Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
T

tamorgen

@tamorgen
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
therealdbT
If you’re like me and still running HABridge to control your devices locally via Alexa, you might need to tweak your endpoints to call Reactor via HTTP. Here’s the best way to do it, IMO: Insert the Reactor Canonical ID (e.g., zwavejs>71-1) into the MapID field, but make sure it’s URL-encoded like this: zwavejs%3E71-1. Then, configure these endpoints as needed: On: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/power_switch.on Off: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/power_switch.off Dim: For lights: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/dimming.set?level=${intensity.decimal_percent} For roller shutters: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/position.set?value=${intensity.decimal_percent} Color: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/rgb_color.set_rgb?red=${color.r}&green=${color.g}&blue=${color.b} Just replace [ReactorIP] with your actual IP address. By using these placeholders, you can standardize your endpoints across all devices, making maintenance easier. This setup works with any device mapped under MSR, regardless of the controller (ZWaveJS, Vera, HASS, OpenSprinkler, virtual, MQTT, DynamicEntities, etc.). If you need different calls, just go to the entities, get the action and parameters, and adjust accordingly. Enjoy super fast access to your devices via Alexa! If you're migrating from Vera, the endpoints are (URL-encoded) in a file called device.db, in JSON format, under your config. You'd write a script to align the new endpoints to the new one, if you prefer to do it automatically. YMMV.
How-To
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
CatmanV2C
Just for the record, in case anyone is following, I'm really rather impressed. I have installed one of these: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0B6P22YJC?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title&th=1 That's connected (physically) to the VM running on my Synology, with a 2m USB extension. The same host also runs Openluup, Mosquito, HA Bridge. Yesterday I installed Zigbee2mqtt. That was a bit of a PITA but mostly because of ports and permissions. Once up and running, and the correct boxes ticked, immediately visible in Home Assistant via the MQTT integration, and thence into Reactor I've only got two devices. I bought the cheapest sensor I could find, which is a door sensor. Dead easy to add to ZIgbee2mqtt and again, immediately visible in HA. https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0FPQLWRW1?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title The dongle is on the top floor of the house, and I wanted the sensor on the back door (just about as far apart as it's possible to get short of going into the garage) When I moved the sensor downstairs it dropped out pretty instantly (which wasn't a huge surprise) so quick bit of research found out that smart plugs will act as routers so... https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0FDQDPGBB?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title Took me about 30 seconds to connect. Updated the name. Instantly visible in Reactor with the new name pushed over from Zigbee2mqtt. And lo, the door sensor now has a signal of 140 and works as far as I can tell perfectly and instantly (unlike my z-wave one). A few more of those will be purchased and used to replace the Tuya wifi cloud devices and the (continually failing) Z-wave plugs (yeah, they were TKB so....) Commended to the house. Thanks for everyone that got me on the right lines. C
Zigbee
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Zigbee2mqtt installed! sytemctl not happy :(
CatmanV2C
Hello oh great ones. After a couple of hours messing with ports and permissions I have Zigbee2mqtt installed and running on my virtual pi Can connect to the front end and everything Odd one though, simply cannot get systemctl to work and the error is, well, unhelpful. The service file is this: [Unit] Description=zigbee2mqtt After=network.target [Service] Environment=NODE_ENV=production Type=notify ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/node index.js WorkingDirectory=/opt/zigbee2mqtt StandardOutput=inherit # Or use StandardOutput=null if you don't want Zigbee2MQTT messages filling syslog, for more options see systemd.exec(5) StandardError=inherit WatchdogSec=10s Restart=always RestartSec=10s User=pi [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target Straight out of the docs with the change to point to my local node install (which we know works as it's the same as the very fine Reactor is using. Running manually pnpm start in /opt/zigbee2mqtt works fine However: catman@openluup:/etc/systemd/system$ sudo systemctl start zigbee2mqtt.service Job for zigbee2mqtt.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status zigbee2mqtt.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. Which I have catman@openluup:/etc/systemd/system$ sudo systemctl status zigbee2mqtt.service ● zigbee2mqtt.service - zigbee2mqtt Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/zigbee2mqtt.service; disabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: activating (auto-restart) (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2025-12-16 12:32:42 GMT; 4s ago Process: 3093 ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/node index.js (code=exited, status=217/USER) Main PID: 3093 (code=exited, status=217/USER) and -- A start job for unit zigbee2mqtt.service has begun execution. -- -- The job identifier is 17477. Dec 16 12:35:16 openluup systemd[3178]: zigbee2mqtt.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process Dec 16 12:35:16 openluup systemd[3178]: zigbee2mqtt.service: Failed at step USER spawning /usr/local/bin/node: No such process -- Subject: Process /usr/local/bin/node could not be executed -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support: https://www.debian.org/support -- -- The process /usr/local/bin/node could not be executed and failed. -- -- The error number returned by this process is ERRNO. Dec 16 12:35:16 openluup systemd[1]: zigbee2mqtt.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=217/USER -- Subject: Unit process exited -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support: https://www.debian.org/support -- -- An ExecStart= process belonging to unit zigbee2mqtt.service has exited. -- -- The process' exit code is 'exited' and its exit status is 217. Dec 16 12:35:16 openluup systemd[1]: zigbee2mqtt.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. -- Subject: Unit failed -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support: https://www.debian.org/support -- -- The unit zigbee2mqtt.service has entered the 'failed' state with result 'exit-code'. Dec 16 12:35:16 openluup systemd[1]: Failed to start zigbee2mqtt. -- Subject: A start job for unit zigbee2mqtt.service has failed -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support: https://www.debian.org/support -- -- A start job for unit zigbee2mqtt.service has finished with a failure. Which strikes me as very odd. Any blindingly obvious things I'm missing? TIA! C
Zigbee
Any thoughts on which is better
CatmanV2C
Obviously a quiet forum, but perhaps it's time I'm looking at rolling Zigbee into my system, in large part for the Aqara FP300 presence sensors which seem to finally provide a solution to if the wasp is actually in the box. My current set up is as follows: One Debian VM on Synology NAS running: Z-wave Server Open Luup Multi system reactor HA bridge Mosquito MQQT broker This machine has a UZB Z-wave stick connected via the USB port on the NAS Another HAOS VM on the same NAS running HAOS I've got some older Z-wave stuff that I keep around until it fails. I have some Tuya stuff integrated in HA My thought was to get either a SMLIGHT SLZB-06M or an Aqara Hub M2 Integrate them via Zigbee2MQQT (running on the Debian machine) and then expose them in HA so I can continue to automate in MSR. Thoughts on which of those devices wold be preferable long term. Both are POE capable which is good. It also appears I could add a USB dongle to the NAS and expose it to the HAOS machine. Any thoughts from the assembled experts here? TIA C
Zigbee
Single protocol?
CatmanV2C
Another question to the hive mind. Prompted by the fact that I lost yet another z-wave device over the weekend due to a power issue. It looks like z-way server is reporting another device failed (although it's working fine) and message queue is far too long IMHO. Also the failed device has been removed in the expert interface, but still there in the 'normal' one. Sigh. Currently I have z-wave, Tuya, thinking about Zigbee.... Does anyone use one single protocol for everything? Right now I'm feeling that as the z-wave stuff dies, I'm just gonna replace it with something else.... C
General Discussion
HDMI oddness
CatmanV2C
Not really Smart Home stuff, but going to ask as we have smart people... Bear with me on this one. Asking here because of the font of knowledge! For many eek years I have had a Virgin V6 box and a Raspberry Pi running Kodi connected to my TV through a cheap *** HDMI switch. It all worked beautifully but the absolutely critical thing was that the TV remote passed the signals back to the Pi to allow remote control of Kodi. Couple of changes of late: Installed a soundbar on the TV using the ARC (audio return channel). That then turns the soundbar on and off when the TV turns on and off and the TV volume control controls the soundbar volume direct. Everything continues to work Upgraded the software of the Tivo box to Virgin 360. This is literally software only. You get sent a snacky new Bluetooth remote hit 'upgrade' on the screen and off it goes. Now, things are not playing well. Typically when I turn on to watch Kodi the soundbar comes on (as it should) but the TV either puts out sound through its own speakers and the soundbar, or just the soundbar. It's not possible to control the volume of the soundbar through the TV. Also it's not longer possible to control Kodi using the TV remote. If I turn the TV360 box off, i.e. power it down, before turning on to watch Kodi, everything is fine. This makes little to no sense to me. My assumption is that the cheap *** HDMI switch is getting something from the TV360 connection that it didn't used to get when the software was Tivo and that's screwing up the HDMI communications. I'm upgrading the switch to something a little less chap, but wondered if anyone could validate my theory at all? TIA C
General Discussion
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Oh the joy of pairing
CatmanV2C
When I remember the old days Just added a new Tuya plug (OK so it's cloud) Start to finish, visible in HA and MSR < 30 seconds... C
Vera
Home Assistant Connect ZWA-2 & ZBT-2
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Hardware
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
About
Posts
202
Topics
41
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Need help with sequence
    T tamorgen

