Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor

[SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
solved
44 Posts 3 Posters 11.2k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G gwp1

    @toggledbits of course, no problem! I cannot seem to upload images into this response. I've uploaded to your Dropbox shared folder a pair of images.

    Using the iblind I sent you logs and such for previously as the example, I have a blind called Beach Blind (two guest rooms, one is named Ocean, the other Beach). I use the commands from the ID Beach Blind from zwavejs. As @tamorgen notes, there is also a new one (with the changes HA made) from my HASS controller called Beach Blind Horizontal Slates Angle which has a few less commands including those mentioned starting with x_hass_*.

    I use the ZwaveJSController commands.

    cover.open
    cover.close
    power_switch.on
    power_switch.off
    position.set
    zwave_device.refresh
    zwave_device.set_config

    These are the ones I most commonly use to open, close, and tilt the blinds. refresh is used to force HA to update dasheboards with any changes and set_config I use less often, weekly, to recalibrate the blinds as they do wander sometimes and "open" becomes "open-ish".

    I'd been using power_switch.on to open and cover.close to close. The blinds have been happiest that way. With these new changes from HA, these commands have become hit/miss. In the HA ZWaveJS plugin the status would reflect 0/closed but the blind was clearly wide open.

    Last night/this morning I opted to use position.set and it's been pretty solid from what I've seen throughout the day.
    position.set = 0 nets me a closed blind, position.set = .5 nets me a wide open/"slates level with the ground" blind. I used position.set = .2 or .3 to tilt the sun away during specific dayparts based on sun azimuth.

    I did not grab MSR logs during those tests - apologies, it was 0200 ET and I just wanted the blinds closed for the night. I have amassed 13 of these iblinds over the past couple years.

    If you wish, I'll set some time tonight or tomorrow night and generate some MSR logs.

    T Offline
    T Offline
    tamorgen
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

    With these new changes from HA, these commands have become hit/miss.

    To be precise, it's not so much a change from HA, but from ZWaveJS. They're recognizing a new command class that the developers at iBlinds actually recommend.

    I don't believe the old power switch commands work with the new command class. When I go into a specific device in ZwaveJS, the switch type devices are greyed out.

    46ce7b67-822d-4800-ad9e-84e420f830a6-image.png

    if you go into the switch, it shows it as unavailable.

    b487cb9f-a396-460f-8190-1753e356ff73-image.png

    I would guess the power on/off cover.close / cover.open are remnants and probably need to be removed.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T tamorgen

      @gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

      With these new changes from HA, these commands have become hit/miss.

      To be precise, it's not so much a change from HA, but from ZWaveJS. They're recognizing a new command class that the developers at iBlinds actually recommend.

      I don't believe the old power switch commands work with the new command class. When I go into a specific device in ZwaveJS, the switch type devices are greyed out.

      46ce7b67-822d-4800-ad9e-84e420f830a6-image.png

      if you go into the switch, it shows it as unavailable.

      b487cb9f-a396-460f-8190-1753e356ff73-image.png

      I would guess the power on/off cover.close / cover.open are remnants and probably need to be removed.

      G Offline
      G Offline
      gwp1
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      @tamorgen said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

      I don't believe the old power switch commands work with the new command class. When I go into a specific device in ZwaveJS, the switch type devices are greyed out.

      I noticed this as well. I've also noticed that tapping into the dialogue you're showing (how did you copy/paste images, I keep getting a parsing server error...) nets a slider in HA that does nothing. It literally says UNKNOWN at the top where a percentage would be display of openness or closure.

      171bb72b-e73d-4b6b-8f17-df6dada2ea20-image.png

      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

      *HASS 2025.11.1
      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
      FW: v1.1
      SDK: v7.23.1

      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
      MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
      MQTTController: 25139
      ZWave Controller: 25139

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G gwp1

        @tamorgen said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

        I don't believe the old power switch commands work with the new command class. When I go into a specific device in ZwaveJS, the switch type devices are greyed out.

        I noticed this as well. I've also noticed that tapping into the dialogue you're showing (how did you copy/paste images, I keep getting a parsing server error...) nets a slider in HA that does nothing. It literally says UNKNOWN at the top where a percentage would be display of openness or closure.

