-
Hubitat C7 = 2.3.2.141 AND 2.3.3.123
MSR in a docker = latest-22264-93bf3814 and latest-22266-88868fc0I'm curious if this is a bug or expected behavior. Unfortunately I don't know exactly when this began either. I have renamed a few devices over the course of the last few MSR builds, but never really brought it up before. Plus I don't rename devices too often. But I have a motion sensor right now that I renamed in Hubitat from "Office Motion" to "Living Room Motion" over 2 weeks week ago. Probably closer to 3 or 4 weeks now. I have restarted MSR several times since the rename, hard refreshed the browser, tried a different machine and different browser, and even an updated version of MSR. MSR is still showing the old name within the Entities section. I know I could rename it within MSR, but I would prefer to only have to rename devices in one location. I don't recall how long ago I started noticing this, which I know does not help at all.
-
The reason for my question is a rather long story involving a virtual thermostat on my Hubitat and using InfluxDB and Grafana to graph the state of the thermostat.
The TL;DR version is that it would be helpful if I could send MSR expressions (variables) to InfluxDB. I don't currently see any way to do that, and if it isn't a current capability of MSR it might be useful as a future enhancement.
Long version: I have a rule in MSR that runs every minute to pull the thermostat information from my thermostat's cloud API. I parse the response into global variables, and then update a Hubitat virtual thermostat when those global variables change. I added the x_hubitat_Thermostat entity, along with selected capabilities, to my reactor.yaml in the InfluxDB section, 'default_capabilities', so the changes to the virtual thermostat get logged into the db.
It's working OK except when the API reports that the temperature has reached the setpoint but the system is still operating. For example, in the morning when the heat is turned up, the temp will climb until the setpoint == the temperature, but the system will continue heating for a while afterwards. It's a variable speed/heat system so it continues to run at very low output for quite a while after the temps match.
The issue I'm having is that when the temperature matches the setpoint, the Hubitat virtual thermostat switches to idle mode on it's own, despite the fact that the API is still reporting heating mode. When the virtual device sees that the setpoint has been reached, it automatically changes to idle, which makes sense as that's how you'd want a real thermostat to work .
I am working around this by having the rule that updates the temperature on the virtual device also update the operatingState. This fixes it, but for just a few milliseconds the virtual thermostat switches to idle before the rule sets it back to heat, and that state change shows up in Grafana.
If I could just directly log changes to the expressions to InfluxDB I could avoid the issue and get the same data into the database. Also I can see other applications for something like this with other APIs where MSR and InfluxDB could be used to log data without having any virtual device entities involved.
-
Hey Patrick, had to switch over my HA VM from VirtualBox to VMware since VirtualBox stopped playing well. Anyways I updated the IP address to the new VM IP and deleted the Long Lived Access Token and created a new one just in case (copy pasted the new token into the config file). Tried rebooting both the HA machine and the MSR one too and MSR is still not connecting. The only thing I have not tried yet is creating another controller entry, but I am worried it may create all new entities for everything forcing me to redo all my logic. Here are some logs:
[latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:09.753Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:01.083Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:14.780Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:24.791Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.813Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.820Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.820Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out -
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed. -
Patrick,
I've just imported a large set of rules from Vera, and I had already played with creating rules in MSR that are mixed throughout the existing Vera rules. Is there any sort of way to "find/replace" in MSR, so I can find all matches to the old rules and replace them with the new ones? -
Patrick,
Yesterday I migrated a large luup Reactor group over from Vera to MSR, following the directions to importing it from Vera in the documentation. One of the odd things in the migration was the conditional rules for House Modes. Many of my rules had conditions such as "House Mode is any of Home, Night, or changes to Away.The way the import did it was changes from 1,3 to null. This importation did not seem to trigger rules correctly.
I was able to fix all the instances by creating multiple triggers in a group:
Entity Attribute: House Mode (vera>housemode) x_vera_housemode.mode contains home
OR Entity Attribute: House Mode (vera>housemode) x_vera_housemode.mode contains nightIs this what you are expecting in importation?
-
Good morning all,
This weekend I've been playing around with Home Assistant as a replacement (long term) for my aging Vera platform. I'm pretty amazed how much more capability it has. On the other hand, the sheer amount of variables it pulls in from devices is massive.In any case, I have added Google Calendar into Home Assistant for things like Federal Holidays and my daughter's school calendar. It connected to them without issue, which I had been having problems with in Vera an GCal3.
I connected MSR to Home Assistant, so I can start using some of the systems I've integrated into Home Assistant in MSR, and continue migrating my luup Reactor rules over to MSR. Now I'm trying to create a rule based on if today is a Federal Holiday or not. Reactor sees the calendar just fine, however, for whatever reason, it's not pulling data for today, but the next event, which in this case is Columbus day, three weeks away. The attribute that is pulling this is x_haas_attr.message.
I tested with my daughter's school calendar, and it did have an entry for today, and none of the other values seemed to be different, such as a "true" or something to tell me there is an entry.
a8478a6e-d8eb-4572-ac84-c94ff012a1ec-image.png
60632486-e80b-4f0f-aed9-dc67113689a4-image.png
ab04cd0f-f849-4e14-be7d-f4c00735da77-image.png
The only thing I've been able to come up with, is there is a start_time attribute, which shows the date as 2022-10-10 00:00:00
1cbe4526-7f63-4329-a088-b331f1d03376-image.png
The only thing I can think of is there might be a way to compare the current system date to that date, but I can't seem to figure that out in MSR.
Has anybody done this? Any suggestions?
-
I started kicking around the VEC last evening, was cut short, and dug in a bit more this morning.
My reactor.yaml:
d3df4d99-aa7f-4b8b-8fb9-5a6c615daad9-image.png
I verified the yaml is good at https://yamlchecker.com/
What I'm seeing in MSR:
0f89ce8e-7abe-4779-baca-43123e030cf4-image.png
87560ded-7dfa-4340-8585-8be58ff22852-image.png
I believe I have followed all steps (standard disclaimers apply).
Anyone else started to tinker with this newness and, if so, what were your results?
-
Having just embarrassed myself to @toggledbits by asserting that the latest release somehow had a bug when in reality it was surfacing underlying issues with my approach to building out my rulesets and automations I wanted to ask the collective for their feedback on how they've designed their rulesets.
For me, I built out a list of Global Reactions that I commonly use. For instance, for mode changes I typically change the mode entity and write that mode to a variable for some future use. When building out a ruleset I just pull in that Global Reaction vs manually recreating the entity list as my ruleset Reaction. Example, for lighting:
270bbe18-9680-491d-81d4-20308a9fe63c-image.png
Each of these contains the appropriate group of lights to turn on/off, etc.
I also have what I've dubbed my "Armed for..." rulesets. These are rulesets that can be referenced as true or false in other rulesets. Example, for my various lighting configurations in and out of the house I have these:
0d9f55d4-5d5d-42e2-a83c-8afa95df08fb-image.png
I think this is resulting in reactions stomping on other reactions creating race conditions that result in things looking like they're working when, in reality, they're one restart away from disaster.
So how are you all designing your superstructure, if you will, at a high level?
-
Maybe more of a cosmetic issue, but certain entities could be hidden from entity actions as you cannot set any meaningful action? See Vera as an example:
Screenshot 2022-09-16 at 15.11.29.png
vera>system is then obviously a different story and should be there
-
Hi @toggledbits,
I have a bridge consuming Vera's variable using the MQTTController in MSR, and I've noticed that after I've updated to the latest version (22257), some variables are not echoed. I've already tried to reboot MSR, with no luck.
These variables are under urn:smarthome-community:serverId:Vacuum
0fe837ed-3a29-4d5d-a06c-445981d44e13-image.png
A trace via MQTT explorer:
cf919028-4f7b-4761-b99a-c3943945704a-image.pngMy config has just exclude_capabilities: [] and it was working OK before the latest build. Even /query command doesn't seem to retrieve all the attributes. The values are retrieved correctly from the Vera controller, and I could use them in MSR, they're just not echoed to the bridge. Thanks!
-
Good morning all,
I"m working on converting my luup Reactor scenes over to MSR, so I can eventually introduce an Ezlo plus into the mix and not loose all the work I've done with Reactor. If nothing else, this should free up some resources on my aging Vera Plus, and maybe speed up some functions. Maybe that's just wishful thinking.In any case, I'm moving move my first Reactor set, which is a set of rules to control the blilnds/window coverings in my home. I have two types of blinds:
iBlinds retrofit motors (IB2.1-ZWx) version from late 2019.
Bali roman shades with factory installed Somfy CSZ1 Z-wave motors.I'm setting up reactions for both types of window coverings. One of the problems I always had in Vera was with iBlinds, I had to do it by luup commands:
luup.call_action("urn:upnp-org:serviceId:Dimming1","SetLoadLevelTarget",{ newLoadlevelTarget="50" },316)The reason for this, is that the open position was 100%, and the close position was 0%. In other words, the blinds were closed one way 100% an closed 100% the other way. I've been informed by iBlinds support that even in Ezlo, they still do it this way, which is different than most other Z-wave controller manufacturers. I'm not sure how the others do it, but some how "open" is right in the middle (50%).
So, in MSR, i can still set the Dimming1.SetLoadLevelTarget to 50, but I also noticed some other commands I haven't seen before in Reactor
3cdeeb89-5986-45bc-8a3b-79067050a22c-image.png
Is there some way in MSR to set that middle value to 50% so I can use cover.open? The command cover.close works as expected, so I'm wondering how I might use that cover.set.
Thanks for any advise.
-
I configured OWM Weather on MSR (latest-22257-dd9b9271), created an account with OWM, generated an API key, put the key in the yaml file, and I’ve waited over a day now. OWM Weather shows as up on the the Controller Status widget.
I’ve tried to create a trigger or constraint to use the data, and nothing is really showing up.
5B8611C1-33D0-4D3C-B507-7383CB81E25A.jpeg
I only have a free subscription with OWM, but I was expecting some data.
Is this expected behavior (i.e., still in development), or do I do more configuration other than the .yaml file?’
I still am able to pull Weather data through Dark Sky in my Vera plus controller, however, I know that will no longer work at some point.
-
Was just looking at the new metadata stuff in Entities for a lamp. I was on the dimming.level attritube and I then changed the dim level of the lamp several times and some how I got all these windows.
I then selected a different attribute color_temperature.value and that window was then shown over the top of all the others.
267e6d0d-7245-4816-ac93-ac83cfda509e-image.png
I don't know how to close these windows down ?
b09fd5f1-fffe-40c2-8ba6-8cffacd1e28b-image.png
Thanks
-
Hey Patrick, similar to R4V it would be nice if we could set the max amount of time a condition pulses. Currently in MSR you can only set it to pulse once or repeat continually until the condition goes false.
I currently have a rule that pings dead devices and occasionally the dead device needs a few pings for it to come back alive but I don't want it to keep pinging forever if the device is actually not functioning.
-
Hi
Anyone else been having issues with the MSR web UI not connecting after a period of time? Or is it just me?
If I reboot the Linux Debian box then MSR starts working again and I can open the web UI and it says connected.
However after sometime I then cannot later connect to the web GUI. It just says connecting all the time.
I also have Node-Red and HA Bridge running on the same box and I can connect to those two fine still.
Thanks
-
Is is possible for MSR to show newly detected ZwaveJS devices in the current alerts windows like Hubitat and HA? New devices show in the Entities but there is not an alert.
-
Hi Patrick,
For as long as I can remember, I have red x's instead of icons in MSR.05f25684-b338-4f69-8d0a-8a482a9fe1a2-image.png
I am running MSR in Docker and am on version 22252. If hosted in the cloud, they could be getting blocked by pihole.
Thanks,
Roger -
TLDR: I'm getting an alert saying I have to edit and re-save a rule containing a HTTP POST request in order to update it, but following the instructions in the alert doesn't seem to fix the issue.
I am receiving this message in the Current Alerts when sending a HTTP POST request.
The action at step 1 of "Send Notification Reaction" (re-I7yq7e15) needs to be edited to update it to the latest stored form. The action will continue, but should be updated as soon as possible, before this form is deprecated and no longer functions. Just make a trivial edit to the "headers" argument and then save the reaction to update it.
Details:
I am using a self-hosted notification system - Gotify. Many of my rules use a HTTP POST action to send a notification through this system. The message contains a JSON body with the title, body, and message priority. It is posted to a URL on my LAN where the Gotify server resides.
When I updated to latest-22252-65e94b36 I started to receive the above error. Since I had the http request in many rules I took the opportunity to simplify things by moving the http request to a Reaction in the Reactions section of MSR. I created two variables to pass the notification content to the Reaction and now send all notifications via the one Reaction. Each rule that needs to send a reaction sets the variable values and then runs the Reaction.
For example, this rule runs if the Kitchen Main leak sensor detects a leak. It sets the variable "g_gotify_token" to a value (this is used as part of the URL when making the HTTP request) and sets "g_gotify"body" to a JSON formatted string. In this case that string is
{ "title":"Water Alert", "message": "Kitchen Main Leak Sensor Tripped", "priority": 8 }Finally, the rule runs the Reaction "Send Notification Reaction"
79fd4034-c611-4173-b4e4-18cf5091b453-image.png
That reaction contains the http request. It uses the variables in the URL and request body fields. The request headers field is static and is set to "Content-Type: application/json"
d75d9305-a5ab-4401-9b75-ea72d08787fa-image.png
I get the same error when I directly call the HTTP request from a rule without using any variables. Either way, the notification goes through successfully. The only issue is the alert being raised in MSR.
I tried editing and re-saving the Reaction, and also tried creating an entirely new reaction. I get the same warning message either way.
footnote: Because I use the same process to send a notification whenever there is an alert raised in MSR, this also created a loop (that thankfully got throttled pretty quickly) where the system was making the http request to send a notification that this alert had been raised, and the action of sending that notification raised the alert again... etc...
Is this just a bug? Am I missing something about the request format that needs to be updated? I checked the manual and this forum for answers, but didn't find anything that looked relevant.
-
I use a number of multistring devices in my vera plus. My 'original' multistring devices work in Reactor i.e.:
9c5203dd-1993-4b5b-aeee-44377c1ee1c5-image.png
42b97524-9428-4222-a3fb-ce4e0009c00b-image.png
However, the new ones I have added do not show the device data sets / parameters (not sure what the correct term is?):
a54ddf29-ea32-47c9-906e-260a25dcb482-image.png
3efa1d0a-5466-4220-93d3-0a67da42a5d0-image.png
Is there something that I am doing wrong?
Reactor not showing full vera device parameters
-
I use a number of multistring devices in my vera plus. My 'original' multistring devices work in Reactor i.e.:
However, the new ones I have added do not show the device data sets / parameters (not sure what the correct term is?):
Is there something that I am doing wrong?
-
Did you restart Reactor after making the changes on the Vera, and also hard refresh your browser?
-
Yes Patrick. I also tried an alternative browser. Tried a hard re-boot also on my Pi4.
-
Unfortunately I can't see your screen shots, they're too small (basically same size as thumbnail when reading, for whatever reason). But that's probably not useful or conclusive anyway. I would look at the attributes listed for the entities in the Entities list. VeraController just copies whatever it gets for state variables from the Vera to extended attributes, so if they are not listed there, it seems they may not be coming over for whatever reason, or there was an error trying to process them for some reason (I assume you looked in the logs for errors and didn't mention any because you didn't find any? They would occur during the initialization phase after startup). You can also check the
vera-user_data-initial.jsonandvera-status-initial.jsonfiles to see exactly what the Vera sent to Reactor for states. They should be listed there. -
Please find my responses below. I fear you may be frustraited by my lack of knowlege but I have done my best based on your guidance. I am not able to upload the logs. Do you need these?
Sorry about the thumbnail screen shots - I could not find a better way to capture them!
'I would look at the attributes listed for the entities in the Entities list.' So the unreadable thumbnail images showed that the expected entities for the two new vera multistring devices are not available in Reactor.
I have looked at the vera logs (http://192.168.XX.XXX/cgi-bin/cmh/log.sh?Device=LuaUPnP after a luup reload. If I search for the two new multistring devices (1056 & 1057) the entries looked quite normal compared to the log entries for similar devices. So I assume no vera error?
I have looked at the two Reactor logs (vera-user_data-initial.json and vera-status-initial.json files) again, comparing the entries for 1056 and 1057 against other devices, the respective lines don't seem out of place. All entities are listed for the two multistring devices.
Vera plus user. MSR user on Raspberry PI 4. Running MSR version 22252
-
Entities are (in effect) devices. Attributes are values (like state variables on a device). It sounds like you're missing attributes. The logs I want you to look at are the Reactor logs.
-
Hi Patrick,
I don't know if this might be related, but I just saw something strange with a missing attribute as well. It looks like after the last update the Schlage lock attribute on Vera systems lost:
x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_DoorLock1.sl_UserCode_updated
(missing) is after it when looking in rule>entities>triggers.
Something just came up at work as I was writing this, so I'll look through the logs when I am freed up.
-
False alarm with both work and MSR. I went back to look and it cleared up on it's own.
-
@toggledbits it appears that I used the wrong terminology. I have looked at the two Reactor logs (vera-user_data-initial.json and vera-status-initial.json files) again, comparing the attributes for 1056 and 1057 against other devices, the respective attributes don't seem out of place. All attributes are listed for the two multistring devices (or should I say they appear to be listed). See below for device 1056. Does this confirm that the attributes for the two new entities (devices) are being read correctly by reactor?
vera-status-initial.json
{
"id": 1056,
"states": [
{
"id": 334,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName1",
"value": "Y'day Gas kWh"
},
{
"id": 335,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable1",
"value": "99"
},
{
"id": 336,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName2",
"value": "V2"
},
{
"id": 337,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable2",
"value": "0"
},
{
"id": 338,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName3",
"value": "V3"
},
{
"id": 339,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable3",
"value": "0"
},
{
"id": 340,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName4",
"value": "V4"
},
{
"id": 341,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable4",
"value": "0"
},
{
"id": 342,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName5",
"value": "V5"
},
{
"id": 343,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable5",
"value": "0"
},
{
"id": 344,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Options",
"value": ""
},
{
"id": 345,
"service": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1",
"variable": "Configured",
"value": "0"
}vera-user_data-initial.json:
{
"id": 1056,
"device_type": "urn:schemas-upnp-org:device:VContainer:1",
"id_parent": 0,
"embedded": 0,
"disabled": 0,
"device_file": "D_MString.xml",
"manufacturer": "",
"model": "",
"altid": "",
"ip": "",
"mac": "",
"time_created": "1662320801",
"plugin": "8231",
"states": [
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName1",
"value": "Y'day Gas kWh",
"id": 0
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable1",
"value": "99",
"id": 1
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName2",
"value": "V2",
"id": 2
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable2",
"value": "0",
"id": 3
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName3",
"value": "V3",
"id": 4
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable3",
"value": "0",
"id": 5
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName4",
"value": "V4",
"id": 6
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable4",
"value": "0",
"id": 7
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName5",
"value": "V5",
"id": 8
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable5",
"value": "0",
"id": 9
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Options",
"value": "",
"id": 10
}
],
"impl_file": "I_MString.xml",
"ControlURLs": {
"service_514": {
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"ControlURL": "/upnp/control/dev_514",
"EventURL": "/upnp/event/dev_514",
"serviceType": "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:VContainer:1"
}
},
"device_json": "D_MString.json",
"name": "Gas_Params",
"room": "11",
"local_udn": "uuid:4d494342-5342-5645-0420-000002fc93e7"
}, -
OK. But in all your screen shots, you are showing actions not state variables or conditions trying to use state variables. The state variables will not be listed in actions. You're mixing up so much terminology that I'm not sure of what you're looking for or what you're trying to do.
Maybe a good start would be to have you review the Concepts and Terminology page of the documentation, then try to describe again what you are trying to do and what you are not getting that you expect. I'm lost.
-
I have a number of rules which using entity actions I write values into multistring devices in my vera plus. Below is an example of how I do this in Reactor:
If I add a new multistring device in my vera plus I cannot set the device variables as I can with 'old' multistring devices. The below screen shot shows that the same drop down menu options in reactor for the new multistring device are not present as they are for the old device above:
If I look at the reactor entities for an old multistring entity (device #887) and a newly created multistring entity (device number '1056) I can spot a difference as per the screen shot below. I guess my question is 'why are the available actions not listed for new multistring devices (entities))?
-
OK. I'm seeing some clarity now.
It looks like Gas Params may be misconfigured on the Vera. I would compare the settings in the control panel Advanced > Params for device 887 and 1056 and see if you spot a difference. If I had to guess, I'd say that the name of the
device_fileis incorrect on 1056. I don't know how you create new devices in MultiString, since I don't use the thing, but it seems it went wrong at that step.Edit: if they seem identical, then it's possible that VeraController received an update while the device was being created, and it was in an intermediate state (there's no way for VeraController to know). Try deleting the entity in Reactor using the DELETE button in the entity detail (in the entity on the Entities page). Then restart Reactor and let it recreate the entity from scratch (you'll need to hard refresh your browser as well).
-
So, I have found my missing parameters! They appeared following a reactor update. Perhaps next time I add new vera devices, I should stop reactor and re-start it after I have added the new devices and things have settled down. Anyhow, thanks again for your assitance Patrick.
