in duplicate within a single Rule or Reaction. If you get an alert in the Status page that rules were modified by the new startup scan, please delete the alert and restart Reactor. The alert should not return (i.e. the rule is fixed). If the alert returns across more than two restarts, let me know in the Smarthome Community.
    • HassController: Bless HA to 2026.5.1
    Multi-System Reactor announcements

  • [Solved] Rulesets with multiple groups in Set Reaction not working post-26116
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    I dropped you a DM. Whatever folder you are uploading to has expired and I no longer have access to it.

    That may be moot at this point, since info from @therealdb is likely leading to the same conclusion. I have a fix build coming soon that I'm at least 50% sure will address your problem as well as his.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor build 26116: empty group reaction
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    OK. Please turn on log level 5 for that rule only. Run the rule to show the issue, and upload the entire Rule log file as well as reactor.log, the rule storage files (dval and json). Link for upload in your DMs

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor build 26116: empty group reaction
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    Build 26127 just posted has a small change that hit the issue responsible for the misbehavior. If not, there's additional logging that may help point me in the right direction.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Rulesets with multiple groups in Set Reaction not working post-26116
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    At this point I would need to see the entire config file. You could also run it through yamllint.com to make sure it's all OK (and remember, no tabs -- always spaces for indenting -- that's a common trap with some editors that "help" you during copy/paste).

    Build 26127 has a change that may be responsible for the misbehavior, as well as additional logging in case that's not the problem. Please upgrade to that when able and see how it behaves.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    Reactor build 26127

    • This is an interim build that has one small possible fix for the group evaluation problem reported by @gwp1 and @therealdb , as well as additional diagnostic logging in case that change doesn't resolve the issue. Other users not using or experiencing problems with Reaction groups do not need to update to this build.
    Multi-System Reactor announcements

  • [Solved] Rulesets with multiple groups in Set Reaction not working post-26116
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    Looks OK. Check your IDs if you are not getting logs. The files will be named Logger#Rule#<ruleid>.log.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Rulesets with multiple groups in Set Reaction not working post-26116
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    Enable logging at level 5 just for that rule. Anything else is going to generate too much information/distraction.

    Edit: I'm not finding any issues yet in focused testing on this. I obvious don't know what the dependent rules do in your conditions (what conditions they have), but basic functional tests of groups with true and false constraints are working fine for me.

    Since you have delays in your groups (or can easily add them), that's one way to slow things down so you can watch the "Running Reactions" status widget, which also may give us a clue why it's not working the way you expect.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Solved] Rulesets with multiple groups in Set Reaction not working post-26116
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    Again, if you're not posting 20 or more lines of logs around what you think is interesting, it's not enough. You're also not showing the conditions for this Rule (a Ruleset is a collection of Rules).

    It's suspicious to me that you have both Set and Reset reactions here... do you remember contra-reactions? If the rule is Set, the Set reaction starts running. While it's running, if the rule Resets and the Reset reaction is not empty, the Set reaction will be stopped (pre-empted) before the Reset reaction is started. The same is true the other way... the Reset reaction can be pre-empted by the rule Setting while the Reset reaction is running.

    This very much comes into play when the rule's conditions look at an entity that is also controlled by either reaction (i.e. condition to see if the light is off with a reaction that turns it on), and any condition that produces pulse output (i.e. by using pulse output in condition options, or using the changes operator in a condition). The former instantly changes the rule conditions and possibly the rule state. The latter (pulse) happens very fast when no reset delay is configured, and can easily pre-empt the Set reaction before it even has a chance to start.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor build 26116: empty group reaction
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    OK. 26120 rebuilt with a UI fix and pushed. Update your container and let me know how it goes.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor build 26116: empty group reaction
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    Ugh. So sorry. Working on it now.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor build 26116: empty group reaction
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    @gwp1 Logs probably long gone if you've already modified the reaction. It would help to see the group in its original form, though.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor build 26116: empty group reaction
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    @gwp1 unrelated.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor build 26116: empty group reaction
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    OK. Here's the release note I'm making on this for the next build:

    • The behavior of empty "group" conditions was changed in error. As of the next build, the behavior is as follows: group actions may have empty constraints (no conditions), and since this is not explicitly false, the group will be allowed to run; while actions may not have empty constraints (and this will be enforced by the UI/editor going forward), and if a legacy while action is encountered with no conditions, it will not execute (safe behavior). A disabled group or while action will not run.
    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    Reactor build 26116

    PLEASE READ ALL CAUTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS BELOW!