    Good evening all,
    For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time.

    Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed.

    Thanks.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
    T tamorgen

    @gwp1, stay at zwave-js-ui: 11.3.1, zwave-js: 15.14.0 (5.2.1) They broke iBlinds after that. It's' been reported and it's being worked, the last I saw. HAAS 2025.11.2 is working fine without upgrade ZwaveJs-UI.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
    T tamorgen

    I'm running into this as well. It appears that using haas>whatever-switch and power_switch.on or power_switch.off isn't working since the 25310 update and Haas 2025.11.0. I had a few stragglers in my rule sets that stopped working. I switched to using zwavejs>whatever-switch, and it works fine.

    I also tried from Entities --> whatever-switch --> Perform --> power_switch.on and there is no action performed

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Way to search for rules (rule state) in other rules
    T tamorgen

    That's fair. Thanks for answering with a workaround at least 🙂

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Way to search for rules (rule state) in other rules
    T tamorgen

    @toggledbits, not sure if this is a feature request or I'm using the search tool wrong. You have a "Search for rule" in the Rules Set tab in MSR. It works nicely to find a rule and bring up said rule, but can it/could it be used for as a "where used?" global search? For instance, I have a fairly large set of rules, divided up into 10 different rulesets. There's easily a hundred individual rules, and many of the rules have Rule State triggers, which of course refer to other rules. Amongst my troubleshooting today, I came across what may have been a duplicate or troubleshooting attempt, but I can't tell if it's actually used as a Rule State in another rule without opening each rule that I suspect it may be a part of.

    Thanks.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

    @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

    Essentially, don't try to do things with "one big beautiful ruleset"

    Seriously. It can't be done in one, but sometimes I swear I've paired it down into so many individual functions, I forget how it all works together. When I'm troubleshooting, I have to go back and look at the rules, and think "what was I trying to do here again?"

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

    Essentially, don't try to do things with "one big beautiful ruleset"

    Seriously. It can't be done, but sometimes I swear I've paired it down into so many individual functions, I forget how it all works together. When I'm troubleshooting, I have to go back and look at the rules, and think "what was I trying to do here again?"

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    @gwp1, no only away. The Home mode is only 15 seconds.

    287d259d-cdc8-40e8-a723-e754ebfcb5f4-image.png

    However, since the "Phones Home" rule is a geofence rule (based upon the HA companion app), it detects the phone being there before I'm actually in the house. The Home mode does not disarm the alarm system, that is still manually done at the keypad. The only delay would be lights automatically turning on, or blinds opening during the day.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    Test appears to be successful. I was able to use one of the guest users PINs for the alarm panel, and the system went into and stayed in Guest mode. Thanks to @gwp1 for reminding me to keep it simple and get rid of the reset.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    Okay, this actually seems to be working. I needed to disarm my home alarm first, then put it in Guest mode. It appears be holding now.

    Next test, is I need to disarm the system with one of the guest users to see if it stays disabled.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

    @tamorgen You're falling into the same pitfalls I did. Notice my Mode SETs don't have resets. No need. The next appropriate rule SETs so there's no reason to reset. Any resets (like from GUEST back to AWAY or VACA) are done via their own SET rulesets.

    Okay, I think I've made progress thanks to your suggestion.

    I took the thought of creating a new rule for "Go to Away Mode", and removed the reset from "Phones Home".

    In the new "Go to Away Mode" rule, I added a condition that the mode needs to "Phones Home" rule needs to be sustained for 60 seconds.
    688c0605-c4f5-4903-8b70-e1571c6f29f1-image.png This at least makes it specific, as to what my rules do.

    Next I tried to toggle the house mode in Home Assistant, and well, it immediately changed to "Home", which is different than what I expected.

    So now, the "Go To Home Mode" rule is being tripped. I added a very short 15 second "must be sustained" condition for the "Phones Home" rule state in that rule, and now it lets me change the drop down to Guest Mode. Unfortunately, 15 seconds later, i changes to Home mode, then it changes to Away mode. I feel like this is progress, but I need to figure out why it's not staying in Guest mode

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

    @gwp1 said in Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction:

    @toggledbits gave me very sound advise early on as I was prone to making my rulesets "do too much" in addition to waaaaaay overthinking/overcomplicating things.

    Instead of trying to make a ruleset that determines presence AND tries to set mode, just have it determine presence. Have one for your immediate family and one for your guests. Then use the TRUE FALSE state of them in your mode rules. (Saves you countless hours later, too, when you add/remove people from either presence ruleset.)

    That is essentially what I'm doing. The "Phones Home" doesn't set the mode, except to reset it. I suppose I could make the reset a separate rule, but I'm not sure how that would solve my problem.

