Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] Hubitat Hub Information Driver v3 and probe device
Set Reaction > Script Action
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Errors after updating to MQTTController build 25139
tunnusT
I'm running MSR build 25139 on Docker, using MQTT controller 24293, and everything working as expected. But if I try to upgrade to MQTTController build 25139, I'm getting the following errors on MSR UI: An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.god Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.green Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.red Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto run" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.pump Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa watchdog" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.status Last 11:20:37 My MQTT configuration (local_mqtt_devices.yaml) for the related entity is: layzspa_message: type: ValueSensor capabilities: ["temperature_sensor", "value_sensor", "power_sensor"] primary_attribute: power_sensor.value events: "layzspa/message": "power_sensor.value": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.PWR )' expr: "float(payload.PWR)" "value_sensor.air": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AIR )' expr: "float(payload.AIR)" "value_sensor.pump": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.FLT )' expr: "float(payload.FLT)" "value_sensor.god": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GOD )' expr: "float(payload.GOD)" "value_sensor.lock": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.LCK )' expr: "float(payload.LCK)" "value_sensor.unit": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.UNT )' expr: "float(payload.UNT)" "value_sensor.error": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.ERR )' expr: "float(payload.ERR)" "temperature_sensor.green": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GRN )' expr: "float(payload.GRN)" "temperature_sensor.red": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.RED )' expr: "float(payload.RED)" "temperature_sensor.target": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TGT )' expr: "float(payload.TGT)" "temperature_sensor.value": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TMP )' expr: "float(payload.TMP)" "temperature_sensor.virtual": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.VTM )' expr: "round(float(payload.VTM), 1)" "temperature_sensor.ambient": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AMB )' expr: "float(payload.AMB)" "layzspa/Status": "value_sensor.status": if_expr: '! isnull( payload )' expr: "payload" "layzspa/button": "value_sensor.button": if_expr: '! isnull( payload )' expr: "payload" and in reactor.yaml I have: "layzspa_states": name: "Lay-Z-Spa States" friendly_name: 'Lay-Z-Spa States' include: layzspa_message I realize my MQTT configuration might be a bit unorthodox, but could there still be something unintentional in the latest MQTTController build? If needed, I can provide detailed logs.
Multi-System Reactor
🎉 My very first MSR controller: OpenSprinkler
therealdbT
Since today is my birthday - and I still pretend to be unconventional - I'm giving away a present to this wonderful community and I'm releasing my first OpenSprinkler controller for MSR. It was real fun to code it - and while it's still WIP, it seems to work OK for me. It's polling-based at the moment, but I'll add support for updates via MQTT very soon (it's already partially coded). Get it at (install is similar to MQTTController and such): https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-opensprinkler Feel free to try it. It's beta software, but it's stable. I'll update it weekly until all the tasks from my todo list are empty. Since I've learnt a lot from this controller, I'll explore new controllers soon.
Multi-System Reactor
Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
T
Good day all, I'm in the process of trying to shut down my 10 year old Linux home server that served many purposes, but primarily it's what I used for my NAS/Plex Media server. I migrated the NAS aspect of the server in November of last year to a true NAS solution (Ubiquti UNAS Pro), which is rack mount and much more efficient than my old tower, which it's only side benefit was heating my home office during the winter. Unfortunately it also means heating my home office during the summer, which were about to be in full swing. I have two things running on this 10 year old server at this point. MSR and pi-hole. I'm running Plex Media Server on Fedora Workstation in Podman on mini PC, which is much more energy efficient than my old tower. My next step is to migrate MSR. I know there are images of MSR out there, and creating it is well documented. I'm going to be using Podman instead of Docker for various reasons, but they work very similar. What I don't know, is what I need to do to migrate my existing Bare Metal installation over to a container. Has anyone done this? Any advice?
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Organizing/ structuring rule sets and rules
R
Hi guys, Just wondering how you guys organize your rule sets and rules. I wish I had an extra layer to have some more granularity, but my feature request was not popular. Maybe there are better ways to organize my rule sets. I use the rule sets now primarily for rooms. So a rule set per room. But maybe grouping by functionality works better. Any examples/ suggestions would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Moving MSR from a QNAP container to RP 5 - some issues
Tom_DT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Widget deletion does not work and landing page (status) is empy
M
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Need help reducing false positive notifications
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deleting widgets
tunnusT
Hopefully a trivial question, but how do you delete widgets in a status page? Using build 22266
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT configuration question
tunnusT
I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file x_mqtt_device: set_speed: arguments: speed: type: str topic: "command/%friendly_name%" payload: type: json expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }' While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?
Multi-System Reactor
System Configuration Check - time is offset
F
Hi! I get this message when I'm on the status tab: System Configuration Check The time on this system and on the Reactor host are significantly different. This may be due to incorrect system configuration on either or both. Please check the configuration of both systems. The host reports 2025-04-01T15:29:29.252Z; browser reports 2025-04-01T15:29:40.528Z; difference 11.276 seconds. I have MSR installed as a docker on my Home Assistant Blue / Hardkernel ODROID-N2/N2+. MSR version is latest-25082-3c348de6. HA versions are: Core 2025.3.4 Supervisor 2025.03.4 Operating System 15.1 I have restarted HA as well as MSR multiple times. This message didn´t show two weeks ago. Don´t know if it have anything to do with the latest MSR version. Do anyone know what I can try? Thanks in advance! Let's Be Careful Out There (Hill Street reference...) /Fanan
Multi-System Reactor
Programmatically capture HTTP Request action status code or error
therealdbT
I have a very strange situation, where if InfluxDB restarts, other containers may fail when restarting at the same time (under not easy to understand circumstances), and InfluxDB remains unreachable (and these containers crashes). I need to reboot these containers in an exact order, after rebooting InfluxDB. While I understand what's going on, I need a way to reliable determine that InfluxDB is not reachable and these containers are not reachable, in order to identify this situation and manually check what's going on - and, maybe, in the future, automatically restart them if needed. So, I was looking at HTTP Request action, but I need to capture the HTTP response code, instead of the response (becase if ping is OK, InfluxDB will reply with a 204), and, potentially, a way to programmatically detect that it's failing to get the response. While I could write a custom HTTP controller for this or a custom HTTP virtual device, I was wondering if this is somewhat on you roadmap @toggledbits Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
ZwaveJSUI - RGBWW BULB - Warm/Cold White interfered with RGB settings - Bulb doesn't change color if in WarmWhite state.
N
Hi , I'm on -Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25067-62e21a2d -Docker on Synology NAS -ZWaveJSUI 9.31.0.6c80945 Problem with ZwaveJSUI: When I try to change color to a bulb RGBWW, it doesn't change to the RGB color and the bulb remains warm or cold white. I tryed with Zipato RGBW Bulb V2 RGBWE2, Hank Bulb HKZW-RGB01, Aentec 6 A-ZWA002, so seems that it happens with all RGBWW bulb with reactor/zwavejsui. I'm using from reator the entity action: "rgb_color.set" and "rgb_color.set_rgb". After I send the reactor command, It changes in zwavejsui the rgb settings but doesn't put the white channel to "0", so the prevalent channel remains warm/cold White and the bulb doesn't change into the rgb color. This is the status of the bulb in zwavejsui after "rgb_color.set" (235,33,33,) and the bulb is still warmWhite. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor={"warmWhite":204,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} The "cold white" and "warm white" settings interfer with the rgb color settings. Reactor can change bulb colors with rgb_color set — (value, ui8, 0x000000 to 0xffffff) or rgb_color set_rgb — (red, green, blue, all ui1, 0 to 255) but if warm or cold white are not to "0", zwavejsui doesn't change them and I can't find a way to change into rgb or from rgb back to warm white. So if I use from reactor: rgb_color set_rgb — (235,33,33) in zwavejsui I have x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: targetColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: targetColor 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: currentColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: currentColor In zwavejsui, the bulb changes rgb set but warm White remains to "204" and the bulb remais on warm White channel bacause is prevalent on rgb set. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_0=204 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_1=0 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_2=235 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_3=33 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_4=33 Is it possible to targetColor also for "warmWhite" and "coldWhite" and have something similar to this? x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"warmWhite":0,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} Thanks in advance.
Multi-System Reactor
Problem with simultaneous notifications.
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Problem after upgrading to 25067
R
MSR had been running fine, but I decided to follow the message to upgrade to 25067. Since the upgrade, I have received the message "Controller "<name>" (HubitatController hubitat2) could not be loaded at startup. Its ID is not unique." MSR throws the message on every restart. Has anyone else encountered this problem? I am running MSR on a Raspberry Pi4 connecting to two Hubitat units over an OpenVPN tunnel. One C8 and a C8 Pro. Both are up-to-date. It appears that despite the error message that MSR may be operating properly.
Multi-System Reactor
Global expressions not always evaluated
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression evaluation
V
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] Hubitat Hub Information Driver v3 and probe device

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
9 Posts 2 Posters 586 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SweetGenius
    wrote on last edited by SweetGenius
    #1

    I have upgraded my Hubitat Hub Information Driver to v3 and after the latest MSR update latest-23028 MSR is working ok. The problem is when MSR probes the device it appears to affect the polling in the new Hub Information Device and its data does not update the data fields in Hubitat. If I remove the Hub Information Device from Maker API so MSR can't see it, The Hub information driver updates the data as expected in Hubitat. I added the device back into Maker API the same problem returns in Hubitat. I have tried to have MSR probe a different device by adding a different probe device and probe action in the reactor.yaml per the documentation but it appears then it still uses the Hub Information Device as the probe device instead of the one specified in the reactor.yaml. See Logs below. Is this the intended behavior to always use the Hub Information Driver if found and not use the device in the reactor.yaml file? Any recommendations on how to get MSR and the v3 of the driver to work correctly or can you see what I am doing wrong?

    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.471Z <Controller:NOTICE> Controller HassController#hass is now online.
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.471Z <Rule:INFO> Internet Check (rule-l44qss4f in Home) starting evaluation; because entity-changed System#reactor_system>system
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.471Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Version Available (rule-labweim2 in Notify) starting evaluation; because entity-changed System#reactor_system>system
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> Internet Check (rule-l44qss4f in Home) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> Internet Check (rule-l44qss4f in Home) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Version Available (rule-labweim2 in Notify) trigger evaluation result is false (previously false)
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Version Available (rule-labweim2 in Notify) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> Internet Check (rule-l44qss4f in Home) evaluation complete
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.472Z <Rule:INFO> MSR Update Version Available (rule-labweim2 in Notify) evaluation complete
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.673Z <HubitatController:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat Maker API responded with 91 devices
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.766Z <HubitatController:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat found 'Hub Information Driver v3' device #"481"; using for probe/health checks.
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.780Z <Controller:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.780Z <Rule:INFO> Roku Pause (rule-l3nlrzu9 in Home) starting evaluation; because entity-changed BinarySensor#hubitat>519
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.780Z <Rule:INFO> Stairs Light Low Light (rule-kulslls9 in Living Room) starting evaluation; because entity-changed BinarySensor#hubitat>519
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.780Z <Rule:INFO> Porch Motion Extended check (rule-l3kr45m8 in Porch) starting evaluation; because entity-changed BinarySensor#hubitat>519
    [latest-23028]2023-02-11T23:27:50.780Z <Rule:INFO> Porch Light Manual On (rule-kmtxw155 in Porch) starting evaluation; because entity-changed BinarySensor#hubitat>519
    

    Snippet from the reactor.yaml:

     # action_pace: 100
          # warn_unresponsive: true
          # probe_device: hubitat>132 (not needed if Hub Information app installed)
          probe_device: hubitat>2
          # probe_action: x_hubitat_Configuration.configure (not needed if Hub Information app installed)
          probe_action: x_hubitat_Configuration.configure
          # probe_action: x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh
    

    Synology Docker latest-23028
    Hubitat v2.3.4.139
    Hub Information Driver v3

    Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I am not able to duplicate the behavior you describe (Hub Info stops polling). I suggest you check your polling interval in your Hub Information device configuration and make sure it's a sensible number (and specifically not 0). There also have been several bug fix releases of that driver; the current version is 3.0.14 and that's what you should be on.

      The documentation describes the probe_device config as an integer; that's not what you have shown. It should be the device number only. It doesn't need to know which controller because you are in configuration for a controller. The Hub Information driver, if present, is still the preferred device and will override.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        I am not able to duplicate the behavior you describe (Hub Info stops polling). I suggest you check your polling interval in your Hub Information device configuration and make sure it's a sensible number (and specifically not 0). There also have been several bug fix releases of that driver; the current version is 3.0.14 and that's what you should be on.

        The documentation describes the probe_device config as an integer; that's not what you have shown. It should be the device number only. It doesn't need to know which controller because you are in configuration for a controller. The Hub Information driver, if present, is still the preferred device and will override.

        S Offline
        S Offline
        SweetGenius
        wrote on last edited by SweetGenius
        #3

        I am running the latest version of the driver: v3.0.14.
        It appears to me when MSR probes the device or if you press configure in the driver, all the new scheduled poll times increase causing them never to run. I have my poll times set as follows: poll1: 9 mins, poll2: 119 mins, poll3: 241 mins, poll4: 12 hours.
        Screen Shot 2023-02-12 at 2.31.24 PM.png Here is a screenshot showing the scheduled poll times to start:
        Screen Shot 2023-02-12 at 2.29.39 PM.png

        After MSR polls the scheduled poll times:
        Screen Shot 2023-02-12 at 2.40.38 PM.png

        Poll3 and poll2 are not running.
        Here is what I'm polling in the driver.
        Screen Shot 2023-02-12 at 3.13.54 PM.png

        I know this is not your driver but I'm encouraged if you are not seeing a problem. I must have something configured wrong. Would you mind checking your driver and see if your scheduled times increase also?

        Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          They do. I use much a much shorter interval (actually, the default 300). It behaves the same way just using a simple refresh action.

          That's going to make Hub Information Driver v3 unusable for this purpose, and send me back to the drawing board on the detection and probe for quiet channel. I'll look into it, but it may be a few days before I have time. I'm on other projects.

          In your post/screen shots, I don't see any evidence, however, that the polls are not running. If they are scheduled, they are running. It's just a change in the interval caused by the Configure or Refresh. From what I can see, every attribute is being updated when the probe occurs. I am not seeing that the updates stop. So that just means things are being updated probably more frequently than you've scheduled -- pretty much opposite what you're reporting here. Are you seeing things that should be updated not be, or are you just assuming they haven't updated because of timing change?

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            They do. I use much a much shorter interval (actually, the default 300). It behaves the same way just using a simple refresh action.

            That's going to make Hub Information Driver v3 unusable for this purpose, and send me back to the drawing board on the detection and probe for quiet channel. I'll look into it, but it may be a few days before I have time. I'm on other projects.

            In your post/screen shots, I don't see any evidence, however, that the polls are not running. If they are scheduled, they are running. It's just a change in the interval caused by the Configure or Refresh. From what I can see, every attribute is being updated when the probe occurs. I am not seeing that the updates stop. So that just means things are being updated probably more frequently than you've scheduled -- pretty much opposite what you're reporting here. Are you seeing things that should be updated not be, or are you just assuming they haven't updated because of timing change?

            S Offline
            S Offline
            SweetGenius
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            It looks like when MSR probes the device, it then resets the next scheduled poll times to the time of the probe + whatever time you have set to poll in the device preferences. If you have small poll times then the polls might fire between MSR polls. Here is the filtered Hubitat log showing which polls run. lastPoll: baseData is when MSR does the probe. The first part of the log is with the poll:1 time is set at 9 minutes. If the time elapsed since a MSR probe > than 9 minutes then the poll:1 will run. It ran once at 06:45:15. I then changed the poll1 time from 9 mins to 3 mins at 8:00pm to test. You can see it ran more often but I don't know why the baseData slowed way down also.

            dev:4812023-02-13 08:39:50.352 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:37:48.478 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:34:48.349 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:31:48.207 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:28:48.062 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:25:48.076 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:23:46.117 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:20:45.974 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:17:45.811 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:14:45.676 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:11:45.509 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:08:45.408 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:05:45.460 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:03:43.698 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 08:00:43.644 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:56:18.977 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:54:17.207 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:50:52.589 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:44:17.322 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:39:17.057 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:36:18.474 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:34:16.720 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:26:27.444 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:24:16.188 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:21:27.225 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:14:58.542 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:09:15.465 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:04:15.275 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 07:01:16.758 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 06:59:14.981 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 06:54:14.847 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 06:45:15.886 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            dev:4812023-02-13 06:36:15.792 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 06:34:14.031 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 06:29:52.364 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 06:26:15.479 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 06:24:13.706 PMinfolastPoll : baseData
            dev:4812023-02-13 06:19:41.211 PMinfolastPoll : poll1
            

            I am not looking for an immediate fix or change, Just trying to communicate to you what I am seeing.

            Would it be an option to write your own virtual device driver for Hubitat so you could probe that device and return the data you want for the health check?

            Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              That is all clear to me. What I am trying to convey to you is that the rescheduling of the polls does not mean that the Hub Information Driver v3 is not updating its attributes (in effect, doing the polls). When Reactor causes the probe (if it needs to), the driver does its poll at the time of the request, updates all of the attributes, and then reschedules for the next poll. So the attributes are still being updated, as I said, just sometimes earlier than the driver itself would do. I could leave it that way and most users would never know or care.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                That is all clear to me. What I am trying to convey to you is that the rescheduling of the polls does not mean that the Hub Information Driver v3 is not updating its attributes (in effect, doing the polls). When Reactor causes the probe (if it needs to), the driver does its poll at the time of the request, updates all of the attributes, and then reschedules for the next poll. So the attributes are still being updated, as I said, just sometimes earlier than the driver itself would do. I could leave it that way and most users would never know or care.

                S Offline
                S Offline
                SweetGenius
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                With all due respect and I do mean that and without beating this to death, I am only seeing the attributes that update when MSR probes are the baseData attributes witch per the Hub information driver’s documentation are (attributes: firmwareVersionString, hardwareID, id, latitude, localIP, localSrvPortTCP, locationId, locationName, longitude, name, temperatureScale, timeZone, type, uptime, zigbeeChannel, zigbeeEui, zigbeeId, zigbeeStatus, zipCode). I can find these attributes updating in the logs every time. Some examples of attributes that are not updating are publicIP and hubUpdateVersion among others. I use those attributes in rules and they do not update. I can not find evidence of these being updated in the logs or driver unless you set the poll time for these to very fast interval as I tried to document in the previous post. I do believe the next scheduled poll time is accurate and the attributes associated with the polls will not update until that time. Probably the best thing to do is to revert to the v2 driver.

                Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  SweetGenius
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Installation of Reactor build 23049 and configuring a virtual switch as a probe device appears to be working well.
                  FYI, The "Manual" link in the Reactor UI doesn't have the updated docs that are linked to in the Release notes thread. Hubitat Controller, Other Configuration, probe_device section. I have tried a hard reset in safari and Firefox browsers but the documentation is not the updated instructions. Thank You.
                  Synology Docker
                  latest-23049

                  Synology Docker MSR, Hubitat, Home Assistant, Homebridge, ZwaveJS, MQTT, NUT controller.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Great. Thanks for letting me know.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    Recent Topics

                    • Set Reaction > Script Action
                      therealdbT
                      therealdb
                      0
                      6
                      77

                    • Wiring Samotech SM308-S into light fitting
                      akbooerA
                      akbooer
                      0
                      2
                      41

                    • Errors after updating to MQTTController build 25139
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      6
                      69

                    • 🎉 My very first MSR controller: OpenSprinkler
                      therealdbT
                      therealdb
                      5
                      13
                      631

                    • Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
                      T
                      tamorgen
                      0
                      5
                      93

                    • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      5
                      122
                      37.3k

                    • Z-Wave Future....
                      CatmanV2C
                      CatmanV2
                      0
                      5
                      176

                    • Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      4
                      131

                    • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
                      wmarcolinW
                      wmarcolin
                      0
                      7
                      259

                    • Disaster recovery and virtualisation
                      CatmanV2C
                      CatmanV2
                      0
                      5
                      699

                    • Remote access of Zwave stick from Z-wave server
                      CatmanV2C
                      CatmanV2
                      0
                      3
                      422
                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                    Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Unsolved