Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] Reactor 22067 + Hubitat / InfluxDB feed storing wrong value then stopping on specific attributes
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] Reactor 22067 + Hubitat / InfluxDB feed storing wrong value then stopping on specific attributes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
6 Posts 2 Posters 692 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alan_F
    wrote on last edited by Alan_F
    #1

    Reactor latest-22067 on Raspberry Pi, Influx DB 1.8, both in Docker. Controlling two separate Hubitat C7s.

    I am storing data for CPU load and free memory from the Hub Information device on the Hubitat Hub in the Influx database so that I can graph them.

    I noticed that for the last two days I was not getting the free memory on my graph. (I don't currently graph the CPU data.) When I restarted Reactor I got two data points and then nothing for a while.

    I looked at the Hubitat Hub Information device and could see the numbers changing there. I also watched the entities screen in Reactor and could see it flash green when it updated. Both the Hubitat device and the Reactor entities matched and were updating.

    However the Influx database stopped getting new data. What I see in Grafana matches what I see when I directly query the database in a terminal window, so it is not an issue with Grafana.

    The Hub Temperature data is updating in the database every time it changes. It is not one of the extra attributes that I added. It is logged as a regular temperature_sensor.

    This is the relevant portion of reactor.yaml:

          select_capabilities:   
            light_sensor: true   
            x_hubitat_Thermostat:
              attributes:
                - coolingSetpoint
                - heatingSetpoint
                - thermostatFanMode
                - thermostatMode
                - thermostatOperatingState
                - thermostatSetpoint
                - temperature
            x_hubitat_extra_attributes:
              attributes:
                - cpu5Min
                - cpuPct
                - freeMemory
            wx:
              attributes:
                - temperature
                - humidity
                - cloud_cover
    

    This chart from Grafana illustrates what is happening. The data points circled in red are the pairs of points from two restarts of Reactor. The yellow line and green line represent the two separate Hubitat hubs that I'm connected to. The blue line is the CPU temperature from one of the hubs.

    ac19c0aa-d9f5-4b82-9f8d-05d6ea2acc9e-image.png

    Here is the same graph from a little later to show the CPU temp is continuing to update, but the free memory is not:

    4014600c-8501-4e58-b13c-987b5a6e9502-image.png

    Again, the free memory is changing in the entities screen every time it changes in the hub, but the data isn't being saved to InfluxDB after the first two data points.

    Looking at the most recent documentation, I saw the format for the attributes was different, using a trailing ":true" intead of a leading "-", so I tried switching my reactor.yaml to match. The section now reads:

        x_hubitat_extra_attributes:
          attributes:
            cpu5Min: true
            cpuPct: true
            freeMemory: true
    

    I restarted Reactor and got the same result.

    Final observation... the second data point in each pair is incorrect...

    After the last restart I pulled the data from the database.

    time                controller    cpu5Min cpuPct entity            freeMemory name
    ----                ----------    ------- ------ ------            ---------- ----
    1646918194198000000 hubitat_11705 0.07    1.75   hubitat_11705>130 526192     Hub information
    1646918045910000000 hubitat       0.23    5.75   hubitat>483       324088     Hub information
    1646918032985000000 hubitat_11705 0.07    1.75   hubitat_11705>130 526192     Hub information
    

    The first and third lines are relevant here. They are both for the 'hubitat_11705' hub. They show the free memory as 526192 on both lines.

    But when the second data point was saved to the database the reactor entity showed:

    x_hubitat_extra_attributes.freeMemory="525728"
    

    and the Hubitat device shows:

    60812ba1-6200-4e3e-8ee5-2ebb0346d487-image.png

    So the second data point should have been saved in the database as '525728' but instead it saved the previous value of 526192.

    Looking back at the annotated Grafana graph I can see the same thing happened with the earlier pairs of points... the second point was the same value as the first, and then there was no more data logged until the next Reactor restart.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Checking the logs would be useful here (again: not seeing what you expect? Look at the logs.). Also you haven't shown your queries in Grafana. If you've got mean() or other aggregates in the query, or anything in group by, the presentation is not a representation of the raw feed. Remove all aggregates and groups to make sure you are looking at the raw data. Can be very confusing otherwise. On the road, won't be much responding to this more until I return around 3/20.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        Checking the logs would be useful here (again: not seeing what you expect? Look at the logs.). Also you haven't shown your queries in Grafana. If you've got mean() or other aggregates in the query, or anything in group by, the presentation is not a representation of the raw feed. Remove all aggregates and groups to make sure you are looking at the raw data. Can be very confusing otherwise. On the road, won't be much responding to this more until I return around 3/20.

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Alan_F
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits I wasn't expecting a reply until you got back from vacation and handled other higher priority things, but I'll try to add the additional information now:

        What I'm expecting is that each time the data on the Hubitat Hub Information device changes, that the values for that I added in my reactor.yaml file (cpu5Min, cpuPct, freeMemory) will be written to the influx database. This is what it was doing up until two days ago, and I think the change in behavior matches up to when I upgraded to 22067.

        The Grafana queries are not using aggregates, nor was the direct query I ran from Influx via the command line, but I should have posted the query I used to pull the data. Here is data I just pulled directly from Influx using a command prompt, filtering on only one hub to make it simpler:

        > select * from x_hubitat_extra_attributes where entity = 'hubitat>483' order by time desc limit 6
        name: x_hubitat_extra_attributes
        time                controller cpu5Min cpuPct entity      freeMemory name
        ----                ---------- ------- ------ ------      ---------- ----
        1646918045910000000 hubitat    0.23    5.75   hubitat>483 324088     Hub information
        1646918032714000000 hubitat    0.23    5.75   hubitat>483 324088     Hub information
        1646916245576000000 hubitat            3      hubitat>483 325848     Hub information
        1646916119494000000 hubitat            3      hubitat>483 325848     Hub information
        1646914445106000000 hubitat    0.11    2.75   hubitat>483 325904     Hub information
        1646914238104000000 hubitat    0.11    2.75   hubitat>483 325904     Hub information
        

        Starting from the bottom of the list with the oldest two records, they are about 4 minutes apart but show the exact same numbers.

        The next two records again are about 4 minutes apart and show the same numbers.

        The top two records are about 1 minute apart and show the same numbers.

        Between each pair of logged values I restarted Reactor. On the last set - the top two in this list - I was watching the Reactor Entities screen and saw that the Hub Information entity updated at the time the last data point was stored, but the values were NOT 0.23, 5.75, and 324088.

        I can upload logs when you get back. I looked at the times in the log when this data was stored and I don't see anything related to Influx. I do see the updates coming from the Hub Information device.

        I was able to find the logs corresponding to the two records in the middle (showing 325848 as the freeMemory)

        The timestamp on the older one converts to: Thursday, March 10, 2022 12:41:59.494 PM

        In the logs I find the value for the freeMemory a few minutes earlier at 12:39:05Z. I think the time discrepancy is because I restarted Reactor between when the value was logged and when it got written to the database. When Reactor started up, it wrote the most recent value to Influx.

        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:39:05.568Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:641> HubitatController#hubitat received DEVICE event [Object]{ "source": "DEVICE", "name": "freeMemory", "displayName": "Hub information", "value": "325848", "type": "null", "unit": "KB", "deviceId": 483, "hubId": 0, "installedAppId": 0, "descriptionText": "null" }
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:39:05.569Z <HubitatController#hubitat:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat fast update Entity#hubitat>483 event freeMemory="325848"
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:39:05.569Z <HubitatController#hubitat:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat fast update Entity#hubitat>483 event freeMemory="325848"
        
        
        

        The next record from the database with the same values has a timestamp that converts to Thursday, March 10, 2022 12:44:05.576 PM

        That matches up in the logs with this:

        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:44:05.632Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:641> HubitatController#hubitat received DEVICE event [Object]{ "source": "DEVICE", "name": "freeMemory", "displayName": "Hub information", "value": "325884", "type": "null", "unit": "KB", "deviceId": 483, "hubId": 0, "installedAppId": 0, "descriptionText": "null" }
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:44:05.633Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:643> HubitatController#hubitat ws DEVICE event device 483 freeMemory="325884"
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:44:05.633Z <HubitatController#hubitat:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat fast update Entity#hubitat>483 event freeMemory="325884"
        

        So at 12:44:05 I'm expecting the freeMemory written to the database to be 325884, but the database query returned 325848, the previous value from a few minutes earlier in the logs.

        The next instance of the hub freeMemory in the logs is at 12:49:05Z

        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:49:05.763Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:641> HubitatController#hubitat received DEVICE event [Object]{ "source": "DEVICE", "name": "freeMemory", "displayName": "Hub information", "value": "325664", "type": "null", "unit": "KB", "deviceId": 483, "hubId": 0, "installedAppId": 0, "descriptionText": "null" }
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:49:05.764Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:643> HubitatController#hubitat ws DEVICE event device 483 freeMemory="325664"
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T12:49:05.765Z <HubitatController#hubitat:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat fast update Entity#hubitat>483 event freeMemory="325664"
        

        There is no corresponding record in the Influx database. I would expect an entry with freeMemory of 325664.

        There are additional logs showing the Hubitat Hub Information device updating values every few minutes, but nothing was added to the database until after 1:13:52Z when I restarted Reactor. Then I got the two entries showing a freeMemory of 324088, but as with the middle two record in the query results, the second one of the pair is wrong. The last (top of the list) data in the database shows freeMemory of 324088 and its timestamp converts to Thursday, March 10, 2022 1:14:05.910 PM

        The log shows:

        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T13:14:05.943Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:641> HubitatController#hubitat received DEVICE event [Object]{ "source": "DEVICE", "name": "freeMemory", "displayName": "Hub information", "value": "323712", "type": "null", "unit": "KB", "deviceId": 483, "hubId": 0, "installedAppId": 0, "descriptionText": "null" }
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T13:14:05.945Z <HubitatController#hubitat:5:HubitatController.js:643> HubitatController#hubitat ws DEVICE event device 483 freeMemory="323712"
        [latest-22067]2022-03-10T13:14:05.945Z <HubitatController#hubitat:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat fast update Entity#hubitat>483 event freeMemory="323712"
        

        I would have expected the database entry at 13:14:05Z to show 323712 as the freeMemory value.

        I haven't restarted Reactor since then, and as I type this several hours later, no new data for these attributes has made it into the database.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          I'm not quite out the door yet; I was just leaving ample room for packing, and whatever support my older son needed for a final exam he was taking today.

          So I see two things contributing here:

          1. There is an opportunity for a value change that occurs during a loss of connection to the hub and a reconnect to be missed; that is, if Reactor stays running, but the hub is rebooted, Reactor may miss a value that changes (and free memory would almost certainly change there). This would be due to the new fast update behavior, so a new issue. That will take a code fix, which I can safely and quickly make in the next hour or so.

          2. The event websocket is sending all values for updated (Hubitat) attributes as strings. That's disappointing. That will make InfluxDB choke, because the values given by Maker API, which are the first values inserted into the database, will be numbers, thereby cementing the type for that field in InfluxDB. Thereafter, the attempt to insert a string will fail because the data types don't match. This is a chronic InfluxDB problem, and I actually made some code changes to the integration about a month ago to help get around that problem when it comes up. So, you will need to modify your InfluxDB plugin config to look more like this:

                  x_hubitat_extra_attributes:
                    attributes:
                      cpu5Min:
                        type: number
                      cpuPct:
                        type: number
                      freeMemory:
                        type: number
                      uptime:
                        type: number
          

          This will make the plugin coerce (if it can) each value to its "proper" type before handing it off to InfluxDB. You can do this now, and it should have an immediate effect on your updates. The code change mentioned above (item 1) handles a rarer circumstance that you could also see, but is probably not the major contributor to what is going on for you today. Try this change out, and see if it helps. I expect it will. If so, you may want to consider adding this to other attributes being exported to InfluxDB.

          I can do more in HubitatController to make sure the types are properly converted when they come in from the event websocket, but that's a bigger change that I'm reticent to make right now. The code change to fix the restart update is small, so I'm more confident in making that change today, but I'll leave the rest for later. The type configuration should work around that issue pretty effectively until I get back.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Alan_F
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Just realized I was only looking in the Hubitat.log file, which we turned on while trying to troubleshoot something else, and not in the reactor.log file... Ugh... need more coffee before trying to troubleshoot. Apologies for making this more difficult by missing that. In the reactor.log files I found the Influx errors saying that the database field was type 'float' and the data from the hub was 'string'. If I had posted that at the top of this thread, it would be a much shorter read.

            After changing the attributes as you showed above I'm now getting correct data into the database and I'm not seeing errors in reactor.log.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              What you posted was great, and I was able to see the string data in the events, so clue attained, and that's a win. We'll fix it right when I get back.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              Recent Topics

              • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                CrilleC
                Crille
                0
                5
                70

              • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                toggledbitsT
                toggledbits
                5
                130
                73.8k

              • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                G
                gwp1
                0
                6
                92

              • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                toggledbitsT
                toggledbits
                1
                1
                52

              • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                M
                mgvra
                1
                3
                134

              • Script action and custom timers
                toggledbitsT
                toggledbits
                0
                4
                149

              • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                CatmanV2C
                CatmanV2
                0
                12
                410

              • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                akbooerA
                akbooer
                1
                2
                120

              • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                CrilleC
                Crille
                0
                6
                171

              • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                toggledbitsT
                toggledbits
                0
                17
                488

              • Shelly Wall Display XL
                akbooerA
                akbooer
                2
                9
                811

              • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                toggledbitsT
                toggledbits
                0
                26
                905
              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
              Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Unsolved