Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Replacing SiteSensor Plugin (Vera) with MSR
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Replacing SiteSensor Plugin (Vera) with MSR

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
91 Posts 7 Posters 32.4k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    That's easy, it has it, so all I need to do is add the menu item to the UI.

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      Great. If you filter the "Entities" list (left nav) for the "wx" capability, you should find the entity that contains your local weather data.

      G Offline
      G Offline
      gwp1
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      @toggledbits I found this:
      a66f3768-e8e4-4280-b215-ebc45ae3d696-image.png

      Oddly, the historical is returning Melgrove lol I left the config so that it would pull from the default location which is using lat/long.

      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

      *HAOS
      Core 2026.1.1
      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
      FW: v1.1
      SDK: v7.23.1

      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
      MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
      MQTTController: 25139
      ZWave Controller: 25139

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        I'm not sure where you're going with this post? Are you reporting a problem?

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          I'm not sure where you're going with this post? Are you reporting a problem?

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          @toggledbits I guess I am - unless I'm misreading the docs. I believe to have OWM set to use the default location of MSR which is Hanahan SC, not Melgrove Someplace.

          I don't want to file a bug until I'm sure it's MSR and not me.

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HAOS
          Core 2026.1.1
          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
          FW: v1.1
          SDK: v7.23.1

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            OK. In order to sort that out, I need to see your configuration for both the default system location and OWM. Post here or PM is fine.

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              OK. In order to sort that out, I need to see your configuration for both the default system location and OWM. Post here or PM is fine.

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              @toggledbits Posted via PM.

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HAOS
              Core 2026.1.1
              w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
              FW: v1.1
              SDK: v7.23.1

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                OK. Looks like all is good, OWM is just returning an odd place name (who knows what data they sourced that from), and since you are using "default" configuration (home location from Reactor main config), it's using OWM's returned name for the entity name. If you do a custom location in the OWM config, you can set the name by adding the "name" to the custom config. I'm going to extend that behavior to the default location config as well, and that will be in today's build. If you want to get it fixed before that, just add a location to your OWMController config section:

                  - id: weather
                    enabled: true
                    implementation: OWMWeatherController
                    name: OWM Weather
                    config:
                      appid: "yourappidhere"
                      locations:
                        - id: home
                          name: "My Custom Place Name"
                          latitude: nn.nnnnnn
                          longitude: nn.nnnnnn
                

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  OK. Looks like all is good, OWM is just returning an odd place name (who knows what data they sourced that from), and since you are using "default" configuration (home location from Reactor main config), it's using OWM's returned name for the entity name. If you do a custom location in the OWM config, you can set the name by adding the "name" to the custom config. I'm going to extend that behavior to the default location config as well, and that will be in today's build. If you want to get it fixed before that, just add a location to your OWMController config section:

                    - id: weather
                      enabled: true
                      implementation: OWMWeatherController
                      name: OWM Weather
                      config:
                        appid: "yourappidhere"
                        locations:
                          - id: home
                            name: "My Custom Place Name"
                            latitude: nn.nnnnnn
                            longitude: nn.nnnnnn
                  
                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  @toggledbits I'm a few nightly builds behind so I'll wait until you have tonight's out. Thanks!

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HAOS
                  Core 2026.1.1
                  w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                  FW: v1.1
                  SDK: v7.23.1

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • LibraSunL LibraSun

                    For MSR users with SiteSensor still installed back on Vera, you might want to consider letting MSR take over those duties. Here's a quick run-down of how I imported one of my SiteSensor recipes into a Rule on MSR, using OpenWeather API* as an example.

                    STEP 1: Copy the Basics from Vera
                    (a) Go to your Vera > Devices, locate SiteSensor (the main instance, not one of its children devices) and click ► for details then click SETTINGS.
                    (b) Copy and paste (into Notepad or other text editor) the Request URL along with each of the defined expressions.

                    STEP 2: Create a Rule on MSR
                    (c) Jump into Rule Sets and click "Create Rule". Click its title to rename the rule 'OpenWeather (API)" and click 'Rename'.
                    (d) Decide on appropriate Triggers (in my case, it's an OR group that includes an [INTERVAL] set to "Every 3 hours" plus a few [ENTITY ATTRIBUTE] entries reacting to things like entering/leaving home, waking up, etc.).
                    (e) In Set Reacion, create an [HTTP REQUEST] > [GET] action.
                    (f) Paste your old "Request URL" into the "Request URL" box.

                    FYI GET calls to OpenWeather API* take the form:

                    http://api.openweathermap.org/data/2.5/weather?zip=<your_ZIP_code>&id=<your_Wx_ID>&appid=<app-id>&units=imperial
                    

                    (g) Create four new blank Expressions (name them openWx, Tx, Hx and Rx).
                    (h) Click SAVE & EXIT

                    STEP 3: Process the Response
                    (i) Re-open rule "OpenWeather (API)" by clicking the 'Edit' icon.
                    (j) Within the [HTTP REQUEST] action, assign "Capture response to:" ► openWx
                    (k) Down in Expressions, click "[+]Add Expresssion" then enter the following:
                    Tx := round(openWx.main.temp,1)
                    // yields current outdoor temperature
                    Hx := round(openWx.main.humidity)
                    // yields current humidity conditions
                    Rx := openWx.rain ? ( openWx.rain['3h'] ? openWx.rain['3h'] : 0) : 0
                    // yields predicted rainfall, if present; otherwise 0
                    (l) Click SAVE & EXIT. Enjoy!

                    Naturally, your specific needs and workflow will differ from the one I've outlined here. For instance, you may wish to explore the contents of the JSON object in openWx for additional data of interest to you, and define variables to match.

                    My goal here has been to illustrate some key concepts needed for moving from SiteSensor over to MSR:

                    • Some syntax is the same, such as dot notation for object.item.access;
                    • Other syntax has changed, such as the use of ternary A ? B : C in place of IF (A, B, C);
                    • Manually setting an [INTERVAL] in lieu of SiteSensor's timed schedule;

                    Pro tip: If your workflow demands that other Rules react to the output of the "OpenWeather (API)" rule, then be sure to create all of the aforementioned Expressions under "Global Expressions" instead, so they become accessible across all Rule Sets.

                    Once the transition is complete, you can either DISARM SiteSensor on Vera or remove it entirely with "Remove Device" (which will automatically remove all of its child devices).

                    *Additional reading:
                    OpenWeather API : https://openweathermap.org/api
                    FREE SUBSCRIPTION REQUIRED TO USE THIS SERVICE

                    PRO TIP: See below for optimal way to incorporate OpenWeatherMap into your MSR workflow(s), by enabling the service directly in the reactor.yaml config file.

                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    @librasun said in Replacing SiteSensor Plugin (Vera) with MSR:

                    My goal here has been to illustrate some key concepts needed for moving from SiteSensor over to MSR

                    I never used SiteSensor plugin for Vera before.

                    Thanks for the MSR example you wrote.

                    I wanted to try this out and found this Covid-19 API here.

                    However the http command they give doesn't seem to return any results data, either just in the web browser or in my MSR rule.

                    https://covid19-api.com/country?name=UK&format=json
                    

                    52885b5e-6ae2-4454-8650-a2fb4b55eb4c-image.png

                    The curl command does work OK however

                    curl -X GET "https://covid19-api.com/country?name=UK&format=json" -H "accept: application/json"
                    

                    How do I specify the application/json in the MSR rule? Assuming the problem is related to that.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Same way. One header per line in that field.

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        Same way. One header per line in that field.

                        cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kid
                        wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                        #21

                        @toggledbits

                        In the "Request Headers" field in the "Set Reaction" I have tried the following:

                        Accept: application/json

                        and tried:

                        Content-Type: application/json

                        It allows me to save the rule but when I go back in to the rule that field is empty again and its not collecting the response data in to my empty expression / variable.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          So there are two separate issues here:

                          1. First, we need to figure out if the UI is correctly storing the headers or not, and if the problem is merely that it is not restoring/displaying them correctly when you go back into the editor. The check for that is to go into the reaction, add the headers, and save. Then, open the rule status view and it will show you the rule ID underneath the rule condition status and expressions. Go to your reactor/storage/rules directory, and grab the same-named file (with .json suffix) and post it here. Let's see what's being stored.

                          2. Look at the logs to see where the reaction is running and what the request is doing. There may be errors logged.

                          It's entirely possible that the problem is 1, 2, or even both.

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cw-kidC Offline
                            cw-kidC Offline
                            cw-kid
                            wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                            #23

                            @toggledbits

                            I cannot upload files to this forum it seems.

                            I have uploaded the rule to my One Drive here

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              OK. There's definitely two broken things in the handling of headers, so go ahead and open a PR for this. No need to post the rule there (again); I've got it and have the issue in hand, but unfortunately, it's not just a UI issue.

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • cw-kidC Offline
                                cw-kidC Offline
                                cw-kid
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                OK done

                                https://reactor.toggledbits.com/mantisbt/view.php?id=147

                                Thanks

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kid
                                  wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                                  #26

                                  OK so lets say I now have a variable in MSR that contains some data pulled down from a HTTP Request to some online API somewhere.

                                  How can I send that value / information to a Generic IO Sensor in Vera ?

                                  I know how to create a GenericIO device in Vera and I know how to send data to it from a simple HTTP command, for example this command will send the text "Hello World"

                                  http://Vera-IP/port_3480/data_request?id=lu_variableset&DeviceNum=128&serviceId=urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:GenericSensor1&Variable=CurrentLevel&Value=Hello World
                                  

                                  And here is the device in Vera:

                                  51473251-7dd4-436a-b70a-02add45a940f-image.png

                                  But how to create a rule to send the contents of an MSR variable (expression) ?

                                  LibraSunL 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • LibraSunL Offline
                                    LibraSunL Offline
                                    LibraSun
                                    wrote on last edited by LibraSun
                                    #27

                                    I'm going to assume the data was returned in JSON format? In which case MSR treats that like an object {}, whose keys can be referenced with dot notation.
                                    For example, if your variable respData stored the response {animal:"cat", clothing:"suit", food:"chow"} and you want to send the current value of the "chow" key therein, simply reference that value with respData.chow.

                                    One hurdle you may have to overcome, since the data is being fetched and stored in Rule A, but you want to reference the results in Rule B, is that you'd then have to either (a) store respData as a Global Expression, or (b) create a blank Expression in Rule B, and tell Rule A to [Set Variable] on it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cw-kidC cw-kid

                                      OK so lets say I now have a variable in MSR that contains some data pulled down from a HTTP Request to some online API somewhere.

                                      How can I send that value / information to a Generic IO Sensor in Vera ?

                                      I know how to create a GenericIO device in Vera and I know how to send data to it from a simple HTTP command, for example this command will send the text "Hello World"

                                      http://Vera-IP/port_3480/data_request?id=lu_variableset&DeviceNum=128&serviceId=urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:GenericSensor1&Variable=CurrentLevel&Value=Hello World
                                      

                                      And here is the device in Vera:

                                      51473251-7dd4-436a-b70a-02add45a940f-image.png

                                      But how to create a rule to send the contents of an MSR variable (expression) ?

                                      LibraSunL Offline
                                      LibraSunL Offline
                                      LibraSun
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      @cw-kid said in Replacing SiteSensor Plugin (Vera) with MSR:

                                      But how to create a rule to send the contents of an MSR variable (expression) ?

                                      In case you revised your question, or I misinterpreted it earlier, here goes:

                                      It sounds like you want to send data from MSR to a plug-in / virtual device / sensor over on Vera. Before you begin, go to that "device" > Advanced > Variables and determine which of its variables is intended to receive the data.

                                      Click "EDIT" next to that variable, and look for its complete "service" name in the window; copy that string for use back in MSR.

                                      Close that window on Vera, then head back over to MSR.

                                      In MSR, you will want an [ENTITY ACTION] in the Set Reaction. Choose the target device as the 'Entity' and choose "x_vera_device.set_variable" as the action.

                                      Fill out the three fields, where "service:" and "variable:" come from the string you copied earlier. For "value:" either type a constant (numeric or "text"), or a variable name properly clad in curly brackets ( e.g. ${{respData}} ) so the value gets substituted next time the Rule triggers.

                                      Hope this helps!!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • cw-kidC Offline
                                        cw-kidC Offline
                                        cw-kid
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @LibraSun

                                        That's great thanks I think you just answered my question, think I know what to do now, I will give it a try.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cw-kidC Offline
                                          cw-kidC Offline
                                          cw-kid
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          @LibraSun

                                          Its working. I now have my current WAN IP address being sent from MSR to a virtual device (Generic IO Sensor) on Vera.

                                          So now know how to send any data stored in an expression / variable from MSR to a device on Vera !

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            37

                                          • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                            S
                                            SweetGenius
                                            1
                                            1
                                            30

                                          • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            2
                                            1
                                            27

                                          • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            1
                                            60

                                          • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            4
                                            80

                                          • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            3
                                            98

                                          • Possible feature request 2?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            75

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            133
                                            80.0k

                                          • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            1
                                            9
                                            381

                                          • Copying a global reaction
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            3
                                            116

                                          • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            9
                                            450

                                          • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            168
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved