Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] Logic review: Arm for xmas season lighting
Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
T
Good day all, I'm in the process of trying to shut down my 10 year old Linux home server that served many purposes, but primarily it's what I used for my NAS/Plex Media server. I migrated the NAS aspect of the server in November of last year to a true NAS solution (Ubiquti UNAS Pro), which is rack mount and much more efficient than my old tower, which it's only side benefit was heating my home office during the winter. Unfortunately it also means heating my home office during the summer, which were about to be in full swing. I have two things running on this 10 year old server at this point. MSR and pi-hole. I'm running Plex Media Server on Fedora Workstation in Podman on mini PC, which is much more energy efficient than my old tower. My next step is to migrate MSR. I know there are images of MSR out there, and creating it is well documented. I'm going to be using Podman instead of Docker for various reasons, but they work very similar. What I don't know, is what I need to do to migrate my existing Bare Metal installation over to a container. Has anyone done this? Any advice?
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Organizing/ structuring rule sets and rules
R
Hi guys, Just wondering how you guys organize your rule sets and rules. I wish I had an extra layer to have some more granularity, but my feature request was not popular. Maybe there are better ways to organize my rule sets. I use the rule sets now primarily for rooms. So a rule set per room. But maybe grouping by functionality works better. Any examples/ suggestions would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Moving MSR from a QNAP container to RP 5 - some issues
Tom_DT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Widget deletion does not work and landing page (status) is empy
M
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Need help reducing false positive notifications
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deleting widgets
tunnusT
Hopefully a trivial question, but how do you delete widgets in a status page? Using build 22266
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT configuration question
tunnusT
I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file x_mqtt_device: set_speed: arguments: speed: type: str topic: "command/%friendly_name%" payload: type: json expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }' While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?
Multi-System Reactor
System Configuration Check - time is offset
F
Hi! I get this message when I'm on the status tab: System Configuration Check The time on this system and on the Reactor host are significantly different. This may be due to incorrect system configuration on either or both. Please check the configuration of both systems. The host reports 2025-04-01T15:29:29.252Z; browser reports 2025-04-01T15:29:40.528Z; difference 11.276 seconds. I have MSR installed as a docker on my Home Assistant Blue / Hardkernel ODROID-N2/N2+. MSR version is latest-25082-3c348de6. HA versions are: Core 2025.3.4 Supervisor 2025.03.4 Operating System 15.1 I have restarted HA as well as MSR multiple times. This message didn´t show two weeks ago. Don´t know if it have anything to do with the latest MSR version. Do anyone know what I can try? Thanks in advance! Let's Be Careful Out There (Hill Street reference...) /Fanan
Multi-System Reactor
Programmatically capture HTTP Request action status code or error
therealdbT
I have a very strange situation, where if InfluxDB restarts, other containers may fail when restarting at the same time (under not easy to understand circumstances), and InfluxDB remains unreachable (and these containers crashes). I need to reboot these containers in an exact order, after rebooting InfluxDB. While I understand what's going on, I need a way to reliable determine that InfluxDB is not reachable and these containers are not reachable, in order to identify this situation and manually check what's going on - and, maybe, in the future, automatically restart them if needed. So, I was looking at HTTP Request action, but I need to capture the HTTP response code, instead of the response (becase if ping is OK, InfluxDB will reply with a 204), and, potentially, a way to programmatically detect that it's failing to get the response. While I could write a custom HTTP controller for this or a custom HTTP virtual device, I was wondering if this is somewhat on you roadmap @toggledbits Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
ZwaveJSUI - RGBWW BULB - Warm/Cold White interfered with RGB settings - Bulb doesn't change color if in WarmWhite state.
N
Hi , I'm on -Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25067-62e21a2d -Docker on Synology NAS -ZWaveJSUI 9.31.0.6c80945 Problem with ZwaveJSUI: When I try to change color to a bulb RGBWW, it doesn't change to the RGB color and the bulb remains warm or cold white. I tryed with Zipato RGBW Bulb V2 RGBWE2, Hank Bulb HKZW-RGB01, Aentec 6 A-ZWA002, so seems that it happens with all RGBWW bulb with reactor/zwavejsui. I'm using from reator the entity action: "rgb_color.set" and "rgb_color.set_rgb". After I send the reactor command, It changes in zwavejsui the rgb settings but doesn't put the white channel to "0", so the prevalent channel remains warm/cold White and the bulb doesn't change into the rgb color. This is the status of the bulb in zwavejsui after "rgb_color.set" (235,33,33,) and the bulb is still warmWhite. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor={"warmWhite":204,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} The "cold white" and "warm white" settings interfer with the rgb color settings. Reactor can change bulb colors with rgb_color set — (value, ui8, 0x000000 to 0xffffff) or rgb_color set_rgb — (red, green, blue, all ui1, 0 to 255) but if warm or cold white are not to "0", zwavejsui doesn't change them and I can't find a way to change into rgb or from rgb back to warm white. So if I use from reactor: rgb_color set_rgb — (235,33,33) in zwavejsui I have x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: targetColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: targetColor 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: currentColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: currentColor In zwavejsui, the bulb changes rgb set but warm White remains to "204" and the bulb remais on warm White channel bacause is prevalent on rgb set. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_0=204 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_1=0 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_2=235 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_3=33 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_4=33 Is it possible to targetColor also for "warmWhite" and "coldWhite" and have something similar to this? x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"warmWhite":0,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} Thanks in advance.
Multi-System Reactor
Problem with simultaneous notifications.
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Problem after upgrading to 25067
R
MSR had been running fine, but I decided to follow the message to upgrade to 25067. Since the upgrade, I have received the message "Controller "<name>" (HubitatController hubitat2) could not be loaded at startup. Its ID is not unique." MSR throws the message on every restart. Has anyone else encountered this problem? I am running MSR on a Raspberry Pi4 connecting to two Hubitat units over an OpenVPN tunnel. One C8 and a C8 Pro. Both are up-to-date. It appears that despite the error message that MSR may be operating properly.
Multi-System Reactor
Global expressions not always evaluated
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression evaluation
V
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Runtime error when exiting global reaction that contains a group
S
I am getting a Runtime error on different browsers when I click exit when editing an existing or creating a new global reaction containing a group. If the global reaction does not have a group I don't get an error. I see a similar post on the forum about a Runtime Error when creating reactions but started a new thread as that appears to be solved. The Runtime Error is different in the two browsers Safari v18.3 @http://192.168.10.21:8111/reactor/en-US/lib/js/reaction-list.js:171:44 You may report this error, but do not screen shot it. Copy-paste the complete text. Remember to include a description of the operation you were performing in as much detail as possible. Report using the Reactor Bug Tracker (in your left navigation) or at the SmartHome Community. Google Chrome 133.0.6943.142 TypeError: self.editor.isModified is not a function at HTMLButtonElement.<anonymous> (http://192.168.10.21:8111/reactor/en-US/lib/js/reaction-list.js:171:34) You may report this error, but do not screen shot it. Copy-paste the complete text. Remember to include a description of the operation you were performing in as much detail as possible. Report using the Reactor Bug Tracker (in your left navigation) or at the SmartHome Community. Steps to reproduce: Click the pencil to edit a global reaction with a group. Click the Exit button. Runtime error appears. or Click Create Reaction Click Add Action Select Group Add Condition such as Entity Attribute. Add an Action. Click Save Click Exit Runtime error appears. I don’t know how long the error has been there as I haven’t edited the global reaction in a long time. Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25060-f32eaa46 Docker Mac OS: 15.3.1 Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Cannot delete Global Expressions
SnowmanS
I am trying to delete a global expression (gLightDelay) but for some strange reason, it comes back despite clicking the Delete this expression and Save Changes buttons. I have not created a global expression for some times and just noticed this while doing some clean-up. I have upgraded Reactor to 25067 from 25060 and the behaviour is still there. I have restarted Reactor (as well as restarting its container) and cleared the browser's cache several times without success. Here's what the log shows. [latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:22.690Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" } [latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:26.254Z <GlobalExpression:NOTICE> Deleting global expression gLightDelay [latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:27.887Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" } Reactor latest-25067-62e21a2d Docker on Synology NAS
Multi-System Reactor
Local notification methods?
CatmanV2C
Morning, experts. Hard on learning about the internet check script in MSR tools, I was wondering what suggestions anyone has about a local (i.e. non-internet dependent) notification method. This was prompted by yesterday's fun and games with my ISP. I've got the script Cronned and working properly but short of flashing a light on and off, I'm struggling to think of a way of alerting me (ideally to my phone) I guess I could set up a Discord server at home, but that feels like overkill for a rare occasion. Any other suggestions? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] Logic review: Arm for xmas season lighting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
10 Posts 3 Posters 438 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1

    I brought this over from Reactor for Vera back in the day. It's worked flawlessly, arming the lights for the xmas season which the various lighting rulesets point to. First night is the Friday after Thanksgiving and the last night is 01/07 as it covers the Russian Orthodox holiday.

    This year, it stopped running at exactly midnight on 01/01.

    ed10a6bd-2904-496d-91d2-19684f353ccd-image.png

    Anything stand out in my logic that I've missed?

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HASS 2025.3.4
    w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
    MQTTController: 24257
    ZWave Controller: 25082

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G gwp1

      I brought this over from Reactor for Vera back in the day. It's worked flawlessly, arming the lights for the xmas season which the various lighting rulesets point to. First night is the Friday after Thanksgiving and the last night is 01/07 as it covers the Russian Orthodox holiday.

      This year, it stopped running at exactly midnight on 01/01.

      ed10a6bd-2904-496d-91d2-19684f353ccd-image.png

      Anything stand out in my logic that I've missed?

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Alan_F
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @gwp1

      I played around with the from/to specific dates and it looks like you have two choices...

      Option 1: break it into two rules connected with an OR... rule 1: "After Nov 1st any year" and rule 2: "before Jan 7th any year". Or

      Option 2: add specific years... "From Nov 1st 2021 to January 7th 2022" works as you want it to.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Given the fact that it stopped running at exactly 01/01 midnight makes me wonder if there's a difference between MSR and RFV that isn't handling the crossover between years. Random guess - as I noted, this worked flawlessly (mostly because @toggledbits helped me thru the logic in RFV as I was very new to it) and was simply imported into MSR from Vera.

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HASS 2025.3.4
        w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
        MQTTController: 24257
        ZWave Controller: 25082

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          It's a bug in MSR. One extra check missing from the implementation on MSR. MSR and RFV necessarily implement the date comparisons very differently (although the valid expectation is that there should be no difference in the result). I thought I had all the edges tested, but I guess I missed a case. I opened PR 0000287 for it. I'll have it fixed later today. Still working on a requested item that I want to get out as well.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          G 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            It's a bug in MSR. One extra check missing from the implementation on MSR. MSR and RFV necessarily implement the date comparisons very differently (although the valid expectation is that there should be no difference in the result). I thought I had all the edges tested, but I guess I missed a case. I opened PR 0000287 for it. I'll have it fixed later today. Still working on a requested item that I want to get out as well.

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits Thank you for leaving my sanity intact on this first day of the shiny new year lol

            You also forced a test of the "Arm For" logic for non-holiday lighting as there'd been no non-holiday window of time since I'd corrected/updated it. So... #win?

            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HASS 2025.3.4
            w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
            MQTTController: 24257
            ZWave Controller: 25082

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              It's a bug in MSR. One extra check missing from the implementation on MSR. MSR and RFV necessarily implement the date comparisons very differently (although the valid expectation is that there should be no difference in the result). I thought I had all the edges tested, but I guess I missed a case. I opened PR 0000287 for it. I'll have it fixed later today. Still working on a requested item that I want to get out as well.

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @toggledbits Loaded up - see what happens tonight!

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HASS 2025.3.4
              w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
              MQTTController: 24257
              ZWave Controller: 25082

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                #7

                Nothing will change at the rule level, because you have a latched condition that is no longer latched driving an AND group all the way to the top.

                The only way to change it would be to set the "test time" back to the fourth Thursday in November 2021 to get the latched condition latched again, and then remove the test time to resume normal operation. If you want to try that, here's how, but before you do, understand that I don't know what other automations you have and how they are set up, and what effect the test time may have on those other automations. Again, it's home automation, not nuclear launch codes, so I suspect the worst will be some lights coming on when you don't expect, etc.

                1. Find the engine section of your Reactor.yaml file. If you don't have one, add it with the same indent level as baseurl as shown below:

                   baseurl: http://something:8111
                   engine:
                     enabled: true
                  
                2. Indented two spaces from the engine: line (i.e. the same as enabled), add a line test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm" and where I have put +hhmm put your current timezone offset from GMT. Note also that I've shown 08:00:00 for the time, but you can use any time of day that you think will have the least side-effects with other rules.

                   engine:
                     enabled: true
                     test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm"
                  
                3. Restart Reactor. The latched condition should go true and the rule should SET. You've basically time-warped the system backwards.

                4. After that's done, remove or comment out (with a '#') the test_time line, and restart Reactor again.

                5. Observe that the rule refreshes and should remain SET, with the latched group true and that last date/time condition (11/1 to 1/7) also still true (green).

                Also remember that I don't know what other rules that you have that may depend on this rule, so if there are date/time or sunrise/sunset rules that work in concert with this rule, they may not trigger unless the test time happens to also meet those rules. Just focus your attention on this one rule.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  Nothing will change at the rule level, because you have a latched condition that is no longer latched driving an AND group all the way to the top.

                  The only way to change it would be to set the "test time" back to the fourth Thursday in November 2021 to get the latched condition latched again, and then remove the test time to resume normal operation. If you want to try that, here's how, but before you do, understand that I don't know what other automations you have and how they are set up, and what effect the test time may have on those other automations. Again, it's home automation, not nuclear launch codes, so I suspect the worst will be some lights coming on when you don't expect, etc.

                  1. Find the engine section of your Reactor.yaml file. If you don't have one, add it with the same indent level as baseurl as shown below:

                     baseurl: http://something:8111
                     engine:
                       enabled: true
                    
                  2. Indented two spaces from the engine: line (i.e. the same as enabled), add a line test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm" and where I have put +hhmm put your current timezone offset from GMT. Note also that I've shown 08:00:00 for the time, but you can use any time of day that you think will have the least side-effects with other rules.

                     engine:
                       enabled: true
                       test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm"
                    
                  3. Restart Reactor. The latched condition should go true and the rule should SET. You've basically time-warped the system backwards.

                  4. After that's done, remove or comment out (with a '#') the test_time line, and restart Reactor again.

                  5. Observe that the rule refreshes and should remain SET, with the latched group true and that last date/time condition (11/1 to 1/7) also still true (green).

                  Also remember that I don't know what other rules that you have that may depend on this rule, so if there are date/time or sunrise/sunset rules that work in concert with this rule, they may not trigger unless the test time happens to also meet those rules. Just focus your attention on this one rule.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @toggledbits Seems like it has worked...

                  770af663-e77d-467e-bd38-cc511041d779-image.png

                  I also had a yellow warning about the system being in "test_time, not reality". But the true test came when I commented out the test_time line in reactor.yaml and restarted MSR and all the holiday lights came on.

                  The Russian Orthodox will have their Christmas lol

                  Thanks very much for this tool/tip - definitely will keep this around. And thank you for the really prompt fix on the bug, sir. I joke about the lights but it really wouldn't have ended the world if my lights were done for the season.

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HASS 2025.3.4
                  w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
                  MQTTController: 24257
                  ZWave Controller: 25082

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Apologies for interfering with tradition and observance! 🙂 I'm glad the test trick worked out, and indeed, it can be very handy. I'll make a note to add that to the Troubleshooting section of the docs as well.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      Apologies for interfering with tradition and observance! 🙂 I'm glad the test trick worked out, and indeed, it can be very handy. I'll make a note to add that to the Troubleshooting section of the docs as well.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @toggledbits Just confirmation that this all did do what it was to do: I was still in my office and watched the xmas lights do their thing!

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.151
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HASS 2025.3.4
                      w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-25082-3c348de6
                      MQTTController: 24257
                      ZWave Controller: 25082

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Recent Topics

                      • Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
                        T
                        tamorgen
                        0
                        5
                        43

                      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        5
                        122
                        35.4k

                      • Z-Wave Future....
                        CatmanV2C
                        CatmanV2
                        0
                        5
                        131

                      • Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        4
                        86

                      • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
                        wmarcolinW
                        wmarcolin
                        0
                        7
                        191

                      • Disaster recovery and virtualisation
                        CatmanV2C
                        CatmanV2
                        0
                        5
                        662

                      • Remote access of Zwave stick from Z-wave server
                        CatmanV2C
                        CatmanV2
                        0
                        3
                        384

                      • Organizing/ structuring rule sets and rules
                        G
                        gwp1
                        0
                        5
                        374

                      • Moving MSR from a QNAP container to RP 5 - some issues
                        G
                        gwp1
                        0
                        5
                        346

                      • Widget deletion does not work and landing page (status) is empy
                        G
                        gwp1
                        0
                        4
                        338

                      • Need help reducing false positive notifications
                        T
                        tamorgen
                        0
                        7
                        520
                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Unsolved