After the veralert service was shut down and Richard confirmed that it will not be available again, I searched for a new notification service to use in my vere secure. I signed up for the PushOver service.
I want to take a snapshot from a camera with camera snapshot address “192.168.4.37/img/snapshot.cgi?size=4&quality=1” and video address “192.168.4.37/img/video.mjpeg” according to a trigger.
Actually, someone (Tlex) did a work about this years ago on the vera forum, but I couldn't understand that script. I also wrote to him to be more descriptive, but I didn't get an answer. Can you help me with this?
Let's assume you have done the following:
Downloaded and installed Z-Way following these instructions. No Zway license is required to do the following.
The software is now all up and running with your UZB stick (whole other post).
Dial up this Zway web page: http://<Zway_server_IP_address>:8083/expert/#/network/controller
Under the heading "Firmware" take note of the "SDK version" and the "Serial API Version". Say they equal 6.71.01 & 05.23 respectively like it shows here.
Now on to Vera:
Go to the Vera UI --> Z-Wave Settings and taken note of the "Version" shown for Vera's internal Zwave IC. For example purposes, say it equals "6.01".
You plug your UZB stick into Vera.
In the Z-Wave Settings you set the port to "/dev/ttyACM0"
You've rebooted Vera, so that it starts using the UZB stick.
OK, so what "Version" will Vera now display and the version of what? The version shown by Vera is the "Z-Wave protocol" version or the "Serial API" version - it's unclear which but I suspect the former. However on most occasions the numbers are the same. It's not the Software Developers Kit (SDK) version number.
Knowing the UZB firmware version you can identify what Vera will show with the following table.
From the example above: Zway stated the version as 5.23. It will show in Vera as version 4.61 - see table. However the Vera internals showed up as 6.01. So using this method to copy the Zwave configuration to the stick will not work, as the stick represents a downgrade and you can only do same to same or upgrades. So in this case you need to update the stick firmware from 5.23 to 5.32 as a minimum. Then the stick will show up in Vera with version of 6.01.
Which is great. So you then use the Zway software to upgrade the stick firmware. And that's the last you hear from it because this happens:
"Sorry to inform you, but there is a known issue in some UZB manufactured by our partners on license base that after upgrade they become bricked."
And you have to do this to unbrick it. So time to try someone else's stick. Sigh.
ZWay UZB version
Vera version
SDK version
5.39
6.09
6.82.01
6.08
6.82.00
6.07
6.81.06
6.06
6.81.05
6.05
6.81.04
6.04
6.81.03
6.03
6.81.02
5.37
6.02
6.81.01
5.36
6.02???
6.81.00 ????
5.33
6.02???
6.81.00 ????
5.32
6.01
6.81.00
5.03
6.71.03
5.02
6.71.02
5.27 BL 48059
4.61
6.71.0?
5.26
4.61
6.71.0?
5.23
4.61
6.71.01
4.6
6.71.00
5.2
4.6?
6.7?.00
5.16
4.6?
6.70.00
4.62
6.61.01
4.33
6.61.00
4.54
6.51.10
5.07
4.38
6.51.09
4.34
6.51.08
4.24
6.51.07
4.05
6.51.06
5.06
4.01
6.51.04
3.99
6.51.03
3.95
6.51.02
3.92
6.51.01
3.83
6.51.00
3.79
6.50.01
3.71
6.50.00
3.67
3.35
6.10.00
3.41
6.02.00
3.37
6.01.03
2.78
The table is based on page 434 of silabs app INS13954 and the UZB firmware revision information found here. The table may have errors!
The vera can run both its zwave and zigbee network off of external USB radios instead of the onboard ones. This could have advantages in terms of portability, facilitating migrations or recoveries in case the vera craps out. It could also enable testing of newer radio firmwares.
Zwave is pretty straightforward as its serial API is standardized and the protocol is the same regardless of what brand of USB stick you use. I have run my vera off of USB sticks of various brands for years going from Aeotec, Zooz, Homeseer and even the most generic silabs/Sigma Design. You just insert the stick in the usb port, find out which serial port it created (under the /dev/ folder) and use that port (ie. /dev/ttyACM0, /dev/ttyUSB0 etc) in the zwave advance menu.
Zigbee is a little trickier as the protocol and chipset was not quite as standardized as zwave. The vera only works with ember Znet protocol and you will need to find a usb stick with an EM35x chip in it which already has an ember zigbee firmware loaded. One example of such a stick is the Go Control HUSBZB1 (dual zwave-zigbee stick). The port is not readily accessible on the vera UI but can be accessed either through editing of the /etc/cmh/user-data.json or through ALTUI by going into the hidden zigbee radio device through the "table devices " menu and changing modifying the port variable there.
You can also upgrade the onboard zwave and zigbee radio firmwares from the command line SSH...
Good morning all,
I've got a stable Home Assistant running on a RPI 4 with a Aeotec Z-Stick 7 Plus, and of course the Z-wave JS integration. I've manually moved a handful of devices, and I'm overall much happier with the HA z-wave capability than I am with Vera. There are still some things I'm trying to figure out that I have in Vera that I'm not sure how they'll work in HA, but no deal breakers.
I've got all of my automation on MSR and off of luup Reactor, so really the only thing left for me is to migrate my Z-wave network. I saw @rafale77's post about using a Zwave.me UZB1 to Zway, but of course that's not what I'm using.
Is there a similar method that I can use my Aeotec Z-Stick 7 plus to Home Assistant? I have around 70 Z-wave devices (give or take devices that generate multiple instances in Vera), so manual unpairing, including, etc, would be quite a chore.
So ... I am trying to do the following:
Current setup:
Vera Plus (1.7.4955) Zwave only -> HASSIO VM (full control via Vera Integration)
Future Target:
HASSIO VM (leveraging zwave.me UZB1 dongle via USB)
I have done the following so far:
Updated UZB1 dongle (via RPi SmartHome) to latest 5.39 Firmware
I followed the following steps to try and migrate my existing Z-Wave NW (currently on Vera) onto the UZB1 dongle following the steps listed here:
Migrate from Vera to Z-way
Problem:
Steps 1-3: went fine (although the dumps are labeled as dongle.6.1.dump.x)
Step 4: went fine and the UZB1 was recognized as it should be (per dmesg)
Step 5: updating the port to /dev/ttyACM0 went fine, although I didn't see any indication of luup reload (or a save button for that matter when updating the port mapping)
Step 6: I did the touch for dongle.restore, but wasn't sure where to trigger a luup reload (I assumed it was Z-Wave Settings > Advanced > Reload Engine). I believe I got an error message when trying to do that step
Step 7: verify dongle.restore.go I don't recall being in the directions when I was going the test, but I rebooted
Post Reboot: None of my previous z-wave devices were listed. I also checked dmesg via ssh and noticed the following items:
[ 4.328000] Unsupported Device!
[ 4.328000] Vendor=658 ProdID=200
[ 4.328000] Manufacturer= Product=
I saw that item a couple times which almost seems like Vera is blocking the UZB1 or at least complaining about it.
I ended up switching the Z-Wave back to the embedded controller, and restoring configuration from backup.
Any suggestions what I did wrong??
Having trouble getting a Vera 3 to recognise a Z-Wave.Me UZB stick.
WinSCP indicates it's mounted at /dev/ttyACM0, so the Vera Z-Wave settings were adjusted to match. On a Luup engine reload Vera UI states: "ZWave : Failed To Start". Ditto for a complete Vera reboot.
Has anyone successfully used a UZB stick with a Vera 3?
Hello Everyone,
I am using iPhone locator on Vera, and yesterday it stopped working. Looking at the logs, I can see the connection is refused, but nothing on my end changed. iPhone locator is really important in my particular setup, so I guess I have two questions.
Is it broken, or is it me?
I don't see anyone else saying there is an issue, but I am not sure how many people are still using it (or Vera for location) at this point. I installed it on a blank Vera test controller, same issue. It might be something with the iCloud account, but it works everywhere else.
Is there something similar on another platform?
Mainly what I would like is the ability to force a poll of iCloud location on demand. I have a bunch of triggers setup, including magnetic sensors in my driveway to sense vehicles and determine if the motion is egress or ingress. These triggers in conjunction with MSR have been a great way to double check phone location, and I would hate to lose this functionality. It looks like HA might have something with "iCloud3". Is anyone using it?
Thanks,
Mike
@akbooer said in
The only thing left on Vera is now electricity meter readers, and I simply can't find any suitable WiFi replacement.
My hem stopped reporting this august and I’ve replaced it with a Shelly EM. I’m using another one on my solar and they’re amazing fast to report and quite precise. They’re WiFi, and mqtt based. Recommended!
Long story short: I need to tweak some parameters for Fibaro Plugs, to remove frequent notifications about watts (I just need a very good approximation, in order to detect the cycle of washer/dryer), but the parameters depend on the firmware version, and I have:
271,1554,21554
and the other one has:
271,4102,0
Any help is apprreciated.
So, I recently added Pi-Hole (pi-hole.net) to my networked clients for its open-sourced Ad and Tracker Blocking. Essentially, it’s a DNS Blacklisting solution and it can display the Domains being accessed.
To my dismay I’m seeing the VERA+ attempting calls to facebook.com on a regular basis between 20 – 70 minutes each.
The Active apps on VERA are Sercomm IP Camera, Amazon Alexa Helper, Garage Door, Foscam HD, Reator, SiteSensor and Ezlo Cameras. I just recently removed AltUI before disconnecting from the cloud services.
Any ideas on how I could track down the culprit caller?
Thanks for your consideration.
I've got a Nokia/Withings bathroom scale on which I weigh myself daily. I used to use IFTTT to push every weighing result into a Google Spreadsheet in the cloud, but now that I use MSR, I'm more interested in integrating this data into that workflow.
Has anyone figured out a way to move data from a WiFi-connected scale into the Vera environment? I don't mind trying something indirect, as for instance I've already linked the weights over to my Google Fit app.
Open to suggestions!
Recently I have been getting constant reloads on my Vera Plus running the latest 7.32 beta build. It usually starts after a 3-4 day Luup uptime and the reloads start at around 5am local time and keep going every 30 mins until I physically restart my Vera Plus (unplugging and plugging it back in). Right before a reload I see on the status bar above the modes on the homepage "cannot write user data" then after a few minutes a reload occurs. Looking into the logs I have seen mention of 03 06/21/21 8:53:18.102 JobHandler_LuaUPnP::Reload: low memory Critical 1 m_bCriticalOnly 0 dirty data 1 running 1 <0x76aa7520> almost every single time a reload happens. I have attached logs from 2 instances this morning where a reload happened. I have noticed that the OpenSprinkler plugin has been very chatty even though I have set debugging to 0, is that what is filling up temp log system?
01 06/21/21 8:45:58.123 IOPort::Connect connect -1 192.168.8.43:23 <0x6a148520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.031 UserData::CommitToDatabase data size 1244271 1244271 <0x7662b520>
01 06/21/21 8:45:59.333 UserData::WriteUserData saved--before move File Size: 234865 save size 234865 <0x7662b520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.333 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 0 <0x7662b520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.334 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure (not failure, only WriteUserData) 0 <0x7662b520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.334 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x7662b520>
01 06/21/21 8:45:59.341 UserData::WriteUserData failed File Size: 234865 save size 234902 <0x7662b520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.342 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 1 <0x7662b520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.344 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x7662b520>
01 06/21/21 8:45:59.632 UserData::WriteUserData failed result:1 size2:234865 vs 234865 <0x7662b520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.632 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 1 <0x7662b520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.634 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x7662b520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.635 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 0 <0x7662b520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.635 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure (not failure, only WriteUserData) 0 <0x7662b520>
02 06/21/21 8:45:59.636 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x7662b520>
06 06/21/21 8:45:59.636 Device_Variable::m_szValue_set device: 1 service: urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZWaveNetwork1 variable: NetStatusID was: 1 now: 2 #hooks: 0 upnp: 0 skip: 0 v:0x1099d38/NONE duplicate:0 <0x7662b520>
06 06/21/21 8:45:59.637 Device_Variable::m_szValue_set device: 1 service: urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZWaveNetwork1 variable: NetStatusText was: OK now: Resetting ZWave Network #hooks: 0 upnp: 0 skip: 0 v:0x1a02d48/NONE duplicate:0 <0x7662b520>
06 06/21/21 8:45:59.637 Device_Variable::m_szValue_set device: 2 service: urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZigbeeNetwork1 variable: NetStatusID was: 0 now: 3 #hooks: 0 upnp: 0 skip: 0 v:(nil)/NONE duplicate:0 <0x7662b520>
06 06/21/21 8:45:59.638 Device_Variable::m_szValue_set device: 2 service: urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZigbeeNetwork1 variable: NetStatusText was: OK now: GET_LANG(resetting_zigbee_network,Resetting Zigbee Network) #hooks: 0 upnp: 0 skip: 0 v:0x12b9e60/NONE duplicate:0 <0x7662b520>
01 06/21/21 8:45:59.648 RAServerSync::SendAlert notification lost quit 1 device 50002761 servers:vera-us-oem-event12.mios.com/vera-us-oem-event11.mios.com for time 23822220 type 7 code user_data <0x7642b520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.381 UserData::CommitToDatabase data size 1244349 1244349 <0x770dc320>
01 06/21/21 8:46:01.675 UserData::WriteUserData saved--before move File Size: 234875 save size 234875 <0x770dc320>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.675 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 0 <0x770dc320>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.676 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure (not failure, only WriteUserData) 0 <0x770dc320>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.676 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x770dc320>
01 06/21/21 8:46:01.680 UserData::WriteUserData failed File Size: 234875 save size 234865 <0x770dc320>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.680 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 1 <0x770dc320>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.682 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x770dc320>
01 06/21/21 8:46:01.940 UserData::WriteUserData failed result:1 size2:234875 vs 234875 <0x770dc320>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.941 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 1 <0x770dc320>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.943 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x770dc320>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.944 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 0 <0x770dc320>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.945 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure (not failure, only WriteUserData) 0 <0x770dc320>
02 06/21/21 8:46:01.945 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x770dc320>
50 06/21/21 8:46:03.102 luup_log:1304: VeraOpenSprinkler[1.50]: [updateFromController] error: false - nil - nil <0x72581520>
01 06/21/21 8:46:05.210 Main WatchDogRoutine: blocked - terminating 1 <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.211 Dumping 40 locks <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.211 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.211 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.211 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.211 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.212 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.212 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.212 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.212 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.212 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.212 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.213 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.213 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.213 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.213 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.213 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.213 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.214 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.214 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.214 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.214 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.214 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.214 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.215 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.215 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.215 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.215 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.215 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.215 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.216 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.216 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.216 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.216 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.216 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.216 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.217 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.217 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.217 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.217 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.217 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.217 OL: (0xbbc560) (>100746) Variable JobHandler_LuaUPnP.cpp l:9817 time: 4:00:00p (1624290365 s) thread: 0x6f948520 Rel: Y Got: Y <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.217 finished check for exceptions <0x695de520>
02 06/21/21 8:46:05.218 OL: (0xbbc560) (>100751) Variable JobHandler_LuaUPnP.cpp l:9817 time: 4:00:00p (1624290365 s) thread: 0x6d948520 Rel: Y Got: Y <0x695de520>
2021-06-21 08:46:05 - LuaUPnP Terminated with Exit Code: 137
03 06/21/21 8:53:18.102 JobHandler_LuaUPnP::Reload: low memory Critical 1 m_bCriticalOnly 0 dirty data 1 running 1 <0x76aa7520>
01 06/21/21 8:53:18.103 luup_log:901: Tesla Car_error: Monitor awake state, failed #400 HTTP/1.1 400 BAD REQUEST !! <0x72ffd520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:18.482 UserData::CommitToDatabase data size 1244185 1244185 <0x76aa7520>
01 06/21/21 8:53:18.781 UserData::WriteUserData saved--before move File Size: 234865 save size 234865 <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:18.781 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 0 <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:18.781 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure (not failure, only WriteUserData) 0 <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:18.782 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x76aa7520>
01 06/21/21 8:53:18.787 UserData::WriteUserData failed File Size: 234865 save size 234875 <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:18.787 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 1 <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:18.789 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x76aa7520>
01 06/21/21 8:53:18.813 IOPort::Connect connect -1 192.168.8.43:23 <0x6a7c4520>
01 06/21/21 8:53:19.020 UserData::WriteUserData failed result:1 size2:234865 vs 234865 <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:19.020 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 1 <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:19.023 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:19.027 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 0 <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:19.028 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure (not failure, only WriteUserData) 0 <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:19.028 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 0 res:0
(null) <0x76aa7520>
06 06/21/21 8:53:19.029 Device_Variable::m_szValue_set device: 1 service: urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZWaveNetwork1 variable: NetStatusID was: 1 now: 2 #hooks: 0 upnp: 0 skip: 0 v:0x14bad80/NONE duplicate:0 <0x76aa7520>
06 06/21/21 8:53:19.029 Device_Variable::m_szValue_set device: 1 service: urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZWaveNetwork1 variable: NetStatusText was: OK now: Resetting ZWave Network #hooks: 0 upnp: 0 skip: 0 v:0x1e23b10/NONE duplicate:0 <0x76aa7520>
06 06/21/21 8:53:19.033 Device_Variable::m_szValue_set device: 2 service: urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZigbeeNetwork1 variable: NetStatusID was: 0 now: 3 #hooks: 0 upnp: 0 skip: 0 v:(nil)/NONE duplicate:0 <0x76aa7520>
01 06/21/21 8:53:19.040 RAServerSync::SendAlert notification lost quit 1 device 50002761 servers:vera-us-oem-event12.mios.com/vera-us-oem-event11.mios.com for time 20546340 type 7 code user_data <0x76ca7520>
06 06/21/21 8:53:19.044 Device_Variable::m_szValue_set device: 2 service: urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZigbeeNetwork1 variable: NetStatusText was: OK now: GET_LANG(resetting_zigbee_network,Resetting Zigbee Network) #hooks: 0 upnp: 0 skip: 0 v:0x16dadc0/NONE duplicate:0 <0x76aa7520>
02 06/21/21 8:53:20.807 UserData::CommitToDatabase data size 1244263 1244263 <0x77759320>
01 06/21/21 8:53:21.081 UserData::WriteUserData saved--before move File Size: 234875 save size 234875 <0x77759320>
02 06/21/21 8:53:21.081 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 0 <0x77759320>
02 06/21/21 8:53:21.116 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure (not failure, only WriteUserData) 0 <0x77759320>
02 06/21/21 8:53:21.117 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 699 res:1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 504 Jun 26 2017 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.luup.lzo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234865 Jun 21 08:53 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234996 Jun 21 08:11 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234930 Jun 21 08:02 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234968 Jun 21 07:47 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234658 Jun 21 07:11 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234909 Jun 21 06:50 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234875 Jun 21 08:53 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.new
<0x77759320>
02 06/21/21 8:53:21.228 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure start 0 <0x77759320>
02 06/21/21 8:53:21.259 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure (not failure, only WriteUserData) 0 <0x77759320>
02 06/21/21 8:53:21.259 UserData::TempLogFileSystemFailure 610 res:1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 504 Jun 26 2017 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.luup.lzo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234875 Jun 21 08:53 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234865 Jun 21 08:53 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234996 Jun 21 08:11 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234930 Jun 21 08:02 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234968 Jun 21 07:47 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234658 Jun 21 07:11 /etc/cmh/user_data.json.lzo.5
<0x77759320>
06 06/21/21 8:53:21.465 Device_Variable::m_szValue_set device: 2 service: urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZigbeeDevice1 variable: PendingRemoveDevices was: 0024460000144655-01d8,0024460000146120-a155,00244600001467ad-a538 now: 0024460000144655-01d8,0024460000146120-a155,00244600001467ad-a538 #hooks: 0 upnp: 0 skip: 0 v:(nil)/NONE duplicate:1 <0x77759320>
06 06/21/21 8:53:21.469 Device_Variable::m_szValue_set device: 2 service: urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZigbeeDevice1 variable: UnknownDevices was: now: #hooks: 0 upnp: 0 skip: 0 v:(nil)/NONE duplicate:1 <0x77759320>
03 06/21/21 8:53:22.100 LuaUPNP: ending <0x77759320>
2021-06-21 08:53:22 - LuaUPnP Terminated with Exit Code: 0```
Migration from VeraPlus to Aeotec Gen5
Vera
18
Posts
3
Posters
2.0k
Views
3
Watching
-
I have 50ish devices in connected to Home Assistant via. VeraPlus hub. I recently picked up an Aeotec Gen5 USB stick which I have successfully integrated into Home Assistant using OpenZWave.
Can I add the Aeotec Stick as a Secondary Controller to Vera, turn off vera (making Aeotec primary) and then run natively that way on HA?
I know the entity ID's in HA will change, but a lot easier to fix vs. unpair/repair all the devices from Vera.
Will this work?
-
A couple of inputs on this:
- I know the aeotec stick looks attractive with its on board battery but... battery eventually dies and using the stick as a mobile inclusion device using your main controiller stick is not the best idea as it is supposed to be static. (look at the zwave SUC/SIS concept). I would really avoid this stick and recommend the generic stick like the homeseer one or the ones sold directly by silabs which offers much better compatibility with firmware and sdk upgrades.
- To answer you question, you could add that stick as a secondary but it would make a mess on your network since it requires a controller shift to make a controller primary. It isn't as easy as flipping a switch or a bit. The process involves an new inclusion of not included controller into the network and a shift of all the properties into that new controller which then turns the previous primary into a secondary. You can do this multiple times, shifting the primary role back and forth between the controllers to finally get the stick you want to have the node 1 position but... there is a better way which I described in my migration to z-way process. You can restore from the vera's zwave binary backup onto the usb stick which you would have plugged into the vera....
-
Hi Rafale,
I am not planning on using the stick for that purpose, but to potentially remove VERA from the equation completely.
I would be leveraging the aeotec stick plugged in full-time with my Home Assistant installation (which is NOT running on a RPi, etc.) so it would be a static deployment which would be build on the OZW 1.6 stack (in Home Assistant).
Does your migration to Z-way process (restoring the binary backup onto the stick) still work in that scenario? I would also need the existing vera NW security key which I input for the OZW startup config.
-
The migration method is designed exactly for this very use case.
My recommendation was to avoid the aeotec stick. It uses a proprietary firmware which you will not benefit from for your use case and will only be suffering from the lack of support over time as they do not offer much firmware updates. -
Hi, I think most people use the aeotec g5 stick with ozw 1.4 and latest ozw 1.6 (addon) according to the home assistant forum... I am not saying it is good, but why so many people if it were bad?
I also use it with ozw 1.6 addon. It is also recommended to not use the stick for inclusion but use the integration or vnc for inclusion.
-
I have one too. It is stuck with zwave SDK 4.5. It will never support S2 inclusion for example and it is missing support for some newer devices. It is missing a lot of bug fixes silab has released over the past few years. My generic sticks and the uzb are running 6.82.01...
-
A few suggestions since it appears that you are in the US:
This is the most generic reference design stick. It is actually also the exact same stick homeseer and many other companies resell under their label.
https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/silicon-labs/ACC-UZB3-U-STA/703-1128-ND/6111632The is the zwave.me uzb which is widely used on Home assistant and opens the door to using z-way as well.
-
I have one too. It is stuck with zwave SDK 4.5. It will never support S2 inclusion for example and it is missing support for some newer devices. It is missing a lot of bug fixes silab has released over the past few years. My generic sticks and the uzb are running 6.82.01...
@rafale77 hmz, according to them gen5 will support S2
Smart Home Products - Aeotec
Transform your home with Aeotec smart home Products and SmartThings for effortless and efficient smart home automation.
And here
Z-Stick Gen5 and security (S0 and S2 Framework)
Z-Stick Gen5 ZW090 is a highly versatile and portable device used as an interface for a third party software to be used and connected with Z-Stick Gen5. For this article we will discuss a little bit about what is needed to be done to use Z-Stick ...
-
Maybe one of these days when others have supported it for years. It's not the point. This is just a symptom, it's a proprietary firmware to accomodate the battery which is not very useful. You pay more and get a less useful stick. I have had it for years and you have to wait for aeotec to release a firmware which may or may not happen. Why bother? They have not released an update for all the years I have had mine when silabs is releasing improvements and bug fixes every couple of months. If you were not happy with vera's firmware release rate, you will be sorely disappointed with aeotec's Z-stick. And no it doesn't work. The current firmware doesn't support S2, it is much too old. The documentation is wrong. I tried. It mentions you need a controller which supports it which none does except for homeseer and z-way which don't support this stick. It was a very popular stick back at the beginning of openzwave when it was a very limited controller but I think openzwave has outgrown the firmware on this stick now.
Edit: I see a firmware update for another product called the z-stick S2. None for the Gen5 which I know for fact cannot support S2.
-
A few suggestions since it appears that you are in the US:
This is the most generic reference design stick. It is actually also the exact same stick homeseer and many other companies resell under their label.
https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/silicon-labs/ACC-UZB3-U-STA/703-1128-ND/6111632The is the zwave.me uzb which is widely used on Home assistant and opens the door to using z-way as well.
@rafale77 said in Migration from VeraPlus to Aeotec Gen5:
A few suggestions since it appears that you are in the US:
This is the most generic reference design stick. It is actually also the exact same stick homeseer and many other companies resell under their label.
https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/silicon-labs/ACC-UZB3-U-STA/703-1128-ND/6111632The is the zwave.me uzb which is widely used on Home assistant and opens the door to using z-way as well.
In regards to the Z-wave.me stick... does that also accept the SL SDK FW upgrades directly or are you going dealing with their FW as well.
-
I receive the Z-Wave.Me stick from Amazon. I installed into Rpi4b and wrote the z-way SW onto a spare SD card. Z-Way doesn't show the USB stick as being recognized.
I was able to get the following information from the board:
Device ready in:3.01858210564 seconds FULL INFO Openning port .............................. OK SERIAL INFO VERSION: 05 1B VENDOR: 01 15 ZME_CAPABILITIES UID: 25 95 B6 A0 D7 34 FA 69 67 EB BA 75 3F 4B C6 8B VENDOR: 00 00 NODES: FF FLAGS: 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FIRMWARE CRC BOOT: BB BB FW: 35 7A MISC FREQ: US NVR Content -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prog/erase lock : FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF, Read back lock: FF Rev 01, Cal FF, TXCal 16 12, SAW FF FF FF FF, Pin FF, CRC B3 B5 NMV: CS 15, TYPE 02, SIZE 01 00, PSIZE 01 00 (EEPROM M25PE20) USB: VID FF FF, PID FF FF, UUID FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FACTORY ID: WEEK 255, YEAR 255, CHIP FF FF, SER FF FF, WS 255, HWREV: FF FF, CRC8 FFDoes this look right?
-