    IMPORTANT: PERSISTENT FORMAT STORAGE CHANGE! I STRONGLY RECOMMEND MAKING AN INTENTIONAL, SEPARATE BACKUP OF YOUR REACTOR STORAGE/DATA BEFORE UPGRADING TO THIS BUILD, AND SAVING IT SAFELY SOMEWHERE FOR A WHILE. The file format and name used to store Reactor system objects and data has changed as of this build. Data files under the storage directory now have a .dval suffix rather than .json. See this post for background. Conversion of your existing files to the new format is automatic and transparent on the first run of this and future builds, so your existing backups will be restorable into the foreseeable future. If you need to see the contents of a file in its native form, a new utility under tools has been provided: dval2json.js. You can run this utility (e.g. node tools/dval2json.js storage/expressions.dval) and it will read the .dval file and output its JSON representation, if possible. However, due to the limitations of standard JSON, some .dval files may not be convertible to JSON by this tool; if that happens, the tool will switch to an alternate output format that is JSON-like enough to be human-readable (but is not parseable as JSON).

    BARE-METAL UPGRADE MUST UPDATE DEPENDENCIES! Those of you on bare-metal installs will need to run npm run deps in your Reactor install directory after unpacking the distribution archive. There are new and updated packages required to run this build of Reactor, and it will not start without these updates. Docker users don't need to do anything, as the image is built with all dependencies preloaded.

    ERRORS WILL BE LOGGED ON THE FIRST RESTART AFTER UPGRADING TO THIS BUILD. ALLOW THE SYSTEM TO SETTLE A MINUTE, AND THEN RESTART AGAIN. THEN AND ONLY THEN SHOULD YOU BEGIN CHASING/REPORTING ANY ISSUES THAT REMAIN.

    • DynamicGroupController now manages rooms across all standard controllers where room information is available from the source hub. Previously, each Controller had to manage rooms on its own (if that data was available from the hub/source), and the room groups were local to that controller. Now, the room information on Vera, Ezlo, Home Assistant (area), Hubitat, and Z-Wave JS (location) will be used to automatically generate shared groups owned by DynamicGroupController. Rooms are associated by name (case insensitive); for example, a "Living Room" room on a Vera and a "Living Room" area in Home Assistant will both use the "Living Room" group automatically created and managed by DynamaicGroupController. This behavior can be turned off on a per-controller basis by setting rooms_as_sys_groups: false in a controller's configuration. By default, this setting is true (on, system-level groups will be created) for all controllers. All standard controllers (Home Assistant, Hubitat, Vera, Ezlo, and Z-Wave JS) have been updated to use the new room group strategy. Refer to the documentation for each Controller for additional details.
    • VeraController: Add configuration flag rooms_as_local_groups to enable VeraController's legacy behavior of creating local groups for Vera rooms. In support of the shared groups described above, this setting defaults to false as of this build. Existing local groups will be marked dead for eventual purging unless this setting is changed.
    • Expressions: new runReaction() function can be used to launch a Reaction (see docs);
    • Reactions UI: Additional fixes to coordination and placement for copy/move;
    • Reactions: While actions now have an optional iteration limit — a maximum number of times the loop will run. If the loop hits this limit before its conditions stop it, the loop will stop without error;
    • Reactions: While actions now have an enforced once-per-second minimum iteration delay (that is, if you omit a Delay action in the While group, Reactor will provide a one second delay);
    • Reactions UI: The display of the While condition on the detail card has been improved;
    • DynamicGroupController: new include_attribute selector (see docs);
    • Rules: The rule detail display now updates the main constraints' evaluation values continuously. This restores UI functionality lost when fixing an earlier bug that caused unexpected/undesirable re-evaluation of a Rule's triggers when dependent entities or variables in constraints were modified;
    • Controller Config: The type config key, previously deprecated, is no longer supported. Use implementation instead. Unless you've ignored prior deprecation warnings, this should not be an issue.
    • Rules: The startup scan of rule conditions has been improved to correctly update old conditions using the changes operator with blank operands;
    • HubitatController: The room of a device is now stored on the entity attributes.
    • HassController: The area and floor properties of a device/entity are now stored on the Reactor entity's attributes.
    • HassController: Better support for new "state" selector in service data as of 2026.4.0. The most notable effect is that, where HA offers us data, we will present a list of expected values for a field down to the device/entity level (because not every device may support every possible value for a field). This is not universal yet, but seems to be HA's direction, so as they publish the data on more entities, it should just start working in Reactor Editor fields.
    • Entities List: Fix page overflow when attribute has a long value with no natural word breaks (i.e. force wrap).
    • Entity: extended attribute values on standard capabilities will now survive refresh of the capability.
    • Reaction Editor: Fix presentation issue with gutter in section header.
    • Rule Editor: Fix presentation issues with gutters in section headers.
    • Reaction Editor: After a data entry validation error, an error was not being cleared after the user fixed the entry.
    • Dashboard: the sys_group.visible attribute has been added to control the selection of groups for automatic display on the Dashboard's default group list display (default: true);
    • Many documentation tweaks and updates; supply some new/improved images.
    • Docker images: Detection of improperly mounted data volume. This will help alert new users in particular to missing/misconfigured data volume binding.
    • HassController: Bless HA to 2026.4.3
    Multi-System Reactor announcements

  • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    OK, everyone, it's almost time. Sorry for the long pause. Life takes over sometimes.

    The aforementioned updates will be in the next build, and I am working on wrapping everything up to get that build out later this week.

    Please make backups of your Reactor data as advised in the head post here. As I said then/there, I've been working with this for months now, with no issues, but my world is not your world or everyone else's world, so there's always the possibility I don't see or have an issue that you do.

    Prior to releasing this new build in the latest channel, the 26011 build will become the stable channel head. In addition to your backups, that gives you a relatively quick path (especially docker users) to get back onto 26011 if there's a showstopper.

    This build will also include unified room groups: DynamicGroupController will manage "rooms" (or areas or locations or whatever your hub calls them). If you have two different hubs with devices in the "Living Room," there will be one "Living Room" group with the combined set of devices. The per-controller room groups generated by VeraController and EzloController will be disabled by default, and existing room groups created by these controllers will be marked as dead entities (and eventually purged). If you already use DynamicGroupController to manually create your own room groups via configuration, you can either keep that (and disable DGC's new behavior, if you wish) or switch to DGC's version. An updated version of ZWaveJSController that supports this functionality will be released simultaneously with the core build.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Next Release?
    toggledbitsT toggledbits

    OK. If it helps, I haven't had to make any compatiblity changes to HassController since HA 2026.1.0 up to 2026.4.0. They did change some service data information, but not in a way that's incompatible, rather, they improved the content of the data in a way that I have now modified both HassController and the UI to offer more guidance (suggested values) for parameters in some services. They are taking a new direction that I imagine provides better and more consistent support for themselves in Lovelace, and I'm following that path with them. So you can probably go to at least 2026.4 and, if you can tolerate Reactor warning you about it, may not have any issues, but again, I don't have every device/integration, so there's always something you may have that I don't and therefore don't see (but that's a risk whether I "bless" the HA release or not, and as you know, I try to react as quickly as possible when those things come up).

    TL;DR You can probably upgrade HA to 2026.4 safely, just ignore Reactor's warnings. If there's any issue, let me know and I'll address it.

    Multi-System Reactor
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved