I've managed to use MSR UI on iOS devices to some degree*, so that although UI elements (e.g. rule sets) are not visible in portrait mode, you've seen them in landscape. Now with recents builds (24302) this does not work anymore, elements (rule sets, entities) are not anymore visible in landscape mode.
Does anyone have similar experiences? Using iOS 18 and Safari/Chrome browser.
( *Drag & drop of rule conditions have never worked on a mobile)
Hi @toggledbits,
I have lots of logs with this:
<Engine:ERR> Assignment to alarm ignored -- expression-driven global cannot be set by assignmentAny hints to where look at to avoid this? Thanks.
Hi @toggledbits
I'd like to update my controllers with these new features, but I'm struggling to find any guidance in the docs - and in general to understand the context.
Could you please elaborate more? Thanks.
I have the following ACL defined:
groups: admin: users: - admin applications: true api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: trueAnd I have authenticated to MSR as "admin" user. However, I'm getting "access denied" when trying to access http://*******:8111/api/v1/log
So what I'm missing, is my ACL incorrectly defined?
Using build 24302 on Docker.
Thanks to @toggledbits for adding a custom CSS. I've started doing a darker Reactor style.
Here's the file: https://gist.github.com/dbochicchio/825098ac13b7f8cac22012eae37ff7ce
A couple of things are still too bright and I'll eventually catch-up. Just place it under your /config directory, naming the file as customstyles.css. Hard refresh your browser.
Hi!
In Home Assistant I sometimes uses the TTS, either to my Sonos or Google speakers. With reactor in Vera I also use TTS.
But in MSR I can't select the TTS-service. It's simply not there. Am I missing something, or is this the case, so far?
Thanks!
/Fanan
Hi
I have just connected a bunch of EzloPi controllers to MSR to import some ESP based devices etc.
They all seemed to have worked and imported in to MSR apart from I have one missing device. It is a Digital Gas Sensor device.
This is how that device looks in the Ezlo API.
Devices Info:
_id: "10696001" deviceTypeId: "ezlopi" parentDeviceId: "10696000" category: "level_sensor" subcategory: "" gatewayId: "457a5069" batteryPowered: false name: "Gas Sensor Digital" type: "sensor" reachable: true persistent: true serviceNotification: false armed: false roomId: "" security: "no" ready: true status: "idle" parentRoom: true protectConfig: "default"Items Info:
_id: "20696001" deviceId: "10696001" hasGetter: true hasSetter: false name: "smoke_density" show: true valueType: "substance_amount" scale: "parts_per_million" value: 2.7472610473632812 valueFormatted: "2.75" status: "idle"There is also an Analog Gas sensor that one did import in to MSR OK.
68d63dab-b871-4f44-912b-cf6e0b9eb4c6-image.png
Devices Info:
_id: "10696000" deviceTypeId: "ezlopi" parentDeviceId: "10696000" category: "security_sensor" subcategory: "gas" gatewayId: "457a5069" batteryPowered: false name: "Gas Sensor Analog" type: "sensor" reachable: true persistent: true serviceNotification: false armed: false roomId: "" security: "no" ready: true status: "idle" parentRoom: true protectConfig: "default"Items Info:
_id: "20696000" deviceId: "10696000" hasGetter: true hasSetter: false name: "gas_alarm" show: true valueType: "token" enum: 0: "no_gas" 1: "combustible_gas_detected" 2: "toxic_gas_detected" 3: "unknown" valueFormatted: "no_gas" value: "no_gas" status: "idle"And this is how this MQ2 Gas Sensor looks like on their dashboard:
Digital
cb77dfa3-4af5-4d06-9635-89207a716a89-image.png
Analog
4fb4da1b-e946-4b89-876c-bcd9f5699b6c-image.png
They have an EzloPi website here you can create your own sensor projects using ESP boards, which is very interesting stuff!
And I just wrote on the Ezlo forum here, how to connect an EzloPi controller to MSR.
THANKS.
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.A couple of things for you @toggledbits, since you mentioned that this release has new features and some tweaks are expected.
Local expressions cannot be deleted. Pushing the X button has no effect for me.
When cloning an entity action, the result is strange (first is cloned one, second is the original action):
a92ea094-9e2c-4aaa-bf47-2d07a6ffdbd0-image.png
When changing the action on the cloned element, the params are added to the original one. See screenshot:
92ac3011-83c8-466b-bd23-47d483ad7a52-image.png
Dark theme has a couple of strange contrasts. One is visible in the previous screenshots (white text on yellow background). Another one is in groups (blue text on blue background):
9b3c4988-53ef-44e6-9672-30e744cacb75-image.png
Overall, I found blue, yellow, red and green (in buttons and forms) to be too bright.
On the bright side:
I love the new script action: thank you! The dark theme is a great start to avoid getting blinded at night I promise I'll try very soon the new features around actions. Thanks!@toggledbits
I just upgraded to version MSR 24293, bare metal running on Fedora. Upon restart, I am getting a error banner:
I followed the new directions about npm
npm i --no-save --no-package-lock --omit dev
Any idea what the issue is?
Seems like switching the UI to the newly added dark mode (thank you for this) does nothing. The UI stays in light mode and only a few buttons turn into dark mode (see screenshot)
Things I have tried:
Hard refresh
Different browser
Different computer
Restarting Reactor
Failed troubleshooting attempts:
No errors in Chrome console
No relevant errors in Reactor log (can still PM the full log file)
Reactor version: latest-24293-ea42a81d
Hardware: Odroid N2+
Linux version: Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
3df2806f-9146-485b-9ec1-d056e91cefe5-image.png Dark mode enabled
ff823023-c079-4684-b01f-d6ac6527d31a-image.png Light mode enabled
Good morning,
I have a service MQTT service that needs a restart occasionally. The add-on (Smartbed MQTT) is for the smart bed base for my bed. It has a "safety light" that I can control from HAAS & MSR as a light entity, and also moves the head of the bed to a preset at bedtime, and then lies it back flat in the morning The problem is, from time to time, the light becomes "unavailable" Restarting from the Add-ons tab in HAAS always fixes it, but I should be able to detect when it happens when "light.tempur_pedic_safety_lights" is not true or false, i.e., unavailable.
What I don't know how to do is how to restart that service. Does anybody have experience in restarting add-ons from MSR?
Running:
Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-24212-3ce15e25 ZWaveJSController [0.1.24232]HAAS:
RPi5-64 (8GB) Core 2024.7.3 Supervisor 2024.08.0 Operating System 13.0 Frontend 20240710.0Hi!
Is it possible to generate two additional log files, the first being the replica of what is displayed on screen by the Rule History widgets and the other with Recently Changed Entities?
And could I configure the generation of one file per day, and delete the older ones? For example, store the last 5 days?
And being more ambitious, does Windget have an icon to open these TXT files in the navigated?
Well, we're approaching Christmas, so here's my request to Santa Claus @toggledbits 🙂
Hi @toggledbits
I'm working on a controller to generate llm response from a prompt in reactor. I have http response coming thru an http request action at the moment, capturing the response inside a local variable. So, it's practically sync.
I want to create a controller, so I don't have to rely on a proxy (and have a simpler architecture), and duplicate absurd http actions, but AFAIK in the current implementation, actions are async only. But if I have multiple requests going on, I cannot be sure what it's really inside an attribute. I also thought that something like a correlation id when sending the request could be used to identity multiple responses, but I wanted to double check with you before starting with something too complicated. I also noticed that some actions in home assistant (ie forecast) are sync and I'm wondering if you have any plan or hint to address this situation. Thanks.
Thanks.
@togglebits I am curious as to why the tilt_sensor.state (primary) = NULL. I believe it should show true or false. I have to use binary_sensor.state instead in my rules.
Again, not sure if this is related to Reactor/ZwaveJSController implementation or the actual Z-Wave JS UI docker version. I have copied, below, the attributes of the tilt sensor in hopes it can help.
Thanks in advance.
Reactor version 23302
ZWaveJSController version 23254
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.3.0.724519f
zwave-js version 12.2.3
@toggledbits I have noticed after upgrading both Reactor and ZWaveJSController to version 24257 that two of my devices/entities, TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO and Zooz ZSE18, had their entity re-named in an unusual way and also appears to be duplicated.
Reactor version 24257
ZWaveJSController version 24257
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.18.1
zwave-js version 13.2.0
Vestibule Motion Sensor State attributes/partial screenshot of entities it created. All entities have the same attributes.
motion_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Home_Security_Motion_sensor_status=8 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=23 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Home Security","Home Security","Motion sensor status","Motion sensor status"] zwave_device.version_info=nullTilt Sensor Door State and Tilt Sensor Door State Simple attributes/partial screenshot of entities it created. All entities have similar attributes with exception of x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_State = 22 or 23.
tilt_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=22 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state","Door state"] zwave_device.version_info=null tilt_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=22 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state (simple)","Door state (simple)"] zwave_device.version_info=null tilt_sensor.state=false x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=23 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state","Door state"] zwave_device.version_info=null tilt_sensor.state=false x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=23 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state (simple)","Door state (simple)"] zwave_device.version_info=nullI'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only).
Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package:
Contrib MQTT templates for Reactor. Contribute to dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib development by creating an account on GitHub.
Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go.
I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them.
The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression.
Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests 🙂
Fail safe condition for battery devices
-
Good morning,
I'm trying to figure out if there is a way to evaluate if a command was completed and retry if it did not complete.I have 14 iBlinds 3.1 z-wave controllers in my home. 95% of the time, they work just fine. Occasionally, I'll get a blind that does not open on the first attempt. When I go into Home Assistant, and manually open or close the blind, it works.
I have 3 reactions set up for each room. One to open, one to close, and one partial open for sun glare. Each of them is set up as below.
The reactions are set up to wait for 5 seconds before going onto the next blind, so the z-wave network doesn't get overwhelmed.
In addition, the set command to run the reactions has "Wait for completion" checked.
I also have a routine set up whenever a z-wave device reports as non-functional (dead), it'll get pinged to wake it up. This usually works to wake them up.
Appreciate any ideas to make this more reliable.
I'm running:
- Reactor latest-24190-bd310acc, Bare-metal on Fedora
- WaveJSController [0.1.23326]
- Home Assistant: 2024.7.0
-
@tamorgen said in Fail safe condition for battery devices:
Appreciate any ideas to make this more reliable.
Have you considered using a "while" group? Here's a simple example in a Reaction. You can embellish on this for more reliability:
The first action forces a refresh on the device, and the delay gives it a little time to settle. From there, the Repeat...While runs while the lock remains unlocked... it tries to lock the lock, and then waits a minute and will try again if the lock remains unlocked. You could add a refresh inside the loop as well.
-
@toggledbits
Thanks Patrick. That's exactly what I was looking for. I didn't even know about that Repeat While condition....2 blinds down, 12 to go..... Oh, multiply by 3.... open, close, sun.
This may take a while.
-
Okay, I may have spoke to soon.... the first blind in the series keeps opening and closing when I run it.
The idea here.... the repeat while checks for the position.... If it does not equal 0 (range is 0-100), then it is open. The action is cover.close, and then delay for 10 seconds before going on to the next one.
What could it be causing it to be stuck in the loop? I'm monitoring what it's doing, and the Current value: (number) changes between 0 and 50, whereas 50 being the open position.
-
The iBlinds 3.x implementation in ZWaveJSController commands 99 for close, not 0. Try using
position.set
with 0 instead. -
@toggledbits said in Fail safe condition for battery devices:
The iBlinds 3.x implementation in ZWaveJSController commands 99 for close, not 0. Try using
position.set
with 0 instead.Not quite working either. Position 99 is Closed, down inside. Position 0 is Closed, up inside. The cover.open and cover.close commands work in my previous iteration. When I try and use the position.set command, I get unexpected results.
Below is the corresponding Open version. When I set the position.set to 50, which is 50% (halfway between 0 & 99, so the blinds are flat and fully open, it set's the position to 99, not 50.
If I use position.set to 1, the current value changes to 99, so for opening the blinds to that 50 value, position.set does not appear to be appropriate.
iBlinds now uses the Window Covering command class and not the previously used multilevel switch window class, which works fine for roller blinds, but not horizontal blinds.
-
Sorry, I erred... try using values in the range of 0 to 1 (so 50 = 0.5) for
position.set
.I would also be consistent and not use the extended attributes (
x_zwave_values...
), but ratherposition.value
and/orcover.state
. -
@toggledbits said in Fail safe condition for battery devices:
Sorry, I erred... try using values in the range of 0 to 1 (so 50 = 0.5) for
position.set
.I would also be consistent and not use the extended attributes (
x_zwave_values...
), but ratherposition.value
and/orcover.state
.That makes sense. The cover.state is a True/False value, so I'm not quite sure what that does.
I've revised it, and I've extended the delay times out a bit. The first blind opens correctly, but the second one opens, and then closes itself again. I'm really perpelexed as to why.
-
@tamorgen said in Fail safe condition for battery devices:
That makes sense. The cover.state is a True/False value, so I'm not quite sure what that does.
Can you also post the full attributes for this device (using the Copy Attributes button)?
-
@toggledbits said in Fail safe condition for battery devices:
Can you also post the full attributes for this device (using the Copy Attributes button)?
Here you go:
battery_power.level=0.9 battery_power.since=1721846488511 cover.state=false position.value=0 x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Cover","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=17;deviceClass.specific.key=7","capabilities":["cover","toggle","position"],"primary_attribute":"cover.state","description":"Window Blind Controller","model":"iblinds V3","default_name":"Window Blind Controller","values":[{"valueId":"38:currentValue:","capabilities":{"cover":{"attributes":{"state":{"expr":"!(value == 0 || value >= 99)"}},"actions":{"open":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":50},"close":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":99},"stop":false}},"position":{"attributes":{"value":{"expr":"round( value / 99, 2 )"}},"actions":{"set":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( parameters.value ?# 0 ), 0 ) ) )"}},"increase":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"decrease":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) - ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"relative":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}}}},"toggle":{"actions":{"toggle":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":{"expr":"entity.attributes.cover.state ? 99 : 50"}}}}}}],"manufacturerId":647,"productType":4,"productId":113} x_zwave_values.Battery_isLow=false x_zwave_values.Battery_level=90 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Close_Interval=15 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Default_ON_Value=50 x_zwave_values.Configuration_MC=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Maximum_Tilt_Level=null x_zwave_values.Configuration_Minimum_Tilt_Level=null x_zwave_values.Configuration_Movement_Duration=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Override_Response_to_ON_Command=null x_zwave_values.Configuration_Remote_Calibration=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Reset_Button=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Reverse_Direction=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Send_Reports=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_3=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_4=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_5=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_identify=null x_zwave_values.Indicator_timeout=null x_zwave_values.Indicator_value=null x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=647 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=114 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=4 x_zwave_values.Version_applicationBuildNumber=43707 x_zwave_values.Version_applicationFrameworkAPIVersion="3.12.1" x_zwave_values.Version_applicationFrameworkBuildNumber=35 x_zwave_values.Version_applicationVersion="3.12.1" x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["3.12"] x_zwave_values.Version_hardwareVersion=2 x_zwave_values.Version_hostInterfaceBuildNumber=0 x_zwave_values.Version_hostInterfaceVersion="unused" x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=3 x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="7.12" x_zwave_values.Version_sdkVersion="7.12.2" x_zwave_values.Version_zWaveProtocolBuildNumber=35 x_zwave_values.Version_zWaveProtocolVersion="7.12.2" x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_currentValue_23=0 x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_duration_23={"value":0,"unit":"seconds"} x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_levelChangeDown_23=null x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_levelChangeUp_23=null x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_targetValue_23=0 zwave_device.capabilities=[106,112,114,128,134,135] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=false zwave_device.generic_class="Multilevel Switch" zwave_device.impl_sig="23326:1:23260:1" zwave_device.is_beaming=false zwave_device.is_listening=false zwave_device.is_routing=true zwave_device.is_secure=true zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[647,4,114] zwave_device.max_data_rate=null zwave_device.node_id=80 zwave_device.specific_class="Motor Control Class C" zwave_device.status=4 zwave_device.status_text="alive" zwave_device.version_info=[null,"3.12.1"]
-
So is it 80 or 81 that's not staying in the expected state?
-
Can you command 80 from the Entities list using the same actions and values?
-
@toggledbits said in Fail safe condition for battery devices:
Can you command 80 from the Entities list using the same actions and values?
Yes, it opens to 50% using position.set .50
When I use the reaction, it does change to .5, but then changes back after 20 or 30 seconds.
-
Is there a rule that could be triggered by the shade moving that's still active?
-
@toggledbits said in Fail safe condition for battery devices:
Is there a rule that could be triggered by the shade moving that's still active?
I don't believe so. I believe I would see other rules flashing active/green, were that to happen. If that was the case, manually doing it either through HA or through the entities tab, like you just had me do, would cause that reaction as well.
BTW, that was one of the first things I thought of. I had two separate reactor windows open, so I could monitor the Reactions tab, as well as the Blinds Rule Set rules simultaneously.
-
Perhaps, but there's no command setting to closed in that reaction, either.
Another way to look at this is to open a second tab for Reactor, and stay on the Status page with the Running Reactions widget displayed. If the blind closes after the Reaction has stopped running, that suggests the command to close it is coming from elsewhere.
And of course, any time things don't look as expected, you should always be looking in the logs.
Edit: based on your edit, I'd make sure all rules doing anything with blinds are disabled during this testing.
-
@toggledbits said in Fail safe condition for battery devices:
Perhaps, but there's no command setting to closed in that reaction, either.
WAIT -- WHAT'S THIS???
-
That would be me dying of embarrassment. I'm not sure how that got there.
Removed and surprise surprise, works fine.
-
Whew! All good!