@CatmanV2 what device (hub) fo you use to connect your z-wave devices? I'm using my old vera but at some point I need to decide what to replace it with. I agree with your comment about the strengths of HA and MSR.
T
Talisker
@Talisker
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC.
Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc.
Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box?
Thanks.
The last of four boards I'm trying in this batch is the Orange Pi 4 LTS. I purchased a 3GB RAM + 16GB eMMC model from Amazon for $83, making it the most costly of the four boards tried, but still well under my US$100 limit.
This board is powered by a Rockchip RK3399-T processor, ARM-compatible with dual Cortex-A72 cores and quad Cortex-A53 cores at 1.6Ghz (1.8Ghz for the 4GB model); compare this to the RPi 3B+ with four Cortex-A53 and the RPi 4B with four Cortex-A72, this board is a hybrid that I would expect to stand in the performance middle between the two RPi models. It's available in 3GB and 4GB DDR4 RAM configurations, with and without 16GB eMMC storage. It has a MicroSDHC slot, gigabit Ethernet, WiFi and BT, two USB 2.0 type A ports, one USB 3.0 type C port, a mini PCIe ribbon-cable connector (requires add-on board for standard connector), two each RPi-compatible camera and LCD ports, HDMI type A, and can be powered (5VDC/3A) via USB-C or DC type C (3.8mm OD/1.1mm ID) jack (center-positive), an odd and perhaps unwelcome departure from the more common type A (5.5mm/2.1mm). A serial port for console/debug can be connected by using a (not included) USB-TTL adapter (3.3V) via pin headers like the Orange Pi Zero 2. The included dual-band antenna connects via U.FL connector to the board, so it's easy substituting for another if you prefer. The manufacturer recommends use of a heat sink (which was included in the box). A metal cooling case is also offered by the manufacturer (a bundle with the metal case and a power supply is sold on Amazon for $90 as of this writing).
The Orange Pi 4 LTS is somewhat longer than the RPi 4B, and although the boards are the same width, the mounting hole placement is different both in length and (oddly) width. Between this and the differences in connector locations, neither board is a drop-in replacecment for the other and their respective cases are not interchangeable. The 26-pin header is a subset of the RPi 4B's 40-pin header, so some HATs for the RPi may work (although the mounting hole differences will make securing them "interesting"), and some HATs will surely not.
Models with eMMC storage have an OS installed and boot immediately with SSH daemon running and ready for login. Mine was running Debian Bullseye, which would probably be fine for most users. It had clearly been on there a while, because it needed a lot of updates, but it's a current distro, so you're running out of the box with something that will last.
A different OS can be installed by downloading an image (once again I chose Ubuntu Jammy) and writing it to a MicroSD card, then booting the system from the SD card. You can either leave the system in that state (running the OS from the SD card), or copy the OS from the SD card to the eMMC. The latter is done by a script; documentation for the process is best described in the downloadable PDF User Manual. This took about 10 minutes and went smoothly, and I was able to boot the system without the SD card after the process completed.
I have lingering questions around the value of the eMMC storage. It's definitely faster than using MicroSD or USB-based storage (I got 311MB/s average on a 4GB write, compared to MicroSD performance around 15MB/s), but it would take a long-term test of this product to determine if the on-board eMMC option has the stamina to take the write counts typical of Linux systems, and if its wear-leveling and error correction are sufficient to assure a long, error-free life. Given the high premium apparently being paid for including eMMC on the board, it should be fast and durable, but only time and experience (perhaps painful) would tell the latter. A careful configuration with other Flash-friendly filesystems could be used to reduce wear, but this is an advanced configuration/cookbook topic and beyond the scope of this writing. This question is also not unique to eMMC — MicroSD cards are also known to fail with high write cycles, so the use of a "high endurance" product is recommended for any and all systems using MicroSD as primary storage. The board has Mini PCIe capability, and that may be a storage alternative, but read on...
Also bear in mind that the eMMC storage is fixed-size forever; it cannot be expanded, and 16GB can run out pretty quickly these days. Users of MicroSD cards for primary storage can upgrade to bigger cards, but when users of eMMC primary storage outgrow it, the only choice is to add a MicroSD card or other "external" storage to the system, move part of the filesystem to it, and then manage both storage devices and deal with the limitations and risks of both.
As I mentioned with the Orange Pi Zero 2, if you are going to use this board as a home automation controller/gateway or similar role, it should (IMO) have a battery-backed real time clock (RTC), and Orange Pi offers an add-on module that connects directly to the 26-pin header on the board. An available expansion board provides a standard Mini PCIe interface and SIM card slot (hmm...), but it connects to the main board via a short ribbon cable, and its mounting holes have no complement on the main board, so it seems like it would be a fragile dangly thing that's a nuisance to deal with.
I want to like this board more, and it's very capable, but I'm concerned about value. The limited options for eMMC (16GB or none), the question mark of the eMMC's longevity vs cost, the strange DC power connector choice, the lack of 40-pin GPIO on a full-size (plus) board, the inconsistent hole placement, and the fragile Mini PCIe arrangement, are all "cons" that devalue this board in my view. The price point is clearly driven by the additional capabilities of the board (camera support, ports, six core CPU, extra RAM, on-board eMMC storage), but unfortunately, a great many of these features may not be useful for home automation, and therefore potentially a waste of money.
In terms of overall value, I still believe the Libre "Le Potato" seems a better choice to me, and the Orange Pi Zero 2 (very) a close second, but I'll admit I'm focused on a particular application and your needs may be better suited to what this board offers than mine.
Passmark Results:
OrangePi 4 LTS
Cortex-A72 (aarch64)
6 cores @ 1200 MHz | 2.9 GiB RAM
Number of Processes: 6 | Test Iterations: 1 | Test Duration: Medium
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Mark: 583
Integer Math 12037 Million Operations/s
Floating Point Math 2542 Million Operations/s
Prime Numbers 4.5 Million Primes/s
Sorting 3141 Thousand Strings/s
Encryption 153 MB/s
Compression 4049 KB/s
CPU Single Threaded 154 Million Operations/s
Physics 80.5 Frames/s
Extended Instructions (NEON) 244 Million Matrices/s
Memory Mark: 498
Database Operations 551 Thousand Operations/s
Memory Read Cached 2524 MB/s
Memory Read Uncached 2602 MB/s
Memory Write 3182 MB/s
Available RAM 1947 Megabytes
Memory Latency 119 Nanoseconds
Memory Threaded 6243 MB/s
---------------
eMMC storage write 311MB/s average for 4GB; MicroSD (Samsung 32GB class 10) storage write 15MB/s.
With Raspberry Pi boards continuing to be relatively scarce, I've been trying a few alternatives to see what may be usable and good. I had previously written about the Jetson Nano 2GB, which is great, but a little pricey, so I'm trying to find sub-US$100 boards that will run Reactor.
I've got four that I'm trying now, but one in particular goes right to work in the most predictable way and seems worth a mention immediately: the Libre Computer Board AML-S905X-CC 2GB (known as "Le Potato").
The form factor is very similar to that of the Raspberry Pi 3 B+, and has comparable CPU (ARM Cortex-A53, quad 64-bit cores at 1.5+GHz -- slightly higher clock speed). It's US$35 on Amazon and LoverPi in the (recommended) 2GB configuration, and easy to get.
Startup is like RPi: download one of the available OS images (Ubuntu, Raspbian, Debian, ARMbian, etc.) from their site and write the image to a MicroSD card, insert into slot, power up, and off you go. I tried the Ubuntu 22.04 image first and it comes right up. No problem getting nodejs 18.12.1 installed and running (with Reactor).
No WiFi on board, but I don't see that as a minus for use as a controller/hub (which should be hard-wired, IMO). The 40-pin GPIO connector is compatible with typical RPi HATs (PoE, breakouts, etc.).
There is an available eMMC (solid state storage) module to use instead of MicroSD, which I would recommend for long-term use. It runs US$25 for 32GB (64GB and 128GB available). The module is scarcely larger than the chip it carries, and has the smallest board-to-board connector I've ever seen.
Next up: ESPRESSObin 2GB (spoiler: it's... technical...)
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration
This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something?
Cheers
C
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration:
users:
# This section defines your valid users.
admin: *******
groups:
# This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application
# and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to
# more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here.
admin_group:
users:
- admin
applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications
guests:
users: "*"
applications:
- dashboard
api_acls:
# This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API
- url: "/api"
group: admin_group
allow: true
log: true
# This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint
- url: "/api/v1/alive"
allow: true
session:
timeout: 7200 # (seconds)
rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true
# If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged.
log_acls: true
# If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged.
debug_acls: true
My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules.
I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds).
Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off?
With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches.
Thanks
Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7
VirtualEntityController v25356
Synology Docker
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future.
In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level.
Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way.
I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption.
A few other things to know:
If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc.
Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy).
The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON.
You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach).
The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case.
This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change.
This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks.
Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option?
No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices
Cheers
C
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions;
Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating;
Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later;
Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase;
Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions;
Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases);
Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Posts
-
New HA instance -
Critical Disk Space WarningI updated to the latest version of Reactor this morning. I run reactor (successfully) on a Raspberry PI 4 4GB with SSD 64GB. I also run Home Assistant in Docker. After updating I noticed a disk space critical error warning!
I have tried purging the docker install (docker image prune -a)
I have rebooted the Raspberry PI also, and the error messages keep coming.
I have the following disk space:
How do I free up space?
Any help would be appreciated.
-
MSR setup for http request (today's date)No Reset Reaction or Local Expressions are set.
The request URL is:
https://api.octopus.energy/v1/products/SILVER-22-04-25/gas-tariffs/G-1R-SILVER-22-04-25-M/standard-unit-rates/?page_size=10&period_from=https://api.octohttps://api.octopus.energy/v1/products/SILVER-22-04-25/gas-tariffs/G-1R-SILVER-22-04-25-M/standard-unit-rates/?page_size=10&period_from=${{Tomorrow_Date}}&order_by=period -
MSR setup for http request (today's date)@toggledbits Thanks for your pointers. Partial success:
However, the expressions do not update! I use Tomorrow_Date in a Rule (HTTP Request):
Is there a way to force an update on selected expressions, say at a set time every day?
-
MSR setup for http request (today's date)@toggledbits Thanks for the prompts, following which I made some progress:
I have Test51 which contains tomorrow's date, but I am struggling to get the time in a sting representation. I am trying to represent the day in Test53 expression but I have a syntax error.
I would appreciate some more guidance.
-
MSR setup for http request (today's date)Background to the question
I've been experimenting a little and I need help. If I use the following expression:
I get the correct response (i.e. today's day number '16'th).
I can use this in a HTTP requst to download some tarrif information via an API from my energy supplier - i.e. today's gas unit rate tariff
What I'd like to do
I would like to download tomorrow's gas unit rate tariff. To do this I need to set up and expression with today's date + 1 day (in the case of my example expression above that would be '17' (today being the 16th).
Question: How do I take today's date and add 1 day - so that I can make the HTTP request for tomorrow's information?
Any guidance or suggestions would be appreciated.
-
Reactor not showing full vera device parametersSo, I have found my missing parameters! They appeared following a reactor update. Perhaps next time I add new vera devices, I should stop reactor and re-start it after I have added the new devices and things have settled down. Anyhow, thanks again for your assitance Patrick.
-
Reactor not showing full vera device parametersI have a number of rules which using entity actions I write values into multistring devices in my vera plus. Below is an example of how I do this in Reactor:
If I add a new multistring device in my vera plus I cannot set the device variables as I can with 'old' multistring devices. The below screen shot shows that the same drop down menu options in reactor for the new multistring device are not present as they are for the old device above:
If I look at the reactor entities for an old multistring entity (device #887) and a newly created multistring entity (device number '1056) I can spot a difference as per the screen shot below. I guess my question is 'why are the available actions not listed for new multistring devices (entities))?
-
Reactor not showing full vera device parameters@toggledbits it appears that I used the wrong terminology. I have looked at the two Reactor logs (vera-user_data-initial.json and vera-status-initial.json files) again, comparing the attributes for 1056 and 1057 against other devices, the respective attributes don't seem out of place. All attributes are listed for the two multistring devices (or should I say they appear to be listed). See below for device 1056. Does this confirm that the attributes for the two new entities (devices) are being read correctly by reactor?
vera-status-initial.json
{
"id": 1056,
"states": [
{
"id": 334,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName1",
"value": "Y'day Gas kWh"
},
{
"id": 335,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable1",
"value": "99"
},
{
"id": 336,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName2",
"value": "V2"
},
{
"id": 337,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable2",
"value": "0"
},
{
"id": 338,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName3",
"value": "V3"
},
{
"id": 339,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable3",
"value": "0"
},
{
"id": 340,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName4",
"value": "V4"
},
{
"id": 341,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable4",
"value": "0"
},
{
"id": 342,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName5",
"value": "V5"
},
{
"id": 343,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable5",
"value": "0"
},
{
"id": 344,
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Options",
"value": ""
},
{
"id": 345,
"service": "urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1",
"variable": "Configured",
"value": "0"
}vera-user_data-initial.json:
{
"id": 1056,
"device_type": "urn:schemas-upnp-org:device:VContainer:1",
"id_parent": 0,
"embedded": 0,
"disabled": 0,
"device_file": "D_MString.xml",
"manufacturer": "",
"model": "",
"altid": "",
"ip": "",
"mac": "",
"time_created": "1662320801",
"plugin": "8231",
"states": [
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName1",
"value": "Y'day Gas kWh",
"id": 0
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable1",
"value": "99",
"id": 1
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName2",
"value": "V2",
"id": 2
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable2",
"value": "0",
"id": 3
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName3",
"value": "V3",
"id": 4
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable3",
"value": "0",
"id": 5
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName4",
"value": "V4",
"id": 6
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable4",
"value": "0",
"id": 7
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "VariableName5",
"value": "V5",
"id": 8
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Variable5",
"value": "0",
"id": 9
},
{
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"variable": "Options",
"value": "",
"id": 10
}
],
"impl_file": "I_MString.xml",
"ControlURLs": {
"service_514": {
"service": "urn:upnp-org:serviceId:VContainer1",
"ControlURL": "/upnp/control/dev_514",
"EventURL": "/upnp/event/dev_514",
"serviceType": "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:VContainer:1"
}
},
"device_json": "D_MString.json",
"name": "Gas_Params",
"room": "11",
"local_udn": "uuid:4d494342-5342-5645-0420-000002fc93e7"
}, -
Reactor not showing full vera device parametersPlease find my responses below. I fear you may be frustraited by my lack of knowlege but I have done my best based on your guidance. I am not able to upload the logs. Do you need these?
Sorry about the thumbnail screen shots - I could not find a better way to capture them!
'I would look at the attributes listed for the entities in the Entities list.' So the unreadable thumbnail images showed that the expected entities for the two new vera multistring devices are not available in Reactor.
I have looked at the vera logs (http://192.168.XX.XXX/cgi-bin/cmh/log.sh?Device=LuaUPnP after a luup reload. If I search for the two new multistring devices (1056 & 1057) the entries looked quite normal compared to the log entries for similar devices. So I assume no vera error?
I have looked at the two Reactor logs (vera-user_data-initial.json and vera-status-initial.json files) again, comparing the entries for 1056 and 1057 against other devices, the respective lines don't seem out of place. All entities are listed for the two multistring devices.
-
Reactor not showing full vera device parametersYes Patrick. I also tried an alternative browser. Tried a hard re-boot also on my Pi4.
-
Reactor not showing full vera device parametersI use a number of multistring devices in my vera plus. My 'original' multistring devices work in Reactor i.e.:
However, the new ones I have added do not show the device data sets / parameters (not sure what the correct term is?):
Is there something that I am doing wrong?
-
MSR setup for http request (today's date)I have made an http request and get the following JSON response which I have stored in a global variable gas_consumption (like the example above). See below.
I have then tried to the following expression to extract the consumption value:
Clearly the returned data "results" is not published for today (strftime( "%F) i.e. 4/9/2022.
How do I extract the gas consumption for a particular date?
How do I extract yesterday's gas consumption (in the case of the response below 3/9/2022)?===group
{ "count": 482, "next": "https://api.octopus.energy/v1/gas-meter-points/xxxxxxxxxxx/meters/xxxxxxxxxxx/consumption/?format=json&group_by=day&page=2&page_size=10", "previous": null, "results": [{ "consumption": 0.0, "interval_start": "2022-09-03T00:00:00+01:00", "interval_end": "2022-09-03T01:00:00+01:00" }, { "consumption": 1.077, "interval_start": "2022-09-02T00:00:00+01:00", "interval_end": "2022-09-03T00:00:00+01:00" }, { "consumption": 0.669, "interval_start": "2022-09-01T00:00:00+01:00", "interval_end": "2022-09-02T00:00:00+01:00" }, { "consumption": 0.761, "interval_start": "2022-08-31T00:00:00+01:00", "interval_end": "2022-09-01T00:00:00+01:00" }, { "consumption": 0.614, "interval_start": "2022-08-30T01:00:00+01:00", "interval_end": "2022-08-31T00:00:00+01:00" }, { "consumption": 0.0, "interval_start": "2022-08-29T00:00:00+01:00", "interval_end": "2022-08-29T01:00:00+01:00" }, { "consumption": 0.569, "interval_start": "2022-08-28T00:00:00+01:00", "interval_end": "2022-08-29T00:00:00+01:00" }, { "consumption": 0.0, "interval_start": "2022-08-27T00:00:00+01:00", "interval_end": "2022-08-28T00:00:00+01:00" }, { "consumption": 0.455, "interval_start": "2022-08-26T00:00:00+01:00", "interval_end": "2022-08-27T00:00:00+01:00" }, { "consumption": 0.681, "interval_start": "2022-08-25T00:00:00+01:00", "interval_end": "2022-08-26T00:00:00+01:00" }] } === -
MSR setup for http request (today's date)@toggledbits thank you once again! Very clear instructions. I am now up an running and have opened up new opportunites to extend my automation.
-
MSR setup for http request (today's date)@toggledbits I am not sure if the returned result is JSON? I can obviously paste the response into a JSON formatter but I guess that is not the same thing? The result is unfortunately not just the 'latest' (today's rate), but a whole history of days which means I'd have to pick out the values under each day or today '2022-07-25'
https://octopus.energy/api/v1/tracker/G-1R-SILVER-2017-1-M/daily/past/90/1/?format=json
-
MSR setup for http request (today's date)I would like to extract the daily gas price from my fuel supplier's API. The http call is as follows: https://octopus.energy/api/v1/tracker/G-1R-SILVER-2017-1-M/daily/past/90/1/
I need to pick the current (i.e. today's) gas price. If I search through the text manually I can find today's data, in this case 2022-07-20.
Can I set MSR up to do a http request and then extract the "unit_rate" into a variable so that I can set another rule up to determine if it would be cheaper to heat my hot water using the immersion heater or gas (FYI my off peak electricity price is £0.075 per kwh). Any help or guidance as always is much appreciated.
I'm running MSR on raspberry PI 4 in docker version 22168
Thanks.
{ "date": "2022-07-20", "market_index": 62.8463, "cost": 15.094631164947945, "standing_charge": 15.0885, "unit_rate": 8.211, "usage": 0.0007467013698630137, "unit_charge": 0.0061311649479452055, "breakdown": { "unit_charge": { "Wholesale cost": 6.28463, "Environmental & social obligations": 0.0, "Delivery & networks": 0.9681, "100% green": 0.0, "Administration, financing & margin": 0.56727, "VAT": 0.391 },` -
Copying configuraiton and rules from QNAP install to Raspberry PI 4 installSorry @toggledbits . I tied it again after a good break and it appears to work fine. I honestly don't know what was going wrong but things seem to now be in order:
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ cd reactor
pi@raspberrypi:~/reactor $ ls
config docker-compose.yml logs storage
pi@raspberrypi:~/reactor $ docker-compose down
Stopping reactor ... done
Removing reactor ... done
Removing network reactor_default
pi@raspberrypi:~/reactor $ docker-compose pull
Pulling reactor ... done
pi@raspberrypi:~/reactor $ docker-compose up -d
Creating network "reactor_default" with the default driver
Creating reactor ... donedocker-compose.yml below FYI:
Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160)
Change the lines indicated by "DO"...
version: '3'
services:
reactor:
container_name: reactor
environment:
# DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone.
# See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones
TZ: GB
#
# DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below.
REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor# DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp -
Copying configuraiton and rules from QNAP install to Raspberry PI 4 install@toggledbits something is not working quite right with my docker install (docker-compose). Not sure where to start!
-
Copying configuraiton and rules from QNAP install to Raspberry PI 4 install@toggledbits thanks for the methodology. I manged to copy the files from a usb stick to the relevant folders using the sudo cp command. Feeling pretty pleased as I am now up an running on my raspberry pi.
-
Copying configuraiton and rules from QNAP install to Raspberry PI 4 install@catmanv2 I tried that thanks and it works:
sudo docker stop reactor #stops reactor
sudo service docker restart #starts reactorCheers!
