I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file
x_mqtt_device: set_speed: arguments: speed: type: str topic: "command/%friendly_name%" payload: type: json expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }'While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?
Hi!
I get this message when I'm on the status tab:
System Configuration Check
The time on this system and on the Reactor host are significantly different. This may be due to incorrect system configuration on either or both. Please check the configuration of both systems. The host reports 2025-04-01T15:29:29.252Z; browser reports 2025-04-01T15:29:40.528Z; difference 11.276 seconds.
I have MSR installed as a docker on my Home Assistant Blue / Hardkernel ODROID-N2/N2+. MSR version is latest-25082-3c348de6.
HA versions are:
Core 2025.3.4
Supervisor 2025.03.4
Operating System 15.1
I have restarted HA as well as MSR multiple times. This message didn´t show two weeks ago. Don´t know if it have anything to do with the latest MSR version.
Do anyone know what I can try?
Thanks in advance!
Let's Be Careful Out There (Hill Street reference...) 🙂
/Fanan
I have a very strange situation, where if InfluxDB restarts, other containers may fail when restarting at the same time (under not easy to understand circumstances), and InfluxDB remains unreachable (and these containers crashes). I need to reboot these containers in an exact order, after rebooting InfluxDB.
While I understand what's going on, I need a way to reliable determine that InfluxDB is not reachable and these containers are not reachable, in order to identify this situation and manually check what's going on - and, maybe, in the future, automatically restart them if needed.
So, I was looking at HTTP Request action, but I need to capture the HTTP response code, instead of the response (becase if ping is OK, InfluxDB will reply with a 204), and, potentially, a way to programmatically detect that it's failing to get the response.
While I could write a custom HTTP controller for this or a custom HTTP virtual device, I was wondering if this is somewhat on you roadmap @toggledbits
Thanks!
Hi ,
I'm on
-Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25067-62e21a2d
-Docker on Synology NAS
-ZWaveJSUI 9.31.0.6c80945
Problem with ZwaveJSUI:
When I try to change color to a bulb RGBWW, it doesn't change to the RGB color and the bulb remains warm or cold white.
I tryed with Zipato RGBW Bulb V2 RGBWE2, Hank Bulb HKZW-RGB01, Aentec 6 A-ZWA002, so seems that it happens with all RGBWW bulb with reactor/zwavejsui.
I'm using from reator the entity action: "rgb_color.set" and "rgb_color.set_rgb".
After I send the reactor command, It changes in zwavejsui the rgb settings but doesn't put the white channel to "0", so the prevalent channel remains warm/cold White and the bulb doesn't change into the rgb color.
This is the status of the bulb in zwavejsui after "rgb_color.set" (235,33,33,) and the bulb is still warmWhite.
x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor={"warmWhite":204,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33}The "cold white" and "warm white" settings interfer with the rgb color settings.
Reactor can change bulb colors with rgb_color set — (value, ui8, 0x000000 to 0xffffff) or rgb_color set_rgb — (red, green, blue, all ui1, 0 to 255) but if warm or cold white
are not to "0", zwavejsui doesn't change them and I can't find a way to change into rgb or from rgb back to warm white.
So if I use from reactor: rgb_color set_rgb — (235,33,33) in zwavejsui I have
x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: targetColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: targetColor 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: currentColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: currentColorIn zwavejsui, the bulb changes rgb set but warm White remains to "204" and the bulb remais on warm White channel bacause is prevalent on rgb set.
x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_0=204 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_1=0 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_2=235 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_3=33 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_4=33Is it possible to targetColor also for "warmWhite" and "coldWhite" and have something similar to this?
x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"warmWhite":0,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33}Thanks in advance.
Good day all,
I have a reaction set up, that I use for both troubleshooting and changing home modes when one of my family members either arrive or are leaving. I use the companion app for HAAS on our iPhones, and HAAS reports if the person associated with the iPhone enters or leaves the geofenced area around my home. I'm sure most MSR and HAAS users are familiar with this.
I use this rule set mainly as a condition for other rules, however, as part of troubleshooting, a notification is sent through HAAS to the companion app when the rule becomes true. The problem is that I'm getting notifications now for both arriving and departing simultaneously.
96b3f7db-ba09-499e-a78c-86903b603857-image.png
36903cdd-a87f-473b-82ef-af9ef96d3c44-image.png It used to work fine as intended. I'm not sure exactly when it changed, but now I'm getting two notifications when either of these conditions change.
Any idea what could be happening?
Edit:
Running: latest-25082-3c348de6, bare-metal Linux
ZWaveJSControllerr [0.1.25082]
MSR had been running fine, but I decided to follow the message to upgrade to 25067. Since the upgrade, I have received the message "Controller "<name>" (HubitatController hubitat2) could not be loaded at startup. Its ID is not unique." MSR throws the message on every restart. Has anyone else encountered this problem?
I am running MSR on a Raspberry Pi4 connecting to two Hubitat units over an OpenVPN tunnel. One C8 and a C8 Pro. Both are up-to-date. It appears that despite the error message that MSR may be operating properly.
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.Similarly as for local expressions, global expressions evaluate and update fine when getEntity(...) structure is used. However, at least when certain functions are in use, expressions do not update.
Consider the following test case:
Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 16.29.42.png
Even though auto-evaluation is active, value does not change (it changes only if that expression is manually run). MSR restarts do not help.
Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 16.31.43.png
Note: Tested using build 25067 on Docker. I have also a PR open (but couldn't now get details or PR number as my Mantis account was somehow expired?).
Trying to understand what cause a local expresssion to be evaluated. I have read the manual but I am still not clear about it. Using the test rule below, I can see in the log that the rule is being automatically evaluated every time the temperature entity is changing. That is great...
What I am trying to understand is why the expression is not evaluated based on time as well since the "case" statement has time dependencies.
Any help would be appreciated
I have the following test rule:
eba6a3ea-ff61-4610-88c9-9b9864f11ff8-Screenshot 2025-01-21 095244.png
2d9c1ff5-7b73-4005-b324-9029c2709db9-Screenshot 2025-01-21 095302.png
Here is the expressioncode:
vFrom1 = "09:25:00", vFrom2 = "09:30:00", vFrom3 = "09:41:00", vTo = "10:55:00", # Get current time (format HH:MM:SS) vToDay = strftime("%H:%M:%S"), #Get current house temperature CurrentHouseTemp = getEntity( "hass>Thermostat2 " ).attributes.temperature_sensor.value, case when CurrentHouseTemp <= 19 and vToDay >= vFrom1 && vToDay <= vTo: "true1" # From1 when CurrentHouseTemp <= 20 and vToDay >= vFrom2 && vToDay <= vTo: "true2" # From2 when CurrentHouseTemp < 26 and vToDay >= vFrom3 && vToDay <= vTo: "true3" # From3 else "false" endI am getting a Runtime error on different browsers when I click exit when editing an existing or creating a new global reaction containing a group. If the global reaction does not have a group I don't get an error. I see a similar post on the forum about a Runtime Error when creating reactions but started a new thread as that appears to be solved.
The Runtime Error is different in the two browsers
Safari v18.3
Google Chrome 133.0.6943.142
TypeError: self.editor.isModified is not a function at HTMLButtonElement.<anonymous> (http://192.168.10.21:8111/reactor/en-US/lib/js/reaction-list.js:171:34) You may report this error, but do not screen shot it. Copy-paste the complete text. Remember to include a description of the operation you were performing in as much detail as possible. Report using the Reactor Bug Tracker (in your left navigation) or at the SmartHome Community.Steps to reproduce:
Click the pencil to edit a global reaction with a group.
Click the Exit button.
Runtime error appears.
or
Click Create Reaction
Click Add Action
Select Group
Add Condition such as Entity Attribute.
Add an Action.
Click Save
Click Exit
Runtime error appears.
I don’t know how long the error has been there as I haven’t edited the global reaction in a long time.
Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25060-f32eaa46
Docker
Mac OS: 15.3.1
Thanks
I am trying to delete a global expression (gLightDelay) but for some strange reason, it comes back despite clicking the Delete this expression and Save Changes buttons.
I have not created a global expression for some times and just noticed this while doing some clean-up.
I have upgraded Reactor to 25067 from 25060 and the behaviour is still there. I have restarted Reactor (as well as restarting its container) and cleared the browser's cache several times without success.
Here's what the log shows.
[latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:22.690Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" } [latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:26.254Z <GlobalExpression:NOTICE> Deleting global expression gLightDelay [latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:27.887Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" }Reactor latest-25067-62e21a2d
Docker on Synology NAS
Morning, experts. Hard on learning about the internet check script in MSR tools, I was wondering what suggestions anyone has about a local (i.e. non-internet dependent) notification method.
This was prompted by yesterday's fun and games with my ISP.
I've got the script Cronned and working properly but short of flashing a light on and off, I'm struggling to think of a way of alerting me (ideally to my phone)
I guess I could set up a Discord server at home, but that feels like overkill for a rare occasion. Any other suggestions?
TIA
C
Hi,
I'm trying to integrate the sonos-mqtt (https://sonos2mqtt.svrooij.io/) with the MSR and it's coming along nicely so far.
But cannot wrap my head around how to define custom capabilities in MQTT templates. I need this for the TTS announcements and similarly for the notification sounds where I would pass the sound file as parameter.
So this is what I have in the local_mqtt_devices.yaml
capabilities: x_sonos_announcement: attributes: actions: speak: arguments: text: type: string volume: type: int delay: type: intAnd this is the template:
templates: sonos-announcement: capabilities: - x_sonos_announcement actions: x_sonos_announcement: speak: topic: "sonos/cmd/speak" payload: expr: > { "text": parameters.text, "volume": parameters.volume, "delayMs": parameters.delay, "onlyWhenPlaying": false, "engine": "neural" } type: jsonSo the speak action should send something like this to topic sonos/cmd/speak
{ "text": "message goes here", "volume": 50, "delayMs": 100, "onlyWhenPlaying": false, "engine": "neural" }At startup the MSR seems to be quite unhappy with my configuration:
reactor | [latest-25016]2025-02-09T08:19:59.029Z <MQTTController:WARN> MQTTController#mqtt entity Entity#mqtt>sonos-announcement unable to configure capabilities [Array][ "x_sonos_announcement" ] reactor | i18n: missing fi-FI language string: Configuration for {0:q} is incomplete because the following requested capabilities are undefined: {1} reactor | i18n: missing fi-FI language string: Configuration for {0:q} has unrecognized capability {1:q} in actions reactor | Trace: Configuration for {0:q} is incomplete because the following requested capabilities are undefined: {1} reactor | at _T (/opt/reactor/server/lib/i18n.js:611:28) reactor | at AlertManager.addAlert (/opt/reactor/server/lib/AlertManager.js:125:25) reactor | at MQTTController.sendWarning (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Controller.js:627:30) reactor | at MQTTController.start (/var/reactor/ext/MQTTController/MQTTController.js:268:26) reactor | at async Promise.allSettled (index 0) Configuration for "sonos-announcement" has unrecognized capability "x_sonos_announcement" in actions Controller: MQTTController#mqtt Last 10:21:37 AM Configuration for "sonos-announcement" is incomplete because the following requested capabilities are undefined: x_sonos_announcement Controller: MQTTController#mqtt Last 10:21:37 AMThis is probably a pretty stupid question and the approach may not even work at all, but maybe someone or @toggledbits for sure, could point me to the right direction.
Basically the idea is to be able to send TTS messages from reactions using entity actions. I've previously used HTTP requests to Sonos HTTP API (https://hub.docker.com/r/chrisns/docker-node-sonos-http-api/) for the same functionality, but since moving to sonos-mqtt, I need a way to send the TTS notifications using MQTTController. Along with the actual message, volume and delay must also be parameterizable.
br,
mgvra
MSR latest-25016-d47fea38 / MQTTController [0.2.24293]
Hi, @toggledbits
I just noticed that following a reboot of my raspberry pi, some of the rules, that I was expecting to recover, are not catching up following a reboot. I have made a simple test rule (rule-m6rz6ol1) with only "after Date/time" as trigger and "turn on a lamp" as a set reaction. All my infrastructure is on the same board so Reactor, Hass, Zwavejs, ... are all rebooting.
Here is the sequence of the test case (All time converted to Zulu to match logs):
Rule "after Date/Time" set to 14:05:00z Shutdown on Raspberry Pi at 14:04:00z Power back up at 14:08:00z Rule overview shows true as of 14:08:14z waiting for 00:00:00 in GUIFrom the log I can see that MSR is picking up the rule and knows that the state of the rule has changed from false to true and tries to send the update to HASS but failed with websocket error.
Here is what I see from the log:
14:04:04z shutdown complete 14:08:08z Power up 14:08:13.111z websocket connection 14:08:15:323z Reaction to the light failed, Websocket not opened After there is a series of websocket connection attempt until 14:08:51z where it seemed to be really ready.Back in 2021 we had a discussion (https://smarthome.community/topic/700/solved-start-up?_=1738766986566) and you proposed to add a startup_delay:xxxx and startup_wait:xxxx parameter in the engine section of "reactor.yaml". When I try the startup_delay (this used to be a hard delay), the engine failed to start (I think). I then try the startup_wait:xxxx without any success. Since it wait for the connection status to be up to cancel the delay, it does not do anyting since Hass is reporting the socket up without really being up ( I think...).
Questions:
Did I figured it all wrong? should the startup_delay:xxxxx have worked? Any ideas?Here is the log:
OK now I am stuck. I did add the log but when I submit the editor complained saying that I am limited to 32767 characters. The log from the shutdown to the time the websocket is stable is about 300000 character long. What are my options?
Not a big issue simply a request if easily doable.
The MSR logs files inside the container are owned by root witch is fine however, the permissions are very restrictive. I do not know if there is something wrong with my installation but the logs permission are set to 222 (write only). Even if the docker volume is set for Read/Write the log files are retaining these values.
I go around the problem by doing a chmod 777 on all reactor logs but every time there is an MSR log rotation the permissions are set back to 222. So unless the permission are implemented in the container there is no permanent solution to this (that I know of).
I do not know much about Docker container so I do not know what is involved here.
Can the logfiles permission be simply chaged in the container to at least allow "other" read permission?
Could the MSR log rotation routine implement a chmod to set the permission?
Just a small anoyance
Thanks
@toggledbits In the MSR documentation, under Standard Capabilities, I noticed that the
button.since attribute was deprecated as of version 22256 and the metadata is the preferred way to access the last-modified time of an attribute.
Am I reading this right? Should I stop using it in my rules?
Thanks
When on my bare metal RPi with MSR I had a rule that ran every minute to check Internet status via a script in MSR called reactor_inet_check.sh
I've moved to containerized MSR and see in the instructions that this cannot be run from the container.
The script cannot run within the Reactor docker container. If you are using Reactor in a docker container, the script needs to be run by cron or an equivalent facility on the host system (e.g. some systems, like Synology NAS, have separate task managers that may be used to schedule the repeated execution of tasks such as this).
I've put a script on my container host that calls the reator_inet_check.sh script and it isn't erroring... but I still see the internet status within MSR as null.
Before I go diving down the rabbit hole... should this work?
My cronjob on the proxmox host:
909fe6f0-77fd-4734-80a4-c9e354c910b6-image.png
The contents of msr_internet_check_caller.sh
16337528-cf31-4968-bffe-af1149f7103e-image.png
Background: this is a Windows MSR install I've done for our local pool/amenity center just to run some fans and lights (not my daily driver at home). Install went perfectly fine.
Scenario: I want the lights to go on when it's dark enough (even if during a storm, not just after sunset) so I'm using solarRadiation from my weather station to drive that Trigger. Easy stuff.
Issue: sometimes, someone goes in the office and just starts flipping switches and the result can be lights turned on in the daytime or off at night. I'm trying to create a "catch-all" wherein if it is daytime and the lights somehow find their way ON, they will turn themselves back OFF.
I have the following Reaction built:
b30eab5b-5a14-4a3a-8c9a-47e3e7e53dc3-image.png
I also have this Reaction for opposite, ie the lights find themselves turned off after dark and they will turn themselves back on:
5c6946b1-297c-4eb1-9618-74820979df29-image.png
Here are my two rules:
288cba86-f941-4157-86d9-d8e7487905f7-image.png *NOTE that in my manual testing, ie I turn on the light switch at the incorrect time, when the solarRadiation level changes the Lights ON rule flags and shows as SET. On the next change of solarRadiation it goes back to reset again.
My expectation is that Lights OFF rule should see the lights are on, the solarRadiation is above the set limit, and turn them off. Instead, every other run, the ON rule moves to SET and then reset again on the following run.
Logs appear angry:
[latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.696Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<RESET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:R) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.712Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<RESET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:R) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:31.713Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<RESET> all actions completed. [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.565Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#3" closed, code=1001, reason= [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.753Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.754Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 } [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.790Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:42.839Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#6" authorized [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:43.353Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:43.353Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 } [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.146Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#6" closed, code=1001, reason= [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.308Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.309Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 } [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.346Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:48.390Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#7" authorized [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:49.412Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:49.413Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 } [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.734Z <wsapi:INFO> client "127.0.0.1#7" closed, code=1001, reason= [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.891Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/lang [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.892Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/lang from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/lang ACL (#7): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/lang", "allow": true, "index": 7 } [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.925Z <wsapi:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:52.965Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 client "127.0.0.1#8" authorized [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:54.383Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 API request from ::ffff:127.0.0.1: GET /api/v1/systime [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:03:54.384Z <httpapi:INFO> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /api/v1/systime from ::ffff:127.0.0.1 user anonymous auth none matches /api/v1/systime ACL (#5): [Object]{ "url": "/api/v1/systime", "allow": true, "index": 5 } [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:01.590Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" } [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.646Z <Rule:INFO> Lights OFF (rule-m6e33ja3 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET! [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.656Z <Rule:INFO> Lights ON (rule-m6e4ajh7 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET! [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.663Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights OFF<SET>" (rule-m6e33ja3:S) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.665Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<SET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:S) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.668Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights OFF<SET> (rule-m6e33ja3:S) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.669Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<SET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:S) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.669Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<SET> all actions completed. [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.675Z <Rule:INFO> Lights OFF (rule-m6e33ja3 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET! [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.680Z <Engine:NOTICE> ReactionHistory: no entry for [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.683Z <Engine:NOTICE> [Engine]Engine#1 entry 256 reaction rule-m6e33ja3:S-1q2f1j0p: [Error] terminated [parent terminating] [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.683Z <Engine:CRIT> Error: terminated [parent terminating] Error: terminated at Engine._process_reaction_queue (C:\Users\Jalan\msr\reactor\server\lib\Engine.js:1644:47) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.699Z <Engine:NOTICE> [Engine]Engine#1 entry 254 reaction rule-m6e33ja3:S: [Error] terminated [preempted by rule state change] [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.699Z <Engine:CRIT> Error: terminated [preempted by rule state change] Error: terminated at Engine._process_reaction_queue (C:\Users\Jalan\msr\reactor\server\lib\Engine.js:1644:47) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.700Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights OFF<RESET>" (rule-m6e33ja3:R) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.704Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights OFF<RESET> (rule-m6e33ja3:R) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:04:39.705Z <Engine:INFO> Lights OFF<RESET> all actions completed. [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.822Z <Rule:INFO> Lights ON (rule-m6e4ajh7 in Atrium Lights) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET! [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.831Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "Lights ON<RESET>" (rule-m6e4ajh7:R) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.847Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction Lights ON<RESET> (rule-m6e4ajh7:R) [latest-25016]2025-01-26T22:05:48.847Z <Engine:INFO> Lights ON<RESET> all actions completed.
Hi @toggledbits
I found this very old post that talked about a way to limit device reading to avoid the throttled problem, because it's not a question of logic, it's that the device actually sends a lot of information, in my case the NUT ups installed in HE.
https://smarthome.community/topic/687/flapping-device?_=1737652139854
It mentions engine section of reactor.yaml by setting update_rate_limit, but I looked in the current MSR documentation and I can't find this information, so I don't know if it's still valid, its effect and parameters.
My situation is simple, when I have a UPS problem the NUT is sending dozens of reports per second and then I have the throttled problem. The same rule applies when the power is normal.
This is the rule, and the parameter that fails is the Tripp Lite UPS status.
cf9ddabf-3144-4e5a-80a4-0dc7664b9573-image.png
a813a077-974e-4737-897c-e383085b3d8f-image.png
All error is the same scenario.
[latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:32.753Z <Rule:WARN> (13) NUT Disconected (rule-l4djr0p7 in Warning) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Throttl> [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:32.756Z <Rule:WARN> (27) Falta de Energia (rule-l4h9ceod in Warning) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Thrott> [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:32.769Z <Rule:WARN> (73) UPS Battery Low (rule-l4hj850o in Warning) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Throttl> [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:32.772Z <Rule:WARN> (74) UPS Comm Fail (rule-l4kbs5cp in Warning) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Throttlin> [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:32.776Z <Rule:WARN> (76) UPS Utility Back (rule-l4hjhs6m in Warning) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Thrott> [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:32.780Z <Rule:WARN> UPS On Battery (rule-l4hjuka5 in Datacenter) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Throttling> [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:32.781Z <Rule:WARN> UPS Info (rule-l4gheo63 in Datacenter) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Throttling... [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:40.757Z <Rule:WARN> (13) NUT Disconected (rule-l4djr0p7 in Warning) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Throttl> [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:40.759Z <Rule:WARN> (27) Falta de Energia (rule-l4h9ceod in Warning) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Thrott> [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:40.776Z <Rule:WARN> (73) UPS Battery Low (rule-l4hj850o in Warning) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Throttl> [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:40.777Z <Rule:WARN> (74) UPS Comm Fail (rule-l4kbs5cp in Warning) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Throttlin> [latest-25016]2025-01-23T12:01:40.778Z <Rule:WARN> (76) UPS Utility Back (rule-l4hjhs6m in Warning) update rate 121/min exceeds limit (120/min)! Logic loop? Thrott>Thanks.
Hello -
Long time. Hope everyone is good.
I have a rule that looks at a number of temperature sensors around the house. It simply sends a general alert if any of them fall below their threshold. (A basic “House is too cold” alert for when we’re away)
Generally, this has worked well. But I was wondering if there’s a way to make the message somewhat dynamic without creating separate rules for each sensor.
E.g. “House is too cold due to Sump Temperature below 45 degrees.”
I thought I remember reading about someone doing this in the past but couldn’t find it.
Thanks for any ideas!
[SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating
-
I installed a new iblind this evening and it is appearing in ZWaveJS. It is operational thru Home Assistant just fine. It is operational thru the HA ZwaveJS plugin just fine.
Where it is non-responsive is in MSR for some reason. The entities are there. Adding the node to a Reaction and then attempting to run said Reaction nets me this:
[latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:33:08.454Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:655> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs _apply_value motion_sensor.state=false [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:33:08.455Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:722> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting Binary Sensor#zwavejs>11-0.x_zwave_values.Binary_Sensor_Motion to false [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:33:08.692Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:360> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs handling node event statistics updated entity Binary Sensor#zwavejs>11-0 [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:23.960Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing cover.open on Cover#zwavejs>20-0 with [Object]{ } [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:23.962Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:1843> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs no implementation mapped; attempting default [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:25.062Z <ZWaveJSController:INFO> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs performing zwave_device.refresh on Cover#zwavejs>20-0 with [Object]{ } **[latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:25.063Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:1843> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs no implementation mapped; attempting default** [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:25.065Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:294> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs sending #1694151625064<9/8/2023, 1:40:25 AM>: [Object]{ "command": "node.refresh_values", "nodeId": 20, "messageId": 1694151625064 } [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.307Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:360> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs handling node event statistics updated entity Cover#zwavejs>20-0 [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.317Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:360> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs handling node event value updated entity Cover#zwavejs>20-0 [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.318Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:667> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 20 value "0:128:level:" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 20, "args": { "commandClassName": "Battery", "commandClass": 128, "property": "level", "endpoint": 0, "newValue": 100, "prevValue": 100, "propertyName": "level" } } [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.319Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:684> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs updating attributes for node 20 value "0:128:level:"=100: [Array][ "battery_power.level", "battery_power.since" ] [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.320Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:698> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs updating attribute battery_power.level with [Object]{ "entity": "20-0", "impl": { "expr": "float( value ) / 100", "valueId": "128:level:" } } [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.321Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:591> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs _apply_value entity Cover#zwavejs>20-0 battery_power.level [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.322Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:655> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs _apply_value battery_power.level=1 [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.323Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:698> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs updating attribute battery_power.since with [Object]{ "entity": "20-0", "impl": { "expr": "time()", "valueId": "128:level:" } } [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.323Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:591> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs _apply_value entity Cover#zwavejs>20-0 battery_power.since [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.324Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:655> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs _apply_value battery_power.since=1694151626324<9/8/2023, 1:40:26 AM> [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.325Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:722> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting Cover#zwavejs>20-0.x_zwave_values.Battery_level to 100 [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.333Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:360> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs handling node event value updated entity Cover#zwavejs>20-0 [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.334Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:667> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs update node 20 value "0:128:isLow:" data [Object]{ "source": "node", "event": "value updated", "nodeId": 20, "args": { "commandClassName": "Battery", "commandClass": 128, "property": "isLow", "endpoint": 0, "newValue": false, "prevValue": false, "propertyName": "isLow" } } [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.336Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:324> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs request 1694151625064<9/8/2023, 1:40:25 AM> (node.refresh_values) success notification [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.337Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:684> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs updating attributes for node 20 value "0:128:isLow:"=false: [Array][ ] [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.338Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:722> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs setting Cover#zwavejs>20-0.x_zwave_values.Battery_isLow to false [latest-23242]2023-09-08T05:40:26.558Z <ZWaveJSController:5:ZWaveJSController.js:360> ZWaveJSController#zwavejs handling node event statistics updated entity Cover#zwavejs>20-0Please note the highlighted logpart - no other iblind has this. In addition, in MSR>Entities several show as
nullrather than having a value as the others do.
I tried deleting all Entities associated with this device from MSR and then refreshing ZWaveJS in Home Assistant and restarting MSR - the Entities return but in the same state/s.
Admittedly, it's been a very long three weeks at work - I could have missed something obvious during setup but I sure can't figure what it is.
-
Can you paste all of the attributes for
zwavejs>20-0? There's a "Copy Attributes" button when you expand the entity in the Entities list. Remember to format it as code when pasting here.I'm heading to a field training exercise, so I may not get a chance to look at this in depth until late Sunday.
-
@toggledbits As requested:
battery_power.since=1694178019327 cover.state=null position.value=null x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Cover","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=17;deviceClass.specific.key=7","capabilities":["cover","toggle","position"],"primary_attribute":"cover.state","description":"Window Blind Controller","model":"iblinds V3","default_name":"Window Blind Controller","values":[{"valueId":"38:currentValue:","capabilities":{"cover":{"attributes":{"state":{"expr":"!(value == 0 || value >= 99)"}},"actions":{"open":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":50},"close":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":99},"stop":false}},"position":{"attributes":{"value":{"expr":"round( value / 99, 2 )"}},"actions":{"set":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( parameters.value ?# 0 ), 0 ) ) )"}},"increase":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"decrease":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) - ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"relative":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}}}},"toggle":{"actions":{"toggle":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":{"expr":"entity.attributes.cover.state ? 99 : 50"}}}}}}],"manufacturerId":647,"productType":4,"productId":113} x_zwave_values.Battery_isLow=false x_zwave_values.Battery_level=100 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Close_Interval=15 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Default_ON_Value=50 x_zwave_values.Configuration_MC=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Maximum_Tilt_Level=99 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Minimum_Tilt_Level=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Movement_Duration=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Override_Response_to_ON_Command=null x_zwave_values.Configuration_Remote_Calibration=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Reset_Button=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Reverse_Direction=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Send_Reports=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_3=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_4=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_5=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_identify=true x_zwave_values.Indicator_timeout=null x_zwave_values.Indicator_value=null x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=647 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=114 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=4 x_zwave_values.Version_applicationBuildNumber=43707 x_zwave_values.Version_applicationFrameworkAPIVersion="3.12.1" x_zwave_values.Version_applicationFrameworkBuildNumber=35 x_zwave_values.Version_applicationVersion="3.12.1" x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["3.12"] x_zwave_values.Version_hardwareVersion=2 x_zwave_values.Version_hostInterfaceBuildNumber=0 x_zwave_values.Version_hostInterfaceVersion="unused" x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=3 x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="7.12" x_zwave_values.Version_sdkVersion="7.12.2" x_zwave_values.Version_zWaveProtocolBuildNumber=35 x_zwave_values.Version_zWaveProtocolVersion="7.12.2" x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_currentValue_23=0 x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_duration_23={"value":0,"unit":"seconds"} x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_levelChangeDown_23=false x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_levelChangeUp_23=true x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_targetValue_23=0 zwave_device.capabilities=[106,112,114,128,134,135] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=false zwave_device.generic_class="Multilevel Switch" zwave_device.impl_sig="23052:1:23093:1" zwave_device.is_beaming=false zwave_device.is_listening=false zwave_device.is_routing=true zwave_device.is_secure=false zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[647,4,114] zwave_device.max_data_rate=null zwave_device.node_id=20 zwave_device.specific_class="Motor Control Class C" zwave_device.status=4 zwave_device.status_text="alive" zwave_device.version_info=[null,"3.12.1"]I may try removing the device completely and repairing if you think that might have benefit.
-
Look at the file called
647.yamlinext/ZWaveJSController/manufacturerand check the version. It should be 23093. And yourext/ZWaveJSController/zwave_devices.yamlfile should be version 23194.If these numbers don't match up, update your ZWaveJSController.
Download: https://reactor.toggledbits.com/download/extras/ZWaveJSController/
-
Also, did you restart Reactor after adding the node?
-
@toggledbits Answering in reverse order: yes on restart of MSR (multiple times). Also reloaded the HA ZWaveJS plugin as well as restarted HA as a whole.
The the first ask:
647.yamlmanufacturer_id: 647 manufacturer_name: "HAB Home Intelligence, LLC" version: 23093 revision: 1 format: 1and I do not have a
ext/ZWaveJSController/zwave_devices.yamlbut do have aext/ZWaveJSController/zwavejs_devices.yamland it showsversion: 23052 revision: 1 format: 1Looking in my files I see the latest version was 23093 so I'm grabbing 23094 from your repo and installing now.
-
Looks like your Hass devices aren't actually faring much better... nulls there too for some values, and that's a straight pass from Hass itself, not likely something MSR is doing (or not doing).
Something off about this device. I'm going to PM you instructions to upload a data file from your system.
-
@toggledbits Ok, release deployed.
ext/ZWaveJSController/zwavejs_devices.yamlnow showsversion: 23194 revision: 1 format: 1647.yamlstill showsmanufacturer_id: 647 manufacturer_name: "HAB Home Intelligence, LLC" version: 23093 revision: 1 format: 1Node attributes:
battery_power.since=1694192043559 cover.state=null position.value=null x_debug.dt={"entity_class":"Cover","match":"deviceClass.generic.key=17;deviceClass.specific.key=7","capabilities":["cover","toggle","position"],"primary_attribute":"cover.state","description":"Window Blind Controller","model":"iblinds V3","default_name":"Window Blind Controller","values":[{"valueId":"38:currentValue:","capabilities":{"cover":{"attributes":{"state":{"expr":"!(value == 0 || value >= 99)"}},"actions":{"open":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":50},"close":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":99},"stop":false}},"position":{"attributes":{"value":{"expr":"round( value / 99, 2 )"}},"actions":{"set":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( parameters.value ?# 0 ), 0 ) ) )"}},"increase":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"decrease":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) - ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}},"relative":{"valueId":"38:targetValue","value":{"expr":"max( 0, min( 99, round( 100 * ( ( entity.attributes.position?.value ?# 0 ) + ( parameters.amount ?# 0.10 ) ), 0 ) ) )"}}}},"toggle":{"actions":{"toggle":{"valueId":"38:targetValue:","value":{"expr":"entity.attributes.cover.state ? 99 : 50"}}}}}}],"manufacturerId":647,"productType":4,"productId":113} x_zwave_values.Battery_isLow=false x_zwave_values.Battery_level=100 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Close_Interval=15 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Default_ON_Value=50 x_zwave_values.Configuration_MC=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Maximum_Tilt_Level=99 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Minimum_Tilt_Level=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Movement_Duration=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Override_Response_to_ON_Command=null x_zwave_values.Configuration_Remote_Calibration=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Reset_Button=0 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Reverse_Direction=1 x_zwave_values.Configuration_Send_Reports=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_3=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_4=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_Node_Identify_5=0 x_zwave_values.Indicator_identify=true x_zwave_values.Indicator_timeout=null x_zwave_values.Indicator_value=null x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_manufacturerId=647 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productId=114 x_zwave_values.Manufacturer_Specific_productType=4 x_zwave_values.Version_applicationBuildNumber=43707 x_zwave_values.Version_applicationFrameworkAPIVersion="3.12.1" x_zwave_values.Version_applicationFrameworkBuildNumber=35 x_zwave_values.Version_applicationVersion="3.12.1" x_zwave_values.Version_firmwareVersions=["3.12"] x_zwave_values.Version_hardwareVersion=2 x_zwave_values.Version_hostInterfaceBuildNumber=0 x_zwave_values.Version_hostInterfaceVersion="unused" x_zwave_values.Version_libraryType=3 x_zwave_values.Version_protocolVersion="7.12" x_zwave_values.Version_sdkVersion="7.12.2" x_zwave_values.Version_zWaveProtocolBuildNumber=35 x_zwave_values.Version_zWaveProtocolVersion="7.12.2" x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_currentValue_23=0 x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_duration_23={"value":0,"unit":"seconds"} x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_levelChangeDown_23=false x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_levelChangeUp_23=true x_zwave_values.Window_Covering_targetValue_23=0 zwave_device.capabilities=[106,112,114,128,134,135] zwave_device.endpoint=0 zwave_device.failed=false zwave_device.generic_class="Multilevel Switch" zwave_device.impl_sig="23194:1:23093:1" zwave_device.is_beaming=false zwave_device.is_listening=false zwave_device.is_routing=true zwave_device.is_secure=false zwave_device.manufacturer_info=[647,4,114] zwave_device.max_data_rate=null zwave_device.node_id=20 zwave_device.specific_class="Motor Control Class C" zwave_device.status=4 zwave_device.status_text="alive" zwave_device.version_info=[null,"3.12.1"](Did a manual restart via
Tools>Restartafter the deploy as well. -
Yeah, this device is off. It's reporting
Multilevel Switchfor its generic class, andMotor Control Class Cas the more specific, and usually this device class reports command class 38, Multilevel Switch. That's how your other iBlinds units that identify the same way (same 647 manufacturer ID, product type 4, product ID 114) work. But this particular unit does not appear to be advertising command class 38 Multilevel Switch, and is instead reporting command class 106 Window Covering, which is relatively new.Once you upload the data I PM'd you about, I'll be curious to see how the reporting firmware compares. But this new unit is definitely working differently from everything else you have, and it doesn't look like HA actually likes it any better -- I think that's why it's reporting the slats angle in HA as
null; I bet it shows the same in their dashboard.I'll know more/confirm once I see you data. Probably won't get to that until Sunday or Monday at this point, though.
-
@toggledbits file has been uploaded. This blind is in a guest room that's not in use currently - no rush.
Do you think excluding/including with HA/ZWjs would have any effect? Could something have gone sideways during pairing that a complete redo might clear?
-
ZWaveJSController version 23254 has been released. It should handle your oddball iBlinds unit. I'd love to know (not from you, from the manufacturer) what triggers the difference between reporting status in command class 38 versus command class 106 -- only this most recent unit of yours reports/controls via 106; all of the others use 38. And there's no difference in reported model or firmware version. No obvious configuration parameter that might trigger such a difference (e.g. some others, like some Aeotec devices, can change the reporting CC based on a config parameter). Just goes to show you that despite a fairly strict standard and specification, manufacturers can continue to make subtle choices that create headaches.
-
@toggledbits this was deployed and tests as working. Really appreciate it - I bought two new units and have held off installing the second until it was determined not to be a firmware problem (broken vs them just randomly changing something).
Thank you!
-
@toggledbits I contacted iblinds Support. This was their response:
*We've had similar reports. I believe it is related to a recent update with Home Assistant supporting the Z-Wave Window Covering Command Class now. So when you add your new devices they are seen with the new command class. I would imagine if you excluded and included one of the older motors they would now be Window Covering devices as opposed to multi-level switches.
We initially worked with the ZWaveJS developer when they added the Window Covering CC Support. But unfortunately, our HA in our lab is no longer working so we have been unable to test locally.
We have been waiting to get a replacement RPi so hopefully we can do some testing on our end soon.
I hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Eric B.
The iblinds Team*Further, I just discovered if I do a
reinterviewon an existing blind via ZWaveJS in HA it switches to this new Window Covering mode. -
@gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:
Further, I just discovered if I do a
reinterviewon an existing blind via ZWaveJS in HA it switches to this new Window Covering mode.For what it's worth, I have both v2 and v3.1 iBlinds in my home. Reinterviewing only changes the type from multilevel switches to window covering on v3.1 blinds. Version 2 blinds remain multilevel switches after reinterviewing.
The Window Covering class is supposedly better. The MLS class is designed for rolling blinds, so on/off will have the bllinds all the way open, or all the way off. With horizonal blinds, the 0/100 values are just 180 degree opposites of a closed blind. With Window Covering class, I believe there are values to tell the Z-Wave system what type of blind it is, and specify what is open versus closed. I dealt with iBlinds support maybe 4 or 5 months ago, and at the time, no Z-Wave system supported Window Covering. Zwave JS implemented the change shortly thereafter.
-
@tamorgen I'm poking at it now. It seems for the iblinds I can now use
cover.closeand the[0] NO (default)setting for direction vs having it set to[1] YESto make it tilt the way I want it to when closed.I was using
power_switch.offpreviously to close my v3.1's. -
UPDATE: after many lost hours last night/this morning (hello, 0230 ET, looking at you) I found
cover.xandpower_switch.xto be woefully unreliable after reinterviewing the blinds.What has proven reliable is
position.setfor which I use0forclosed,50foropenand have the blinds (as they were previously) set to[1] YESforReverse Direction. -
I've been using the ID hass>cover_blind_horizontal_slats_angle and x_hass_cover.open_cover_tilt or x_haas_cover.close_cover_tilt and it works flawlessly for open and close. If I want to set the position for partial close when the sun is glarring into the room, I use x_hass_cover.set_cover_tilt_position with the same ID, and set the tilt_position to whatever I want to reduce the glare.
My only problem now is that I use mushroom for my dashboard in Home Assistant, and the templates for covers hasn't caught up with the new Window Covering class. It makes adjusting the blinds more problematic from HA.
-
@gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:
UPDATE: after many lost hours last night/this morning (hello, 0230 ET, looking at you) I found cover.x and power_switch.x to be woefully unreliable after reinterviewing the blinds.
Can you please be more descriptive here? I don't have these devices, so I can't test them, but that doesn't mean I'm not interested in getting them working reliably. But the description given isn't enough for me to do any troubleshooting at all.
-
@toggledbits of course, no problem! I cannot seem to upload images into this response. I've uploaded to your Dropbox shared folder a pair of images.
Using the iblind I sent you logs and such for previously as the example, I have a blind called
Beach Blind(two guest rooms, one is named Ocean, the other Beach). I use the commands from the IDBeach Blindfromzwavejs. As @tamorgen notes, there is also a new one (with the changes HA made) from my HASS controller calledBeach Blind Horizontal Slates Anglewhich has a few less commands including those mentioned starting withx_hass_*.I use the ZwaveJSController commands.
cover.open
cover.close
power_switch.on
power_switch.off
position.set
zwave_device.refresh
zwave_device.set_configThese are the ones I most commonly use to open, close, and tilt the blinds.
refreshis used to force HA to update dasheboards with any changes andset_configI use less often, weekly, to recalibrate the blinds as they do wander sometimes and "open" becomes "open-ish".I'd been using
power_switch.onto open andcover.closeto close. The blinds have been happiest that way. With these new changes from HA, these commands have become hit/miss. In the HA ZWaveJS plugin the status would reflect0/closedbut the blind was clearly wide open.Last night/this morning I opted to use
position.setand it's been pretty solid from what I've seen throughout the day.
position.set=0nets me a closed blind,position.set=.5nets me a wide open/"slates level with the ground" blind. I usedposition.set=.2or.3to tilt the sun away during specific dayparts based on sun azimuth.I did not grab MSR logs during those tests - apologies, it was 0200 ET and I just wanted the blinds closed for the night. I have amassed 13 of these iblinds over the past couple years.
If you wish, I'll set some time tonight or tomorrow night and generate some MSR logs.
-
@gwp1 said in [SOLVED] New iblind and zwaveJScontroller/MSR not communicating:
With these new changes from HA, these commands have become hit/miss.
To be precise, it's not so much a change from HA, but from ZWaveJS. They're recognizing a new command class that the developers at iBlinds actually recommend.
I don't believe the old power switch commands work with the new command class. When I go into a specific device in ZwaveJS, the switch type devices are greyed out.
if you go into the switch, it shows it as unavailable.
I would guess the power on/off cover.close / cover.open are remnants and probably need to be removed.