-
Hey Patrick, had to switch over my HA VM from VirtualBox to VMware since VirtualBox stopped playing well. Anyways I updated the IP address to the new VM IP and deleted the Long Lived Access Token and created a new one just in case (copy pasted the new token into the config file). Tried rebooting both the HA machine and the MSR one too and MSR is still not connecting. The only thing I have not tried yet is creating another controller entry, but I am worried it may create all new entities for everything forcing me to redo all my logic. Here are some logs:
[latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:09.753Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:01.083Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:14.780Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:24.791Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.813Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.820Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.820Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out -
Deleted some entities from HA and added some new ones but MSR is still showing the old ones and not all of the new ones. I restarted MSR and it hasn't changed, is there anyway to manually discover new entities and delete the old ones? Most of the new entities have shown up but a few haven't, however none of the deleted entities were removed from MSR.
I checked the core.entity_registry in HA and none of the entities that are shown in MSR are there.
Edit: I see the delete option under the entities tab in MSR, is that the only way to delete them?
-
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed. -
Patrick,
I've just imported a large set of rules from Vera, and I had already played with creating rules in MSR that are mixed throughout the existing Vera rules. Is there any sort of way to "find/replace" in MSR, so I can find all matches to the old rules and replace them with the new ones? -
Patrick,
Yesterday I migrated a large luup Reactor group over from Vera to MSR, following the directions to importing it from Vera in the documentation. One of the odd things in the migration was the conditional rules for House Modes. Many of my rules had conditions such as "House Mode is any of Home, Night, or changes to Away.The way the import did it was changes from 1,3 to null. This importation did not seem to trigger rules correctly.
I was able to fix all the instances by creating multiple triggers in a group:
Entity Attribute: House Mode (vera>housemode) x_vera_housemode.mode contains home
OR Entity Attribute: House Mode (vera>housemode) x_vera_housemode.mode contains nightIs this what you are expecting in importation?
-
Good morning all,
This weekend I've been playing around with Home Assistant as a replacement (long term) for my aging Vera platform. I'm pretty amazed how much more capability it has. On the other hand, the sheer amount of variables it pulls in from devices is massive.In any case, I have added Google Calendar into Home Assistant for things like Federal Holidays and my daughter's school calendar. It connected to them without issue, which I had been having problems with in Vera an GCal3.
I connected MSR to Home Assistant, so I can start using some of the systems I've integrated into Home Assistant in MSR, and continue migrating my luup Reactor rules over to MSR. Now I'm trying to create a rule based on if today is a Federal Holiday or not. Reactor sees the calendar just fine, however, for whatever reason, it's not pulling data for today, but the next event, which in this case is Columbus day, three weeks away. The attribute that is pulling this is x_haas_attr.message.
I tested with my daughter's school calendar, and it did have an entry for today, and none of the other values seemed to be different, such as a "true" or something to tell me there is an entry.
a8478a6e-d8eb-4572-ac84-c94ff012a1ec-image.png
60632486-e80b-4f0f-aed9-dc67113689a4-image.png
ab04cd0f-f849-4e14-be7d-f4c00735da77-image.png
The only thing I've been able to come up with, is there is a start_time attribute, which shows the date as 2022-10-10 00:00:00
1cbe4526-7f63-4329-a088-b331f1d03376-image.png
The only thing I can think of is there might be a way to compare the current system date to that date, but I can't seem to figure that out in MSR.
Has anybody done this? Any suggestions?
-
I started kicking around the VEC last evening, was cut short, and dug in a bit more this morning.
My reactor.yaml:
d3df4d99-aa7f-4b8b-8fb9-5a6c615daad9-image.png
I verified the yaml is good at https://yamlchecker.com/
What I'm seeing in MSR:
0f89ce8e-7abe-4779-baca-43123e030cf4-image.png
87560ded-7dfa-4340-8585-8be58ff22852-image.png
I believe I have followed all steps (standard disclaimers apply).
Anyone else started to tinker with this newness and, if so, what were your results?
-
Having just embarrassed myself to @toggledbits by asserting that the latest release somehow had a bug when in reality it was surfacing underlying issues with my approach to building out my rulesets and automations I wanted to ask the collective for their feedback on how they've designed their rulesets.
For me, I built out a list of Global Reactions that I commonly use. For instance, for mode changes I typically change the mode entity and write that mode to a variable for some future use. When building out a ruleset I just pull in that Global Reaction vs manually recreating the entity list as my ruleset Reaction. Example, for lighting:
270bbe18-9680-491d-81d4-20308a9fe63c-image.png
Each of these contains the appropriate group of lights to turn on/off, etc.
I also have what I've dubbed my "Armed for..." rulesets. These are rulesets that can be referenced as true or false in other rulesets. Example, for my various lighting configurations in and out of the house I have these:
0d9f55d4-5d5d-42e2-a83c-8afa95df08fb-image.png
I think this is resulting in reactions stomping on other reactions creating race conditions that result in things looking like they're working when, in reality, they're one restart away from disaster.
So how are you all designing your superstructure, if you will, at a high level?
-
Maybe more of a cosmetic issue, but certain entities could be hidden from entity actions as you cannot set any meaningful action? See Vera as an example:
Screenshot 2022-09-16 at 15.11.29.png
vera>system is then obviously a different story and should be there
-
Hi @toggledbits,
I have a bridge consuming Vera's variable using the MQTTController in MSR, and I've noticed that after I've updated to the latest version (22257), some variables are not echoed. I've already tried to reboot MSR, with no luck.
These variables are under urn:smarthome-community:serverId:Vacuum
0fe837ed-3a29-4d5d-a06c-445981d44e13-image.png
A trace via MQTT explorer:
cf919028-4f7b-4761-b99a-c3943945704a-image.pngMy config has just exclude_capabilities: [] and it was working OK before the latest build. Even /query command doesn't seem to retrieve all the attributes. The values are retrieved correctly from the Vera controller, and I could use them in MSR, they're just not echoed to the bridge. Thanks!
-
Good morning all,
I"m working on converting my luup Reactor scenes over to MSR, so I can eventually introduce an Ezlo plus into the mix and not loose all the work I've done with Reactor. If nothing else, this should free up some resources on my aging Vera Plus, and maybe speed up some functions. Maybe that's just wishful thinking.In any case, I'm moving move my first Reactor set, which is a set of rules to control the blilnds/window coverings in my home. I have two types of blinds:
iBlinds retrofit motors (IB2.1-ZWx) version from late 2019.
Bali roman shades with factory installed Somfy CSZ1 Z-wave motors.I'm setting up reactions for both types of window coverings. One of the problems I always had in Vera was with iBlinds, I had to do it by luup commands:
luup.call_action("urn:upnp-org:serviceId:Dimming1","SetLoadLevelTarget",{ newLoadlevelTarget="50" },316)The reason for this, is that the open position was 100%, and the close position was 0%. In other words, the blinds were closed one way 100% an closed 100% the other way. I've been informed by iBlinds support that even in Ezlo, they still do it this way, which is different than most other Z-wave controller manufacturers. I'm not sure how the others do it, but some how "open" is right in the middle (50%).
So, in MSR, i can still set the Dimming1.SetLoadLevelTarget to 50, but I also noticed some other commands I haven't seen before in Reactor
3cdeeb89-5986-45bc-8a3b-79067050a22c-image.png
Is there some way in MSR to set that middle value to 50% so I can use cover.open? The command cover.close works as expected, so I'm wondering how I might use that cover.set.
Thanks for any advise.
-
I configured OWM Weather on MSR (latest-22257-dd9b9271), created an account with OWM, generated an API key, put the key in the yaml file, and I’ve waited over a day now. OWM Weather shows as up on the the Controller Status widget.
I’ve tried to create a trigger or constraint to use the data, and nothing is really showing up.
5B8611C1-33D0-4D3C-B507-7383CB81E25A.jpeg
I only have a free subscription with OWM, but I was expecting some data.
Is this expected behavior (i.e., still in development), or do I do more configuration other than the .yaml file?’
I still am able to pull Weather data through Dark Sky in my Vera plus controller, however, I know that will no longer work at some point.
-
Was just looking at the new metadata stuff in Entities for a lamp. I was on the dimming.level attritube and I then changed the dim level of the lamp several times and some how I got all these windows.
I then selected a different attribute color_temperature.value and that window was then shown over the top of all the others.
267e6d0d-7245-4816-ac93-ac83cfda509e-image.png
I don't know how to close these windows down ?
b09fd5f1-fffe-40c2-8ba6-8cffacd1e28b-image.png
Thanks
-
Hey Patrick, similar to R4V it would be nice if we could set the max amount of time a condition pulses. Currently in MSR you can only set it to pulse once or repeat continually until the condition goes false.
I currently have a rule that pings dead devices and occasionally the dead device needs a few pings for it to come back alive but I don't want it to keep pinging forever if the device is actually not functioning.
-
Hi
Anyone else been having issues with the MSR web UI not connecting after a period of time? Or is it just me?
If I reboot the Linux Debian box then MSR starts working again and I can open the web UI and it says connected.
However after sometime I then cannot later connect to the web GUI. It just says connecting all the time.
I also have Node-Red and HA Bridge running on the same box and I can connect to those two fine still.
Thanks
-
Is is possible for MSR to show newly detected ZwaveJS devices in the current alerts windows like Hubitat and HA? New devices show in the Entities but there is not an alert.
-
Hi Patrick,
For as long as I can remember, I have red x's instead of icons in MSR.05f25684-b338-4f69-8d0a-8a482a9fe1a2-image.png
I am running MSR in Docker and am on version 22252. If hosted in the cloud, they could be getting blocked by pihole.
Thanks,
Roger -
TLDR: I'm getting an alert saying I have to edit and re-save a rule containing a HTTP POST request in order to update it, but following the instructions in the alert doesn't seem to fix the issue.
I am receiving this message in the Current Alerts when sending a HTTP POST request.
The action at step 1 of "Send Notification Reaction" (re-I7yq7e15) needs to be edited to update it to the latest stored form. The action will continue, but should be updated as soon as possible, before this form is deprecated and no longer functions. Just make a trivial edit to the "headers" argument and then save the reaction to update it.
Details:
I am using a self-hosted notification system - Gotify. Many of my rules use a HTTP POST action to send a notification through this system. The message contains a JSON body with the title, body, and message priority. It is posted to a URL on my LAN where the Gotify server resides.
When I updated to latest-22252-65e94b36 I started to receive the above error. Since I had the http request in many rules I took the opportunity to simplify things by moving the http request to a Reaction in the Reactions section of MSR. I created two variables to pass the notification content to the Reaction and now send all notifications via the one Reaction. Each rule that needs to send a reaction sets the variable values and then runs the Reaction.
For example, this rule runs if the Kitchen Main leak sensor detects a leak. It sets the variable "g_gotify_token" to a value (this is used as part of the URL when making the HTTP request) and sets "g_gotify"body" to a JSON formatted string. In this case that string is
{ "title":"Water Alert", "message": "Kitchen Main Leak Sensor Tripped", "priority": 8 }Finally, the rule runs the Reaction "Send Notification Reaction"
79fd4034-c611-4173-b4e4-18cf5091b453-image.png
That reaction contains the http request. It uses the variables in the URL and request body fields. The request headers field is static and is set to "Content-Type: application/json"
d75d9305-a5ab-4401-9b75-ea72d08787fa-image.png
I get the same error when I directly call the HTTP request from a rule without using any variables. Either way, the notification goes through successfully. The only issue is the alert being raised in MSR.
I tried editing and re-saving the Reaction, and also tried creating an entirely new reaction. I get the same warning message either way.
footnote: Because I use the same process to send a notification whenever there is an alert raised in MSR, this also created a loop (that thankfully got throttled pretty quickly) where the system was making the http request to send a notification that this alert had been raised, and the action of sending that notification raised the alert again... etc...
Is this just a bug? Am I missing something about the request format that needs to be updated? I checked the manual and this forum for answers, but didn't find anything that looked relevant.
-
I use a number of multistring devices in my vera plus. My 'original' multistring devices work in Reactor i.e.:
9c5203dd-1993-4b5b-aeee-44377c1ee1c5-image.png
42b97524-9428-4222-a3fb-ce4e0009c00b-image.png
However, the new ones I have added do not show the device data sets / parameters (not sure what the correct term is?):
a54ddf29-ea32-47c9-906e-260a25dcb482-image.png
3efa1d0a-5466-4220-93d3-0a67da42a5d0-image.png
Is there something that I am doing wrong?
-
Hi
Is it possible to access the information that the MSR has about the last date and time that a device suffered a change? The information that appears in the Entities area?
dfd353df-15f9-44ef-bda3-8351363ea486-image.png
Use Case: I want to monitor all devices, and those that are not communicating/acting for more than 48 hours, take notice and action
Of course there are some that will not communicate by their nature, such as a water valve, so a list of exceptions would be created.
The principle is almost the same as Hubitat's WatchDog APP, but I want to have my own, and not be dependent on Hubitat's communication or action.
Thanks.
Added IP camera to Ezlo, what is causing this
-
@toggledbits I added an IP camera to my Ezlo for testing and my global variable for Ezlo devices that are not responding randomly do a quick toggle from empty to "IP camera" then back to empty.
Is it the controller interface not supporting IP cameras or something else causing this?
@2021-10-19T23:24:07.826Z[latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.043Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction Schema - Dräneringspump<SET> (rule-ktd8obiy:S) from step 2 [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.043Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1504> Engine#1 reaction rule-ktd8obiy:S step 2 perform { "entity": "vera>device_53", "action": "power_switch.off" } [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.043Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1407> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status 3; task 29 [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.044Z <VeraController:null> VeraController#vera enqueue task for Entity#vera>device_53 action power_switch.off: task { "newTargetValue": "0", "DeviceNum": 53, "id": "action", "serviceId": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:SwitchPower1", "action": "SetTarget" } [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.044Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1442> _process_reaction_queue ending with 1 in queue; none delayed/ready; waiting [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.048Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1442> _process_reaction_queue() wake-up! [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.049Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1403> _process_reaction_queue() running task 29 { "tid": 29, "id": "rule-ktd8obiy:S", "rule": "rule-ktd8obiy", "__reaction": [RuleReaction#rule-ktd8obiy:S], "next_step": 3, "status": 1, "ts": 1634684400015, "parent": --null--, "__resolve": --function--, "__reject": --function--, "__promise": [object Promise], "attempts": 3 } [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.049Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction Schema - Dräneringspump<SET> (rule-ktd8obiy:S) from step 3 [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.049Z <Engine:INFO> Schema - Dräneringspump<SET> all actions completed. [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.049Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1407> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status -1; task 29 [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:10:00.050Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1442> _process_reaction_queue ending with 0 in queue; none delayed/ready; waiting [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:17:00.724Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: network timeout at: http://127.0.0.1:3480/data_request?id=status&DataVersion=574966431&Timeout=15&MinimumDelay=100&output_format=json&_r=1634685402721 [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:07.826Z <EzloController:WARN> EzloController#ezlo warning: update parameter serviceNotification for Entity#ezlo>device_615e11a7129e071220cb5f8d not previously defined! (value now (boolean)false) [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:07.826Z <EzloController:WARN> EzloController#ezlo warning: update parameter syncNotification for Entity#ezlo>device_615e11a7129e071220cb5f8d not previously defined! (value now (boolean)false) [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:07.828Z <Rule:INFO> Rule#rule-ku32xyj5 evaluation in progress; waiting for completion [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:07.828Z <Rule:INFO> Rule#rule-kue8adhf evaluation in progress; waiting for completion [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:07.828Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:981> Engine#1 set global EzloDevicesNotResponding; value=(string)IP Camera [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:12.474Z <Rule:INFO> Rule#rule-ku32xyj5 evaluation in progress; waiting for completion [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:12.475Z <Rule:INFO> Rule#rule-kue8adhf evaluation in progress; waiting for completion [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:12.476Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:981> Engine#1 set global EzloDevicesNotResponding; value=(string) [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:12.482Z <Rule:INFO> Notifiering - Ezlo devices OK (Rule#rule-kue8adhf) SET! [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:12.483Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1442> _process_reaction_queue() wake-up! [latest-21292]2021-10-19T23:24:12.487Z <Rule:INFO> Notifiering - Ezlo devices OK (Rule#rule-kue8adhf) RESET! -
I need a more complete picture than this. Show the rule(s) involved and the global variables, please. There is a rule toggling at the end of the log snippet, but since you haven't really given me any context to know what is what, what it's doing or not doing, and why, I have no context for what I'm looking at.
And actually, now that I look at it, am I even looking at the rules, or are you just asking about the two log entries at the timestamp you gave? Not clear what your question/problem is....?
Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.
-
@toggledbits Sorry for not giving the whole picture. My question is if you know why "IP Camera" is added and removed from the variable within seconds.
Looking at it further myself though it seems like the Ezlo actually is reporting this device as "not reachable" for a few seconds, I misread the log and thought it was within ms and the WARN of "not previously defined" made me curious.The rule is just sending me a notification and triggers if the variable changes from anything to anything AND variable == string"", Pulse for 1 second.
The global expression is
Sorry to bother unnecessary
I guess I'll just remove the camera or filter it out in the expression as it's sending me notifications that all devices are responding again when my other rule that notifies me of devices not responding haven't had the chance to pick up the quick toggle. -
The logs are showing that the eZLO is sending updates, and apparently that value changed state twice in about 5 seconds: you can see at 24:07 where the global variable changes, so it has gotten one update and handled it, and then at 24:12 it has gotten another and changed it back. It would be an eZLO-side mystery to unravel why it's sending not-reachable followed by reachable so quickly, maybe a bug in their firmware, maybe just the way it works. It seems possible, even likely, that during any restart of the hub, devices would be marked down until they are known up, and some will just be left in the last known state until a new state is established, and given that the Vera engineering team is still present for the eZLO firmware, I'm sure they are still up to their old tricks and there is some inconsistency in which is chosen for which device or device class/type. I would not be at all surprised if IP-driven devices (like cameras) are marked for failure immediately when any request to the device fails, even on the first try, so lapses in network/wifi or the camera itself may lead to spurious marking of the device as failed followed by a quick recovery. These are all very real risks of the problem being solved.
So, probably something to mention in the other thread on this general (device error) subject: you may need to add a "sustained for" to your rule to dampen response, to allow for such momentary lapses, which are probably more common than we've ever realized, but will be on full display now that people are implementing rules like this.
The logged warnings... since eZLO is such a great unfinished unknown, and there are many inconsistencies and undocumented behaviors of their system and API, when an update for a device from the API arrives with a value that was not in the first device inventory, the warning is issued. Reactor then just adds the value to the device and carries on as if it was always there. So that's largely debug/notice of a surprise, but nothing harmful. And I'm not sure the values involved are even documented; I'll have to look (
serviceNotificationis known according to the API docs, and seems to be an internal value;syncNotificationis undocumented). But in any case, the warnings are advisory only and harmless and irrelevant to behavior here.Thanks for posting the screen shots in English!
Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.
-
@toggledbits Sustained for is the way to go here, thank you for your advice.
I can say that for Zigbee devices their firmware is a mess, a reboot of the controller marks all devices unreachable until they are physically toggled or reporting new sensor values, so rebooting means going around the house like a fool toggling lights and blowing on temp/humidity sensors, and if you don't do it fast enough you have to reboot again to give the devices a new chance to phone home in time.
-
Locked by toggledbits