        171bb72b-e73d-4b6b-8f17-df6dada2ea20-image.png

        T Offline
        T Offline
        tamorgen
        wrote on last edited by tamorgen
        #22

        @gwp1
        It seems to me that something may be missing from this command class integration. I know iBlinds was working with the ZWaveJS developers. I'm curious is this is what they expected.

        When I look at the entities in MSR, there are a lot of entries that have null or unknown. I'm not sure if this is coming from MSR expecting entries in a specific command class or if ZWaveJs is providing it to MSR that way.

        623091af-63d6-4a31-b68b-5bc8cbd5ff4b-image.png

        Of all the actions in that window, the cover.xxx don't seem to work for me. The only ones that seem to work are:

        x_hass_cover.close_cover_tilt
        x_hass_cover.open_cover_tilt
        x_hass_cover.set_cover_tilt_position

        Others may work, but these are the one's I know specifically work and from an automation perspective meet my needs.

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T tamorgen

          @gwp1
          It seems to me that something may be missing from this command class integration. I know iBlinds was working with the ZWaveJS developers. I'm curious is this is what they expected.

          When I look at the entities in MSR, there are a lot of entries that have null or unknown. I'm not sure if this is coming from MSR expecting entries in a specific command class or if ZWaveJs is providing it to MSR that way.

          623091af-63d6-4a31-b68b-5bc8cbd5ff4b-image.png

          Of all the actions in that window, the cover.xxx don't seem to work for me. The only ones that seem to work are:

          x_hass_cover.close_cover_tilt
          x_hass_cover.open_cover_tilt
          x_hass_cover.set_cover_tilt_position

          Others may work, but these are the one's I know specifically work and from an automation perspective meet my needs.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          @tamorgen Yep. The ZWaveJSController from @toggledbits was doing the same and that's what started this thread. He reviewed data from my system and updated his ZWaveJSController to work with those command classes.

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HASS 2025.11.1
          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
          FW: v1.1
          SDK: v7.23.1

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            tamorgen
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            Okay, gotcha. I did verify that the cover.open using the zwavejscontroller entries does work on my system with the updated release. Curious that the cover.open command does not work using the equivalent haas entity.

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T tamorgen

              Okay, gotcha. I did verify that the cover.open using the zwavejscontroller entries does work on my system with the updated release. Curious that the cover.open command does not work using the equivalent haas entity.

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              @tamorgen cover.open and cover.close worked for me intermittently, eventually degrading to not at all. position.set seems to be working pretty well.

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HASS 2025.11.1
              w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
              FW: v1.1
              SDK: v7.23.1

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G gwp1

                @tamorgen cover.open and cover.close worked for me intermittently, eventually degrading to not at all. position.set seems to be working pretty well.

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gwp1
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                @toggledbits I conducted some tests tonight.

                MSR's ZWaveJSController
                HA ZWaveJSController Plugin via HA

                Sending you an image since I can't upload any here for some reason (parser error) via your file share.

                Results of my tests:
                MSR's ZWJSC: no response
                HA ZWJSC plugin: no response from any command other than x_hass_cover.set_cover_tilt_position