    And it's 100% possible I'm overthinking this, or I'm in so deep, that I'm not seeing the obvious. Many of these rules were built on the original Reactor in Vera, before converting to MSR. I had to work with the limitations of Vera at the time, and of course the plug-ins that stopped working quite regularly.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    @gwp1 ,
    So, the conditions for Away, are essentially the reset of the "Phones Home" rule. If no phones are home, and the conditions for Guest haven't been set, then it's going the "Phones Home" rule becomes false and resets itself.

    The Guest mode is met (or supposed to be) when the user code from my home alarm is read for 2 specific user IDs, or I have manually set the mode to Guest from Home Assistant (it's a input select value, the last screen shot in my last post). Unfortunately, this only works properly if someone in the HA companion app users is home to put the mode into Guest.

    The Guest mode ends when a HA companion app user arrives back home.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    Sorry for the delay in responses. I've been traveling, and it's been difficult to do any of the troubleshooting on my iPad

    @toggledbits, it's quite the opposite of what you think. The Phones Home rule I mostly use as a rule state for another rule. That other rule is what put's my Home Assistant and Reactor into Home Mode.

    c4c9c626-c54f-44a5-9c70-36e7f82b2fd8-image.png

    When the "Phones Home" rule becomes true, the "GoTo Home Mode" changes settings in the home that puts for the all the other reactions that may or may not occur, depending on time of day, time of year, etc. When the any of the phones leave the geofenced area, and the "guest mode" isn't set (the last of the 6 triggers in the "Phones Home" rule, it reset's the rule state, which changes the House Mode to Away.

    Now, here is the real problem I'm having. As I mentioned in the initial post, I have a guest mode specifically for people that need to come in my home, that don't have the Home Assistant companion app, such as a neighbor that I might need to come over and check on our cats while we're gone, or our house cleaner that comes by once a month. They have a code to the alarm system, and I can tell by the user ID on the panel which user disarmed the system. From there, I want to put the system into Guest mode, so the Phone's Home mode won't reset, and the "Arm Away" rule set's the alarm system to Away, which in turn arms the interior motion sensors, and you can see where it would go badly from there.

    ef085637-2030-4ed4-91b5-06d68f1c0f23-image.png

    dd195622-1dcb-4afa-aca1-18cfedef2837-image.png

    So, what is happening, is when one of the guest's tries to disable the system, it rearms a minute or so later. The "GoTo Guest Mode" doesn't have a chance to put the "House Mode" into Guest.

    Guest Mode does work, if I'm able to have the "House Mode" set to Home first, then change it to Guest, but this unfortunately requires me to be at home to make this work.

    You can see below from Home Assistant, that when I'm away, and I try to manually put the House Mode into Guest, it immediately goes back into Away.

    2f08334f-32f2-4a53-b217-e9173aa08548-image.png

    In the Reator logs, you can see the immediate reset.

    root@hal:/home/tmorgenthaler/reactor/logs# cat reactor.log.1 | grep Phones
    [latest-25139]2025-06-16T13:31:47.275Z Rule:INFO Phones Home (rule-grp19i3lbdi in Phone presence) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET!
    [latest-25139]2025-06-16T13:31:47.307Z Rule:INFO Phones Home (rule-grp19i3lbdi in Phone presence) evaluated; rule state transition from SET to RESET!
    [latest-25139]2025-06-16T13:31:47.316Z Engine:INFO Enqueueing "Phones Home<RESET>" (rule-grp19i3lbdi:R)
    [latest-25139]2025-06-16T13:31:47.318Z Engine:NOTICE Starting reaction Phones Home<RESET> (rule-grp19i3lbdi:R)
    [latest-25139]2025-06-16T13:31:47.346Z Engine:INFO Resuming reaction Phones Home<RESET> (rule-grp19i3lbdi:R) from step 1
    [latest-25139]2025-06-16T13:31:47.346Z Engine:INFO Phones Home<RESET> all actions completed.

    The only thing I can think of is there needs to be some sort of delay for the reset in the "Phones Home" rule, but I'm not sure the best way to approach it.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    @gwp1, yeah, I collapsed them because of how I’m having to work on my iPad.

    Each of those collapsed rules, are rule states of other rules, which determine the actual presence of the individual users. They are all identical, except for which device they tracking.

    524e8079-d947-468c-8b75-bb088270a2c9-image.png

    0bf03e08-084f-4d2b-a9fe-dff9e236a01c-image.png

    These work nearly flawlessly individually. If a user has the companion app, no issue. It’s when I’m trying to “fool” the system for non users into arming into away mode, shutting everything down, and arming the home alarm system to away, that I’m having issues with, if you follow

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
    T tamorgen

    Good afternoon all,
    I believe I’m having an issue with my logic for setting my home modes in MSR, partially based upon Phone modes in Home Assistant. Users in my family have the Home Assistant companion app installed on their phone, and it geofences the users, so once they are within my home circle geographically, it sets a Boolean to home mode. If they are out it it’s away. I also have a couple of other modes, which I struggle to activate, and it causes issues when I have guests, or pet sitters that come over that do no have the companion app.

    I have a guest mode that has to be manually set in Home Assistant, that disables the Away mode automation (based on the companion app statuses), until either a user with the companion app arrives home, or a guest arms the alarm system (away arm).

    My issue is that I seem to unable to set the system into Guest mode from Home Assistant, because MSR keeps trying to arm the system. I think that I need to have some sort of a delay for the Reset reaction.

    In the rules below, each of the users has a separate reaction that evaluates the state of the iPhone. This rule is a giant OR rule that evaluates the state off all them to decide the mode of the house.

    d70a1267-6966-49fd-8ef9-b6ffa9ccb5c2-image.jpeg

    0104720d-e38f-44f8-8d72-df8b7c6d6ad7-image.png

    Appologizes for the formatting. I’m away from home and doing this on my iPad, so my screenshots can’t display the full rule.

    As you can see in the Rule history, it was rapidly resetting every time I tried to put the house into guest mode around 18:00 yesterday. I was on a plane and my mother-in-law arrived to take care of our pets, and I had to log in on my phone to my server and disable MSR to stop the automation in the house completely.

    767ae3d9-4b10-4763-bc3b-48ac666c0283-image.png

    Any suggestions on how I can handle this flapping?

    I have another set of rules for users that don’t have the companion app, but is rather based on the user ID for the alarm system and put the house into Guest mode, but I’ve never been able to get this to work completely. It exhibits the same behavior of trying to arm the system immediately.

    The only reliable way for me to set the house into Guest mode is to be in at home mode first, then switch to guest mode. I believe this is all linked to this rule in question.

    I appreciate the long read and any advice.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
    T tamorgen

    @toggledbits,
    Well, I took a first step. I tried using the docker-compose.yaml file with podman-compose, but it gave me some issues. I fell back on just using docker-compose, and it worked with only a minor hickup. It told me the version tag was depricated and to remove it to prevent problems in the future, so I did so, and it's running without issue. Rules and reactions are working as before, which is fantastic. Reactor on my old server is stopped/disabled, so one more item crossed off. I'm hoping to have the old server fully decommissioned this weekend.

    At some point, I'll go back and try and get it running with Podman, if it's possible. I can engage their community and see if they have any advice, but right now it's more important for me to turn off my office heater going into summer.

    The other major advantage is that in theory, I won't have to manually update nodejs each release, which has been kind of a pain lately.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
    T tamorgen

    @toggledbits, thanks for the very detailed reply. One of the things I was struggling with understanding was the reference to the user directory in the example docker compose file.

    In reality, docker and podman aren’t that different. Podman can use docker images without issue. I’m doing so currently with a Plex image. In fact, I didn’t even have to destroy and recreate the container. All I had to do was take the variables out of the docker container and put it into Podman. Podman will even often run with docker compose files.

    And you are right about user privileges. Podman doesn’t need to run things as root. They see it as an advantage.

    Another advantage is that you can run multiple containers in the same network space. For instance, I can run Pi-hole and Unbound in the same private IP space, so they can interact with each other, but nothing that I don’t want to.

    Back to the subject at hand, I need to copy my extras, config, and storage directories into my user directory, and they’ll stay safe, and I should be able to have my reactor service up and running on the new server, is what I’m hearing. I’ll let you know how it goes.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
    T tamorgen

    Good day all,
    I'm in the process of trying to shut down my 10 year old Linux home server that served many purposes, but primarily it's what I used for my NAS/Plex Media server. I migrated the NAS aspect of the server in November of last year to a true NAS solution (Ubiquti UNAS Pro), which is rack mount and much more efficient than my old tower, which it's only side benefit was heating my home office during the winter. Unfortunately it also means heating my home office during the summer, which were about to be in full swing.

    I have two things running on this 10 year old server at this point. MSR and pi-hole. I'm running Plex Media Server on Fedora Workstation in Podman on mini PC, which is much more energy efficient than my old tower. My next step is to migrate MSR. I know there are images of MSR out there, and creating it is well documented. I'm going to be using Podman instead of Docker for various reasons, but they work very similar. What I don't know, is what I need to do to migrate my existing Bare Metal installation over to a container.

    Has anyone done this? Any advice?

    Multi-System Reactor
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved