Good morning,
I have a service MQTT service that needs a restart occasionally. The add-on (Smartbed MQTT) is for the smart bed base for my bed. It has a "safety light" that I can control from HAAS & MSR as a light entity, and also moves the head of the bed to a preset at bedtime, and then lies it back flat in the morning The problem is, from time to time, the light becomes "unavailable" Restarting from the Add-ons tab in HAAS always fixes it, but I should be able to detect when it happens when "light.tempur_pedic_safety_lights" is not true or false, i.e., unavailable.
What I don't know how to do is how to restart that service. Does anybody have experience in restarting add-ons from MSR?
Running:
Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-24212-3ce15e25 ZWaveJSController [0.1.24232]HAAS:
RPi5-64 (8GB) Core 2024.7.3 Supervisor 2024.08.0 Operating System 13.0 Frontend 20240710.0
Hi!
Is it possible to generate two additional log files, the first being the replica of what is displayed on screen by the Rule History widgets and the other with Recently Changed Entities?
And could I configure the generation of one file per day, and delete the older ones? For example, store the last 5 days?
And being more ambitious, does Windget have an icon to open these TXT files in the navigated?
Well, we're approaching Christmas, so here's my request to Santa Claus @toggledbits 🙂
Hi @toggledbits
I'm working on a controller to generate llm response from a prompt in reactor. I have http response coming thru an http request action at the moment, capturing the response inside a local variable. So, it's practically sync.
I want to create a controller, so I don't have to rely on a proxy (and have a simpler architecture), and duplicate absurd http actions, but AFAIK in the current implementation, actions are async only. But if I have multiple requests going on, I cannot be sure what it's really inside an attribute. I also thought that something like a correlation id when sending the request could be used to identity multiple responses, but I wanted to double check with you before starting with something too complicated. I also noticed that some actions in home assistant (ie forecast) are sync and I'm wondering if you have any plan or hint to address this situation. Thanks.
Thanks.
@togglebits I am curious as to why the tilt_sensor.state (primary) = NULL. I believe it should show true or false. I have to use binary_sensor.state instead in my rules.
Again, not sure if this is related to Reactor/ZwaveJSController implementation or the actual Z-Wave JS UI docker version. I have copied, below, the attributes of the tilt sensor in hopes it can help.
Thanks in advance.
Reactor version 23302
ZWaveJSController version 23254
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.3.0.724519f
zwave-js version 12.2.3
@toggledbits I have noticed after upgrading both Reactor and ZWaveJSController to version 24257 that two of my devices/entities, TILT-ZWAVE2.5-ECO and Zooz ZSE18, had their entity re-named in an unusual way and also appears to be duplicated.
Reactor version 24257
ZWaveJSController version 24257
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.18.1
zwave-js version 13.2.0
Vestibule Motion Sensor State attributes/partial screenshot of entities it created. All entities have the same attributes.
motion_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Home_Security_Motion_sensor_status=8 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=23 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Home Security","Home Security","Motion sensor status","Motion sensor status"] zwave_device.version_info=nullTilt Sensor Door State and Tilt Sensor Door State Simple attributes/partial screenshot of entities it created. All entities have similar attributes with exception of x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_State = 22 or 23.
tilt_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=22 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state","Door state"] zwave_device.version_info=null tilt_sensor.state=true x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=22 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state (simple)","Door state (simple)"] zwave_device.version_info=null tilt_sensor.state=false x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=23 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state","Door state"] zwave_device.version_info=null tilt_sensor.state=false x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=23 zwave_device.capabilities=[113] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=24 zwave_device.valueId=[113,"Notification","Access Control","Access Control","Door state (simple)","Door state (simple)"] zwave_device.version_info=nullI'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only).
Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package:
GitHub - dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib: Contrib MQTT templates for Reactor
GitHub - dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib: Contrib MQTT templates for Reactor
Contrib MQTT templates for Reactor. Contribute to dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib development by creating an account on GitHub.
Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go.
I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them.
The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression.
Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests 🙂
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.Hi @toggledbits.
After a couple of weeks, I noticed that my Remotec zrc90 isn't working as expected.
Scenes are working in ZWaveJS, but this device has a strange behavior: the scene change, but then it's set again to null. In Reactor, this remains null:
battery_power.level=0.7 battery_power.since=1725817957361 x_debug.dt={"description":"Scene master 8 button remote","model":"BW8510/ZRC-90US","default_name":"Scene master 8 button remote","manufacturerId":21076,"productType":0,"productId":34064} x_zwave_values.Battery_isLow=false x_zwave_values.Battery_level=70 x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_scene_001=null x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_scene_002=null x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_scene_003=null x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_scene_004=null x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_scene_005=null x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_scene_006=null x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_scene_007=null x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_scene_008=null x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_slowRefresh=null x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=21076 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=34064 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=1 x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["1.1","1.1"] x_zwave_values.Version_hardwareVersion=3 x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=2 x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="4.5" x_zwave_values.Wake_Up_controllerNodeId=1 x_zwave_values.Wake_Up_wakeUpInterval=0 zwave_device.capabilities=[91,114,128,132,134] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=false zwave_device.generic_class="Remote Controller" zwave_device.impl_sig="24242:1:22315:1" zwave_device.is_beaming=false zwave_device.is_listening=false zwave_device.is_routing=false zwave_device.is_secure=false zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[21076,1,34064] zwave_device.max_data_rate=null zwave_device.node_id=154 zwave_device.specific_class="Simple Remote Control" zwave_device.status=2 zwave_device.status_text="awake" zwave_device.version_info=[null,"1.1"] zwave_device.wakeup_interval=0Anything I could look at? Thanks.
Hi, @toggledbits!
I have a question about the execution behavior. See the code below, and I'll explain the situation.
12957c3e-ff06-46c9-929d-b53f936665df-image.png
This is a routine that, at a certain point, determines that the desktop on which the VM hosting the Reactor is located receives an instruction to perform a shutdown (Shell Command).
When this happens, the desktop is turned off, and then Hubitat detects by a "ping" that the VM has been down, waits 15 seconds, turns off the power to this desktop, and then 15 seconds later turns on the desktop with the Reactor VM again.
After restarting the desktop, the VM is loaded, and the Reactor is triggered. Still, the following problem occurs: I expected that when the rule was continued to be executed again, the next step would be executed, that of the 900-second delay after shutdown, but the Shell command is executed again, and then it goes into a loop, the rule does not advance.
To break the loop, I first have to make the VM not load, change the desktop password, and then start the VM. In this case, Reactor generates an error when trying to execute the Shell Command because of the invalid password and then finishes the routine following the 900 delay step.
b58b0d4a-d6c1-4fe3-bab7-4222acea9607-image.png
Is my interpretation that when it returns, the routine should continue to the next step that has not yet been executed incorrectly? Or does Reactor, through the shutdown command, interpret that it hasn't finished this step and keep trying, which is the correct reaction?
Thanks for clarifying.
Hi @toggledbits ,
I'm slowly moving my ZWave network from Vera to ZWaveJS. I successfully cloned my ZWave network using a spare Vera Edge (a new post for the community later when I'll be fully back from vacation) and I'm testing a couple of things before moving everything to ZWaveJS.
In the meanwhile, I have a couple of venetian blinds connected to Fibaro Roller Shutters 2 (FGR222) and I'm using some proprietary ZWave commands to control the tilt position, that right now I'm sending via Vera (with some code from the old place, messing with this):
af7f883c-f49e-419c-a2fe-8669572e3792-image.png
The ZWaveJS values are reported via this:
x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Proprietary_fibaro_venetianBlindsPosition=0 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Proprietary_fibaro_venetianBlindsTilt=0I hope there's a way to expose a separate device to control the tilt position directly, without doing the mess I'm doing now. Let me know if you need some files. Thanks.
As per @toggledbits request, new topic.
Position and cover commands not working and position/cover attributes are incorrect. Dimming is OK.
cover.state=null dimming.level=1 dimming.step=0.1 energy_sensor.units="kWh" energy_sensor.value=0.41 position.value=null power_sensor.units="W" power_sensor.value=0 power_switch.state=true x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Cover","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=17;deviceClass.specific.key=6","capabilities":["cover","toggle","position"],"primary_attribute":"cover.state"} x_zwave_values.Meter_reset=null x_zwave_values.Meter_value_65537=0.41 x_zwave_values.Meter_value_66049=0 x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_Down=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_Up=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_currentValue=99 x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_duration="unknown" x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_restorePrevious=null x_zwave_values.Multilevel_Switch_targetValue=99 x_zwave_values.Notification_Power_Management_Over_current_status=0 x_zwave_values.Notification_System_Hardware_status=0 x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmLevel=null x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmType=null zwave_device.capabilities=[38,50,113] zwave_device.endpoint=1 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.impl_sig="24225:1:22315:1" zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=148 zwave_device.version_info=nullThanks!
Another one for you, @toggledbits.
I have two water sensors (same device, NAS-WS01Z), but one is reporting leak_detector.state=true even if no alarm is detected (I double checked from ZWaveJS UI):
battery_power.level=0.86 battery_power.since=null leak_detector.state=true x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Notification Sensor","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=7"} x_zwave_values.Battery_isLow=false x_zwave_values.Battery_level=86 x_zwave_values.Binary_Sensor_Water=false x_zwave_values.Configuration_Alarm_Activity_Duration=5 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Alarm_Beep=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Alarm_Duration=120 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Alarm_Interval=null x_zwave_values.Configuration_Basic_Set_Level=255 x_zwave_values.Configuration_First_Alarm_Activity_Duration=null x_zwave_values.Configuration_Water_Detection=1 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=600 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=4229 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=3 x_zwave_values.Notification_Water_Alarm_Sensor_status=null x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmLevel=0 x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmType=0 x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=null x_zwave_values.Version_hardwareVersion=null x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=null x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion=null x_zwave_values.Wake_Up_controllerNodeId=1 x_zwave_values.Wake_Up_wakeUpInterval=43200 zwave_device.capabilities=[48,112,113,114,128,132,134] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=false zwave_device.generic_class="Notification Sensor" zwave_device.impl_sig="24225:1:22315:1" zwave_device.is_beaming=false zwave_device.is_listening=false zwave_device.is_routing=true zwave_device.is_secure=false zwave_device.last_wakeup=1724143899220 zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[600,3,4229] zwave_device.max_data_rate=null zwave_device.node_id=114 zwave_device.specific_class="Notification Sensor" zwave_device.status=1 zwave_device.status_text="asleep" zwave_device.version_info=[null,null] zwave_device.wakeup_interval=43200here's the other one, correctly report the leak status:
battery_power.level=1 battery_power.since=null leak_detector.state=false x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Notification Sensor","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=7"} x_zwave_values.Battery_isLow=false x_zwave_values.Battery_level=100 x_zwave_values.Binary_Sensor_Water=false x_zwave_values.Configuration_Alarm_Activity_Duration=5 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Alarm_Beep=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Alarm_Duration=120 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Alarm_Interval=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Basic_Set_Level=255 x_zwave_values.Configuration_First_Alarm_Activity_Duration=60 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Water_Detection=1 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=600 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=4229 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=3 x_zwave_values.Notification_Water_Alarm_Sensor_status=0 x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmLevel=null x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmType=null x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["2.54"] x_zwave_values.Version_hardwareVersion=48 x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=6 x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="4.5" x_zwave_values.Wake_Up_controllerNodeId=1 x_zwave_values.Wake_Up_wakeUpInterval=43200 zwave_device.capabilities=[48,112,113,114,128,132,134] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=false zwave_device.generic_class="Notification Sensor" zwave_device.impl_sig="24225:1:22315:1" zwave_device.is_beaming=false zwave_device.is_listening=false zwave_device.is_routing=true zwave_device.is_secure=false zwave_device.last_wakeup=1724105239533 zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[600,3,4229] zwave_device.max_data_rate=null zwave_device.node_id=113 zwave_device.specific_class="Notification Sensor" zwave_device.status=1 zwave_device.status_text="asleep" zwave_device.version_info=[null,"2.54"] zwave_device.wakeup_interval=43200Also, both seems to have no primary value. Thanks.
Hi-
I have an android media player entity publishing from HA. I watch for changes in transport state and media title to trigger some actions.
Though those attributes report as expected, the set rule is being throttled for possible flapping.
There is an attribute for media position that continually updates, I suspect it is causing the evaluations to run constantly.
The workaround I am seeking is to ignore those attributes in HA or MSR. Anyone know how, or have a better idea??
Thx
Btw- this problem has spanned versions of HA and reactor, but I am current on both. Too current on HA for transparency, but the issue has survived several updates.
Referencing an expression inside a reaction is in the form of ${{ expression }}. When referenced inside my shell command to set the watering delay duration for my Rachio sprinkler system, it just does not work.
If I enter "86400" instead of referencing the expression lWateringDelayDuration, it works. Either I am doing something wrong or referencing an expression inside a shell command is not supported.
Reactor version: 24212
Local Expression
lWateringDelayDuration =
Setting Reaction using Shell command
curl -X PUT -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer xxxxxxxxxx -d '{ "id" : "xxxxxxxxxx", "duration" : ${{ lWateringDelayDuration}} }' https://api.rach.io/1/public/device/rain_delayThanks in advance
As per @toggledbits request, here's a new topic.
My Fibaro Door Window Sensor 2 (FGDW002) is always reporting as open, even if
x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state=23 x_zwave_values.Notification_Access_Control_Door_state_simple=23which means that the door is closed. It was working before and I could downgrade to test, if necessary. Thanks.
Hi @toggledbits,
I'm not sure if it's a bug or something, but I have a lot of Fibaro Double Switch (FGS223) as follows.
In the example, it's zwavejs>65-2:
energy_sensor.units="kWh" energy_sensor.value=0.21 power_sensor.units="W" power_sensor.value=0 power_switch.state=false x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Switch","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=16","capabilities":["power_switch","toggle"],"primary_attribute":"power_switch.state"} x_zwave_values.Binary_Switch_currentValue=false x_zwave_values.Binary_Switch_targetValue=false x_zwave_values.Meter_reset=null x_zwave_values.Meter_value_65537=0.21 x_zwave_values.Meter_value_66049=0 zwave_device.capabilities=[37,50] zwave_device.endpoint=2 zwave_device.failed=null zwave_device.impl_sig="23326:1:22315:1" zwave_device.manufacturer_info=null zwave_device.node_id=65 zwave_device.version_info=nullWhen operating endpoint 2, it's triggered endpoint 1. Endpoint 1 is fine. This is causing a lot of troubles, as you may imagine.
Also, endpoint 0 is not really a switch, and the associated actions are not doing anything at all. Maybe these could be removed. Also, I see battery_maintenance and power_source capabilities, all with null values.
battery_maintenance.charging=null battery_maintenance.rechargeable=false battery_maintenance.replace=false battery_maintenance.state=null heat_detector.state=false power_source.source=null power_switch.state=null x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Switch","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=16","capabilities":["power_switch","toggle"],"primary_attribute":"power_switch.state","description":"Double Switch 2","model":"FGS223","default_name":"Double Switch 2","manufacturerId":271,"productType":515,"productId":4096} x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_scene_001=null x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_scene_002=null x_zwave_values.Central_Scene_slowRefresh=null x_zwave_values.Configuration_First_Channel_Energy_Reports_Threshold=100 x_zwave_values.Configuration_First_Channel_Operating_Mode=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_First_Channel_Power_Reports_Minimum_Time_Between_Reports=10 x_zwave_values.Configuration_First_Channel_Power_Reports_Threshold=20 x_zwave_values.Configuration_First_Channel_Pulse_Time_for_Blink_Mode=5 x_zwave_values.Configuration_First_Channel_Reaction_to_Key_S1_for_Delay_Auto_ON_OFF_Modes=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_First_Channel_Time_Parameter_for_Delay_Auto_ON_OFF_Modes=50 x_zwave_values.Configuration_General_Purpose_Alarm_Response=3 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Include_Consumption_By_Device_Itself_in_Reports=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Input_Button_Switch_Configuration=2 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Associations_Double_Click_Value_Sent=99 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Associations_Send_OFF_With_Single_Click_2=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Associations_Send_ON_With_Single_Click_1=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Associations_Send_When_Double_Clicking_8=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Associations_Send_When_Holding_and_Releasing_4=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Associations_Switch_OFF_Value_Sent=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Associations_Switch_ON_Value_Sent=255 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Send_Scenes_When_Held_Down_and_Released_8=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Send_Scenes_When_Pressed_1_Time_1=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Send_Scenes_When_Pressed_2_Times_2=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S1_Send_Scenes_When_Pressed_3_Times_4=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Associations_Double_Click_Value_Sent=99 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Associations_Send_OFF_With_Single_Click_2=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Associations_Send_ON_With_Single_Click_1=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Associations_Send_When_Double_Clicking_8=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Associations_Send_When_Holding_and_Releasing_4=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Associations_Switch_OFF_Value_Sent=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Associations_Switch_ON_Value_Sent=255 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Send_Scenes_When_Held_Down_and_Released_8=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Send_Scenes_When_Pressed_1_Time_1=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Send_Scenes_When_Pressed_2_Times_2=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Key_S2_Send_Scenes_When_Pressed_3_Times_4=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Periodic_Active_Power_Reports=3600 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Periodic_Energy_Reports=3600 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Report_During_Blink_Mode=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Second_Channel_Energy_Reports_Threshold=100 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Second_Channel_Operating_Mode=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Second_Channel_Power_Reports_Minimum_Time_Between_Reports=10 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Second_Channel_Power_Reports_Threshold=20 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Second_Channel_Pulse_Time_for_Blink_Mode=5 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Second_Channel_Reaction_to_Key_S2_for_Delay_Auto_ON_OFF_Modes=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Second_Channel_Time_Parameter_for_Delay_Auto_ON_OFF_Modes=50 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Send_Secure_Commands_to_2nd_Association_Group_1=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Send_Secure_Commands_to_3rd_Association_Group_2=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Send_Secure_Commands_to_4th_Association_Group_4=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Send_Secure_Commands_to_5th_Association_Group_8=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Smoke_CO_or_CO2_Alarm_Response=3 x_zwave_values.Configuration_State_After_Power_Failure=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Temperature_Alarm_Response=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Time_of_Alarm_State=600 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Water_Flood_Alarm_Response=2 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=271 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=4096 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=515 x_zwave_values.Notification_Heat_Alarm_Heat_sensor_status=0 x_zwave_values.Notification_Power_Management_Over_current_status=0 x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmLevel=null x_zwave_values.Notification_alarmType=null x_zwave_values.Protection_exclusiveControlNodeId=null x_zwave_values.Protection_local=0 x_zwave_values.Protection_rf=0 x_zwave_values.Protection_timeout=null x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["3.2"] x_zwave_values.Version_hardwareVersion=3 x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=3 x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="4.5" zwave_device.capabilities=[91,112,113,114,117,134] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=false zwave_device.generic_class="Binary Switch" zwave_device.impl_sig="23326:1:22315:1" zwave_device.is_beaming=false zwave_device.is_listening=true zwave_device.is_routing=true zwave_device.is_secure=false zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[271,515,4096] zwave_device.max_data_rate=null zwave_device.node_id=65 zwave_device.specific_class="Binary Power Switch" zwave_device.status=4 zwave_device.status_text="alive" zwave_device.version_info=[null,"3.2"]Thanks.
Good morning,
I'm having an issue with controlling my Zooz Zen14 outdoor double outlet. I should be able to control each outlet individually, and this does work when use Home Assistant (haas) from Reactor.
When I use zwavejs, I see 3 entries:
8305eccf-a99e-421f-ad18-1f08da9c8c9c-image.png
The first entry is for the overall device. I can turn both outlets on and off (in theory) by setting the power_switch state to on or off. This does turn them on and off when using zwavejs.
When I go to the individual outlets, performing the power_switch.on or power_switch.off actions turns them all (main, 1 and 2) on or off, and not just the individual outlets. When I perform the same action from haas, turning on outlet 1 will turn on the main switch and 1, but not 2.
I reviewed the logs for that node and I'm not seeing anything obvious.
:~/reactor/logs$ cat reactor.log.1 | grep ZWaveJSController#zwavejs | grep "node 216" [latest-24212]2024-08-07T00:19:00.233Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 216 value "0:37:targetValue:" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 216, "args": { "commandClassName": "Binary Switch", "commandClass": 37, "endpoint": 0, "property": "targetValue", "newValue": true, "prevValue": false, "propertyName": "targetValue" } } [latest-24212]2024-08-07T00:19:00.235Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 216 value "0:37:currentValue:" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 216, "args": { "commandClassName": "Binary Switch", "commandClass": 37, "property": "currentValue", "endpoint": 0, "newValue": true, "prevValue": false, "propertyName": "currentValue" } } [latest-24212]2024-08-07T00:19:00.321Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 216 value "0:37:currentValue:" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 216, "args": { "commandClassName": "Binary Switch", "commandClass": 37, "property": "currentValue", "endpoint": 0, "newValue": true, "prevValue": true, "propertyName": "currentValue" } } [latest-24212]2024-08-07T00:19:00.322Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 216 value "0:37:targetValue:" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 216, "args": { "commandClassName": "Binary Switch", "commandClass": 37, "property": "targetValue", "endpoint": 0, "newValue": true, "prevValue": true, "propertyName": "targetValue" } } [latest-24212]2024-08-07T00:19:00.323Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 216 value "0:37:duration:" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 216, "args": { "commandClassName": "Binary Switch", "commandClass": 37, "property": "duration", "endpoint": 0, "newValue": { "value": 0, "unit": "seconds" }, "prevValue": { "value": 0, "unit": "seconds" }, "propertyName": "duration" } } [latest-24212]2024-08-07T00:19:02.189Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 216 value "1:37:currentValue:" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 216, "args": { "commandClassName": "Binary Switch", "commandClass": 37, "property": "currentValue", "endpoint": 1, "newValue": true, "prevValue": false, "propertyName": "currentValue" } } [latest-24212]2024-08-07T00:19:02.192Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 216 value "1:37:targetValue:" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 216, "args": { "commandClassName": "Binary Switch", "commandClass": 37, "property": "targetValue", "endpoint": 1, "newValue": true, "prevValue": false, "propertyName": "targetValue" } } [latest-24212]2024-08-07T00:19:02.193Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 216 value "1:37:duration:" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 216, "args": { "commandClassName": "Binary Switch", "commandClass": 37, "property": "duration", "endpoint": 1, "newValue": { "value": 0, "unit": "seconds" }, "prevValue": { "value": 0, "unit": "seconds" }, "propertyName": "duration" } } [latest-24212]2024-08-07T05:32:30.127Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 216 endpoint 0 (entity "216-0") [latest-24212]2024-08-07T05:32:30.127Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 216 endpoint 1 (entity "216-1") [latest-24212]2024-08-07T05:32:30.128Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs configuring node 216 endpoint 2 (entity "216-2")I'm running:
Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-24212-3ce15e25
ZWaveJSController [0.1.23326] (with zwavejs_data from 7/25/2024)
HA:
Core 2024.7.3
Supervisor 2024.08.0
Operating System 12.3
Frontend 20240710.0
[Solved] latest-22328 restart fails
-
Solution: An update to openLuups MQTT implementation on handling acknowledge packets for QoS > 0 solved this issue.
EDIT: Seems related to any restart without any configuration changes. If I revert to 22310 I can restart Reactor from UI and with systemd within seconds, but with 22328 it fails to restart., both from UI and systemd. I have to stop the service and then start again.
I tested to comment out my http (not https)?baseurlin the config on my bare metal Ubuntu install latest-22328 and triggered a restart from the UI but Reactor would not start after that.
If I uncomment the key and restart the service, Reactor comes back to life.
Is my setup an exceptional circumstance or is this only applicable on new installs -
It's working for me, and I've done some fresh installs of 22328 while testing alternatives to Raspberry Pi (a couple of promising boards so far). I hate to say it, but your post is right on the line of "I tried X and it didn't work for me," so without more detail, I can't really guide you.
-
@toggledbits said in latest-22328 and baseurl [EDIT]: restarts fail:
It's working for me
This is at first all I wanted to know, if anyone else was having the same issue or it's just my setup.
Sorry for the lack of details, I did not know what else to provide as the log is dead silent after shutting down...
I will debug further.
-
Looks like it's related to openLuups MQTT server. The shutdown process hangs after sending LWT to openLuup (MQTTController#mqtt in log).
Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.775Z <app:NOTICE> Closing Structure... Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.776Z <Structure:INFO> Structure#1 Stopping controllers... Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.776Z <Controller:NOTICE> VeraController#vera stopping Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.778Z <Controller:ERR> Controller VeraController#vera is off-line! Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.799Z <EzloController:NOTICE> EzloController#ezlo stopping Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.800Z <wsapi:WARN> client close from unknown connection? "192.168.1.2#5" Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.800Z <wsapi:WARN> client close from unknown connection? "192.168.1.238#4" Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.800Z <wsapi:WARN> client close from unknown connection? "192.168.1.238#3" Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.800Z <wsapi:WARN> client close from unknown connection? "192.168.1.238#2" Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.800Z <wsapi:WARN> client close from unknown connection? "192.168.1.2#1" Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.802Z <EzloController:NOTICE> EzloController#ezlo connection closed: 1000 closing Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.804Z <Controller:ERR> Controller EzloController#ezlo is off-line! Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.804Z <Controller:NOTICE> EzloController#ezlo stopping Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.806Z <DynamicGroupController:null> DynamicGroupController#groups stopping Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.806Z <Controller:NOTICE> DynamicGroupController#groups stopping Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.808Z <Controller:ERR> Controller DynamicGroupController#groups is off-line! Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.809Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass stopping Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.810Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket closing, 1000 Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.810Z <Controller:NOTICE> HassController#hass stopping Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.811Z <Controller:ERR> Controller HassController#hass is off-line! Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.823Z <Controller:NOTICE> OWMWeatherController#weather stopping Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.824Z <Controller:ERR> Controller OWMWeatherController#weather is off-line! Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.825Z <Controller:NOTICE> SystemController#reactor_system stopping Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.826Z <Controller:ERR> Controller SystemController#reactor_system is off-line! Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.827Z <MQTTController:NOTICE> MQTTController#mosquitto-mqtt stopping, sending LWT Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.870Z <MQTTController:NOTICE> LWT sent; closing broker connection Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.870Z <Controller:NOTICE> MQTTController#mosquitto-mqtt stopping Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.871Z <Controller:ERR> Controller MQTTController#mosquitto-mqtt is off-line! Nov 26 10:45:58 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:45:58.874Z <MQTTController:NOTICE> MQTTController#mqtt stopping, sending LWT Nov 26 10:46:03 homebridge node[686832]: [latest-22328]2022-11-26T09:46:03.452Z <httpapi:INFO> HTTP server closed.If I disable that controller Reactor restarts fine as usual.
@toggledbits Is this the moment openLuup MQTT support ends in Reactor or can I change something to make it work again?
@akbooer I've updated openLuup from 22.9.3 to 22.11.22 but no success to this issue.The thing is it's running great when it finally comes up again after a long wait of a forced restart with systemd but it doesn't feel right to force kill the process even though the shutdown process is almost finished.
-
@crille said in latest-22328 restart fails:
Looks like it's related to openLuups MQTT server. The shutdown process hangs after sending LWT to openLuup (MQTTController#mqtt in log).
I think we've seen an issue like that previously. I don't think I see that line in the log you posted?
There may be a problem with retained messages (ie. LWT) and wildcard subscriptions in the openLuup server... I'd have to check.
-
I use a popular package to handle the MQTT broker connection, so I can't see the innards of communications and confirm, but from the rhythm of the log output, it appears that the broker is not sending an ACK to the publish of the LWT; the
publish()call appears to be sitting there waiting for it. -
Does this mean 22328 require an ACK but 22310 does not? or has something else changed?
-
22310 still required an ACK, in a sense. It didn't wait for it. But because the ACK never arrived, the task in the
mqttpackage also never cleared (they don't have a time-out mechanism), so it just stayed in the queue forever... as did every other topic sent with a non-zero QoS. This actually causes a memory leak that could lead to exhaustion and a crash, because the ACK never comes so the task is never removed from the queue, and those tasks remain and proliferate in the queue.IMO, I think it's fine if @akbooer doesn't truly support QoS levels 1 and 2 in his MQTT implementation just for basic use, but not sending an ACK regardless isn't the right choice, in my view, and it's going to cause problems for a lot of clients that may not be immediately evident (like memory leaks/exhaustion).
-
@toggledbits said in latest-22328 restart fails:
I think it's fine if @akbooer doesn't truly support QoS levels 1 and 2 in his MQTT implementation just for basic use
It only supports QoS 0 .
Nevertheless, the protocol should be respected. AFAIK all PUBLISH requests receive an ACK unless the connection goes down in between times.
-
This is the end of
parse.PUBLISH():-- ACKNOWLEDGEMENT -- The receiver of a PUBLISH Packet MUST respond according to Table 3.4 - Expected Publish Packet -- response as determined by the QoS in the PUBLISH packet [MQTT-3.3.4-1] --[[ Table 3.4 - Expected Publish Packet response QoS Level Expected Response QoS 0 None QoS 1 PUBACK Packet QoS 2 PUBREC Packet --]] local ack -- None, because we only handle QoS 0 return ack, nil, TopicName, ApplicationMessage, RETAIN endComments to the contrary, it appears it returns
ack, which is declared butnil... so... no ACK?Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.
-
@toggledbits does Reactor publish it's LWT message with QoS > 0 even though the MQTTController config is at
qos: 0? otherwise the expected response would be none. -
Yes, it uses QoS 1 (and retain true) because it's a "vital" message. The
qosyou can set in config is for the echo/entity publish functionality; it does not affect other messages. Still, this only requires that the broker acknowledge its receipt (3.3.4), not any delivery, and does not even enforce that QoS on subscribers (3.8.3) -
"The receiver of a PUBLISH Packet MUST respond according to Table 3.4 - Expected Publish Packet response as determined by the QoS in the PUBLISH Packet."
So even though the server only supports QoS 0 it's obligated to send a PUBACK on a QoS 1 level packet as described in table 3.4, correct?
-
Yes, PUBACK for QoS 1, and PUBREC for QoS 2. I don't think that would be a big problem for @akbooer when he gets the time, because all of the information contained in the response can be sourced from the request (i.e. topic, packet identifier, etc.). And otherwise the treatment of the PUBLISH packet can be the same (no further changes beyond sending those ACKs). Not actually having guaranteed delivery behind that is, in my view, an acceptable variance. On the sending side (repeat to subscribers), even though a subscriber may request QoS 1 or 2 for packets from the broker, it still must accept QoS 0 packets (because the requested QoS is a maximum, not an absolute), so everything outbound at QoS 0 isn't likely going to cause problems, especially in this world.
To summarize: if he just provides the PUBACK and PUBREC responses to fix that layer of the protocol, that's good enough. No further actions required above that layer. Not fully compliant (no guaranteed delivery), but at that point, few if any would ever notice.
The other question I don't have an answer for (or I've forgotten; and haven't dug through code to figure out)... @akbooer, does it support retain? If so, what's the storage mechanism, and is it persistent?
Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.
-
Well, I must be reading the MQTT 3.1.1 spec all wrong.
When I read:
"The SUBACK Packet sent by the Server to the Client MUST contain a return code for each Topic Filter/QoS pair. This return code MUST either show the maximum QoS that was granted for that Subscription or indicate that the subscription failed [MQTT-3.8.4-5]. The Server might grant a lower maximum QoS than the subscriber requested. The QoS of Payload Messages sent in response to a Subscription MUST be the minimum of the QoS of the originally published message and the maximum QoS granted by the Server. The server is permitted to send duplicate copies of a message to a subscriber in the case where the original message was published with QoS 1 and the maximum QoS granted was QoS 0 [MQTT-3.8.4-6]."
...I understood it to mean that, since I only ever grant QoS 0, then no message would require a PUBACK or a PUBREC.
I realise that this is my bad for writing my own MQTT broker, but it made sense in the context of openLuup, especially in support of Shelly devices which was the reason I did it in the first place. I apologise if this has led to some difficulties, and I'm starting to look at an MQTT validation suite to check out my implementation further. I also realize that Mosquitto is the de-facto standard, but it turns out that having an internal server confers some significant benefits in terms of the internal openLuup architecture.
However, if anyone can clarify the about QoS response issue further, I'm very happy to comply. If a simple fix is to send PUBACK or PUBREC, then I'll do it, but I want to know the reason why. I do understand that the original CONNECT request contains a LWT QoS, per this paragraph:
3.1.2.6 Will QoS
"Position: bits 4 and 3 of the Connect Flags."
"These two bits specify the QoS level to be used when publishing the Will Message."
"If the Will Flag is set to 0, then the Will QoS MUST be set to 0 (0x00) [MQTT-3.1.2-13]."
"If the Will Flag is set to 1, the value of Will QoS can be 0 (0x00), 1 (0x01), or 2 (0x02). It MUST NOT be 3 (0x03) [MQTT-3.1.2-14]."
...but I had assumed that QoS to be overridden by the actual level established in SUBSCRIBE / SUBACK. However, now that I write that, it seems the LWT actually may have a separate life from standard messages?
-
@toggledbits said in latest-22328 restart fails:
The other question I don't have an answer for (or I've forgotten; and haven't dug through code to figure out)... @akbooer, does it support retain? If so, what's the storage mechanism, and is it persistent?
Yes, it supports retained messages.
Is it persistent? Not across openLuup restarts.
The openLuup console page: openLuupIP:3480/console?page=mqtt shows all current subscriptions and also (at the bottom) retained messages.
-
@akbooer said in latest-22328 restart fails:
...I understood it to mean that, since I only ever grant QoS 0, then no message would require a PUBACK or a PUBREC.
This section is about your response to a SUBSCRIBE (SUBACK)and what QoS you use to PUBLISH. If you only grant QoS 0 on subscribe, then you will never expect a PUBACK or PUBREC because you never publish anything to a subscriber other than QoS 0.
It in no way limits what a client may publish to the broker, which could include any QoS.