                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.311Z <Rule:INFO> The Internet is up (rule-l2gdh04j in Notifications) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.312Z <Rule:INFO> Check Internet Status (rule-l2f9yuad in Reactor Alerts and Checks) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.313Z <Rule:INFO> HTTP Failed Alerts (rule-l2kd6w6k in Reactor Alerts and Checks) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.313Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Notifier (rule-l9vf6nai in Reactor Alerts and Checks) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.316Z <Rule:INFO> The Internet is up (rule-l2gdh04j in Notifications) starting evaluation; because entity-changed System#reactor_system>system
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.317Z <Rule:INFO> Check Internet Status (rule-l2f9yuad in Reactor Alerts and Checks) starting evaluation; because entity-changed System#reactor_system>system
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.317Z <Rule:INFO> HTTP Failed Alerts (rule-l2kd6w6k in Reactor Alerts and Checks) starting evaluation; because entity-changed System#reactor_system>system
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.317Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Notifier (rule-l9vf6nai in Reactor Alerts and Checks) starting evaluation; because entity-changed System#reactor_system>system
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.318Z <Rule:INFO> The Internet is up (rule-l2gdh04j in Notifications) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.318Z <Rule:INFO> The Internet is up (rule-l2gdh04j in Notifications) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.320Z <Rule:INFO> Check Internet Status (rule-l2f9yuad in Reactor Alerts and Checks) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.320Z <Rule:INFO> Check Internet Status (rule-l2f9yuad in Reactor Alerts and Checks) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.321Z <Rule:INFO> HTTP Failed Alerts (rule-l2kd6w6k in Reactor Alerts and Checks) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.321Z <Rule:INFO> HTTP Failed Alerts (rule-l2kd6w6k in Reactor Alerts and Checks) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.322Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Notifier (rule-l9vf6nai in Reactor Alerts and Checks) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.323Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Notifier (rule-l9vf6nai in Reactor Alerts and Checks) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.323Z <Rule:INFO> The Internet is up (rule-l2gdh04j in Notifications) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.323Z <Rule:INFO> Check Internet Status (rule-l2f9yuad in Reactor Alerts and Checks) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.324Z <Rule:INFO> HTTP Failed Alerts (rule-l2kd6w6k in Reactor Alerts and Checks) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.324Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Notifier (rule-l9vf6nai in Reactor Alerts and Checks) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.346Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) starting evaluation; because entity-changed ValueSensor#hass>sensor_john_iphone_battery_status
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.349Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.349Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:45.350Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:50.341Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) starting evaluation; because entity-changed ValueSensor#hass>sensor_john_iphone_battery_status
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:50.347Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:50.348Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:50.349Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:51.559Z <HubitatController:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat ignoring DEVICE event for device 1405 (Sun Position); device not enumerated by Maker API
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:51.600Z <HubitatController:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat ignoring DEVICE event for device 1405 (Sun Position); device not enumerated by Maker API
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:51.662Z <HubitatController:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat ignoring DEVICE event for device 1405 (Sun Position); device not enumerated by Maker API
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:55.352Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) starting evaluation; because entity-changed ValueSensor#hass>sensor_john_iphone_battery_status
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:55.357Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:55.357Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:55.359Z <Rule:INFO> Change to Night (via ESPresense) (rule-kwc6rmci in Mode Triggers) evaluation complete
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:55.426Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Blinds DR Open" (re-kx6a2k13)
                **[latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:55.429Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Blinds DR Open (re-kx6a2k13)**
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.685Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:798> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs handling node event statistics updated entity Cover#zwavejs>22-0
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.767Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:798> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs handling node event value updated entity Cover#zwavejs>22-0
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.769Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:994> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 22 value "0:106:targetValue:23" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 22, "args": { "commandClassName": "Window Covering", "commandClass": 106, "endpoint": 0, "property": "targetValue", "propertyKey": 23, "newValue": 50, "prevValue": 0, "propertyName": "targetValue", "propertyKeyName": "Horizontal Slats Angle" } }
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.770Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:1006> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs updating attributes for node 22 value "0:106:targetValue:23"=50: [Array][  ]
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.771Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:1025> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting Cover#zwavejs>22-0.x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_targetValue_23 to 50
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.782Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:798> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs handling node event value updated entity Cover#zwavejs>22-0
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.783Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:994> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 22 value "0:106:currentValue:23" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 22, "args": { "commandClassName": "Window Covering", "commandClass": 106, "property": "currentValue", "propertyKey": 23, "endpoint": 0, "newValue": 50, "prevValue": 0, "propertyName": "currentValue", "propertyKeyName": "Horizontal Slats Angle" } }
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.785Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:1006> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs updating attributes for node 22 value "0:106:currentValue:23"=50: [Array][ "cover.state", "position.value" ]
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.787Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:1013> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs updating attribute cover.state with [Object]{ "entity": "22-0", "impl": { "expr": "!(value == 0 || value >= 99)", "valueId": "106:currentValue:23" } }
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.787Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:947> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs _apply_value entity Cover#zwavejs>22-0 cover.state
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.788Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:987> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs _apply_value cover.state=true
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.789Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:1013> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs updating attribute position.value with [Object]{ "entity": "22-0", "impl": { "expr": "round( value / 99, 2 )", "valueId": "106:currentValue:23" } }
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.790Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:947> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs _apply_value entity Cover#zwavejs>22-0 position.value
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.791Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:987> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs _apply_value position.value=0.51
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.792Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:1025> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting Cover#zwavejs>22-0.x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_currentValue_23 to 50
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.807Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass action x_hass_cover.set_cover_tilt_position([Object]{ "tilt_position": 50 }) on Cover#hass>cover_dining_room2_horizontal_slats_angle succeeded
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.809Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Blinds DR Open (re-kx6a2k13) from step 1
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.810Z <Engine:NOTICE> Blinds DR Open delaying until 1694993697809<9/17/2023, 7:34:57 PM>
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:56.930Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:798> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs handling node event statistics updated entity Cover#zwavejs>22-0
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:57.811Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Blinds DR Open (re-kx6a2k13) from step 2
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:57.812Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing zwave_device.refresh on Cover#zwavejs>7-0 with [Object]{  }
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:57.814Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:1750> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs no implementation mapped; attempting default
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:57.815Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:751> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs sending #1694993697815<9/17/2023, 7:34:57 PM>: [Object]{ "command": "node.refresh_values", "nodeId": 7, "messageId": 1694993697815 }
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:57.830Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:778> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs command result error: [Object]{ "type": "result", "success": false, "messageId": 1694993697815, "errorCode": "node_not_found", "args": { "nodeId": 7 } }
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:57.832Z <ZWaveJSController:ERR> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs request 1694993697815<9/17/2023, 7:34:57 PM> (node.refresh_values) failed: [Error] node_not_found [-]
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:57.834Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Blinds DR Open (re-kx6a2k13) from step 3
                [latest-23242]2023-09-17T23:34:57.835Z <Engine:INFO> Blinds DR Open all actions completed.
                

                If you'd like the whole log I can upload that as well or anything else you need for review.

                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                *HASS 2025.11.1
                w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                FW: v1.1
                SDK: v7.23.1

                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                MQTTController: 25139
                ZWave Controller: 25139

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                  #27

                  Yeah, a clean log would be good to review. In your logging.yaml, please add the following (if there's already a section for ZWaveJSController, just modify it to make it look like this):

                    ZWaveJSController:
                      level: 5
                      streams:
                        - type: file
                          name: zwavejs.log
                          keep: 2
                          level: 999
                          recycle: true
                  

                  Restart Reactor and run a test (or a few) of cover.open and cover.close and position.set. Then copy just the zwavejs.log file up together with your latest zwavejs_devices_initial.json to link I sent you earlier. Thank you!

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  G T 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    Yeah, a clean log would be good to review. In your logging.yaml, please add the following (if there's already a section for ZWaveJSController, just modify it to make it look like this):

                      ZWaveJSController:
                        level: 5
                        streams:
                          - type: file
                            name: zwavejs.log
                            keep: 2
                            level: 999
                            recycle: true
                    

                    Restart Reactor and run a test (or a few) of cover.open and cover.close and position.set. Then copy just the zwavejs.log file up together with your latest zwavejs_devices_initial.json to link I sent you earlier. Thank you!

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    gwp1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    @toggledbits I actually had that logging enabled already and didn't realize/remember it.

                    Scenarios tested:

                    Test #1: 22-0 ~10:20 ET
                    ZWJSC, cover.close
                    Result: blind closed, "inside down"
                    ZWJSC, cover.open
                    Result: blind opened, position=50%
                    Repeated, same results

                    Test #2: 22-0
                    ZWJSC, position.set = 0
                    Result: blind closed, "inside up"
                    ZWJSC, position.set = .5
                    Result: blind opened, position=50%
                    Repeated, same results

                    Test #3: 22-0
                    ZWJSC, cover.close
                    Result: blind closed, "inside down"
                    ZWJSC, cover.open
                    Result: blind opened, position=50%
                    Repeated, same results

                    Unfortunately, everything WAI. Kinda frustrated at the moment. Same blind as last night's testing when nothing responded. Log being uploaded momentarily.

                    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                    *HASS 2025.11.1
                    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                    FW: v1.1
                    SDK: v7.23.1

                    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                    MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                    MQTTController: 25139
                    ZWave Controller: 25139

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      Yeah, a clean log would be good to review. In your logging.yaml, please add the following (if there's already a section for ZWaveJSController, just modify it to make it look like this):

                        ZWaveJSController:
                          level: 5
                          streams:
                            - type: file
                              name: zwavejs.log
                              keep: 2
                              level: 999
                              recycle: true
                      

                      Restart Reactor and run a test (or a few) of cover.open and cover.close and position.set. Then copy just the zwavejs.log file up together with your latest zwavejs_devices_initial.json to link I sent you earlier. Thank you!

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      tamorgen
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      @gwp1 ,
                      Not to steal your thread, but out of curiosity, have you noticed any issues with battery life lately? I've noticed that a few of my iBlinds are draining very rapidly, ending in a unresponsive state. I've charged them, then less than a week later, they are dead and unresponsive.

                      They all appear to be the older v2 iBlinds, so it could just be that the batteries are ending their useful life, however, it's also possible that the new configuration and command class is affecting them in some way. I'm gradually replacing them, as I've found the v3.1 iBlinds to be much more reliable. I haven't noticed this behavior in the v3.1 iBlinds.

                      I'm just curious if you've seen this as well. If you are seeing it, it could be an issue with how ZWaveJS is communicating with the iBlinds due to this new roleout.

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T tamorgen

                        @gwp1 ,
                        Not to steal your thread, but out of curiosity, have you noticed any issues with battery life lately? I've noticed that a few of my iBlinds are draining very rapidly, ending in a unresponsive state. I've charged them, then less than a week later, they are dead and unresponsive.

                        They all appear to be the older v2 iBlinds, so it could just be that the batteries are ending their useful life, however, it's also possible that the new configuration and command class is affecting them in some way. I'm gradually replacing them, as I've found the v3.1 iBlinds to be much more reliable. I haven't noticed this behavior in the v3.1 iBlinds.

                        I'm just curious if you've seen this as well. If you are seeing it, it could be an issue with how ZWaveJS is communicating with the iBlinds due to this new roleout.

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        gwp1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        @tamorgen Not entirely stealing or off-topic as that has played a role before in iblind responsiveness. I have solar panels on mine - 50/50 on how well they work. My blinds are all v3.1, btw, @toggledbits, just as a point of reference.

                        I have found if ZWaveJS HA Plugin shows anything under 60% battery the blinds become unresponsive. A quick plug of the power cable and a tap of the ping button and the physical button on the blind itself and they come back.

                        For this specific topic, all tested blinds are either plugged in or showing 100% battery.

                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                        *HASS 2025.11.1
                        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                        FW: v1.1
                        SDK: v7.23.1

                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                        MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                        MQTTController: 25139
                        ZWave Controller: 25139

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G gwp1

                          @tamorgen Not entirely stealing or off-topic as that has played a role before in iblind responsiveness. I have solar panels on mine - 50/50 on how well they work. My blinds are all v3.1, btw, @toggledbits, just as a point of reference.

                          I have found if ZWaveJS HA Plugin shows anything under 60% battery the blinds become unresponsive. A quick plug of the power cable and a tap of the ping button and the physical button on the blind itself and they come back.

                          For this specific topic, all tested blinds are either plugged in or showing 100% battery.

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          tamorgen
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          @gwp1,
                          Thanks, I figured it couldn't hurt to ask someone else running HA to see if they were experiencing the same problems. I think it just might be old batteries.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Offline
                            T Offline
                            tamorgen
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            @gwp1,
                            I'm working on trying to make something useful in the dashboards using this new device class, and it's not going well. I've reached out to iBlinds/Eric B for help. What we are both seeing as unknown/null states could be a problem.

                            There are three values that are null or unknown: cover.state, position.value, and then a repeat using the x_hass.state.
                            Capture4.PNG

                            When I go into Developer Tools in HA, the state is unknown as well. That makes sense since MSR has to grab it from somewhere.
                            Capture2.PNG I'm trying to work on my dashboard and display some useful information, and I'm unable to get the value of the attributes. I'm guessing that's because the State is unknown.
                            Capture5.PNG

                            Hopefully iBlinds can work with HA and ZWaveJS and get these values to show properly.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #33

                              Yeah, logs confirm everything going out as expected, ZWJS acknowledging the request, and also sending a notification for a value change asynchronously. ZWaveJSController appears to be doing the right things. ZWaveJS appears to be doing its part as well.

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                Yeah, logs confirm everything going out as expected, ZWJS acknowledging the request, and also sending a notification for a value change asynchronously. ZWaveJSController appears to be doing the right things. ZWaveJS appears to be doing its part as well.

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                gwp1
                                wrote on last edited by gwp1
                                #34

                                @toggledbits I'm conducting an experiment.

                                DR2 blind (22-0) is configured as [Default] direction and using MSRs ZWJSController. I have set the three Reactions to:

                                DR OPEN: cover.open
                                DR CLOSE: cover.close
                                DR @25: position.set = .75 (resulting in the blind being tilted open 25%, "top inside").

                                All other iblinds are using HA's ZWJSC plugin and all ran flawlessly for the past 24 hours. I'm wondering if this issue is somehow load-induced. If this single blind remains solid I will add a second and so on.

                                UPDATE: as my patience level on any given day runs the gamut between saint and toddler I've added KITCHEN (18-0) to this test with the same settings as above excepting .80 instead of .75. Both of these iblinds were the most impacted in being unresponsive.

                                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                *HASS 2025.11.1
                                w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                                FW: v1.1
                                SDK: v7.23.1

                                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                                MQTTController: 25139
                                ZWave Controller: 25139

                                G 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G gwp1

                                  @toggledbits I'm conducting an experiment.

                                  DR2 blind (22-0) is configured as [Default] direction and using MSRs ZWJSController. I have set the three Reactions to:

                                  DR OPEN: cover.open
                                  DR CLOSE: cover.close
                                  DR @25: position.set = .75 (resulting in the blind being tilted open 25%, "top inside").

                                  All other iblinds are using HA's ZWJSC plugin and all ran flawlessly for the past 24 hours. I'm wondering if this issue is somehow load-induced. If this single blind remains solid I will add a second and so on.

                                  UPDATE: as my patience level on any given day runs the gamut between saint and toddler I've added KITCHEN (18-0) to this test with the same settings as above excepting .80 instead of .75. Both of these iblinds were the most impacted in being unresponsive.

                                  G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  gwp1
                                  wrote on last edited by gwp1
                                  #35

                                  @toggledbits we have fail!

                                  Added two more iblinds to the test. They failed to respond so I isolated one of them and did the following tests on node 8-0:

                                  LR Left OPEN: cover.open
                                  LR Left CLOSE: cover.close
                                  LR Left @20: position.set = .80 (resulting in the blind being tilted open 20%, "top inside").

                                  Results:
                                  cover.open = iblind opens, position of 50
                                  cover.close = iblind moves to position of 50 <---expected result, position 0
                                  position.set = iblind moves to position of 80

                                  As this Reaction was to run BOTH left and right blinds I removed the right blind and ran the left solo as the kitchen and DR are (both still working fine, btw). For reference, Kitchen was existing unit and was re-interviewed to be current, DR is a brand new unit. LR's are existing units re-interviewed.

                                  Log forthcoming.

                                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                  *HASS 2025.11.1
                                  w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                                  FW: v1.1
                                  SDK: v7.23.1

                                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                  MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                                  MQTTController: 25139
                                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                                  toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    tamorgen
                                    wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                                    #36

                                    @gwp1, I just replaced 6 of my ib2 motors with ib3.1, and they are working just fine (12 of 14 are v3.1). I can control them from MSR with ZWJSController without issue.

                                    My only issue is actually Home Assistant itself. I've had to go to great lengths to get a somewhat working card for each of the blinds in my home, and I'm still not completely there yet. I'm hoping either the ZWaveJS devlopers or the HA developers figure out whats going on with the 'state' value for each of these, as they all return 'unknown', so none of the cards work out of the box.

                                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • T tamorgen

                                      @gwp1, I just replaced 6 of my ib2 motors with ib3.1, and they are working just fine (12 of 14 are v3.1). I can control them from MSR with ZWJSController without issue.

                                      My only issue is actually Home Assistant itself. I've had to go to great lengths to get a somewhat working card for each of the blinds in my home, and I'm still not completely there yet. I'm hoping either the ZWaveJS devlopers or the HA developers figure out whats going on with the 'state' value for each of these, as they all return 'unknown', so none of the cards work out of the box.

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      gwp1
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #37

                                      @tamorgen said in [SOLVED-ish] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                                      they are working just fine (12 of 14 are v3.1). I can control them from MSR with ZWJSController without issue.

                                      It's more helpful if, instead of generalized statements, you provide settings/configurations you're using whilst having this success for comparison sake.

                                      I ran into an issue this morning wherein, after completing the weekly zwave_device.set_config, the iblinds finish in a closed position but reporting back in all systems (HA, both ZWJSC's, and MSR) as 50 or open. I've created a workaround wherein, after completing the config, they wait a few seconds then tilt 20% and then set back to open.

                                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                      *HASS 2025.11.1
                                      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                                      FW: v1.1
                                      SDK: v7.23.1

                                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                      MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                                      MQTTController: 25139
                                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • G gwp1

                                        @tamorgen said in [SOLVED-ish] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                                        they are working just fine (12 of 14 are v3.1). I can control them from MSR with ZWJSController without issue.

                                        It's more helpful if, instead of generalized statements, you provide settings/configurations you're using whilst having this success for comparison sake.

                                        I ran into an issue this morning wherein, after completing the weekly zwave_device.set_config, the iblinds finish in a closed position but reporting back in all systems (HA, both ZWJSC's, and MSR) as 50 or open. I've created a workaround wherein, after completing the config, they wait a few seconds then tilt 20% and then set back to open.

                                        T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        tamorgen
                                        wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                                        #38

                                        @gwp1 said in [SOLVED-ish] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                                        It's more helpful if, instead of generalized statements, you provide settings/configurations you're using whilst having this success for comparison sake.

                                        All of mine are like this, cover.close, cover.open.

                                        Perform cover.close on Office Blind Left (zwavejs>30-0)
                                        Delay for 5 seconds
                                        Perform cover.close on Office Blind Right (zwavejs>31-0)
                                        Delay for 5 seconds
                                        Perform zwave_device.refresh on Office Blind Left (zwavejs>30-0)
                                        Perform zwave_device.refresh on Office Blind Right (zwavejs>31-0)
                                        

                                        I'm not even sure the zwave.device.refresh is needed anymore. This was more of an issue when trying to force the old device class to refresh on both the binary switch and the multi-level switch, as they weren't directly connected and didn't update each other. It was one of the reasons that the folks at iBlinds were pushing to get the window device class implemented.

                                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T tamorgen

                                          @gwp1 said in [SOLVED-ish] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:

                                          It's more helpful if, instead of generalized statements, you provide settings/configurations you're using whilst having this success for comparison sake.

                                          All of mine are like this, cover.close, cover.open.

                                          Perform cover.close on Office Blind Left (zwavejs>30-0)
                                          Delay for 5 seconds
                                          Perform cover.close on Office Blind Right (zwavejs>31-0)
                                          Delay for 5 seconds
                                          Perform zwave_device.refresh on Office Blind Left (zwavejs>30-0)
                                          Perform zwave_device.refresh on Office Blind Right (zwavejs>31-0)
                                          

                                          I'm not even sure the zwave.device.refresh is needed anymore. This was more of an issue when trying to force the old device class to refresh on both the binary switch and the multi-level switch, as they weren't directly connected and didn't update each other. It was one of the reasons that the folks at iBlinds were pushing to get the window device class implemented.

                                          G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          gwp1
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #39

                                          @tamorgen I see you doing the delay as I do. How do you do a weekly config? (The blinds will "drift" if not config'd weekly or bi-weekly.

                                          I have removed the zwave_device.refresh to see how that goes.

                                          Question: you have a great number of blinds in your fleet as do I - how many blinds do you group together? I see you grouped two for your office blinds, do you have more than two at a time grouped in a single reaction? Or are you skipping reactions and adding each entity in each ruleset?

                                          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                                          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                          *HASS 2025.11.1
                                          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                                          FW: v1.1
                                          SDK: v7.23.1

                                          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                          MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                                          MQTTController: 25139
                                          ZWave Controller: 25139

                                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Error: Command timeout
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            6
                                            107

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            131
                                            74.6k

                                          • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            5
                                            186

                                          • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            6
                                            219

                                          • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            1
                                            1
                                            75

                                          • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                                            M
                                            mgvra
                                            1
                                            3
                                            170

                                          • Script action and custom timers
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            186

                                          • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            12
                                            495

                                          • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            1
                                            2
                                            147

                                          • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            6
                                            223

                                          • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            17
                                            632

                                          • Shelly Wall Display XL
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            2
                                            9
                                            918
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved