Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] HASS.OS Install
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] HASS.OS Install

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
16 Posts 5 Posters 2.8k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    vezinpi
    wrote on last edited by vezinpi
    #1

    Hi,

    Am I correct in assuming that MSR cannot be installed on a pi running HASS.OS?

    Thanks.

    Using MSR 25139 on Docker, on a Raspberry Pi with Bookworm. Home Assistant 2025.07, Z-Wave JS-UI 10.6.1

    toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V vezinpi

      Hi,

      Am I correct in assuming that MSR cannot be installed on a pi running HASS.OS?

      Thanks.

      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @vezinpi probably doable. I haven't tried it myself, but if you can install either nodejs or docker, you're almost done.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • V Offline
        V Offline
        vezinpi
        wrote on last edited by vezinpi
        #3

        Hi,

        I am just a regular user with good system understanding but I am not a software person by any means. Therefore, take the following with that in mind.

        I feel myself trapped between HASS recommanded install for a Raspberry Pi, and MSR recommanded install. They are not compatible...

        HASS recommanded install is using the Home Assistant Operating System, a controlled environment where the user do not have control over the OS. The good point, it is simple, very stable and protected against noice user like me. On the other hand it make it difficult to do anything else like installing MSR. Trough the Portainer Add-On, I manage to install the MSR container and to configure it to see my Vera and HASS devices. The problem is that the configuration is within the container and when we upgrade or remove the container, the configuration is lost.

        The fact that the standard MSR container is running just fine (beside the config) means that the configuration is compatible with HASS OS. I understand your approach (not being system dependent like Reactor was with Vera) by providing either a generic container or tar ball but it implies having a device on which we have the control over the OS. Your actual container for Pi is so close from being an official add-on I wonder if it would not worth the effort. I even see a benefit for you when trouble shooting. The Hass OS environment being almost lock, it can become somewhat of a referece when chasing down an issue with MSR. How many problem are due to the user changing something it is not supposed to. The other thing is, how many users out there, like me, are using the Pi image or the Home Assistant BLUE platform.

        I have been using (and contributed) Reactor and Virtual switches with my Vera and I definitely want to go that route with MSR and HASS. I will re-install HASS with an alternate method if I have to, but it is not my first choice if I can avoid it. Again, being just a regular user, simplicity is paramount and the HASS image was pretty good. If MSR could be an add-on, it would be fantastic.

        For your consideration.

        Thanks

        Using MSR 25139 on Docker, on a Raspberry Pi with Bookworm. Home Assistant 2025.07, Z-Wave JS-UI 10.6.1

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          You are blazing new territory by running under the packaged, container HassOS. But it sounds like you're close.

          Generically, docker containers allow you to "mount" a point in the OS' filesystem within the container; this is called a bind mount. This is the mechanism by which the configuration and log files are normally preserved outside the container on all other systems in which MSR docker containers run. In this way, replacement of the container and/or underlying image does not cause data loss (configuration, state, logs, etc.), because the data is no longer stored within the container.

          What you need to figure out is how to get the /var/reactor directory inside the container mounted to an accessible, persistent location outside the container. For example, you may create a directory in your user home directory /home/username/reactor-data, and create a bind mount that mounts that directory over /var/reactor inside the container. Portainer generically allows you to create bind mounts to places in the filesystem, so I assume this is readily possible, but not being familiar with the specifics of how HassOS handles (and more importantly, restricts) its filesystem(s), I can't give you specific guidance.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V Offline
            V Offline
            vezinpi
            wrote on last edited by vezinpi
            #5

            Hi again,

            Just thought I would provide an update on where I am at. I might also be helpfull to other people.

            As you know, I am trying to get the MSR Container work on a Pi-4, configured with the standard HASS operating system (image via balena etcher). Well I finally found a solution to data persistance between reboot. Here is what I did:

            • Installed samba add-on to get accesss to the standard Hass configuration folders

            • Installed Portainer which will be used to install MSR

            • From within Portainer, add an MSR container with the following configuration: image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-raspbian-armv7l, add a TZ variable with the proper region, restart policy define On failure, add a bind volume to map the reactor container /var/reactor to the host /mnt/data/supervisor/homeassistant/reactor. This (reactor) folder will be accessible via the samba addon under the config folder.

            • Restarted the MSR container

            The reactor.yaml configuration file is now accessible via samba under homeassistant/config/reactor/config or from a terminal sessison performed from portainer in the var/reactor/config folder.

            All seems to work for now. Devices from vera and HASS are being seen by MSR. Configuration persist trough a reboot and I was also able to import (convert using the tool provided) my configuration from Reactor. I am now in the process of making the final adjustment.

            Not sure what will the future hold but for now it is working fine.

            Many thanks for your work and support.

            Using MSR 25139 on Docker, on a Raspberry Pi with Bookworm. Home Assistant 2025.07, Z-Wave JS-UI 10.6.1

            F 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              sender
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              In hassos you can install an addon "portainer" and with the needed "settings" you can run your own dockers very easily besides the other containers (of which homeassistant is one).

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V Offline
                V Offline
                vezinpi
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Hi,

                That's what I did.See post above. The challenge was to acheive data persistence between reboot, upgrade, etc... Hass OS is pretty tight when it comes to he host file system.

                Thanks

                Using MSR 25139 on Docker, on a Raspberry Pi with Bookworm. Home Assistant 2025.07, Z-Wave JS-UI 10.6.1

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V vezinpi

                  Hi,

                  That's what I did.See post above. The challenge was to acheive data persistence between reboot, upgrade, etc... Hass OS is pretty tight when it comes to he host file system.

                  Thanks

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  sender
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @vezinpi Have you ran the container and the portainer addon in privileged mode? I have had not trouble in data persistance...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V vezinpi

                    Hi again,

                    Just thought I would provide an update on where I am at. I might also be helpfull to other people.

                    As you know, I am trying to get the MSR Container work on a Pi-4, configured with the standard HASS operating system (image via balena etcher). Well I finally found a solution to data persistance between reboot. Here is what I did:

                    • Installed samba add-on to get accesss to the standard Hass configuration folders

                    • Installed Portainer which will be used to install MSR

                    • From within Portainer, add an MSR container with the following configuration: image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-raspbian-armv7l, add a TZ variable with the proper region, restart policy define On failure, add a bind volume to map the reactor container /var/reactor to the host /mnt/data/supervisor/homeassistant/reactor. This (reactor) folder will be accessible via the samba addon under the config folder.

                    • Restarted the MSR container

                    The reactor.yaml configuration file is now accessible via samba under homeassistant/config/reactor/config or from a terminal sessison performed from portainer in the var/reactor/config folder.

                    All seems to work for now. Devices from vera and HASS are being seen by MSR. Configuration persist trough a reboot and I was also able to import (convert using the tool provided) my configuration from Reactor. I am now in the process of making the final adjustment.

                    Not sure what will the future hold but for now it is working fine.

                    Many thanks for your work and support.

                    F Offline
                    F Offline
                    Fanan
                    wrote on last edited by Fanan
                    #9

                    @vezinpi

                    1. How do I add a TZ-variable? And how do I know how my region (Sweden/Europe) is added?
                    2. My reactions seems to work, but I can't reach the Web UI. The adress in reactor.yaml doesn't work. I also tried the http://127.0.0.1:8111. Can someone point me in the right direction - what adress can it be to reach the Web UI?

                    Thanks!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • MikeReadingtonM Offline
                      MikeReadingtonM Offline
                      MikeReadington
                      wrote on last edited by MikeReadington
                      #10

                      I don't want to give you bad info, but I believe when you edit a container in Portainer, it actually deletes and publishes the edited one in place.

                      Check here.

                      Edit or duplicate a container | Portainer Documentation

                      Edit or duplicate a container | Portainer Documentation

                      Here are some screen shot from Portainer on my Synology. These are the locations you need to edit for port and TZ.

                      Screen Shot 2021-08-13 at 12.08.51 PM.png Screen Shot 2021-08-13 at 12.08.59 PM.png

                      F 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • MikeReadingtonM MikeReadington

                        I don't want to give you bad info, but I believe when you edit a container in Portainer, it actually deletes and publishes the edited one in place.

                        Check here.

                        Edit or duplicate a container | Portainer Documentation

                        Edit or duplicate a container | Portainer Documentation

                        Here are some screen shot from Portainer on my Synology. These are the locations you need to edit for port and TZ.

                        Screen Shot 2021-08-13 at 12.08.51 PM.png Screen Shot 2021-08-13 at 12.08.59 PM.png

                        F Offline
                        F Offline
                        Fanan
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @mikereadington
                        Thanks!

                        Now it's working!! 😊👌

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • MikeReadingtonM MikeReadington

                          I don't want to give you bad info, but I believe when you edit a container in Portainer, it actually deletes and publishes the edited one in place.

                          Check here.

                          Edit or duplicate a container | Portainer Documentation

                          Edit or duplicate a container | Portainer Documentation

                          Here are some screen shot from Portainer on my Synology. These are the locations you need to edit for port and TZ.

                          Screen Shot 2021-08-13 at 12.08.51 PM.png Screen Shot 2021-08-13 at 12.08.59 PM.png

                          F Offline
                          F Offline
                          Fanan
                          wrote on last edited by Fanan
                          #12

                          @mikereadington

                          • SOLVED*
                            Solved by using Watchtower. Followed this guide:
                            How to Update Docker Containers using Watchtower with Portainer

                          *OLD POST:
                          I've been able to update/pull the latest release of MSR a few times within Portainer (running in HA on a HA blue - odroid), but that's not possible anymore.
                          I only get this message:
                          b80f0d7c-b831-4680-af7b-ed72b213ce01-image.png I have stopped the MSR as I did before, but nothing seems to help anymore. I have reactor version 21228-05d7497 running, and can't upgrade.
                          My Portainer version is 2.6.2. Home Assistant is 2021.8.8.
                          Anyone else having this problem or knows why I can't pull and deploy the latest release?
                          /Fanan

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbits
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Your initial problem may have been due to a build error on my part; the build was redone during the course of yesterday and repushed, so that may have had more to do with your success than using WatchTower. You might want to try it the "old" way and see what happens.

                            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • V Offline
                              V Offline
                              vezinpi
                              wrote on last edited by vezinpi
                              #14

                              @Fanan If you are using the HASS.OS then this is a portainer issue in HAAS. See the following link:

                              Aug 23, 2021

                              Portainer v2.6.2 - unable to start containers

                              Portainer v2.6.2 - unable to start containers

                              Not sure what the problem could be, but even since the portainer update to v2.6.2 ( integration v2.0.0 ) I’m unable to (re)start any of my previous working containers… The failure I get is : Starting container with non-empty request body was deprecated since API v1.22 and removed in v1.24 Anyone...

                              Until the problem is resolved in HAAS you will have to install the previous version of the Add-on.

                              Using MSR 25139 on Docker, on a Raspberry Pi with Bookworm. Home Assistant 2025.07, Z-Wave JS-UI 10.6.1

                              F 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • V vezinpi

                                @Fanan If you are using the HASS.OS then this is a portainer issue in HAAS. See the following link:

                                Aug 23, 2021

                                Portainer v2.6.2 - unable to start containers

                                Portainer v2.6.2 - unable to start containers

                                Not sure what the problem could be, but even since the portainer update to v2.6.2 ( integration v2.0.0 ) I’m unable to (re)start any of my previous working containers… The failure I get is : Starting container with non-empty request body was deprecated since API v1.22 and removed in v1.24 Anyone...

                                Until the problem is resolved in HAAS you will have to install the previous version of the Add-on.

                                F Offline
                                F Offline
                                Fanan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                @vezinpi Thanks!
                                I installed alexbelgium repository and his version of Portainer. It was able to update MSR to the latest version (it took a few times with error messages, but then it worked). His version is also 2.6.3. - not 2.6.2. which is the latest available regarding the Portainer add-on i HA.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • V Offline
                                  V Offline
                                  vezinpi
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Thanks. I will keep that up my sleeve in case HASS fail to address the issue in a timely manner. But for now, the Portainer plugin version 1.5.2 is doing the trick.

                                  Using MSR 25139 on Docker, on a Raspberry Pi with Bookworm. Home Assistant 2025.07, Z-Wave JS-UI 10.6.1

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  Recent Topics

                                  • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                    toggledbitsT
                                    toggledbits
                                    0
                                    2
                                    53

                                  • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                    S
                                    SweetGenius
                                    1
                                    1
                                    45

                                  • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                    toggledbitsT
                                    toggledbits
                                    2
                                    1
                                    35

                                  • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                    G
                                    gwp1
                                    0
                                    1
                                    67

                                  • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                    CrilleC
                                    Crille
                                    0
                                    4
                                    102

                                  • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                    therealdbT
                                    therealdb
                                    0
                                    3
                                    117

                                  • Possible feature request 2?
                                    CatmanV2C
                                    CatmanV2
                                    0
                                    3
                                    87

                                  • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                    toggledbitsT
                                    toggledbits
                                    5
                                    133
                                    80.2k

                                  • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                    CatmanV2C
                                    CatmanV2
                                    1
                                    9
                                    396

                                  • Copying a global reaction
                                    toggledbitsT
                                    toggledbits
                                    0
                                    3
                                    121

                                  • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                                    CatmanV2C
                                    CatmanV2
                                    0
                                    9
                                    457

                                  • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                                    toggledbitsT
                                    toggledbits
                                    0
                                    4
                                    180
                                  Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                  Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Unsolved