@toggledbits ok, when I get back home I’ll try that. But wasn’t depth optional, i.e. defaults to 2 if not specified?
tunnus
Posts
-
Time series documentation -
Time series documentation@toggledbits those were already in my previous post, or was something missing?
-
Time series documentation@toggledbits this configuration has been running for hours (retention being 60 min), and still "null"
-
Time series documentation@toggledbits I cannot get "accel" (acceleration) method to work. It used to work at some point, but at least with the latest builds (now using 25328) I'm getting "null" as a value. Entity values below:
value_sensor.units=null value_sensor.value=null x_virtualentity.last_request_time=null x_virtualentity.request_failures=null x_virtualentity.template=null x_virtualentity.timeseries_aggregate="accel" x_virtualentity.timeseries_debug=[{"time":1766248080000,"value":694},{"time":1766248380000,"value":694},{"time":1766248680000,"value":694},{"time":1766248980000,"value":701},{"time":1766249280000,"value":701},{"time":1766249580000,"value":691},{"time":1766249880000,"value":691},{"time":1766250180000,"value":691},{"time":1766250480000,"value":696},{"time":1766250780000,"value":696},{"time":1766251080000,"value":696},{"time":1766251380000,"value":707},{"time":1766251680000,"value":707}] x_virtualentity.timeseries_depth=null x_virtualentity.timeseries_interval=5 x_virtualentity.timeseries_length=13 x_virtualentity.timeseries_nextsample=1766251980000 x_virtualentity.timeseries_retention=60And configuration from reactor.yaml:
id: virtual9 name: "Netatmo CO2 change rate" capabilities: value_sensor: attributes: value: model: time series entity: "hass>sensor_carbon_dioxide" attribute: "value_sensor.value" interval: 5 aggregate: accel retention: 60 precision: 2 primary_attribute: value_sensor.value type: ValueSensorWhen I tried to drop "retention" and used "depth" instead, got the following error:
Unable to configure time series "value_sensor.value" on "virtual9": missing required configuration 'retention' Controller: VirtualEntityController#virtual Last 15:56:17Looking at the entity values, there's "x_virtualentity.timeseries_depth=null", and if depth is needed in the calculation, that could be the culprit?
-
Time series documentationIs the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
-
Home Assistant Connect ZWA-2 & ZBT-2@therealdb I guess only C-8 pro supports z-wave JS
-
Home Assistant Connect ZWA-2 & ZBT-2@gwp1 I have C-8, but now considering to buy ZWA-2. I think it could speed up the migration if ZWA-2 is added as a secondary controller to Hubitat and then promoted to primary? And after that ZWA-2 is plugged into Home Assistant
-
Date/time conditionOk, I'm aware of "after" operator, and in this case didn't want to use "between 13:00 and 13:05"
-
Date/time conditionConsider the following example:
This is always true, which is not always evident (e.g. when used within Reactions or there are a lot of other conditions and you miss this one being "green").
Manual says there's no "at" operator, but I was thinking could this behaviour be changed so that when date/time is specified like in my example, it would behave like "at" instead of being always true?
-
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)latest-amd64
-
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325) -
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550@toggledbits now this other case "triggered", so I'll send you rules as JSON and logs with some explanations
-
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550@toggledbits understood. The other case I still have is two rules having partly the same logic, but those identical bits are not behaving in the same way. Just started logging those rules and the next time they behave differently I’ll send you logs along with description what was expected to happen.
-
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550@toggledbits just sent that rule as a JSON, and updated to 25292 which did not address this issue of scrolling a long rule
-
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550@toggledbits I have a couple of "known" issues left with my rules. One is where I have a VERY long rule, a lot of conditions, but even more stuff in reactions, especially groups. It works, but when editing this rule, and trying to scroll down to reactions, I'm constantly taken back to the beginning. After a while (maybe as the whole content is loaded or something?) I'm able to scroll up or down without UI "resisting" (for the lack of better word or description). Not a bug, but more of a usability issue.
I guess I could or should divide the contents to one or two other rules, so that there wouldn't be one long rule as it seems to cause problems. But if you want to look at this, I could send you a JSON file of the rule so that you get a better idea?
-
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550Okay, can confirm that now this problematic rule updates correctly!
-
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550@toggledbits will report shortly (price_array updates at midnight), but wow, Set Rules widget is now lightning fast!

-
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550@toggledbits no, it has been around for a while. Has been renamed though
-
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550@toggledbits using your workaround (clone), but the problem remains with variables not updating correctly as price_array changes, e.g. sum variables do not update. If I (temporarily) modify one of the variables (e.g. change rounding & save), then all the rest changes correctly.
With this particular rule I cannot use Script Action workaround to force updates as I'm using those sum variables as triggers.









